82 FR 26942 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 111 (June 12, 2017)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 111 (June 12, 2017)
| Page Range | 26942-26943 | |
| FR Document | 2017-12091 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 26942-26943] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-12091] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243. Project: Mental Health Block Grant Ten Percent Set Aside Evaluation of First Episode Psychosis--NEW The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) is directed by Congress through its FY 2016 Omnibus bill, Public Law 114-113, to set aside ten percent of the Mental Health Block Grant (MHBG) allocation for each state to support evidence-based programs that provide treatment for those with early serious mental illness (SMI) and a first episode psychosis (FEP)--an increase from the previous five percent set aside. The purpose of this 3-year evaluation is to assess the relationship between fidelity of selected coordinated specialty care (CSC) programs supported with Mental Health Block Grant (MHBG) Ten Percent Set Aside funding and participant outcomes. There are approximately 250 sites implementing CSC programs with MHBG ten percent set aside funding. All 250 sites will be asked to report on their implementation through an online survey. Up to 32 CSC sites across the nation will be recruited to participate in a process and outcome evaluation. The data collection activities for the Mental Health Block Grant Ten Percent Set Aside Evaluation will include the following six data collection tools:Site Survey: This is a one-time online survey with site directors of all 250 centers using MHBG ten percent set aside funding (not just those included in the evaluation). The survey focuses on how centers across the U.S. are providing services to individuals with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) in their communities. [[Page 26943]] State Mental Health Authority Interview: This is a one- time semi-structured interview with state mental health leadership in the states where the 32 sites in the evaluation are located. The interview focuses on their thoughts and opinions about context in which CSC programs are implemented within their state and the state's role in the implementation of the CSC programs. Agency Director/Administrator Interview: This semi- structured interview will be conducted twice with Agency Director/ Administrators at each of the 32 CSC sites in the evaluation about the successes and challenges involved in implementing the CSC program. Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) Staff Interview: This semi-structured interview will be conducted twice with CSC Staff at each of the 32 CSC sites in the evaluation about the successes and challenges involved in implementing the CSC program. Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) Participant Interview: This semi-structured interview will be conducted twice with participants involved in programs at the 32 CSC sites in the evaluation. The purpose of the interview is to gather participant input on how CSC programs are operating and their thoughts and opinions about successes and challenges while participating in the CSC program. Fidelity Interview: This interview will be conducted twice during the evaluation with up to four CSC staff at each site. The phone interview is designed to be used in conjunction with the First Episode Psychosis Fidelity Scale (FEPS-FS) to examine whether elements of CSC are implemented at the sites. In addition, each site will provide the evaluation team with administrative data on participant demographics and outcomes (e.g., employment status, educational status, diagnosis, living situation, quality of life, symptoms). Table 1--Estimated Burden Hours ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Number of Number of Total burden per Total burden Respondent respondents responses per responses response (in (in hours) respondent hours) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Department of Mental 32 1 32 2.0 64 Health Representative: Telephone Interview............ CSC Site Directors across the 250 1 250 0.2 50 country: Online survey......... Evaluation CSC Site: Program 64 1 64 2.0 128 Director on-site interview..... Evaluation CSC Site: Program 192 1 192 2.0 384 Staff on-site interview........ Evaluation CSC Site: Program 64 4 256 4.0 1,024 Staff Fidelity Telephone Interview...................... Evaluation CSC Site: Program 32 18 576 5.0 2,880 Staff data submission.......... Evaluation CSC Site: Program 128 1 128 1.0 128 Participant on-site interview.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total....................... 762 .............. 1,498 .............. 4,658 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent by July 12, 2017 to the SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB). To ensure timely receipt of comments, and to avoid potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, commenters are encouraged to submit their comments to OMB via email to: [email protected]. Although commenters are encouraged to send their comments via email, commenters may also fax their comments to: 202-395-7285. Commenters may also mail them to: Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, New Executive Office Building, Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503. Summer King, Statistician. [FR Doc. 2017-12091 Filed 6-9-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
![26942 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Notices
Project: Project—Division of State Monitoring data on SPF model will more targeted NOMs indicators
Programs—Management Reporting allow SAMHSA project officers to (Outcome);
Tool (DSP–MRT) (OMB No. 0930– systematically collect data to monitor • Number of grantees who integrate
0354)—Revision their grant program performance and Prescription Drug Monitoring Data into
outcomes along with grantee technical their program needs assessment.
The Substance Abuse and Mental assistance needs. In addition to Changes to this package include the
Health Services Administration assessing activities related to the SPF following:
(SAMHSA)’s Center for Substance steps, the performance monitoring • Standard language for all DSP–MRT
Abuse Prevention (CSAP) aims to instruments covered in this statement questions;
address two of SAMHSA’s top collect data to assess the following • New disparities module to align
substance abuse prevention priorities: grantee required specific performance with SAMHSA’s monitoring
Underage drinking (UAD; age 12 to 20) measures: requirements;
and prescription drug misuse and abuse • Number of training and technical • Updated technical assistance
(PDM; age 12 to 25) through the assistance activities per funded section;
Division of State Program—Monitoring community provided by the grantee to • Deletion of cost questions specific
and Reporting Tool. This data collection support communities; to funding amounts and in-kind
will allow all DSP programs to report • Reach of training and technical resources;
into a standard tool that aligns with the assistance activities (numbers served) • Deletion of advisory council and
Strategic Prevention Framework model. provided by the grantee; other workgroup sub-committee
This request for data collection includes • Percentage of subrecipient questions;
a revision from a previously approved communities that submit data to the • Addition of Section A specific to
OMB instrument formally known as grantee data system; SPF-Rx questions;
Partnerships for Success-Management • Number of sub-recipient • Addition of Section B specific to
and Reporting Tool. communities that improved on one or PDO questions;
ANNUALIZED DATA COLLECTION BURDEN
Responses Total
Number of Hours per Total burden
Instrument per number of
respondents response hours
respondent responses
Standard DSP Monitoring Tool ............................................ 117 4 468 3 1,404
Section A: Rx ....................................................................... 25 2 63 1 42
Section B: PDO .................................................................... 23 4 100 1 100
FY2020 Total ................................................................ 117 ........................ 631 ........................ 1,546
Written comments and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND serious mental illness (SMI) and a first
recommendations concerning the HUMAN SERVICES episode psychosis (FEP)—an increase
proposed information collection should from the previous five percent set aside.
be sent by July 12, 2017 to the SAMHSA Substance Abuse and Mental Health The purpose of this 3-year evaluation
Desk Officer at the Office of Information Services Administration is to assess the relationship between
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of fidelity of selected coordinated specialty
Agency Information Collection care (CSC) programs supported with
Management and Budget (OMB). To
Activities: Submission for OMB Mental Health Block Grant (MHBG) Ten
ensure timely receipt of comments, and Review; Comment Request
to avoid potential delays in OMB’s Percent Set Aside funding and
receipt and processing of mail sent participant outcomes. There are
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
through the U.S. Postal Service, approximately 250 sites implementing
Mental Health Services Administration
commenters are encouraged to submit CSC programs with MHBG ten percent
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
their comments to OMB via email to: set aside funding. All 250 sites will be
information collection requests under
asked to report on their implementation
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. OMB review, in compliance with the
through an online survey. Up to 32 CSC
Although commenters are encouraged to Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
sites across the nation will be recruited
send their comments via email, Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
to participate in a process and outcome
commenters may also fax their documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
evaluation. The data collection activities
comments to: 202–395–7285. Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
for the Mental Health Block Grant Ten
Commenters may also mail them to: Project: Mental Health Block Grant Ten Percent Set Aside Evaluation will
Office of Management and Budget, Percent Set Aside Evaluation of First include the following six data collection
Office of Information and Regulatory Episode Psychosis—NEW tools:
Affairs, New Executive Office Building,
• Site Survey: This is a one-time
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503. online survey with site directors of all
Health Services Administration
Summer King, (SAMHSA) is directed by Congress 250 centers using MHBG ten percent set
Statistician. through its FY 2016 Omnibus bill, aside funding (not just those included in
[FR Doc. 2017–12090 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
Public Law 114–113, to set aside ten the evaluation). The survey focuses on
percent of the Mental Health Block how centers across the U.S. are
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
Grant (MHBG) allocation for each state providing services to individuals with
to support evidence-based programs that First Episode Psychosis (FEP) in their
provide treatment for those with early communities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_27053/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Notices 26943
• State Mental Health Authority Interview: • Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) Staff • Fidelity Interview: This interview will be
This is a one-time semi-structured interview Interview: This semi-structured interview conducted twice during the evaluation with
with state mental health leadership in the will be conducted twice with CSC Staff at up to four CSC staff at each site. The phone
states where the 32 sites in the evaluation are each of the 32 CSC sites in the evaluation interview is designed to be used in
located. The interview focuses on their about the successes and challenges involved conjunction with the First Episode Psychosis
thoughts and opinions about context in in implementing the CSC program.
which CSC programs are implemented • Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) Fidelity Scale (FEPS–FS) to examine whether
within their state and the state’s role in the Participant Interview: This semi-structured elements of CSC are implemented at the sites.
implementation of the CSC programs. interview will be conducted twice with
• Agency Director/Administrator participants involved in programs at the 32 In addition, each site will provide the
Interview: This semi-structured interview CSC sites in the evaluation. The purpose of evaluation team with administrative
will be conducted twice with Agency the interview is to gather participant input on data on participant demographics and
Director/Administrators at each of the 32 how CSC programs are operating and their outcomes (e.g., employment status,
CSC sites in the evaluation about the thoughts and opinions about successes and educational status, diagnosis, living
successes and challenges involved in challenges while participating in the CSC
implementing the CSC program. program. situation, quality of life, symptoms).
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED BURDEN HOURS
Average
Number of
Number of Total burden per Total burden
Respondent responses per
respondents responses response (in hours)
respondent (in hours)
State Department of Mental Health Representative: Tele-
phone Interview ................................................................ 32 1 32 2.0 64
CSC Site Directors across the country: Online survey ....... 250 1 250 0.2 50
Evaluation CSC Site: Program Director on-site interview ... 64 1 64 2.0 128
Evaluation CSC Site: Program Staff on-site interview ........ 192 1 192 2.0 384
Evaluation CSC Site: Program Staff Fidelity Telephone
Interview ........................................................................... 64 4 256 4.0 1,024
Evaluation CSC Site: Program Staff data submission ........ 32 18 576 5.0 2,880
Evaluation CSC Site: Program Participant on-site interview 128 1 128 1.0 128
Total .............................................................................. 762 ........................ 1,498 ........................ 4,658
Written comments and INTERNATIONAL TRADE completed and filed its determination in
recommendations concerning the COMMISSION this review on June 6, 2017. The views
proposed information collection should of the Commission are contained in
[Investigation No. 731–TA–638 (Fourth
be sent by July 12, 2017 to the SAMHSA Review)]
USITC Publication 4695 (June 2017),
Desk Officer at the Office of Information entitled Stainless Steel Wire Rod from
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India India: Investigation No. 731–TA–638
Management and Budget (OMB). To (Fourth Review).
DETERMINATION
ensure timely receipt of comments, and By order of the Commission.
to avoid potential delays in OMB’s On the basis of the record 1 developed Issued: June 6, 2017.
receipt and processing of mail sent in the subject five-year review, the Lisa R. Barton,
through the U.S. Postal Service, United States International Trade Secretary to the Commission.
commenters are encouraged to submit Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
[FR Doc. 2017–12037 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
their comments to OMB via email to: determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
antidumping duty order on stainless
Although commenters are encouraged to
steel wire rod from India would be
send their comments via email, INTERNATIONAL TRADE
likely to lead to continuation or
commenters may also fax their COMMISSION
recurrence of material injury to an
comments to: 202–395–7285. industry in the United States within a [Investigation No. 337–TA–951]
Commenters may also mail them to: reasonably foreseeable time.
Office of Management and Budget, Certain Lithium Metal Oxide Cathode
Office of Information and Regulatory BACKGROUND Materials, Lithium-Ion Batteries for
Affairs, New Executive Office Building, The Commission, pursuant to section Power Tool Products Containing
Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503. 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), Same, and Power Tool Products With
instituted this review on December 1, Lithium-Ion Batteries Containing
Summer King, 2016 (81 FR 86728) and determined on Same; Notice of the Commission’s
Statistician. March 6, 2017 that it would conduct an Determination To Rescind a Limited
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2017–12091 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am] expedited review (82 FR 16231, April 3, Exclusion Order
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P 2017).
The Commission made this AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
determination pursuant to section Commission.
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It ACTION: Notice.
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 the U.S. International Trade
CFR 207.2(f)). Commission has determined to rescind
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Jun 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_27053/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2017-06-10 01:40:45
Document Modified: 2017-06-10 01:40:45
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 26942 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR