82 FR 23064 - Certain Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest and Bonding

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 96 (May 19, 2017)

Page Range		23064-23066
FR Document		2017-10144

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part the final initial determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') on March 13, 2017 (served on March 14, 2017), finding a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, as to the pending patent claims in this investigation.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 96 (Friday, May 19, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 96 (Friday, May 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23064-23066]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10144]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-989]

Certain Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components
Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Commission
Determination To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a
Violation of Section 337; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on
the Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest and Bonding

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review in part the final initial
determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') on March 13, 2017 (served on March 14, 2017), finding a
violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, as to
the pending patent claims in this investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on

[[Page 23065]]

this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on March 14, 2016, based on a complaint filed by Nautilus Hyosung Inc.
of Seoul, Republic of Korea and Nautilus Hyosung America Inc. of
Irving, Texas (collectively, ``Nautilus''). 81 FR 13149 (Mar. 14,
2016). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United
States after importation of certain automated teller machines, ATM
modules, components thereof, and products containing the same by reason
of infringement of one or more of claims 1-3 and 5 of U.S. Patent No.
7,891,551 (``the '551 patent''); claims 1 and 6 of U.S. Patent No.
7,950,655 (``the '655 patent''); claims 1-4, 6, and 7 of U.S. Patent
No. 8,152,165 (``the '165 patent''); and claims 1-3, 6, 8, and 9 of
U.S. Patent No. 8,523,235 (``the '235 patent''). Id. The notice of
investigation named the following respondents: Diebold, Incorporated of
North Canton, Ohio and Diebold Self-Service Systems of North Canton,
Ohio (collectively, ``Diebold''). Id. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations is not a party to the investigation.
On June 30, 2016, the ALJ granted a motion by Nautilus to terminate
the investigation as to all asserted claims of the '551 patent and the
'165 patent. See Order No. 11 (June 30, 2016). The Commission
determined not to review the ID. See Notice of non-review (July 27,
2016).
On July 21, 2016, the ALJ granted a motion by Nautilus to terminate
the investigation as to all asserted claims of the '655 patent. See
Order No. 17 (July 21, 2016). The Commission determined not to review
the ID. See Notice of non-review (Aug. 16, 2016).
On March 13, 2017, the ALJ issued his final ID, finding a violation
of section 337 by Diebold in connection with claims 1-3, 6, 8, and 9 of
the '235 patent. Specifically, the ALJ found that the Commission has
subject matter jurisdiction, in rem jurisdiction over the accused
products, and in personam jurisdiction over Diebold. ID at 9, 104-107.
The ALJ also found that Nautilus satisfied the importation requirement
of section 337 (19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(1)(B)). Id. The ALJ further found
that Diebold's accused products directly infringe asserted claims 1-3,
6, 8, and 9 of the '235 patent, and that Diebold also contributorily
infringes those claims. See ID at 111-160, 163-172. The ALJ also found
that Diebold failed to establish that the asserted claims of the '235
are invalid for (1) indefiniteness (2) anticipation, or (3)
obviousness. ID at 232-311. Finally, the ALJ found that Nautilus
established the existence of a domestic industry that practices the
asserted patents under 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(2). See ID at 212.
The final ID contains the ALJ's recommended determination on remedy
and bonding. ID at 330-340. The ALJ recommends that in the event the
Commission finds a violation of section 337, the Commission should
issue a limited exclusion order prohibiting the importation of
Diebold's automated teller machines, ATM modules, components thereof,
and products containing the same that infringe the asserted claims of
the '235 patent. ID at 335. The ALJ also recommends issuance of cease
and desist orders based on the presence of Diebold's commercially
significant inventory in the United States. ID at 338. With respect to
the amount of bond that should be posted during the period of
Presidential review, the ALJ recommends that the Commission set a bond
in the amount of zero (i.e., no bond) during the period of Presidential
review because Nautilus ``did not attempt any type of price
comparison.'' ID at 341.
On March 27, 2017, Diebold filed a petition for review of the ID,
challenging a number of the ALJ's findings. See Respondents' Petition
for Review and Contingent Petition for Review. Specifically, Diebold
questions the ALJ's construction of certain claim limitations,
infringement findings, and the ALJ's finding that asserted claims are
not invalid. Id.
On April 4, 2017, Nautilus filed a response to Diebold's petition
for review. See Complainants' Response to Respondents' Petition for
Review.
Having examined the record of this investigation, including the
ALJ's final ID, the petition for review, and the response thereto, the
Commission has determined to review the final ID in part. Specifically,
the Commission has determined to review (1) the ALJ's finding that the
accused products and domestic industry products satisfy the claim
limitation ``a main transfer unit coupled to the bundle separator and
configured to horizontally transfer the individual sheets of the
banknotes along a main transfer path'' and (2) the ALJ's finding that
certain prior art does not disclose the preamble to claim 1:
``automatic depositing apparatus for automatically depositing a bundle
of banknotes including at least one cheque.''
In connection with its review, the Commission is interested in
responses to the following question:

1. Do the main transfer paths in the accused and domestic
industry products deviate sufficiently from horizontal such that
they do not fall within the claim limitation: ``a main transfer unit
coupled to the bundle separator and configured to horizontally
transfer the individual sheets of the banknotes along a main
transfer path''? Please consider the doctrine of equivalents in your
answer.

The parties are requested to brief only the discrete issue above,
with reference to the applicable law and evidentiary record. The
parties are not to brief other issues on review, which are adequately
presented in the parties' existing filings.
In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of
the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2)
issue one or more cease and desist orders that could result in the
respondent being required to cease and desist from engaging in unfair
acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, the
Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address
the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks
exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes
other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and
provide information establishing that activities involving other types
of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so. For
background, see Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via Telephone
Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994)
(Commission Opinion).
If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must
consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The
factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the
public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S.
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly
competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in
the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade
Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve
or disapprove the Commission's action. See Presidential Memorandum of
July

[[Page 23066]]

21, 2005. 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). During this period, the subject
articles would be entitled to enter the United States under bond, in an
amount determined by the Commission and prescribed by the Secretary of
the Treasury. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving
submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be imposed if
a remedy is ordered.
Written Submissions: The parties to the investigation are requested
to file written submissions on the issues identified in this notice.
Parties to the investigation, interested government agencies, and any
other interested parties are encouraged to file written submissions on
the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Such
submissions should address the recommended determination by the ALJ on
remedy and bonding. Complainants are requested to submit proposed
remedial orders for the Commission's consideration. Complainants are
also requested to state the date that the patent expires and the HTSUS
numbers under which the accused products are imported. Complainants are
further requested to supply the names of known importers of the
Nautilus products at issue in this investigation. The written
submissions and proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than
close of business on May 25, 2017. Reply submissions must be filed no
later than the close of business on June 1, 2017. Opening submissions
are limited to 50 pages. Reply submissions are limited to 25 pages.
Such submissions should address the ALJ's recommended determinations on
remedy and bonding. No further submissions on any of these issues will
be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit eight
true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day
pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the
investigation number (``Inv. No. 337-TA-989'') in a prominent place on
the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic
Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions
regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202-205-2000).
Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests
should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include
a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment
by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All
information, including confidential business information and documents
for which confidential treatment is properly sought, submitted to the
Commission for purposes of this Investigation may be disclosed to and
used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a
related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews,
and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of
the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
government employees and contract personnel,\1\ solely for
cybersecurity purposes. All nonconfidential written submissions will be
available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on
EDIS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure
agreements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).

By order of the Commission.

Issued: May 15, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-10144 Filed 5-18-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

23064 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 96 / Friday, May 19, 2017 / Notices

contain any new factual information) alleged to be sold in the United States completed and filed its determination in
pertinent to the review by June 29, 2017. at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’). this investigation on May 15, 2017. The
If comments contain business views of the Commission are contained
Commencement of Final Phase
proprietary information (BPI), they must in USITC Publication 4694 (May 2017),
Investigation
conform with the requirements of entitled Carton Closing Staples from
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Pursuant to section 207.18 of the China: Investigation No. 731–TA–1359
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Commission’s rules, the Commission (Preliminary).
rules with respect to filing were revised also gives notice of the commencement
Issued: May 15, 2017.
effective July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 of the final phase of its investigation.
The Commission will issue a final phase By order of the Commission.
(June 25, 2014), and the revised
notice of scheduling, which will be William R. Bishop,
Commission Handbook on E-filing,
available from the Commission’s Web published in the Federal Register as Supervisory Hearings and Information
provided in section 207.21 of the Officer.
site at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Commission’s rules, upon notice from [FR Doc. 2017–10142 Filed 5–18–17; 8:45 am]
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) the Department of Commerce BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
and 207.3 of the rules, each document (‘‘Commerce’’) of an affirmative
filed by a party to the review must be preliminary determination in the
served on all other parties to the review investigation under section 733(b) of the INTERNATIONAL TRADE
(as identified by either the public or BPI Act, or, if the preliminary determination COMMISSION
service list), and a certificate of service is negative, upon notice of an
must be timely filed. The Secretary will [Investigation No. 337–TA–989]
affirmative final determination in that
not accept a document for filing without investigation under section 735(a) of the Certain Automated Teller Machines,
a certificate of service. Act. Parties that filed entries of ATM Modules, Components Thereof,
Determination.—The Commission has appearance in the preliminary phase of and Products Containing the Same;
determined these reviews are the investigation need not enter a Notice of Commission Determination
extraordinarily complicated and separate appearance for the final phase To Review in Part a Final Initial
therefore has determined to exercise its of the investigation. Industrial users, Determination Finding a Violation of
authority to extend the review period by and, if the merchandise under Section 337; Schedule for Filing
up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. investigation is sold at the retail level, Written Submissions on the Issues
1675(c)(5)(B). representative consumer organizations Under Review and on Remedy, the
Authority: This review is being conducted have the right to appear as parties in Public Interest and Bonding
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act Commission antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations. The AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Secretary will prepare a public service Commission.
list containing the names and addresses ACTION: Notice.
By order of the Commission.
of all persons, or their representatives,
Issued: May 15, 2017. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
who are parties to the investigation.
William R. Bishop, the U.S. International Trade
Supervisory Hearings and Information Background Commission has determined to review
Officer. On March 31, 2017, North American in part the final initial determination
[FR Doc. 2017–10143 Filed 5–18–17; 8:45 am] Steel & Wire/ISM Enterprises (‘‘ISM’’), (‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Butler, Pennsylvania filed petitions with administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on
the Commission and Commerce, March 13, 2017 (served on March 14,
alleging that an industry in the United 2017), finding a violation of section 337
INTERNATIONAL TRADE States is materially injured by reason of of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
COMMISSION LTFV imports of carton closing staples as to the pending patent claims in this
from China. Accordingly, effective investigation.
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1359 March 31, 2017, the Commission, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(Preliminary)] pursuant to section 733(a) of the Act (19 Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General
U.S.C. 1673b(a)), instituted antidumping Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Carton Closing Staples From China duty investigation No. 731–TA–1359 Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
(Preliminary). Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
Determination 205–3042. Copies of non-confidential
Notice of the institution of the
On the basis of the record 1 developed Commission’s investigation and of a documents filed in connection with this
in the subject investigation, the United public conference to be held in investigation are or will be available for
States International Trade Commission connection therewith was given by inspection during official business
(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant posting copies of the notice in the Office hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), of the Secretary, U.S. International Office of the Secretary, U.S.
that there is a reasonable indication that Trade Commission, Washington, DC, International Trade Commission, 500 E
an industry in the United States is and by publishing the notice in the Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
Federal Register of April 7, 2017 (82 FR telephone 202–205–2000. General
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

materially injured by reason of imports
of carton closing staples from China, 17036). The conference was held in information concerning the Commission
provided for in subheadings 8305.20 Washington, DC, on April 20, 2017, and may also be obtained by accessing its
and 7317.00 of the Harmonized Tariff all persons who requested the Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
Schedule of the United States, that are opportunity were permitted to appear in The public record for this investigation
person or by counsel. may be viewed on the Commission’s
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the The Commission made this electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 determination pursuant to section edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
CFR 207.2(f)). 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(a)). It persons are advised that information on

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:15 May 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM 19MYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 96 / Friday, May 19, 2017 / Notices 23065

this matter can be obtained by See ID at 111–160, 163–172. The ALJ In connection with its review, the
contacting the Commission’s TDD also found that Diebold failed to Commission is interested in responses
terminal on 202–205–1810. establish that the asserted claims of the to the following question:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ’235 are invalid for (1) indefiniteness (2) 1. Do the main transfer paths in the
Commission instituted this investigation anticipation, or (3) obviousness. ID at accused and domestic industry products
on March 14, 2016, based on a 232–311. Finally, the ALJ found that deviate sufficiently from horizontal such that
complaint filed by Nautilus Hyosung Nautilus established the existence of a they do not fall within the claim limitation:
domestic industry that practices the ‘‘a main transfer unit coupled to the bundle
Inc. of Seoul, Republic of Korea and
asserted patents under 19 U.S.C. separator and configured to horizontally
Nautilus Hyosung America Inc. of transfer the individual sheets of the
Irving, Texas (collectively, ‘‘Nautilus’’). 1337(a)(2). See ID at 212.
banknotes along a main transfer path’’?
81 FR 13149 (Mar. 14, 2016). The The final ID contains the ALJ’s
Please consider the doctrine of equivalents in
complaint alleges violations of section recommended determination on remedy your answer.
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as and bonding. ID at 330–340. The ALJ
recommends that in the event the The parties are requested to brief only
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the the discrete issue above, with reference
importation into the United States, the Commission finds a violation of section
337, the Commission should issue a to the applicable law and evidentiary
sale for importation, and the sale within record. The parties are not to brief other
the United States after importation of limited exclusion order prohibiting the
importation of Diebold’s automated issues on review, which are adequately
certain automated teller machines, ATM presented in the parties’ existing filings.
teller machines, ATM modules,
modules, components thereof, and In connection with the final
components thereof, and products
products containing the same by reason disposition of this investigation, the
containing the same that infringe the
of infringement of one or more of claims Commission may (1) issue an order that
asserted claims of the ’235 patent. ID at
1–3 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 7,891,551 could result in the exclusion of the
335. The ALJ also recommends issuance
(‘‘the ’551 patent’’); claims 1 and 6 of subject articles from entry into the
of cease and desist orders based on the
U.S. Patent No. 7,950,655 (‘‘the ’655 United States, and/or (2) issue one or
presence of Diebold’s commercially
patent’’); claims 1–4, 6, and 7 of U.S. more cease and desist orders that could
significant inventory in the United
Patent No. 8,152,165 (‘‘the ’165 patent’’); result in the respondent being required
States. ID at 338. With respect to the
and claims 1–3, 6, 8, and 9 of U.S. to cease and desist from engaging in
amount of bond that should be posted
Patent No. 8,523,235 (‘‘the ’235 patent’’). during the period of Presidential review, unfair acts in the importation and sale
Id. The notice of investigation named the ALJ recommends that the of such articles. Accordingly, the
the following respondents: Diebold, Commission set a bond in the amount Commission is interested in receiving
Incorporated of North Canton, Ohio and of zero (i.e., no bond) during the period written submissions that address the
Diebold Self-Service Systems of North of Presidential review because Nautilus form of remedy, if any, that should be
Canton, Ohio (collectively, ‘‘Diebold’’). ‘‘did not attempt any type of price ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an
Id. The Office of Unfair Import comparison.’’ ID at 341. article from entry into the United States
Investigations is not a party to the On March 27, 2017, Diebold filed a for purposes other than entry for
investigation. petition for review of the ID, challenging consumption, the party should so
On June 30, 2016, the ALJ granted a a number of the ALJ’s findings. See indicate and provide information
motion by Nautilus to terminate the Respondents’ Petition for Review and establishing that activities involving
investigation as to all asserted claims of Contingent Petition for Review. other types of entry either are adversely
the ’551 patent and the ’165 patent. See Specifically, Diebold questions the affecting it or likely to do so. For
Order No. 11 (June 30, 2016). The ALJ’s construction of certain claim background, see Certain Devices for
Commission determined not to review limitations, infringement findings, and Connecting Computers via Telephone
the ID. See Notice of non-review (July the ALJ’s finding that asserted claims Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC
27, 2016). are not invalid. Id. Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994)
On July 21, 2016, the ALJ granted a On April 4, 2017, Nautilus filed a (Commission Opinion).
motion by Nautilus to terminate the response to Diebold’s petition for If the Commission contemplates some
investigation as to all asserted claims of review. See Complainants’ Response to form of remedy, it must consider the
the ’655 patent. See Order No. 17 (July Respondents’ Petition for Review. effects of that remedy upon the public
21, 2016). The Commission determined Having examined the record of this interest. The factors the Commission
not to review the ID. See Notice of non- investigation, including the ALJ’s final will consider include the effect that an
review (Aug. 16, 2016). ID, the petition for review, and the exclusion order and/or cease and desist
On March 13, 2017, the ALJ issued his response thereto, the Commission has orders would have on (1) the public
final ID, finding a violation of section determined to review the final ID in health and welfare, (2) competitive
337 by Diebold in connection with part. Specifically, the Commission has conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S.
claims 1–3, 6, 8, and 9 of the ’235 determined to review (1) the ALJ’s production of articles that are like or
patent. Specifically, the ALJ found that finding that the accused products and directly competitive with those that are
the Commission has subject matter domestic industry products satisfy the subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
jurisdiction, in rem jurisdiction over the claim limitation ‘‘a main transfer unit consumers. The Commission is
accused products, and in personam coupled to the bundle separator and therefore interested in receiving written
jurisdiction over Diebold. ID at 9, 104– configured to horizontally transfer the submissions that address the
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

107. The ALJ also found that Nautilus individual sheets of the banknotes along aforementioned public interest factors
satisfied the importation requirement of a main transfer path’’ and (2) the ALJ’s in the context of this investigation.
section 337 (19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(1)(B)). Id. finding that certain prior art does not If the Commission orders some form
The ALJ further found that Diebold’s disclose the preamble to claim 1: of remedy, the U.S. Trade
accused products directly infringe ‘‘automatic depositing apparatus for Representative, as delegated by the
asserted claims 1–3, 6, 8, and 9 of the automatically depositing a bundle of President, has 60 days to approve or
’235 patent, and that Diebold also banknotes including at least one disapprove the Commission’s action.
contributorily infringes those claims. cheque.’’ See Presidential Memorandum of July

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:15 May 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM 19MYN1

Document Created: 2018-11-08 08:47:56
Document Modified: 2018-11-08 08:47:56

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice.
Contact		Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3042. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810.
FR Citation		82 FR 23064