82 FR 27226 - Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 113 (June 14, 2017)

Page Range		27226-27227
FR Document		2017-12301

The Department of Commerce (the Department) published the Preliminary Results of the seventh administrative review of the antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) on February 8, 2017. The period of review (POR) for the administrative review is May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. The review was initiated with respect to twenty companies. After rescinding the review with respect to RZBC Co., Ltd., RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd., and RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd. (collectively, RZBC) at the Preliminary Results, seventeen companies remain under review. The Department finds that fifteen companies, including mandatory respondent Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry Co., Ltd. (Taihe), are part of the PRC-wide entity, and two companies had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. No parties commented. Our final results remain unchanged from the Preliminary Results.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 113 (Wednesday, June 14, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27226-27227]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-937]


Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People's Republic 
of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) published the 
Preliminary Results of the seventh administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts (citric 
acid) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) on February 8, 2017. 
The period of review (POR) for the administrative review is May 1, 
2015, through April 30, 2016. The review was initiated with respect to 
twenty companies. After rescinding the review with respect to RZBC Co., 
Ltd., RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd., and RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd. 
(collectively, RZBC) at the Preliminary Results, seventeen companies 
remain under review. The Department finds that fifteen companies, 
including mandatory respondent Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry Co., Ltd. 
(Taihe), are part of the PRC-wide entity, and two companies had no 
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We gave interested 
parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. No 
parties commented. Our final results remain unchanged from the 
Preliminary Results.

DATES: Effective June 14, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Krisha Hill, Office IV, Enforcement & 
Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 
1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 
482-4037.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On February 8, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary 
Results.\1\ We invited interested parties to submit comments on the 
Preliminary Results, but we received no comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People's 
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, 
and Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 9722 (February 8, 2017) 
(Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the order include the hydrous and anhydrous 
forms of citric acid, the dihydrate and anhydrous forms of sodium 
citrate, otherwise known as citric acid sodium salt, and the 
monohydrate and monopotassium forms of potassium citrate. Sodium 
citrate also includes both trisodium citrate and monosodium citrate, 
which are also known as citric acid trisodium salt and citric acid 
monosodium salt, respectively. Citric acid and sodium citrate are 
classifiable under 2918.14.0000 and 2918.15.1000 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), respectively. Potassium 
citrate and crude calcium citrate are classifiable under 2918.15.5000 
and 3824.90.9290 of the HTSUS, respectively. Blends that include citric 
acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate are classifiable under 
3824.90.9290 of the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided 
for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the 
merchandise is dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada and 
the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703 
(May 29, 2009) for a full description of the scope of the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined Niran 
(Thailand) Co., Ltd. (Niran) and Niran Biochemical Limited (Niran 
Biochemical) had no reviewable transactions during the POR.\3\ We 
received no comments concerning our finding of no shipments by Niran 
and Niran Biochemical. In these final results of review, we continue to 
find that Niran and Niran Biochemical had no shipments of subject 
merchandise during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 9722.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Separate Rates

    The Department considers fifteen companies listed in the Initiation 
Notice, including Taihe, to be part of the PRC-wide entity. Because 
Taihe did not respond to the Department's original questionnaire and 
did not provide separate rate information, Taihe has not established 
its eligibility for separate rate status. Furthermore, the remaining 
fourteen companies failed to provide separate rate applications or 
separate rate certifications necessary to establish their eligibility 
for a separate rate.\4\ Therefore, the Department determines that these 
fifteen companies, including Taihe, are not eligible for a separate 
rate and are part of the PRC-wide entity. Accordingly, the Department 
determined a rate consistent with the Department's current practice 
regarding conditional review of the PRC-wide entity.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 44260, 44265 (July 7, 2016) 
(Initiation Notice).
    \5\ See Preliminary Results and accompanying Decision Memorandum 
at 4. See also Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 
2013). Under this practice, the PRC-wide entity will not be under 
review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-
initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a 
review of the PRC-wide entity, the entity is not under review and 
the entity's rate is not subject to change.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 27227]]

Final Results of Review

    The Department determines that the following companies are part of 
the PRC-wide entity: (1) Taihe, (2) Anhui BBCA International Co., Ltd., 
(3) BCH Chemical International Limited, (4) China Chem Source (HK) Co., 
Ltd., (5) COFCO Biochemical AnHui Co., Ltd., (6) Jiangsu Guoxin Union 
Energy Co., Ltd., (7) Kaifeng Chemical Co., Ltd., (8) Qingdao Chongzhi 
International, (9) Qingdao Samin Chemical Co., Ltd., (10) Shanghai 
Fenhe International Co., Ltd., (11) Sunshine Biotech International Co., 
Ltd., (12) Tianjin Kaifeng Chemical Co., Ltd., (13) TTCA Co., Ltd., 
(14) Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd., and (15) Yixing-Union 
Biochemical Co., Ltd.

Assessment

    The Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\6\ The 
Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 
after the publication date of the final results of this review. The 
Department intends to instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject 
merchandise from the PRC-wide entity, including entries of subject 
merchandise from Taihe, at 156.87 percent (the PRC-wide rate).\7\ For 
Niran and Niran Biochemical, which the Department determined had no 
shipments during the POR, all suspended entries will be liquidated at 
the assessment rate for the PRC-wide entity.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \7\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
    \8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this AR for all shipments of the 
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of 
review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended (the Act): (1) For previously investigated or reviewed 
exporters of merchandise from the PRC which are not under review in 
this segment of the proceeding but which have separate rates, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published 
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (2) for all 
PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be 
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for 
the PRC-wide entity, 156.87 percent; and (3) for all non-PRC exporters 
of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the exporter(s) of 
merchandise from the PRC that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to the 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the 
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order 
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the 
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    We are issuing and publishing these results and this notice in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.213(d) and 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: June 8, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-12301 Filed 6-13-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

27226 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 14, 2017 / Notices

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will Preliminary Results of the seventh Potassium citrate and crude calcium
be the rate applicable to the PRC administrative review of the citrate are classifiable under
exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC antidumping duty order on citric acid 2918.15.5000 and 3824.90.9290 of the
exporter. These cash deposit and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from HTSUS, respectively. Blends that
requirements, when imposed, shall the People’s Republic of China (PRC) on include citric acid, sodium citrate, and
remain in effect until further notice. February 8, 2017. The period of review potassium citrate are classifiable under
(POR) for the administrative review is 3824.90.9290 of the HTSUS. Although
Notification to Importers
May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. the HTSUS subheadings are provided
This notice serves as a final reminder The review was initiated with respect to for convenience and customs purposes,
to importers of their responsibility twenty companies. After rescinding the the written description of the
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a review with respect to RZBC Co., Ltd., merchandise is dispositive.2
certificate regarding the reimbursement RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd., and
of antidumping and/or countervailing Final Determination of No Shipments
RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd. (collectively,
duties prior to liquidation of the RZBC) at the Preliminary Results, In the Preliminary Results, the
relevant entries during this review seventeen companies remain under Department determined Niran
period. Failure to comply with this review. The Department finds that (Thailand) Co., Ltd. (Niran) and Niran
requirement could result in the fifteen companies, including mandatory Biochemical Limited (Niran
Secretary’s presumption that respondent Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry Biochemical) had no reviewable
reimbursement of the antidumping and/ Co., Ltd. (Taihe), are part of the PRC- transactions during the POR.3 We
or countervailing duties occurred and wide entity, and two companies had no received no comments concerning our
the subsequent assessment of double shipments of subject merchandise finding of no shipments by Niran and
antidumping duties. during the POR. We gave interested Niran Biochemical. In these final results
parties an opportunity to comment on of review, we continue to find that
Administrative Protective Order
the Preliminary Results. No parties Niran and Niran Biochemical had no
This notice also serves as a reminder shipments of subject merchandise
to parties subject to administrative commented. Our final results remain
unchanged from the Preliminary during the POR.
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or Results. Separate Rates
destruction of proprietary information DATES: Effective June 14, 2017. The Department considers fifteen
disclosed under the APO in accordance FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: companies listed in the Initiation
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Krisha Hill, Office IV, Enforcement & Notice, including Taihe, to be part of the
continues to govern business Compliance, International Trade PRC-wide entity. Because Taihe did not
proprietary information in this segment Administration, Department of respond to the Department’s original
of the proceeding. Timely written Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue questionnaire and did not provide
notification of the return/destruction of NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: separate rate information, Taihe has not
APO materials or conversion to judicial (202) 482–4037. established its eligibility for separate
protective order is hereby requested. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rate status. Furthermore, the remaining
Failure to comply with the regulations fourteen companies failed to provide
and terms of an APO is a violation Background separate rate applications or separate
which is subject to sanction. On February 8, 2017, the Department rate certifications necessary to establish
We are issuing and publishing these published the Preliminary Results.1 We their eligibility for a separate rate.4
amended final results of administrative invited interested parties to submit Therefore, the Department determines
review in accordance with sections comments on the Preliminary Results, that these fifteen companies, including
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. but we received no comments. Taihe, are not eligible for a separate rate
Dated: June 7, 2017. and are part of the PRC-wide entity.
Scope of the Order Accordingly, the Department
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
The products covered by the order determined a rate consistent with the
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance. include the hydrous and anhydrous Department’s current practice regarding
forms of citric acid, the dihydrate and conditional review of the PRC-wide
[FR Doc. 2017–12303 Filed 6–13–17; 8:45 am]
anhydrous forms of sodium citrate, entity.5
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
otherwise known as citric acid sodium
2 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
salt, and the monohydrate and
Canada and the People’s Republic of China:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE monopotassium forms of potassium Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703 (May 29,
citrate. Sodium citrate also includes 2009) for a full description of the scope of the order.
International Trade Administration both trisodium citrate and monosodium 3 See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 9722.
4 See Initiation of Antidumping and
[A–570–937] citrate, which are also known as citric
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
acid trisodium salt and citric acid 44260, 44265 (July 7, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts monosodium salt, respectively. Citric 5 See Preliminary Results and accompanying

From the People’s Republic of China: acid and sodium citrate are classifiable Decision Memorandum at 4. See also Antidumping
Final Results of Antidumping Duty under 2918.14.0000 and 2918.15.1000 of Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Department Practice for Respondent Selection in
Administrative Review and Final Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

Determination of No Shipments; 2015– United States (HTSUS), respectively. Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME
2016 Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963,
1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From 65970 (November 4, 2013). Under this practice, the
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a
International Trade Administration, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, party specifically requests, or the Department self-
Department of Commerce. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party
Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty requested a review of the PRC-wide entity, the
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 9722 entity is not under review and the entity’s rate is
(the Department) published the (February 8, 2017) (Preliminary Results). not subject to change.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Jun 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 14, 2017 / Notices 27227

Final Results of Review wide entity, 156.87 percent; and (3) for SUMMARY: Under the EU-U.S. Privacy
The Department determines that the all non-PRC exporters of subject Shield Framework, the U.S. Department
following companies are part of the merchandise which have not received of Commerce (DOC) and the European
PRC-wide entity: (1) Taihe, (2) Anhui their own rate, the cash deposit rate will Commission have committed to
BBCA International Co., Ltd., (3) BCH be the rate applicable to the exporter(s) implement an arbitration mechanism to
Chemical International Limited, (4) of merchandise from the PRC that provide European individuals with the
China Chem Source (HK) Co., Ltd., (5) supplied that non-PRC exporter. These ability to invoke binding arbitration to
COFCO Biochemical AnHui Co., Ltd., deposit requirements, when imposed, determine, for residual claims, whether
(6) Jiangsu Guoxin Union Energy Co., shall remain in effect until further an organization has violated its
Ltd., (7) Kaifeng Chemical Co., Ltd., (8) notice. obligations under the Privacy Shield
Qingdao Chongzhi International, (9) Framework. The DOC and the European
Notification to Importers Regarding the Commission will work together to
Qingdao Samin Chemical Co., Ltd., (10) Reimbursement of Duties implement the arbitration mechanism,
Shanghai Fenhe International Co., Ltd.,
This notice serves as a final reminder including by jointly developing a list of
(11) Sunshine Biotech International Co.,
to importers of their responsibility at least 20 arbitrators. Parties to a
Ltd., (12) Tianjin Kaifeng Chemical Co.,
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a binding arbitration under this Privacy
Ltd., (13) TTCA Co., Ltd., (14) Weifang
certificate regarding the reimbursement Shield mechanism may only select
Ensign Industry Co., Ltd., and (15)
of antidumping duties prior to arbitrators from this list. This notice
Yixing-Union Biochemical Co., Ltd.
liquidation of the relevant entries announces the opportunity to apply for
Assessment during this POR. Failure to comply with inclusion on the list of arbitrators
The Department will determine, and this requirement could result in the developed by the DOC and the
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on Department’s presumption that European Commission.
all appropriate entries covered by this reimbursement of antidumping duties DATES: Applications should be received
review.6 The Department intends to has occurred and the subsequent by July 14, 2017.
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 assessment of doubled antidumping ADDRESSES: Please submit applications
days after the publication date of the duties. to Nasreen Djouini at the U.S.
final results of this review. The Department of Commerce, either by
Notification to Interested Parties email at Nasreen.Djouini@trade.gov, or
Department intends to instruct CBP to
liquidate entries of subject merchandise This notice also serves as a reminder by fax at: 202–482–5522. More
from the PRC-wide entity, including to parties subject to the administrative information on the arbitration
entries of subject merchandise from protective order (APO) of their mechanism may be found at https://
Taihe, at 156.87 percent (the PRC-wide responsibility concerning the www.privacyshield.gov/
rate).7 For Niran and Niran Biochemical, disposition of proprietary information article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction.
which the Department determined had disclosed under APO in accordance FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
no shipments during the POR, all with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely Nasreen Djouini, International Trade
suspended entries will be liquidated at notification of the destruction of APO Administration, 202–482–6259 or
the assessment rate for the PRC-wide materials or conversion to judicial Nasreen.Djouini@trade.gov.
entity.8 protective order is hereby requested. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EU-
Failure to comply with the regulations U.S. Privacy Shield Framework was
Cash Deposit Requirements
and the terms of an APO is a designed by the U.S. Department of
The following cash deposit sanctionable violation. Commerce (DOC) and the European
requirements will be effective upon We are issuing and publishing these Commission (Commission) to provide
publication of the final results of this results and this notice in accordance companies on both sides of the Atlantic
AR for all shipments of the subject with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the with a mechanism to comply with data
merchandise entered, or withdrawn Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d) and protection requirements when
from warehouse, for consumption on or 351.221(b)(5). transferring personal data from the
after the publication date of the final European Union to the United States in
results of review, as provided by section Dated: June 8, 2017.
support of transatlantic commerce. On
751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Ronald K. Lorentzen,
July 12, 2016, the Commission deemed
amended (the Act): (1) For previously Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
investigated or reviewed exporters of and Compliance.
(Privacy Shield) adequate to enable data
merchandise from the PRC which are [FR Doc. 2017–12301 Filed 6–13–17; 8:45 am] transfers under EU law, and on August
not under review in this segment of the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 1, 2016, the DOC began accepting self-
proceeding but which have separate certifications from U.S. companies to
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue join the program (81 FR 47752; July 22,
to be the exporter-specific rate DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 2016). For more information on the
published for the most recently Privacy Shield, visit
completed segment of this proceeding; International Trade Administration
www.privacyshield.gov.
(2) for all PRC exporters of subject EU-U.S. Privacy Shield; Invitation for As described in Annex I of the
merchandise that have not been found Applications for Inclusion on the List Privacy Shield, the DOC and the
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash Commission have committed to
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

of Arbitrators
deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC- implement an arbitration mechanism to
AGENCY:International Trade provide European individuals with the
6 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Administration, U.S. Department of ability to invoke binding arbitration to
7 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-
Commerce. determine, for residual claims, whether
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 an organization has violated its
ACTION: Notice; invitation for
(October 24, 2011). obligations under the Privacy Shield.
applications.
8 Id. Organizations voluntarily self-certify to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Jun 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1

Document Created: 2017-06-14 01:24:04
Document Modified: 2017-06-14 01:24:04

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Dates		Effective June 14, 2017.
Contact		Krisha Hill, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4037.
FR Citation		82 FR 27226

82 FR 27226 - Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEInternational Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 113 (June 14, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration