82 FR 25521 - Special Local Regulation; Motor City Mile; Detroit River; Detroit, MI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 105 (June 2, 2017)

Page Range		25521-25523
FR Document		2017-11465
The Coast Guard is establishing a special local regulation for certain waters of the Detroit River, Detroit, MI. This action is necessary and is intended to ensure safety of life on navigable waters to be used for a swimming event immediately prior to, during, and immediately after this event. This regulation requires vessels to maintain a minimum speed for safe navigation and maneuvering.
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 105 (Friday, June 2, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 105 (Friday, June 2, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25521-25523]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11465]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0372]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation; Motor City Mile; Detroit River; 
Detroit, MI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a special local regulation for 
certain waters of the Detroit River, Detroit, MI. This action is 
necessary and is intended to ensure safety of life on navigable waters 
to be used for a swimming event immediately prior to, during, and 
immediately after this event. This regulation requires vessels to 
maintain a minimum speed for safe navigation and maneuvering.

DATES: This temporary final rule is effective from 7 a.m. until 12 p.m. 
on July 6, 2017.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0372 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
temporary rule, call or email Tracy Girard, Prevention Department, 
Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone 313-568-9564, or email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
COTP Captain of the Port
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable. The 
Coast Guard did not receive the final details of this swimming event 
until there was insufficient time remaining before the event to publish 
an NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date of this rule to wait for a 
comment period to run would be impracticable because it would inhibit 
the Coast Guard's ability to protect participants, mariners and vessels 
from the hazards associated with this event.
    We are issuing this rule under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), as the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register for the same reason 
noted above.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1233. The COTP has determined that the likely combination of recreation 
vessels, commercial vessels, and an unknown number of spectators in 
close proximity to a youth swimming event along the water pose extra 
and unusual hazards to public safety and property. Therefore, the COTP 
is establishing a Special Local Regulation around the event location to 
help minimize risks to safety of life and property during this event.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary special local regulation from 7 
a.m. until 12 p.m. on July 6, 2017. In light of the aforementioned 
hazards, the COTP has determined that a special local regulation is 
necessary to protect spectators, vessels, and participants. The special 
local regulation will encompass the following waterway: All waters of 
the Detroit River, Belle Isle Beach between the following two lines: 
The first line is drawn directly across the channel from position 
42[deg]20.517' N., 082[deg]59.159' W. to 42[deg]20.705' N., 
082[deg]59.233' W. (NAD 83); the second line, to the north, is drawn 
directly across the channel from position 42[deg]20.754' N., 
082[deg]58.681' W. to 42[deg] 20.997' N., 082[deg]58.846'' W. (NAD 83).
    An on-scene representative of the COTP or event sponsor 
representatives may permit vessels to transit the area when no race 
activity is occurring. The on-scene representative may be present on 
any Coast Guard, state, or local law enforcement vessel assigned to 
patrol the event. Vessel operators desiring to transit through the 
regulated area must contact the Coast Guard Patrol Commander to obtain 
permission to do so. The COTP or his designated on-scene representative 
may be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at 313-568-9560.
    The COTP or his designated on-scene representative will notify the 
public of the enforcement of this rule by all appropriate means, 
including a Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes and executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') and 
13563 (``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'') direct agencies 
to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives 
and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory

[[Page 25522]]

approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, 
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, 
and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing 
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs''), directs agencies to 
reduce regulation and control regulatory costs and provides that ``for 
every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be 
identified for elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be 
prudently managed and controlled through a budgeting process.''
    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this 
rule a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive 
Order 12866. Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
not reviewed it. As this rule is not a significant regulatory action, 
this rule is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See 
OMB's Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of 
the Executive Order of January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing Regulation and 
Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-year of the special local regulation. 
Vessel traffic will be able to safely transit around this special local 
regulation zone which will impact a small designated area of 7 a.m. to 
12 p.m. July 6, 2017. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast 
Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the special local 
regulation and the rule allows vessels to seek permission to enter the 
area.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
special local regulation may be small entities, for the reasons stated 
in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in 
this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a special local regulation lasting nine hours that will 
limit entry to a designated area. It is categorically excluded under 
section 2.B.2, figure 2-1, and paragraph 34(h) of the Instruction. A 
Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) is available in the docket 
where indicated in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0372 to read as follows:

[[Page 25523]]

Sec.  165.T09-0372  Special local regulation; Motor City Mile; Detroit 
River; Detroit, MI.

    (a) Location. A regulated area is established to encompass the 
following waterway: All waters of the Detroit River, Belle Isle Beach 
between the following two lines: The first line is drawn directly 
across the channel from position 42[deg]20.517' N., 082[deg]59.159' W. 
to 42[deg]20.705' N., 082[deg]59.233' W. (NAD 83); the second line, to 
the north, is drawn directly across the channel from position 
42[deg]20.754' N., 082[deg]58.681' W. to 42[deg]20.997' N., 
082[deg]58.846'' W. (NAD 83).
    (b) Enforcement period. This section is effective and will be 
enforced from 7 a.m. until 12 p.m. on July 6, 2017.
    (c) Regulations.
    (1) Vessels transiting through the regulated area are to maintain 
the minimum speeds for safe navigation.
    (2) Vessel operators desiring to operate in the regulated area must 
contact the Coast Guard Patrol Commander to obtain permission to do so. 
The Captain of the Port Detroit (COTP) or his on-scene representative 
may be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at 313-568-9560. Vessel 
operators given permission to operate within the regulated area must 
comply with all directions given to them by the COTP or his on-scene 
representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the COTP Detroit is any 
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer or a Federal, State, 
or local law enforcement officer designated by or assisting the Captain 
of the Port Detroit to act on his behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators shall contact the COTP Detroit or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to enter or operate within the 
special local regulation. The COTP Detroit or his on-scene 
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at 313-568-9464. 
Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the regulated 
area must comply with all directions given to them by the COTP Detroit 
or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: May 26, 2017.
Scott B. Lemasters,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2017-11465 Filed 6-1-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
25522 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 105 / Friday, June 2, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

approaches that maximize net benefits significant economic impact on any FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
(including potential economic, vessel owner or operator. above.
environmental, public health and safety Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
effects, distributive impacts, and Business Regulatory Enforcement
equity). Executive Order 13563 Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
emphasizes the importance of we want to assist small entities in of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
quantifying both costs and benefits, of understanding this rule. If the rule Federal agencies to assess the effects of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, would affect your small business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
and of promoting flexibility. Executive organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions
Order 13771 (‘‘Reducing Regulation and jurisdiction and you have questions that may result in the expenditure by a
Controlling Regulatory Costs’’), directs concerning its provisions or options for State, local, or tribal government, in the
agencies to reduce regulation and compliance, please contact the person aggregate, or by the private sector of
control regulatory costs and provides listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
that ‘‘for every one new regulation CONTACT section.
more in any one year. Though this rule
issued, at least two prior regulations be will not result in such expenditure, we
Small businesses may send comments
identified for elimination, and that the do discuss the effects of this rule
on the actions of Federal employees
cost of planned regulations be prudently elsewhere in this preamble.
who enforce, or otherwise determine
managed and controlled through a compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment
budgeting process.’’ the Small Business and Agriculture
The Office of Management and Budget We have analyzed this rule under
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security
(OMB) has not designated this rule a and the Regional Small Business
significant regulatory action under Management Directive 023–01 and
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Ombudsman evaluates these actions
Accordingly, the Office of Management which guide the Coast Guard in
annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National
and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed it.
responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
As this rule is not a significant
wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
regulatory action, this rule is exempt
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that this action is one of a
from the requirements of Executive
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
Coast Guard will not retaliate against individually or cumulatively have a
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human
Section 2 of the Executive Order of
about this rule or any policy or action environment. This rule involves a
January 30, 2017 titled ‘Reducing
of the Coast Guard. special local regulation lasting nine
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017). C. Collection of Information hours that will limit entry to a
This regulatory action determination designated area. It is categorically
is based on the size, location, duration, This rule will not call for a new excluded under section 2.B.2, figure 2–
and time-of-year of the special local collection of information under the 1, and paragraph 34(h) of the
regulation. Vessel traffic will be able to Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Instruction. A Record of Environmental
safely transit around this special local U.S.C. 3501–3520). Consideration (REC) is available in the
regulation zone which will impact a D. Federalism and Indian Tribal docket where indicated in the
small designated area of 7 a.m. to 12 Governments ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
p.m. July 6, 2017. Moreover, the Coast G. Protest Activities
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to A rule has implications for federalism
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel under Executive Order 13132, The Coast Guard respects the First
16 about the special local regulation and Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Amendment rights of protesters.
the rule allows vessels to seek effect on the States, on the relationship Protesters are asked to contact the
permission to enter the area. between the national government and person listed in the FOR FURTHER
the States, or on the distribution of INFORMATION CONTACT section to
B. Impact on Small Entities power and responsibilities among the coordinate protest activities so that your
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of various levels of government. We have message can be received without
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, analyzed this rule under that Order and jeopardizing the safety or security of
requires Federal agencies to consider have determined that it is consistent people, places or vessels.
the potential impact of regulations on with the fundamental federalism
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
small entities during rulemaking. The principles and preemption requirements
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small described in Executive Order 13132. Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
businesses, not-for-profit organizations Also, this rule does not have tribal (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
that are independently owned and implications under Executive Order requirements, Waterways.
operated and are not dominant in their 13175, Consultation and Coordination For the reasons discussed in the
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with Indian Tribal Governments, preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
with populations of less than 50,000. because it does not have a substantial CFR part 100 as follows:
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. direct effect on one or more Indian
605(b) that this rule will not have a tribes, on the relationship between the PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
Federal Government and Indian tribes, AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES

significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. or on the distribution of power and ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
While some owners or operators of responsibilities between the Federal continues to read as follows:
vessels intending to transit the special Government and Indian tribes. If you
local regulation may be small entities, believe this rule has implications for Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
for the reasons stated in section V.A federalism or Indian tribes, please ■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0372 to read as
above, this rule will not have a contact the person listed in the FOR follows:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:07 Jun 01, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM 02JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 105 / Friday, June 2, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 25523

§ 165.T09–0372 Special local regulation; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION requests that if at all possible, you
Motor City Mile; Detroit River; Detroit, MI. AGENCY contact the person listed in the FOR
(a) Location. A regulated area is FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 schedule your inspection. The Regional
established to encompass the following
waterway: All waters of the Detroit [EPA–R04–OAR–2016–0583; FRL–9962–27– Office’s official hours of business are
Region 4] Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to
River, Belle Isle Beach between the
4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays.
following two lines: The first line is
Air Plan Approval; Air Plan Approval FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane
drawn directly across the channel from and Air Quality Designation; GA; Spann, Air Regulatory Management
position 42°20.517′ N., 082°59.159′ W. Redesignation of the Atlanta, Georgia Section, Air Planning and
to 42°20.705′ N., 082°59.233′ W. (NAD 2008 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Implementation Branch, Pesticides and
83); the second line, to the north, is Area to Attainment Toxics Management Division, Region 4,
drawn directly across the channel from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
position 42°20.754′ N., 082°58.681′ W. AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency. 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
to 42°20.997′ N., 082°58.846″ W. (NAD 30303–8960. Ms. Spann can be reached
83). ACTION: Final rule.
by phone at (404) 562–9029 or via
(b) Enforcement period. This section SUMMARY: On July 18, 2016, the State of electronic mail at spann.jane@epa.gov.
is effective and will be enforced from 7 Georgia, through the Georgia SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
a.m. until 12 p.m. on July 6, 2017. Environmental Protection Division (GA
EPD) of the Department of Natural I. Background for Final Actions
(c) Regulations.
Resources, submitted a request for the Effective July 20, 2012, EPA
(1) Vessels transiting through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated areas as unclassifiable/
regulated area are to maintain the to redesignate the Atlanta, Georgia 2008 attainment or nonattainment for the
minimum speeds for safe navigation. 8-hour ozone nonattainment area 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS that was
(2) Vessel operators desiring to (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Atlanta promulgated on March 27, 2008. See 77
operate in the regulated area must Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’) to attainment for the FR 30088 (May 21, 2012). The Atlanta
contact the Coast Guard Patrol 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Area was designated as nonattainment
Commander to obtain permission to do Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and to for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS and
so. The Captain of the Port Detroit approve a State Implementation Plan classified as a marginal nonattainment
(COTP) or his on-scene representative (SIP) revision containing a maintenance area.1 On July 14, 2016, EPA issued a
plan for the Area. EPA is approving the determination that the Area had
may be contacted via VHF Channel 16
State’s maintenance plan, including the attained the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
or at 313–568–9560. Vessel operators
motor vehicle emission budgets (81 FR 45419). On July 18, 2016, Georgia
given permission to operate within the (MVEBs) for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and requested that EPA redesignate the
regulated area must comply with all volatile organic compounds (VOC) for Atlanta Area to attainment for the 2008
directions given to them by the COTP or the years 2014 and 2030 for the Area, 8-hour ozone NAAQS and submitted a
his on-scene representative. and redesignating the Area to SIP revision containing the State’s plan
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of attainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone for maintaining attainment of the 2008
the COTP Detroit is any Coast Guard NAAQS. Additionally, EPA finds the 8-hour ozone standard in the Area,
commissioned, warrant or petty officer 2014 and 2030 MVEBs for the Atlanta including 2014 and 2030 MVEBs for
or a Federal, State, or local law Area adequate for the purposes of NOX and VOC for the Atlanta Area. In
enforcement officer designated by or transportation conformity. a notice of proposed rulemaking
assisting the Captain of the Port Detroit DATES: This rule will be effective June (NPRM) published on December 23,
to act on his behalf. 2, 2017. 2016 (81 FR 94283), EPA proposed to
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a approve the maintenance plan,
(4) Vessel operators shall contact the including the 2014 and 2030 MVEBs for
COTP Detroit or his on-scene docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– NOX and VOC, and incorporate the plan
representative to obtain permission to into the Georgia SIP and to redesignate
2016–0583. All documents in the docket
enter or operate within the special local the Area to attainment for the 2008 8-
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
regulation. The COTP Detroit or his on- Web site. Although listed in the index, hour ozone NAAQS. In that notice, EPA
scene representative may be contacted some information may not be publicly also notified the public of the status of
via VHF Channel 16 or at 313–568– available, i.e., Confidential Business the Agency’s adequacy determination
9464. Vessel operators given permission Information or other information whose for the NOX and VOC MVEBs for the
to enter or operate in the regulated area disclosure is restricted by statute. Atlanta Area. The details of Georgia’s
must comply with all directions given to Certain other material, such as submittal and the rationale for EPA’s
them by the COTP Detroit or his on- copyrighted material, is not placed on actions are further explained in the
scene representative. the Internet and will be publicly NPRM.
Dated: May 26, 2017. available only in hard copy form. II. Response to Comments
Scott B. Lemasters,
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through EPA received one set of comments on
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at its December 23, 2016, proposed
the Port Detroit. rulemaking actions. Specifically, EPA
the Air Regulatory Management Section,
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES

[FR Doc. 2017–11465 Filed 6–1–17; 8:45 am]
Air Planning and Implementation received adverse comments from the
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Sierra Club (‘‘Commenter’’). These
Management Division, U.S. 1 The Atlanta Area consists of Bartow, Cherokee,
Environmental Protection Agency, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Newton,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA Paulding and Rockdale Counties in Georgia.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:07 Jun 01, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM 02JNR1
Document Created: 2017-06-02 00:37:59
Document Modified: 2017-06-02 00:37:59
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This temporary final rule is effective from 7 a.m. until 12 p.m. on July 6, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions on this temporary rule, call or email Tracy Girard, Prevention Department, Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone 313-568-9564, or email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 25521
RIN Number		1625-AA08
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Waterways
82 FR 25521 - Special Local Regulation; Motor City Mile; Detroit River; Detroit, MI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 105 (June 2, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
