82 FR 22074 - Safety Zone; Main Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 91 (May 12, 2017)

Page Range		22074-22076
FR Document		2017-09633

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the Main Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL. This action is necessary and intended to ensure safety of life on the navigable waters of the United States immediately prior to, during, and after a bridge based pyrotechnics display. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 91 (Friday, May 12, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 91 (Friday, May 12, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22074-22076]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0196]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Main Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
Main Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL. This action is necessary 
and intended to ensure safety of life on the navigable waters of the 
United States immediately prior to, during, and after a bridge based 
pyrotechnics display. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is 
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port 
Lake Michigan.

DATES: This rule is effective from 7:45 p.m. to 8:15 p.m. on May 20, 
2017.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0196 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule, 
call or email LT Lindsay Cook, Marine Safety Unit Chicago, U.S. Coast 
Guard; telephone (630) 986-2155, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable. The 
Coast Guard did not receive the final details for this event until 
there was insufficient time remaining before the event to publish a 
NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date of this rule to wait for a 
comment period to run would be impracticable because it would inhibit 
the Coast Guard's ability to protect the public and vessels from the 
hazards associated with a bridge based fireworks display on May 20, 
2017.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making this temporary rule 
effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. 
For the same reasons discussed in the preceding paragraph, waiting for 
a 30 day notice period to run would be impracticable.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to 
establish safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 160.5; 
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    On May 20, 2017, a bridge based pyrotechnics display will take 
place on the Main Branch of the Chicago River between the Wells Street 
Bridge and the Dearborn Street Bridge in Chicago, IL. The Captain of 
the Port Lake Michigan has determined that the pyrotechnics display 
will pose a significant risk to public safety and property. Such 
hazards include premature and accidental detonations, falling and 
burning debris, and collisions among spectator vessels.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port 
Lake

[[Page 22075]]

Michigan has determined that this temporary safety zone is necessary to 
ensure the safety of the public during the bridge based pyrotechnics 
display on the Main Branch of the Chicago River. This safety zone will 
be enforced from 7:45 p.m. to 8:15 p.m. on May 20, 2017. This zone will 
encompass all waters of the Main Branch of the Chicago River between 
the Wells Street Bridge and the Dearborn Street Bridge in Chicago, IL.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, 
or a designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or a 
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing 
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs''), directs agencies to 
reduce regulation and control regulatory costs and provides that ``for 
every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be 
identified for elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be 
prudently managed and controlled through a budgeting process.'' This 
rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under 
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the 
Office of Management and Budget.
    As this rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule is 
exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's 
Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the 
Executive Order of January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing Regulation and 
Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action 
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy, 
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the 
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel 
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be 
relatively small and enforced May 20, 2017 from 7:45 p.m. to 8:15 p.m. 
Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through 
the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of the Port.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered the impact of this temporary rule on small entities. This 
rule will affect the following entities, some of which might be small 
entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit on a 
portion of the Main Branch of the Chicago River on May 20, 2017 from 
7:45 p.m. to 8:15 p.m.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the reasons cited in the 
Regulatory Planning and Review section. Additionally, before the 
enforcement of the zone, we will issue local Broadcast Notice to 
Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners so vessel owners and operators 
can plan accordingly.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in

[[Page 22076]]

complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 
4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category 
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This rule involves the establishment 
of a safety zone for a bridge based pyrotechnics display on the Main 
Branch of the Chicago River in Chicago, IL. It is categorically 
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the 
Commandant Instruction. A Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) 
supporting this determination is available in the docket where 
indicated in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any 
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record 
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0196 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0196  Safety Zone; Main Branch of the Chicago River, 
Chicago, IL.

    (a) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of the Main Branch of the 
Chicago River, between the Wells Street Bridge and Dearborn Street 
Bridge in Chicago, IL.
    (b) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced on May 20, 2017 
from 7:45 p.m. to 8:15 p.m.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within 
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a designated 
on-scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port Lake 
Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to act on 
his or her behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Lake Michigan or an on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF 
Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in 
the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the 
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or an on-scene representative.

    Dated: May 5, 2017.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2017-09633 Filed 5-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 91 / Friday, May 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 22075

Michigan has determined that this interfere with other agencies, will not annually and rates each agency’s
temporary safety zone is necessary to adversely alter the budget of any grant responsiveness to small business. If you
ensure the safety of the public during or loan recipients, and will not raise any wish to comment on actions by
the bridge based pyrotechnics display novel legal or policy issues. The safety employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
on the Main Branch of the Chicago zone created by this rule will be 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
River. This safety zone will be enforced relatively small and enforced May 20, Coast Guard will not retaliate against
from 7:45 p.m. to 8:15 p.m. on May 20, 2017 from 7:45 p.m. to 8:15 p.m. Under small entities that question or complain
2017. This zone will encompass all certain conditions, moreover, vessels about this rule or any policy or action
waters of the Main Branch of the may still transit through the safety zone of the Coast Guard.
Chicago River between the Wells Street when permitted by the Captain of the
Bridge and the Dearborn Street Bridge in Port. C. Collection of Information
Chicago, IL. This rule will not call for a new
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring B. Impact on Small Entities collection of information under the
within the safety zone is prohibited The Regulatory Flexibility Act of Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
unless authorized by the Captain of the 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Port Lake Michigan, or a designated on- requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
scene representative. The Captain of the
Port or a designated on-scene small entities during rulemaking. The Governments
representative may be contacted via term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small A rule has implications for federalism
VHF Channel 16. businesses, not-for-profit organizations under Executive order 13132,
that are independently owned and Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
V. Regulatory Analyses operated and are not dominant in their effect on the States, on the relationship
We developed this rule after fields, and governmental jurisdictions between the national government and
considering numerous statutes and with populations of less than 50,000. the States, or on the distribution of
Executive orders related to rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. power and responsibilities among the
Below we summarize our analyses 605(b) that this rule will not have a various levels of government. We have
based on a number of these statutes and significant economic impact on a analyzed this rule under that Order and
Executive orders, and we discuss First substantial number of small entities. have determined that it is consistent
Amendment rights of protestors. Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act with the fundamental federalism
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered principles and preemption requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review the impact of this temporary rule on described in Executive order 13132.
Executive orders 12866 and 13563 small entities. This rule will affect the Also, this rule does not have tribal
direct agencies to assess the costs and following entities, some of which might implications under Executive order
benefits of available regulatory be small entities: The owners or 13175, Consultation and Coordination
alternatives and, if regulation is operators of vessels intending to transit with Indian Tribal Governments,
necessary, to select regulatory on a portion of the Main Branch of the because it does not have a substantial
approaches that maximize net benefits. Chicago River on May 20, 2017 from direct effect on one or more Indian
Executive order 13563 emphasizes the 7:45 p.m. to 8:15 p.m. tribes, on the relationship between the
importance of quantifying both costs This safety zone will not have a Federal Government and Indian tribes,
and benefits, of reducing costs, of significant economic impact on a or on the distribution of power and
harmonizing rules, and of promoting substantial number of small entities for responsibilities between the Federal
flexibility. Executive Order 13771 the reasons cited in the Regulatory Government and Indian tribes. If you
(‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling Planning and Review section. believe this rule has implications for
Regulatory Costs’’), directs agencies to Additionally, before the enforcement of federalism or Indian tribes, please
reduce regulation and control regulatory the zone, we will issue local Broadcast contact the person listed in the FOR
costs and provides that ‘‘for every one Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
new regulation issued, at least two prior Mariners so vessel owners and operators above.
regulations be identified for elimination, can plan accordingly.
and that the cost of planned regulations Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
be prudently managed and controlled Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
through a budgeting process.’’ This rule Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
has not been designated a ‘‘significant we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of
regulatory action,’’ under Executive understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In
Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not would affect your small business, particular, the Act addresses actions
been reviewed by the Office of organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a
Management and Budget. jurisdiction and you have questions State, local, or tribal government, in the
As this rule is not a significant concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of
regulatory action, this rule is exempt compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
from the requirements of Executive listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure,
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule
Section 2 of the Executive Order of on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES

January 30, 2017 titled ‘Reducing who enforce, or otherwise determine
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017). the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under
We conclude that this rule is not a Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security
significant regulatory action because we and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and
anticipate that it will have minimal Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
impact on the economy, will not Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 May 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM 12MYR1

22076 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 91 / Friday, May 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

complying with the National Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a made a submittal addressing the
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 designated on-scene representative. infrastructure requirements for the 2012
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have (2) This safety zone is closed to all fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS,
determined that this action is one of a vessel traffic, except as may be and EPA is approving portions of this
category of actions that do not permitted by the Captain of the Port SIP revision in accordance with the
individually or cumulatively have a Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene requirements of the CAA.
significant effect on the human representative. DATES: This final rule is effective on
environment. This rule involves the (3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of June 12, 2017.
establishment of a safety zone for a the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
bridge based pyrotechnics display on is any Coast Guard commissioned, docket for this action under Docket ID
the Main Branch of the Chicago River in warrant or petty officer who has been Number EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0373. All
Chicago, IL. It is categorically excluded designated by the Captain of the Port documents in the docket are listed on
from further review under paragraph Lake Michigan to act on his or her the www.regulations.gov Web site.
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant behalf. Although listed in the index, some
Instruction. A Record of Environmental (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter information is not publicly available,
Consideration (REC) supporting this or operate within the safety zone shall e.g., confidential business information
determination is available in the docket contact the Captain of the Port Lake (CBI) or other information whose
where indicated in the ADDRESSES Michigan or an on-scene representative disclosure is restricted by statute.
section of this preamble. We seek any to obtain permission to do so. The Certain other material, such as
comments or information that may lead Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an copyrighted material, is not placed on
to the discovery of a significant on-scene representative may be the Internet and will be publicly
environmental impact from this rule. contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel available only in hard copy form.
operators given permission to enter or Publicly available docket materials are
G. Protest Activities
operate in the safety zone must comply available through http://
The Coast Guard respects the First with all directions given to them by the www.regulations.gov, or please contact
Amendment rights of protesters. Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or an the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
Protesters are asked to contact the on-scene representative. INFORMATION CONTACT section for
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
Dated: May 5, 2017. additional availability information.
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
A.B. Cocanour, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Ellen Schmitt, (215) 814–5787, or by
jeopardizing the safety or security of Port, Lake Michigan. email at schmitt.ellen@epa.gov.
people, places or vessels. [FR Doc. 2017–09633 Filed 5–11–17; 8:45 am] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 I. Background
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation On July 16, 1997, the EPA
(water), Reporting and record keeping ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION promulgated a new 24-hour and a new
requirements, Security measures, AGENCY annual NAAQS for PM2.5. See 62 FR
Waterways. 38652 (July 18, 1997). Subsequently, on
For the reasons discussed in the 40 CFR Part 52 December 14, 2012, the EPA revised the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 level of the health based (primary)
[EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0373; FRL–9961–87–
CFR part 165 as follows: Region 3] annual PM2.5 standard to 12 micrograms
per cubic meter (mg/m3). See 78 FR 3086
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION Approval and Promulgation of Air (January 15, 2013).1
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS Quality Implementation Plans; West Pursuant to section 110(a)(1) of the
Virginia; Infrastructure Requirements CAA, states are required to submit SIPs
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 for the 2012 Fine Particulate Standard meeting the applicable requirements of
continues to read as follows: section 110(a)(2) within three years after
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; AGENCY: Environmental Protection promulgation of a new or revised
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Agency (EPA). NAAQS or within such shorter period
Department of Homeland Security Delegation ACTION: Final rule. as EPA may prescribe. Section 110(a)(2)
No. 0170.1. requires states to address basic SIP
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection elements such as requirements for
■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0196 to read as
Agency (EPA) is approving portions of monitoring, basic program
follows:
a state implementation plan (SIP) requirements, and legal authority that
§ 165.T09–0196 Safety Zone; Main Branch revision submitted by the State of West are designed to assure attainment and
of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL. Virginia. Whenever new or revised maintenance of the NAAQS. Section
(a) Location. All U.S. navigable waters national ambient air quality standards 110(a) imposes the obligation upon
of the Main Branch of the Chicago River, (NAAQS) are promulgated, the Clean states to make a SIP submission to EPA
between the Wells Street Bridge and Air Act (CAA) requires states to submit for a new or revised NAAQS, but the
Dearborn Street Bridge in Chicago, IL. a plan to address basic program contents of that submission may vary
(b) Enforcement period. This rule will elements, including, but not limited to, depending upon the facts and
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES

be enforced on May 20, 2017 from 7:45 regulatory structure, monitoring,
p.m. to 8:15 p.m. modeling, legal authority, and adequate 1 In EPA’s 2012 PM
2.5 NAAQS revision, EPA left
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with resources necessary to assure unchanged the existing welfare (secondary)
the general regulations in § 165.23 of implementation, maintenance, and standards for PM2.5 to address PM related effects
such as visibility impairment, ecological effects,
this part, entry into, transiting, or enforcement of the NAAQS. These damage to materials and climate impacts. This
anchoring within this safety zone is elements are referred to as infrastructure includes a secondary annual standard of 15 mg/m3
prohibited unless authorized by the requirements. The State of West Virginia and a 24-hour standard of 35 mg/m3.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 May 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM 12MYR1

Document Created: 2017-05-12 01:09:23
Document Modified: 2017-05-12 01:09:23

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 7:45 p.m. to 8:15 p.m. on May 20, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions about this rule, call or email LT Lindsay Cook, Marine Safety Unit Chicago, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (630) 986-2155, email D09-DG-MSUChicago- [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 22074
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Record Keeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

82 FR 22074 - Safety Zone; Main Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 91 (May 12, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard