82 FR 26044 - Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 107 (June 6, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 107 (June 6, 2017)
| Page Range | 26044-26046 | |
| FR Document | 2017-11667 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 6, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 26044-26046] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-11667] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-489-815] Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on light-walled rectuangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) from Turkey. The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. This administrative review covers nine exporters of the subject merchandise, including two mandatory respondents, Cinar Boru Profil Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (CINAR) and Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi A.S. (Noksel). The Department preliminarily determines that CINAR and Noksel made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective June 6, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Hill or Patrick O'Connor, AD/ CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3518 or (202) 482-0989, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the antidumping order is certain welded carbon quality light-walled steel pipe and tube, of rectangular (including square) cross section, having a wall thickness of less than 4 millimeters from Turkey. The merchandise subject to the order is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheadings 7306.61.50.00 and 7306.61.70.60. For a full description of the scope of the order, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance ``Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey: Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby incorporated by reference (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\2\ Further, a list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memoradum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review The Department preliminarily determines that weighted-average dumping margins exist for the respondents for the period May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016, as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- Manufacturer/exporter average margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cinar Boru Profil Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S................. 4.00 Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi A.S............................ 5.05 [[Page 26045]] Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S................... 4.87 Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S.............................. 4.87 Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S................................. 4.87 Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S..................... 4.87 Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama A.S.............. 4.87 Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S..................... 4.87 Agir Haddecilik A.S..................................... 4.87 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ For the rate for non-selected respondents in an administrative review, generally, the Department looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted- average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .'' With two respondents, we normally calculate (A) a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents; (B) a simple average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents; and (C) a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents using each company's publicly-ranged values for the merchandise under consideration. We compare (B) and (C) to (A) and select the rate closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for all other companies.\3\ Accordingly, we have applied a rate of 4.87 percent to the non-selected companies, as set forth in the chart above.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). \4\ See Memorandum from Jonathan Hill, International Trade Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance to the File, ``Calculation of the Rate for Non-Selected Respondents,'' dated May 31, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review. For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\5\ For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company involved in the transaction.\6\ We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer- specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation methodology adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). \6\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of LWRPT from Turkey entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies under review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be required); (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair- value investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of the proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 27.04 percent ad valorem, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.\7\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey, 73 FR 19814 (April 11, 2008). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose the calculations used in our analysis to interested parties in this review within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results of this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\8\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each brief: (1) A statement of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of authorities.\9\ Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes.\10\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \10\ Id. \11\ See 19 CFR 351.303. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of the publication of this notice in the Federal Register. If a hearing is requested, the Department will notify interested parties of the hearing schedule. Interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests [[Page 26046]] should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. We intend to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of issues raised by the parties in the written comments, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, unless otherwise extended.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. These preliminary results of administrative review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). Dated: May 31, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Selection of Respondents V. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments VI. Affiliation VII. Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination VIII. Allegation of Duty Evasion IX. Use of Partial Adverse Facts Available X. Discussion of the Methodology a. Comparison to Normal Value i. Determination of a Comaparison Methodology ii. Results of Differential Pricing b. Product Comparisons c. Date of Sale d. Export Price e. Duty Drawback f. Normal Value i. Home Market Viability ii. Affiliated-Party Transactions and Arm's Length Test iii. Level of Trade g. Cost of Production Analysis i. Calculation of Cost of Production ii. Test of Comparison Market Prices iii. Results of Cost of Production Test h. Calculation of a Normal Value on Comparison-Market Prices i. Currency Conversion XI. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2017-11667 Filed 6-5-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![26044 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
increased imports into the United States firms contributed importantly to the decrease in sales or production of each
of articles like or directly competitive total or partial separation of the firm’s petitioning firm.
with those produced by each of these workers, or threat thereof, and to a
LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT
ASSISTANCE
[5/17/2017 through 5/25/2017]
Date accepted
Firm name Firm address for Product(s)
investigation
Mursix Corporation ......................... 2401 North Executive Park Drive, 5/18/2017 The firm manufactures stamped metal parts for the
Yorktown, IN 47396. automotive industry.
Summit Corporation of America ..... 1430 Waterbury Road, Thomaston, 5/24/2017 The firm is a complete electroplating production fa-
CT 6787. cility that operates over 25 plating lines for contin-
uous strip and wire, as well as individual parts
plating by rack or barrel.
Any party having a substantial ve Ticaret A.S. (CINAR) and Noksel amended (the Act). Export price and
interest in these proceedings may Celik Boru Sanayi A.S. (Noksel). The constructed export price are calculated
request a public hearing on the matter. Department preliminarily determines in accordance with section 772 of the
A written request for a hearing must be that CINAR and Noksel made sales of Act. Normal value is calculated in
submitted to the Trade Adjustment subject merchandise at less than normal accordance with section 773 of the Act.
Assistance for Firms Division, Room value during the POR. Interested parties For a full description of the
71030, Economic Development are invited to comment on these methodology underlying our
Administration, U.S. Department of preliminary results. conclusions, see the Preliminary
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no DATES: Effective June 6, 2017. Decision Memorandum.2 Further, a list
later than ten (10) calendar days FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: of the topics discussed in the
following publication of this notice. Jonathan Hill or Patrick O’Connor, AD/ Preliminary Decision Memoradum is
Please follow the requirements set CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement attached as an appendix to this notice.
forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR and Compliance, International Trade The Preliminary Decision Memorandum
315.9 for procedures to request a public Administration, U.S. Department of is a public document and is on file
hearing. The Catalog of Federal Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue electronically via Enforcement and
Domestic Assistance official number NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: Compliance’s Antidumping and
and title for the program under which (202) 482–3518 or (202) 482–0989, Countervailing Duty Centralized
these petitions are submitted is 11.313, respectively. Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. ACCESS is available to registered users
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Miriam Kearse, at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and is
Scope of the Order available to all parties in the Central
Lead Program Analyst.
The merchandise covered by the Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
[FR Doc. 2017–11631 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am]
antidumping order is certain welded Department of Commerce building. In
BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P
carbon quality light-walled steel pipe addition, a complete version of the
and tube, of rectangular (including Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE square) cross section, having a wall be accessed directly at http://
thickness of less than 4 millimeters from enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
International Trade Administration Turkey. The merchandise subject to the Preliminary Decision Memorandum and
order is classified in the Harmonized the electronic versions of the
[A–489–815] Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
Tariff Schedule of the United States at
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and subheadings 7306.61.50.00 and identical in content.
Tube From Turkey: Preliminary Results 7306.61.70.60. For a full description of Preliminary Results of Review
of Antidumping Duty Administrative the scope of the order, see Preliminary
Review; 2015–2016 Decision Memorandum.1 The Department preliminarily
determines that weighted-average
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Methodology dumping margins exist for the
International Trade Administration, The Department is conducting this respondents for the period May 1, 2015,
Commerce. review in accordance with section through April 30, 2016, as follows:
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
(the Department) is conducting an Weighted-
administrative review of the 1 See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Deputy average
Manufacturer/exporter
antidumping duty order on light-walled Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and margin
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Countervailing Duty Operations to Ronald K. (percent)
rectuangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
from Turkey. The period of review Enforcement and Compliance ‘‘Light-Walled Cinar Boru Profil Sanayi ve
(POR) is May 1, 2015, through April 30, Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey: Decision Ticaret A.S ........................ 4.00
2016. This administrative review covers Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015– A.S .................................... 5.05
nine exporters of the subject 2016,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
merchandise, including two mandatory incorporated by reference (Preliminary Decision
respondents, Cinar Boru Profil Sanayi Memorandum). 2 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:52 Jun 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_26151/page/1.svg)
![26046 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
should contain: (1) The party’s name, i. Calculation of Cost of Production Japan.2 On May 11, 2016, respondent
address, and telephone number; (2) the ii. Test of Comparison Market Prices Toyo Kohan requested that the
number of participants; and (3) a list of iii. Results of Cost of Production Test Department conduct an administrative
h. Calculation of a Normal Value on
the issues to be discussed. Issues raised review of its sale and shipments to the
Comparison-Market Prices
in the hearing will be limited to those i. Currency Conversion United States during the POR.3 On May
raised in the respective case and XI. Conclusion 31, 2016, the petitioner, Thomas Steel
rebuttal briefs. Strip Corporation (Thomas Steel),
[FR Doc. 2017–11667 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am]
We intend to issue the final results of requested that the Department conduct
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
this administrative review, including administrative reviews of Toyo Kohan
the results of our analysis of issues and NSSMC.4 On July 7, 2016, in
raised by the parties in the written response to these timely requests, and in
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
comments, within 120 days of accordance with section 751(a) of the
publication of these preliminary results International Trade Administration Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
in the Federal Register, unless and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), the
otherwise extended.12 [A–588–869] Department initiated an administrative
Notification to Importers review of the antidumping duty order
Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat- on certain nickel-plated, flat-rolled steel
This notice also serves as a Rolled Steel Products From Japan: from Japan with respect to both Toyo
preliminary reminder to importers of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Kohan and NSSMC.5
their responsibility under 19 CFR Duty Administrative Review,
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding Preliminary Determination of No Scope of the Order
the reimbursement of antidumping Shipments; 2015–2016 The diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated
duties prior to liquidation of the
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, flat-rolled steel products included in
relevant entries during this review
International Trade Administration, this order are flat-rolled, cold-reduced
period. Failure to comply with this
Department of Commerce. steel products, regardless of chemistry;
requirement could result in the
whether or not in coils; either plated or
Department’s presumption that SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
coated with nickel or nickel-based
reimbursement of antidumping duties (the Department) is conducting an
alloys and subsequently annealed (i.e.,
occurred and the subsequent assessment administrative review of the
‘‘diffusion-annealed’’); whether or not
of double antidumping duties. antidumping duty order on diffusion-
These preliminary results of painted, varnished or coated with
annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel
administrative review are issued and plastics or other metallic or nonmetallic
products (certain nickel-plated, flat-
published in accordance with sections substances; and less than or equal to 2.0
rolled steel) from Japan.1 The period of
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 mm in nominal thickness. For purposes
review (POR) is May 1, 2015, through
CFR 351.213(h)(1). of this order, ‘‘nickel-based alloys’’
April 30, 2016. The review covers two
include all nickel alloys with other
Dated: May 31, 2017. producers/exporters of the subject
metals in which nickel accounts for at
Ronald K. Lorentzen, merchandise, Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd.
least 80 percent of the alloy by volume.
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement (Toyo Kohan) and Nippon Steel &
Sumitomo Metals Corporation Imports of merchandise included in
and Compliance.
(NSSMC). We preliminarily determine the scope of this order are classified
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in that sales of subject merchandise by primarily under Harmonized Tariff
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Toyo Kohan were made at less than Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
I. Summary normal value during the POR. We also subheadings 7212.50.0000 and
II. Background preliminarily determine that NSSMC 7210.90.6000, but may also be classified
III. Scope of the Order did not have reviewable entries during under HTSUS subheadings
IV. Selection of Respondents the POR. Interested parties are invited to 7210.70.6090, 7212.40.1000,
V. Preliminary Determination of No comment on these preliminary results. 7212.40.5000, 7219.90.0020,
Shipments 7219.90.0025, 7219.90.0060,
VI. Affiliation DATES: Effective June 6, 2017.
7219.90.0080, 7220.90.0010,
VII. Respondents Not Selected for Individual FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
7220.90.0015, 7225.99.0090, or
Examination Brian Davis, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7226.99.0180. The foregoing HTSUS
VIII. Allegation of Duty Evasion VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
IX. Use of Partial Adverse Facts Available subheadings are provided only for
International Trade Administration, convenience and customs purposes. The
X. Discussion of the Methodology U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
a. Comparison to Normal Value written description of the scope of this
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, order is dispositive.
i. Determination of a Comaparison
Methodology DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7924,
ii. Results of Differential Pricing respectively. 2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
b. Product Comparisons SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
c. Date of Sale to Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 26206
d. Export Price Background (May 2, 2016).
e. Duty Drawback 3 See Letter from Toyo Kohan to the Department
f. Normal Value
On May 2, 2016, the Department regarding ‘‘Toyo Kohan’s Request for Antidumping
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
i. Home Market Viability published a notice of opportunity to Administrative Review, Diffusion-Annealed Nickel-
ii. Affiliated-Party Transactions and Arm’s request an administrative review of the Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products from Japan,’’
antidumping duty order on certain dated May 11, 2016.
Length Test 4 See Letter from Thomas Steel to the Department
iii. Level of Trade nickel-plated, flat-rolled steel from regarding ‘‘Diffusion-Annealed Nickel-Plated Flat-
g. Cost of Production Analysis Rolled Steel from Japan: Request for Second
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Administrative Review of Antidumping Order,’’
12 Seesection 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR dated May 31, 2016.
351.213(h)(1). 44260 (July 7, 2016) (Initiation Notice). 5 See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 44262.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:52 Jun 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_26151/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-06-06 06:20:52
Document Modified: 2017-06-06 06:20:52
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective June 6, 2017. | |
| Contact | Jonathan Hill or Patrick O'Connor, AD/ CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3518 or (202) 482-0989, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 26044 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR