82 FR 26883 - Conditional Approval of Revision to the California State Implementation Plan; Imperial County Air Pollution Control District; Stationary Sources Permits
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 111 (June 12, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 111 (June 12, 2017)
| Page Range | 26883-26885 | |
| FR Document | 2017-12134 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 26883-26885] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-12134] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0621; FRL-9962-55-Region 9] Conditional Approval of Revision to the California State Implementation Plan; Imperial County Air Pollution Control District; Stationary Sources Permits AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing action on a revision to the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD or District) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We are proposing a conditional approval of one rule. This rule updates and revises the District's New Source Review (NSR) permitting program for new and modified sources of air pollution. We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action. DATES: Any comments must arrive by July 12, 2017. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09- OAR-2015-0621 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be removed or edited from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Khoi Nguyen, EPA Region IX, (415) 947- 4120, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents Definitions I. The State's Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of this rule? C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision? II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule? B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria? C. Public Comment and Final Action III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Definitions For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain words or initials as follows: (i) The word or initials CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise. (ii) The initials CARB mean or refer to the California Air Resources Board. (iii) The initials CFR mean or refer to Code of Federal Regulations. (iv) The initials or words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United States Environmental Protection Agency. (v) The word or initials ICAPCD or District mean or refer to the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, the agency with jurisdiction over stationary sources within Imperial County. (vi) The initials NSR mean or refer to New Source Review. (vii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation Plan. I. The State's Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this action with the date that it was adopted by ICAPCD and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), which is the governor's designee for California SIP submittals. Table 1--Submitted Rule ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted/revised Submitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ICAPCD........................ 207 New and Modified 10/22/13 1/21/14 Stationary Source Review. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On March 7, 2014, EPA determined that the submittal for ICAPCD Rule 207 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V. On December 19, 2016, the EPA proposed a limited approval and limited disapproval (LA/LD) of Rule 207 along with a full approval of two rules--Rule 204 (Applications) and Rule 206 (Processing of Applications). 81 FR 91895. In a separate rulemaking action, we are finalizing our approval of Rules 204 and 206. We are not finalizing our proposed LA/LD of Rule 207; instead, we are proceeding with this proposed action to conditionally approve Rule 207 into the SIP. B. Are there other versions of this rule? EPA approved a previous version of Rule 207 into the SIP on November 10, 1980 (45 FR 74480). In addition, SIP-approved Rule 209 (Implementation Plans) and submitted Rule 207, section D.1.a, contain substantially similar language. See 45 FR 74480 (November 10, 1980).\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Approval of submitted Rule 207 would supersede our prior actions for SIP-approved Rules 207 and 209. We intend to make conforming changes to the regulatory text codified in 40 CFR 52.220, 40 CFR 52.232 and 40 CFR 52.233. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 26884]] C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision? Section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to submit regulations that include a pre-construction permit program for certain new or modified stationary sources of pollutants, including a permit program as required by Part D of Title I of the CAA. The purpose of District Rule 207 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) is to implement a federal preconstruction permit program for new and modified minor sources of regulated NSR pollutants, and new and modified major sources of regulated NSR pollutants for which the area is designated nonattainment. Imperial County is currently designated as a Moderate nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).\2\ Portions of the county are designated as a Serious nonattainment area for the 1987 24- hour PM10 NAAQS, and as a Moderate nonattainment area for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 and 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. We present our evaluation under the CAA and EPA's regulations of the revised NSR rule submitted by CARB, as identified in Table 1, and provide our reasoning in general terms below and a more detailed analysis in our Technical Support Document (TSD), which is available in the docket for the proposed rulemaking. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ EPA initially classified Imperial County as Marginal for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, but reclassified the area to Moderate because it failed to attain the standard by the applicable Marginal attainment date of July 20, 2015. 81 FR 26697 (May 4, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule? The submitted rule must meet the CAA's general requirements for SIPs and SIP revisions in CAA sections 110(a)(2), 110(l), and 193, as well as the applicable requirements contained in part D of title I of the Act (sections 172 and 173) for a nonattainment NSR permit program. In addition, the submitted rule must contain the applicable regulatory provisions of 40 CFR 51.160-51.165 and 40 CFR 51.307. Among other things, section 110 of the Act requires that SIP rules be enforceable and provides that EPA may not approve a SIP revision if it would interfere with any applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or any other requirement of the CAA. In addition, section 110(a)(2) and section 110(l) of the Act require that each SIP or revision to a SIP submitted by a state must be adopted after reasonable notice and public hearing. Section 110(a)(2)(c) of the Act requires each SIP to include a permit program to regulate the modification and construction of any stationary source within the areas covered by the SIP as necessary to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. EPA's regulations at 40 CFR 51.160-51.164 provide general programmatic requirements to implement this statutory mandate commonly referred to as the ``minor NSR'' or ``general NSR'' permit program. These NSR program regulations impose requirements for SIP approval of state and local programs that are more general in nature as compared to the specific statutory and regulatory requirements for nonattainment NSR permitting programs under Part D of title I of the Act. Part D of title I of the Act contains the general requirements for areas designated nonattainment for a NAAQS (section 172), including preconstruction permit requirements for new major sources and major modifications proposing to construct in nonattainment areas (section 173). Additionally, 40 CFR 51.165 sets forth EPA's regulatory requirements for SIP-approval of a nonattainment NSR permit program. The protection of visibility requirements that apply to New Source Review programs are contained in 40 CFR 51.307. This provision requires that certain actions be taken in consultation with the local Federal Land Manager if a new major source or major modification may have an impact on visibility in any mandatory Class I Federal Area. Section 110(l) of the Act prohibits EPA from approving any SIP revisions that would interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (RFP) or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. Section 193 of the Act, which only applies in nonattainment areas, prohibits the modification of a SIP-approved control requirement in effect before November 15, 1990, in any manner unless the modification insures equivalent or greater emission reductions of such air pollutant. Our TSD, which can be found in the docket for this rule, contains a more detailed discussion of the approval criteria. B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria? Rule 207 satisfies the statutory and regulatory requirements for a general NSR permit program as set forth in CAA section 110(a)(2)(c) and 40 CFR 51.160-51.164, and the statutory and regulatory requirements for a nonattainment NSR permit program for moderate ozone and serious PM10 , nonattainment areas as set forth in the applicable provisions of part D of title I of the Act (sections 172 and 173), in 40 CFR 51.165 and 40 CFR 51.307. For a Moderate PM2.5 nonattainment area Rule 207 mostly satisfies these same requirements; however, we have determined that it does not satisfy the requirements of 40 CFR 51.165(a)(13), which requires ammonia to be regulated as a PM2.5 precursor. Our TSD contains a more detailed discussion of this issue.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See also, 81 FR 91895 (December 19, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Public Comment and Final Action. Section 110(k)(4) authorizes the EPA to conditionally approve a plan revision based on a commitment by the state to adopt specific enforceable measures by a date certain but not later than one year after the effective date of the plan approval. In this instance, the enforceable measure that the State must submit are revisions to regulate ammonia as a PM2.5 precursor. The District submitted a letter committing to submit a SIP revision that regulates ammonia as a PM2.5 precursor no later than one year from the effective of this final action. If the District fails to comply with this commitment, this conditional approval will convert to a disapproval and start an 18-month clock for sanctions under CAA section 179(a)(2) and a two-year clock for a federal implementation plan (FIP) under CAA section 110(c)(1). We will accept comments from the public on the proposed conditional approval of Rule 207 for the next 30 days. III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the ICAPCD rule listed in Table 1 of this notice. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders can be [[Page 26885]] found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders. A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review This action is not a significant regulatory action and was therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This action does not impose an information collection burden under the PRA because this action does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This action will not impose any requirements on small entities beyond those imposed by state law. D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, will result from this action. E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175, because the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction, and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action. G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Population The EPA lacks the discretionary authority to address environmental justice in this rulemaking. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, New Source Review, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: May 19, 2017. Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2017-12134 Filed 6-9-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules 26883
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Parts 405 and modified sources of air pollution. We Table of Contents
406 are taking comments on this proposal Definitions
Employers and labor relations and plan to follow with a final action. I. The State’s Submittal
consultants, Reporting and DATES: Any comments must arrive by A. What rule did the State submit?
recordkeeping requirements. July 12, 2017. B. Are there other versions of this rule?
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
Accordingly, for the reasons stated rule revision?
herein, the Secretary proposes to amend identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
parts 405 and 406 of title 29, chapter IV OAR–2015–0621 at http:// A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
of the Code of Federal Regulations to www.regulations.gov, or via email to B. Does the rule meet the evaluation
read as the text at 29 CFR parts 405 and R9AirPermits@epa.gov. For comments criteria?
406 (2015). submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the C. Public Comment and Final Action
online instructions for submitting III. Incorporation by Reference
Signed in Washington, DC, this 5th day of IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
June, 2017.
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be removed or edited from Definitions
Andrew Auerbach,
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
Deputy Director, Office of Labor-Management submission, the EPA may publish any For the purpose of this document, we
Standards. are giving meaning to certain words or
comment received to its public docket.
[FR Doc. 2017–11983 Filed 6–8–17; 4:15 pm]
Do not submit electronically any initials as follows:
BILLING CODE 4510–CP–P information you consider to be (i) The word or initials CAA mean or
Confidential Business Information (CBI) refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the
or other information whose disclosure is context indicates otherwise.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION restricted by statute. Multimedia (ii) The initials CARB mean or refer to
AGENCY submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be the California Air Resources Board.
accompanied by a written comment. (iii) The initials CFR mean or refer to
40 CFR Part 52 The written comment is considered the Code of Federal Regulations.
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0621; FRL–9962–55– official comment and should include (iv) The initials or words EPA, we, us
Region 9] discussion of all points you wish to or our mean or refer to the United States
make. The EPA will generally not Environmental Protection Agency.
Conditional Approval of Revision to consider comments or comment (v) The word or initials ICAPCD or
the California State Implementation contents located outside of the primary District mean or refer to the Imperial
Plan; Imperial County Air Pollution submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or County Air Pollution Control District,
Control District; Stationary Sources other file sharing system). For the agency with jurisdiction over
Permits additional submission methods, please stationary sources within Imperial
contact the person identified in the FOR County.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. (vi) The initials NSR mean or refer to
Agency (EPA).
For the full EPA public comment policy, New Source Review.
ACTION: Proposed rule. information about CBI or multimedia (vii) The initials SIP mean or refer to
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection submissions, and general guidance on State Implementation Plan.
Agency (EPA) is proposing action on a making effective comments, please visit
I. The State’s Submittal
revision to the Imperial County Air http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
Pollution Control District (ICAPCD or commenting-epa-dockets. A. What rule did the State submit?
District) portion of the California State FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this
Implementation Plan (SIP). We are Khoi Nguyen, EPA Region IX, (415) action with the date that it was adopted
proposing a conditional approval of one 947–4120, nguyen.thien@epa.gov. by ICAPCD and submitted by the
rule. This rule updates and revises the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: California Air Resources Board (CARB),
District’s New Source Review (NSR) Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ which is the governor’s designee for
permitting program for new and and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. California SIP submittals.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted/revised Submitted
ICAPCD ............................... 207 New and Modified Stationary Source Review ................ 10/22/13 1/21/14
On March 7, 2014, EPA determined we are finalizing our approval of Rules D.1.a, contain substantially similar
that the submittal for ICAPCD Rule 207 204 and 206. We are not finalizing our language. See 45 FR 74480 (November
(New and Modified Stationary Source proposed LA/LD of Rule 207; instead, 10, 1980).1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Review) met the completeness criteria we are proceeding with this proposed
in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V. On action to conditionally approve Rule
December 19, 2016, the EPA proposed a 207 into the SIP.
limited approval and limited B. Are there other versions of this rule?
disapproval (LA/LD) of Rule 207 along
EPA approved a previous version of
with a full approval of two rules—Rule Rule 207 into the SIP on November 10,
1 Approval of submitted Rule 207 would
204 (Applications) and Rule 206 supersede our prior actions for SIP-approved Rules
1980 (45 FR 74480). In addition, SIP- 207 and 209. We intend to make conforming
(Processing of Applications). 81 FR approved Rule 209 (Implementation changes to the regulatory text codified in 40 CFR
91895. In a separate rulemaking action, Plans) and submitted Rule 207, section 52.220, 40 CFR 52.232 and 40 CFR 52.233.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:49 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM 12JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_26994/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules 26885
found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws- G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
regulations/laws-and-executive-orders. Children From Environmental Health HUMAN SERVICES
Risks and Safety Risks
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Planning and Review and Executive The EPA interprets Executive Order Services
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 13045 as applying only to those
Regulatory Review regulatory actions that concern 42 CFR Chapter IV
This action is not a significant environmental health or safety risks that
regulatory action and was therefore not the EPA has reason to believe may Office of the Secretary
submitted to the Office of Management disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory 45 CFR Subtitle A
and Budget (OMB) for review.
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) [CMS–9928–NC]
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 RIN 0938–ZB39
This action does not impose an
because it does not impose additional
information collection burden under the Reducing Regulatory Burdens
requirements beyond those imposed by
PRA because this action does not Imposed by the Patient Protection and
impose additional requirements beyond state law.
Affordable Care Act & Improving
those imposed by state law. H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Healthcare Choices To Empower
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Patients
Distribution, or Use
I certify that this action will not have AGENCY: Centers for Medicare &
a significant economic impact on a This action is not subject to Executive Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
substantial number of small entities Order 13211, because it is not a ACTION: Request for information.
under the RFA. This action will not significant regulatory action under
impose any requirements on small Executive Order 12866. SUMMARY: The Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) is actively
entities beyond those imposed by state I. National Technology Transfer and working to reduce regulatory burdens
law. Advancement Act (NTTAA) and improve health insurance options
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act under Title I of the Patient Protection
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs
(UMRA) and Affordable Care Act. Executive
the EPA to use voluntary consensus Order 13765, ‘‘Minimizing the
This action does not contain any standards in its regulatory activities Economic Burden of the Patient
unfunded mandate as described in unless to do so would be inconsistent Protection and Affordable Care Act
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does with applicable law or otherwise Pending Repeal,’’ directs the Secretary
not significantly or uniquely affect small impractical. The EPA believes that this of Health and Human Services to
governments. This action does not action is not subject to the requirements achieve these aims. HHS seeks comment
impose additional requirements beyond of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because from interested parties to inform its
those imposed by state law. application of those requirements would ongoing efforts to create a more patient-
Accordingly, no additional costs to be inconsistent with the CAA. centered health care system that adheres
State, local, or tribal governments, or to to the key principles of affordability,
the private sector, will result from this J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
accessibility, quality, innovation, and
action. Actions To Address Environmental
empowerment.
Justice in Minority Populations and
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism Low-Income Population DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before July 12, 2017.
This action does not have federalism The EPA lacks the discretionary ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
implications. It will not have substantial authority to address environmental in one of three ways (please choose only
direct effects on the states, on the justice in this rulemaking. one of the ways listed):
relationship between the national 1. Electronically. You may submit
government and the states, or on the List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
electronic comments to http://
distribution of power and www.regulations.gov. Follow the
Environmental protection, Air
responsibilities among the various ‘‘Submit a comment’’ instructions.
pollution control, Incorporation by
levels of government. 2. By regular mail. You may mail
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination New Source Review, Ozone, Particulate written comments to the following
With Indian Tribal Governments matter, Reporting and recordkeeping address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
requirements, Volatile organic Medicaid Services, Department of
This action does not have tribal compounds. Health and Human Services, Attention:
implications, as specified in Executive CMS–9928–NC, P.O. Box 8016,
Order 13175, because the SIP is not Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Baltimore, MD 21244–8016.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
approved to apply on any Indian Dated: May 19, 2017. Please allow sufficient time for mailed
reservation land or in any other area Alexis Strauss, comments to be received before the
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
close of the comment period.
demonstrated that a tribe has 3. By express or overnight mail. You
[FR Doc. 2017–12134 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
jurisdiction, and will not impose may send written comments to the
substantial direct costs on tribal BILLING CODE 6560–50–P following address ONLY: Centers for
governments or preempt tribal law. Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not Department of Health and Human
apply to this action. Services, Attention: CMS–9928–NC,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM 12JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_26994/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-06-10 01:40:42
Document Modified: 2017-06-10 01:40:42
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Any comments must arrive by July 12, 2017. | |
| Contact | Khoi Nguyen, EPA Region IX, (415) 947- 4120, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 26883 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; New Source Review; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR