82 FR 26050 - Certain Steel Nails From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 107 (June 6, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 107 (June 6, 2017)
| Page Range | 26050-26052 | |
| FR Document | 2017-11668 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 6, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 26050-26052] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-11668] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-552-818] Certain Steel Nails From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain steel nails from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam). The period of review (POR) is December 29, 2014, through June 30, 2016. The Department preliminarily determines that Truong Vinh Ltd. (Truong Vinh), Rich State, Inc. (Rich State), and Dicha Sombrilla Co., Ltd. (Dicha Sombrilla) did not demonstrate their eligibility for a separate rate and are, therefore, part of the Vietnam-wide entity. Further, because Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. (the petitioner) withdrew its request for review of eight companies, we are rescinding the administrative review with regard to them. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective June 6, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chelsey Simonovich or Mark Flessner, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1979 or (202) 482-6312, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 13, 2015, the Department published in the Federal Register the antidumping duty order on certain steel nails from Vietnam.\1\ On July 5, 2016, the Department published in the Federal Register an opportunity to request administrative review of the Order.\2\ The Department received requests for a review of 11 companies.\3\ On September 12, 2016, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of this review, covering the above-referenced companies.\4\ On September 28, 2016, the Department placed entry data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on the record of this review.\5\ On October 18, 2016, the Department issued its antidumping duty questionnaires to Truong Vinh and Rich State. On November 8, 2016, both companies, in a joint submission, stated that neither intended to respond to the Department's questionnaires.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, 2015) (the Order). \2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 43584 (July 5, 2016). \3\ See Letter from Amifast Corporation, ``Amifast Corporation; Request for Administrative Review; Case No. A-522-818; Antidumping Duty Order on Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,'' dated August 1, 2016. See also Letter from Petitioner, ``Certain Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Request for Administrative Reviews,'' dated August 1, 2016. See also Letter from Olympic Manufacturing Group, ``Request for Administrative Review and Request to Defer Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (A-552-818) (POR: December 29, 2014--June 30, 2016),'' dated August 1, 2016. See also Letter from Truong Vinh, ``Request for Administrative Review and Request to Defer Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (A-552- 818) (POR: December 29, 2014--June 30, 2016),'' dated August 1, 2016. \4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 62720 (September 12 2016) (Initiation Notice). \5\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Steel Nails from Vietnam: U.S. Customs and Border Protection Information for 12/29/14-6/30/2016 Review Period,'' dated September 28, 2016. \6\ See Letter from Truong Vinh and Rich State, ``Truong Vinh Ltd. and Rich State Inc., Questionnaire Response, First Annual Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, (A-552-818),'' dated November 8, 2016. Therein, Truong Vinh and Rich State indicated that they believe that their zinc anchors would be found outside of the scope of the Order based on an ongoing scope proceeding. As such, Truong Vinh and Rich State stated that they would not respond to the Department's October 18, 2016, request for information, and that this letter constituted their full response to sections A, C, and D of the Department's questionnaire. Neither company submitted a separate rate application. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is certain steel nails having a nominal shaft length not exceeding 12 inches. Certain steel nails subject to this order are currently classified under HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05, 7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18, 7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40, 7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80, 7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30, 7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. Certain steel nails subject to this order also may be classified under HTSUS subheadings 7907.00.60.00, [[Page 26051]] 8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS subheadings. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\7\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2014-2016: Certain Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partial Rescission of Administrative Review On October 5, 2016, the petitioner withdrew its request for review with respect to the following eight companies: Astrotech Steels Private Limited; Blue Moon Logistics Private Ltd.; Bollore Logistics Vietnam Co. Ltd.; Dahnay Logistics Private Ltd; FGS Logistics Co. Ltd.; Honour Lane Shipping Ltd; SDV Vietnam Co. Ltd.; and United Nail Products Co. Ltd.\8\ No other parties requested review of these eight companies. In response to the petitioner's timely filed withdrawal request, we are rescinding this administrative review, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),\9\ with respect to the above-named companies. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Petitioner's Review Request Withdrawal Letter. \9\ See the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at the section entitled, ``Partial Rescission of Administrative Review.'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vietnam-Wide Entity The Vietnam-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity.\10\ Because no party requested a review of the Vietnam-wide entity in this review, nor did the Department self-initiate a review of the Vietnam-wide entity, the entity is not under review and the entity's rate (i.e., 323.99 percent) is not subject to change. In this administrative review, a review was requested for Truong Vinh, Rich State, and Dicha Sombrilla, but none of these companies filed a separate rate application, separate rate certification, or no-shipment letter. Accordingly, the Department considers Truong Vinh, Rich State, and Dicha Sombrilla to be part of the Vietnam-wide entity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Results of Review The Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period December 29, 2014, through January 30, 2016: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Company dumping margins (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dicha Sombrilla Co., Ltd................................ 323.99 Rich State, Inc......................................... 323.99 Truong Vinh Ltd......................................... 323.99 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the calculations performed for the preliminary results within five days of the publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because the Department preliminarily applied the Vietnam- entity margin to the mandatory respondents in this administrative review, there are no calculations to disclose. Interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.\11\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\12\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\13\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). \13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \14\ See 19 CFR 351.303. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice.\15\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.\16\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c) \16\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\17\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. We will instruct CBP to assess duties at the ad valorem margin rates published above. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if any assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. The Department will assess duties only on entries of subject merchandise (i.e., Vietnam-origin steel nails). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for shipments of the subject merchandise from Vietnam entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, [[Page 26052]] for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Truong Vinh, Rich State, and Dicha Sombrilla, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Vietnam exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed period; (3) for all Vietnam exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the NME-wide rate of 323.99 percent; and (4) for all non-Vietnam exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Vietnam exporter that supplied that non-Vietnam exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: May 24, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review 5. Discussion of the Methodology 6. Vietnam-Wide Entity 7. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-11668 Filed 6-5-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![26050 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
assess antidumping duties on all DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE On September 12, 2016, the Department
appropriate entries. Antidumping duties published in the Federal Register a
shall be assessed at rates equal to the International Trade Administration notice of initiation of this review,
cash deposit of estimated antidumping [A–552–818] covering the above-referenced
duties required at the time of entry, or companies.4 On September 28, 2016, the
withdrawal from warehouse, for Certain Steel Nails From the Socialist Department placed entry data from U.S.
consumption, in accordance with 19 Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department Results and Partial Rescission of the the record of this review.5 On October
intends to issue appropriate assessment Antidumping Duty Administrative 18, 2016, the Department issued its
Review; 2014–2016 antidumping duty questionnaires to
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
Truong Vinh and Rich State. On
after the date of publication of this AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, November 8, 2016, both companies, in
notice in the Federal Register. International Trade Administration, a joint submission, stated that neither
Notification to Importers Commerce. intended to respond to the Department’s
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce questionnaires.6
This notice serves as the only (the Department) is conducting an
reminder to importers whose entries Scope of the Order
administrative review of the
will be liquidated as a result of this antidumping duty order on certain steel The merchandise covered by this
rescission notice, of their responsibility nails from the Socialist Republic of order is certain steel nails having a
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a Vietnam (Vietnam). The period of nominal shaft length not exceeding 12
certificate regarding the reimbursement review (POR) is December 29, 2014, inches. Certain steel nails subject to this
of antidumping duties and/or through June 30, 2016. The Department order are currently classified under
countervailing duties prior to preliminarily determines that Truong HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.55.02,
Vinh Ltd. (Truong Vinh), Rich State, 7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05,
liquidation of the relevant entries
Inc. (Rich State), and Dicha Sombrilla 7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08,
during this review period. Failure to
Co., Ltd. (Dicha Sombrilla) did not 7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18,
comply with this requirement may 7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20,
result in the presumption that demonstrate their eligibility for a
separate rate and are, therefore, part of 7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40,
reimbursement of antidumping duties 7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60,
the Vietnam-wide entity. Further,
and/or countervailing duties occurred 7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80,
because Mid Continent Steel & Wire,
and the subsequent assessment of 7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30,
Inc. (the petitioner) withdrew its request
double antidumping duties. 7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00.
for review of eight companies, we are
Notification Regarding Administrative rescinding the administrative review Certain steel nails subject to this order
with regard to them. Interested parties also may be classified under HTSUS
Protective Order
are invited to comment on these subheadings 7907.00.60.00,
This notice serves as the only preliminary results.
reminder to parties subject to Case No. A–522–818; Antidumping Duty Order on
DATES: Effective June 6, 2017. Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,’’
administrative protective order (APO) of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: dated August 1, 2016. See also Letter from
their responsibility concerning the Chelsey Simonovich or Mark Flessner, Petitioner, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from the Socialist
disposition of proprietary information Republic of Vietnam: Request for Administrative
AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Reviews,’’ dated August 1, 2016. See also Letter
disclosed under APO in accordance Enforcement and Compliance, from Olympic Manufacturing Group, ‘‘Request for
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely International Trade Administration, Administrative Review and Request to Defer
written notification of return/ Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Department of Commerce, 1401 Order on Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of
destruction of APO materials or Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, Vietnam (A–552–818) (POR: December 29, 2014—
conversion to judicial protective order is DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1979 or June 30, 2016),’’ dated August 1, 2016. See also
hereby requested. Failure to comply (202) 482–6312, respectively. Letter from Truong Vinh, ‘‘Request for
Administrative Review and Request to Defer
with the regulations and the terms of an SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
APO is a sanctionable violation. Order on Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of
Background Vietnam (A–552–818) (POR: December 29, 2014—
This notice is published in June 30, 2016),’’ dated August 1, 2016.
accordance with section 751 of the Act On July 13, 2015, the Department 4 See Initiation of Antidumping and
published in the Federal Register the Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
antidumping duty order on certain steel 62720 (September 12 2016) (Initiation Notice).
Dated: May 31, 2017. nails from Vietnam.1 On July 5, 2016, 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from
Gary Taverman, the Department published in the Vietnam: U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Information for 12/29/14–6/30/2016 Review
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Federal Register an opportunity to Period,’’ dated September 28, 2016.
and Countervailing Duty Operations. request administrative review of the 6 See Letter from Truong Vinh and Rich State,
[FR Doc. 2017–11671 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am] Order.2 The Department received ‘‘Truong Vinh Ltd. and Rich State Inc.,
requests for a review of 11 companies.3 Questionnaire Response, First Annual
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
1 See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of
Order on Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam, (A–552–818),’’ dated November 8, 2016.
Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, Therein, Truong Vinh and Rich State indicated that
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: they believe that their zinc anchors would be found
Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, outside of the scope of the Order based on an
2015) (the Order). ongoing scope proceeding. As such, Truong Vinh
2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
and Rich State stated that they would not respond
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to the Department’s October 18, 2016, request for
to Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 43584 information, and that this letter constituted their
(July 5, 2016). full response to sections A, C, and D of the
3 See Letter from Amifast Corporation, ‘‘Amifast Department’s questionnaire. Neither company
Corporation; Request for Administrative Review; submitted a separate rate application.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:52 Jun 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_26157/page/1.svg)
![26052 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
for consumption on or after the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE days of the publication of the notice of
publication date, as provided by section initiation of the requested review. In
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Truong International Trade Administration this case, the Fair Trade Committee
Vinh, Rich State, and Dicha Sombrilla, [C–570–955] timely withdrew its request for review
the cash deposit rate will be that within the 90-day deadline, and no
established in the final results of this Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From other party requested an administrative
review (except, if the rate is zero or de the People’s Republic of China: review of the CVD order. Therefore, in
minimis, then zero cash deposit will be Rescission of Countervailing Duty response to the timely withdrawal of the
required); (2) for previously investigated Administrative Review; 2015 request for review, and in accordance
or reviewed Vietnam exporters not AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are
listed above that received a separate rate International Trade Administration, rescinding the administrative review of
in a prior segment of this proceeding, Commerce. the CVD order on MC Bricks from the
the cash deposit rate will continue to be SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce PRC for the period January 1, 2015,
the existing exporter-specific rate (the Department) is rescinding the through December 31, 2015, in its
published for the most recently administrative review of the entirety.
completed period; (3) for all Vietnam countervailing duty (CVD) order on
Assessment
exporters of subject merchandise that certain magnesia carbon bricks (MC
have not been found to be entitled to a Bricks) from the People’s Republic of The Department will instruct CBP to
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will China (PRC) for the period January 1, assess CVD duties on all appropriate
be the NME-wide rate of 323.99 percent; 2015, through December 31, 2015. entries. Because this administrative
and (4) for all non-Vietnam exporters of DATES: Effective June 6, 2017. review is being rescinded in its entirety,
subject merchandise which have not FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the entries to which this administrative
received their own rate, the cash deposit Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations, review pertain shall be assessed CVD
rate will be the rate applicable to the Office VII, Enforcement and duties that are equal to the cash deposits
Vietnam exporter that supplied that Compliance, International Trade of estimated CVD duties required at the
non-Vietnam exporter. These deposit Administration, U.S. Department of time of entry, or withdrawal from
requirements, when imposed, shall Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue warehouse, for consumption, in
remain in effect until further notice. NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone accordance with 19 CFR
(202) 482–3586.
Notification to Importers 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
intends to issue appropriate assessment
This notice also serves as a Background instructions to CBP 15 days after the
preliminary reminder to importers of On November 9, 2016, based on a publication of this notice in the Federal
their responsibility under 19 CFR timely request for review by the Register.
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Magnesia Carbon Bricks Fair Trade Notifications
regarding the reimbursement of Committee (Fair Trade Committee),1 the
antidumping duties prior to liquidation Department of Commerce (the This notice serves as a final reminder
of the relevant entries during this Department) published in the Federal to parties subject to administrative
review period. Failure to comply with Register a notice of initiation of an protective order (APO) of their
this requirement could result in the administrative review of the CVD order responsibility concerning the return or
Department’s presumption that on MC Bricks from the PRC with respect destruction of proprietary information
reimbursement of antidumping duties to 18 companies for the period of review disclosed under APO, in accordance
occurred and the subsequent assessment (POR) January 1, 2015, through with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
of double antidumping duties. December 31, 2015.2 No other party written notification of the return or
We are issuing and publishing these requested an administrative review. destruction of APO materials or the
results in accordance with sections Rescission of Review conversion to judicial protective order is
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the hereby requested. Failure to comply
CFR 351.213. Department will rescind an with the regulations and the terms of an
Dated: May 24, 2017. administrative review, in whole or in APO is a sanctionable violation.
Ronald K. Lorentzen, part, if the party that requested the This notice is published in
review withdraws its request within 90 accordance with section 751 of the Act
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance. and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
1 See Letter to the Secretary from the Fair Trade
Committee, ‘‘Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from Dated: May 31, 2017.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the People’s Republic of China: Request for Gary Taverman,
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Administrative Review,’’ (September 30, 2016). The
Fair Trade Committee is an ad hoc association Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
1. Summary and Countervailing Duty Operations.
comprised of the following U.S. producers of
2. Background magnesia carbon bricks: Resco Products, Inc.; [FR Doc. 2017–11674 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am]
3. Scope of the Order Magnesita Refractories Company; and
HarbisonWalker International. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
4. Partial Rescission of Administrative
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Review
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
5. Discussion of the Methodology
78778 (November 9, 2016) (November 2016
6. Vietnam-Wide Entity Initiation Notice); see also Initiation of
7. Recommendation Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
[FR Doc. 2017–11668 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am] Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 4294 (January 13,
2017), which corrected the misspelling of certain
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P company names in the November 2016 Initiation
Notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:52 Jun 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_26157/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-06-06 06:21:06
Document Modified: 2017-06-06 06:21:06
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective June 6, 2017. | |
| Contact | Chelsey Simonovich or Mark Flessner, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1979 or (202) 482-6312, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 26050 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR