82 FR 21195 - Certain Activated Carbon From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 86 (May 5, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 86 (May 5, 2017)
| Page Range | 21195-21197 | |
| FR Document | 2017-09143 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 86 (Friday, May 5, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 21195-21197] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-09143] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-904] Certain Activated Carbon From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015- 2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to requests from interested parties, the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain activated carbon from the People's Republic of China (PRC) for the period of review (POR) April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. The Department selected two companies, Jacobi Carbons AB and Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., as mandatory respondents for individual examination. The Department preliminarily finds that subject merchandise has been sold in the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the POR. The Department invites interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective May 5, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Palmer or John Anwesen, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-9068, or (202) 482- 0131, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is certain activated carbon. The products are currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 3802.10.00.\1\ Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order remains dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Activated Carbon from the People's Republic of China; 2015-2016,'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum) from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, issued dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Based on an analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) information, and no shipment certifications submitted by Calgon Carbon (Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Shanxi Dapu International Trade Co., Ltd., and Sinoacarbon International Trading Co., Ltd., the Department preliminarily determines that these companies had no shipments during the POR. For additional information regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Consistent with our practice in non-market economy (NME) cases, the Department is not rescinding this review, in part, but intends to complete the review with respect to these companies, for which it has preliminarily found no shipments, and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). We calculated constructed export prices and export prices in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a NME within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, NV has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Verification As provided in sections 782(i)(3)(A)-(B) of the Act, we intend to verify the information upon which we will rely in determining our final results of review with respect to the two mandatory respondents, Jacobi Carbons AB and Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. Preliminary Results of the Review The Department preliminarily finds that 186 companies for which a review was requested did not establish eligibility for a separate rate because they either failed to provide a separate rate application or separate rate certification (SRC).\3\ As such, we preliminarily determine that these 186 companies are part of the PRC-wide entity.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ While Ningxia Guanghua Activated Carbon Co, Ltd. (Guanghua) submitted a timely SRC, it did not have any sales to the United States. Additionally, we note that Guanghua is part of a single entity with Ningxia Guanghua Cherishmet Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. See ``Separate Rates'' section of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum; see also, Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Attachment I for a complete list of the 186 companies which were not found eligible for a separate rate. \4\ Because no interested party requested a review of the PRC- wide entity and the Department no longer considers the PRC-wide entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews, we did not conduct a review of the PRC-wide entity. Thus, the rate for the PRC-wide entity is not subject to change as a result of this review. See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November 4, 2013). The PRC-wide entity rate of 2.42 U.S. dollars per kilogram was last reviewed in Certain Activated Carbon from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 70163 (November 25, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 21196]] For companies' subject to this review that have established their eligibility for a separate rate, the Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the POR from April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average dumping margin Exporter (U.S. dollars per kilogram) \5\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jacobi Carbons AB \6\................................ 1.02 Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd............. 0.62 Beijing Pacific Activated Carbon Products Co., Ltd... 0.82 Carbon Activated Tianjin Co., Ltd.................... 0.82 Datong Municipal Yunguang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd.. 0.82 Jilin Bright Future Chemicals Company, Ltd........... 0.82 Ningxia Guanghua Cherishmet Activated Carbon Co., Ltd 0.82 Ningxia Huahui Activated Carbon Co., Ltd............. 0.82 Ningxia Mineral and Chemical Limited................. 0.82 Shanxi Industry Technology Trading Co., Ltd.......... 0.82 Shanxi Sincere Industrial Co., Ltd................... 0.82 Shanxi Tianxi Purification Filter Co., Ltd........... 0.82 Tancarb Activated Carbon Co., Ltd.................... 0.82 Tianjin Channel Filters Co., Ltd..................... 0.82 Tianjin Maijin Industries Co., Ltd................... 0.82 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results to the parties no later than ten days after the date of the public announcement of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ In the second administrative review of the Order, the Department determined that it would calculate per-unit weighted- average dumping margins and assessment rates for all future reviews. See Certain Activated Carbon From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Second Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 70208, 70211 (November 17, 2010). See also Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Activated Carbon From the People's Republic of China, 72 FR 20988 (April 27, 2007) (``Order''). \6\ In the third administrative review of the Order, the Department found that Jacobi Carbons AB, Tianjin Jacobi International Trading Co. Ltd., and Jacobi Carbons Industry (Tianjin) are a single entity and, because there were no facts presented on the record of this review which would call into question our prior finding, we continue to treat these companies as part of a single entity for this administrative review, pursuant to sections 771(33)(E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.401(f). Certain Activated Carbon from the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Third Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 67142, 67145 n.25 (October 31, 2011). See also Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Because, as noted above, the Department intends to verify the information upon which we will rely in making our final determination, interested parties may submit written comments in the form of case briefs within one week after the issuance of the last verification repot and rebuttal comments in the form of rebuttal briefs within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\7\ Rebuttal briefs must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs.\8\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument: 1) A statement of the issue; 2) a brief summary of the argument; and 3) a table of authorities.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and 351.309(d)(1); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs.\10\ If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.\11\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the due date. Documents excepted from the electronic submission requirements must be filed manually (e.g., in paper form) with the APO/ Dockets Unit in Room 18022 and stamped with the date and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the due date. Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\12\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. For any individually examined respondent whose (estimated) ad valorem weighted- average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final results of this review, the Department will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total quantity of those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\13\ The Department will [[Page 21197]] also calculate (estimated) ad valorem importer-specific assessment rates with which to assess whether the per-unit assessment rate is de minimis. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is not zero or de minimis. Where either the respondent's ad valorem weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis,\14\ we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \13\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). \14\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales data submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the rate for the PRC- wide entity.\15\ Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's cash deposit rate) will be liquidated at the rate for the PRC-wide entity.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ Id. \16\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated antidumping duties, where applicable. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For each specific company listed in the final results of review, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review (except, if the ad valorem rate is de minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have received a separate rate in the completed segment of this proceeding for the most recent period, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific cash deposit rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties This administrative review and notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: May 1, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum: 1. Summary 2. Background a. Initiation b. Respondent Selection c. Scope of the Order 3. Discussion of the Methodology a. Preliminary Finding of No Shipments b. Non-Market Economy Country c. Separate Rates d. Weighted-Average Dumping Margin for Non-Examined Separate Rate Companies e. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value Data f. Facts Available for Normal Value g. Date of Sale h. Comparisons to Normal Value i. U.S. Price j. Normal Value k. Currency Conversion 4. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-09143 Filed 5-4-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Notices 21195
regulations and terms of an APO is a the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
violation which is subject to sanction. United States (HTSUS) subheading public document and is made available
This notice is issued and published in 3802.10.00.1 Although the HTSUS to the public via Enforcement and
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and subheading is provided for convenience Compliance’s Antidumping and
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as and customs purposes, the written Countervailing Duty Centralized
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). description of the scope of the order Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
Dated: May 2, 2017. remains dispositive. ACCESS is available to registered users
Gary Taverman,
at https://access.trade.gov, and it is
Preliminary Determination of No
available to all parties in the Central
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Shipments
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
Based on an analysis of U.S. Customs Department of Commerce building. In
Operations.
and Border Protection (CBP) addition, a complete version of the
[FR Doc. 2017–09145 Filed 5–4–17; 8:45 am]
information, and no shipment Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
certifications submitted by Calgon available at http://
Carbon (Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Shanxi Dapu enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
International Trade Co., Ltd., and Preliminary Decision Memorandum and
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Sinoacarbon International Trading Co., the electronic version of the Preliminary
International Trade Administration Ltd., the Department preliminarily Decision Memorandum are identical in
determines that these companies had no content.
[A–570–904] shipments during the POR. For
additional information regarding this Verification
Certain Activated Carbon From the determination, see the Preliminary
People’s Republic of China: As provided in sections 782(i)(3)(A)–
Decision Memorandum. (B) of the Act, we intend to verify the
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Consistent with our practice in non-
Duty Administrative Review; 2015– information upon which we will rely in
market economy (NME) cases, the determining our final results of review
2016 Department is not rescinding this with respect to the two mandatory
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, review, in part, but intends to complete respondents, Jacobi Carbons AB and
International Trade Administration, the review with respect to these Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co.,
Department of Commerce. companies, for which it has Ltd.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from preliminarily found no shipments, and
issue appropriate instructions to CBP Preliminary Results of the Review
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) is based on the final results of the review.2 The Department preliminarily finds
conducting an administrative review of Methodology that 186 companies for which a review
the antidumping duty order on certain was requested did not establish
The Department is conducting this
activated carbon from the People’s eligibility for a separate rate because
review in accordance with section
Republic of China (PRC) for the period they either failed to provide a separate
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
of review (POR) April 1, 2015, through rate application or separate rate
amended (the Act). We calculated
March 31, 2016. The Department certification (SRC).3 As such, we
constructed export prices and export
selected two companies, Jacobi Carbons preliminarily determine that these 186
prices in accordance with section 772 of
AB and Datong Juqiang Activated companies are part of the PRC-wide
the Act. Because the PRC is a NME
Carbon Co., as mandatory respondents entity.4
within the meaning of section 771(18) of
for individual examination. The
the Act, NV has been calculated in
Department preliminarily finds that 3 While Ningxia Guanghua Activated Carbon Co,
accordance with section 773(c) of the Ltd. (Guanghua) submitted a timely SRC, it did not
subject merchandise has been sold in
Act. have any sales to the United States. Additionally,
the United States at prices below normal
For a full description of the we note that Guanghua is part of a single entity
value (NV) during the POR. The with Ningxia Guanghua Cherishmet Activated
methodology underlying our
Department invites interested parties to Carbon Co., Ltd. See ‘‘Separate Rates’’ section of the
conclusions, see the Preliminary
comment on these preliminary results. Preliminary Decision Memorandum; see also,
Decision Memorandum. A list of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Attachment
DATES: Effective May 5, 2017. topics included in the Preliminary I for a complete list of the 186 companies which
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Decision Memorandum is included as were not found eligible for a separate rate.
Palmer or John Anwesen, AD/CVD an appendix to this notice. The 4 Because no interested party requested a review
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement of the PRC-wide entity and the Department no
longer considers the PRC-wide entity as an exporter
and Compliance, International Trade 1 For a complete description of the Scope of the
conditionally subject to administrative reviews, we
Administration, Department of Order, see ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the did not conduct a review of the PRC-wide entity.
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Administrative Review: Certain Activated Carbon
Thus, the rate for the PRC-wide entity is not subject
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: to change as a result of this review. See
from the People’s Republic of China; 2015–2016,’’ Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of
(202) 482–9068, or (202) 482–0131, (Preliminary Decision Memorandum) from Gary Change in Department Practice for Respondent
respectively. Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
for Enforcement and Compliance, issued dated
Scope of the Order FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013). The PRC-
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
wide entity rate of 2.42 U.S. dollars per kilogram
notice.
The merchandise subject to the order 2 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
was last reviewed in Certain Activated Carbon from
is certain activated carbon. The the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
products are currently classifiable under FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011). 2013, 79 FR 70163 (November 25, 2014).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:43 May 04, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM 05MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_21281/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 86 / Friday, May 5, 2017 / Notices 21197
also calculate (estimated) ad valorem existing exporter-specific cash deposit DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
importer-specific assessment rates with rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject
which to assess whether the per-unit merchandise that have not been found National Institute of Standards and
assessment rate is de minimis. We will to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash Technology
instruct CBP to assess antidumping deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-
duties on all appropriate entries covered Call for Industrial Wireless Testbed
wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC
by this review when the importer- Participation
exporters of subject merchandise which
specific ad valorem assessment rate have not received their own separate AGENCY: National Institute of Standards
calculated in the final results of this rate, the cash deposit rate will be the and Technology, Department of
review is not zero or de minimis. Where rate applicable to the PRC exporter that Commerce.
either the respondent’s ad valorem supplied that non-PRC exporter. These ACTION: Notice.
weighted-average dumping margin is cash deposit requirements, when
zero or de minimis, or an importer- SUMMARY: The National Institute of
imposed, shall remain in effect until
specific ad valorem assessment rate is Standards and Technology (NIST), an
further notice.
zero or de minimis,14 we will instruct agency of the United States Department
CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries Notification to Importers of Commerce, announces an
without regard to antidumping duties. opportunity for industrial wireless
For entries that were not reported in This notice also serves as a communications equipment suppliers
the U.S. sales data submitted by preliminary reminder to importers of and academic institutions to incorporate
companies individually examined their responsibility under 19 CFR their use cases, techniques, and
during this review, the Department will 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate equipment into a NIST Industrial
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at regarding the reimbursement of Wireless Testbed to help advance
the rate for the PRC-wide entity.15 antidumping duties prior to liquidation measurement science research in
Additionally, if the Department of the relevant entries during this POR. industrial wireless communication,
determines that an exporter under Failure to comply with this requirement with special emphasis on manufacturing
review had no shipments of the subject could result in the Department’s applications.
merchandise, any suspended entries presumption that reimbursement of DATES: The deadline for responding to
that entered under that exporter’s case antidumping duties occurred and the this opportunity is June 30, 2017.
number (i.e., at that exporter’s cash subsequent assessment of double ADDRESSES: Applications to participate
deposit rate) will be liquidated at the antidumping duties. may be submitted in one of two ways.
rate for the PRC-wide entity.16 • By sending an email to iwslab@
In accordance with section Notification to Interested Parties nist.gov.
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results • By written request:
of this review shall be the basis for the This administrative review and notice
National Institute of Standards and
assessment of antidumping duties on are issued and published in accordance Technology
entries of merchandise covered by the with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of ATTN: Richard Candell, 100 Bureau
final results of this review and for future the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Drive, Stop 8230, Gaithersburg, MD
deposits of estimated antidumping Dated: May 1, 2017. 20899–8615.
duties, where applicable. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Please direct media inquiries to
NIST’s Office of Public Affairs at 301–
Cash Deposit Requirements Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
975–2762.
The following cash deposit and Compliance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick
requirements will be effective upon Appendix Candell, National Institute of Standards
publication of the final results of this and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, MS
administrative review for shipments of List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum: 8230, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, 301–
the subject merchandise from the PRC 975–4287, email: iwslab@nist.gov.
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 1. Summary
2. Background SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of
for consumption on or after the
a. Initiation the NIST Wireless Systems for
publication date, as provided by section
b. Respondent Selection Industrial Environments project, NIST
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For each
c. Scope of the Order has constructed a hardware-in-the-loop
specific company listed in the final
3. Discussion of the Methodology Industrial Wireless Testbed that
results of review, the cash deposit rate
a. Preliminary Finding of No Shipments includes a radio frequency channel
will be equal to the weighted-average
b. Non-Market Economy Country emulator used to recreate the factory
dumping margin established in the final
c. Separate Rates radio environment, and simulated and
results of this review (except, if the ad
d. Weighted-Average Dumping Margin for real factory processes, controls, and
valorem rate is de minimis, then the
Non-Examined Separate Rate Companies equipment. The emulator which is an
cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for
e. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value Intelligent Automation Inc. D–508
previously investigated or reviewed PRC Data emulator supports up to eight (8)
and non-PRC exporters not listed above f. Facts Available for Normal Value devices. Industrial wireless
that have received a separate rate in the g. Date of Sale communication devices are connected
SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
completed segment of this proceeding h. Comparisons to Normal Value to the emulator, and measurement
for the most recent period, the cash i. U.S. Price methods to assess the impacts of various
deposit rate will continue to be the j. Normal Value types of wireless systems on the
k. Currency Conversion performance of simulated factory
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 4. Recommendation
(February 14, 2012). operations will be developed and
14 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). [FR Doc. 2017–09143 Filed 5–4–17; 8:45 am] applied. Participants will include
15 Id.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
researchers from industry and academia
16 Id. interested in supporting the industrial
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:43 May 04, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM 05MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_21281/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-08 08:39:59
Document Modified: 2018-11-08 08:39:59
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective May 5, 2017. | |
| Contact | Bob Palmer or John Anwesen, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-9068, or (202) 482- 0131, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 21195 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR