82 FR 26912 - Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 111 (June 12, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 111 (June 12, 2017)
| Page Range | 26912-26914 | |
| FR Document | 2017-12106 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 26912-26914] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-12106] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-900] Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014- 2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 9, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof (diamond sawblades) from the People's Republic of China (the PRC). The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015. For the final results, we continue to find that certain companies covered by this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. DATES: Effective June 12, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5760 and (202) 482-3683, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 9, 2016, the Department published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades from the PRC.\1\ We received case and rebuttal briefs with respect to the Preliminary Results. The deadline for the final results of this review is June 7, 2017. We conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 89045 (December 9, 2016) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is diamond sawblades. The diamond sawblades subject to the order are currently classifiable under subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and may also enter under subheading 6804.21.00. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ The written description is dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See the Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China,'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum) dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice, at 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as an appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. Final Determination of No Shipments We preliminarily found that Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd., Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Starcraft Tools Co., Ltd., which have been eligible for separate rates in previous segments of the proceeding and are subject to this review, did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR.\3\ After the Preliminary Results, we received no comments or additional information with respect to these five companies. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that these five companies did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Consistent with our practice, we will issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on our final results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 89045, n.2, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separate Rates The Department preliminarily determined that 24 respondents are eligible to receive separate rates in this review.\4\ We made no changes to these determinations for the final results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 89045, n.6, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4-8. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes Since the Preliminary Results We made revisions to the Preliminary Results following our findings in the verification of Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.'s U.S. sales. Final Results of the Review As a result of this administrative review, we determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Margin Company (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.................................... 6.19 Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.................. 6.19 Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd.............. 6.19 Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd... 6.19 Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd............... 6.19 Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd............... 6.19 Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd............ 6.19 [[Page 26913]] Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd................ 6.19 Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd...... 6.19 Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd.............. 6.19 Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd.................... 6.19 Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity \5\....................... 82.05 Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation................... 6.19 Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd................ 6.19 Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd................ 6.19 Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd................. 6.19 Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd................................ 6.19 Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.............. 6.19 Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd............. 6.19 Sino Tools Co., Ltd..................................... 6.19 Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd........ 6.19 Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd \6\.......... 6.19 Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd................... 6.19 Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd..................... 6.19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\7\ For a customer or importer of Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., we have calculated a customer/importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rate in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ We continue to treat Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Fengtai Sawing Industry Co., Ltd., as a single entity. See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 89046, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 2, n.4 for details. \6\ Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., is the successor-in-interest to Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 81 FR 20618 (April 8, 2016). \7\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an antidumping duty assessment rate of 82.05 percent to all entries of subject merchandise that entered the United States during the POR. For all non-selected respondents that received a separate rate, we will instruct CBP to apply an antidumping duty assessment rate of 6.19 percent \8\ to all entries of subject merchandise that entered the United States during the POR. For all other companies, we will instruct CBP to apply the antidumping duty assessment rate of the PRC- wide entity, 82.05 percent, to all entries of subject merchandise exported by these companies.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 5-6. \9\ See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 737 (``All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as described below.''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In addition, for the five companies that we determined had no reviewable entries of the subject merchandise in this review period, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these final results of review for each exporter as listed above; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter- specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. These final results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: June 6, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Surrogate Country V. Separate Rates VI. Discussion of the Issues a. Adverse Facts Available [[Page 26914]] b. Differential Pricing c. Value-Added Tax d. Surrogate Values VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-12106 Filed 6-9-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![26912 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Notices
during the meeting, comments must be Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue building. In addition, a complete
received no later than 5 p.m. EDT on NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: version of the Issues and Decision
Wednesday, June 21, 2017, to ensure (202) 482–5760 and (202) 482–3683, Memorandum can be accessed directly
transmission to the Board prior to the respectively. on the Enforcement and Compliance
meeting. Comments received after that SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Web site at http://
date and time will be distributed to the enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
members but may not be considered Background
Final Determination of No Shipments
during the meeting. Copies of Board On December 9, 2016, the Department
meeting minutes will be available published the preliminary results of the We preliminarily found that Danyang
within 90 days of the meeting. administrative review of the City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd., Danyang
Dated: June 6, 2017. antidumping duty order on diamond Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.,
Brian Beall, sawblades from the PRC.1 We received Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co.,
case and rebuttal briefs with respect to Ltd., Qingdao Shinhan Diamond
Executive Secretary, United States Travel and
Tourism Advisory Board. the Preliminary Results. The deadline Industrial Co., Ltd., and Shanghai
for the final results of this review is June Starcraft Tools Co., Ltd., which have
[FR Doc. 2017–12047 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
7, 2017. We conducted this been eligible for separate rates in
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
administrative review in accordance previous segments of the proceeding
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of and are subject to this review, did not
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1930, as amended (the Act). have any reviewable entries of subject
Scope of the Order merchandise during the POR.3 After the
International Trade Administration Preliminary Results, we received no
The merchandise subject to the order comments or additional information
[A–570–900] is diamond sawblades. The diamond with respect to these five companies.
sawblades subject to the order are Therefore, for the final results, we
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof currently classifiable under subheadings
From the People’s Republic of China: continue to find that these five
8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff companies did not have any reviewable
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
Administrative Review; 2014–2015 entries of subject merchandise during
and may also enter under subheading the POR. Consistent with our practice,
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 6804.21.00. The HTSUS subheadings we will issue appropriate instructions to
International Trade Administration, are provided for convenience and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Department of Commerce. customs purposes. A full description of (CBP) based on our final results.
SUMMARY: On December 9, 2016, the the scope of the order is contained in
Department of Commerce (the the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 Separate Rates
Department) published the preliminary The written description is dispositive.
The Department preliminarily
results of the administrative review of Analysis of Comments Received determined that 24 respondents are
the antidumping duty order on diamond All issues raised in the case and eligible to receive separate rates in this
sawblades and parts thereof (diamond rebuttal briefs by parties to this review.4 We made no changes to these
sawblades) from the People’s Republic administrative review are addressed in determinations for the final results.
of China (the PRC). The period of review the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
(POR) is November 1, 2014, through Changes Since the Preliminary Results
A list of the issues raised is attached to
October 31, 2015. For the final results, this notice as an appendix. The Issues We made revisions to the Preliminary
we continue to find that certain and Decision Memorandum is a public Results following our findings in the
companies covered by this review made document and is on file electronically verification of Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.’s
sales of subject merchandise at less than via Enforcement and Compliance’s U.S. sales.
normal value. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
DATES: Effective June 12, 2017.
Final Results of the Review
Centralized Electronic Service System
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to As a result of this administrative
Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/ registered users at http:// review, we determine that the following
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement access.trade.gov and to all parties in the weighted-average dumping margins
and Compliance, International Trade Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of exist for the period November 1, 2014,
Administration, U.S. Department of the main Department of Commerce through October 31, 2015:
Margin
Company (percent)
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6.19
Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................... 6.19
Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................... 6.19
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................. 6.19
Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................... 6.19
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................... 6.19
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................... 6.19
1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from 2 See the Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 3 See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 89045, n.2,
the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the and accompanying Preliminary Decision
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014– Antidumping Duty Order on Diamond Sawblades Memorandum at 3.
2015, 81 FR 89045 (December 9, 2016) (Preliminary and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of 4 See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 89045, n.6,
China,’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum) dated
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision and accompanying Preliminary Decision
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
Memorandum. notice, at 4. Memorandum at 4–8.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_27023/page/1.svg)
![26914 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Notices
b. Differential Pricing Memorandum Opinion and Order alena.org/Home/Dispute-Settlement/
c. Value-Added Tax which affirmed in part and remanded in Decisions-and-Reports.
d. Surrogate Values part the Final Determination by
VII. Recommendation Dated: June 6, 2017.
Commerce. The Binational Panel Paul E. Morris,
[FR Doc. 2017–12106 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am] concluded and ordered that Commerce’s
U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Final Determination is remanded for
[FR Doc. 2017–12039 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
further consideration consistent with
the Panel’s decision with respect to (1) BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE the use of Commerce’s ‘‘concurrent
subsidies’’ methodology to analyze the
International Trade Administration DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
provision of ‘‘hot idle’’ funding to Port
North American Free Trade Agreement Hawkesbury Paper LLP (PHP) in a International Trade Administration
(NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel transaction between private parties; (2)
Review: Notice of NAFTA Panel Commerce’s conclusion that the [A–201–845]
Decision Government of Nova Scotia entrusted
and directed Nova Scotia Power, Inc. to Antidumping Suspension Agreement
AGENCY: United States Section, NAFTA make a financial contribution by on Sugar From Mexico: Rescission of
Secretariat, International Trade providing electricity; (3) Commerce’s 2014–2015 and 2015–2016
Administration, Department of conclusion that Nova Scotia Power, Inc. Administrative Reviews
Commerce. provided electricity for less than
ACTION: Notice of NAFTA Panel adequate remuneration, addressing both AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Decision in the matter of its conclusion that a Tier 1 benchmark International Trade Administration,
Supercalendered Paper from Canada: was not available and its calculation of Department of Commerce.
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty a Tier 3 benchmark; (4) the use of SUMMARY: On May 1, 2017, the
Determination (Secretariat File Number: Commerce’s ‘‘concurrent subsidies Department notified the producers/
USA–CDA–2015–1904–01). methodology’’ with respect to granting exporters that were signatories to the
of Forestry Infrastructure monies to New Agreement Suspending the
SUMMARY: On April 13, 2017, the Page Port Hawkesbury (NPPH) prior to Antidumping Duty Investigation on
Binational Panel issued its its acquisition by Pacific West sugar from Mexico (the AD Agreement)
Memorandum Opinion and Order in the Commercial Corporation (PWCC); (5) of its intent to terminate the AD
matter of Supercalendered Paper from Commerce’s statement that the Agreement unless a new agreement was
Canada: Final Affirmative administrative record contains no reached on or before June 5, 2017. The
Countervailing Duty Determination evidence of a hostile takeover of Fibrek Department subsequently modified its
(Final Determination). The Binational by Resolute; (6) Commerce’s failure to notice of intent to terminate the AD
Panel affirmed in part and remanded in examine whether the grants to Resolute Agreement, stating its continued intent
part the Final Determination by the under the Northern Industrial Electricity to terminate the AD Agreement unless
United States Department of Commerce Rate and Forestry Sector Prosperity an amended agreement was reached on
(Commerce) and copies of the NAFTA Funds programs were tied to the or before June 6, 2017. Because the
Panel Decision are available from the production of a particular product or to Department intends to terminate the AD
United States Section of the NAFTA the production of an input product; and Agreement, or, in the alternative, amend
Secretariat. (7) Commerce’s use of the same non- the AD Agreement prior to the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul recurring grant as the source for Adverse expiration of the termination period, the
E. Morris, United States Secretary, Facts Available for both recurring and two ongoing administrative reviews of
NAFTA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 non-recurring grants. the original AD Agreement are now
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, The Binational Panel ordered that to moot, and the Department is rescinding
DC 20230, (202) 482–5438. the extent not rendered moot by both administrative reviews.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter Commerce’s explanation on remand as DATES: Effective June 5, 2017.
19 of Article 1904 of NAFTA provides to why a Tier 1 benchmark for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
a dispute settlement mechanism measuring the adequacy of Sally C. Gannon or David Cordell,
involving trade remedy determinations remuneration of Port Hawkesbury’s Enforcement & Compliance,
issued by the Government of the United electricity was not available, International Trade Administration,
States, the Government of Canada, and Commerce’s October 21, 2016 motion U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
the Government of Mexico. Following a for a voluntary remand to consider Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
Request for Panel Review, a Binational whether Commerce should include a DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–0162 or
Panel is composed to review the trade separate component for return on equity (202) 482–0408.
remedy determination being challenged in its Tier 3 benchmark for measuring SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
and issue a binding Panel Decision. the adequacy of remuneration of Port
There are established NAFTA Rules of Hawkesbury’s electricity is granted, and Background
Procedure for Article 1904 Binational the calculation of the benchmark for Investigation and Issuance of the AD
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Panel Reviews (Rules) and the NAFTA such purchases is hereby remanded. Agreement
Panel Decision has been notified in The Binational Panel further ordered
accordance with Rule 70. For the that the Final Determination in all other On April 17, 2014, the Department
complete Rules, please see https:// respects is sustained and directed initiated an antidumping duty
www.nafta-sec-alena.org/Home/Texts- Commerce to submit its redetermination investigation under section 732 of the
of-the-Agreement/Rules-of-Procedure/ on remand within 75 days of the date Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
Article-1904. of issue of the NAFTA Panel Decision. to determine whether imports of sugar
Panel Decision: On April 13, 2017, the For the full Memorandum Opinion and from Mexico are being, or are likely to
Binational Panel issued its Order, please see https://www.nafta-sec- be, sold in the United States at less than
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_27023/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-06-10 01:40:52
Document Modified: 2017-06-10 01:40:52
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective June 12, 2017. | |
| Contact | Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5760 and (202) 482-3683, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 26912 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR