82 FR 25764 - Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests; Delta, Garfield, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Mesa, Montrose, Ouray, Saguache and San Miguel Counties; Colorado; Assessment Report of Ecological, Social and Economic Conditions, Trends and Sustainability for the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 106 (June 5, 2017)

Page Range25764-25765
FR Document2017-11482

The Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests (GMUG), located on the western slope of the Colorado Rockies, are initiating the forest planning process pursuant to the 2012 National Forest System Land Management Planning rule. This process will result in a revised and updated Natural Resource Land Management Plan, often referred to as the Forest Plan, which will guide all management activities on the GMUG for the next fifteen years. The current GMUG Forest Plan was completed in 1983, and was subsequently amended in 1991, 1993, 2005, 2007, and 2009. Previous efforts to revise the Forest Plan, including an eight-year effort involving extensive public participation and the development of comprehensive assessments, a need for change report, and a proposed plan were shelved due to the overturning of the 2008 planning rule. Now that the national 2012 Planning Rule has been established, the GMUG will reinitiate the plan revision process. The plan revision process encompasses three stages: Assessment, plan revision, and monitoring. This notice announces the initiation of the assessment phase, the first stage of the plan revision process, which involves assessing ecological, social and economic conditions and trends in the planning area and documenting the findings in an Assessment report. For the first phase, the GMUG has posted helpful resources, including the current Forest Plan and subsequent amendments, information from the 2006 and 2007 revision efforts, and the Citizen's Guide to National Forest Planning, on the GMUG Forest Plan Web site listed below. During this assessment phase, the GMUG invites other government agencies, non-governmental parties, and the public to share material about existing and changed conditions, trends, and perceptions of social, economic and ecological systems. The GMUG will host a variety of public outreach forums in summer and fall of 2017 to facilitate this effort, and the public is encouraged to participate and provide meaningful contributions. The GMUG is seeking local knowledge of social values, available data resources, areas of use and activities, goods and services produced by lands within the GMUG, and relevant material that will help inform desired conditions, standards and guidelines, land suitability determinations, and other plan components. This information will help identify gaps in the current management plan and inform the need for change, highlighting priority issues that should be addressed in this revision. Public participation and collaboration are essential steps to understanding current conditions, available data, and feedback needed to support a strategic, efficient and effective revision process. Several guiding principles, developed to overcome stakeholder- identified challenges, will drive public engagement throughout the plan revision process. These guiding principles include providing direct and transparent communication through a variety of methods, maintaining focused public involvement, building relationships, and promoting sharing, learning and understanding between the agency and the public. These guiding principles will help the GMUG ensure that public engagement in the current assessment phase and throughout the plan revision process will be functional, accessible, and representative.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 106 (Monday, June 5, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 106 (Monday, June 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25764-25765]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests; Delta, 
Garfield, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Mesa, Montrose, Ouray, Saguache and San 
Miguel Counties; Colorado; Assessment Report of Ecological, Social and 
Economic Conditions, Trends and Sustainability for the Grand Mesa, 
Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of initiating the assessment phase of the land 
management plan revision for the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison 
National Forests.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests 
(GMUG), located on the western slope of the Colorado Rockies, are 
initiating the forest planning process pursuant to the 2012 National 
Forest System Land Management Planning rule. This process will result 
in a revised and updated Natural Resource Land Management Plan, often 
referred to as the Forest Plan, which will guide all management 
activities on the GMUG for the next fifteen years. The current GMUG 
Forest Plan was completed in 1983, and was subsequently amended in 
1991, 1993, 2005, 2007, and 2009. Previous efforts to revise the Forest 
Plan, including an eight-year effort involving extensive public 
participation and the development of comprehensive assessments, a need 
for change report, and a proposed plan were shelved due to the 
overturning of the 2008 planning rule. Now that the national 2012 
Planning Rule has been established, the GMUG will reinitiate the plan 
revision process.
    The plan revision process encompasses three stages: Assessment, 
plan revision, and monitoring. This notice announces the initiation of 
the assessment phase, the first stage of the plan revision process, 
which involves assessing ecological, social and economic conditions and 
trends in the planning area and documenting the findings in an 
Assessment report. For the first phase, the GMUG has posted helpful 
resources, including the current Forest Plan and subsequent amendments, 
information from the 2006 and 2007 revision efforts, and the Citizen's 
Guide to National Forest Planning, on the GMUG Forest Plan Web site 
listed below.
    During this assessment phase, the GMUG invites other government 
agencies, non-governmental parties, and the public to share material 
about existing and changed conditions, trends, and perceptions of 
social, economic and ecological systems. The GMUG will host a variety 
of public outreach forums in summer and fall of 2017 to facilitate this 
effort, and the public is encouraged to participate and provide 
meaningful contributions. The GMUG is seeking local knowledge of social 
values, available data resources, areas of use and activities, goods 
and services produced by lands within the GMUG, and relevant material 
that will help inform desired conditions, standards and guidelines, 
land suitability determinations, and other plan components. This 
information will help identify gaps in the current management plan and 
inform the need for change, highlighting priority issues that should be 
addressed in this revision. Public participation and collaboration are 
essential steps to understanding current conditions, available data, 
and feedback needed to support a strategic, efficient and effective 
revision process.
    Several guiding principles, developed to overcome stakeholder-
identified challenges, will drive public engagement throughout the plan 
revision process. These guiding principles include providing direct and 
transparent communication through a variety of methods, maintaining 
focused public involvement, building relationships, and promoting 
sharing, learning and understanding between the agency and the public. 
These guiding principles will help the GMUG ensure

[[Page 25765]]

that public engagement in the current assessment phase and throughout 
the plan revision process will be functional, accessible, and 
representative.

DATES: In summer and fall of 2017, the public is invited to engage in 
the assessment phase of the revision process, for which public 
engagement opportunities will be posted on the GMUG Forest Plan Web 
site located at: www.fs.usda.gov/main/gmug/landmanagement/planning. 
Information will also be sent out to the Forests' mailing list. If 
anyone is interested in being included in these notifications, please 
send an email to [email protected]. The assessment report for 
the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison (GMUG) National Forests is 
expected to be completed by January 2018 and will be posted on the GMUG 
Forest Plan Web site listed above. The GMUG will then initiate 
procedures pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and 
prepare and evaluate a revised Forest Plan.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and 
Gunnison National Forests, Attn: Plan Revision, 2250 HWY 50, Delta CO, 
81416. Written comments may also be sent via email to 
[email protected], or via facsimile to 970-874-6698. All 
correspondence, including names and addresses when provided, will be 
placed in the record and will be available for public inspection and 
copying.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clay Speas, Acting Renewable Resources 
Planning Staff Officer, 970-874-6677, [email protected]. Individuals who 
use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 
p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Forest Management Act (NFMA) of 
1976 requires that every National Forest System (NFS) unit develop a 
land management plan, often called a Forest Plan. On April 9th, 2012, 
the Forest Service finalized its land management planning rule, 
referred to as the 2012 Planning Rule, which describes requirements for 
the planning process and provides programmatic direction to National 
Forests and National Grasslands for developing and implementing their 
forest plans. Forest plans describe the strategic direction for 
management of forest resources, and are adaptive and amendable as 
conditions change over time, in order to remain relevant for their 
intended application period of 10-15 years.
    Similar to the 2008 Planning Rule, the 2012 Planning Rule requires 
the forests to outline desired conditions for each management area, 
specify objectives to achieve those conditions, and engage the public 
extensively throughout the plan revision process. However, the 2012 
Planning Rule diverges from previous iterations in several guiding 
concepts and substantive components, particularly in relying on the 
concept of ecological integrity to frame plan assessment, develop plan 
components, and fulfill monitoring requirements. Based on current 
estimates, it is expected to take four years to produce a revised 
Forest Plan.
    Pursuant to the 2012 Planning Rule (CFR part 219), the revision 
process encompasses three stages: Assessment, plan revision and 
monitoring.
    Assessment--This notice announces the start of the first stage of 
the process, during which updated information from the public, other 
federal agencies, and non-governmental parties, as well as still 
applicable data from the previous revision effort will be compiled in 
an assessment report. Information relevant to the assessment report may 
include the current, changed, and changing status of ecological, social 
and economic conditions within the planning area and their 
interconnected relationships within the context of the broader 
landscape. The development of the assessment includes opportunities for 
the public to contribute information and engage in the planning process 
and build a common understanding prior to entering formal plan 
revision. Information gathered will be documented in assessment reports 
that form the basis for the need for change document, which identifies 
changes to be included in the new plan to provide management direction 
adaptable enough to address changing environmental, social and economic 
conditions.
    Plan Revision--Using the need for change as a foundation, the GMUG, 
in coordination with partners and the public, will then begin the plan 
revision phase of the process. During this phase, a vision statement 
will be developed that will lead the forests into the future, 
specifying desired conditions and objectives to help achieve these 
goals. In compliance with the NEPA, this phase will include the 
development of alternatives, a proposed action, an environmental impact 
statement (EIS), and eventually a revised Forest Plan, with announced 
opportunities for public review and comment. Once the Forest Plan is 
finalized, all projects and actions that will be implemented on the 
ground must be in compliance with the Forest Plan.
    Monitoring--As part of the plan revision, the public will assist 
the Forest Service in developing a monitoring program, which will be 
carried out after the revised plan is approved and will continue 
throughout the life of the plan. The monitoring program should be 
designed to help evaluate progress towards meeting the desired 
conditions and objectives established by the Forest Plan, and may 
include monitoring questions that address the status of watershed 
conditions, visitor use and satisfaction, effects of management 
activities, and more. Monitoring efforts should be within the financial 
and technical capability of the agency and will help the Forest Service 
and the public evaluate the effectiveness of the Forest Plan by 
providing feedback and helping determine whether a change in the plan 
is necessary.
    To identify as much relevant information as possible, the GMUG is 
encouraging contributors to share their concerns and perceptions of the 
conditions and trends in social, economic and environmental systems 
within the GMUG planning area. Meetings, review and comment periods, 
and other opportunities for public engagement throughout the plan 
revision process will be publicized, with announcements posted on the 
Forests' planning Web site at www.fs.usda.gov/main/gmug/landmanagement/planning. Information will also be sent out to the Forests' mailing 
list. If anyone is interested in being included in these notifications, 
please send an email to [email protected].

Responsible Official

    The responsible official for the revision of the land management 
plan for the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests is 
Scott Armentrout, Forest Supervisor, Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and 
Gunnison National Forests, 2250 HWY 50, Delta, CO 81416.

    Dated: April 13, 2017.
Glenn P. Casamassa,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2017-11482 Filed 6-2-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3411-15-P


Current View
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of initiating the assessment phase of the land management plan revision for the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests.
DatesIn summer and fall of 2017, the public is invited to engage in the assessment phase of the revision process, for which public engagement opportunities will be posted on the GMUG Forest Plan Web site located at: www.fs.usda.gov/main/gmug/landmanagement/planning. Information will also be sent out to the Forests' mailing list. If anyone is interested in being included in these notifications, please send an email to [email protected] The assessment report for the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison (GMUG) National Forests is expected to be completed by January 2018 and will be posted on the GMUG Forest Plan Web site listed above. The GMUG will then initiate procedures pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and prepare and evaluate a revised Forest Plan.
ContactClay Speas, Acting Renewable Resources Planning Staff Officer, 970-874-6677, [email protected] Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
FR Citation82 FR 25764 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR