82 FR 25783 - Request for Information (RFI): Review of Draft Version of DOE Energy-Water Nexus State Policy Database

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 106 (June 5, 2017)

Page Range		25783-25784
FR Document		2017-11547

The Department of Energy (DOE) gives notice of a Request for Information (RFI): ``Review of Draft Version of DOE Energy-Water Nexus State Policy Database.'' This RFI seeks review and feedback from stakeholders on the draft version of the DOE Energy-Water Nexus State Policy Database, including over 1,700 state-level water policies that affect energy systems. The database is being developed by DOE's Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (DOE-EPSA). The draft or ``beta'' version of the database is presented as a web tool at http:// energywaterpolicy.org. Categories of policies in the database include surface water rights; groundwater rights; water discharge regulations for power plant cooling water effluent, stormwater, and wastewater from oil and gas production; Underground Injection Control (UIC) program regulations; state water plans; regional watershed commissions; reservoir and river operations; and integrated energy and water policies. The goals of the database are to facilitate improved policy analysis, modeling, visualization, and communication by states, industry, utilities, academia, federal agencies, and other stakeholders.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 106 (Monday, June 5, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 106 (Monday, June 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25783-25784]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11547]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Request for Information (RFI): Review of Draft Version of DOE 
Energy-Water Nexus State Policy Database

AGENCY: Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (EPSA), Department 
of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of request for information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) gives notice of a Request for 
Information (RFI): ``Review of Draft Version of DOE Energy-Water Nexus 
State Policy Database.'' This RFI seeks review and feedback from 
stakeholders on the draft version of the DOE Energy-Water Nexus State 
Policy Database, including over 1,700 state-level water policies that 
affect energy systems. The database is being developed by DOE's Office 
of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (DOE-EPSA). The draft or ``beta'' 
version of the database is presented as a web tool at http://energywaterpolicy.org. Categories of policies in the database include 
surface water rights; groundwater rights; water discharge regulations 
for power plant cooling water effluent, stormwater, and wastewater from 
oil and gas production; Underground Injection Control (UIC) program 
regulations; state water plans; regional watershed commissions; 
reservoir and river operations; and integrated energy and water 
policies. The goals of the database are to facilitate improved policy 
analysis, modeling, visualization, and communication by states, 
industry, utilities, academia, federal agencies, and other 
stakeholders.

DATES: Written comments and information are requested on or before 
August 4, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments, which 
must be submitted electronically to [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information 
may be sent to Samuel Bockenhauer, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of 
Energy Policy and Systems Analysis, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20585. Email: [email protected]. Phone: 
(202) 586-9016.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Present-day energy and water systems are in many cases 
interconnected. Water is used in most phases of energy production and 
electricity generation. Energy is required to extract, convey, and 
deliver water of appropriate quality for diverse human uses, and then 
again to treat wastewaters prior to their return to the environment. 
Historically, energy and water systems have been developed, managed, 
and regulated independently and without significant acknowledgement of 
the connections between them. The energy and water policy landscape is 
thus highly fragmented, which can make it difficult for industry, 
utilities, government, and other stakeholder groups to effectively 
balance energy and water goals.
    Furthermore, much of the authority for water policy lies at the 
level of individual states. For example, allocation of water rights and 
permitting for water discharge are managed primarily at the state 
level. The particularly complex and fragmented nature of water policies 
affecting energy systems, as well as their variation across different 
states, suggests that a centralized, public database of water policies 
affecting energy systems could enable enhanced policy analysis, 
modeling, visualization, and communication by states, industry, 
utilities, academia, federal agencies, and other stakeholders.

Purpose

    The purpose of this RFI is to solicit feedback from industry, 
utilities, academia, research laboratories, government agencies, and 
other stakeholders on the draft version of the Energy-Water Nexus State 
Policy Database available at http://energywaterpolicy.org. Regarding 
the draft version of the Energy-Water Nexus State Policy Database, 
neither the United States Government nor any

[[Page 25784]]

agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their 
contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, 
express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility 
for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party's use or the results 
of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process 
disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately 
owned rights. Reference in the draft version of the Energy-Water Nexus 
State Policy Database to any specific commercial product, process, or 
service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not 
necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or 
favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its 
contractors or subcontractors. This RFI is solely an effort to gather 
information from stakeholders to help inform DOE-EPSA on whether a 
finalized version of such a database would be useful and how it might 
be designed.

Request for Information Categories and Questions

    DOE is particularly interested in receiving comments and data on 
the following:
    1. Quality and Completeness of Information. Are the policy 
descriptions accurate and complete? Are they current? Are the key 
functional pieces of the policy easily accessible? What additional 
information would be useful? How could the descriptions be streamlined? 
What other policies should be included?
    2. Functionality. How could the functionality be improved in areas 
such as user interface, search functionality, sorting functionality, 
site structure, etc.?
    3. Uses. How might you or your organization use the database? What 
key important questions could the database help to answer? What 
visualizations might you or your organization consider using the 
database to develop?
    4. Connection to Other Data Sources or Initiatives. Are there other 
data sources in industry, government, academia, or other sectors that 
could be connected to this database? If so, what are these data sets 
and how might they be beneficially connected or coordinated with the 
database?
    5. Users. Which stakeholder groups--including groups in industry, 
government, academia, etc.--might find the database most useful and for 
what purpose?
    6. Maintenance. How should policy developments be tracked and at 
what frequency to keep the database current and useful?

Request for Information Response Guidelines

    Responses to this RFI must be submitted electronically to 
[email protected] no later than 11:59 p.m. (ET) on August 4, 
2017. Responses must be provided as attachments to an email. It is 
recommended that attachments with file sizes exceeding 25MB be 
compressed (i.e., zipped) to ensure message delivery. Responses must be 
provided as a Microsoft Word (.docx) or Microsoft Excel (.xslx) 
attachment to the email. Only electronic responses will be accepted.
    Please identify your answers by responding to a specific question 
or topic if applicable. Respondents may answer as many or as few 
questions as they wish. DOE-EPSA will not respond to individual 
submissions or publish publicly a compendium of responses. A response 
to this RFI will not be viewed as a binding commitment to develop or 
pursue the project or ideas discussed.
    Respondents are requested to provide the following information at 
the start of their response to this RFI:
     Company/institution name;
     Company/institution contact;
     Contact's address, phone number, and email address.

Confidential Business Information

    Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any person submitting information that 
he or she believes to be confidential and exempt by law from public 
disclosure should submit via email two well-marked copies: One copy of 
the document marked ``confidential'' including all the information 
believed to be confidential, and one copy of the document marked ``non-
confidential'' with the information believed to be confidential 
deleted. DOE will make its own determination about the confidential 
status of the information and treat it according to its determination.
    Factors of interest to DOE when evaluating requests to treat 
submitted information as confidential include: (1) A description of the 
items; (2) whether and why such items are customarily treated as 
confidential within the industry; (3) whether the information is 
generally known by or available from other sources; (4) whether the 
information has previously been made available to others without 
obligation concerning its confidentiality; (5) an explanation of the 
competitive injury to the submitting person that would result from 
public disclosure; (6) when such information might lose its 
confidential character due to the passage of time; and (7) why 
disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 9, 2017.
Carol Battershell,
Acting Director, Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2017-11547 Filed 6-2-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 106 / Monday, June 5, 2017 / Notices 25783

By: lllllllllllllllllll Commission via: http://www.pay.gov. DATES: Written comments and
Hideto Yoshitake, Upon the failure of Kawasaki to make information are requested on or before
the foregoing payment when due,
General Manager and Associate Officer. August 4, 2017.
KAWASAKI MOTORS CORP., U.S.A. interest on the unpaid amount shall ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
Dated: May 12, 2017 accrue and be paid by Kawasaki at the encouraged to submit comments, which
By: lllllllllllllllllll
federal legal rate of interest set forth at must be submitted electronically to
28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) and (b). If Kawasaki EPSA.Database@hq.doe.gov.
Yoshitaka Tamura,
fails to make such payment or to comply FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
President and Chief Executive Officer.
in full with any other provision of the Requests for additional information may
KAWASAKI MOTORS MANUFACTURING Settlement Agreement, such conduct be sent to Samuel Bockenhauer, U.S.
CORP., U.S.A. will be considered a violation of the Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Dated: May 12, 2017 Settlement Agreement and Order. Policy and Systems Analysis, 1000
By: lllllllllllllllllll Provisionally accepted and Independence Avenue SW.,
Masanobu Kurushima, provisional Order issued on the 31st day Washington, DC 20585. Email:
President. of May, 2017. samuel.bockenhauer@hq.doe.gov.
Dated: May 16, 2017 By Order of the Commission: Phone: (202) 586–9016.
By: lllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllll SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Michael A. Wiegard, Esq., Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary,
Background
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Counsel to Kawasaki. Commission. Present-day energy and water systems
U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY [FR Doc. 2017–11567 Filed 6–2–17; 8:45 am]
are in many cases interconnected. Water
COMMISSION is used in most phases of energy
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
Mary T. Boyle,
production and electricity generation.
Energy is required to extract, convey,
General Counsel.
and deliver water of appropriate quality
Mary B. Murphy, for diverse human uses, and then again
Assistant General Counsel. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
to treat wastewaters prior to their return
Dated: May 22, 2017 to the environment. Historically, energy
Request for Information (RFI): Review
By: lllllllllllllllllll and water systems have been developed,
of Draft Version of DOE Energy-Water
Philip Z. Brown, Nexus State Policy Database managed, and regulated independently
Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance, and without significant
Office of the General Counsel AGENCY: Office of Energy Policy and acknowledgement of the connections
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Systems Analysis (EPSA), Department between them. The energy and water
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY of Energy (DOE). policy landscape is thus highly
COMMISSION ACTION: Notice of request for fragmented, which can make it difficult
In the Matter of: KAWASAKI HEAVY information. for industry, utilities, government, and
INDUSTRIES, LTD.; KAWASAKI MOTORS other stakeholder groups to effectively
CORP., U.S.A.; and KAWASAKI MOTORS SUMMARY: The Department of Energy balance energy and water goals.
MANUFACTURING CORP., U.S.A. (DOE) gives notice of a Request for Furthermore, much of the authority
CPSC Docket No.: 17–C0004 Information (RFI): ‘‘Review of Draft for water policy lies at the level of
Version of DOE Energy-Water Nexus individual states. For example,
ORDER State Policy Database.’’ This RFI seeks allocation of water rights and permitting
Upon consideration of the Settlement review and feedback from stakeholders for water discharge are managed
Agreement entered into between on the draft version of the DOE Energy- primarily at the state level. The
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd., Water Nexus State Policy Database, particularly complex and fragmented
Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A., and including over 1,700 state-level water nature of water policies affecting energy
Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp., policies that affect energy systems. The systems, as well as their variation across
U.S.A. (collectively, ‘‘Kawasaki’’), and database is being developed by DOE’s different states, suggests that a
the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Office of Energy Policy and Systems centralized, public database of water
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), and the Analysis (DOE–EPSA). The draft or policies affecting energy systems could
Commission having jurisdiction over ‘‘beta’’ version of the database is enable enhanced policy analysis,
the subject matter and over Kawasaki, presented as a web tool at http:// modeling, visualization, and
and it appearing that the Settlement energywaterpolicy.org. Categories of communication by states, industry,
Agreement and the Order are in the policies in the database include surface utilities, academia, federal agencies, and
public interest, it is: water rights; groundwater rights; water other stakeholders.
ORDERED that the Settlement discharge regulations for power plant
Agreement be, and is, hereby, accepted; cooling water effluent, stormwater, and Purpose
and it is wastewater from oil and gas production; The purpose of this RFI is to solicit
FURTHER ORDERED that Kawasaki Underground Injection Control (UIC) feedback from industry, utilities,
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES

shall comply with the terms of the program regulations; state water plans; academia, research laboratories,
Settlement Agreement and shall pay a regional watershed commissions; government agencies, and other
civil penalty in the amount of five reservoir and river operations; and stakeholders on the draft version of the
million, two hundred thousand dollars integrated energy and water policies. Energy-Water Nexus State Policy
($5,200,000) within thirty (30) days after The goals of the database are to facilitate Database available at http://
service of the Commission’s final Order improved policy analysis, modeling, energywaterpolicy.org. Regarding the
accepting the Settlement Agreement. visualization, and communication by draft version of the Energy-Water Nexus
The payment shall be made by states, industry, utilities, academia, State Policy Database, neither the
electronic wire transfer to the federal agencies, and other stakeholders. United States Government nor any

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:31 Jun 02, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM 05JNN1

Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:00:24
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:00:24

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice of request for information.
Dates		Written comments and information are requested on or before August 4, 2017.
Contact		Requests for additional information may be sent to Samuel Bockenhauer, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585. Email: [email protected] Phone: (202) 586-9016.
FR Citation		82 FR 25783