82_FR_24012 82 FR 23913 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Establish Fees for Government Securities Division CCIT Members, and Netting Members That Engage in CCIT Transactions

82 FR 23913 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Establish Fees for Government Securities Division CCIT Members, and Netting Members That Engage in CCIT Transactions

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 99 (May 24, 2017)

Page Range23913-23915
FR Document2017-10585

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 99 (Wednesday, May 24, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23913-23915]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10585]



[[Page 23913]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-80717; File No. SR-FICC-2017-013]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change 
To Establish Fees for Government Securities Division CCIT Members, and 
Netting Members That Engage in CCIT Transactions

May 18, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on May 16, 2017, Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which 
Items have been prepared by the clearing agency. FICC filed the 
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and 
Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this 
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the 
Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change consists of modifications to the Fee 
Structure in the Government Securities Division (``GSD'') Rulebook 
(``GSD Rules'') \5\ in order to establish fees for (i) CCIT Members, 
including those that participate through a Joint Account, and (ii) 
Netting Members that engage in CCIT Transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined 
shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the GSD Rules, 
available at www.dtcc.com/~/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rules/
ficc_gov_rules.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the clearing agency included 
statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule 
change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule 
change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places 
specified in Item IV below. The clearing agency has prepared summaries, 
set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant 
aspects of such statements.

(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    FICC has established the CCITTM Service, which enables 
Netting Members that participate in the GCF Repo Service to engage in 
CCIT Transactions with CCIT Members and submit those transactions to 
FICC for clearing.\6\ Accordingly, FICC is proposing rule changes to 
amend the Fee Structure in the GSD Rules in order to establish fees for 
(1) CCIT Members, including those that participate through a Joint 
Account,\7\ and (2) Netting Members that engage in CCIT Transactions, 
as further described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80574 (May 2, 
2017), 82 FR 21439 (May 8, 2017) (SR-FICC-2017-005) and 80546 (April 
27, 2017), 82 FR 20652 (May 3, 2017) (SR-FICC-2017-803).
    \7\ With respect to CCIT Members participating through a Joint 
Account, the proposed fees that are the subject of this filing would 
be applied at the Joint Account level.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section I.D (Trade Comparison Fees, Modifications and Cancellations)
    Section I.D of the Fee Structure (Trade Comparison Fees, 
Modifications and Cancellations) would be amended to exclude CCIT 
Transactions from the 25 cents per request charge for modification or 
cancellation of either side of a trade or Repo Transaction, consistent 
with the treatment of GCF Repo Transactions. This section also would be 
amended to provide that the charge to a Member for the entry of a 
request by such Member to modify or cancel a side of a CCIT Transaction 
would be 5 cents per 50 million of par value, consistent with the 
treatment of GCF Repo Transactions.
Section I.E (Trade Comparison Fees, Locked-In Trade Data)
    Section I.E of the Fee Structure (Trade Comparison Fees, Locked-In 
Trade Data) would be amended to provide that the ``Trade Submission'' 
fee associated with the submission of trade data to FICC on a Locked-In 
Trade basis would not apply to CCIT Transactions, consistent with the 
treatment of GCF Repo Transactions. This section also would be amended 
to provide that, consistent with the treatment of GCF Repo 
Transactions, non-Inter-Dealer Broker Members would be subject to a 
onetime recording fee for the processing and reporting by FICC of a 
CCIT Transaction submitted to FICC on a Locked-In Trade basis in the 
amount of 7 cents per million gross dollar amount of such CCIT 
Transaction (with a minimum charge of $2.50).
Section I.F (Trade Comparison Fees, CCIT Transactions Submitted for 
Bilateral Comparison)
    A new Section I.F of the Fee Structure (Trade Comparison Fees, CCIT 
Transactions Submitted for Bilateral Comparison) would be added by this 
filing to provide that, consistent with the treatment of GCF Repo 
Transactions and CCIT Transactions submitted to FICC on a Locked-In 
Trade basis, CCIT Members and Netting Members would be subject to a 
onetime recording fee for the processing and reporting by FICC of a 
CCIT Transaction submitted to FICC on a bilateral basis in the amount 
of 7 cents per million gross dollar amount of such CCIT Transaction 
(with a minimum charge of $2.50).
Section III.A.1 (Netting Fee and Charges, Netting Fee)
    Section III.A.1 of the Fee Structure (Netting Fee and Charges, 
Netting Fee) would be amended to provide that the fees applied to 
netted Compared Trades, Start Legs of Repo Transactions, Close Legs of 
Repo Transactions, Fail Deliver Obligations and Fail Receive 
Obligations on a per side and par value basis would not apply to CCIT 
Transactions, consistent with the treatment of GCF Repo Transactions.
Section III.D.4 (Netting Fee and Charges, Clearance Charges)
    Section III.D.4 of the Fee Structure (Netting Fee and Charges, 
Clearance Charges) describes clearing bank fees and charges incurred by 
FICC for the services FICC performs in connection with Netting Members' 
activity. Subsection (c) of this Section III.D.4, which describes The 
Bank of New York Mellon (``BNY'') fee on each GCF Repo Deliver 
Obligation that FICC creates from its BNY account, would be amended to 
provide that, when this BNY fee is assessed on FICC's GCF Repo Deliver 
Obligations at BNY that are created versus CCIT Members at BNY, the fee 
would be calculated as 1 basis point per annum on a dollar amount of 
the underlying CCIT Transactions, and the fee would be passed through 
to the Dealer Account at BNY of the Netting Member that is the Repo 
Party to such CCIT Transactions. In addition, in order to distinguish 
it from the treatment of CCIT Transactions, FICC is proposing to amend 
this section to state that the fees assessed on FICC's GCF Repo Deliver 
Obligations that are created versus Netting Members would be allocated 
to

[[Page 23914]]

Dealer Accounts at BNY and to Dealer Accounts at J.P. Morgan Chase 
(``JPM'').
Section III.E (Netting Fee and Charges, Repo Transaction Processing 
Fee)
    Section III.E of the Fee Structure (Netting Fee and Charges, Repo 
Transaction Processing Fee) would be amended to exclude CCIT 
Transactions from the fee imposed on term Repo Transactions that have 
been compared and netted, but which have not yet settled, consistent 
with the treatment of GCF Repo Transactions. This section also would be 
amended to provide that, consistent with the treatment of a GCF Repo 
Transaction, for a CCIT Transaction that has been compared and netted, 
but which has not yet settled, a processing fee would be calculated as 
follows:
    (1) For all Netting Members and CCIT Members, a 0.04 basis point 
charge (i.e., four hundredths of a basis point) would be applied to the 
gross dollar amount of such CCIT Transaction; and
    (2) a 0.08 basis point charge (i.e., 8 hundredths of a basis point) 
would be applied to the net dollar amount of a Netting Member's or CCIT 
Member's Collateral Allocation Entitlements and Collateral Allocation 
Obligations.
    These fees would be applied each calendar day, but calculated on an 
annualized basis, as currently provided in this section.
Section III.G (Netting Fee and Charges, Repo Collateral Substitution 
Fees)
    Section III.G of the Fee Structure (Netting Fee and Charges, Repo 
Collateral Substitution Fees) would be amended to exclude CCIT 
Transactions from the processing charge associated with repo collateral 
substitution requests. To be consistent with the treatment of GCF Repo 
Transactions, FICC is amending this section to state that GCF Repo 
Transactions would also be excluded from the processing charge 
associated with repo collateral substitution requests.
Section IV (Minimum Monthly Fee) and Section V (Fees Applicable to 
Additional Accounts)
    Under Sections IV and V of the Fee Structure (Minimum Monthly Fee 
and Fees Applicable to Additional Accounts), CCIT Members would be 
excluded from the minimum monthly account fees charged to Comparison-
Only Members and Netting Members for their primary GSD accounts and 
fees for any additional accounts they maintain with GSD.
Section VIII (Definition)
    Section VIII of the Fee Structure (Definition) would be amended to 
exclude CCIT Transactions from the requirement that, for purposes of 
the Fee Structure, a ``side'' of a trade or transaction, and a Start 
Leg or a Close Leg of a Repo Transaction, be limited to $50 million 
increments, consistent with the treatment of GCF Repo Transactions.
Member Impact
    Participation in the CCIT Service is voluntary. Institutional cash 
lenders that wish to become CCIT Members, and Netting Members that wish 
to participate in the CCIT Service, have an opportunity to review the 
terms of the CCIT Service and determine if they would like to 
participate. Choosing to participate in the CCIT Service would subject 
these entities to all of the rules applicable to the CCIT Service, 
including the fees reflected in GSD's Fee Structure as proposed by this 
filing.
2. Statutory Basis
    Section 17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act requires that the GSD Rules 
``provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and 
other charges among its participants.'' \8\ FICC believes the proposed 
fees are equitably allocated among GSD Members because these fees would 
only be imposed upon those GSD Members that chose to utilize the CCIT 
Service. FICC also believes the proposed fees are reasonable because 
these fees would allow FICC to recover the costs (including pass-
through costs from certain third parties) of providing the CCIT Service 
from those GSD Members that enjoy its benefits. Therefore, FICC 
believes the proposed fees are consistent with the requirements of 
Section 17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FICC believes the proposed fees may impose a burden on competition 
by limiting participation in the CCIT Service to institutional cash 
lenders and Netting Members that are willing to pay the fees associated 
with their participation in the CCIT Service. However, FICC believes 
any burden on competition that may result from the proposed fees would 
be necessary and appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, 
as permitted by Section 17A(b)(3)(I) of the Act,\9\ for the reason 
described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(I).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although the proposal would impose fees on CCIT Members and Netting 
Members for their use of the CCIT Service, FICC believes that any 
burden on competition that may result from the proposal would be 
necessary and appropriate because the proposed fees would provide FICC 
with the ability to achieve and maintain its operating margin, recover 
the cost of providing the CCIT Service and also pass through certain 
third-party fees that FICC would incur in connection with the CCIT 
Service. Moreover, as described in Section II.(A)1. above, 
participation in the CCIT Service is entirely voluntary, and, if 
Netting Members and their institutional counterparties do not wish to 
pay the fees associated with the service, they would be able to enter 
into non-cleared tri-party repo transactions in GCF Repo eligible asset 
classes outside of GSD.

(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change 
Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been 
solicited or received. FICC will notify the Commission of any written 
comments received by FICC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change, and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 
thereunder.\11\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the 
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend 
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is 
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of 
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-FICC-2017-013 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange

[[Page 23915]]

Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FICC-2017-013. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of FICC and on 
DTCC's Web site (http://dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings.aspx). All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-FICC-2017-013 and should be 
submitted on or before June 14, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-10585 Filed 5-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P



                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 24, 2017 / Notices                                            23913

                                                    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                 and C below, of the most significant                  million gross dollar amount of such
                                                    COMMISSION                                              aspects of such statements.                           CCIT Transaction (with a minimum
                                                                                                                                                                  charge of $2.50).
                                                                                                            (A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
                                                    [Release No. 34–80717; File No. SR–FICC–                Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the              Section I.F (Trade Comparison Fees,
                                                    2017–013]
                                                                                                            Proposed Rule Change                                  CCIT Transactions Submitted for
                                                    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed                    1. Purpose                                            Bilateral Comparison)
                                                    Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of                     FICC has established the CCITTM                       A new Section I.F of the Fee Structure
                                                    Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of                   Service, which enables Netting                        (Trade Comparison Fees, CCIT
                                                    a Proposed Rule Change To Establish                     Members that participate in the GCF                   Transactions Submitted for Bilateral
                                                    Fees for Government Securities                          Repo Service to engage in CCIT                        Comparison) would be added by this
                                                    Division CCIT Members, and Netting                      Transactions with CCIT Members and                    filing to provide that, consistent with
                                                    Members That Engage in CCIT                             submit those transactions to FICC for                 the treatment of GCF Repo Transactions
                                                    Transactions                                            clearing.6 Accordingly, FICC is                       and CCIT Transactions submitted to
                                                    May 18, 2017.                                           proposing rule changes to amend the                   FICC on a Locked-In Trade basis, CCIT
                                                       Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the                  Fee Structure in the GSD Rules in order               Members and Netting Members would
                                                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934                         to establish fees for (1) CCIT Members,               be subject to a onetime recording fee for
                                                    (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2                 including those that participate through              the processing and reporting by FICC of
                                                    notice is hereby given that on May 16,                  a Joint Account,7 and (2) Netting                     a CCIT Transaction submitted to FICC
                                                    2017, Fixed Income Clearing                             Members that engage in CCIT                           on a bilateral basis in the amount of 7
                                                    Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed with the                   Transactions, as further described                    cents per million gross dollar amount of
                                                    Securities and Exchange Commission                      below.                                                such CCIT Transaction (with a
                                                    (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule                                                                            minimum charge of $2.50).
                                                                                                            Section I.D (Trade Comparison Fees,
                                                    change as described in Items I, II and III              Modifications and Cancellations)                      Section III.A.1 (Netting Fee and Charges,
                                                    below, which Items have been prepared                     Section I.D of the Fee Structure (Trade             Netting Fee)
                                                    by the clearing agency. FICC filed the                  Comparison Fees, Modifications and
                                                    proposed rule change pursuant to                                                                                 Section III.A.1 of the Fee Structure
                                                                                                            Cancellations) would be amended to                    (Netting Fee and Charges, Netting Fee)
                                                    Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule               exclude CCIT Transactions from the 25
                                                    19b–4(f)(2) thereunder.4 The                                                                                  would be amended to provide that the
                                                                                                            cents per request charge for                          fees applied to netted Compared Trades,
                                                    Commission is publishing this notice to                 modification or cancellation of either
                                                    solicit comments on the proposed rule                                                                         Start Legs of Repo Transactions, Close
                                                                                                            side of a trade or Repo Transaction,                  Legs of Repo Transactions, Fail Deliver
                                                    change from interested persons.                         consistent with the treatment of GCF                  Obligations and Fail Receive
                                                    I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the                   Repo Transactions. This section also                  Obligations on a per side and par value
                                                    Terms of Substance of the Proposed                      would be amended to provide that the                  basis would not apply to CCIT
                                                    Rule Change                                             charge to a Member for the entry of a                 Transactions, consistent with the
                                                                                                            request by such Member to modify or                   treatment of GCF Repo Transactions.
                                                       The proposed rule change consists of                 cancel a side of a CCIT Transaction
                                                    modifications to the Fee Structure in the               would be 5 cents per 50 million of par                Section III.D.4 (Netting Fee and Charges,
                                                    Government Securities Division                          value, consistent with the treatment of               Clearance Charges)
                                                    (‘‘GSD’’) Rulebook (‘‘GSD Rules’’) 5 in                 GCF Repo Transactions.
                                                    order to establish fees for (i) CCIT                                                                             Section III.D.4 of the Fee Structure
                                                    Members, including those that                           Section I.E (Trade Comparison Fees,                   (Netting Fee and Charges, Clearance
                                                    participate through a Joint Account, and                Locked-In Trade Data)                                 Charges) describes clearing bank fees
                                                    (ii) Netting Members that engage in                        Section I.E of the Fee Structure (Trade            and charges incurred by FICC for the
                                                    CCIT Transactions.                                      Comparison Fees, Locked-In Trade Data)                services FICC performs in connection
                                                                                                            would be amended to provide that the                  with Netting Members’ activity.
                                                    II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the                                                                        Subsection (c) of this Section III.D.4,
                                                    Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the                ‘‘Trade Submission’’ fee associated with
                                                                                                            the submission of trade data to FICC on               which describes The Bank of New York
                                                    Proposed Rule Change                                                                                          Mellon (‘‘BNY’’) fee on each GCF Repo
                                                                                                            a Locked-In Trade basis would not
                                                      In its filing with the Commission, the                apply to CCIT Transactions, consistent                Deliver Obligation that FICC creates
                                                    clearing agency included statements                     with the treatment of GCF Repo                        from its BNY account, would be
                                                    concerning the purpose of and basis for                 Transactions. This section also would                 amended to provide that, when this
                                                    the proposed rule change and discussed                  be amended to provide that, consistent                BNY fee is assessed on FICC’s GCF Repo
                                                    any comments it received on the                         with the treatment of GCF Repo                        Deliver Obligations at BNY that are
                                                    proposed rule change. The text of these                 Transactions, non-Inter-Dealer Broker                 created versus CCIT Members at BNY,
                                                    statements may be examined at the                       Members would be subject to a onetime                 the fee would be calculated as 1 basis
                                                    places specified in Item IV below. The                  recording fee for the processing and                  point per annum on a dollar amount of
                                                    clearing agency has prepared                            reporting by FICC of a CCIT Transaction               the underlying CCIT Transactions, and
                                                    summaries, set forth in sections A, B,                  submitted to FICC on a Locked-In Trade                the fee would be passed through to the
                                                                                                                                                                  Dealer Account at BNY of the Netting
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                            basis in the amount of 7 cents per
                                                      1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                                                                                      Member that is the Repo Party to such
                                                      2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                     6 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80574    CCIT Transactions. In addition, in order
                                                      3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
                                                                                                            (May 2, 2017), 82 FR 21439 (May 8, 2017) (SR–         to distinguish it from the treatment of
                                                      4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).                             FICC–2017–005) and 80546 (April 27, 2017), 82 FR      CCIT Transactions, FICC is proposing to
                                                      5 Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise     20652 (May 3, 2017) (SR–FICC–2017–803).               amend this section to state that the fees
                                                    defined shall have the meaning assigned to such           7 With respect to CCIT Members participating

                                                    terms in the GSD Rules, available at www.dtcc.com/      through a Joint Account, the proposed fees that are
                                                                                                                                                                  assessed on FICC’s GCF Repo Deliver
                                                    ∼/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rules/ficc_gov_           the subject of this filing would be applied at the    Obligations that are created versus
                                                    rules.pdf.                                              Joint Account level.                                  Netting Members would be allocated to


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:43 May 23, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00142   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM   24MYN1


                                                    23914                        Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 24, 2017 / Notices

                                                    Dealer Accounts at BNY and to Dealer                    Section VIII (Definition)                              Service, FICC believes that any burden
                                                    Accounts at J.P. Morgan Chase (‘‘JPM’’).                   Section VIII of the Fee Structure                   on competition that may result from the
                                                                                                            (Definition) would be amended to                       proposal would be necessary and
                                                    Section III.E (Netting Fee and Charges,                                                                        appropriate because the proposed fees
                                                    Repo Transaction Processing Fee)                        exclude CCIT Transactions from the
                                                                                                            requirement that, for purposes of the Fee              would provide FICC with the ability to
                                                       Section III.E of the Fee Structure                   Structure, a ‘‘side’’ of a trade or                    achieve and maintain its operating
                                                    (Netting Fee and Charges, Repo                          transaction, and a Start Leg or a Close                margin, recover the cost of providing the
                                                    Transaction Processing Fee) would be                    Leg of a Repo Transaction, be limited to               CCIT Service and also pass through
                                                    amended to exclude CCIT Transactions                    $50 million increments, consistent with                certain third-party fees that FICC would
                                                    from the fee imposed on term Repo                       the treatment of GCF Repo Transactions.                incur in connection with the CCIT
                                                                                                                                                                   Service. Moreover, as described in
                                                    Transactions that have been compared                    Member Impact                                          Section II.(A)1. above, participation in
                                                    and netted, but which have not yet
                                                                                                              Participation in the CCIT Service is                 the CCIT Service is entirely voluntary,
                                                    settled, consistent with the treatment of
                                                                                                            voluntary. Institutional cash lenders                  and, if Netting Members and their
                                                    GCF Repo Transactions. This section
                                                                                                            that wish to become CCIT Members, and                  institutional counterparties do not wish
                                                    also would be amended to provide that,                                                                         to pay the fees associated with the
                                                    consistent with the treatment of a GCF                  Netting Members that wish to
                                                                                                            participate in the CCIT Service, have an               service, they would be able to enter into
                                                    Repo Transaction, for a CCIT                                                                                   non-cleared tri-party repo transactions
                                                                                                            opportunity to review the terms of the
                                                    Transaction that has been compared and                                                                         in GCF Repo eligible asset classes
                                                                                                            CCIT Service and determine if they
                                                    netted, but which has not yet settled, a                                                                       outside of GSD.
                                                                                                            would like to participate. Choosing to
                                                    processing fee would be calculated as
                                                                                                            participate in the CCIT Service would                  (C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
                                                    follows:
                                                                                                            subject these entities to all of the rules             Comments on the Proposed Rule
                                                       (1) For all Netting Members and CCIT                 applicable to the CCIT Service,                        Change Received From Members,
                                                    Members, a 0.04 basis point charge (i.e.,               including the fees reflected in GSD’s Fee              Participants, or Others
                                                    four hundredths of a basis point) would                 Structure as proposed by this filing.
                                                    be applied to the gross dollar amount of                                                                         Written comments relating to the
                                                    such CCIT Transaction; and                              2. Statutory Basis                                     proposed rule change have not been
                                                                                                               Section 17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act                     solicited or received. FICC will notify
                                                       (2) a 0.08 basis point charge (i.e., 8                                                                      the Commission of any written
                                                                                                            requires that the GSD Rules ‘‘provide for
                                                    hundredths of a basis point) would be                                                                          comments received by FICC.
                                                                                                            the equitable allocation of reasonable
                                                    applied to the net dollar amount of a
                                                                                                            dues, fees, and other charges among its                III. Date of Effectiveness of the
                                                    Netting Member’s or CCIT Member’s
                                                                                                            participants.’’ 8 FICC believes the                    Proposed Rule Change, and Timing for
                                                    Collateral Allocation Entitlements and
                                                                                                            proposed fees are equitably allocated                  Commission Action
                                                    Collateral Allocation Obligations.
                                                                                                            among GSD Members because these fees
                                                       These fees would be applied each                     would only be imposed upon those GSD                      The foregoing rule change has become
                                                    calendar day, but calculated on an                      Members that chose to utilize the CCIT                 effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
                                                    annualized basis, as currently provided                 Service. FICC also believes the proposed               of the Act 10 and paragraph (f) of Rule
                                                    in this section.                                        fees are reasonable because these fees                 19b–4 thereunder.11 At any time within
                                                                                                            would allow FICC to recover the costs                  60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
                                                    Section III.G (Netting Fee and Charges,                                                                        change, the Commission summarily may
                                                                                                            (including pass-through costs from
                                                    Repo Collateral Substitution Fees)                                                                             temporarily suspend such rule change if
                                                                                                            certain third parties) of providing the
                                                                                                            CCIT Service from those GSD Members                    it appears to the Commission that such
                                                       Section III.G of the Fee Structure                                                                          action is necessary or appropriate in the
                                                    (Netting Fee and Charges, Repo                          that enjoy its benefits. Therefore, FICC
                                                                                                            believes the proposed fees are consistent              public interest, for the protection of
                                                    Collateral Substitution Fees) would be                                                                         investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
                                                    amended to exclude CCIT Transactions                    with the requirements of Section
                                                                                                            17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act.                               the purposes of the Act.
                                                    from the processing charge associated
                                                    with repo collateral substitution                       (B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on                     IV. Solicitation of Comments
                                                    requests. To be consistent with the                     Burden on Competition                                    Interested persons are invited to
                                                    treatment of GCF Repo Transactions,                                                                            submit written data, views and
                                                                                                              FICC believes the proposed fees may
                                                    FICC is amending this section to state                                                                         arguments concerning the foregoing,
                                                                                                            impose a burden on competition by
                                                    that GCF Repo Transactions would also                                                                          including whether the proposed rule
                                                                                                            limiting participation in the CCIT
                                                    be excluded from the processing charge                                                                         change is consistent with the Act.
                                                                                                            Service to institutional cash lenders and
                                                    associated with repo collateral                                                                                Comments may be submitted by any of
                                                                                                            Netting Members that are willing to pay
                                                    substitution requests.                                                                                         the following methods:
                                                                                                            the fees associated with their
                                                    Section IV (Minimum Monthly Fee) and                    participation in the CCIT Service.                     Electronic Comments
                                                    Section V (Fees Applicable to                           However, FICC believes any burden on                     • Use the Commission’s Internet
                                                    Additional Accounts)                                    competition that may result from the                   comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
                                                                                                            proposed fees would be necessary and                   rules/sro.shtml); or
                                                      Under Sections IV and V of the Fee                    appropriate in furtherance of the                        • Send an email to rule-comments@
                                                    Structure (Minimum Monthly Fee and
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                            purposes of the Act, as permitted by                   sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
                                                    Fees Applicable to Additional                           Section 17A(b)(3)(I) of the Act,9 for the              FICC–2017–013 on the subject line.
                                                    Accounts), CCIT Members would be                        reason described below.
                                                    excluded from the minimum monthly                         Although the proposal would impose                   Paper Comments
                                                    account fees charged to Comparison-                     fees on CCIT Members and Netting                         • Send paper comments in triplicate
                                                    Only Members and Netting Members for                    Members for their use of the CCIT                      to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
                                                    their primary GSD accounts and fees for
                                                    any additional accounts they maintain                    8 15   U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(D).                           10 15   U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
                                                    with GSD.                                                9 15   U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(I).                           11 17   CFR 240.19b–4(f).



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:43 May 23, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00143    Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM     24MYN1


                                                                                     Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 24, 2017 / Notices                                                      23915

                                                    Commission, 100 F Street NE.,                             or ‘‘Exchange Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4                  Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
                                                    Washington, DC 20549.                                     thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that               (‘‘FINRA’’), Investors’ Exchange LLC,
                                                    All submissions should refer to File                      on May 12, 2017, Nasdaq MRX, LLC                       Miami International Securities
                                                    Number SR–FICC–2017–013. This file                        (‘‘MRX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the               Exchange, LLC, MIAX PEARL, LLC,
                                                    number should be included on the                          Securities and Exchange Commission                     NASDAQ BX, Inc., Nasdaq GEMX, LLC,
                                                    subject line if email is used. To help the                (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed               Nasdaq ISE, LLC, Nasdaq MRX, LLC,4
                                                    Commission process and review your                        rule change as described in Items I, II,               NASDAQ PHLX LLC, The NASDAQ
                                                    comments more efficiently, please use                     and III below, which Items have been                   Stock Market LLC, New York Stock
                                                    only one method. The Commission will                      prepared by the Exchange.3 The                         Exchange LLC, NYSE MKT LLC, NYSE
                                                    post all comments on the Commission’s                     Commission is publishing this notice to                Arca, Inc. and NYSE National, Inc.5
                                                    Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/                    solicit comments on the proposed rule                  (collectively, the ‘‘Participants’’) filed
                                                    rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the                           change from interested persons.                        with the Commission, pursuant to
                                                    submission, all subsequent                                                                                       Section 11A of the Exchange Act 6 and
                                                                                                              I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                    amendments, all written statements                                                                               Rule 608 of Regulation NMS
                                                                                                              Statement of the Terms of Substance of
                                                    with respect to the proposed rule                                                                                thereunder,7 the CAT NMS Plan.8 The
                                                                                                              the Proposed Rule Change
                                                    change that are filed with the                                                                                   Participants filed the Plan to comply
                                                                                                                 The Exchange proposes to adopt a fee                with Rule 613 of Regulation NMS under
                                                    Commission, and all written
                                                                                                              schedule to establish the fees for                     the Exchange Act. The Plan was
                                                    communications relating to the
                                                                                                              Industry Members related to the                        published for comment in the Federal
                                                    proposed rule change between the
                                                                                                              National Market System Plan Governing                  Register on May 17, 2016,9 and
                                                    Commission and any person, other than
                                                                                                              the Consolidated Audit Trail (the ‘‘CAT                approved by the Commission, as
                                                    those that may be withheld from the
                                                                                                              NMS Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan’’) at Section X [sic]             modified, on November 15, 2016.10 The
                                                    public in accordance with the
                                                                                                              of the MRX Fee Schedule.                               Plan is designed to create, implement
                                                    provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be                          The text of the proposed rule change
                                                    available for Web site viewing and                                                                               and maintain a consolidated audit trail
                                                                                                              is available on the Exchange’s Web site                (‘‘CAT’’) that would capture customer
                                                    printing in the Commission’s Public                       at www.ise.com, at the principal office
                                                    Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,                                                                                and order event information for orders
                                                                                                              of the Exchange, and at the                            in NMS Securities and OTC Equity
                                                    Washington, DC 20549 on official                          Commission’s Public Reference Room.
                                                    business days between the hours of                                                                               Securities, across all markets, from the
                                                    10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the                    II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                     time of order inception through routing,
                                                    filing also will be available for                         Statement of the Purpose of, and                       cancellation, modification, or execution
                                                    inspection and copying at the principal                   Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                 in a single consolidated data source.
                                                    office of FICC and on DTCC’s Web site                     Change                                                 The Plan accomplishes this by creating
                                                                                                                                                                     CAT NMS, LLC (the ‘‘Company’’), of
                                                    (http://dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-                             In its filing with the Commission, the              which each Participant is a member, to
                                                    filings.aspx). All comments received                      Exchange included statements                           operate the CAT.11 Under the CAT NMS
                                                    will be posted without change; the                        concerning the purpose of and basis for                Plan, the Operating Committee of the
                                                    Commission does not edit personal                         the proposed rule change and discussed                 Company (‘‘Operating Committee’’) has
                                                    identifying information from                              any comments it received on the                        discretion to establish funding for the
                                                    submissions. You should submit only                       proposed rule change. The text of these                Company to operate the CAT, including
                                                    information that you wish to make                         statements may be examined at the                      establishing fees that the Participants
                                                    available publicly. All submissions                       places specified in Item IV below. The                 will pay, and establishing fees for
                                                    should refer to File Number SR–FICC–                      Exchange has prepared summaries, set                   Industry Members that will be
                                                    2017–013 and should be submitted on                       forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
                                                    or before June 14, 2017.                                  the most significant aspects of such                     4 ISE Gemini, LLC, ISE Mercury, LLC and

                                                      For the Commission, by the Division of                  statements.                                            International Securities Exchange, LLC have been
                                                    Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated                                                                       renamed Nasdaq GEMX, LLC, Nasdaq MRX, LLC,
                                                                                                              A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                      and Nasdaq ISE, LLC, respectively. See Securities
                                                    authority.12                                              Statement of the Purpose of, and the                   Exchange Act Release No. 80248 (March 15, 2017),
                                                    Eduardo A. Aleman,                                        Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                 82 FR 14547 (March 21, 2017); Securities Exchange
                                                    Assistant Secretary.                                      Change                                                 Act Release No. 80326 (March 29, 2017), 82 FR
                                                                                                                                                                     16460 (April 4, 2017); and Securities Exchange Act
                                                    [FR Doc. 2017–10585 Filed 5–23–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                              1. Purpose                                             Release No. 80325 (March 29, 2017), 82 FR 16445
                                                    BILLING CODE 8011–01–P                                                                                           (April 4, 2017).
                                                                                                                 The purpose of the proposed rule                      5 National Stock Exchange, Inc. has been renamed

                                                                                                              change is to adopt a fee schedule to                   NYSE National, Inc. See Securities Exchange Act
                                                    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                   establish the fees for Industry Members                Release No. 79902 (Jan. 30, 2017), 82 FR 9258
                                                                                                                                                                     (February 3, 2017).
                                                    COMMISSION                                                related to the CAT NMS Plan.                             6 15 U.S.C. 78k–1.
                                                                                                                 Bats BYX Exchange, Inc., Bats BZX                     7 17 CFR 242.608.
                                                    [Release No. 34–80726; File No. SR–MRX–                   Exchange, Inc., Bats EDGA Exchange,                      8 See Letter from the Participants to Brent J.
                                                    2017–04]
                                                                                                              Inc., Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc., BOX                    Fields, Secretary, Commission, dated September 30,
                                                    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq                     Options Exchange LLC, C2 Options                       2014; and Letter from Participants to Brent J. Fields,
                                                                                                              Exchange, Incorporated, Chicago Board                  Secretary, Commission, dated February 27, 2015.
                                                    MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and                                                                                   On December 24, 2015, the Participants submitted
                                                                                                              Options Exchange, Incorporated,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed                                                                              an amendment to the CAT NMS Plan. See Letter
                                                    Rule Change To Adopt Section IV of                        Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Financial                from Participants to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
                                                    the MRX Fee Schedule                                                                                             Commission, dated December 23, 2015.
                                                                                                                1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                                 9 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77724

                                                    May 18, 2017.                                               2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                  (April 27, 2016), 81 FR 30614 (May 17, 2016).
                                                                                                                 3 The Exchange originally filed the proposed rule     10 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79318
                                                      Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the                                                                            (November 15, 2016), 81 FR 84696 (November 23,
                                                                                                              change on May 3, 2017 under File No. SR–MRX–
                                                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’                  2017–03. The Exchange subsequently withdrew that       2016) (‘‘Approval Order’’).
                                                                                                              filing on May 12, 2017 and filed this proposed rule      11 The Plan also serves as the limited liability
                                                      12 17   CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).                            change.                                                company agreement for the Company.



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014     19:43 May 23, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00144   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM    24MYN1



Document Created: 2017-05-24 01:03:01
Document Modified: 2017-05-24 01:03:01
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation82 FR 23913 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR