82 FR 21312 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; New Regulations for Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 87 (May 8, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 87 (May 8, 2017)
| Page Range | 21312-21314 | |
| FR Document | 2017-09184 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 87 (Monday, May 8, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 21312-21314] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-09184] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0454; FRL-9961-25-Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; New Regulations for Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maryland. This revision pertains to a provision establishing new volatile organic compound (VOC) content limits and standards for architectural and industrial maintenance (AIM) coatings available for sale and use in Maryland. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This final rule is effective on June 7, 2017. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID Number EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0454. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through http://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background In 2001, the Ozone Transport Commission (OTC), in collaboration with the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) states, developed several emission reduction measures, including a VOC model rule for AIM coatings (known as the Phase I AIM model rule), which addressed VOC reductions in the OTR. In 2004, consistent with the OTC Phase I AIM model rule, Maryland adopted COMAR 26.11.33--Architectural Coatings, which established VOC content limits, recordkeeping and labeling requirements, and standard practices for use and application of coatings used in architectural and industrial maintenance. The Phase I AIM model rule was replaced with an amended OTC model rule in 2011 (known as the Phase II AIM model rule). The Phase II AIM model rule was developed for states that needed additional VOC emission reductions in order to meet the ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Consistent with the Phase II AIM model rule, Maryland developed and adopted COMAR 26.11.39--Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings, which is an updated version of COMAR 26.11.33. On June 27, 2016, the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) submitted to EPA a SIP revision (16-09) containing new AIM regulations .01 through .08 under COMAR 26.11.39--Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings to be included in the Maryland SIP and requesting removal of COMAR 26.11.33 from the SIP, as COMAR 26.11.39 supercedes COMAR 26.11.33. On November 28, 2016 (81 FR 85455), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) proposing approval of Maryland's new AIM regulations. II. Summary of SIP Revision The new AIM regulations apply to any person who manufactures, blends, thins, supplies, sells, offers for sale, repackages for sale, or applies architectural and industrial maintenance coatings in Maryland. Maryland's new AIM regulations establish more stringent VOC content limits (Table 1) and standards for AIM coating categories than in COMAR 26.11.33, as well as establish container labeling requirements, reporting requirements, and compliance procedures. The requirements of COMAR 26.11.39 supersede those of COMAR 26.11.33. Other specific requirements and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained in the NPR and technical support document for this rulemaking and will not be restated here. No public comments were received on the NPR. Table 1--VOC Content Limits Under COMAR 26.11.39 for Various AIM Coating Categories ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Maryland's new VOC content Architectural and industrial maintenance coatings limits (grams/ category liter) under COMAR 26.11.39 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flat coatings........................................... 50 Non-flat coatings....................................... 100 Non-flat--high gloss coatings........................... 150 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Specialty Coatings ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Aluminum roof coatings.................................. 450 Basement specialty coatings............................. 400 Bituminous roof coatings................................ 270 Bituminous roof primers................................. 350 Bond breakers........................................... 350 Calcimine recoater...................................... 475 Concrete curing compounds............................... 350 Concrete/masonry sealers................................ 100 Concrete surface retarders.............................. 780 Conjugated oil varnish.................................. 450 Conversion varnish...................................... 725 Driveway sealers........................................ 50 Dry fog coatings........................................ 150 Faux finishing coatings................................. 350 Fire-resistive coatings................................. 350 Floor coatings.......................................... 100 Form-release coatings................................... 250 Graphic arts coatings (Sign paints)..................... 500 High-temperature coatings............................... 420 Impacted immersion coatings............................. 780 Industrial maintenance coatings......................... 250 Low-solids coatings..................................... 120 Magnesite cement coatings............................... 450 Mastic texture coatings................................. 100 Metallic pigmented coatings............................. 500 Multi-color coatings.................................... 250 Nuclear coatings........................................ 450 Pre-treatment wash primers.............................. 420 Primers, sealers, and undercoaters...................... 100 Reactive penetrating sealers............................ 350 Reactive penetrating carbonate stone sealers............ 500 Recycled coatings....................................... 250 Roof coatings........................................... 250 Rust preventative coatings.............................. 250 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shellacs ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Clear................................................... 730 Opaque.................................................. 550 Specialty primers, sealers, and undercoaters............ 100 Stains.................................................. 250 Stone consolidant....................................... 450 Swimming pool coatings.................................. 340 Thermoplastic rubber coatings and mastic................ 550 Traffic marking coatings................................ 100 Tub and tile refinish coatings.......................... 420 Waterproofing membranes................................. 250 Wood coatings........................................... 275 Wood preservatives...................................... 350 Zinc-rich primers....................................... 340 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Page 21313]] III. Final Action EPA is approving Maryland's June 27, 2016 SIP submittal with new regulations for AIM coatings under COMAR 26.11.39, and adding these regulations to the Maryland SIP. With this approval, EPA is also removing COMAR 26.11.33 from the Maryland SIP. COMAR 26.11.39 establishes VOC content limits and requirements for certain AIM coating categories which are more stringent than limits previously found in COMAR 26.11.33. Therefore, EPA believes these new regulations in the SIP strengthen the Maryland SIP and should lead to additional VOC reductions, which will reduce ozone formation and assist Maryland with attaining and maintaining the ozone NAAQS. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Maryland's new regulations for AIM coatings in COMAR 26.11.39. Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\ EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through http://www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region III Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. General Requirements Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). C. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 7, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action pertaining to Maryland's new regulations for AIM coatings under COMAR 26.11.39 may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: March 5, 2017. Cecil Rodrigues, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart V--Maryland 0 2. In Sec. 52.1070, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by: 0 a. Removing the heading ``26.11.33 Architectural Coatings'' and the entries ``26.11.33.01-26.11.33.14.'' 0 b. Adding the heading ``26.11.39 Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings'' and the entries ``26.11.39.01- 26.11.39.08'' in numerical order. The additions read as follows: Sec. 52.1070 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * [[Page 21314]] EPA--Approved Regulations, Technical Memoranda, and Statutes in the Maryland SIP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Code of Maryland administrative State Additional explanation/ citation at regulations (COMAR) citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date 40 CFR 52.1100 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26.11.39 Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26.11.39.01...................... Applicability and 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal Register Exemptions. citation]. 26.11.39.02...................... Test Methods- 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal Register Incorporation by citation]. Reference. 26.11.39.03...................... Definitions.............. 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal Register citation]. 26.11.39.04...................... General Requirements and 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal Register Standards. citation]. 26.11.39.05...................... VOC Content Limits....... 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal Register citation]. 26.11.39.06...................... Container Labeling 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal Register Requirements. citation]. 26.11.39.07...................... Reporting Requirements... 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal Register citation]. 26.11.39.08...................... Compliance Procedures.... 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal Register citation]. * * * * * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * [FR Doc. 2017-09184 Filed 5-5-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![21312 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 87 / Monday, May 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
* * * * * addressed VOC reductions in the OTR. TABLE 1—VOC CONTENT LIMITS
In 2004, consistent with the OTC Phase
[FR Doc. 2017–09176 Filed 5–5–17; 8:45 am] UNDER COMAR 26.11.39 FOR VAR-
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P I AIM model rule, Maryland adopted IOUS AIM COATING CATEGORIES
COMAR 26.11.33—Architectural
Coatings, which established VOC Maryland’s
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION content limits, recordkeeping and new VOC
AGENCY Architectural and industrial content limits
labeling requirements, and standard maintenance coatings (grams/liter)
practices for use and application of category
40 CFR Part 52 under COMAR
coatings used in architectural and 26.11.39
[EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0454; FRL–9961–25– industrial maintenance.
Region 3] Flat coatings ......................... 50
The Phase I AIM model rule was Non-flat coatings ................... 100
Approval and Promulgation of Air replaced with an amended OTC model Non-flat—high gloss coatings 150
Quality Implementation Plans; rule in 2011 (known as the Phase II AIM
Maryland; New Regulations for model rule). The Phase II AIM model Specialty Coatings
Architectural and Industrial rule was developed for states that
Maintenance Coatings Aluminum roof coatings ........ 450
needed additional VOC emission
Basement specialty coatings 400
AGENCY: Environmental Protection reductions in order to meet the ozone Bituminous roof coatings ...... 270
Agency (EPA). national ambient air quality standards Bituminous roof primers ....... 350
ACTION: Final rule. (NAAQS). Consistent with the Phase II Bond breakers ...................... 350
AIM model rule, Maryland developed Calcimine recoater ................ 475
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection and adopted COMAR 26.11.39— Concrete curing compounds 350
Agency (EPA) is approving a state Architectural and Industrial Concrete/masonry sealers .... 100
implementation plan (SIP) revision Maintenance Coatings, which is an Concrete surface retarders ... 780
submitted by the State of Maryland. updated version of COMAR 26.11.33. Conjugated oil varnish .......... 450
This revision pertains to a provision Conversion varnish ............... 725
establishing new volatile organic On June 27, 2016, the Maryland Driveway sealers .................. 50
compound (VOC) content limits and Department of the Environment (MDE) Dry fog coatings ................... 150
standards for architectural and submitted to EPA a SIP revision (16–09) Faux finishing coatings ......... 350
industrial maintenance (AIM) coatings containing new AIM regulations .01 Fire-resistive coatings ........... 350
available for sale and use in Maryland. through .08 under COMAR 26.11.39— Floor coatings ....................... 100
Architectural and Industrial Form-release coatings .......... 250
This action is being taken under the
Maintenance Coatings to be included in Graphic arts coatings (Sign
Clean Air Act (CAA). paints) ............................... 500
DATES: This final rule is effective on the Maryland SIP and requesting High-temperature coatings ... 420
June 7, 2017. removal of COMAR 26.11.33 from the Impacted immersion coatings 780
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a SIP, as COMAR 26.11.39 supercedes Industrial maintenance coat-
docket for this action under Docket ID COMAR 26.11.33. On November 28, ings .................................... 250
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0454. All 2016 (81 FR 85455), EPA published a Low-solids coatings .............. 120
documents in the docket are listed on notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) Magnesite cement coatings .. 450
the http://www.regulations.gov Web proposing approval of Maryland’s new Mastic texture coatings ......... 100
site. Although listed in the index, some AIM regulations. Metallic pigmented coatings 500
Multi-color coatings ............... 250
information is not publicly available,
II. Summary of SIP Revision Nuclear coatings ................... 450
e.g., confidential business information Pre-treatment wash primers 420
(CBI) or other information whose The new AIM regulations apply to Primers, sealers, and
disclosure is restricted by statute. any person who manufactures, blends, undercoaters ..................... 100
Certain other material, such as thins, supplies, sells, offers for sale, Reactive penetrating sealers 350
copyrighted material, is not placed on repackages for sale, or applies Reactive penetrating car-
the internet and will be publicly architectural and industrial bonate stone sealers ........ 500
available only in hard copy form. maintenance coatings in Maryland. Recycled coatings ................ 250
Publicly available docket materials are Roof coatings ........................ 250
Maryland’s new AIM regulations Rust preventative coatings ... 250
available through http://
establish more stringent VOC content
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER limits (Table 1) and standards for AIM Shellacs
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
coating categories than in COMAR
26.11.33, as well as establish container Clear ..................................... 730
additional availability information. Opaque ................................. 550
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
labeling requirements, reporting
Specialty primers, sealers,
Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by requirements, and compliance
and undercoaters .............. 100
email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov. procedures. The requirements of Stains .................................... 250
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
COMAR 26.11.39 supersede those of Stone consolidant ................. 450
COMAR 26.11.33. Other specific Swimming pool coatings ....... 340
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Background requirements and the rationale for EPA’s Thermoplastic rubber coat-
In 2001, the Ozone Transport proposed action are explained in the ings and mastic ................. 550
Commission (OTC), in collaboration NPR and technical support document Traffic marking coatings ....... 100
with the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) for this rulemaking and will not be Tub and tile refinish coatings 420
Waterproofing membranes ... 250
states, developed several emission restated here. No public comments were
Wood coatings ...................... 275
reduction measures, including a VOC received on the NPR. Wood preservatives .............. 350
model rule for AIM coatings (known as Zinc-rich primers ................... 340
the Phase I AIM model rule), which
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:08 May 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\08MYR1.SGM 08MYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_21399/page/1.svg)
![21314 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 87 / Monday, May 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
EPA—APPROVED REGULATIONS, TECHNICAL MEMORANDA, AND STATUTES IN THE MARYLAND SIP
Code of Maryland Additional explanation/
administrative State effective
Title/subject EPA approval date citation at 40 CFR
regulations date 52.1100
(COMAR) citation
* * * * * * *
26.11.39 Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings
26.11.39.01 ................ Applicability and Exemptions ........................ 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal
Register citation].
26.11.39.02 ................ Test Methods-Incorporation by Reference ... 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal
Register citation].
26.11.39.03 ................ Definitions ...................................................... 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal
Register citation].
26.11.39.04 ................ General Requirements and Standards ......... 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal
Register citation].
26.11.39.05 ................ VOC Content Limits ...................................... 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal
Register citation].
26.11.39.06 ................ Container Labeling Requirements ................ 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal
Register citation].
26.11.39.07 ................ Reporting Requirements ............................... 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal
Register citation].
26.11.39.08 ................ Compliance Procedures ................................ 4/25/16 5/8/17, [insert Federal
Register citation].
* * * * * * *
* * * * * 11, 2017. Therefore, NMFS is reopening by the Gulf of Mexico and South
[FR Doc. 2017–09184 Filed 5–5–17; 8:45 am] the western, northern, and southern Atlantic Fishery Management Councils
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P (gillnet) zones of the Gulf EEZ because and is implemented by NMFS under the
there is available king mackerel authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
commercial quota to harvest in these Fishery Conservation and Management
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE zones at 12:01 a.m., local time, on May Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by
11, 2017, through the end of the regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric respective 2016–2017 fishing year or Under 50 CFR 622.388(a)(1), NMFS is
Administration until the applicable commercial quotas required to close the king mackerel
are reached, whichever happens first. commercial sector for the applicable
50 CFR Part 622 NMFS intends through this temporary zone or gear type for the remainder of
[Docket No. 160426363–7275–02] rule to maximize harvest benefits for the the fishing year if landings reach, or are
king mackerel commercial sector in the projected to reach, the applicable
RIN 0648–XF351 Gulf by allowing the commercial quotas commercial quotas by filing a
Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources to be caught. notification to that effect with the Office
of the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic DATES: This rule is effective for the of the Federal Register. With the
Region; Reopening of the Commercial western, northern, and southern (gillnet) exception of the Florida east coast
Sector in the Western, Northern, and zones in the Gulf EEZ at 12:01 a.m., subzone, NMFS previously projected
Southern (Gillnet) Zones for King local time, on May 11, 2017. Unless that the commercial quotas for Gulf
Mackerel in the Gulf of Mexico changed by subsequent notification in migratory group king mackerel (Gulf
the Federal Register, the effectiveness of king mackerel) would be reached for
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries this temporary rule continues until each of the other zones and published
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 12:01 a.m., local time, on July 1, 2017, temporary rules to close the zones to
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), for the western and southern (gillnet) commercial harvest in the Gulf EEZ
Commerce. zones, and for the northern zone, the prior to the end of the 2016–2017
ACTION: Temporary rule; reopening. effectiveness continues until 12:01 a.m., fishing years.
local time, on October 1, 2017. On October 14, 2016, NMFS closed
SUMMARY: NMFS reopens the
commercial sector for king mackerel in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the commercial sector for king mackerel
the western and northern zones, and the Kelli O’Donnell, NMFS Southeast in the western zone (81 FR 71410,
run-around gillnet component in the Regional Office, phone: 727–824–5305, October 17, 2016).
southern zone of the Gulf of Mexico email: kelli.odonnell@noaa.gov. On November 10, 2016, NMFS closed
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(Gulf) exclusive economic zone (EEZ) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The the commercial sector for king mackerel
through this temporary rule. NMFS fishery for coastal migratory pelagic fish in the Florida west coast northern
recently published a final rule that includes king mackerel, Spanish subzone of the eastern zone (81 FR
modified the zones and annual catch mackerel, and cobia, and is managed 78941, November 10, 2016).
limits (ACLs) for king mackerel in the under the Fishery Management Plan for On February 10, 2017, NMFS closed
Gulf EEZ, which increased the the Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources the commercial sector for king mackerel
commercial quotas for king mackerel. of the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic in the Florida west coast southern
This final rule will be effective on May Region (FMP). The FMP was prepared subzone of the eastern zone for run-
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 May 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\08MYR1.SGM 08MYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_21399/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-05-06 02:22:03
Document Modified: 2017-05-06 02:22:03
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This final rule is effective on June 7, 2017. | |
| Contact | Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 21312 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR