82 FR 26672 - Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings for the Delfin LNG LLC Application To Export Liquefied Natural Gas to Non-Free Trade Agreement Countries
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 109 (June 8, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 109 (June 8, 2017)
| Page Range | 26672-26676 | |
| FR Document | 2017-11907 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 109 (Thursday, June 8, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 26672-26676] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-11907] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings for the Delfin LNG LLC Application To Export Liquefied Natural Gas to Non-Free Trade Agreement Countries AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, Department of Energy. [[Page 26673]] ACTION: Record of decision. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy (FE) announces its decision in Delfin LNG LLC (Delfin), FE Docket No. 13-147-LNG, to issue DOE/FE Order No. 4028 (Order No. 4028), granting long-term, multi-contract authorization for Delfin to export domestically produced liquefied natural gas (LNG). Delfin seeks authorization to export the LNG in a volume equivalent to approximately 657.5 billion cubic feet per year (Bcf/yr) of natural gas (1.8 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d)) by vessel from its proposed floating liquefaction facility to be located in West Cameron Block 167 in the Gulf of Mexico, offshore of Cameron Parish, Louisiana (Liquefaction Facility).\1\ Delfin seeks to export this LNG for a 20-year term to any country with which the United States does not have a free trade agreement (FTA) requiring national treatment for trade in natural gas, and with which trade is not prohibited by U.S. law or policy (non-FTA countries). Order No. 4028 is issued under section 3(a) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and DOE's regulations. Because the floating Liquefaction Facility will be a ``deepwater port'' within the meaning of the Deepwater Port Act of 1974, as amended,\2\ the Liquefaction Facility requires a deepwater port license from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Maritime Administration (MARAD). DOE participated as a cooperating agency with MARAD, in conjunction with the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), in preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) analyzing the potential environmental impacts that would result from the proposed Liquefaction Facility and related onshore facilities (Delfin Onshore Facility) \3\ (collectively, the Delfin Liquefaction Project). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Delfin states that the Liquefaction Facility (or ``deepwater port'') will be located offshore in West Cameron Block 167. Delfin's floating liquefied natural gas vessels (discussed herein) will be moored in additional offshore blocks, including West Cameron Blocks 319, 327, 328, 334, and 335. \2\ See 33 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.; 33 CFR part 148. \3\ Although the Delfin EIS covers the entire Delfin Liquefaction Project, the Delfin Onshore Facility falls under the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and is subject to separate regulatory approval by FERC pursuant to sections 7(b) and 7(c) of the NGA in FERC Docket No. CP15-490. ADDRESSES: The EIS and this Record of Decision (ROD) are available on DOE's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Web site at: https://www.energy.gov/nepa/eis-0531-port-delfin-lng-project-deepwater-port-application-louisiana. Order No. 4028 is available on DOE/FE's Web site at: https://fossil.energy.gov/ng_regulation/applications-2013-delfinlngllc13-147-lng. For additional information about the docket in these proceedings, contact Larine Moore, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Regulation and International Engagement, Office of Oil and Natural Gas, Office of Fossil Energy, Room 3E-042, 1000 Independence --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To obtain additional information about the EIS or the ROD, contact Kyle W. Moorman, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Regulation and International Engagement, Office of Oil and Natural Gas, Office of Fossil Energy, Room 3E-042, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-5600, or Edward Le Duc, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Environment, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, 202- 586-4007. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE prepared this ROD and Floodplain Statement of Findings pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] 4321, et seq.), and in compliance with the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) implementing regulations for NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] parts 1500 through 1508), DOE's implementing procedures for NEPA (10 CFR part 1021), and DOE's ``Compliance with Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements'' (10 CFR part 1022). Background Delfin, a Louisiana limited liability company with its principal place of business in Dallas, Texas, proposes to construct, own, and operate a deepwater port with floating liquefaction and export facilities, and related onshore facilities, in West Cameron Block 167 in the Gulf of Mexico, approximately 30 miles offshore of Cameron Parish, Louisiana. The proposed Liquefaction Project will connect to the U.S. natural gas pipeline and transmission system through the reuse and repurpose of two existing offshore pipelines and proposed offshore pipeline laterals connecting to the Delfin Onshore Facility. On November 12, 2013, Delfin filed an application (Application) with DOE/FE seeking authorization to export domestically produced LNG in a volume equivalent to 657.5 Bcf/yr of natural gas to non-FTA countries. In Order No. 4028, DOE/FE is authorizing Delfin to export LNG from the proposed Delfin Liquefaction Facility in the full volume requested. In 2014, DOE/FE granted Delfin's separate authorization to export LNG from the proposed Liquefaction Facility to FTA countries in a volume equivalent to 657.5 Bcf/yr of natural gas (1.8 Bcf/d) for a 20- year term.\4\ The authorized FTA export volume is not additive to the export volume authorized in this proceeding. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Delfin LNG LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 3393, FE Docket No 13-129- LNG, Order Granting Long-Term, Multi-Contract Authorization to Export Liquefied Natural Gas by Vessel from a Proposed Floating Liquefaction Project and Deepwater Port 30 Miles Offshore of Louisiana to Free Trade Agreement Nations (Feb. 20, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additionally, on May 8, 2015, Delfin filed its application with MARAD under the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 to site, construct, and operate the Delfin Liquefaction Project. On March 13, 2017, MARAD found that the Delfin Liquefaction Project will be ``in the national interest'' under section 4(c)(3) of the Deepwater Port Act \5\ and issued a record of decision (MARAD ROD) authorizing the issuance of a deepwater port license.\6\ Delfin's deepwater port license is subject to various conditions discussed in the MARAD ROD, which will be set forth in the deepwater port license upon its issuance.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ 33 U.S.C. 1503(c)(3) (allowing the Secretary of MARAD to issue a license for a deepwater port if, in relevant part, ``he determines that the construction and operation of the deepwater port will be in the national interest and consistent with national security and other national policy goals and objectives, including energy sufficiency and environmental quality''). \6\ U.S. Dep't of Transportation Maritime Administration, Secretary's Record of Decision on the Deepwater Port License Application of Delfin LNG, LLC, at 65 (Para. 3), 68 (Mar. 13, 2017). \7\ See, e.g., MARAD ROD at 16. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On May 8, 2015, Delfin submitted its application for the Delfin Onshore Facility to FERC. To date, Delfin is still awaiting its NGA section 7 authorizations from FERC. The Delfin Liquefaction Project will be subject to any conditions outlined within FERC's order. Project Description Delfin's proposed Liquefaction Facility will be located off the coast of Cameron Parish, Louisiana, in Federal waters within the Outer Continental Shelf West Cameron Area. Water depths of the actual site ranges from 64 to 72 feet. The Liquefaction Facility primarily will consist of four semi-permanent floating liquefied natural gas vessels (FLNGVs) with a total liquefaction capability of 13.3 million metric tons per annum (mtpa) of LNG, or approximately 657.5 Bcf/yr of natural gas. Each FLNGV will have LNG storage capacity of 211,460 cubic meters; four disconnectable tower yoke mooring [[Page 26674]] systems (TYMS); four pipeline riser components, four service vessel mooring points; and four 30-inch diameter pipeline laterals, each approximately 6,400 inches in length. The Liquefaction Facility will reuse and repurpose two existing offshore pipeline systems (formerly the U-T Offshore Systems, LLC (UTOS) and High Island Offshore Systems, LLC (HIOS) pipeline systems); and include one 700-foot, 42-inch diameter pipeline bypass around an existing offshore platform manifold infrastructure at West Cameron Block 167 to connect to the former UTOS and HIOS pipeline systems. The Delfin Onshore Facility will require new pipeline and associated pipeline facilities in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana, to supply natural gas to the liquefaction facility from existing onshore natural gas transmission pipelines. Components of the Delfin Onshore Facility will primarily consist of the reactivation of 1.1 miles if existing 42-inch pipeline (former UTOS pipeline) which runs to an existing compressor station; installation of a new compressor; construction of 0.25 miles of 42-inch pipeline to connect the former UTOS line to a new meter station; and construction of 0.6 miles of twin 30-inch pipelines between an existing compressor station and the new compressor station. EIS Process MARAD and the USCG were the co-lead federal agencies for the environmental review of the Delfin Liquefaction Project and initiated the NEPA process by publishing a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS for the Delfin Liquefaction Project on July 29, 2015. MARAD and USCG conducted a single environmental review process that assessed both the onshore and offshore components of the Delfin Liquefaction Project.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See MARAD ROD at 23-24, 45. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DOE participated as a cooperating agency in the preparation of the EIS. MARAD and USCG issued the draft EIS and published in the Federal Register a notice of availability (NOA) for the draft EIS on July 15, 2016 (81 FR 46157). MARAD and USCG issued the final EIS \9\ and published a NOA for the final EIS on November 28, 2016 (81 FR 85678). The final EIS addresses comments received on the draft EIS. The final EIS also addresses water resources; biological resources; essential fish habitat; geological resources; cultural resources; ocean use, land use, recreation, and visual resources; transportation; air quality; noise; socioeconomics; safety; cumulative impacts; and alternatives. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Port Delfin LNG Project Deepwater Port Application, Docket No. USCG-2015-0472 (Nov. 2016) (EIS). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on the final EIS, MARAD and USCG concluded that the issuance of deepwater port license will subject the Delfin Liquefaction Project to the implementation of Best Management Practices and mitigation measures recommended by federal and state agencies to reduce the environmental impacts that would otherwise result from the Project's construction and operation.\10\ Subsequently, the MARAD ROD determined that Delfin's requested deepwater port license met the nine criteria required for approval under section 4(c) of the Deepwater Port Act, 33 U.S.C. 1503(c), subject to certain conditions. MARAD describes many of these conditions in the ROD, but indicated that the precise conditions will be set forth in the License upon its issuance at a later date.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See id. at 4-14 to 4-23. \11\ See MARAD ROD at 16. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with 40 CFR 1506.3, after an independent review of MARAD and USCG's final EIS, DOE/FE adopted MARAD and USCG's final EIS (DOE/EIS-0531) on April 18, 2017. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency published a notice of the adoption on April 28, 2017 (82 FR 19715). Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas From the United States (Addendum) On June 4, 2014, DOE/FE published the Draft Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas from the United States (Draft Addendum) for public comment (79 FR 32,258). The purpose of this review was to provide additional information to the public concerning the potential environmental impacts of unconventional natural gas exploration and production activities, including hydraulic fracturing. Although not required by NEPA, DOE/FE prepared the Draft Addendum in an effort to be responsive to the public and to provide the best information available on a subject that had been raised by commenters in this and other LNG export proceedings. The 45-day comment period on the Draft Addendum closed on July 21, 2014. DOE/FE received 40,745 comments in 18 separate submissions, and considered those comments in issuing the final Addendum on August 15, 2014. DOE provided a summary of the comments received and responses to substantive comments in Appendix B of the Addendum.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ We take administrative notice of the Addendum in this proceeding. See also EIS at ES-14, 1-10, 4-169, 6-2, and 6.3 for MARAD's and USCG's discussion of the Addendum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alternatives The EIS analyzed alternatives that could achieve the Delfin Liquefaction Project's objectives. The range of alternatives analyzed included alternative deepwater port designs, alternative LNG liquefaction technologies, alternative cooling media, alternative pipeline routes, alternative port locations, alternative use of existing West Cameron 167 offshore manifold platform, alternative mooring systems, alternative anchoring methods, alternative Delfin Onshore Facility locations, a no action alternative, and energy alternatives. Alternatives were evaluated and compared to the Delfin Liquefaction Project to determine if the alternatives were reasonable and environmentally preferable. In analyzing alternative deepwater port designs, the EIS reviewed and evaluated four different designs: (1) Gravity-based structure; (2) Fixed platform-based unit; (3) Floating HiLoad port; and (4) FLNGV. The EIS then evaluated those four different designs based on four environmental and technical considerations: (1) Air emissions; (2) general environmental effects; (3) visual impacts; and (4) water depth and seafloor topography. Both the Gravity-based structure and Floating HiLoad port were eliminated due to the large seafloor impacts and lack of design purpose for producing LNG for export. The fixed platform- based unit would also likely result in additional seafloor impacts due to foundational requirements. In analyzing alternative LNG liquefaction technologies for use on the FLNGV, the EIS reviewed three different technologies: (1) Expander- based process; (2) dual mixed refrigerant process; and (3) single mixed refrigerant (SMR) process. When evaluating the three technologies, the EIS relied on efficiency and simplicity of each technology when used aboard a FLNGV. The SMR technology offered a balance of medium to high efficiency along with simplicity of operation when aboard a FLNGV in comparison to the other two alternatives. For analyzing alternative cooling media, the EIS evaluated two types for use aboard the FLNGV: (1) Open-loop, water-cooled heat exchangers or (2) air-cooled heat exchangers. Although the open-loop, water-cooled heat exchanger [[Page 26675]] is more efficient, smaller in size, and less expensive, its high use of seawater and discharge method could have additional impacts on marine life in comparison to the air-cooled heater exchanger. As a result, the EIS concluded the use of the air-cooled heat exchanger was the preferred alternative. In analyzing alternative pipeline routes, the EIS utilized several different criteria to identify existing pipeline systems. Those criteria include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) A location within 150 miles of Henry Hub (2) pipelines with a 36-inch or larger diameter; (3) a water-depth location suitable for construction and operation of a deepwater port; (4) proximity of 2 to 8 miles of a designated shipping safety fairway; and (5) pipeline capacity for the requested volume. From this criteria, the EIS then identified the following six existing pipeline systems: (1) HIOS/UTOS; (2) Natural Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Stingray Pipeline Company, LLC; (3) Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; (4) Kinetica Partners, LLC (western section); (5) Sea Robin Pipeline Company, LLC; and (6) Kinetica Partners, LLC (central section). Of the six pipeline systems, only two met the siting requirements for the proposed Project: HIOS/UTOS and Natural Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Stingray Pipeline Company, LLC. Upon evaluating the two remaining pipeline systems, the EIS concluded that due to a larger available volume capacity, ultimately the HIOS and UTOS systems were the preferred systems. For analyzing alternative port locations, the EIS initially relied upon the USCG guidelines on siting for LNG deepwater port terminals in 33 CFR 148.720. Based on those guidelines, the EIS then selected three locations: (1) Along the HIOS/UTOS pipeline systems within West Cameron Block area; (2) along the HIOS/UTOS pipeline systems within deeper water of the West Cameron Block area, approximately 10 nautical miles south-southwest of alternative 1; and (3) along the Natural Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Stingray Pipeline Company, systems, approximately 27 nautical miles from alternative 2.\13\ From these three locations, the EIS then compared the following factors: (1) Avoidance of cultural resources; (2) engineering; (3) avoidance of geological hazards; (4) air emissions and noise; (5) water and sediment quality; (6) commercial and recreational fishing; (7) wildlife and protected species; (8) socioeconomics; and (9) marine uses and aesthetics. The EIS concluded that due to the distance from shore, alternatives 2 and 3 would require additional service trips as well as additional compression requirements. Furthermore, these alternatives would require longer piles for structure purposes that would result in greater noise impacts on marine species. Overall, these factors would result in greater noise and air emissions compared to the proposed site (alternative 1) and thus were not selected. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See EIS pages 2-38 through 2-41 for further details and maps of exact site locations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In analyzing alternative use of existing West Cameron 167 offshore manifold platform, the EIS did not provide any alternatives to the proposed bypass pipeline. Although Delfin proposes to construct 700 feet of bypass pipeline on the seafloor, the reuse of the existing offshore platform would result in greater potential impacts on the area. Reuse of the existing offshore manifold platform would require removal of the infrastructure and interactions with six other pipeline systems utilizing the platform. The EIS made no further analysis of this Project area. For analyzing alternative mooring systems, the EIS evaluated two different mooring systems: (1) Permanent mooring system and (2) disconnectable mooring system. The main design criteria for the mooring system is to provide a stable environment for the FLNGV operations. For the permanent mooring system, the FLNGV would stay moored to the location regardless of weather and ocean conditions, thus eliminating the flexibility and project design for the self-propelled FLNGV. Conversely, the disconnectable mooring system allows the needed flexibility for the FLNGV to depart for maintenance purposes as well as allow for a much smaller anchoring system. As a result, the EIS selected the proposed disconnectable mooring system. In analyzing alternative anchoring methods for installing the TYMS mooring structure, the EIS considered five different anchor designs. The design alternatives included: (1) Suction anchors; (2) driven piles; (3) fluke anchors; (4) gravity-based anchors; and (5) grouted pile anchors. For evaluating the anchor design alternatives, the EIS considered the following six issues: (1) Air emissions; (2) water use and discharge; (3) turbidity, sedimentation, and seafloor impacts; (4) fisheries impacts; (5) noise impacts; and (6) decommissioning impacts. Based on these six issues, the EIS concluded that the driven piles had a smaller footprint, fewer installation impacts, and structural design advantages pursuant to the geotechnical evaluation of the affected area. For evaluating alternative Delfin Onshore Facility locations, the EIS analyzed and determined the feasibility of the locations based on proximity to a gas supply pipeline for the Port, to various gas supply header pipelines, and to existing natural gas pipeline infrastructure. From these factors, the EIS evaluated the following four locations: (1) PSI Cameron Meadows Gas Plant; (2) Transco Station 44; (3) a greenfield location adjacent to the PSI Cameron Meadows Gas Plant; and (4) a greenfield location adjacent to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company facilities on the north side of Highway 82 approximately 1.3 miles east of the three other alternative locations.\14\ The EIS then evaluated the four locations based on the following criteria: (1) Proximity to the feasible pipeline systems; (2) availability of land for siting a compressor station; (3) current land use; (4) proximity to sensitive resources (i.e. streams, wetlands, and wildlife; (5) proximity to noise sensitive areas; and (6) feasibility of air permitting. Due to the potential impacts to the greenfield sites, alternatives 3 and 4 were eliminated as those impacts would be greater than the impacts resulting from the use of existing infrastructure. Finally, the EIS concluded that due to existing pipeline infrastructure, alternative 1 would be the preferred location for the compressor station while alternative 2 would be the preferred locations for the meter station and interconnection with gas supply header pipelines. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Figures 2.3-4 and 2.3-6 within the EIS for more details. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In analyzing the no action alternative, the EIS reviewed the effects of not constructing the Delfin Liquefaction Project. Environmentally Preferred Alternative When compared against the other action alternatives assessed in the EIS, as discussed above, the proposed Delfin Liquefaction Project is the environmentally preferable alternative. Although the no action alternative would avoid the environmental impacts identified in the EIS, adoption of this alternative would not meet the Delfin Liquefaction Project objectives. Decision DOE has decided to issue Order No. 4028 authorizing Delfin to export domestically produced LNG by vessel from the proposed Delfin Liquefaction Facility located off the coast of Cameron Parish, Louisiana, to non-FTA countries, [[Page 26676]] in a volume equivalent to approximately 657.5 Bcf/yr of natural gas for a term of 20 years to commence on the earlier of the date of first commercial export or seven years from the date that the Order is issued. Concurrently with this Record of Decision, DOE/FE is issuing Order No. 4028, in which it finds that the requested authorization has not been shown to be inconsistent with the public interest, and that the Application should be granted subject to compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Order, including all terms and conditions described by MARAD in its ROD and/or imposed in MARAD's forthcoming deepwater port license for Delfin. Additionally, DOE/FE's authorization is conditioned on Delfin's receipt of all connected local, state, and federal permits (including FERC's authorization under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act for the Delfin Onshore Facility), and on Delfin's on- going compliance with any other preventative and mitigative measures imposed by other federal or state agencies. Basis of Decision DOE's decision is based upon the analysis of potential environmental impacts presented in the EIS, and DOE's determination in Order No. 4028 that it has not been shown that Delfin's proposed exports will be inconsistent with the public interest, as is required to deny Delfin's Application under NGA section 3(a). Although not required by NEPA, DOE/FE also considered the Addendum, which summarizes available information on potential upstream impacts associated with unconventional natural gas activities, such as hydraulic fracturing. Mitigation As a condition of its decision to issue Order No. 4028, DOE is imposing requirements that will avoid or minimize the environmental impacts of the proposed Liquefaction Facility. These conditions include the Best Management Practices, mitigation measures, and conditions in the MARAD ROD and forthcoming deepwater port license. Mitigation measures beyond those included in Order No. 4028 that are enforceable by other Federal and state agencies are additional conditions of Order No. 4028. With these conditions, DOE/FE has determined that all practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental harm from the Delfin Liquefaction Project have been adopted. Floodplain Statement of Findings DOE prepared this Floodplain Statement of Findings in accordance with DOE's regulations, entitled ``Compliance with Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements'' (10 CFR part 1022). The required floodplain assessment was conducted during development and preparation of the EIS (see Sections 4.11.1 of the EIS). The EIS determined that the proposed Delfin Onshore Facility site is classified as having a 1-percent-annual-chance of flooding. While the placement of these facilities within floodplains would be unavoidable, DOE has determined that the current design for the Delfin Liquefaction Project minimizes potential harm to or in the floodplain to the extent practicable. Issued in Washington, DC, on June 1, 2017. Jarad Daniels, Acting Assistant Secretary, Office of Fossil Energy. [FR Doc. 2017-11907 Filed 6-7-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
![26672 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 109 / Thursday, June 8, 2017 / Notices
the information will have practical DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
utility; request more information on this
• Evaluate the accuracy of the Office of the Secretary proposed information collection or to
agency’s estimate of the burden of the [Docket ID: DOD–2013–OS–0161] obtain a copy of the proposal and
proposed collection of information, associated collection instruments,
including the validity of the Proposed Collection; Comment please write to the Defense Finance and
methodology and assumptions used; Request Accounting Services—Cleveland, 1240
East 9th Street, NP 7th Floor, Cleveland,
• Propose ways to enhance the AGENCY: Defense Finance and OH 44199, ATTN: Ms. Laurie Eldridge,
quality, utility, and clarity of the Accounting Service (DFAS), DOD. laurie.eldridge@dfas.mil, (216) 204–
information to be collected; and ACTION: Notice. 3631.
• Propose ways to minimize the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In compliance with the
SUMMARY:
burden of the collection of information Title; Associated Form; and OMB
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
on those who are to respond, including Number: Claim Certification and
Defense Finance and Accounting
through the use of appropriate Voucher for Death Gratuity Payment;
Service (DFAS) announces a proposed
automated, electronic, mechanical, or DD Form 397; OMB Control Number
public information collection and seeks
other technological collection 0730–0017.
public comment on the provisions
techniques or other forms of information Needs and Uses: The information
thereof. Comments are invited on:
technology. collection requirement allows the
Whether the proposed collection of
Comments information is necessary for the proper government to collect the signatures and
performance of the functions of the information needed to pay a death
A 60-day Notice requesting public agency, including whether the gratuity. Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1475–
comment was published in the Federal information shall have practical utility; 1480, a designated beneficiary(ies) or
Register on March 24, 2017. This the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of next-of-kin can receive a death gratuity
comment period ended May 23, 2017. the burden of the proposed information payment for a deceased service member.
No public comments were received in collection; ways to enhance the quality, This form serves as a record of the
response to this Notice. utility, and clarity of the information to disbursement. The DoD Financial
Description: CNCS is seeking approval be collected; and ways to minimize the Management Regulation (FMR), Volume
of the National Service Trust Enrollment burden of the information collection on 7A, Chapter 36, defines the eligible
Form and the National Service Trust respondents, including through the use beneficiaries and procedures for
Exit Form, which is used by of automated collection techniques or payment. To provide internal controls
AmeriCorps members and program staff other forms of information technology. for this benefit, and to comply with the
to enroll in the National Service Trust above-cited statutes, the information
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
and to document the completion of a requested is needed to substantiate the
comments received by August 7, 2017.
member’s term of service, a requirement ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, receipt of the benefit.
Affected Public: Individuals or
to receiving a Segal Education Award, identified by docket number and title, Households.
and to meet other legal and program by any of the following methods: Annual Burden Hours: 250 hours.
requirements. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// Number of Respondents: 500.
Type of Review: Renewal. www.regulations.gov. Follow the Responses per Respondent: 1.
Agency: Corporation for National and instructions for submitting comments. Average Burden per Response: 30
Community Service. • Mail: Department of Defense, Office minutes.
of the Deputy Chief Management Frequency: On occasion.
Title: National Service Trust Officer, Directorate for Oversight and The service Casualty Office completes
Enrollment Form and National Service Compliance, Regulatory and Advisory the upper portion of the DD Form 397
Trust Exit Form. Committee Division, 4800 Mark Center and provides the form to the
OMB Number: 3045–0006. Drive, Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09B, beneficiaries. The beneficiaries
Agency Number: None. Alexandria, VA 22350–1700. complete their portion of the form and
Instructions: All submissions received then sign and have it witnessed. Once
Affected Public: AmeriCorps must include the agency name, docket the documents are completed, they are
members, grantee and other program number and title for this Federal forwarded to DFAS for payment.
staff. Register document. The general policy Dated: June 2, 2017.
Total Respondents: 160,000. for comments and other submissions Aaron Siegel,
Frequency: One per form. from members of the public is to make
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison
Average Time per Response: Averages these submissions available for public Officer, Department of Defense.
10 minutes per form. viewing on the Internet at http://
[FR Doc. 2017–11847 Filed 6–7–17; 8:45 am]
www.regulations.gov as they are
Estimated Total Burden Hours: received without change, including any BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
266,667. personal identifiers or contact
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): information.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
None. Any associated form(s) for this
Total Burden Cost (operating/ collection may be located within this
Record of Decision and Floodplain
maintenance): None. same electronic docket and downloaded
Statement of Findings for the Delfin
for review/testing. Follow the
Dated: June 1, 2017. LNG LLC Application To Export
instructions at http://
Erin Dahlin, Liquefied Natural Gas to Non-Free
www.regulations.gov for submitting
Deputy Chief of Program Operations. Trade Agreement Countries
comments. Please submit comments on
[FR Doc. 2017–11891 Filed 6–7–17; 8:45 am] any given form identified by docket AGENCY:Office of Fossil Energy,
BILLING CODE 6050–28–P number, form number, and title. Department of Energy.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Jun 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_26781/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 109 / Thursday, June 8, 2017 / Notices 26673
ACTION: Record of decision. https://fossil.energy.gov/ng_regulation/ In 2014, DOE/FE granted Delfin’s
applications-2013-delfinlngllc13-147- separate authorization to export LNG
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of lng. For additional information about from the proposed Liquefaction Facility
Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy the docket in these proceedings, contact to FTA countries in a volume equivalent
(FE) announces its decision in Delfin Larine Moore, U.S. Department of to 657.5 Bcf/yr of natural gas (1.8 Bcf/
LNG LLC (Delfin), FE Docket No. 13– Energy, Office of Regulation and d) for a 20-year term.4 The authorized
147–LNG, to issue DOE/FE Order No. International Engagement, Office of Oil FTA export volume is not additive to
4028 (Order No. 4028), granting long- and Natural Gas, Office of Fossil Energy, the export volume authorized in this
term, multi-contract authorization for Room 3E–042, 1000 Independence proceeding.
Delfin to export domestically produced Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585. Additionally, on May 8, 2015, Delfin
liquefied natural gas (LNG). Delfin seeks filed its application with MARAD under
authorization to export the LNG in a FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
obtain additional information about the the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 to site,
volume equivalent to approximately construct, and operate the Delfin
657.5 billion cubic feet per year (Bcf/yr) EIS or the ROD, contact Kyle W.
Moorman, U.S. Department of Energy, Liquefaction Project. On March 13,
of natural gas (1.8 billion cubic feet per 2017, MARAD found that the Delfin
day (Bcf/d)) by vessel from its proposed Office of Regulation and International
Engagement, Office of Oil and Natural Liquefaction Project will be ‘‘in the
floating liquefaction facility to be national interest’’ under section 4(c)(3)
located in West Cameron Block 167 in Gas, Office of Fossil Energy, Room 3E–
042, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., of the Deepwater Port Act 5 and issued
the Gulf of Mexico, offshore of Cameron a record of decision (MARAD ROD)
Parish, Louisiana (Liquefaction Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586–5600,
or Edward Le Duc, U.S. Department of authorizing the issuance of a deepwater
Facility).1 Delfin seeks to export this port license.6 Delfin’s deepwater port
LNG for a 20-year term to any country Energy, Office of the Assistant General
Counsel for Environment, 1000 license is subject to various conditions
with which the United States does not discussed in the MARAD ROD, which
have a free trade agreement (FTA) Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, 202–586–4007. will be set forth in the deepwater port
requiring national treatment for trade in license upon its issuance.7
natural gas, and with which trade is not SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE
prepared this ROD and Floodplain On May 8, 2015, Delfin submitted its
prohibited by U.S. law or policy (non- application for the Delfin Onshore
FTA countries). Order No. 4028 is Statement of Findings pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act of Facility to FERC. To date, Delfin is still
issued under section 3(a) of the Natural awaiting its NGA section 7
Gas Act (NGA) and DOE’s regulations. 1969 (42 United States Code [U.S.C.]
4321, et seq.), and in compliance with authorizations from FERC. The Delfin
Because the floating Liquefaction Liquefaction Project will be subject to
Facility will be a ‘‘deepwater port’’ the Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) implementing regulations for any conditions outlined within FERC’s
within the meaning of the Deepwater order.
Port Act of 1974, as amended,2 the NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations
Liquefaction Facility requires a [CFR] parts 1500 through 1508), DOE’s Project Description
deepwater port license from the U.S. implementing procedures for NEPA (10 Delfin’s proposed Liquefaction
Department of Transportation’s CFR part 1021), and DOE’s ‘‘Compliance Facility will be located off the coast of
Maritime Administration (MARAD). with Floodplain and Wetland Cameron Parish, Louisiana, in Federal
DOE participated as a cooperating Environmental Review Requirements’’ waters within the Outer Continental
agency with MARAD, in conjunction (10 CFR part 1022). Shelf West Cameron Area. Water depths
with the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), in Background of the actual site ranges from 64 to 72
preparing an Environmental Impact feet. The Liquefaction Facility primarily
Statement (EIS) analyzing the potential Delfin, a Louisiana limited liability
will consist of four semi-permanent
environmental impacts that would company with its principal place of
floating liquefied natural gas vessels
result from the proposed Liquefaction business in Dallas, Texas, proposes to
(FLNGVs) with a total liquefaction
Facility and related onshore facilities construct, own, and operate a deepwater
capability of 13.3 million metric tons
(Delfin Onshore Facility) 3 (collectively, port with floating liquefaction and
per annum (mtpa) of LNG, or
the Delfin Liquefaction Project). export facilities, and related onshore
approximately 657.5 Bcf/yr of natural
ADDRESSES: The EIS and this Record of
facilities, in West Cameron Block 167 in
gas. Each FLNGV will have LNG storage
Decision (ROD) are available on DOE’s the Gulf of Mexico, approximately 30
capacity of 211,460 cubic meters; four
National Environmental Policy Act miles offshore of Cameron Parish,
disconnectable tower yoke mooring
(NEPA) Web site at: https:// Louisiana. The proposed Liquefaction
www.energy.gov/nepa/eis-0531-port- Project will connect to the U.S. natural 4 Delfin LNG LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 3393, FE
delfin-lng-project-deepwater-port- gas pipeline and transmission system Docket No 13–129–LNG, Order Granting Long-
application-louisiana. Order No. 4028 is through the reuse and repurpose of two Term, Multi-Contract Authorization to Export
available on DOE/FE’s Web site at: existing offshore pipelines and Liquefied Natural Gas by Vessel from a Proposed
proposed offshore pipeline laterals Floating Liquefaction Project and Deepwater Port 30
Miles Offshore of Louisiana to Free Trade
1 Delfin states that the Liquefaction Facility (or connecting to the Delfin Onshore Agreement Nations (Feb. 20, 2014).
‘‘deepwater port’’) will be located offshore in West Facility. 5 33 U.S.C. 1503(c)(3) (allowing the Secretary of
Cameron Block 167. Delfin’s floating liquefied On November 12, 2013, Delfin filed MARAD to issue a license for a deepwater port if,
natural gas vessels (discussed herein) will be in relevant part, ‘‘he determines that the
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
an application (Application) with DOE/
moored in additional offshore blocks, including construction and operation of the deepwater port
West Cameron Blocks 319, 327, 328, 334, and 335.
FE seeking authorization to export will be in the national interest and consistent with
2 See 33 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.; 33 CFR part 148. domestically produced LNG in a volume national security and other national policy goals
3 Although the Delfin EIS covers the entire Delfin equivalent to 657.5 Bcf/yr of natural gas and objectives, including energy sufficiency and
Liquefaction Project, the Delfin Onshore Facility to non-FTA countries. In Order No. environmental quality’’).
6 U.S. Dep’t of Transportation Maritime
falls under the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy 4028, DOE/FE is authorizing Delfin to
Regulatory Commission (FERC), and is subject to Administration, Secretary’s Record of Decision on
separate regulatory approval by FERC pursuant to
export LNG from the proposed Delfin the Deepwater Port License Application of Delfin
sections 7(b) and 7(c) of the NGA in FERC Docket Liquefaction Facility in the full volume LNG, LLC, at 65 (Para. 3), 68 (Mar. 13, 2017).
No. CP15–490. requested. 7 See, e.g., MARAD ROD at 16.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Jun 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_26781/page/2.svg)
![26676 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 109 / Thursday, June 8, 2017 / Notices
in a volume equivalent to approximately Floodplain Statement of Findings to intervene or protest must serve a copy
657.5 Bcf/yr of natural gas for a term of DOE prepared this Floodplain of that document on the Applicant and
20 years to commence on the earlier of Statement of Findings in accordance all the parties in this proceeding.
the date of first commercial export or with DOE’s regulations, entitled The Commission encourages
seven years from the date that the Order ‘‘Compliance with Floodplain and electronic submission of protests and
is issued. Wetland Environmental Review interventions in lieu of paper using the
Concurrently with this Record of Requirements’’ (10 CFR part 1022). The ‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov.
Decision, DOE/FE is issuing Order No. required floodplain assessment was Persons unable to file electronically
conducted during development and should submit an original and 5 copies
4028, in which it finds that the
preparation of the EIS (see Sections of the protest or intervention to the
requested authorization has not been
4.11.1 of the EIS). The EIS determined Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
shown to be inconsistent with the
that the proposed Delfin Onshore 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
public interest, and that the Application 20426.
should be granted subject to compliance Facility site is classified as having a 1-
percent-annual-chance of flooding. This filing is accessible on-line at
with the terms and conditions set forth http://www.ferc.gov, using the
in the Order, including all terms and While the placement of these facilities
within floodplains would be ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
conditions described by MARAD in its electronic review in the Commission’s
unavoidable, DOE has determined that
ROD and/or imposed in MARAD’s Public Reference Room in Washington,
the current design for the Delfin
forthcoming deepwater port license for DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on
Liquefaction Project minimizes
Delfin. Additionally, DOE/FE’s the Web site that enables subscribers to
potential harm to or in the floodplain to
authorization is conditioned on Delfin’s receive email notification when a
the extent practicable.
receipt of all connected local, state, and document is added to a subscribed
federal permits (including FERC’s Issued in Washington, DC, on June 1, 2017.
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
authorization under Section 7 of the Jarad Daniels,
Online service, please email
Natural Gas Act for the Delfin Onshore Acting Assistant Secretary, Office of Fossil FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
Facility), and on Delfin’s on-going Energy.
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
compliance with any other preventative [FR Doc. 2017–11907 Filed 6–7–17; 8:45 am]
(202) 502–8659.
and mitigative measures imposed by BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
other federal or state agencies. Time on June 23, 2017.
Basis of Decision DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Dated: June 2, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
DOE’s decision is based upon the Federal Energy Regulatory Secretary.
analysis of potential environmental Commission [FR Doc. 2017–11922 Filed 6–7–17; 8:45 am]
impacts presented in the EIS, and DOE’s
[Docket No. RM15–11–001] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
determination in Order No. 4028 that it
has not been shown that Delfin’s Reliability Standard for Transmission
proposed exports will be inconsistent System Planned Performance for DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
with the public interest, as is required Geomagnetic Disturbance Events;
to deny Delfin’s Application under NGA Notice of Filing Federal Energy Regulatory
section 3(a). Although not required by Commission
NEPA, DOE/FE also considered the Take notice that on May 30, 2017, the
Addendum, which summarizes North American Electric Reliability
Corporation submitted a preliminary [Project No. 2615–044]
available information on potential
upstream impacts associated with work plan to conduct research on topics Madison Paper Industries, Brookfield
unconventional natural gas activities, related to geomagnetic disturbances and White Pine Hydro LLC, Merimil Limited
such as hydraulic fracturing. their impacts on the reliability of the Partnership, Brassua Hydroelectric
Bulk-Power System, pursuant to Order Limited Partnership, Eagle Creek
Mitigation No. 830.1 Kennebec Hydro, LLC; Notice of
Any person desiring to intervene or to
As a condition of its decision to issue Application for Partial Transfer of
protest this filing must file in
Order No. 4028, DOE is imposing License, Substitution of Relicense
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
requirements that will avoid or Applicant, and Soliciting Comments,
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
minimize the environmental impacts of Motions To Intervene, and Protests
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
the proposed Liquefaction Facility. Protests will be considered by the On May 8, 2017, Madison Paper
These conditions include the Best Commission in determining the Industries (MPI), Brookfield White Pine
Management Practices, mitigation appropriate action to be taken, but will Hydro LLC (Brookfield), Merimil
measures, and conditions in the not serve to make protestants parties to Limited Partnership (Merimil), Brassua
MARAD ROD and forthcoming the proceeding. Any person wishing to Hydroelectric Limited Partnership
deepwater port license. Mitigation become a party must file a notice of (Brassua Partnership) (transferors/co-
measures beyond those included in intervention or motion to intervene, as
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
licensees) and Eagle Creek Kennebec
Order No. 4028 that are enforceable by appropriate. Such notices, motions, or Hydro, LLC (transferee/Eagle Creek)
other Federal and state agencies are protests must be filed on or before the filed a joint application for: (1) Partial
additional conditions of Order No. 4028. comment date. Anyone filing a motion transfer of license for the Brassua
With these conditions, DOE/FE has Storage Project, FERC No. 2615, located
determined that all practicable means to 1 Order No. 830, Reliability Standard for
on the Moose River in Somerset County,
Transmission System Planned Performance for
avoid or minimize environmental harm Geomagnetic Disturbance Events, 156 FERC
Maine and (2) substitution of Eagle
from the Delfin Liquefaction Project ¶ 61,215 (2016), reh’g denied, Order No. 830–A, 158 Creek for MPI as the applicant in the
have been adopted. FERC ¶ 61,041 (2017) (‘‘Order No. 830’’). pending application for a new license
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Jun 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM 08JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_26781/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:06:51
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:06:51
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Record of decision. | |
| Contact | To obtain additional information about the EIS or the ROD, contact Kyle W. Moorman, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Regulation and International Engagement, Office of Oil and Natural Gas, Office of Fossil Energy, Room 3E-042, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-5600, or Edward Le Duc, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Environment, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, 202- 586-4007. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 26672 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR