82 FR 27144 - Spirotetramat; Pesticide Tolerances
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 113 (June 14, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 113 (June 14, 2017)
| Page Range | 27144-27149 | |
| FR Document | 2017-12348 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 14, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 27144-27149] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-12348] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0255; FRL-9961-95] Spirotetramat; Pesticide Tolerances AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of spirotetramat in or on multiple commodities which are identified and discussed later in this document. In addition, this regulation removes several previously established tolerances that are superseded by this final rule. Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) and Bayer CropScience, requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). DATES: This regulation is effective June 14, 2017. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before August 14, 2017, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0255, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Goodis, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:Crop production (NAICS code 111). Animal production (NAICS code 112). Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). B. How can I get electronic access to other related information? You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl. C. How can I file an objection or hearing request? Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0255 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before August 14, 2017. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b). In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0255, by one of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance In the Federal Register of Wednesday, June 22, 2016 (81 FR 40594) (FRL-9947-32) and Monday, August 29, 2016 (81 FR 59165) (FRL-9950-22), EPA issued documents pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), [[Page 27145]] announcing the filing of pesticide petitions (PPs) by IR-4 (PP 6E8467); and Bayer CropScience (PP 6F8461). These petitions request that 40 CFR 180.641 be amended by establishing tolerances for residues of the insecticide spirotetramat, (cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-8-methoxy-2-oxo- 1-azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl-ethyl carbonate) and its metabolites cis- 3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1-azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-2- one, cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-3-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1- azaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione, cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-8-methoxy-2- oxo-1-azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl beta-D-glucopyranoside, and cis-3- (2,5-dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1-azaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one, calculated as the stoichiometric equivalent of spirotetramat, in or on several commodities as follows: Pesticide petition 6E8467 submitted by IR-4 Project Headquarters, 500 College Road East, Suite 201 W., Princeton, NJ 08540 requests tolerances for carrot, roots at 0.15 parts per million (ppm); fruit, stone, group 12-12 at 4.5 ppm; and nut, tree, group 14-12 at 0.25 ppm. Pesticide petition 6F8461 submitted by Bayer CropScience, P.O. Box 12014, 2 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 requests tolerances on sugar beet, molasses at 0.20 ppm and sugar beet, root at 0.15 ppm. Summaries of the petitions prepared by the registrant, Bayer CropScience, are available in the docket, http://www.regulations.gov under document ID EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0255. One comment was received in response to the notices of filings. EPA's response to the comment is discussed in Unit IV.C. Based upon review of the data supporting the petitions, EPA has revised the tolerance levels for several proposed commodities and corrected several commodity listings. The reason for these changes are explained in Unit IV.D. III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .'' Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on aggregate exposure for spirotetramat including exposure resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with spirotetramat follows. A. Toxicological Profile EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children. The target organs of toxicity following subchronic and chronic oral exposures to spirotetramat were different in rats and dogs. The thyroid and thymus glands were the target organs identified in subchronic and chronic toxicity studies in dogs while the testes were the target organs identified in rats. The dog was the most sensitive species, and in both rats and dogs, males were more sensitive than females. The thyroid effects in the dog consisted of lower circulating levels of thyroid hormones (T3 and/or T4) along with a reduction in follicle size, a possible indication of reduced amount of colloid. In all dog studies, thymus effects were observed (reduced size, atrophy). In the one-year study, this was described microscopically as involution. In rats, reported testicular effects consisted of abnormal spermatozoa and hypospermia in the epididymis, decreased testicular weights, and testicular degenerative vacuolation. An investigative subchronic study where rats were dosed with a primary enol metabolite of spirotetramat reproduced the same testicular effects as the parent chemical, suggesting that this metabolite is, at minimum, a primary contributor to the observed male reproductive toxicity. Consistent with this notion, orally administered spirotetramat was demonstrated in rats to be extensively metabolized, and males were noted to achieve much higher systemic exposures than their female counterparts, which helps explain the higher sensitivity of males. Other effects reported in a rat chronic toxicity study were associated with kidney effects consisting of decreased organ weight and tubular dilatation. In one- and two-generation rat reproductive toxicity studies, male reproductive toxicity (abnormal sperm cells and reproductive performance) similar to that reported in subchronic toxicity studies with adult rats was reported in the first generation (F 1 ) males at relatively high dose levels. In all cases, a well-defined no- observed adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was established. There was evidence of increased qualitative susceptibility in the rat developmental study with reduced fetal weight and increased incidences of malformations and skeletal deviations observed at the limit dose, while maternal effects at this dose consisted of only body- weight decrements. There was no evidence of increased quantitative or qualitative susceptibility to offspring following pre- or post-natal exposure to spirotetramat in the rabbit developmental or two-generation reproduction studies. The only evidence of neurotoxicity in the rat acute neurotoxicity study was based on decreased motor and locomotor activity, which occurred only at relatively high dose levels. The rat subchronic neurotoxicity (SCN) study does not indicate a concern for neurotoxicity, even at relatively high dose levels. The results of an immunotoxicity study in rats do not indicate any functional deficits in immune function. There is no evidence of carcinogenicity in chronic toxicity/ carcinogenicity studies performed in rats and mice. Spirotetramat has been classified as ``not likely to be carcinogenic to humans'' based on lack of evidence for carcinogenicity in rodent studies. Spirotetramat was also negative for mutagenicity and clastogenicity in in vivo and in vitro assays. Specific information on the studies received and the nature of the adverse effects caused by spirotetramat as well as the no-observed- adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect- level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies can be found at http://www.regulations.gov in document: ``Spirotetramat. Human Health Risk Assessment for the Tolerance Petition for Residues in/on Sugar Beet and Carrot and Crop Group Conversions for [[Page 27146]] Tree Nut Group 14-12 and Fruit, Stone, Group 12-12.'' at pages 25-30 in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0255. B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete description of the risk assessment process, see http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-human-health-risk-pesticides. A summary of the toxicological endpoints for spirotetramat used for human risk assessment is discussed in Unit III. B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern of the final rule published in the Federal Register of Tuesday, October 25, 2016 (81 FR 73342) (FRL-89951- 80). C. Exposure Assessment 1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary exposure to spirotetramat, EPA considered exposure under the petitioned-for tolerances as well as all existing spirotetramat tolerances in 40 CFR 180.641. EPA assessed dietary exposures from spirotetramat in food as follows: i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring as a result of a 1-day or single exposure. Such effects were identified for spirotetramat. In estimating acute dietary exposure, EPA used food consumption data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA's) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, What We Eat in America (NHANES/WWEIA) from 2003 through 2008. As to residue levels in food, EPA assumed tolerance-level residues, 100 percent crop treated (PCT) information for all commodities and Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model (DEEM) 7.81 default processing factors where available. ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure assessment EPA used the food consumption data from the USDA's 2003-2008 NHANES/WWEIA. As to residue levels in food, EPA used 100 PCT, average field trial residues for some commodities, and tolerance-level residues for the remaining commodities. iii. Cancer. Based on the data summarized in Unit III.A., EPA has concluded that spirotetramat does not pose a cancer risk to humans. Therefore, a dietary exposure assessment for the purpose of assessing cancer risk is unnecessary. iv. Anticipated residue and percent crop treated (PCT) information. Section 408(b)(2)(E) of FFDCA authorizes EPA to use available data and information on the anticipated residue levels of pesticide residues in food and the actual levels of pesticide residues that have been measured in food. If EPA relies on such information, EPA must require pursuant to FFDCA section 408(f)(1) that data be provided 5 years after the tolerance is established, modified, or left in effect, demonstrating that the levels in food are not above the levels anticipated. For the present action, EPA will issue such data call-ins as are required by FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(E) and authorized under FFDCA section 408(f)(1). Data will be required to be submitted no later than 5 years from the date of issuance of these tolerances. The Agency did not use percent crop treated estimates. 2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency used screening level water exposure models in the dietary exposure analysis and risk assessment for spirotetramat in drinking water. These simulation models take into account data on the physical, chemical, and fate/transport characteristics of spirotetramat. Further information regarding EPA drinking water models used in pesticide exposure assessment can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/about-water-exposure-models-used-pesticide. Based on the Tier 1 Rice Model and Pesticide Root Zone Model Ground Water (PRZM GW), the estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) of spirotetramat and its metabolites and degradates of concern for acute exposures are estimated to be 395 parts per billion (ppb) for surface water and 7.99 ppb for ground water. Chronic exposures for non-cancer assessments are estimated to be 395 ppb for surface water and 5.36 ppb for ground water. Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly entered into the dietary exposure model. For both acute and chronic dietary risk assessment, the water concentration value of 395 ppb was used to assess the contribution to drinking water. 3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control, termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets). Spirotetramat is currently registered for the following uses that could result in residential exposures: Citrus trees grown in residential areas and turf grass including sod farm and golf course turf only. There is the potential for post-application dermal exposure from both residential citrus tree and golf course uses. The golf course use could result in potential post-application dermal exposure; however, there is no dermal hazard and therefore, quantification of dermal risk is not necessary. For the residential citrus tree use, because the product is sold in bulk packaging for agricultural uses and the label requires that handlers wear specific clothing (e.g., long- sleeve shirt/long pants) and the use of personal-protective equipment (e.g., gloves), based on current Agency policy, EPA has made the assumption that this product is not meant for homeowner use, and therefore, there is no need to conduct a quantitative residential handler assessment. Further information regarding EPA standard assumptions and generic inputs for residential exposures may be found at http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/standard-operating-procedures-residential-pesticide. 4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.'' [[Page 27147]] Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to spirotetramat and any other substances and spirotetramat does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that spirotetramat has a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's Web site at: http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides. D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children 1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a different factor. 2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. There is no evidence of quantitative susceptibility of offspring following pre- or postnatal exposure to spirotetramat. There is evidence of qualitative susceptibility in the rat developmental study, where developmental effects, including reduced fetal weight and increased incidences of malformations and skeletal deviations, were observed in the presence of body weight decrements in maternal animals. However, concern is low since effects were only seen at the limit dose and selected endpoints are protective of the observed effects. 3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show the safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the FQPA SF were reduced to 1X. That decision is based on the following findings: i. The toxicity database for spirotetramat is complete. ii. Although spirotetramat was shown to elicit neurotoxic response in the acute neurotoxicity study; however, concern is low since the effects are well-characterized with clearly established NOAEL/LOAEL values, the selected endpoints are protective of the observed neurotoxic effect, there are no neurotoxic effects seen in the subchronic neurotoxicity study, and the existing toxicological database indicates that spirotetramat is not a neurotoxic chemical. iii. There is no evidence of quantitative susceptibility of offspring following pre- or postnatal exposure. There is evidence of qualitative susceptibility in the rat developmental study; however, there is no residual uncertainty concerning these effects due to the clear NOAEL/LOAELs in the study for these effects. Moreover, concern for these effects is low since effects were only seen at the limit dose, effects were seen in the presence of maternal toxicity, and selected endpoints are protective of the observed effects. iv. There are no residual uncertainties identified in the exposure databases. The acute dietary food and drinking water exposure assessment utilizes tolerance-level residues and 100 PCT information for all commodities. The chronic dietary food and drinking water exposure assessment utilizes average field trial residues for some commodities, tolerance-level residues for the remaining commodities, and 100 PCT. The chronic assessment is somewhat refined; however, since it is based on reliable data, it will not underestimate exposure and risk. There are no quantifiable potential exposure/risks from residential citrus tree and golf course uses. The drinking water assessments provide conservative, health-protective, high-end estimates of water concentrations that will not likely be exceeded. These assessments will not underestimate the exposure and risks posed by spirotetramat. E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an adequate MOE exists. 1. Acute risk. Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this unit for acute exposure, the acute dietary exposure from food and water to spirotetramat will occupy 16% of the aPAD for children 1-2 years old, the population group receiving the greatest exposure. 2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that chronic exposure to spirotetramat from food and water will utilize 77% of the cPAD for children 1-2 years old, the population group receiving the greatest exposure. 3. Short- and Intermediate-term risks. Short- and intermediate-term aggregate exposures take into account short- and intermediate-term residential exposures plus chronic exposure to food and water (considered to be a background exposure level). A short- and intermediate-term inhalation adverse effect was identified; however, spirotetramat is not registered for any use patterns that would result in either short- or intermediate-term inhalation residential exposure. In a dermal toxicity study, no evidence of dermal hazard was found; therefore, dermal risk was not included in the aggregate assessment. Short- and intermediate-term aggregate risks are assessed based on short- and intermediate-term residential exposures plus chronic dietary exposure. Because there is no short- or intermediate-term residential exposure and chronic dietary exposure has already been assessed under the appropriately protective cPAD (which is at least as protective as the POD used to assess short-term risk), no further assessment of short- or intermediate-term risk is necessary, and EPA relies on the chronic dietary risk assessment for evaluating short- and intermediate- term risks for spirotetramat. 4. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. Based on the lack of evidence of carcinogenicity in two adequate rodent carcinogenicity studies, spirotetramat is not expected to pose a cancer risk to humans. 5. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate exposure to spirotetramat residues. IV. Other Considerations A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology Adequate enforcement methodology (high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS)) is available to enforce the tolerance expression. [[Page 27148]] The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905; email address: [email protected]. B. International Residue Limits In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain the reasons for departing from the Codex level. The Codex has not established a MRL for spirotetramat. C. Response to Comments One comment was received from an anonymous source requesting that the Agency deny IR-4's petition for use of spirotetramat on all food items claiming it is a toxic chemical and its use would result in harm to humans. The Agency's Response: The Agency recognizes that some individuals believe that certain pesticides are ``toxic chemicals'' that should not be permitted in our food; however, the commenter provided no information demonstrating toxicity of spirotetramat or that EPA could use to evaluate the safety of the pesticide. The existing legal framework provided by section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) states that tolerances may be set when persons seeking such tolerances or exemptions have demonstrated that the pesticide meets the safety standard imposed by that statute. When new or amended tolerances are requested for residues of a pesticide in food or feed, the Agency, as is required by Section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), estimates the risk of the potential exposure to these residues. The Agency has concluded after this risk assessment, which includes the consideration of long-term animal studies with spirotetramat, that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate human exposure to spirotetramat and that, accordingly, the use of spirotetramat on petitioned-for food commodities is ``safe.'' D. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances Based on available residue data, EPA is establishing tolerance level on sugar beet molasses at 0.30 ppm instead of 0.20 ppm, to cover anticipated residues. In addition, EPA corrected the commodity terminology for ``sugar beet root'' and ``sugar beet molasses'' to ``beet, sugar, roots'' and ``beet, sugar, molasses,'' respectively, in order to conform to terms used in the Agency's Food and Feed Commodity Vocabulary. V. Conclusion Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of spirotetramat, (cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-8-methoxy-2-oxo-1- azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl-ethyl carbonate) and its metabolites cis-3- (2,5-dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1-azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-2-one, cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-3-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1-azaspiro[4.5]decane- 2,4-dione, cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-8-methoxy-2-oxo-1- azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl beta-D-glucopyranoside, and cis-3-(2,5- dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1-azaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one, calculated as the stoichiometric equivalent of spirotetramat, in or on beet, sugar, molasses at 0.30 ppm; beet, sugar, roots at 0.15 ppm; carrot, roots at 0.15 ppm; fruit, stone, group 12-12 at 4.5 ppm; and nut, tree, group 14-12 at 0.25 ppm. In addition, EPA is revoking the existing tolerances for fruit, stone, group 12 and nut, tree, group 14 as they are superseded by the new tolerances for groups 12-12 and 14-12 established under this final rule. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). VII. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). [[Page 27149]] List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: May 8, 2017. Michael Goodis, Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows: PART 180--[AMENDED] 0 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 0 2. In Sec. 180.641, in the table in paragraph (a)(1): 0 i. Add alphabetically the entries: ``Beet, sugar, molasses''; ``Beet, sugar, roots''; ``Carrot, roots''; ``Fruit, stone, group 12-12''; and ``Nut, tree, group 14-12''; and 0 ii. Remove entries for ``Fruit, stone, group 12'' and ``Nut, tree, group 14''. The additions read as follows: Sec. 180.641 Spirotetramat; tolerances for residues. (a) * * * (1) * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Parts per Commodity million ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * Beet, sugar, molasses....................................... 0.30 Beet, sugar, roots.......................................... 0.15 * * * * * Carrot, roots............................................... 0.15 * * * * * Fruit, stone, group 12-12................................... 4.5 * * * * * Nut, tree, group 14-12...................................... 0.25 * * * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * [FR Doc. 2017-12348 Filed 6-13-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![27144 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 14, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Æ Also, changed the note to paragraph under the Federal Food, Drug, and site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-
(b): To replace ‘‘Material Safety Data Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
Sheets’’ with ‘‘Safety Data Sheets DATES: This regulation is effective June 40tab_02.tpl.
(SDS);’’ and 14, 2017. Objections and requests for
• § 68.67 Process hazard analysis— C. How can I file an objection or hearing
hearings must be received on or before request?
revised to require that the PHA must August 14, 2017, and must be filed in
now address the findings from all accordance with the instructions Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
incident investigations required under provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
§ 68.81, as well as any other potential Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY objection to any aspect of this regulation
failure scenarios. INFORMATION).
and may also request a hearing on those
The only major rule provision that objections. You must file your objection
would be affected by this rule (because ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, or request a hearing on this regulation
its March 14, 2018 compliance date is identified by docket identification (ID) in accordance with the instructions
before the delayed effective date of this number EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0255, is provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
rule) is the emergency response available at http://www.regulations.gov proper receipt by EPA, you must
coordination provision, which has an or at the Office of Pesticide Programs identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
estimated annualized cost of $16 M.22 23 Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) OPP–2016–0255 in the subject line on
Therefore, based on the costs of the in the Environmental Protection Agency the first page of your submission. All
provisions that would be affected by Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William objections and requests for a hearing
this action, EPA has concluded that this Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 must be in writing, and must be
action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC received by the Hearing Clerk on or
by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room before August 14, 2017. Addresses for
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., mail and hand delivery of objections
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 68 Monday through Friday, excluding legal and hearing requests are provided in 40
Environmental protection, holidays. The telephone number for the CFR 178.25(b).
Administrative practice and procedure, Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, In addition to filing an objection or
Air pollution control, Chemicals, and the telephone number for the OPP hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
Hazardous substances, Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting the visitor instructions and additional submit a copy of the filing (excluding
and recordkeeping requirements. information about the docket available any Confidential Business Information
Dated: June 9, 2017. at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
E. Scott Pruitt, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information not marked confidential
Administrator. Michael Goodis, Registration Division pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
[FR Doc. 2017–12340 Filed 6–13–17; 8:45 am] (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, objection or hearing request, identified
DC 20460–0001; telephone number: by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (703) 305–7090; email address: 2016–0255, by one of the following
AGENCY jackson.sidney@epa.gov. methods:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
40 CFR Part 180 www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
I. General Information instructions for submitting comments.
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0255; FRL–9961–95]
A. Does this action apply to me? Do not submit electronically any
Spirotetramat; Pesticide Tolerances information you consider to be CBI or
You may be potentially affected by other information whose disclosure is
AGENCY: Environmental Protection this action if you are an agricultural restricted by statute.
Agency (EPA). producer, food manufacturer, or • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
ACTION: Final rule. pesticide manufacturer. The following Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
list of North American Industrial DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes Classification System (NAICS) codes is NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
tolerances for residues of spirotetramat not intended to be exhaustive, but rather • Hand Delivery: To make special
in or on multiple commodities which provides a guide to help readers arrangements for hand delivery or
are identified and discussed later in this determine whether this document delivery of boxed information, please
document. In addition, this regulation applies to them. Potentially affected follow the instructions at http://
removes several previously established entities may include: www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
tolerances that are superseded by this • Crop production (NAICS code 111). Additional instructions on
final rule. Interregional Research Project • Animal production (NAICS code commenting or visiting the docket,
Number 4 (IR–4) and Bayer 112). along with more information about
CropScience, requested these tolerances • Food manufacturing (NAICS code dockets generally, is available at http://
311). www.epa.gov/dockets.
22 See EPA, Regulatory Impact Analysis,
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk
code 32532). II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act, Tolerance
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Section 112(r)(7), December 16, 2016, pp 71, Docket B. How can I get electronic access to
ID No. EPA–HQ–OEM–2015–0725. In the Federal Register of Wednesday,
23 The new compliance date for the emergency other related information? June 22, 2016 (81 FR 40594) (FRL–
response coordination provision will be February You may access a frequently updated 9947–32) and Monday, August 29, 2016
19, 2019, unless we propose and finalize a revised
compliance date in conjunction with future
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance (81 FR 59165) (FRL–9950–22), EPA
revisions to the Risk Management Program regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through issued documents pursuant to FFDCA
Amendments. the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3),
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Jun 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM 14JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_27257/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 14, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 27145
announcing the filing of pesticide occupational exposure. Section demonstrated in rats to be extensively
petitions (PPs) by IR–4 (PP 6E8467); and 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to metabolized, and males were noted to
Bayer CropScience (PP 6F8461). These give special consideration to exposure achieve much higher systemic
petitions request that 40 CFR 180.641 be of infants and children to the pesticide exposures than their female
amended by establishing tolerances for chemical residue in establishing a counterparts, which helps explain the
residues of the insecticide spirotetramat, tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a higher sensitivity of males. Other effects
(cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-8-methoxy- reasonable certainty that no harm will reported in a rat chronic toxicity study
2-oxo-1-azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl-ethyl result to infants and children from were associated with kidney effects
carbonate) and its metabolites cis-3-(2,5- aggregate exposure to the pesticide consisting of decreased organ weight
dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8-methoxy- chemical residue. . . .’’ and tubular dilatation.
1-azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-2-one, cis-3- Consistent with FFDCA section In one- and two-generation rat
(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-3-hydroxy-8- 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in reproductive toxicity studies, male
methoxy-1-azaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4- FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reproductive toxicity (abnormal sperm
dione, cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-8- reviewed the available scientific data cells and reproductive performance)
methoxy-2-oxo-1-azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en- and other relevant information in similar to that reported in subchronic
4-yl beta-D-glucopyranoside, and cis-3- support of this action. EPA has toxicity studies with adult rats was
(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8- sufficient data to assess the hazards of reported in the first generation (F1)
methoxy-1-azaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one, and to make a determination on males at relatively high dose levels. In
calculated as the stoichiometric aggregate exposure for spirotetramat all cases, a well-defined no-observed
equivalent of spirotetramat, in or on including exposure resulting from the adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was
several commodities as follows: tolerances established by this action. established.
Pesticide petition 6E8467 submitted EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks There was evidence of increased
by IR–4 Project Headquarters, 500 associated with spirotetramat follows. qualitative susceptibility in the rat
College Road East, Suite 201 W., developmental study with reduced fetal
A. Toxicological Profile weight and increased incidences of
Princeton, NJ 08540 requests tolerances
for carrot, roots at 0.15 parts per million EPA has evaluated the available malformations and skeletal deviations
(ppm); fruit, stone, group 12–12 at 4.5 toxicity data and considered its validity, observed at the limit dose, while
ppm; and nut, tree, group 14–12 at 0.25 completeness, and reliability as well as maternal effects at this dose consisted of
ppm. the relationship of the results of the only body-weight decrements. There
Pesticide petition 6F8461 submitted studies to human risk. EPA has also was no evidence of increased
by Bayer CropScience, P.O. Box 12014, considered available information quantitative or qualitative susceptibility
2 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research concerning the variability of the to offspring following pre- or post-natal
Triangle Park, NC 27709 requests sensitivities of major identifiable exposure to spirotetramat in the rabbit
tolerances on sugar beet, molasses at subgroups of consumers, including developmental or two-generation
0.20 ppm and sugar beet, root at 0.15 infants and children. reproduction studies.
ppm. The target organs of toxicity following The only evidence of neurotoxicity in
Summaries of the petitions prepared subchronic and chronic oral exposures the rat acute neurotoxicity study was
by the registrant, Bayer CropScience, are to spirotetramat were different in rats based on decreased motor and
available in the docket, http:// and dogs. The thyroid and thymus locomotor activity, which occurred only
www.regulations.gov under document glands were the target organs identified at relatively high dose levels. The rat
ID EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0255. One in subchronic and chronic toxicity subchronic neurotoxicity (SCN) study
comment was received in response to studies in dogs while the testes were the does not indicate a concern for
the notices of filings. EPA’s response to target organs identified in rats. The dog neurotoxicity, even at relatively high
the comment is discussed in Unit IV.C. was the most sensitive species, and in dose levels. The results of an
Based upon review of the data both rats and dogs, males were more immunotoxicity study in rats do not
supporting the petitions, EPA has sensitive than females. The thyroid indicate any functional deficits in
revised the tolerance levels for several effects in the dog consisted of lower immune function.
proposed commodities and corrected circulating levels of thyroid hormones There is no evidence of
several commodity listings. The reason (T3 and/or T4) along with a reduction carcinogenicity in chronic toxicity/
for these changes are explained in Unit in follicle size, a possible indication of carcinogenicity studies performed in
IV.D. reduced amount of colloid. In all dog rats and mice. Spirotetramat has been
studies, thymus effects were observed classified as ‘‘not likely to be
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and (reduced size, atrophy). In the one-year carcinogenic to humans’’ based on lack
Determination of Safety study, this was described of evidence for carcinogenicity in rodent
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA microscopically as involution. studies. Spirotetramat was also negative
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the In rats, reported testicular effects for mutagenicity and clastogenicity in in
legal limit for a pesticide chemical consisted of abnormal spermatozoa and vivo and in vitro assays.
residue in or on a food) only if EPA hypospermia in the epididymis, Specific information on the studies
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’ decreased testicular weights, and received and the nature of the adverse
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA testicular degenerative vacuolation. An effects caused by spirotetramat as well
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a investigative subchronic study where as the no-observed-adverse-effect-level
reasonable certainty that no harm will rats were dosed with a primary enol (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
result from aggregate exposure to the metabolite of spirotetramat reproduced adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the
pesticide chemical residue, including the same testicular effects as the parent toxicity studies can be found at http://
all anticipated dietary exposures and all chemical, suggesting that this metabolite www.regulations.gov in document:
other exposures for which there is is, at minimum, a primary contributor to ‘‘Spirotetramat. Human Health Risk
reliable information.’’ This includes the observed male reproductive toxicity. Assessment for the Tolerance Petition
exposure through drinking water and in Consistent with this notion, orally for Residues in/on Sugar Beet and
residential settings, but does not include administered spirotetramat was Carrot and Crop Group Conversions for
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Jun 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM 14JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_27257/page/2.svg)
![27148 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 14, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
The method may be requested from: harm will result from aggregate human April 23, 1997). This action does not
Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch, exposure to spirotetramat and that, contain any information collections
Environmental Science Center, 701 accordingly, the use of spirotetramat on subject to OMB approval under the
Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350; petitioned-for food commodities is Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
telephone number: (410) 305–2905; ‘‘safe.’’ U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
email address: residuemethods@ any special considerations under
D. Revisions to Petitioned-For
epa.gov. Executive Order 12898, entitled
Tolerances
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
B. International Residue Limits Based on available residue data, EPA Environmental Justice in Minority
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA is establishing tolerance level on sugar Populations and Low-Income
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with beet molasses at 0.30 ppm instead of Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
international standards whenever 0.20 ppm, to cover anticipated residues. 1994).
possible, consistent with U.S. food In addition, EPA corrected the Since tolerances and exemptions that
safety standards and agricultural commodity terminology for ‘‘sugar beet are established on the basis of a petition
practices. EPA considers the root’’ and ‘‘sugar beet molasses’’ to under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
international maximum residue limits ‘‘beet, sugar, roots’’ and ‘‘beet, sugar, the tolerance in this final rule, do not
(MRLs) established by the Codex molasses,’’ respectively, in order to require the issuance of a proposed rule,
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as conform to terms used in the Agency’s the requirements of the Regulatory
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). Food and Feed Commodity Vocabulary. Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint seq.), do not apply.
V. Conclusion
United Nations Food and Agriculture This action directly regulates growers,
Organization/World Health Therefore, tolerances are established food processors, food handlers, and food
Organization food standards program, for residues of spirotetramat, (cis-3-(2,5- retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
and it is recognized as an international dimethylphenyl)-8-methoxy-2-oxo-1- this action alter the relationships or
food safety standards-setting azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl-ethyl distribution of power and
organization in trade agreements to carbonate) and its metabolites cis-3-(2,5- responsibilities established by Congress
which the United States is a party. EPA dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8-methoxy- in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
may establish a tolerance that is 1-azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-2-one, cis-3- section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
different from a Codex MRL; however, (2,5-dimethylphenyl)-3-hydroxy-8- has determined that this action will not
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that methoxy-1-azaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4- have a substantial direct effect on States
EPA explain the reasons for departing dione, cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-8- or tribal governments, on the
from the Codex level. methoxy-2-oxo-1-azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en- relationship between the national
The Codex has not established a MRL 4-yl beta-D-glucopyranoside, and cis-3- government and the States or tribal
for spirotetramat. (2,5-dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8- governments, or on the distribution of
methoxy-1-azaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one, power and responsibilities among the
C. Response to Comments calculated as the stoichiometric various levels of government or between
One comment was received from an equivalent of spirotetramat, in or on the Federal Government and Indian
anonymous source requesting that the beet, sugar, molasses at 0.30 ppm; beet, tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
Agency deny IR–4’s petition for use of sugar, roots at 0.15 ppm; carrot, roots at that Executive Order 13132, entitled
spirotetramat on all food items claiming 0.15 ppm; fruit, stone, group 12–12 at ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
it is a toxic chemical and its use would 4.5 ppm; and nut, tree, group 14–12 at 1999) and Executive Order 13175,
result in harm to humans. 0.25 ppm. In addition, EPA is revoking entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
The Agency’s Response: The Agency the existing tolerances for fruit, stone, with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
recognizes that some individuals believe group 12 and nut, tree, group 14 as they 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
that certain pesticides are ‘‘toxic are superseded by the new tolerances to this action. In addition, this action
chemicals’’ that should not be permitted for groups 12–12 and 14–12 established does not impose any enforceable duty or
in our food; however, the commenter under this final rule. contain any unfunded mandate as
provided no information demonstrating described under Title II of the Unfunded
toxicity of spirotetramat or that EPA VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
could use to evaluate the safety of the 1501 et seq.).
pesticide. The existing legal framework This action establishes tolerances This action does not involve any
provided by section 408 of the Federal under FFDCA section 408(d) in technical standards that would require
Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) response to a petition submitted to the Agency consideration of voluntary
states that tolerances may be set when Agency. The Office of Management and consensus standards pursuant to section
persons seeking such tolerances or Budget (OMB) has exempted these types 12(d) of the National Technology
exemptions have demonstrated that the of actions from review under Executive Transfer and Advancement Act
pesticide meets the safety standard Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
imposed by that statute. When new or Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
amended tolerances are requested for October 4, 1993). Because this action VII. Congressional Review Act
residues of a pesticide in food or feed, has been exempted from review under Pursuant to the Congressional Review
the Agency, as is required by Section Executive Order 12866, this action is Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
408 of the Federal Food, Drug and not subject to Executive Order 13211, submit a report containing this rule and
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), estimates the entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning other required information to the U.S.
risk of the potential exposure to these Regulations That Significantly Affect Senate, the U.S. House of
residues. The Agency has concluded Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 Representatives, and the Comptroller
after this risk assessment, which FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive General of the United States prior to
includes the consideration of long-term Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of publication of the rule in the Federal
animal studies with spirotetramat, that Children from Environmental Health Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
there is a reasonable certainty that no Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Jun 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM 14JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_27257/page/5.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 14, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 27149
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 SUMMARY: This regulation establishes • Food manufacturing (NAICS code
Environmental protection, tolerances for residues of isofetamid in 311).
Administrative practice and procedure, or on multiple commodities which are • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides identified and discussed later in this code 32532).
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping document. ISK Biosciences Corporation B. How can I get electronic access to
requirements. requested these tolerances under the other related information?
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Dated: May 8, 2017. (FFDCA). The regulation also removes You may access a frequently updated
Michael Goodis, the existing time-limited tolerances for electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
Director, Registration Division, Office of residues on ‘‘bushberry subgroup 13– regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
Pesticide Programs. 07B’’ and ‘‘caneberry subgroup 13–07A’’ the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is because they are no longer needed as a site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-
amended as follows: result of this action. idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
DATES: This regulation is effective June
40tab_02.tpl.
PART 180—[AMENDED] 14, 2017. Objections and requests for C. How can I file an objection or hearing
■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 hearings must be received on or before request?
continues to read as follows: August 14, 2017, and must be filed in Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
accordance with the instructions U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also objection to any aspect of this regulation
■ 2. In § 180.641, in the table in Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY and may also request a hearing on those
paragraph (a)(1): INFORMATION).
objections. You must file your objection
■ i. Add alphabetically the entries: The docket for this action,
ADDRESSES: or request a hearing on this regulation
‘‘Beet, sugar, molasses’’; ‘‘Beet, sugar, identified by docket identification (ID) in accordance with the instructions
roots’’; ‘‘Carrot, roots’’; ‘‘Fruit, stone, number EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0263, is provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
group 12–12’’; and ‘‘Nut, tree, group 14– available at http://www.regulations.gov proper receipt by EPA, you must
12’’; and or at the Office of Pesticide Programs identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
■ ii. Remove entries for ‘‘Fruit, stone,
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) OPP–2016–0263 in the subject line on
group 12’’ and ‘‘Nut, tree, group 14’’. in the Environmental Protection Agency the first page of your submission. All
The additions read as follows: Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William objections and requests for a hearing
§ 180.641 Spirotetramat; tolerances for Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 must be in writing, and must be
residues. Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC received by the Hearing Clerk on or
(a) * * * 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room before August 14, 2017. Addresses for
(1) * * * is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., mail and hand delivery of objections
Monday through Friday, excluding legal and hearing requests are provided in 40
Parts per holidays. The telephone number for the CFR 178.25(b).
Commodity million Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, In addition to filing an objection or
and the telephone number for the OPP hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
* * * * *
the visitor instructions and additional submit a copy of the filing (excluding
Beet, sugar, molasses ................ 0.30
Beet, sugar, roots ....................... 0.15 information about the docket available any Confidential Business Information
at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
* * * * * FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information not marked confidential
Carrot, roots ................................ 0.15 Michael L. Goodis, Registration Division pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
* * * * * Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
Fruit, stone, group 12–12 ........... 4.5 objection or hearing request, identified
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; main telephone by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
* * * * *
number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 2016–0263, by one of the following
Nut, tree, group 14–12 ............... 0.25
RDFRNotices@epa.gov. methods:
* * * * * • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
* * * * * I. General Information instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
[FR Doc. 2017–12348 Filed 6–13–17; 8:45 am] A. Does this action apply to me?
information you consider to be CBI or
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P You may be potentially affected by other information whose disclosure is
this action if you are an agricultural restricted by statute.
producer, food manufacturer, or • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION pesticide manufacturer. The following Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
AGENCY list of North American Industrial DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
40 CFR Part 180 Classification System (NAICS) codes is NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather • Hand Delivery: To make special
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0263; FRL–9961–80] provides a guide to help readers arrangements for hand delivery or
determine whether this document delivery of boxed information, please
Isofetamid; Pesticide Tolerances applies to them. Potentially affected follow the instructions at http://
AGENCY: Environmental Protection entities may include: www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Agency (EPA). • Crop production (NAICS code 111). Additional instructions on
ACTION: Final rule.
• Animal production (NAICS code commenting or visiting the docket,
112). along with more information about
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Jun 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM 14JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_27257/page/6.svg)
Document Created: 2017-06-14 01:23:45
Document Modified: 2017-06-14 01:23:45
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This regulation is effective June 14, 2017. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before August 14, 2017, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). | |
| Contact | Michael Goodis, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 27144 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Agricultural Commodities; Pesticides and Pests and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR