82 FR 22086 - Air Plan Approval; North Carolina Repeal of Transportation Facilities Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 91 (May 12, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 91 (May 12, 2017)
| Page Range | 22086-22088 | |
| FR Document | 2017-09539 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 91 (Friday, May 12, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 22086-22088] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-09539] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0614; FRL-9961-74-Region 4] Air Plan Approval; North Carolina Repeal of Transportation Facilities Rules AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking action to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision, submitted by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality through the Division of Air Quality (DAQ) on September 16, 2016, for the purpose of removing the statewide transportation facilities rules. The State provided a Clean Air Act section 110(l) noninterference demonstration establishing that removal of the North Carolina transportation facilities rules will not interfere with the maintenance of the 8-hour carbon monoxide standard or any other national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). EPA is approving this SIP revision because the DAQ has demonstrated that it is consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). DATES: This direct final rule is effective July 11, 2017 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by June 12, 2017. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04- OAR-2016-0614 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404) 562-9222. Ms. Sheckler can also be reached via electronic mail at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background In 1978, EPA designated Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (hereinafter the ``Charlotte Area'') as nonattainment for the NAAQS for carbon monoxide (CO). Then, under the CAA amendments of 1990, the Charlotte Area was designated as ``not-classifiable'' and had five years to attain the CO NAAQS (i.e., November 15, 1995). On November 15, 1990, Durham and Wake Counties (hereinafter the ``Raleigh-Durham/Chapel Hill Area'') and Forsyth County (hereinafter the ``Winston-Salem Area'') in North Carolina were designated as ``moderate'' nonattainment and had until December 31, 1995, to attain the standard. In April 1994, DAQ submitted a request to EPA to redesignate the Winston-Salem Area to attainment status, and in November 1994, EPA approved the maintenance plan for CO (59 FR 48402), and redesignated the area to attainment/maintenance for CO. Next, in 1995, EPA approved the Charlotte and Raleigh-Durham/Chapel Hill Areas' maintenance plans for CO and redesignated the area to attainment/maintenance for CO (60 FR 39262). In [[Page 22087]] 2015, these areas completed the 20-year maintenance periods, and EPA redesignated them to attainment. North Carolina adopted the transportation facility rules on November 15, 1973, pursuant to the federal requirement (40 CFR part 51.18) to control emissions from indirect (complex) sources. North Carolina identifies transportation facilities as complex sources in its rules (N.C.G.S. 143-213(22)) and includes any facilities that cause increased emissions from motor vehicles. In 1974, EPA suspended the indirect source review programs, including 40 CFR part 51.18. The 1977 CAA amendments codified this suspension in section 110(a)(5)(A)(i); this suspension allowed states to include indirect source review regulations in their State Implementation Plans (61 FR 3584; 62 FR 41277; 63 FR 72193; 64 FR 61213), but EPA could not require them as a condition of its approval of the SIP. In 2013, the North Carolina General Assembly enacted Session Law 2013-2014 that sought to streamline the regulatory process and eliminate unnecessary regulation. The State Environmental Management Commission recommended repealing the transportation facility rules in 15A NCAC 02D .0800--Complex Sources and 02Q .0600--Transportation Facilities Procedures. The transportation facility rules are aimed at addressing CO emissions, and North Carolina does not have any CO nonattainment areas. As a result, DAQ proposes to repeal the transportation facilities rule. II. Analysis of State's Submittal Section 110(l) of the CAA requires that a revision to the SIP not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (RFP) (as defined in section 171), or any other applicable requirement of the Act. EPA evaluates each section 110(l) noninterference demonstration on a case-by-case basis considering the circumstances of each SIP revision. DAQ provided a demonstration that shows that the repeal of the statewide North Carolina transportation facilities rules will not interfere with the maintenance of the CO standards or any other NAAQS or other CAA requirement. The rules, which are focused on addressing CO emissions, offer no environmental benefit to the State now that it no longer has any CO nonattainment areas. The Charlotte, Raleigh-Durham/Chapel Hill and Winston-Salem Areas have been redesignated to maintenance (60 FR 39262 and 59 FR 48402), and the monitoring data for CO in 2016 shows that all three areas are well below the 8-hour CO standard. The complex sources (transportation facilities) rules do not set requirements for any other NAAQS, including ozone, particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and lead, and therefore, removing the transportation facilities rules in 15A NCAC 02D .0800--Complex Sources and 02Q .0600-- Transportation Facilities Procedures would not result in violations of the NAAQS. III. Final Action EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to remove 15A NCAC 02D .0800--Complex Sources and 02Q .0600--Transportation Facilities Procedures, from the SIP for North Carolina. EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective July 11, 2017 without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by June 12, 2017. If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on July 11, 2017 and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it [[Page 22088]] is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 11, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: March 31, 2017. V. Anne Heard, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 0 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart II--North Carolina Sec. 52.1770 [Amended] 0 2. Section 52.1770(c), Table 1 is amended: 0 a. Under ``Subchapter 2D Air Pollution Control Requirements'' by removing the heading ``Section .0800 Complex Sources'' and the entries ``Sect .0801'' through ``Sect .0806''; and 0 b. Under ``Subchapter 2Q Air Quality Permits'' by removing the heading ``Section .0600 Transportation Facility Procedures'' and the entries ``Sect .0601'' through ``Sect .0607''. [FR Doc. 2017-09539 Filed 5-11-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![22086 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 91 / Friday, May 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
PART 52—APPROVAL AND Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. § 52.670 Identification of plan.
PROMULGATION OF * * * * *
Subpart N—Idaho
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (c) * * *
■ 2. In § 52.670, the table in paragraph
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 (c) is amended by revising entries ‘‘107’’
continues to read as follows: and ‘‘200’’ to read as follows:
EPA-APPROVED IDAHO REGULATIONS AND STATUTES
State EPA
State citation Title/subject effective approval Explanations
date date
Idaho Administrative Procedures Act (IDAPA) 58.01.01—Rules for the Control of Air Pollution in Idaho
* * * * * * *
107 ................... Incorporation by Ref- 3/25/2016, 3/20/2014, 5/12/2017, [insert Fed- Except Section 107.03.f through 107.03.p, and
erence. 3/30/2007, 7/1/1997, eral Register cita- with respect to 107.03.a the incorporation by
5/1/1994. tion]. reference of 40 CFR 51.165.
* * * * * * *
200 ................... Procedures and Re- 3/25/2016 ..................... 5/12/2017, [insert Fed-
quirements for Per- eral Register cita-
mits to Construct. tion].
* * * * * * *
* * * * * DATES: This direct final rule is effective Management Section, Air Planning and
[FR Doc. 2017–09542 Filed 5–11–17; 8:45 am] July 11, 2017 without further notice, Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P unless EPA receives adverse comment and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
by June 12, 2017. If EPA receives such Environmental Protection Agency,
comments, it will publish a timely Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
AGENCY Federal Register and inform the public telephone number is (404) 562–9222.
that the rule will not take effect. Ms. Sheckler can also be reached via
40 CFR Part 52 electronic mail at sheckler.kelly@
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
epa.gov.
[EPA–R04–OAR–2016–0614; FRL–9961–74– identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
Region 4] OAR–2016–0614 at https:// SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online I. Background
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina instructions for submitting comments.
Repeal of Transportation Facilities Once submitted, comments cannot be In 1978, EPA designated Mecklenburg
Rules edited or removed from Regulations.gov. County, North Carolina (hereinafter the
EPA may publish any comment received ‘‘Charlotte Area’’) as nonattainment for
AGENCY: Environmental Protection the NAAQS for carbon monoxide (CO).
to its public docket. Do not submit
Agency (EPA). Then, under the CAA amendments of
electronically any information you
ACTION: Direct final rule. consider to be Confidential Business 1990, the Charlotte Area was designated
Information (CBI) or other information as ‘‘not-classifiable’’ and had five years
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental to attain the CO NAAQS (i.e., November
Protection Agency (EPA) is taking action whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
15, 1995). On November 15, 1990,
to approve a State Implementation Plan Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
Durham and Wake Counties (hereinafter
(SIP) revision, submitted by the North etc.) must be accompanied by a written
the ‘‘Raleigh-Durham/Chapel Hill
Carolina Department of Environmental comment. The written comment is
Area’’) and Forsyth County (hereinafter
Quality through the Division of Air considered the official comment and
the ‘‘Winston-Salem Area’’) in North
Quality (DAQ) on September 16, 2016, should include discussion of all points
Carolina were designated as ‘‘moderate’’
for the purpose of removing the you wish to make. EPA will generally
nonattainment and had until December
statewide transportation facilities rules. not consider comments or comment
31, 1995, to attain the standard.
The State provided a Clean Air Act contents located outside of the primary In April 1994, DAQ submitted a
section 110(l) noninterference submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or request to EPA to redesignate the
demonstration establishing that removal other file sharing system). For Winston-Salem Area to attainment
of the North Carolina transportation additional submission methods, the full status, and in November 1994, EPA
facilities rules will not interfere with the EPA public comment policy, approved the maintenance plan for CO
information about CBI or multimedia
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
maintenance of the 8-hour carbon (59 FR 48402), and redesignated the area
monoxide standard or any other submissions, and general guidance on to attainment/maintenance for CO. Next,
national ambient air quality standards making effective comments, please visit in 1995, EPA approved the Charlotte
(NAAQS). EPA is approving this SIP https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ and Raleigh-Durham/Chapel Hill Areas’
revision because the DAQ has commenting-epa-dockets. maintenance plans for CO and
demonstrated that it is consistent with FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: redesignated the area to attainment/
the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory maintenance for CO (60 FR 39262). In
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 May 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM 12MYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_22177/page/1.svg)
![22088 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 91 / Friday, May 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
is published in the Federal Register. Procedures’’ and the entries ‘‘Sect For general information contact: The
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as .0601’’ through ‘‘Sect .0607’’. TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). [FR Doc. 2017–09539 Filed 5–11–17; 8:45 am] South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
petitions for judicial review of this 1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
action must be filed in the United States epa.gov.
Court of Appeals for the appropriate ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
circuit by July 11, 2017. Filing a petition AGENCY
I. What action is the Agency taking?
for reconsideration by the Administrator
40 CFR Part 704 EPA is extending the effective date for
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of [EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0572; FRL–9962–58] a final rule that appeared in the Federal
judicial review nor does it extend the Register of January 12, 2017 (82 FR
time within which a petition for judicial RIN 2070–AK39 3641; FRL–9957–81) from May 12, 2017
review may be filed, and shall not to August 14, 2017. That rule
postpone the effectiveness of such rule Chemical Substances When established final reporting and
or action. Parties with objections to this Manufactured or Processed as recordkeeping requirements for certain
direct final rule are encouraged to file a Nanoscale Materials; TSCA Reporting chemical substances when they are
comment in response to the parallel and Recordkeeping Requirements manufactured or processed at the
notice of proposed rulemaking for this AGENCY: Environmental Protection nanoscale as described in that rule.
action published in the proposed rules Agency (EPA). Specifically, the rule requires persons
section of today’s Federal Register, that manufacture (defined by statute to
ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective include import) or process, or intend to
rather than file an immediate petition date.
for judicial review of this direct final manufacture or process these chemical
rule, so that EPA can withdraw this SUMMARY: EPA is hereby extending the substances to electronically report to
direct final rule and address the effective date of the final rule that EPA certain information, which
comment in the proposed rulemaking. appeared in the Federal Register of includes insofar as known to or
This action may not be challenged later January 12, 2017, and established final reasonably ascertainable by the person
in proceedings to enforce its reporting and recordkeeping making the report, the specific chemical
requirements. See section 307(b)(2). requirements for certain chemical identity, production volume, methods of
substances when they are manufactured manufacture and processing, exposure
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 and release information, and existing
or processed at the nanoscale as
described in that rule. information concerning environmental
Environmental protection, Air
and health effects. The rule involves
pollution control, Carbon monoxide, DATES: The effective date of the final
one-time reporting for existing discrete
Incorporation by reference, rule that appeared in the Federal forms of certain nanoscale materials,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Register of January 12, 2017 (82 FR and a standing one-time reporting
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 3641), is delayed from May 12, 2017, to requirement for new discrete forms of
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping August 14, 2017. certain nanoscale materials before those
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, new forms are manufactured or
organic compounds. identified by docket identification (ID) processed.
Dated: March 31, 2017. number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0572, is Section 553(b)(1)(B) of the
V. Anne Heard, available electronically at http:// Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
www.regulations.gov or in person at the 553(b)(1)(B), allows an action to be
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
Office of Pollution Prevention and taken without opportunity for notice or
■ 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), comment when the agency for good
Environmental Protection Agency cause finds that notice and public
PART 52—APPROVAL AND Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William procedure thereon are impracticable,
PROMULGATION OF Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 unnecessary, or contrary to the public
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, interest. In addition, Section 553(d)(3),
DC. The Public Reading Room is open 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), allows the effective
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday date of an action to be less than 30 days
continues to read as follows: through Friday, excluding legal when a good cause finding is made.
holidays. The telephone number for the Because of the complex issues regarding
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, reporting requirements of the rule and
Subpart II—North Carolina and the telephone number for the OPPT the immediate pendency of the effective
Docket is (202) 566–0280. Please review date of the reporting requirements, it
§ 52.1770 [Amended] the visitor instructions and additional would be impractical to make the
information about the docket available effective date of this extension 30 days
■ 2. Section 52.1770(c), Table 1 is at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
amended: after its publication, and it would be
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For impractical to get public comments on
■ a. Under ‘‘Subchapter 2D Air technical information contact: Jim an extension of the effective date of the
Pollution Control Requirements’’ by
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Alwood, Chemical Control Division rule. In addition, the public interest is
removing the heading ‘‘Section .0800 (7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention served by complete and accurate
Complex Sources’’ and the entries ‘‘Sect and Toxics, Environmental Protection reporting under the rule, which would
.0801’’ through ‘‘Sect .0806’’; and Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., be greatly facilitated by publication of
■ b. Under ‘‘Subchapter 2Q Air Quality Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone the guidance. Therefore, EPA finds good
Permits’’ by removing the heading number: (202) 564–8974; email address: cause to extend the effective date of the
‘‘Section .0600 Transportation Facility alwood.jim@epa.gov. rule without notice and comment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 May 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM 12MYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_22177/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-05-12 01:09:22
Document Modified: 2017-05-12 01:09:22
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This direct final rule is effective July 11, 2017 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by June 12, 2017. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404) 562-9222. Ms. Sheckler can also be reached via electronic mail at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 22086 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR