82_FR_26965 82 FR 26854 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of California; Coachella Valley; Attainment Plan for 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standards

82 FR 26854 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of California; Coachella Valley; Attainment Plan for 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standards

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 111 (June 12, 2017)

Page Range26854-26857
FR Document2017-12019

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of California to provide for attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or ``standards'') in the Coachella Valley nonattainment area. The EPA finds the emissions inventories to be acceptable and is approving the reasonably available control measures, transportation control strategies and measures, rate of progress and reasonable further progress demonstrations, attainment demonstration, and vehicle miles traveled offset demonstration. We have determined that motor vehicle emissions budgets are not required for the 1997 8-hour ozone standards so we are not taking final action on this portion of the plan.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26854-26857]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12019]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0244; FRL-9962-54-Region 9]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of 
California; Coachella Valley; Attainment Plan for 1997 8-Hour Ozone 
Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving state 
implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of 
California to provide for attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone national 
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or ``standards'') in the Coachella 
Valley nonattainment area. The EPA finds the emissions inventories to 
be acceptable and is approving the reasonably available control 
measures, transportation control strategies and measures, rate of 
progress and reasonable further progress demonstrations, attainment 
demonstration, and vehicle miles traveled offset demonstration. We have 
determined that motor vehicle emissions budgets are not required for 
the 1997 8-hour ozone standards so we

[[Page 26855]]

are not taking final action on this portion of the plan.

DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on July 12, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0244 
for this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are 
available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy 
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-
3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at 
the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-
volume reports), and some may not be available in either location 
(e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard 
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business 
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Kelly, Air Planning Office (AIR-
2), EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3856, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we,'' 
``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Summary of Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Summary of Proposed Action

    On November 1, 2016, the EPA proposed to approve, under section 
110(k)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), portions of several submittals 
from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as revisions to the 
California SIP for the Coachella Valley ozone nonattainment area.\1\ 81 
FR 75764. The proposal identified the following SIP submittals 
addressing the CAA planning requirements for attaining the 1997 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS for the Coachella Valley (and other areas as noted):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ For a precise description of the geographic boundaries of 
the Coachella Valley ozone nonattainment area, see 40 CFR 81.305.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     ``Final 2007 Air Quality Management Plan,'' South Coast 
Air Quality Management District, June 2007 (``2007 AQMP'');
     ``2007 State Strategy for the California State 
Implementation Plan,'' CARB, Release Date April 26, 2007, and 
Appendices A-G, CARB, Release Date May 7, 2007 (``2007 State 
Strategy'');
     ``Status Report on the State Strategy for California's 
2007 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Proposed Revision to the SIP 
Reflecting Implementation of the 2007 State Strategy,'' CARB, Release 
Date March 24, 2009 (``2009 State Strategy Status Report'');
     ``Progress Report on Implementation of PM2.5 
State Implementation Plans (SIP) for the South Coast and San Joaquin 
Valley Air Basins and Proposed SIP Revisions,'' CARB, Release Date 
March 29, 2011 (``2011 State Strategy Progress Report''); and
     ``Staff Report, Proposed Updates to the 1997 8-Hour Ozone 
Standard, State Implementation Plans; Coachella Valley and Western 
Mojave Desert,'' CARB, Release Date: September 22, 2014 (``2014 SIP 
Update'').
    We refer to these submittals collectively as the ``Coachella Valley 
Ozone Plan'' or ``Plan.''
    The Coachella Valley is classified as Severe-15 with an attainment 
date no later than June 15, 2019. See 75 FR 24409 (May 5, 2010). The 
relevant CAA requirements appear at Title I, Part D of the CAA, under 
which states must implement the 1997 8-hour ozone (primary and 
secondary) standards.\2\ The EPA codified rules for the 1997 8-hour 
ozone standards at 40 CFR part 51, subpart X. See 69 FR 23951 (April 
30, 2004); 70 FR 71612 (November 29, 2005). The EPA revoked the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS in 2015; \3\ notwithstanding this revocation, areas 
that were designated as nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS 
at the time the standards were revoked continue to be subject to 
certain SIP requirements that previously applied based on area 
classifications for the standards, under ``anti-backsliding'' 
regulations that the EPA promulgated to govern the transition from the 
1-hour ozone standards to the 8-hour ozone standards. Id. at 12296; 40 
CFR 51.1105 and 51.1100(o). Thus, in general, the Coachella Valley 
remains subject to the requirements of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS 
applicable to ``Severe'' nonattainment areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Title I, Part D of the CAA includes section 172, 
``Nonattainment Plan Provisions in General,'' and subpart 2, 
``Additional Provisions for Ozone Nonattainment Areas'' (sections 
181-185).
    \3\ 80 FR 12264 (March 6, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the November 1, 2016 proposed rule, we proposed to approve the 
following elements of the Coachella Valley Ozone Plan under applicable 
statutory and regulatory requirements: The reasonably available control 
measures (RACM) demonstration; the rate of progress (ROP) and 
reasonable further progress (RFP) demonstrations; the attainment 
demonstration; and the demonstration that the SIP provides for 
transportation control strategies and measures sufficient to offset any 
growth in emissions from growth in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) or the 
number of vehicle trips, and to provide for RFP and attainment. More 
specifically, we determined that:
     No additional RACM, beyond the controls identified in the 
2007 AQMP and 2007 State Strategy as revised by the 2009 State Strategy 
Status Report and 2011 State Strategy Progress Report, would advance 
attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone standards in the Coachella Valley 
to an attainment year of 2017. Therefore, the Coachella Valley Ozone 
Plan provides for the implementation of all RACM as required by CAA 
section 172(c)(1) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(17) (see 81 
FR 75769-72 of the proposed rule).
     The ROP and RFP demonstrations in the 2014 SIP Update meet 
the requirements of CAA sections 172(c)(2) and 182(c)(2)(B) and 40 CFR 
51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(4) (see 81 FR 75774-76 of the proposed 
rule).
     The air quality modeling in the 2007 AQMP is adequate to 
support the attainment date of June 15, 2019 (attainment year 2018), 
and the 2007 AQMP's attainment demonstration meets the requirements of 
CAA section 182(c)(2)(A) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.100(o)(12) 
(see 81 FR 75772-73 of the proposed rule and the Technical Support 
Document (TSD) for the proposal \4\).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ This document is available online at www.regulations.gov in 
the docket EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0244, or from the EPA contact listed at 
the beginning of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Appendices D and E of the 2014 SIP Update demonstrate that 
the State has adopted sufficient transportation control strategies and 
measures to offset any growth in emissions from increasing VMT and 
vehicle trips in Coachella Valley, and complies with the VMT emissions 
offset requirement in CAA section 182(d)(1)(A) and 51.1105(a)(1) and 
51.1100(o)(10) (see 81 FR 75777-79 of the proposed rule).
    We also proposed to approve updated motor vehicle emission budgets 
(MVEBs) for transportation conformity included in the 2014 SIP Update. 
See 81 FR 75776-77 of the proposed rule. Additionally, although 
emissions inventories are not a specific requirement under the anti-
backsliding provisions, we found that the baseline and milestone year 
emissions inventories were adequate to support the other elements of 
the Coachella Valley Ozone Plan, including the RACM, RFP, ROP and 
attainment

[[Page 26856]]

demonstrations. See 81 FR 75768-69 of the proposed rule. We did not 
propose any action on the Coachella Valley Ozone Plan's contingency 
measures. The EPA's analysis and findings supporting our proposed 
actions are summarized in our proposal and are also discussed in the 
TSD for the proposal.
    In today's action, the EPA is finalizing all actions from the 
proposal, with the sole exception that we are not finalizing approval 
of the MVEBs in the 2014 SIP Update. As discussed further below, the 
MVEBs are not a continuing applicable requirement for the Coachella 
Valley under the EPA's anti-backsliding regulations, and our approval 
of the MVEBs is therefore not required under the CAA.

II. Public Comments

    The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. 
We received no substantive adverse comments during this period.

III. Final Action

    For the reasons discussed in our November 1, 2016 proposal and 
summarized above, the EPA is approving, under CAA section 110(k)(3), 
most elements of the Coachella Valley Ozone Plan as proposed. 
Specifically, the EPA is taking final action to approve the following 
the following elements as meeting the specified requirements for the 
revoked 1997 8-hour ozone standards:
     The RACM demonstration as meeting the requirements of CAA 
section 172(c)(1) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(17).
     the ROP and RFP demonstrations as meeting the requirements 
of CAA sections 172(c)(2) and 182(c)(2)(B) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 
51.1100(o)(4).
     the attainment demonstration as meeting the requirements 
of CAA section 182(c)(2)(A) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 
51.1100(o)(12).
     the demonstration that the SIP provides for transportation 
control strategies and measures sufficient to offset any growth in 
emissions from growth in VMT or the number of vehicle trips, and to 
provide for RFP and attainment, as meeting the requirements of CAA 
section 182(d)(1)(A) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(10).
    As noted in our proposal, we are not acting on the Plan's 
contingency measures. Contingency measures are a distinct provision of 
the CAA that we may act on separately from the attainment requirements.
    Upon further reflection, we are not finalizing our proposed 
approval of the MVEBs in the 2014 SIP Update. The CAA requires 
transportation conformity only in areas that are designated 
nonattainment or maintenance. Since the revocation of the 1997 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS, transportation conformity no longer applies to the 
Coachella Valley with respect to the revoked standards. 80 FR 12264, 
12284 (March 6, 2015). Therefore, we have determined that it is not 
necessary to approve these budgets, given that they were developed for 
the now-revoked 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. However, consistent with the 
EPA's transportation conformity rule,\5\ the MVEBs from CARB's 2008 
Ozone Early Progress Plan \6\ will remain in effect for the Coachella 
Valley until emission budgets are established and found adequate or are 
approved for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 40 CFR part 93, subpart A.
    \6\ ``Early Progress Plans Demonstrating Progress Toward 
Attaining the 8-hour National Air Quality Standards for Ozone and 
Setting Transportation Conformity Budgets for Ventura County, 
Antelope Valley--Western Mojave Desert, Coachella Valley, Eastern 
Kern County, and Imperial County'' (revised), CARB (February 27, 
2008). The EPA previously determined that the budgets in the Ozone 
Early Progress Plan are adequate for transportation conformity 
purposes. See 73 FR 25694 (May 7, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In this action, we are also amending 40 CFR 52.220 to clarify the 
scope of an earlier partial approval of the 2007 AQMP. In 2011, we 
approved portions of the 2007 AQMP as providing for attainment of the 
1997 fine particulate matter NAAQS in the Los Angeles-South Coast area. 
76 FR 69928 (November 9, 2011). However, the regulatory text that we 
adopted in that action did not specify that our approval extended only 
to those portions of the 2007 AQMP that CARB had submitted to us as SIP 
revisions,\7\ and only to those portions of the submitted material 
specified for approval in the preamble to that rulemaking. Today's 
action corrects the regulatory text to reflect that portions of the 
2007 AQMP were excluded from the 2011 approval, including a portion 
applicable to the Coachella Valley that we are approving in today's 
action, and does not affect the substance of our prior final action, 76 
FR 69928 (November 9, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See CARB Resolution 07-41 (September 27, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or 
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible 
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must

[[Page 26857]]

submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House 
of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. 
The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 
60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is 
not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 11, 2017. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for 
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness 
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in 
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental regulations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: April 20, 2017.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(398)(ii)(A)(1) 
and adding paragraphs (c)(398)(ii)(A)(4) and (c)(486) to read as read 
as follows:


Sec.  [thinsp]52.220  Identification of plan--in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (398) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (1) Final South Coast 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (excluding 
those portions of Chapter 4 (``AQMP Control Strategy'') and Chapter 7 
(``Implementation'') addressing District-recommended measures for 
adoption by CARB and references to those measures (pp. 4-43 through 4-
54 and the section titled ``Recommended Mobile Source and Clean Fuel 
Control Measures'' in table 7-3, pp. 7-8 and 7-9); those portions of 
Chapter 6 (``Clean Air Act Requirements'') and Chapter 7 
(``Implementation'') addressing California Clean Air Act Requirements 
(pp. 6-13 through 6-22 and page 7-3); those portions of Chapter 4 
(``AQMP Control Strategy'') addressing emission and risk reduction 
goals identified in the AQMP's proposed control measure MOB-03 
(``Proposed Backstop Measures for Indirect Sources of Emissions from 
Ports and Port-Related Facilities'') (p. 4-24); the motor vehicle 
emissions budgets in Chapter 6 (``Clean Air Act Requirements'') (pp. 6-
24 through 6-26), and Chapter 8 (``Future Air Quality--Desert 
Nonattainment Areas'')), adopted on June 1, 2007.
* * * * *
    (4) Final South Coast 2007 Air Quality Management Plan, Chapter 8 
(``Future Air Quality--Desert Nonattainment Areas'') (excluding pp. 8-
14 to 8-17 (regarding transportation conformity budgets)), adopted on 
June 1, 2007.a
* * * * *
    (486) The following plan was submitted on November 6, 2014, by the 
Governor's designee.
    (i) [Reserved]
    (ii) Additional materials. (A) California Air Resources Board.
    (1) California Air Resources Board, Staff Report, Proposed Updates 
to the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard, State Implementation Plans; 
Coachella Valley and Western Mojave Desert (excluding section III (pp. 
8-12), Table A-2, Table B-2, Table C-2, the bottom row of Table E-1, 
Table E-3 and accompanying discussion of Western Mojave Desert ROG 
calculations on p. E-7, and Figure E-2 (regarding Western Mojave 
Desert); Table B-3 (regarding contingency measures); and Appendix D 
(regarding transportation conformity budgets)), adopted on October 24, 
2014.

[FR Doc. 2017-12019 Filed 6-9-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                             26854                  Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

                                             § 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation,                         (d) * * *
                                             and related services, special services, and
                                             services performed by the Licensing
                                             Division.
                                             *       *       *        *       *

                                             (5) Secure test examining fee (per staff member per hour) ...............................................................................................................      250



                                             *       *       *        *       *                              Document Format (PDF). The Copyright                                (vi) Tests. In the case of tests, and
                                                                                                             Office will review these materials to                             answer material for tests, published
                                             PART 202—PREREGISTRATION AND                                    determine if the work qualifies for the                           separately from other literary works, the
                                             REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO                                       secure test procedure. If the work                                deposit of one complete copy will
                                             COPYRIGHT                                                       appears to be eligible, the Copyright                             suffice in lieu of two copies. In the case
                                                                                                             Office will contact the applicant to                              of any secure test the applicant may
                                             ■ 3. The authority citation for part 202
                                                                                                             schedule an appointment to examine an                             submit identifying material in lieu of
                                             continues to read as follows:
                                                                                                             unredacted copy of the test under secure                          one complete copy if the conditions set
                                                 Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408(f), 702.                           conditions.                                                       forth in § 202.13(c) have been met.
                                             ■   4. Add § 202.13 to read as follows:                            (4) On the appointed date, the                                 *     *      *    *     *
                                                                                                             applicant must bring the following
                                             § 202.13     Secure tests.                                                                                                           Dated: May 19, 2017.
                                                                                                             materials to the Copyright Office:
                                               (a) General. This section prescribes                             (i) A copy of the completed                                    Karyn Temple Claggett,
                                             rules pertaining to the registration of                         application.                                                      Acting Register of Copyrights and Director
                                             secure tests.                                                      (ii) The appropriate examination fee,                          of the U.S. Copyright Office.
                                               (b) Definitions. For purposes of this                         as required by § 201.3(d) of this chapter.                        Approved by:
                                             section—                                                           (iii) A copy of the redacted version of                        Carla D. Hayden,
                                                (1) A secure test is a nonmarketed test                      the secure test that was uploaded to the
                                             administered under supervision at                                                                                                 Librarian of Congress.
                                                                                                             electronic registration system.
                                             specified centers on scheduled dates, all                          (iv) A signed declaration confirming                           [FR Doc. 2017–12021 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
                                             copies of which are accounted for and                           that the redacted copy specified in                               BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
                                             either destroyed or returned to restricted                      paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of this section is
                                             locked storage following each                                   identical to the redacted copy that was
                                             administration.                                                 uploaded to the electronic registration                           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                                (2) A test is nonmarketed if copies of                       system.                                                           AGENCY
                                             the test are not sold, but instead are                             (v) An unredacted copy of the entire
                                             distributed and used in such a manner                           secure test.                                                      40 CFR Part 52
                                             that the test sponsor or publisher retains                         (5) The Copyright Office will examine                          [EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0244; FRL–9962–54–
                                             ownership and control of the copies.                            the copies specified in paragraphs                                Region 9]
                                                (3) A test is administered under                             (c)(4)(iii) and (v) of this section in the
                                             supervision if test proctors or the                             applicant’s presence. When the                                    Approval and Promulgation of
                                             equivalent supervise the administration                         examination is complete, the Office will                          Implementation Plans; State of
                                             of the test.                                                    stamp the date of the appointment on                              California; Coachella Valley;
                                                (4) A specified center is a place where                      the copies and will return them to the                            Attainment Plan for 1997 8-Hour Ozone
                                             test takers are physically assembled at                         applicant. The Office will retain the                             Standards
                                             the same time.                                                  signed declaration and the redacted
                                                (c) Deposit requirements. Pursuant to                        copy that was uploaded to the electronic                          AGENCY:  Environmental Protection
                                             the authority granted by 17 U.S.C.                              registration system.                                              Agency (EPA).
                                             408(c)(1), the Register of Copyrights has                       ■ 5. Amend § 202.20 as follows:                                   ACTION: Final rule.
                                             determined that a secure test may be                            ■ a. Revise paragraph (b)(3).;
                                             registered with identifying material, if                                                                                          SUMMARY:   The Environmental Protection
                                                                                                             ■ b. Remove paragraph (b)(4);
                                             the following conditions are met:                                                                                                 Agency (EPA) is approving state
                                                                                                             ■ c. Redesignate paragraphs (b)(5) and
                                                (1) The applicant must complete and                                                                                            implementation plan (SIP) revisions
                                                                                                             (6) as paragraphs (b)(4) and (5),
                                             submit a standard application. The                                                                                                submitted by the State of California to
                                                                                                             respectively;
                                             application may be submitted by any of                          ■ d. Remove ‘‘, as amended by Pub. L.
                                                                                                                                                                               provide for attainment of the 1997 8-
                                             the parties listed in § 202.3(c)(1).                            94–553’’ from newly redesignated                                  hour ozone national ambient air quality
                                                (2) The appropriate filing fee, as                           paragraph (b)(4) and add a period in its                          standards (NAAQS or ‘‘standards’’) in
                                             required by § 201.3(c) of this chapter,                         place; and                                                        the Coachella Valley nonattainment
                                             must be included with the application                           ■ e. Revise paragraph (c)(2)(vi).
                                                                                                                                                                               area. The EPA finds the emissions
                                             or charged to an active deposit account.                          The revisions read as follows:                                  inventories to be acceptable and is
                                                (3) The applicant must submit a                                                                                                approving the reasonably available
                                             redacted copy of the entire secure test.                        § 202.20 Deposit of copies and                                    control measures, transportation control
                                             In addition, the applicant must                                 phonorecords for copyright registration.                          strategies and measures, rate of progress
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                             complete and submit the questionnaire                           *     *    *    *      *                                          and reasonable further progress
                                             that is posted on the Copyright Office’s                          (b) * * *                                                       demonstrations, attainment
                                             Web site. The questionnaire and the                               (3) The term secure test has the                                demonstration, and vehicle miles
                                             redacted copy must be contained in                              meaning set forth in § 202.13(b).                                 traveled offset demonstration. We have
                                             separate electronic files, and each file                        *     *    *    *      *                                          determined that motor vehicle
                                             must be uploaded to the electronic                                (c) * * *                                                       emissions budgets are not required for
                                             registration system in Portable                                   (2) * * *                                                       the 1997 8-hour ozone standards so we


                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014      15:07 Jun 09, 2017     Jkt 241001    PO 00000     Frm 00012      Fmt 4700    Sfmt 4700     E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM         12JNR1


                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                                26855

                                             are not taking final action on this                     Proposed Revision to the SIP Reflecting                 demonstration that the SIP provides for
                                             portion of the plan.                                    Implementation of the 2007 State                        transportation control strategies and
                                             DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is               Strategy,’’ CARB, Release Date March                    measures sufficient to offset any growth
                                             effective on July 12, 2017.                             24, 2009 (‘‘2009 State Strategy Status                  in emissions from growth in vehicle
                                             ADDRESSES: The EPA has established                      Report’’);                                              miles traveled (VMT) or the number of
                                             docket number EPA–R09–OAR–2016–                            • ‘‘Progress Report on                               vehicle trips, and to provide for RFP
                                             0244 for this action. Generally,                        Implementation of PM2.5 State                           and attainment. More specifically, we
                                             documents in the docket for this action                 Implementation Plans (SIP) for the                      determined that:
                                             are available electronically at http://                 South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Air                     • No additional RACM, beyond the
                                             www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at                  Basins and Proposed SIP Revisions,’’                    controls identified in the 2007 AQMP
                                             EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,                     CARB, Release Date March 29, 2011                       and 2007 State Strategy as revised by
                                             San Francisco, California 94105–3901.                   (‘‘2011 State Strategy Progress Report’’);              the 2009 State Strategy Status Report
                                             While all documents in the docket are                   and                                                     and 2011 State Strategy Progress Report,
                                             listed at http://www.regulations.gov,                      • ‘‘Staff Report, Proposed Updates to                would advance attainment of the 1997
                                             some information may be publicly                        the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard, State                   8-hour ozone standards in the Coachella
                                             available only at the hard copy location                Implementation Plans; Coachella Valley                  Valley to an attainment year of 2017.
                                             (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps,                and Western Mojave Desert,’’ CARB,                      Therefore, the Coachella Valley Ozone
                                             multi-volume reports), and some may                     Release Date: September 22, 2014                        Plan provides for the implementation of
                                             not be available in either location (e.g.,              (‘‘2014 SIP Update’’).                                  all RACM as required by CAA section
                                             confidential business information                          We refer to these submittals                         172(c)(1) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and
                                             (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy                        collectively as the ‘‘Coachella Valley                  51.1100(o)(17) (see 81 FR 75769–72 of
                                             materials, please schedule an                           Ozone Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan.’’                               the proposed rule).
                                             appointment during normal business                         The Coachella Valley is classified as                   • The ROP and RFP demonstrations
                                             hours with the contact listed in the FOR                Severe-15 with an attainment date no                    in the 2014 SIP Update meet the
                                             FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.                    later than June 15, 2019. See 75 FR                     requirements of CAA sections 172(c)(2)
                                             FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom                    24409 (May 5, 2010). The relevant CAA                   and 182(c)(2)(B) and 40 CFR
                                             Kelly, Air Planning Office (AIR–2), EPA                 requirements appear at Title I, Part D of               51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(4) (see 81
                                             Region IX, (415) 972–3856,                              the CAA, under which states must                        FR 75774–76 of the proposed rule).
                                                                                                     implement the 1997 8-hour ozone                            • The air quality modeling in the
                                             kelly.thomasp@epa.gov.
                                                                                                     (primary and secondary) standards.2                     2007 AQMP is adequate to support the
                                             SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                     The EPA codified rules for the 1997 8-                  attainment date of June 15, 2019
                                             Throughout this document, the terms                                                                             (attainment year 2018), and the 2007
                                                                                                     hour ozone standards at 40 CFR part 51,
                                             ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.                                                                   AQMP’s attainment demonstration
                                                                                                     subpart X. See 69 FR 23951 (April 30,
                                             Table of Contents                                       2004); 70 FR 71612 (November 29,                        meets the requirements of CAA section
                                                                                                     2005). The EPA revoked the 1997 8-hour                  182(c)(2)(A) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1)
                                             I. Summary of Proposed Action
                                             II. Public Comments                                     ozone NAAQS in 2015; 3                                  and 51.100(o)(12) (see 81 FR 75772–73
                                             III. Final Action                                       notwithstanding this revocation, areas                  of the proposed rule and the Technical
                                             IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews               that were designated as nonattainment                   Support Document (TSD) for the
                                                                                                     for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS at the                  proposal 4).
                                             I. Summary of Proposed Action                           time the standards were revoked                            • Appendices D and E of the 2014 SIP
                                                On November 1, 2016, the EPA                         continue to be subject to certain SIP                   Update demonstrate that the State has
                                             proposed to approve, under section                      requirements that previously applied                    adopted sufficient transportation control
                                             110(k)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA),                   based on area classifications for the                   strategies and measures to offset any
                                             portions of several submittals from the                 standards, under ‘‘anti-backsliding’’                   growth in emissions from increasing
                                             California Air Resources Board (CARB)                   regulations that the EPA promulgated to                 VMT and vehicle trips in Coachella
                                             as revisions to the California SIP for the              govern the transition from the 1-hour                   Valley, and complies with the VMT
                                             Coachella Valley ozone nonattainment                    ozone standards to the 8-hour ozone                     emissions offset requirement in CAA
                                             area.1 81 FR 75764. The proposal                        standards. Id. at 12296; 40 CFR 51.1105                 section 182(d)(1)(A) and 51.1105(a)(1)
                                             identified the following SIP submittals                 and 51.1100(o). Thus, in general, the                   and 51.1100(o)(10) (see 81 FR 75777–79
                                             addressing the CAA planning                             Coachella Valley remains subject to the                 of the proposed rule).
                                             requirements for attaining the 1997 8-                  requirements of the 1997 8-hour ozone                      We also proposed to approve updated
                                             hour ozone NAAQS for the Coachella                      NAAQS applicable to ‘‘Severe’’                          motor vehicle emission budgets
                                             Valley (and other areas as noted):                      nonattainment areas.                                    (MVEBs) for transportation conformity
                                                • ‘‘Final 2007 Air Quality                              In the November 1, 2016 proposed                     included in the 2014 SIP Update. See 81
                                             Management Plan,’’ South Coast Air                      rule, we proposed to approve the                        FR 75776–77 of the proposed rule.
                                             Quality Management District, June 2007                  following elements of the Coachella                     Additionally, although emissions
                                             (‘‘2007 AQMP’’);                                        Valley Ozone Plan under applicable                      inventories are not a specific
                                                • ‘‘2007 State Strategy for the                      statutory and regulatory requirements:                  requirement under the anti-backsliding
                                             California State Implementation Plan,’’                 The reasonably available control                        provisions, we found that the baseline
                                             CARB, Release Date April 26, 2007, and                  measures (RACM) demonstration; the                      and milestone year emissions
                                             Appendices A–G, CARB, Release Date                      rate of progress (ROP) and reasonable                   inventories were adequate to support
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                             May 7, 2007 (‘‘2007 State Strategy’’);                  further progress (RFP) demonstrations;                  the other elements of the Coachella
                                                • ‘‘Status Report on the State Strategy              the attainment demonstration; and the                   Valley Ozone Plan, including the
                                             for California’s 2007 State                                                                                     RACM, RFP, ROP and attainment
                                             Implementation Plan (SIP) and                              2 Title I, Part D of the CAA includes section 172,

                                                                                                     ‘‘Nonattainment Plan Provisions in General,’’ and         4 This document is available online at
                                               1 Fora precise description of the geographic          subpart 2, ‘‘Additional Provisions for Ozone            www.regulations.gov in the docket EPA–R09–OAR–
                                             boundaries of the Coachella Valley ozone                Nonattainment Areas’’ (sections 181–185).               2016–0244, or from the EPA contact listed at the
                                             nonattainment area, see 40 CFR 81.305.                     3 80 FR 12264 (March 6, 2015).                       beginning of this notice.



                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:07 Jun 09, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00013   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM   12JNR1


                                             26856               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

                                             demonstrations. See 81 FR 75768–69 of                   CAA requires transportation conformity                 they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
                                             the proposed rule. We did not propose                   only in areas that are designated                      Act. Accordingly, this action merely
                                             any action on the Coachella Valley                      nonattainment or maintenance. Since                    approves state law as meeting federal
                                             Ozone Plan’s contingency measures.                      the revocation of the 1997 8-hour ozone                requirements and does not impose
                                             The EPA’s analysis and findings                         NAAQS, transportation conformity no                    additional requirements beyond those
                                             supporting our proposed actions are                     longer applies to the Coachella Valley                 imposed by state law. For that reason,
                                             summarized in our proposal and are                      with respect to the revoked standards.                 this action:
                                             also discussed in the TSD for the                       80 FR 12264, 12284 (March 6, 2015).                       • Is not a significant regulatory action
                                             proposal.                                               Therefore, we have determined that it is               subject to review by the Office of
                                                In today’s action, the EPA is finalizing             not necessary to approve these budgets,                Management and Budget under
                                             all actions from the proposal, with the                 given that they were developed for the                 Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
                                             sole exception that we are not finalizing               now-revoked 1997 8-hour ozone                          October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
                                             approval of the MVEBs in the 2014 SIP                   NAAQS. However, consistent with the                    January 21, 2011);
                                             Update. As discussed further below, the                 EPA’s transportation conformity rule,5                    • does not impose an information
                                             MVEBs are not a continuing applicable                   the MVEBs from CARB’s 2008 Ozone                       collection burden under the provisions
                                             requirement for the Coachella Valley                    Early Progress Plan 6 will remain in                   of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
                                             under the EPA’s anti-backsliding                        effect for the Coachella Valley until                  U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
                                             regulations, and our approval of the                    emission budgets are established and                      • is certified as not having a
                                             MVEBs is therefore not required under                   found adequate or are approved for the                 significant economic impact on a
                                             the CAA.                                                2008 ozone NAAQS.                                      substantial number of small entities
                                                                                                        In this action, we are also amending                under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
                                             II. Public Comments                                     40 CFR 52.220 to clarify the scope of an               U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
                                                The EPA’s proposed action provided                   earlier partial approval of the 2007                      • does not contain any unfunded
                                             a 30-day public comment period. We                      AQMP. In 2011, we approved portions                    mandate or significantly or uniquely
                                             received no substantive adverse                         of the 2007 AQMP as providing for                      affect small governments, as described
                                             comments during this period.                            attainment of the 1997 fine particulate                in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
                                                                                                     matter NAAQS in the Los Angeles-                       of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
                                             III. Final Action                                                                                                 • does not have Federalism
                                                                                                     South Coast area. 76 FR 69928
                                                For the reasons discussed in our                     (November 9, 2011). However, the                       implications as specified in Executive
                                             November 1, 2016 proposal and                           regulatory text that we adopted in that                Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
                                             summarized above, the EPA is                            action did not specify that our approval               1999);
                                             approving, under CAA section 110(k)(3),                 extended only to those portions of the                    • is not an economically significant
                                             most elements of the Coachella Valley                   2007 AQMP that CARB had submitted                      regulatory action based on health or
                                             Ozone Plan as proposed. Specifically,                   to us as SIP revisions,7 and only to those             safety risks subject to Executive Order
                                             the EPA is taking final action to approve               portions of the submitted material                     13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
                                             the following the following elements as                 specified for approval in the preamble                    • is not a significant regulatory action
                                             meeting the specified requirements for                  to that rulemaking. Today’s action                     subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
                                             the revoked 1997 8-hour ozone                           corrects the regulatory text to reflect that           28355, May 22, 2001);
                                             standards:                                              portions of the 2007 AQMP were                            • is not subject to requirements of
                                                • The RACM demonstration as                          excluded from the 2011 approval,                       Section 12(d) of the National
                                             meeting the requirements of CAA                         including a portion applicable to the                  Technology Transfer and Advancement
                                             section 172(c)(1) and 40 CFR                            Coachella Valley that we are approving                 Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
                                             51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(17).                       in today’s action, and does not affect the             application of those requirements would
                                                • the ROP and RFP demonstrations as                  substance of our prior final action, 76                be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
                                             meeting the requirements of CAA                         FR 69928 (November 9, 2011).                           and
                                             sections 172(c)(2) and 182(c)(2)(B) and                                                                           • does not provide the EPA with the
                                             40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(4).                 IV. Statutory and Executive Order                      discretionary authority to address, as
                                                • the attainment demonstration as                    Reviews                                                appropriate, disproportionate human
                                             meeting the requirements of CAA                           Under the Clean Air Act, the                         health or environmental effects, using
                                             section 182(c)(2)(A) and 40 CFR                         Administrator is required to approve a                 practicable and legally permissible
                                             51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(12).                       SIP submission that complies with the                  methods, under Executive Order 12898
                                                • the demonstration that the SIP                     provisions of the Act and applicable                   (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
                                             provides for transportation control                     federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);                   In addition, the SIP is not approved
                                             strategies and measures sufficient to                   40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP                to apply on any Indian reservation land
                                             offset any growth in emissions from                     submissions, the EPA’s role is to                      or in any other area where the EPA or
                                             growth in VMT or the number of vehicle                  approve state choices, provided that                   an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
                                             trips, and to provide for RFP and                                                                              tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
                                             attainment, as meeting the requirements                   5 40  CFR part 93, subpart A.                        Indian country, the rule does not have
                                             of CAA section 182(d)(1)(A) and 40 CFR                    6 ‘‘EarlyProgress Plans Demonstrating Progress       tribal implications and will not impose
                                             51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(10).                       Toward Attaining the 8-hour National Air Quality       substantial direct costs on tribal
                                                As noted in our proposal, we are not                 Standards for Ozone and Setting Transportation         governments or preempt tribal law as
                                                                                                     Conformity Budgets for Ventura County, Antelope
                                             acting on the Plan’s contingency                                                                               specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                                                                                     Valley—Western Mojave Desert, Coachella Valley,
                                             measures. Contingency measures are a                    Eastern Kern County, and Imperial County’’             FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
                                             distinct provision of the CAA that we                   (revised), CARB (February 27, 2008). The EPA              The Congressional Review Act, 5
                                             may act on separately from the                          previously determined that the budgets in the          U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
                                                                                                     Ozone Early Progress Plan are adequate for             Business Regulatory Enforcement
                                             attainment requirements.                                transportation conformity purposes. See 73 FR
                                                Upon further reflection, we are not                  25694 (May 7, 2008).                                   Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
                                             finalizing our proposed approval of the                    7 See CARB Resolution 07–41 (September 27,          that before a rule may take effect, the
                                             MVEBs in the 2014 SIP Update. The                       2007).                                                 agency promulgating the rule must


                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:07 Jun 09, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00014   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM   12JNR1


                                                                   Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                            26857

                                             submit a rule report, which includes a                       (A) * * *                                           FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
                                             copy of the rule, to each House of the                       (1) Final South Coast 2007 Air Quality              COMMISSION
                                             Congress and to the Comptroller General                   Management Plan (excluding those
                                             of the United States. The EPA will                                                                               47 CFR Part 96
                                                                                                       portions of Chapter 4 (‘‘AQMP Control
                                             submit a report containing this action                    Strategy’’) and Chapter 7                              [GN Docket No. 12–354; FCC 16–55]
                                             and other required information to the
                                                                                                       (‘‘Implementation’’) addressing District-
                                             U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of                                                                                   Amendment of the Commission’s
                                                                                                       recommended measures for adoption by
                                             Representatives, and the Comptroller                                                                             Rules With Regard to Commercial
                                             General of the United States prior to                     CARB and references to those measures
                                                                                                                                                              Operations in the 3550–3650 MHz Band
                                             publication of the rule in the Federal                    (pp. 4–43 through 4–54 and the section
                                             Register. A major rule cannot take effect                 titled ‘‘Recommended Mobile Source                     AGENCY:   Federal Communications
                                             until 60 days after it is published in the                and Clean Fuel Control Measures’’ in                   Commission.
                                             Federal Register. This action is not a                    table 7–3, pp. 7–8 and 7–9); those                     ACTION: Final rule; announcement of
                                             ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.                     portions of Chapter 6 (‘‘Clean Air Act                 effective date.
                                             804(2).                                                   Requirements’’) and Chapter 7
                                                Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean                   (‘‘Implementation’’) addressing                        SUMMARY:   In this document, the Federal
                                             Air Act, petitions for judicial review of                 California Clean Air Act Requirements                  Communications Commission
                                             this action must be filed in the United                   (pp. 6–13 through 6–22 and page 7–3);                  (Commission) announces that the Office
                                             States Court of Appeals for the                           those portions of Chapter 4 (‘‘AQMP                    of Management and Budget (OMB) has
                                             appropriate circuit by August 11, 2017.                                                                          approved, for a period of three years, the
                                                                                                       Control Strategy’’) addressing emission
                                             Filing a petition for reconsideration by                                                                         information collection requirements
                                                                                                       and risk reduction goals identified in
                                             the Administrator of this final rule does                                                                        associated with the Commission’s
                                                                                                       the AQMP’s proposed control measure
                                             not affect the finality of this action for                                                                       Second Report and Order, GN Docket
                                                                                                       MOB–03 (‘‘Proposed Backstop Measures                   No. 12–354, FCC 16–55. This document
                                             the purposes of judicial review nor does                  for Indirect Sources of Emissions from
                                             it extend the time within which a                                                                                is consistent with the Second Report
                                                                                                       Ports and Port-Related Facilities’’) (p. 4–            and Order, which stated that the
                                             petition for judicial review may be filed,                24); the motor vehicle emissions
                                             and shall not postpone the effectiveness                                                                         Commission would publish a document
                                                                                                       budgets in Chapter 6 (‘‘Clean Air Act                  in the Federal Register announcing
                                             of such rule or action. This action may                   Requirements’’) (pp. 6–24 through 6–
                                             not be challenged later in proceedings to                                                                        OMB approval and the effective date of
                                                                                                       26), and Chapter 8 (‘‘Future Air                       the requirements.
                                             enforce its requirements (see section                     Quality—Desert Nonattainment
                                             307(b)(2)).                                                                                                      DATES: The amendments to 47 CFR
                                                                                                       Areas’’)), adopted on June 1, 2007.                    96.25(c)(1)(i), published at 81 FR 49023,
                                             List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52                        *       *    *    *     *                              July 26, 2016, are effective on July 3,
                                               Environmental protection, Air                              (4) Final South Coast 2007 Air Quality              2017.
                                             pollution control, Incorporation by                       Management Plan, Chapter 8 (‘‘Future                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:         For
                                             reference, Intergovernmental                              Air Quality—Desert Nonattainment                       additional information, contact Cathy
                                             regulations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,                     Areas’’) (excluding pp. 8–14 to 8–17                   Williams, Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov, (202)
                                             Reporting and recordkeeping                               (regarding transportation conformity                   418–2918.
                                             requirements, Volatile organic                            budgets)), adopted on June 1, 2007.a                   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
                                             compounds.                                                                                                       document announces that, on May 11,
                                                                                                       *       *    *    *     *
                                                 Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.                                                                            2017, OMB approved the revised
                                                                                                          (486) The following plan was                        information collection requirements
                                               Dated: April 20, 2017.
                                                                                                       submitted on November 6, 2014, by the                  contained in the Commission’s Second
                                             Alexis Strauss,                                           Governor’s designee.
                                             Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
                                                                                                                                                              Report and Order, FCC 16–55,
                                                                                                          (i) [Reserved]                                      published at 81 FR 49023, July 26, 2016.
                                               Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code                                                                       The OMB Control Number is 3060–
                                             of Federal Regulations is amended as                         (ii) Additional materials. (A)
                                                                                                       California Air Resources Board.                        1211. The Commission publishes this
                                             follows:                                                                                                         document as an announcement of the
                                                                                                          (1) California Air Resources Board,                 effective date of the requirements. If you
                                             PART 52—APPROVAL AND                                      Staff Report, Proposed Updates to the                  have any comments on the burden
                                             PROMULGATION OF                                           1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard, State                      estimates listed below, or how the
                                             IMPLEMENTATION PLANS                                      Implementation Plans; Coachella Valley                 Commission can improve the
                                             ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52                   and Western Mojave Desert (excluding                   collections and reduce any burdens
                                             continues to read as follows:                             section III (pp. 8–12), Table A–2, Table               caused thereby, please contact Cathy
                                                                                                       B–2, Table C–2, the bottom row of Table                Williams, Federal Communications
                                                 Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.                     E–1, Table E–3 and accompanying                        Commission, Room 1–C823, 445 12th
                                             Subpart F—California                                      discussion of Western Mojave Desert                    Street SW., Washington, DC 20554.
                                                                                                       ROG calculations on p. E–7, and Figure                 Please include the OMB Control
                                             ■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by                         E–2 (regarding Western Mojave Desert);                 Number, 3060–1211 in your
                                             revising paragraph (c)(398)(ii)(A)(1) and                 Table B–3 (regarding contingency                       correspondence. The Commission will
                                             adding paragraphs (c)(398)(ii)(A)(4) and                  measures); and Appendix D (regarding                   also accept your comments via email at
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                             (c)(486) to read as read as follows:                      transportation conformity budgets)),                   PRA@fcc.gov.
                                                                                                       adopted on October 24, 2014.                              To request materials in accessible
                                             § 52.220       Identification of plan—in part.                                                                   formats for people with disabilities
                                                                                                       [FR Doc. 2017–12019 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
                                             *        *      *      *      *                                                                                  (Braille, large print, electronic files,
                                                                                                       BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                 (c) * *    *                                                                                                 audio format), send an email to fcc504@
                                                 (398) *    * *                                                                                               fcc.gov or call the Consumer and
                                                 (ii) * *   *                                                                                                 Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)


                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014     15:07 Jun 09, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00015   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM   12JNR1



Document Created: 2017-06-10 01:40:46
Document Modified: 2017-06-10 01:40:46
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesEffective Date: This final rule is effective on July 12, 2017.
ContactTom Kelly, Air Planning Office (AIR- 2), EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3856, [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 26854 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Regulations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR