82 FR 26907 - Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 111 (June 12, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 111 (June 12, 2017)
| Page Range | 26907-26909 | |
| FR Document | 2017-12108 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 26907-26909] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-12108] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-489-819] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) has completed its administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey). The period of review (POR) is September 15, 2014, [[Page 26908]] through December 31, 2014. This review covers 12 producers/exporters of subject merchandise, two of which the Department selected for individual examination: Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi A.S. (Icdas) and Kaptan Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.S. and Kaptan Metal Dis Ticaret ve Nakliyat A.S. (Kaptan Demir Companies) (collectively, the mandatory respondents). The ten firms that were not individually examined are included in the chart under the Final Results of Review section, below. We find that the mandatory respondents each received a de minimis net subsidy rate during the POR. See ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice below for the rates calculated for the companies covered in this review. DATES: Effective June 12, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Johnson (Icdas) and Samuel Brummitt (Kaptan Demir Companies), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4793, and (202) 482-7851, respectively. Scope of the Order The scope of the order consists of steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form (rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade. The subject merchandise is classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) primarily under item numbers 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010. The subject merchandise may also enter under other HTSUS numbers including 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.5000, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057, 7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6085, 7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this Order is dispositive.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Countervailing Duty Order, 79 FR 65926 (November 6, 2014) (the Order). For a full description of the scope of this order see Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Final Results of Countervailing Duty 2014 Administrative Review: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in interested parties' briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised by interested parties and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is provided in the Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Methodology The Department conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\2\ For a full description of the methodology underlying all of the Department's conclusions, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partial Rescission of Review Entries of merchandise produced and exported by Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S. (Habas) are not subject to countervailing duties because the Department's final determination with respect to this producer/exporter combination was negative.\3\ However, as stated in the Initiation Notice, any entries of merchandise produced by any other entity and exported by Habas, or produced by Habas and exported by another entity, are subject to the Order.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, 79 FR 54963, 54964 (September 15, 2014). \4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 736, 740 (at footnote 4) (January 7, 2016) (Initiation Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Because there is no evidence on the record of entries of merchandise produced by another entity and exported by Habas, or entries of merchandise produced by Habas and exported by another entity, we determine that Habas is not subject to this administrative review. Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), we are rescinding the review with respect to Habas. Final Results of Review In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we determine the following net countervailable subsidy rates for the period September 15, 2014, through December 31, 2014: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The name of Tata Steel UK was incorrectly spelled in the Initiation Notice. The company's name was inadvertently listed as ``Tata Steel U.'' See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 740. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subsidy rate Company ad valorem (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi A.S......... * 0.01 Kaptan Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.S. and Kaptan * 0.02 Metal D[inodot][scedil] Ticaret ve Nakliyat A.S........ 3212041 Canada Inc...................................... 0.00 Acemar International Limited............................ 0.00 As Gaz Sinai ve Tibbi Azlar A.S......................... 0.00 Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S. (also known as Colakoglu 0.00 Disticaret AS)......................................... Colakoglu Metalurji A.S................................. 0.00 Del Industrial Metals................................... 0.00 Izmir Demir Celik Sanayi A.S............................ 0.00 Ozkan Demir Celik Sanayi A.S............................ 0.00 Tata Steel International (Hong Kong) Limited (also known 0.00 as Tata Steel International (Hong Kong))............... [[Page 26909]] Tata Steel UK \5\....................................... 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * de minimis. In accordance with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Albemarle Corp. v. United States,\6\ we are applying to the non-selected companies the rates calculated for the mandatory respondents, which are de minimis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. May 2, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure We will disclose to the parties in this proceeding the calculations performed for these final results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment and Cash Deposit Requirements In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), the Department intends to issue assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review to liquidate shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after September 15, 2014, through December 31, 2014, without regard to countervailing duties because a de minimis subsidy rate was determined for each of the above listed companies. The Department also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of zero percent for each company listed on shipments of the subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or all others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these final results of review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: June 6, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. APPENDIX List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. List of Comments IV. Scope of the Order V. Subsidies Valuation Information VI. Analysis of Programs A. Programs Determined To Be Countervailable 1. Rediscount Program 2. Assistance To Offset Costs Related To AD/CVD Investigations B. Programs Determined To Not Be Countervailable 1. Purchase of Electricity for More Than Adequate Remuneration (MTAR)--Sales on the Grid 2. Purchase of Electricity for MTAR--Sales to Public Buyers C. Program Determined To Not Be Countervailable For a Respondent 1. Provision of Natural Gas for Less Than Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) D. Programs Determined To Not Confer Countervailable Benefits 1. Reduction and Exemption of Licensing Fees for Renewable Resource Power Plants 2. Investment Incentive Certificates E. Programs Determined To Not Be Used 1. Purchase of Electricity for MTAR--Sales via Build-Operate- Own, Build-Operate-Transfer, and Transfer of Operating Rights Contracts 2. Provision of Lignite for LTAR 3. Purchase of Electricity Generated From Renewable Resources for MTAR 4. Deductions From Taxable Income for Export Revenue 5. Research and Development Grant Program 6. Export Credits, Loans, and Insurance From Turk Eximbank a. Pre-Shipment Export Credits b. Foreign Trade Company Export Loans c. Pre-Export Credits d. Short-Term Export Credit Discount Program e. Export Insurance 7. Regional Investment Incentives a. Value Added Tax (VAT) and Customs Duty Exemptions b. Income Tax Reductions c. Social Security Support d. Land Allocation 8. Large-Scale Investment Incentives a. VAT and Customs Duty Exemptions b. Tax Reduction c. Income Tax Withholding Allowance d. Social Security and Interest Support e. Land Allocation 9. Strategic Investment Incentives a. VAT and Customs Duty Exemptions b. Tax Reduction c. Income Tax Withholding Allowance d. Social Security and Interest Support e. Land Allocation f. VAT Refunds 10. Incentives for Research & Development (R&D) Activities a. Tax Breaks and Other Assistance b. Product Development R&D Support--UFT 11. Regional Development Subsidies a. Provision of Land for LTAR b. Provision of Electricity for LTAR c. Withholding of Income Tax on Wages and Salaries d. Exemption From Property Tax e. Employers' Share in Insurance Premiums f. Preferential Tax Benefits for Turkish Rebar Producers Located in Free Zones g. Preferential Lending to Turkish Rebar Producers Located in Free Zones h. Exemptions From Foreign Exchange Restrictions to Turkish Rebar Producers Located in Free Zones i. Preferential Rates for Land Rent and Purchase to Turkish Rebar Producers Located in Free Zones VII. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether the Purchase of Electricity for MTAR Is Countervailable Comment 2: Whether the Department Should Countervail the Provision of Lignite for LTAR Comment 3: Whether the Department Should Countervail the Provision of Natural Gas for LTAR Comment 4: Whether the Assistance to Offset Costs Related to AD/ CVD Investigation Is Countervailable Comment 5: Whether the Department Should Have Required a Response From Kaptan Demir's Cross-Owned Power Producer VIII. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2017-12108 Filed 6-9-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Notices 26907
not be in compliance with the terms of reached.16 Accordingly, the questions of sucrose is 5988; and the Chemical Abstracts
the CVD Agreement, and further, that the status of, and compliance, with the Service (CAS) Number of sucrose is 57–50–
the CVD Agreement may no longer be CVD Agreement, whether suspension of 1.
Sugar described in the previous paragraph
meeting all of the statutory the CVD Agreement is in the ‘‘public
includes products of all polarimeter readings
requirements, as set forth in sections interest,’’ including the availability of described in various forms, such as raw
704(c) and (d) of the Act. supplies of sugar in the U.S. market, and sugar, estandar or standard sugar, high
On February 13, 2017, at the request whether ‘‘effective monitoring’’ is polarity or semi-refined sugar, special white
of interested parties ASC, Imperial, and practicable have been rendered moot sugar, refined sugar, brown sugar, edible
Zucarmex S.A. de C.V. (Zucarmex), the because either the CVD Agreement will molasses, desugaring molasses, organic raw
Department initiated an administrative be amended and suspension of the sugar, and organic refined sugar. Other sugar
review of the CVD Agreement for the investigation will be continued with the products, such as powdered sugar, colored
sugar, flavored sugar, and liquids and syrups
period January 1, 2016 through Department’s issuance of a final
that contain 95 percent or more sugar by dry
December 31, 2016.13 amendment to the CVD Agreement, or weight are also within the scope of the order.
On May 1, 2017, the Department the CVD Agreement will be terminated, The scope of the order does not include (1)
notified the GOM of its intent to per the May 1, 2017 notice of intent to sugar imported under the Refined Sugar Re-
terminate the CVD Agreement pursuant terminate, as modified by its June 5, Export Programs of the U.S. Department of
to Section XI.B of the CVD Agreement, 2017 letter.17 Therefore, the Department Agriculture; 18 (2) sugar products produced
unless the parties reached agreement is rescinding the 2014–2015 and 2015– in Mexico that contain 95 percent or more
2016 administrative reviews of the CVD sugar by dry weight that originated outside
upon resolution of the outstanding of Mexico; (3) inedible molasses (other than
issues with the current agreement on or Agreement.
inedible desugaring molasses noted above);
before June 5, 2016.14 On June 5, 2017, Notification to Interested Parties (4) beverages; (5) candy; (6) certain specialty
the Department notified the GOM that it sugars; and (7) processed food products that
was extending the period within which This notice serves as the only contain sugar (e.g., cereals). Specialty sugars
to reach an agreement until June 6, reminder to parties subject to excluded from the scope of the order are
2017.15 administrative protective order (APO) of limited to the following: caramelized slab
their responsibility concerning the sugar candy, pearl sugar, rock candy, dragees
Scope of CVD Agreement disposition of proprietary information for cooking and baking, fondant, golden
disclosed under APO in accordance syrup, and sugar decorations.
The product subject to the CVD Merchandise covered by the CVD
Agreement is raw and refined sugar of with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
Agreement is typically imported under the
all polarimeter readings derived from written notification of return/
following headings of the HTSUS:
sugar cane or sugar beets. The covered destruction of APO materials or 1701.12.1000, 1701.12.5000, 1701.13.1000,
merchandise is classified in the conversion to judicial protective order is 1701.13.5000, 1701.14.1000, 1701.14.5000,
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the hereby requested. Failure to comply 1701.91.1000, 1701.91.3000, 1701.99.1010,
United States (HTSUS) at subheadings: with the regulations and the terms of an 1701.99.1025, 1701.99.1050, 1701.99.5010,
1701.12.1000, 1701.12.5000, APO is a sanctionable violation. 1701.99.5025, 1701.99.5050, and
We are issuing and publishing this 1702.90.4000. The tariff classification is
1701.13.1000, 1701.13.5000, provided for convenience and customs
1701.14.1000, 1701.14.5000, notice in accordance with sections
704(f), 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. purposes; however, the written description of
1701.91.1000, 1701.91.3000, the scope of the order is dispositive.
1701.99.1010, 1701.99.1025, Dated: June 6, 2017.
[FR Doc. 2017–12116 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
1701.99.1050, 1701.99.5010, Ronald K. Lorentzen,
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
1701.99.5025, 1701.99.5050, and Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
1702.90.4000. and Compliance.
See Appendix I for the full Appendix I: Scope of the CVD DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
description of merchandise covered by Agreement
the CVD Agreement. International Trade Administration
The product covered by the CVD
Period of Administrative Reviews Agreement is raw and refined sugar of all [C–489–819]
The POR of the first administrative polarimeter readings derived from sugar cane
or sugar beets. The chemical sucrose gives Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From
review is December 19, 2014 through sugar its essential character. Sucrose is a the Republic of Turkey: Final Results
December 31, 2015 and the POR of the nonreducing disaccharide compo15)10sed of and Partial Rescission of
second administrative review is January glucose and fructose linked by a glycosidic Countervailing Duty Administrative
1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. bond via their anomeric carbons. The Review; 2014
molecular formula for sucrose is C12H22O11;
Rescission of Administrative Reviews the International Union of Pure and Applied AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
The Department has indicated its Chemistry (IUPAC) International Chemical International Trade Administration,
intent to terminate the CVD Agreement, Identifier (InChl) for sucrose is 1S/ Department of Commerce.
unless an amended agreement can be C12H22O11/c13-l-4-6(16)8(18)9(19)11(21- SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
4)23-12(3-15)10(20)7(17)5(2-14)22-12/h4- (the Department) has completed its
11,13-20H,1-H2/t4-,5-,6-,7-,8+,9-,10+,11-
13 See Initiation of Antidumping and
,12+/m1/s1; the InChl Key for sucrose is
administrative review of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR countervailing duty (CVD) order on steel
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N;
10457 (February 13, 2017) (2015–2016 concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the
Administrative Review). the U.S. National Institutes of Health
14 See Letter from Ronald Lorentzen to Aristeo PubChem Compound Identifier (CID) for Republic of Turkey (Turkey). The period
Lopez, ‘‘Agreement Suspending the Countervailing of review (POR) is September 15, 2014,
Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico’’ (May 1, 16 See May 1, 2017 letter, as modified by the June
2017) (May 1, 2017 letter). 5, 2017 letter. 18 This exclusion applies to sugar imported under
15 See Letter from Ronald Lorentzen to Aristeo 17 See May 1, 2017 Letter. Thus, if no amendment the Refined Sugar Re-Export Program, the Sugar-
Lopez, ‘‘Agreement Suspending the Countervailing is finalized, the administrative reviews will be moot Containing Products Re-Export Program, and the
Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico’’ (June 5, for the alternative reason that the CVD Agreement Polyhydric Alcohol Program administered by the
2017) (June 5, 2017 letter). has been terminated. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_27018/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Notices 26909
Subsidy rate
Company ad valorem
(percent)
Tata Steel UK 5 .................................................................................................................................................................................... 0.00
* de minimis.
In accordance with the U.S. Court of destruction of APO materials or e. Export Insurance
Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s conversion to judicial protective order is 7. Regional Investment Incentives
decision in Albemarle Corp. v. United hereby requested. Failure to comply a. Value Added Tax (VAT) and Customs
States,6 we are applying to the non- with the regulations and the terms of an Duty Exemptions
selected companies the rates calculated APO is a sanctionable violation. b. Income Tax Reductions
for the mandatory respondents, which We are issuing and publishing these c. Social Security Support
are de minimis. final results of review in accordance d. Land Allocation
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 8. Large-Scale Investment Incentives
Disclosure a. VAT and Customs Duty Exemptions
the Act, 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 19
We will disclose to the parties in this CFR 351.221(b)(5). b. Tax Reduction
proceeding the calculations performed c. Income Tax Withholding Allowance
Dated: June 6, 2017. d. Social Security and Interest Support
for these final results within five days
Ronald K. Lorentzen, e. Land Allocation
of the date of publication of this notice
in the Federal Register.7 Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 9. Strategic Investment Incentives
and Compliance. a. VAT and Customs Duty Exemptions
Assessment and Cash Deposit b. Tax Reduction
Requirements APPENDIX
c. Income Tax Withholding Allowance
In accordance with 19 CFR List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and d. Social Security and Interest Support
Decision Memorandum e. Land Allocation
351.212(b)(2), the Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to U.S. I. Summary f. VAT Refunds
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 II. Background 10. Incentives for Research & Development
III. List of Comments (R&D) Activities
days after the date of publication of
IV. Scope of the Order a. Tax Breaks and Other Assistance
these final results of review to liquidate V. Subsidies Valuation Information
shipments of subject merchandise b. Product Development R&D Support—
VI. Analysis of Programs
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, UFT
A. Programs Determined To Be
for consumption on or after September Countervailable 11. Regional Development Subsidies
15, 2014, through December 31, 2014, 1. Rediscount Program a. Provision of Land for LTAR
without regard to countervailing duties 2. Assistance To Offset Costs Related To b. Provision of Electricity for LTAR
because a de minimis subsidy rate was AD/CVD Investigations c. Withholding of Income Tax on Wages
determined for each of the above listed B. Programs Determined To Not Be and Salaries
Countervailable d. Exemption From Property Tax
companies.
1. Purchase of Electricity for More Than e. Employers’ Share in Insurance
The Department also intends to Adequate Remuneration (MTAR)—Sales
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of Premiums
on the Grid f. Preferential Tax Benefits for Turkish
zero percent for each company listed on 2. Purchase of Electricity for MTAR—Sales
shipments of the subject merchandise Rebar Producers Located in Free Zones
to Public Buyers
g. Preferential Lending to Turkish Rebar
entered or withdrawn from warehouse, C. Program Determined To Not Be
Producers Located in Free Zones
for consumption on or after the date of Countervailable For a Respondent
1. Provision of Natural Gas for Less Than h. Exemptions From Foreign Exchange
publication of the final results of this
Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) Restrictions to Turkish Rebar Producers
review. For all non-reviewed firms, we
D. Programs Determined To Not Confer Located in Free Zones
will instruct CBP to collect cash
Countervailable Benefits i. Preferential Rates for Land Rent and
deposits of estimated countervailing
1. Reduction and Exemption of Licensing Purchase to Turkish Rebar Producers
duties at the most recent company- Fees for Renewable Resource Power Located in Free Zones
specific or all others rate applicable to Plants VII. Analysis of Comments
the company, as appropriate. These cash 2. Investment Incentive Certificates Comment 1: Whether the Purchase of
deposit requirements, when imposed, E. Programs Determined To Not Be Used Electricity for MTAR Is Countervailable
shall remain in effect until further 1. Purchase of Electricity for MTAR—Sales Comment 2: Whether the Department
notice. via Build-Operate-Own, Build-Operate-
Should Countervail the Provision of
Transfer, and Transfer of Operating
Return or Destruction of Proprietary Lignite for LTAR
Rights Contracts
Information 2. Provision of Lignite for LTAR Comment 3: Whether the Department
3. Purchase of Electricity Generated From Should Countervail the Provision of
This notice also serves as a reminder Natural Gas for LTAR
to parties subject to administrative Renewable Resources for MTAR
4. Deductions From Taxable Income for Comment 4: Whether the Assistance to
protective order (APO) of their Offset Costs Related to AD/CVD
Export Revenue
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
responsibility concerning the 5. Research and Development Grant Investigation Is Countervailable
disposition of proprietary information Program Comment 5: Whether the Department
disclosed under APO in accordance 6. Export Credits, Loans, and Insurance Should Have Required a Response From
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely From Turk Eximbank Kaptan Demir’s Cross-Owned Power
written notification of the return or a. Pre-Shipment Export Credits Producer
b. Foreign Trade Company Export Loans VIII. Conclusion
6 See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d c. Pre-Export Credits
1345 (Fed. Cir. May 2, 2016). d. Short-Term Export Credit Discount [FR Doc. 2017–12108 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
7 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). Program BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_27018/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-06-10 01:40:40
Document Modified: 2017-06-10 01:40:40
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective June 12, 2017. | |
| Contact | Kristen Johnson (Icdas) and Samuel Brummitt (Kaptan Demir Companies), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4793, and (202) 482-7851, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 26907 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR