82_FR_27054 82 FR 26943 - Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India

82 FR 26943 - Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 111 (June 12, 2017)

Page Range26943-26943
FR Document2017-12037

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 111 (Monday, June 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 26943]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12037]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-638 (Fourth Review)]


Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India

DETERMINATION

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on stainless 
steel wire rod from India would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

BACKGROUND

    The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 
1675(c)), instituted this review on December 1, 2016 (81 FR 86728) and 
determined on March 6, 2017 that it would conduct an expedited review 
(82 FR 16231, April 3, 2017).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on June 6, 2017. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4695 (June 2017), 
entitled Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India: Investigation No. 731-TA-
638 (Fourth Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 6, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-12037 Filed 6-9-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 111 / Monday, June 12, 2017 / Notices                                                                           26943

                                                      • State Mental Health Authority Interview:                                 • Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) Staff                       • Fidelity Interview: This interview will be
                                                    This is a one-time semi-structured interview                               Interview: This semi-structured interview                      conducted twice during the evaluation with
                                                    with state mental health leadership in the                                 will be conducted twice with CSC Staff at                      up to four CSC staff at each site. The phone
                                                    states where the 32 sites in the evaluation are                            each of the 32 CSC sites in the evaluation                     interview is designed to be used in
                                                    located. The interview focuses on their                                    about the successes and challenges involved                    conjunction with the First Episode Psychosis
                                                    thoughts and opinions about context in                                     in implementing the CSC program.
                                                    which CSC programs are implemented                                           • Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC)                           Fidelity Scale (FEPS–FS) to examine whether
                                                    within their state and the state’s role in the                             Participant Interview: This semi-structured                    elements of CSC are implemented at the sites.
                                                    implementation of the CSC programs.                                        interview will be conducted twice with
                                                      • Agency Director/Administrator                                          participants involved in programs at the 32                       In addition, each site will provide the
                                                    Interview: This semi-structured interview                                  CSC sites in the evaluation. The purpose of                    evaluation team with administrative
                                                    will be conducted twice with Agency                                        the interview is to gather participant input on                data on participant demographics and
                                                    Director/Administrators at each of the 32                                  how CSC programs are operating and their                       outcomes (e.g., employment status,
                                                    CSC sites in the evaluation about the                                      thoughts and opinions about successes and                      educational status, diagnosis, living
                                                    successes and challenges involved in                                       challenges while participating in the CSC
                                                    implementing the CSC program.                                              program.                                                       situation, quality of life, symptoms).

                                                                                                                               TABLE 1—ESTIMATED BURDEN HOURS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Average
                                                                                                                                                                     Number of
                                                                                                                                                  Number of                                      Total           burden per              Total burden
                                                                                       Respondent                                                                  responses per
                                                                                                                                                 respondents                                  responses           response                (in hours)
                                                                                                                                                                     respondent                                   (in hours)

                                                    State Department of Mental Health Representative: Tele-
                                                      phone Interview ................................................................                        32                        1              32                       2.0                64
                                                    CSC Site Directors across the country: Online survey .......                                             250                        1             250                       0.2                50
                                                    Evaluation CSC Site: Program Director on-site interview ...                                               64                        1              64                       2.0               128
                                                    Evaluation CSC Site: Program Staff on-site interview ........                                            192                        1             192                       2.0               384
                                                    Evaluation CSC Site: Program Staff Fidelity Telephone
                                                      Interview ...........................................................................                   64                       4              256                       4.0             1,024
                                                    Evaluation CSC Site: Program Staff data submission ........                                               32                      18              576                       5.0             2,880
                                                    Evaluation CSC Site: Program Participant on-site interview                                               128                       1              128                       1.0               128

                                                          Total ..............................................................................               762   ........................         1,498     ........................          4,658



                                                      Written comments and                                                     INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                            completed and filed its determination in
                                                    recommendations concerning the                                             COMMISSION                                                     this review on June 6, 2017. The views
                                                    proposed information collection should                                                                                                    of the Commission are contained in
                                                                                                                               [Investigation No. 731–TA–638 (Fourth
                                                    be sent by July 12, 2017 to the SAMHSA                                     Review)]
                                                                                                                                                                                              USITC Publication 4695 (June 2017),
                                                    Desk Officer at the Office of Information                                                                                                 entitled Stainless Steel Wire Rod from
                                                    and Regulatory Affairs, Office of                                          Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India                            India: Investigation No. 731–TA–638
                                                    Management and Budget (OMB). To                                                                                                           (Fourth Review).
                                                                                                                               DETERMINATION
                                                    ensure timely receipt of comments, and                                                                                                      By order of the Commission.
                                                    to avoid potential delays in OMB’s                                            On the basis of the record 1 developed                        Issued: June 6, 2017.
                                                    receipt and processing of mail sent                                        in the subject five-year review, the                           Lisa R. Barton,
                                                    through the U.S. Postal Service,                                           United States International Trade                              Secretary to the Commission.
                                                    commenters are encouraged to submit                                        Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
                                                                                                                                                                                              [FR Doc. 2017–12037 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]
                                                    their comments to OMB via email to:                                        determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
                                                                                                                                                                                              BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                                                                                               1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
                                                    OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
                                                                                                                               antidumping duty order on stainless
                                                    Although commenters are encouraged to
                                                                                                                               steel wire rod from India would be
                                                    send their comments via email,                                                                                                            INTERNATIONAL TRADE
                                                                                                                               likely to lead to continuation or
                                                    commenters may also fax their                                                                                                             COMMISSION
                                                                                                                               recurrence of material injury to an
                                                    comments to: 202–395–7285.                                                 industry in the United States within a                         [Investigation No. 337–TA–951]
                                                    Commenters may also mail them to:                                          reasonably foreseeable time.
                                                    Office of Management and Budget,                                                                                                          Certain Lithium Metal Oxide Cathode
                                                    Office of Information and Regulatory                                       BACKGROUND                                                     Materials, Lithium-Ion Batteries for
                                                    Affairs, New Executive Office Building,                                      The Commission, pursuant to section                          Power Tool Products Containing
                                                    Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.                                          751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)),                         Same, and Power Tool Products With
                                                                                                                               instituted this review on December 1,                          Lithium-Ion Batteries Containing
                                                    Summer King,                                                               2016 (81 FR 86728) and determined on                           Same; Notice of the Commission’s
                                                    Statistician.                                                              March 6, 2017 that it would conduct an                         Determination To Rescind a Limited
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES




                                                    [FR Doc. 2017–12091 Filed 6–9–17; 8:45 am]                                 expedited review (82 FR 16231, April 3,                        Exclusion Order
                                                    BILLING CODE 4162–20–P                                                     2017).
                                                                                                                                 The Commission made this                                     AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
                                                                                                                               determination pursuant to section                              Commission.
                                                                                                                               751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It                      ACTION: Notice.

                                                                                                                                 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
                                                                                                                                                                                              SUMMARY:   Notice is hereby given that
                                                                                                                               Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19               the U.S. International Trade
                                                                                                                               CFR 207.2(f)).                                                 Commission has determined to rescind


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014        17:28 Jun 09, 2017         Jkt 241001       PO 00000        Frm 00041   Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703     E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM      12JNN1



Document Created: 2017-06-10 01:40:28
Document Modified: 2017-06-10 01:40:28
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation82 FR 26943 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR