82 FR 26854 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of California; Coachella Valley; Attainment Plan for 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standards
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 111 (June 12, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 111 (June 12, 2017)
| Page Range | 26854-26857 | |
| FR Document | 2017-12019 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 26854-26857] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-12019] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0244; FRL-9962-54-Region 9] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of California; Coachella Valley; Attainment Plan for 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standards AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of California to provide for attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or ``standards'') in the Coachella Valley nonattainment area. The EPA finds the emissions inventories to be acceptable and is approving the reasonably available control measures, transportation control strategies and measures, rate of progress and reasonable further progress demonstrations, attainment demonstration, and vehicle miles traveled offset demonstration. We have determined that motor vehicle emissions budgets are not required for the 1997 8-hour ozone standards so we [[Page 26855]] are not taking final action on this portion of the plan. DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on July 12, 2017. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0244 for this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105- 3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi- volume reports), and some may not be available in either location (e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Kelly, Air Planning Office (AIR- 2), EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3856, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. Summary of Proposed Action II. Public Comments III. Final Action IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Summary of Proposed Action On November 1, 2016, the EPA proposed to approve, under section 110(k)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), portions of several submittals from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as revisions to the California SIP for the Coachella Valley ozone nonattainment area.\1\ 81 FR 75764. The proposal identified the following SIP submittals addressing the CAA planning requirements for attaining the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Coachella Valley (and other areas as noted): --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ For a precise description of the geographic boundaries of the Coachella Valley ozone nonattainment area, see 40 CFR 81.305. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------``Final 2007 Air Quality Management Plan,'' South Coast Air Quality Management District, June 2007 (``2007 AQMP''); ``2007 State Strategy for the California State Implementation Plan,'' CARB, Release Date April 26, 2007, and Appendices A-G, CARB, Release Date May 7, 2007 (``2007 State Strategy''); ``Status Report on the State Strategy for California's 2007 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Proposed Revision to the SIP Reflecting Implementation of the 2007 State Strategy,'' CARB, Release Date March 24, 2009 (``2009 State Strategy Status Report''); ``Progress Report on Implementation of PM 2.5 State Implementation Plans (SIP) for the South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Air Basins and Proposed SIP Revisions,'' CARB, Release Date March 29, 2011 (``2011 State Strategy Progress Report''); and``Staff Report, Proposed Updates to the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard, State Implementation Plans; Coachella Valley and Western Mojave Desert,'' CARB, Release Date: September 22, 2014 (``2014 SIP Update''). We refer to these submittals collectively as the ``Coachella Valley Ozone Plan'' or ``Plan.'' The Coachella Valley is classified as Severe-15 with an attainment date no later than June 15, 2019. See 75 FR 24409 (May 5, 2010). The relevant CAA requirements appear at Title I, Part D of the CAA, under which states must implement the 1997 8-hour ozone (primary and secondary) standards.\2\ The EPA codified rules for the 1997 8-hour ozone standards at 40 CFR part 51, subpart X. See 69 FR 23951 (April 30, 2004); 70 FR 71612 (November 29, 2005). The EPA revoked the 1997 8- hour ozone NAAQS in 2015; \3\ notwithstanding this revocation, areas that were designated as nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS at the time the standards were revoked continue to be subject to certain SIP requirements that previously applied based on area classifications for the standards, under ``anti-backsliding'' regulations that the EPA promulgated to govern the transition from the 1-hour ozone standards to the 8-hour ozone standards. Id. at 12296; 40 CFR 51.1105 and 51.1100(o). Thus, in general, the Coachella Valley remains subject to the requirements of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS applicable to ``Severe'' nonattainment areas. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Title I, Part D of the CAA includes section 172, ``Nonattainment Plan Provisions in General,'' and subpart 2, ``Additional Provisions for Ozone Nonattainment Areas'' (sections 181-185). \3\ 80 FR 12264 (March 6, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the November 1, 2016 proposed rule, we proposed to approve the following elements of the Coachella Valley Ozone Plan under applicable statutory and regulatory requirements: The reasonably available control measures (RACM) demonstration; the rate of progress (ROP) and reasonable further progress (RFP) demonstrations; the attainment demonstration; and the demonstration that the SIP provides for transportation control strategies and measures sufficient to offset any growth in emissions from growth in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) or the number of vehicle trips, and to provide for RFP and attainment. More specifically, we determined that: No additional RACM, beyond the controls identified in the 2007 AQMP and 2007 State Strategy as revised by the 2009 State Strategy Status Report and 2011 State Strategy Progress Report, would advance attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone standards in the Coachella Valley to an attainment year of 2017. Therefore, the Coachella Valley Ozone Plan provides for the implementation of all RACM as required by CAA section 172(c)(1) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(17) (see 81 FR 75769-72 of the proposed rule). The ROP and RFP demonstrations in the 2014 SIP Update meet the requirements of CAA sections 172(c)(2) and 182(c)(2)(B) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(4) (see 81 FR 75774-76 of the proposed rule). The air quality modeling in the 2007 AQMP is adequate to support the attainment date of June 15, 2019 (attainment year 2018), and the 2007 AQMP's attainment demonstration meets the requirements of CAA section 182(c)(2)(A) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.100(o)(12) (see 81 FR 75772-73 of the proposed rule and the Technical Support Document (TSD) for the proposal \4\). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ This document is available online at www.regulations.gov in the docket EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0244, or from the EPA contact listed at the beginning of this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appendices D and E of the 2014 SIP Update demonstrate that the State has adopted sufficient transportation control strategies and measures to offset any growth in emissions from increasing VMT and vehicle trips in Coachella Valley, and complies with the VMT emissions offset requirement in CAA section 182(d)(1)(A) and 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(10) (see 81 FR 75777-79 of the proposed rule). We also proposed to approve updated motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for transportation conformity included in the 2014 SIP Update. See 81 FR 75776-77 of the proposed rule. Additionally, although emissions inventories are not a specific requirement under the anti- backsliding provisions, we found that the baseline and milestone year emissions inventories were adequate to support the other elements of the Coachella Valley Ozone Plan, including the RACM, RFP, ROP and attainment [[Page 26856]] demonstrations. See 81 FR 75768-69 of the proposed rule. We did not propose any action on the Coachella Valley Ozone Plan's contingency measures. The EPA's analysis and findings supporting our proposed actions are summarized in our proposal and are also discussed in the TSD for the proposal. In today's action, the EPA is finalizing all actions from the proposal, with the sole exception that we are not finalizing approval of the MVEBs in the 2014 SIP Update. As discussed further below, the MVEBs are not a continuing applicable requirement for the Coachella Valley under the EPA's anti-backsliding regulations, and our approval of the MVEBs is therefore not required under the CAA. II. Public Comments The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. We received no substantive adverse comments during this period. III. Final Action For the reasons discussed in our November 1, 2016 proposal and summarized above, the EPA is approving, under CAA section 110(k)(3), most elements of the Coachella Valley Ozone Plan as proposed. Specifically, the EPA is taking final action to approve the following the following elements as meeting the specified requirements for the revoked 1997 8-hour ozone standards: The RACM demonstration as meeting the requirements of CAA section 172(c)(1) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(17). the ROP and RFP demonstrations as meeting the requirements of CAA sections 172(c)(2) and 182(c)(2)(B) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(4). the attainment demonstration as meeting the requirements of CAA section 182(c)(2)(A) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(12). the demonstration that the SIP provides for transportation control strategies and measures sufficient to offset any growth in emissions from growth in VMT or the number of vehicle trips, and to provide for RFP and attainment, as meeting the requirements of CAA section 182(d)(1)(A) and 40 CFR 51.1105(a)(1) and 51.1100(o)(10). As noted in our proposal, we are not acting on the Plan's contingency measures. Contingency measures are a distinct provision of the CAA that we may act on separately from the attainment requirements. Upon further reflection, we are not finalizing our proposed approval of the MVEBs in the 2014 SIP Update. The CAA requires transportation conformity only in areas that are designated nonattainment or maintenance. Since the revocation of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, transportation conformity no longer applies to the Coachella Valley with respect to the revoked standards. 80 FR 12264, 12284 (March 6, 2015). Therefore, we have determined that it is not necessary to approve these budgets, given that they were developed for the now-revoked 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. However, consistent with the EPA's transportation conformity rule,\5\ the MVEBs from CARB's 2008 Ozone Early Progress Plan \6\ will remain in effect for the Coachella Valley until emission budgets are established and found adequate or are approved for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ 40 CFR part 93, subpart A. \6\ ``Early Progress Plans Demonstrating Progress Toward Attaining the 8-hour National Air Quality Standards for Ozone and Setting Transportation Conformity Budgets for Ventura County, Antelope Valley--Western Mojave Desert, Coachella Valley, Eastern Kern County, and Imperial County'' (revised), CARB (February 27, 2008). The EPA previously determined that the budgets in the Ozone Early Progress Plan are adequate for transportation conformity purposes. See 73 FR 25694 (May 7, 2008). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In this action, we are also amending 40 CFR 52.220 to clarify the scope of an earlier partial approval of the 2007 AQMP. In 2011, we approved portions of the 2007 AQMP as providing for attainment of the 1997 fine particulate matter NAAQS in the Los Angeles-South Coast area. 76 FR 69928 (November 9, 2011). However, the regulatory text that we adopted in that action did not specify that our approval extended only to those portions of the 2007 AQMP that CARB had submitted to us as SIP revisions,\7\ and only to those portions of the submitted material specified for approval in the preamble to that rulemaking. Today's action corrects the regulatory text to reflect that portions of the 2007 AQMP were excluded from the 2011 approval, including a portion applicable to the Coachella Valley that we are approving in today's action, and does not affect the substance of our prior final action, 76 FR 69928 (November 9, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See CARB Resolution 07-41 (September 27, 2007). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must [[Page 26857]] submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 11, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental regulations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: April 20, 2017. Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(398)(ii)(A)(1) and adding paragraphs (c)(398)(ii)(A)(4) and (c)(486) to read as read as follows: Sec. [thinsp]52.220 Identification of plan--in part. * * * * * (c) * * * (398) * * * (ii) * * * (A) * * * (1) Final South Coast 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (excluding those portions of Chapter 4 (``AQMP Control Strategy'') and Chapter 7 (``Implementation'') addressing District-recommended measures for adoption by CARB and references to those measures (pp. 4-43 through 4- 54 and the section titled ``Recommended Mobile Source and Clean Fuel Control Measures'' in table 7-3, pp. 7-8 and 7-9); those portions of Chapter 6 (``Clean Air Act Requirements'') and Chapter 7 (``Implementation'') addressing California Clean Air Act Requirements (pp. 6-13 through 6-22 and page 7-3); those portions of Chapter 4 (``AQMP Control Strategy'') addressing emission and risk reduction goals identified in the AQMP's proposed control measure MOB-03 (``Proposed Backstop Measures for Indirect Sources of Emissions from Ports and Port-Related Facilities'') (p. 4-24); the motor vehicle emissions budgets in Chapter 6 (``Clean Air Act Requirements'') (pp. 6- 24 through 6-26), and Chapter 8 (``Future Air Quality--Desert Nonattainment Areas'')), adopted on June 1, 2007. * * * * * (4) Final South Coast 2007 Air Quality Management Plan, Chapter 8 (``Future Air Quality--Desert Nonattainment Areas'') (excluding pp. 8- 14 to 8-17 (regarding transportation conformity budgets)), adopted on June 1, 2007.a * * * * * (486) The following plan was submitted on November 6, 2014, by the Governor's designee. (i) [Reserved] (ii) Additional materials. (A) California Air Resources Board. (1) California Air Resources Board, Staff Report, Proposed Updates to the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard, State Implementation Plans; Coachella Valley and Western Mojave Desert (excluding section III (pp. 8-12), Table A-2, Table B-2, Table C-2, the bottom row of Table E-1, Table E-3 and accompanying discussion of Western Mojave Desert ROG calculations on p. E-7, and Figure E-2 (regarding Western Mojave Desert); Table B-3 (regarding contingency measures); and Appendix D (regarding transportation conformity budgets)), adopted on October 24, 2014. [FR Doc. 2017-12019 Filed 6-9-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![26854 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
§ 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation, (d) * * *
and related services, special services, and
services performed by the Licensing
Division.
* * * * *
(5) Secure test examining fee (per staff member per hour) ............................................................................................................... 250
* * * * * Document Format (PDF). The Copyright (vi) Tests. In the case of tests, and
Office will review these materials to answer material for tests, published
PART 202—PREREGISTRATION AND determine if the work qualifies for the separately from other literary works, the
REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO secure test procedure. If the work deposit of one complete copy will
COPYRIGHT appears to be eligible, the Copyright suffice in lieu of two copies. In the case
Office will contact the applicant to of any secure test the applicant may
■ 3. The authority citation for part 202
schedule an appointment to examine an submit identifying material in lieu of
continues to read as follows:
unredacted copy of the test under secure one complete copy if the conditions set
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408(f), 702. conditions. forth in § 202.13(c) have been met.
■ 4. Add § 202.13 to read as follows: (4) On the appointed date, the * * * * *
applicant must bring the following
§ 202.13 Secure tests. Dated: May 19, 2017.
materials to the Copyright Office:
(a) General. This section prescribes (i) A copy of the completed Karyn Temple Claggett,
rules pertaining to the registration of application. Acting Register of Copyrights and Director
secure tests. (ii) The appropriate examination fee, of the U.S. Copyright Office.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this as required by § 201.3(d) of this chapter. Approved by:
section— (iii) A copy of the redacted version of Carla D. Hayden,
(1) A secure test is a nonmarketed test the secure test that was uploaded to the
administered under supervision at Librarian of Congress.
electronic registration system.
specified centers on scheduled dates, all (iv) A signed declaration confirming [FR Doc. 2017–12021 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
copies of which are accounted for and that the redacted copy specified in BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
either destroyed or returned to restricted paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of this section is
locked storage following each identical to the redacted copy that was
administration. uploaded to the electronic registration ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
(2) A test is nonmarketed if copies of system. AGENCY
the test are not sold, but instead are (v) An unredacted copy of the entire
distributed and used in such a manner secure test. 40 CFR Part 52
that the test sponsor or publisher retains (5) The Copyright Office will examine [EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0244; FRL–9962–54–
ownership and control of the copies. the copies specified in paragraphs Region 9]
(3) A test is administered under (c)(4)(iii) and (v) of this section in the
supervision if test proctors or the applicant’s presence. When the Approval and Promulgation of
equivalent supervise the administration examination is complete, the Office will Implementation Plans; State of
of the test. stamp the date of the appointment on California; Coachella Valley;
(4) A specified center is a place where the copies and will return them to the Attainment Plan for 1997 8-Hour Ozone
test takers are physically assembled at applicant. The Office will retain the Standards
the same time. signed declaration and the redacted
(c) Deposit requirements. Pursuant to copy that was uploaded to the electronic AGENCY: Environmental Protection
the authority granted by 17 U.S.C. registration system. Agency (EPA).
408(c)(1), the Register of Copyrights has ■ 5. Amend § 202.20 as follows: ACTION: Final rule.
determined that a secure test may be ■ a. Revise paragraph (b)(3).;
registered with identifying material, if SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
■ b. Remove paragraph (b)(4);
the following conditions are met: Agency (EPA) is approving state
■ c. Redesignate paragraphs (b)(5) and
(1) The applicant must complete and implementation plan (SIP) revisions
(6) as paragraphs (b)(4) and (5),
submit a standard application. The submitted by the State of California to
respectively;
application may be submitted by any of ■ d. Remove ‘‘, as amended by Pub. L.
provide for attainment of the 1997 8-
the parties listed in § 202.3(c)(1). 94–553’’ from newly redesignated hour ozone national ambient air quality
(2) The appropriate filing fee, as paragraph (b)(4) and add a period in its standards (NAAQS or ‘‘standards’’) in
required by § 201.3(c) of this chapter, place; and the Coachella Valley nonattainment
must be included with the application ■ e. Revise paragraph (c)(2)(vi).
area. The EPA finds the emissions
or charged to an active deposit account. The revisions read as follows: inventories to be acceptable and is
(3) The applicant must submit a approving the reasonably available
redacted copy of the entire secure test. § 202.20 Deposit of copies and control measures, transportation control
In addition, the applicant must phonorecords for copyright registration. strategies and measures, rate of progress
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
complete and submit the questionnaire * * * * * and reasonable further progress
that is posted on the Copyright Office’s (b) * * * demonstrations, attainment
Web site. The questionnaire and the (3) The term secure test has the demonstration, and vehicle miles
redacted copy must be contained in meaning set forth in § 202.13(b). traveled offset demonstration. We have
separate electronic files, and each file * * * * * determined that motor vehicle
must be uploaded to the electronic (c) * * * emissions budgets are not required for
registration system in Portable (2) * * * the 1997 8-hour ozone standards so we
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:07 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM 12JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_26965/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 26857
submit a rule report, which includes a (A) * * * FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
copy of the rule, to each House of the (1) Final South Coast 2007 Air Quality COMMISSION
Congress and to the Comptroller General Management Plan (excluding those
of the United States. The EPA will 47 CFR Part 96
portions of Chapter 4 (‘‘AQMP Control
submit a report containing this action Strategy’’) and Chapter 7 [GN Docket No. 12–354; FCC 16–55]
and other required information to the
(‘‘Implementation’’) addressing District-
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Amendment of the Commission’s
recommended measures for adoption by
Representatives, and the Comptroller Rules With Regard to Commercial
General of the United States prior to CARB and references to those measures
Operations in the 3550–3650 MHz Band
publication of the rule in the Federal (pp. 4–43 through 4–54 and the section
Register. A major rule cannot take effect titled ‘‘Recommended Mobile Source AGENCY: Federal Communications
until 60 days after it is published in the and Clean Fuel Control Measures’’ in Commission.
Federal Register. This action is not a table 7–3, pp. 7–8 and 7–9); those ACTION: Final rule; announcement of
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. portions of Chapter 6 (‘‘Clean Air Act effective date.
804(2). Requirements’’) and Chapter 7
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean (‘‘Implementation’’) addressing SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of California Clean Air Act Requirements Communications Commission
this action must be filed in the United (pp. 6–13 through 6–22 and page 7–3); (Commission) announces that the Office
States Court of Appeals for the those portions of Chapter 4 (‘‘AQMP of Management and Budget (OMB) has
appropriate circuit by August 11, 2017. approved, for a period of three years, the
Control Strategy’’) addressing emission
Filing a petition for reconsideration by information collection requirements
and risk reduction goals identified in
the Administrator of this final rule does associated with the Commission’s
the AQMP’s proposed control measure
not affect the finality of this action for Second Report and Order, GN Docket
MOB–03 (‘‘Proposed Backstop Measures No. 12–354, FCC 16–55. This document
the purposes of judicial review nor does for Indirect Sources of Emissions from
it extend the time within which a is consistent with the Second Report
Ports and Port-Related Facilities’’) (p. 4– and Order, which stated that the
petition for judicial review may be filed, 24); the motor vehicle emissions
and shall not postpone the effectiveness Commission would publish a document
budgets in Chapter 6 (‘‘Clean Air Act in the Federal Register announcing
of such rule or action. This action may Requirements’’) (pp. 6–24 through 6–
not be challenged later in proceedings to OMB approval and the effective date of
26), and Chapter 8 (‘‘Future Air the requirements.
enforce its requirements (see section Quality—Desert Nonattainment
307(b)(2)). DATES: The amendments to 47 CFR
Areas’’)), adopted on June 1, 2007. 96.25(c)(1)(i), published at 81 FR 49023,
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 * * * * * July 26, 2016, are effective on July 3,
Environmental protection, Air (4) Final South Coast 2007 Air Quality 2017.
pollution control, Incorporation by Management Plan, Chapter 8 (‘‘Future FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
reference, Intergovernmental Air Quality—Desert Nonattainment additional information, contact Cathy
regulations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Areas’’) (excluding pp. 8–14 to 8–17 Williams, Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov, (202)
Reporting and recordkeeping (regarding transportation conformity 418–2918.
requirements, Volatile organic budgets)), adopted on June 1, 2007.a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
compounds. document announces that, on May 11,
* * * * *
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 2017, OMB approved the revised
(486) The following plan was information collection requirements
Dated: April 20, 2017.
submitted on November 6, 2014, by the contained in the Commission’s Second
Alexis Strauss, Governor’s designee.
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Report and Order, FCC 16–55,
(i) [Reserved] published at 81 FR 49023, July 26, 2016.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code The OMB Control Number is 3060–
of Federal Regulations is amended as (ii) Additional materials. (A)
California Air Resources Board. 1211. The Commission publishes this
follows: document as an announcement of the
(1) California Air Resources Board, effective date of the requirements. If you
PART 52—APPROVAL AND Staff Report, Proposed Updates to the have any comments on the burden
PROMULGATION OF 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard, State estimates listed below, or how the
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Implementation Plans; Coachella Valley Commission can improve the
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 and Western Mojave Desert (excluding collections and reduce any burdens
continues to read as follows: section III (pp. 8–12), Table A–2, Table caused thereby, please contact Cathy
B–2, Table C–2, the bottom row of Table Williams, Federal Communications
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. E–1, Table E–3 and accompanying Commission, Room 1–C823, 445 12th
Subpart F—California discussion of Western Mojave Desert Street SW., Washington, DC 20554.
ROG calculations on p. E–7, and Figure Please include the OMB Control
■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by E–2 (regarding Western Mojave Desert); Number, 3060–1211 in your
revising paragraph (c)(398)(ii)(A)(1) and Table B–3 (regarding contingency correspondence. The Commission will
adding paragraphs (c)(398)(ii)(A)(4) and measures); and Appendix D (regarding also accept your comments via email at
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
(c)(486) to read as read as follows: transportation conformity budgets)), PRA@fcc.gov.
adopted on October 24, 2014. To request materials in accessible
§ 52.220 Identification of plan—in part. formats for people with disabilities
[FR Doc. 2017–12019 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
* * * * * (Braille, large print, electronic files,
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
(c) * * * audio format), send an email to fcc504@
(398) * * * fcc.gov or call the Consumer and
(ii) * * * Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:07 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JNR1.SGM 12JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_26965/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2017-06-10 01:40:46
Document Modified: 2017-06-10 01:40:46
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | Effective Date: This final rule is effective on July 12, 2017. | |
| Contact | Tom Kelly, Air Planning Office (AIR- 2), EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3856, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 26854 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Regulations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR