82_FR_24766 82 FR 24664 - Agency Information Collection Activities, Comments Request: Evaluation of Alternatives To Improve Elderly Access

82 FR 24664 - Agency Information Collection Activities, Comments Request: Evaluation of Alternatives To Improve Elderly Access

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 102 (May 30, 2017)

Page Range24664-24667
FR Document2017-11028

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment on the proposed collection of information for the Evaluation of Alternatives to Improve Elderly Access. This is a NEW information collection. This study will provide FNS with a better understanding of the barriers to serving elderly populations in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the extent to which available policy options improve program access, whether certain program models or combinations are more effective than others, and what tradeoffs exist between program simplification/access goals and ensuring benefit adequacy.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 102 (Tuesday, May 30, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24664-24667]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Nutrition Service


Agency Information Collection Activities, Comments Request: 
Evaluation of Alternatives To Improve Elderly Access

AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment 
on the proposed collection of information for the Evaluation of 
Alternatives to Improve Elderly Access. This is a NEW information 
collection. This study will provide FNS with a better understanding of 
the barriers to serving elderly populations in the Supplemental 
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the extent to which available 
policy options improve program access, whether certain program models 
or combinations are more effective than others, and what tradeoffs 
exist between program simplification/access goals and ensuring benefit 
adequacy.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 31, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to Kameron Burt, Social Science Policy 
Analyst, Office of Policy Support, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 
3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may 
also be submitted via fax to the attention of Kameron Burt at 703-305-
2576 or via email to [email protected]. Comments will also be 
accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to http://www.regulations.gov, and follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments electronically.
    All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the 
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will 
be a matter of public record.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the 
proposed project, or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans 
contact Kameron Burt, Social Science Policy Analyst, Office of Policy 
Support, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 
1014, Alexandria, VA 22302; Fax: 703-305-2576; Email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the 
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the 
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
that were used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 
of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden 
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including 
use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other 
technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.
    Title: Evaluation of Alternatives to Improve Elderly Access.
    Form Number: [If applicable, insert number].
    OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
    Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
    Type of Request: New collection.
    Abstract: The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), under authorization 
of SEC. 17. [7 U.S.C. 2026] of the FOOD AND NUTRITION ACT OF 2008, as 
amended, intends to conduct the Evaluation of Alternatives to Improve 
Elderly Access. FNS is interested in exploring whether policy options 
designed to improve access to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance 
Program (SNAP) for the elderly are effective. The objective of the 
study is to better understand how to maximize elder (60+) access to 
SNAP. The evaluation will have four key components:
    (1) Exploratory Study: To ground the study plan and subsequent 
components of the study, the project began with an initial exploratory 
research phase to determine what is known about elder SNAP 
participation levels and caseload dynamics over time, factors 
influencing elder participation in SNAP, and the scope, range, and 
effects of State interventions for elders to date. The exploratory 
study drew primarily on existing data, including SNAP Quality Control 
(QC) data from Fiscal Years 2010 to 2015 and an index of State policy 
options, and a literature review, supplemented by discussions with FNS 
Regional and National office staff and experts from advocacy groups.
    (2) Study of State Interventions: The Study of State Interventions 
will document the design, implementation, and operation of 
interventions intended to increase access to SNAP among the elderly 
population in the selected States. This component will provide a 
comprehensive understanding of the interventions, helping us to 
interpret the effects or lack thereof observed in the Study of 
Intervention Effects, draw lessons on how aspects of the interventions 
may be improved, and assess whether the interventions, if implemented 
in other locations or contexts, might yield similar outcomes. The 
primary source of data for this study component will be the extensive 
information collected during three-day site visits to each of the ten 
selected States.
    (3) Study of elder participant perspectives: The purpose of the 
study is to gather direct input from elders about their awareness of 
SNAP, perceptions of the program, and experiences applying for and 
receiving SNAP benefits. Key data collection activities for this 
component will include: Phone screenings with elderly individuals to 
confirm eligibility and schedule interviews (560 individuals will be 
screened to result in 280 scheduled interviews); semi-structured 
interviews with 200 elderly eligible individuals (out of the 280 
scheduled interviews) grouped into three categories (SNAP participants, 
non-participating applicants, and non-participants). FNS plans to 
contact or recruit another 115 individuals 60+ to participate in the 
focus group. Out of the 115 contacted, 80 will go on to participate in 
the actual focus group. These focus groups will be used to validate and 
explore key themes that emerge in the interviews. Overall, the 
expectation is that out of the total 675 elderly individuals contacted, 
395 will not respond or choose not to take part in the study.
    (4) Study of State Intervention Effects: The objective of the Study 
of State Intervention Effects is to assess the relative association 
between State interventions and key program outcomes, including elderly 
SNAP application trends and caseloads, and rates of churning. The focus 
of this analysis will be on the interventions that are specifically 
targeted to elderly households (in addition to the Community Partner 
Interview Demonstration (CPID)). The study team identified the 
following interventions as being of particular interest to the study 
because they either aim at increasing the enrollment of elderly 
participants or hold particular promise in this regard: Elderly 
Simplified Application Project (ESAP); Standard Medical Deduction 
(SMD); CPID; Combined Application

[[Page 24665]]

Project (CAP); participating in a 36-Month Certification Demonstration; 
and having a 36-month certification or recertification interview 
waiver.
    The key data source for this study will be a longitudinal file for 
each State that will be built by requesting caseload data from each 
study State for a period of time beginning 12 months before the 
implementation of an intervention and continuing through 12 months 
after implementation.
    Affected Public: Respondent categories of affected public and the 
corresponding study participants will include: State and Local or 
Tribal Government [Agency SNAP Directors and selected State and county 
government staff], Non-profit Business organizations [Organizations 
serving elderly individuals and Community Based Organizations], and 
Individuals & Households [Elderly 60+ Recipients, Non-recipients, and 
Non-participating applicants].
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,018 (675 Individuals/Households, 
90 Businesses and 253 State employees).
    Out of the 1,018 contacted, 660 are estimated to participate as 
respondents and 358 are estimated to not partake, who are considered 
our non-respondent group. The break out is as follows: The total 
estimated number of respondents includes: Out of 13 State SNAP 
Directors, 10 State SNAP Directors will participate; out of 70 State 
SNAP Administrative Staff, 70 State SNAP Administrative Staff will 
participate; out of 675 Individuals/Households, 360 Individuals 
Households (Elderly SNAP Recipients 60+ and Non-recipients, and Non-
participating applicants) will participate; out of 50 Non-profit 
Organizations (Organizations serving elderly individuals) contacted, 40 
will participate; out of 20 County Government SNAP Directors contacted, 
20 will participate; out of 50 State and County Staff (Partner 
Agencies) contacted, 30 will participate; out of 100 County SNAP Staff 
contacted, 100 will participate; and out of 40 Non-profit Organizations 
(Community Based Organizations) contacted, 30 will.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.28.
    The estimated number of responses per State Government SNAP 
Director is two: 10 State SNAP Directors will complete a Memorandum of 
Understanding with the research team; the same 10 State SNAP Directors 
will also take part in an interview lasting approximately 1 hour.
    The estimated number of responses per State SNAP Administrative 
Staff is one: 20 respondents will prepare and provide caseload data 
files; 50 other respondents will take part in an interview.
    The estimated number of responses per Individual Household (Elderly 
SNAP Recipients and Non-recipients) is one: 200 respondents will take 
part in an interview; 80 other respondents will take part in a focus 
group discussion (additionally, 395 other elderly individuals will be 
screened and/or have an interview or focus group scheduled but will not 
complete that activity).
    The estimated number of responses per Non-profit Organization 
(Organizations serving elderly individuals) is one: 40 respondents will 
provide assistance with recruiting participants for interviews and 
focus groups.
    The estimated number of responses per Non-profit Organizations 
(Community Based Organizations) is one: 30 respondents will participate 
in interviews as part of the study of State interventions.
    The estimated number of responses per County Government SNAP 
Director is one: 20 respondents will take part in an interview.
    The estimated number of responses per State and County Staff 
(Partner Agencies) is one: 30 respondents will take part in an 
interview.
    The estimated number of responses per County SNAP Staff is one: 100 
respondents will take part in an interview.
    Estimated Total Annual Responses: 1,308.
    Estimated Time per Response: 1.0515 hours.
    The estimated time of response varies from one to 20 hours 
depending on respondent group and data collection activity, as shown in 
the table below, with an average estimated time of 1.53 hours for all 
participants (the average estimated time is .10 hours for non-
respondents). Twenty State SNAP Administrative Staff will spend an 
estimated 20 hours to prepare and provide caseload data files, and 10 
State Government SNAP Directors will spend an estimated 10 hours to 
complete a Memorandum of Understanding with the research team. All 
other data collection activities produce a burden of 1.5 hours or less.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1,375.40 hours.
    See Table 1 below for estimated total annual burden for each type 
of respondent.

    Dated: May 18, 2017.
Jessica Shahin,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
 BILLING CODE 3410-30-P

[[Page 24666]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30MY17.012


[[Page 24667]]


[FR Doc. 2017-11028 Filed 5-26-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3410-30-C



                                                24664                          Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 30, 2017 / Notices

                                                  Dated: May 18, 2017.                                  Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria,                  and operation of interventions intended
                                                Jessica Shahin,                                         VA 22302; Fax: 703–305–2576; Email:                   to increase access to SNAP among the
                                                Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition                kameron.burt@fns.usda.gov.                            elderly population in the selected
                                                Service.                                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments                   States. This component will provide a
                                                [FR Doc. 2017–11029 Filed 5–26–17; 8:45 am]             are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed              comprehensive understanding of the
                                                BILLING CODE 3410–30–P                                  collection of information is necessary                interventions, helping us to interpret the
                                                                                                        for the proper performance of the                     effects or lack thereof observed in the
                                                                                                        functions of the agency, including                    Study of Intervention Effects, draw
                                                DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE                               whether the information shall have                    lessons on how aspects of the
                                                                                                        practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the            interventions may be improved, and
                                                Food and Nutrition Service                              agency’s estimate of the burden of the                assess whether the interventions, if
                                                                                                        proposed collection of information,                   implemented in other locations or
                                                Agency Information Collection                                                                                 contexts, might yield similar outcomes.
                                                Activities, Comments Request:                           including the validity of the
                                                                                                        methodology and assumptions that were                 The primary source of data for this
                                                Evaluation of Alternatives To Improve                                                                         study component will be the extensive
                                                Elderly Access                                          used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
                                                                                                        utility, and clarity of the information to            information collected during three-day
                                                AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service                      be collected; and (d) ways to minimize                site visits to each of the ten selected
                                                (FNS), USDA.                                            the burden of the collection of                       States.
                                                                                                                                                                 (3) Study of elder participant
                                                ACTION: Notice and request for                          information on those who are to
                                                                                                                                                              perspectives: The purpose of the study
                                                comments.                                               respond, including use of appropriate
                                                                                                                                                              is to gather direct input from elders
                                                                                                        automated, electronic, mechanical, or
                                                SUMMARY:   In accordance with the                                                                             about their awareness of SNAP,
                                                                                                        other technological collection
                                                Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this                                                                         perceptions of the program, and
                                                                                                        techniques or other forms of information
                                                notice invites the general public and                                                                         experiences applying for and receiving
                                                                                                        technology.
                                                other public agencies to comment on the                                                                       SNAP benefits. Key data collection
                                                                                                           Title: Evaluation of Alternatives to
                                                proposed collection of information for                                                                        activities for this component will
                                                                                                        Improve Elderly Access.
                                                the Evaluation of Alternatives to                                                                             include: Phone screenings with elderly
                                                                                                           Form Number: [If applicable, insert
                                                Improve Elderly Access. This is a NEW                                                                         individuals to confirm eligibility and
                                                                                                        number].                                              schedule interviews (560 individuals
                                                information collection. This study will                    OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
                                                provide FNS with a better                                                                                     will be screened to result in 280
                                                                                                           Expiration Date: Not yet determined.               scheduled interviews); semi-structured
                                                understanding of the barriers to serving                   Type of Request: New collection.
                                                elderly populations in the Supplemental                                                                       interviews with 200 elderly eligible
                                                                                                           Abstract: The Food and Nutrition                   individuals (out of the 280 scheduled
                                                Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)                     Service (FNS), under authorization of
                                                and the extent to which available policy                                                                      interviews) grouped into three
                                                                                                        SEC. 17. [7 U.S.C. 2026] of the FOOD                  categories (SNAP participants, non-
                                                options improve program access,                         AND NUTRITION ACT OF 2008, as
                                                whether certain program models or                                                                             participating applicants, and non-
                                                                                                        amended, intends to conduct the                       participants). FNS plans to contact or
                                                combinations are more effective than                    Evaluation of Alternatives to Improve
                                                others, and what tradeoffs exist between                                                                      recruit another 115 individuals 60+ to
                                                                                                        Elderly Access. FNS is interested in                  participate in the focus group. Out of
                                                program simplification/access goals and                 exploring whether policy options
                                                ensuring benefit adequacy.                                                                                    the 115 contacted, 80 will go on to
                                                                                                        designed to improve access to the                     participate in the actual focus group.
                                                DATES: Written comments must be                         Supplemental Nutrition Assistance                     These focus groups will be used to
                                                received on or before July 31, 2017.                    Program (SNAP) for the elderly are                    validate and explore key themes that
                                                ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to                      effective. The objective of the study is              emerge in the interviews. Overall, the
                                                Kameron Burt, Social Science Policy                     to better understand how to maximize                  expectation is that out of the total 675
                                                Analyst, Office of Policy Support, Food                 elder (60+) access to SNAP. The                       elderly individuals contacted, 395 will
                                                and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park                  evaluation will have four key                         not respond or choose not to take part
                                                Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria,                    components:                                           in the study.
                                                VA 22302. Comments may also be                             (1) Exploratory Study: To ground the                  (4) Study of State Intervention Effects:
                                                submitted via fax to the attention of                   study plan and subsequent components                  The objective of the Study of State
                                                Kameron Burt at 703–305–2576 or via                     of the study, the project began with an               Intervention Effects is to assess the
                                                email to kameron.burt@fns.usda.gov.                     initial exploratory research phase to                 relative association between State
                                                Comments will also be accepted through                  determine what is known about elder                   interventions and key program
                                                the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to                   SNAP participation levels and caseload                outcomes, including elderly SNAP
                                                http://www.regulations.gov, and follow                  dynamics over time, factors influencing               application trends and caseloads, and
                                                the online instructions for submitting                  elder participation in SNAP, and the                  rates of churning. The focus of this
                                                comments electronically.                                scope, range, and effects of State                    analysis will be on the interventions
                                                  All responses to this notice will be                  interventions for elders to date. The                 that are specifically targeted to elderly
                                                summarized and included in the request                  exploratory study drew primarily on                   households (in addition to the
                                                for Office of Management and Budget                     existing data, including SNAP Quality                 Community Partner Interview
                                                approval. All comments will be a matter                 Control (QC) data from Fiscal Years                   Demonstration (CPID)). The study team
                                                of public record.                                       2010 to 2015 and an index of State
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                              identified the following interventions as
                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To                     policy options, and a literature review,              being of particular interest to the study
                                                request more information on the                         supplemented by discussions with FNS                  because they either aim at increasing the
                                                proposed project, or to obtain a copy of                Regional and National office staff and                enrollment of elderly participants or
                                                the data collection plans contact                       experts from advocacy groups.                         hold particular promise in this regard:
                                                Kameron Burt, Social Science Policy                        (2) Study of State Interventions: The              Elderly Simplified Application Project
                                                Analyst, Office of Policy Support, Food                 Study of State Interventions will                     (ESAP); Standard Medical Deduction
                                                and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park                  document the design, implementation,                  (SMD); CPID; Combined Application


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:59 May 26, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00006   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM   30MYN1


                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 30, 2017 / Notices                                              24665

                                                Project (CAP); participating in a 36-                   participate; out of 20 County                         interviews as part of the study of State
                                                Month Certification Demonstration; and                  Government SNAP Directors contacted,                  interventions.
                                                having a 36-month certification or                      20 will participate; out of 50 State and                 The estimated number of responses
                                                recertification interview waiver.                       County Staff (Partner Agencies)                       per County Government SNAP Director
                                                   The key data source for this study will              contacted, 30 will participate; out of 100            is one: 20 respondents will take part in
                                                be a longitudinal file for each State that              County SNAP Staff contacted, 100 will                 an interview.
                                                will be built by requesting caseload data               participate; and out of 40 Non-profit                    The estimated number of responses
                                                from each study State for a period of                   Organizations (Community Based                        per State and County Staff (Partner
                                                time beginning 12 months before the                     Organizations) contacted, 30 will.                    Agencies) is one: 30 respondents will
                                                implementation of an intervention and                     Estimated Number of Responses per                   take part in an interview.
                                                continuing through 12 months after                      Respondent: 1.28.                                        The estimated number of responses
                                                implementation.                                           The estimated number of responses
                                                                                                                                                              per County SNAP Staff is one: 100
                                                   Affected Public: Respondent                          per State Government SNAP Director is
                                                                                                                                                              respondents will take part in an
                                                categories of affected public and the                   two: 10 State SNAP Directors will
                                                                                                                                                              interview.
                                                corresponding study participants will                   complete a Memorandum of
                                                                                                        Understanding with the research team;                    Estimated Total Annual Responses:
                                                include: State and Local or Tribal                                                                            1,308.
                                                Government [Agency SNAP Directors                       the same 10 State SNAP Directors will
                                                                                                        also take part in an interview lasting                   Estimated Time per Response: 1.0515
                                                and selected State and county                                                                                 hours.
                                                government staff], Non-profit Business                  approximately 1 hour.
                                                                                                          The estimated number of responses                      The estimated time of response varies
                                                organizations [Organizations serving                                                                          from one to 20 hours depending on
                                                                                                        per State SNAP Administrative Staff is
                                                elderly individuals and Community                                                                             respondent group and data collection
                                                                                                        one: 20 respondents will prepare and
                                                Based Organizations], and Individuals &                                                                       activity, as shown in the table below,
                                                                                                        provide caseload data files; 50 other
                                                Households [Elderly 60+ Recipients,                                                                           with an average estimated time of 1.53
                                                                                                        respondents will take part in an
                                                Non-recipients, and Non-participating                   interview.                                            hours for all participants (the average
                                                applicants].                                              The estimated number of responses                   estimated time is .10 hours for non-
                                                   Estimated Number of Respondents:                     per Individual Household (Elderly                     respondents). Twenty State SNAP
                                                1,018 (675 Individuals/Households, 90                   SNAP Recipients and Non-recipients) is                Administrative Staff will spend an
                                                Businesses and 253 State employees).                    one: 200 respondents will take part in                estimated 20 hours to prepare and
                                                   Out of the 1,018 contacted, 660 are                  an interview; 80 other respondents will               provide caseload data files, and 10 State
                                                estimated to participate as respondents                 take part in a focus group discussion                 Government SNAP Directors will spend
                                                and 358 are estimated to not partake,                   (additionally, 395 other elderly                      an estimated 10 hours to complete a
                                                who are considered our non-respondent                   individuals will be screened and/or                   Memorandum of Understanding with
                                                group. The break out is as follows: The                 have an interview or focus group                      the research team. All other data
                                                total estimated number of respondents                   scheduled but will not complete that                  collection activities produce a burden of
                                                includes: Out of 13 State SNAP                          activity).                                            1.5 hours or less.
                                                Directors, 10 State SNAP Directors will                   The estimated number of responses                      Estimated Total Annual Burden on
                                                participate; out of 70 State SNAP                       per Non-profit Organization                           Respondents: 1,375.40 hours.
                                                Administrative Staff, 70 State SNAP                     (Organizations serving elderly                           See Table 1 below for estimated total
                                                Administrative Staff will participate;                  individuals) is one: 40 respondents will              annual burden for each type of
                                                out of 675 Individuals/Households, 360                  provide assistance with recruiting                    respondent.
                                                Individuals Households (Elderly SNAP                    participants for interviews and focus
                                                Recipients 60+ and Non-recipients, and                  groups.                                                 Dated: May 18, 2017.
                                                Non-participating applicants) will                        The estimated number of responses                   Jessica Shahin,
                                                participate; out of 50 Non-profit                       per Non-profit Organizations                          Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition
                                                Organizations (Organizations serving                    (Community Based Organizations) is                    Service.
                                                elderly individuals) contacted, 40 will                 one: 30 respondents will participate in               BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:59 May 26, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00007   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM   30MYN1


                                                24666                           Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 30, 2017 / Notices

                                                        Table 1: Estimated Total Burden per Respondent Type




                                                                                                         200.0       1.0      200.0     1.0     200.0       80.0     1.0     80.0    0.1   6.4    206.4




                                                                                                          80.0       1.0      80.0      1.5     120.0       35.0     1.0     35.0    0.1   2.8    122.8




                                                                                                          10.0       1.0      10.0      10.0    100.0        3.0     1.0     3.0     3.0   9.0    109.0




                                                          Director*


                                                                                                          10.0       1.0      10.0      1.0         10.0     0.0     0.0      0.0    0.0   0.0    10.0




                                                                                               20.0       20.0       1.0      20.0      20.0    400.0        0.0     0.0      0.0    0.0   0.0    400.0




                                                                                                          50.0       1.0      50.0      1.0     50.0         0.0     0.0      0.0    0.0   0.0    50.0



                                                                                                          20.0       1.0      20.0      1.0     20.0         0.0     0.0      0.0    0.0   0.0    20.0




                                                                                               50.0       30.0       1.0      30.0      1.0     30.0        20.0     1.0     20.0    0.1   1.6    31.6




                                                                                              100.0      100.0       1.0      100.0     1.0     100.0        0.0     0.0      0.0    0.0   0.0    100.0




                                                                                                                                                            23.0     1.0     23.0    0.5   10.6   720.6
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                                                          EN30MY17.012</GPH>




                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014    19:59 May 26, 2017   Jkt 241001     PO 00000   Frm 00008   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 9990     E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM   30MYN1


                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 30, 2017 / Notices                                           24667

                                                [FR Doc. 2017–11028 Filed 5–26–17; 8:45 am]             quality, utility, and clarity of the                  SFSP, Child and Adult Care Food
                                                BILLING CODE 3410–30–C                                  information to be collected; and (d)                  Program (CACFP), and Special Milk
                                                                                                        ways to minimize the burden of the                    Program for Children (SMP). At the
                                                                                                        collection of information on those who                State level, school meal programs are
                                                DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE                               are to respond, including use of                      administered by State agencies
                                                                                                        appropriate automated, electronic,                    (typically State Departments of
                                                Food and Nutrition Service                              mechanical, or other technological                    Education or Agriculture).
                                                                                                        collection techniques or other forms of               Approximately 20,000 SFAs, which can
                                                Agency Information Collection                                                                                 consist of a school, school district, or
                                                                                                        information technology.
                                                Activities: Proposed Collection;                          Comments may be sent to: Ashley                     multiple districts, are responsible for
                                                Comment Request—Study of School                         Chaifetz, Ph.D., Social Science Research              administering and ensuring eligibility is
                                                Food Authority (SFA) Procurement                        Analyst, Special Nutrition Evaluation                 met for the school meal programs,
                                                Practices                                               Branch, Food and Nutrition Service,                   including procurement. School food
                                                AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service                      USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive,                         procurement consists mainly of
                                                (FNS), United States Department of                      Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may                    commercial food purchases, but USDA
                                                Agriculture (USDA).                                     also be submitted via fax to the attention            Foods also make up a portion of the
                                                ACTION: Notice and request for                          of Ashley Chaifetz at 703–305–2576 or                 items purchased.
                                                                                                        via email to Ashley.Chaifetz@                            For each meal served by the NSLP,
                                                comments.
                                                                                                        fns.usda.gov. Comments will also be                   the SFA receives entitlement dollars to
                                                SUMMARY:   In accordance with the                       accepted through the Federal                          purchase USDA Foods, which can
                                                Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this                   eRulemaking Portal. Go to http://                     include purchasing items directly from
                                                notice invites the general public and                   www.regulations.gov and follow the                    the USDA or diverting bulk ingredients
                                                other public agencies to comment on                     online instructions for submitting                    for further processing. SFAs can also
                                                this proposed information collection.                   comments electronically.                              use their entitlement dollars to purchase
                                                This collection is a new information                      All responses to this notice will be                fresh produce from the USDA
                                                collection for the Study of School Food                 summarized and included in the request                Department of Defense Fresh Fruit and
                                                Authority (SFA) Procurement Practices.                  for Office of Management and Budget                   Vegetable program (USDA DoD Fresh)
                                                This study is intended to describe and                  (OMB) approval. All comments will be                  or the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable
                                                assess the practices of SFAs related to                 a matter of public record.                            Program (FFVP). Additionally, some
                                                procuring goods and services for school                 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
                                                                                                                                                              SFAs contract with an FSMC to manage
                                                meal programs (e.g., National School                                                                          on-site operations, including
                                                                                                        request more information on the
                                                Lunch Program [NSLP] and the School                                                                           procurement; others enter into group
                                                                                                        proposed project, contact Ashley
                                                Breakfast Program [SBP]), and to better                                                                       purchasing agreements or use
                                                                                                        Chaifetz, Ph.D., Social Science Research
                                                understand how SFAs make decisions                                                                            procurement methods such as small and
                                                                                                        Analyst, Special Nutrition Evaluation
                                                that lead to these procurement practices.                                                                     micro-purchases.
                                                                                                        Branch, Food and Nutrition Service,                      The objectives of the study include
                                                The SFA Procurement Practices study                     USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive,
                                                will go beyond previous studies that                                                                          the following:
                                                                                                        Alexandria, VA 22302; Fax: 703–305–
                                                concentrated on single food service or                                                                           • Identify and describe the means
                                                                                                        2576; Email: Ashley.Chaifetz@
                                                Child Nutrition programs (e.g., NSLP,                                                                         through which self-operating SFAs
                                                                                                        fns.usda.gov.
                                                SBP, or the Summer Food Service                                                                               develop and publish solicitations,
                                                                                                        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            evaluate and award contracts, and
                                                Program [SFSP]) or studies that focused
                                                                                                          Title: Study of School Food Authority               monitor procurement contracts for all
                                                on single procurement practices (e.g.,
                                                                                                        (SFA) Procurement Practices (SFA                      school food purchases.
                                                use of Food Service Management
                                                Companies [FSMCs]) at the SFA level.
                                                                                                        Procurement Practices Study).                            • Identify and describe the rationale,
                                                                                                          Form Number: N/A.                                   procedures, and recordkeeping practices
                                                   This collection includes a mixed-                      OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
                                                methods approach of qualitative and                                                                           used by SFAs with respect to their
                                                                                                          Expiration Date: Not yet determined.                contracts with FSMCs.
                                                quantitative information utilizing a                      Type of Request: New collection.                       • Identify and describe the forms of
                                                structured web-based survey, as well as                   Abstract: The SFA Procurement                       cooperative purchasing arrangements
                                                in-depth interviews (IDIs) to be                        Practices Study will describe and                     SFAs use to purchase food products and
                                                conducted by telephone. Data will be                    evaluate the decision-making processes                services.
                                                collected from a subsample of the SFA                   of SFAs regarding school food                            • Assess the strengths and
                                                population participating in the second                  procurement practices. Using a                        weaknesses of SFAs with respect to
                                                year of the Child Nutrition Program                     nationally representative sample of                   procurement-related expertise in
                                                Operations Study-II (CN–OPS II) (OMB                    SFAs, this study will be one of the first             developing solicitation and contract
                                                Number 0584–0607).                                      FNS studies of SFA procurement                        documents, evaluating bids/responses,
                                                DATES: Written comments must be                         practices for school meal programs to                 negotiating terms and conditions, and
                                                received on or before July 31, 2017.                    comprehensively examine food service                  assessing the availability of State
                                                ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on (a)                  management companies, group                           agency-provided technical assistance
                                                whether the proposed collection of                      purchasing agreements, recordkeeping,                 and training resources.
                                                information is necessary for the proper                 local food purchases, and food purchase                  The SFA Procurement Practices Study
                                                performance of the functions of the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                        specifications.                                       will assist FNS to better understand
                                                agency, including whether the                             The Richard B. Russell National                     SFA procurement practices by
                                                information shall have practical utility;               School Lunch Act and Child Nutrition                  identifying the ways SFAs make
                                                (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate               Act provide the legislative authority for             decisions about procuring goods and
                                                of the burden of the proposed collection                the NSLP and the SBP. FNS administers                 services and the outcomes of such
                                                of information, including the validity of               the NSLP and the SBP at the Federal                   decisions.
                                                the methodology and assumptions that                    level, in addition to other meal                         The activities to be undertaken
                                                were used; (c) ways to enhance the                      programs at schools, including the                    subject to this notice include (1)


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:59 May 26, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00009   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM   30MYN1



Document Created: 2018-11-08 08:54:46
Document Modified: 2018-11-08 08:54:46
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice and request for comments.
DatesWritten comments must be received on or before July 31, 2017.
ContactTo request more information on the proposed project, or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans contact Kameron Burt, Social Science Policy Analyst, Office of Policy Support, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, VA 22302; Fax: 703-305-2576; Email: [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 24664 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR