82 FR 24525 - Safety Zone; Buffalo Carnival; Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 102 (May 30, 2017)

Page Range		24525-24527
FR Document		2017-11026

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on Lake Erie, Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of the Outer Harbor during the May 28, 2017 fireworks display. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect mariners and vessels from the navigational hazards associated with a fireworks display.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 102 (Tuesday, May 30, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 30, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24525-24527]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11026]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0408]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Buffalo Carnival; Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on 
Lake Erie, Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY. This safety zone is 
intended to restrict vessels from a portion of the Outer Harbor during 
the May 28, 2017 fireworks display. This temporary safety zone is 
necessary to protect mariners and vessels from the navigational hazards 
associated with a fireworks display.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8:45 p.m. until 9:45 p.m. on May 28, 
2017.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0408 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. 
Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9322, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that

[[Page 24526]]

good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking 
(NPRM) with respect to this rule because doing so would be 
impracticable. The final details of this event were not known to the 
Coast Guard until there was insufficient time remaining before the 
event to publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date of this 
rule to wait for a comment period to run would be impracticable because 
it would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect mariners and 
vessels from the hazards associated with a maritime fireworks display. 
Therefore, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days 
after publication in the Federal Register.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP) has determined that a 
maritime fireworks show presents significant risks to public safety and 
property. Such hazards include premature and accidental detonations, 
dangerous projectiles, and falling or burning debris. This rule is 
needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the 
navigable waters within the safety zone while the fireworks show is 
taking place.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone on May 28, 2017 from 8:45 p.m. 
until 9:45 p.m. The safety zone will encompass all waters of the 
Buffalo Outer Harbor contained within a 280-foot radius of position 
42[deg]52'10.75'' N. and 078[deg]52'56.01'' W. (NAD 83).
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his 
designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his 
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive order related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing 
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs''), directs agencies to 
reduce regulation and control regulatory costs and provides that ``for 
every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be 
identified for elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be 
prudently managed and controlled through a budgeting process.''
    This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory 
action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    As this rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule is 
exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's 
Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the 
Executive Order of January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing Regulation and 
Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action 
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy, 
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the 
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel 
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be 
relatively small and enforced for a relatively short time. Also, the 
safety zone is designed to minimize its impact on navigable waters. 
Furthermore, the safety zone has been designed to allow vessels to 
transit around it. Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within that 
particular area are expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, 
moreover, vessels may still transit through the safety zone when 
permitted by the Captain of the Port.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This 
safety zone would be effective, and thus subject to enforcement for 
only one hour late in the evening. Traffic may be allowed to pass 
through the zone with the permission of the Captain of the Port. The 
Captain of the Port can be reached via VHF channel 16. Before the 
enforcement of the zone, we would issue local Broadcast Notice to 
Mariners.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial

[[Page 24527]]

direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between 
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 
power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian 
tribes. If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that it 
is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule creates a temporary safety zone and is categorically excluded 
under section 2.B.2, figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g) of the Instruction, 
which pertains to establisnment of safety zones. A Record of 
Environmental Consideration (REC) supporting this determination is 
available in the docket where indicated in the ADDRESSES section of 
this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0408 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0408   Safety Zone; Buffalo Carnival, Buffalo Outer 
Harbor; Buffalo, NY.

    (a) Location. This zone will encompass all waters of Buffalo Outer 
Harbor, Buffalo, NY contained within a 280-foot radius of position 
42[deg]52''10.76'' N. and 078[deg]52'56.01'' W. (NAD 83).
    (b) Enforcement period. This rule is effective on May 28, 2017 from 
8:45 p.m. until 9:45 p.m.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within 
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his 
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety 
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of 
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: May 23, 2017.
J.S. Dufresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2017-11026 Filed 5-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

24526 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

good cause exists for not publishing a approaches that maximize net benefits. substantial number of small entities for
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the the following reasons: This safety zone
with respect to this rule because doing importance of quantifying both costs would be effective, and thus subject to
so would be impracticable. The final and benefits, of reducing costs, of enforcement for only one hour late in
details of this event were not known to harmonizing rules, and of promoting the evening. Traffic may be allowed to
the Coast Guard until there was flexibility. Executive Order 13771 pass through the zone with the
insufficient time remaining before the (‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling permission of the Captain of the Port.
event to publish an NPRM. Thus, Regulatory Costs’’), directs agencies to The Captain of the Port can be reached
delaying the effective date of this rule to reduce regulation and control regulatory via VHF channel 16. Before the
wait for a comment period to run would costs and provides that ‘‘for every one enforcement of the zone, we would
be impracticable because it would new regulation issued, at least two prior issue local Broadcast Notice to
inhibit the Coast Guard’s ability to regulations be identified for elimination, Mariners.
protect mariners and vessels from the and that the cost of planned regulations Under section 213(a) of the Small
hazards associated with a maritime be prudently managed and controlled Business Regulatory Enforcement
fireworks display. Therefore, under 5 through a budgeting process.’’ Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds This rule has not been designated a we want to assist small entities in
that good cause exists for making this ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under understanding this rule. If the rule
temporary rule effective less than 30 Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it would affect your small business,
days after publication in the Federal has not been reviewed by the Office of organization, or governmental
Register. Management and Budget. jurisdiction and you have questions
As this rule is not a significant concerning its provisions or options for
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule regulatory action, this rule is exempt compliance, please contact the person
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule from the requirements of Executive listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum CONTACT section.
Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP) has titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing Small businesses may send comments
determined that a maritime fireworks Section 2 of the Executive Order of on the actions of Federal employees
show presents significant risks to public January 30, 2017 titled ‘Reducing who enforce, or otherwise determine
safety and property. Such hazards Regulation and Controlling Regulatory compliance with, Federal regulations to
include premature and accidental Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017). the Small Business and Agriculture
detonations, dangerous projectiles, and We conclude that this rule is not a Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
falling or burning debris. This rule is significant regulatory action because we and the Regional Small Business
needed to protect personnel, vessels, anticipate that it will have minimal Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
and the marine environment in the impact on the economy, will not Ombudsman evaluates these actions
navigable waters within the safety zone interfere with other agencies, will not annually and rates each agency’s
while the fireworks show is taking adversely alter the budget of any grant responsiveness to small business. If you
place. or loan recipients, and will not raise any wish to comment on actions by
novel legal or policy issues. The safety employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
IV. Discussion of the Rule zone created by this rule will be 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
This rule establishes a safety zone on relatively small and enforced for a Coast Guard will not retaliate against
May 28, 2017 from 8:45 p.m. until 9:45 relatively short time. Also, the safety small entities that question or complain
p.m. The safety zone will encompass all zone is designed to minimize its impact about this rule or any policy or action
waters of the Buffalo Outer Harbor on navigable waters. Furthermore, the of the Coast Guard.
contained within a 280-foot radius of safety zone has been designed to allow
vessels to transit around it. Thus, C. Collection of Information
position 42°52′10.75″ N. and
078°52′56.01″ W. (NAD 83). restrictions on vessel movement within This rule will not call for a new
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring that particular area are expected to be collection of information under the
within the safety zone is prohibited minimal. Under certain conditions, Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
unless authorized by the Captain of the moreover, vessels may still transit U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene through the safety zone when permitted
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
representative. The Captain of the Port by the Captain of the Port.
Governments
or his designated on-scene B. Impact on Small Entities
representative may be contacted via A rule has implications for federalism
VHF Channel 16. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of under Executive Order 13132,
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
V. Regulatory Analyses requires Federal agencies to consider effect on the States, on the relationship
We developed this rule after the potential impact of regulations on between the national government and
considering numerous statutes and small entities during rulemaking. The the States, or on the distribution of
Executive order related to rulemaking. term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small power and responsibilities among the
Below we summarize our analyses businesses, not-for-profit organizations various levels of government. We have
based on a number of these statutes and that are independently owned and analyzed this rule under that Order and
Executive orders, and we discuss First operated and are not dominant in their have determined that it is consistent
Amendment rights of protestors. fields, and governmental jurisdictions with the fundamental federalism
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

with populations of less than 50,000. principles and preemption requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. described in Executive Order 13132.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 605(b) that this rule will not have a Also, this rule does not have tribal
direct agencies to assess the costs and significant economic impact on a implications under Executive Order
benefits of available regulatory substantial number of small entities. 13175, Consultation and Coordination
alternatives and, if regulation is This safety zone will not have a with Indian Tribal Governments,
necessary, to select regulatory significant economic impact on a because it does not have a substantial

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 May 26, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM 30MYR1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 24527

direct effect on one or more Indian For the reasons discussed in the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
tribes, on the relationship between the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 AGENCY
Federal Government and Indian tribes, CFR part 165 as follows:
or on the distribution of power and 40 CFR Part 52
responsibilities between the Federal PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
Government and Indian tribes. If you AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS [EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0772; FRL–9962–82–
believe this rule has implications for Region 9]
federalism or Indian tribes, please ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
contact the person listed in the FOR continues to read as follows: Determination of Attainment and
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section Approval of Base Year Emissions
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; Inventories for the Imperial County,
above.
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; California Fine Particulate Matter
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Department of Homeland Security Delegation Nonattainment Area; Correction
No. 0170.1.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act AGENCY: Environmental Protection
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires ■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0408 to read as
Agency (EPA).
Federal agencies to assess the effects of follows:
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
their discretionary regulatory actions. In § 165.T09–0408 Safety Zone; Buffalo amendment.
particular, the Act addresses actions Carnival, Buffalo Outer Harbor; Buffalo, NY.
that may result in the expenditure by a SUMMARY: On March 13, 2017, the
State, local, or tribal government, in the (a) Location. This zone will Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
aggregate, or by the private sector of encompass all waters of Buffalo Outer published a direct final rule in the
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or Harbor, Buffalo, NY contained within a Federal Register determining that the
more in any one year. Though this rule 280-foot radius of position 42°52″10.76″ Imperial County, California Moderate
will not result in such an expenditure, N. and 078°52′56.01″ W. (NAD 83). nonattainment area (‘‘the Imperial
we do discuss the effects of this rule (b) Enforcement period. This rule is County NA’’) attained the 2006 24-hour
elsewhere in this preamble. effective on May 28, 2017 from 8:45 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national
F. Environment p.m. until 9:45 p.m. ambient air quality standard. In the
same action, the EPA approved a
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with revision to California’s state
We have analyzed this rule under
the general regulations in § 165.23 of implementation plan (SIP) consisting of
Department of Homeland Security
this part, entry into, transiting, or the 2008 emissions inventory for the
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, anchoring within this safety zone is Imperial County NA submitted by the
which guide the Coast Guard in prohibited unless authorized by the California Air Resources Board (CARB
complying with the National Captain of the Port Buffalo or his or ‘‘State’’) on January 9, 2015. The
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 designated on-scene representative. EPA’s description in regulatory text of
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have (2) This safety zone is closed to all the SIP element that was approved
determined that it is one of a category vessel traffic, except as may be inadvertently included information
of actions that do not individually or permitted by the Captain of the Port unrelated to the 2008 emissions
cumulatively have a significant effect on Buffalo or his designated on-scene inventory. This document corrects the
the human environment. This rule representative. regulatory text to clarify the provisions
creates a temporary safety zone and is of the SIP that are approved.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
categorically excluded under section DATES: This correcting amendment is
2.B.2, figure 2–1, paragraph 34(g) of the the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
effective on May 30, 2017.
Instruction, which pertains to Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
establisnment of safety zones. A Record Ginger Vagenas, EPA Region IX, (415)
of Environmental Consideration (REC) by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
on his behalf. 972–3964, Vagenas.Ginger@epa.gov.
supporting this determination is
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
available in the docket where indicated (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
in the ADDRESSES section of this action corrects an inadvertent error in a
or operate within the safety zone must
preamble. rulemaking related to the EPA’s
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
approval of the 2008 emissions
G. Protest Activities or his on-scene representative to obtain inventory for the Imperial County NA.
permission to do so. The Captain of the On March 13, 2017, the EPA published
The Coast Guard respects the First Port Buffalo or his on-scene a direct final rule approving a revision
Amendment rights of protesters. representative may be contacted via of the California SIP—specifically, we
Protesters are asked to contact the VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given approved the portion of Chapter 3 of
person listed in the FOR FURTHER permission to enter or operate in the CARB’s January 9, 2015 submittal that
INFORMATION CONTACT section to safety zone must comply with all contains the 2008 emissions inventory
coordinate protest activities so that your directions given to them by the Captain for the Imperial County NA. This action
message can be received without of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene contained amendatory instructions that
jeopardizing the safety or security of representative. added paragraph (484) to 40 CFR
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

people, places or vessels. 52.220(c). However, in the amendatory
Dated: May 23, 2017.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 instructions the EPA inadvertently
J.S. Dufresne,
failed to exclude Section 3.4.2
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the (‘‘Determination of Significant Sources
Port Buffalo.
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping of PM2.5’’) from the portions of the SIP
requirements, Security measures, [FR Doc. 2017–11026 Filed 5–26–17; 8:45 am] we intended to approve. This document
Waterways. BILLING CODE 9110–04–P corrects that error.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 May 26, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM 30MYR1

Document Created: 2018-11-08 08:54:41
Document Modified: 2018-11-08 08:54:41

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 8:45 p.m. until 9:45 p.m. on May 28, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9322, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 24525
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

82 FR 24525 - Safety Zone; Buffalo Carnival; Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 102 (May 30, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard