82 FR 28614 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Permits, Approvals, and Registrations

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 120 (June 23, 2017)

Page Range		28614-28616
FR Document		2017-13189
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maryland. This revision pertains to Maryland's administrative procedures for the issuance, denial, and appeal of permits issued by the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE). This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 120 (Friday, June 23, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 120 (Friday, June 23, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28614-28616]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0576; FRL-9963-72-Region 3]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Maryland; Permits, Approvals, and Registrations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the 
State of Maryland. This revision pertains to Maryland's administrative 
procedures for the issuance, denial, and appeal of permits issued by 
the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE). This action is being 
taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES:  Written comments must be received on or before July 24, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2016-0576 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to 
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow 
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either 
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its 
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and 
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will 
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person 
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full 
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia 
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please 
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Talley, (215) 814-2117, or by 
email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 22, 2016, the State of Maryland 
through the MDE formally submitted amendments to Maryland's general 
administrative provisions related to CAA permitting as a revision to 
Maryland's SIP.

I. Background

    The CAA's New Source Review (NSR) programs are preconstruction 
review and permitting programs applicable to new and modified 
stationary sources of air pollutants regulated under the CAA. The NSR 
programs of the CAA include a combination of air quality planning and 
air pollution control technology program requirements. Briefly, section 
109 of the CAA requires EPA to promulgate primary national ambient air 
quality standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and secondary NAAQS 
to protect public welfare. Once EPA sets those standards, states must 
develop, adopt, and submit to EPA for approval a SIP that contains 
emissions limitations and other control measures to attain and maintain 
the NAAQS. Pursuant to section 110, each SIP is required to contain a 
preconstruction review program for the construction and modification of 
any stationary source of air pollution to assure that the NAAQS are 
achieved and maintained; to protect areas of clean air; to protect air 
quality-related values (such as visibility) in national parks and other 
areas; to assure that appropriate emissions controls are applied; to 
maximize opportunities for economic development consistent with the 
preservation of clean air resources; and, to ensure that any decision 
to increase air pollution is made only after full public consideration 
of the consequences of the decision. Section 172 of the CAA requires a 
permit program in areas which are not attaining the NAAQS, and section 
173 provides the specific requirements for that permit program.
    MDE's February 22, 2016 SIP submittal consists of revisions to 
regulations under section 26.11.02 (Permits, Approvals, and 
Registration) of the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) which EPA has 
previously approved into the Maryland SIP. The purpose of the revisions 
is to incorporate amended state statutory requirements \1\ into the 
Maryland SIP. The revisions are related to MDE's administrative 
processes for permit issuance and denial. Specifically, the revisions 
eliminate the ``contested case'' process and the Office of 
Administrative Hearings' (OAH) adjudicatory hearing

[[Page 28615]]

process for major permits, and substitute direct judicial review. 
Additionally, the revisions expand standing for challenges to those 
major permits, and include additional public notice requirements for 
certain sources. The Maryland statutory requirements were incorporated 
into MDE's implementing regulations under COMAR 26.11.02 as described 
below, and submitted to EPA for approval into the Maryland SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See S.B. 1065, Acts of 2009; H.B. 554 and H.B. 95, Acts of 
2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis

    Maryland's SIP revision includes several amended administrative 
provisions under COMAR 26.11.02 (Permits, Approvals, and Registration). 
Specifically, 26.11.02.07 (Procedures for Denying, Revoking, or 
Reopening and Revising a Permit or Approval), 26.11.02.11 (Procedures 
for Obtaining Permits to Construct Certain Significant Sources), and 
26.11.02.12 (Procedures for Obtaining Approvals of PSD Sources and NSR 
Sources, Certain Permits to Construct, and Case-by-Case MACT 
Determinations in Accordance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart B) have been 
revised as follows.
    Under the currently approved SIP, COMAR 26.11.02.07, denials and 
approvals of permits to construct, State operating permits, and State-
only enforceable portions of title V operating permits are considered 
``final actions'' subject to judicial review if the permittee did not 
request a hearing before the OAH and MDE pursuant to the ``contested 
case process.'' In MDE's February 22, 2016 SIP submittal, MDE submitted 
for inclusion in the Maryland SIP a revised version of COMAR 
26.11.02.07 which provides for a separate process for denials of 
permits to construct. Under the revised 26.11.02.07, denials of permits 
to construct immediately constitute ``final determinations'' which are 
subject to direct judicial review (without requiring permittees to seek 
review through the OAH), pursuant to the revised procedures for major 
permits in the revised COMAR 26.11.02.11 described below.
    MDE's February 22, 2016 SIP submittal also includes a number of 
revisions MDE made to COMAR 26.11.02.11, which contains the procedures 
for processing permits to construct for ``significant'' sources. This 
section applies to modifications at sources: (a) For which a state 
operating permit is required; (b) which are subject to new source 
performance standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60, national emission 
standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAPS) at 40 CFR part 61, or 
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements at 40 CFR 
part 52.21; (c) which, after control, will discharge 25 tons per year 
or more of a pollutant regulated under Environment Article, Title 2, of 
the Annotated Code of Maryland; and (d) of lead which will discharge 5 
or more tons of elemental lead per year. See COMAR 26.11.02.11A(1,2). 
COMAR 26.11.02.11 was previously in the Maryland SIP. The revisions 
made include a minor change to the public participation processes for 
sources that trigger NSPS under 40 CFR part 60 but do not trigger NSR 
requirements, enhanced public notification provisions which require MDE 
to notify elected officials within a 1-mile radius of a source subject 
to the expanded public participation requirements of permit 
proceedings, eliminated the contested case process for significant 
permits, and instituted direct judicial review in circuit court for 
parties wishing to contest such permits. Additionally, MDE also 
included a revised version of COMAR 26.11.02.12 which included minor 
revisions, clarifying that Regulation .12 only applies to NSR and PSD 
permit approvals, case-by-case approvals pursuant to 40 CFR part 63 for 
air toxic sources, and permits to construct which are not subject to 
COMAR 26.11.02.11.
    EPA's review of MDE's February 22, 2016 SIP submittal finds it 
consistent with all applicable requirements of the CAA and its 
implementing regulations. The COMAR public notice requirements meet or 
exceed the requirements of 40 CFR 51.160 and 51.161. Additionally, the 
revisions are approvable under section 110 of the CAA (specifically 
section 110(a)(2)(A) and (C) and section 173 for NSR programs). Under 
section 110(a)(2)(C), the SIP must include a program to enforce the 
emission limits and control measures in a state's SIP (as required by 
section 110(a)(2)(A)) and must also contain a program to regulate 
modification/construction of sources so that the NAAQS are achieved. 
Section 173 requires the permits program for nonattainment NSR and 
requires states to have a SIP with a permit program that ensures 
sources are required to comply with certain things like stringent 
emission limitations (i.e., lowest achievable emission rates) and 
offsets. While having a permits program in the SIP that addresses 
denial or revocation of permits and addresses permit appeals does not 
address the required substance of a NSR program, these provisions do 
make the NSR program enforceable, and therefore EPA finds the SIP 
submission and revisions to COMAR 26.11.02 approvable under CAA 
sections 173 and 110(a)(2)(A) and (C). In addition, because none of the 
revisions to COMAR 26.11.02 will affect emissions of pollutants from 
sources and are largely administrative in nature, EPA finds that none 
of the revisions to COMAR 26.11.02 will interfere with reasonable 
further progress, any NAAQS, or any other applicable requirements in 
the CAA. Thus, EPA finds the submittal is approvable for section 110(l) 
of the CAA.

III. Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve MDE's February 22, 2016 SIP submittal 
as a revision to the Maryland SIP as the SIP submittal meets 
requirements in the CAA under sections 110 and 173. EPA is soliciting 
public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These 
comments will be considered before taking final action.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this proposed rulemaking, EPA is proposing to include in a final 
EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In 
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to 
incorporate by reference the MDE rules regarding permit issuance and 
denial as described in Section II of this preamble. EPA has made, and 
will continue to make, these materials generally available through 
https://www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region III Office (please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section of this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

[[Page 28616]]

     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this proposed rule, related to Maryland's 
administrative processes for preconstruction permitting, does not have 
tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian 
country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose 
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: June 2, 2017.
Cecil Rodrigues,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2017-13189 Filed 6-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
28614 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2017 / Proposed Rules

• Does not impose an information ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
collection burden under the provisions AGENCY February 22, 2016, the State of
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Maryland through the MDE formally
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 40 CFR Part 52 submitted amendments to Maryland’s
• Is certified as not having a [EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0576; FRL–9963–72– general administrative provisions
significant economic impact on a Region 3] related to CAA permitting as a revision
substantial number of small entities to Maryland’s SIP.
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Approval and Promulgation of Air I. Background
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Permits, Approvals, and The CAA’s New Source Review (NSR)
• Does not contain any unfunded programs are preconstruction review
mandate or significantly or uniquely Registrations
and permitting programs applicable to
affect small governments, as described AGENCY: Environmental Protection new and modified stationary sources of
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Agency (EPA). air pollutants regulated under the CAA.
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); ACTION: Proposed rule. The NSR programs of the CAA include
• Does not have Federalism a combination of air quality planning
implications as specified in Executive SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection and air pollution control technology
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a program requirements. Briefly, section
1999); state implementation plan (SIP) revision 109 of the CAA requires EPA to
• is not an economically significant submitted by the State of Maryland. promulgate primary national ambient
regulatory action based on health or This revision pertains to Maryland’s air quality standards (NAAQS) to
safety risks subject to Executive Order administrative procedures for the protect public health and secondary
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); issuance, denial, and appeal of permits NAAQS to protect public welfare. Once
issued by the Maryland Department of EPA sets those standards, states must
• Is not a significant regulatory action
the Environment (MDE). This action is develop, adopt, and submit to EPA for
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
being taken under the Clean Air Act approval a SIP that contains emissions
28355, May 22, 2001);
(CAA). limitations and other control measures
• Is not subject to requirements of to attain and maintain the NAAQS.
section 12(d) of the National DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 24, 2017. Pursuant to section 110, each SIP is
Technology Transfer and Advancement required to contain a preconstruction
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
review program for the construction and
application of those requirements would identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
modification of any stationary source of
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; OAR–2016–0576 at https://
air pollution to assure that the NAAQS
and www.regulations.gov, or via email to
are achieved and maintained; to protect
• Does not provide EPA with the miller.linda@epa.gov. For comments
areas of clean air; to protect air quality-
discretionary authority to address, as submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
related values (such as visibility) in
appropriate, disproportionate human online instructions for submitting
national parks and other areas; to assure
health or environmental effects, using comments. Once submitted, comments
that appropriate emissions controls are
practicable and legally permissible cannot be edited or removed from
applied; to maximize opportunities for
methods, under Executive Order 12898 Regulations.gov. For either manner of
economic development consistent with
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). submission, EPA may publish any
the preservation of clean air resources;
comment received to its public docket.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to and, to ensure that any decision to
Do not submit electronically any
apply on any Indian reservation land or increase air pollution is made only after
information you consider to be
in any other area where EPA or an full public consideration of the
confidential business information (CBI)
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a consequences of the decision. Section
or other information whose disclosure is
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 172 of the CAA requires a permit
restricted by statute. Multimedia
Indian country, the rule does not have program in areas which are not attaining
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
tribal implications and will not impose the NAAQS, and section 173 provides
accompanied by a written comment.
substantial direct costs on tribal the specific requirements for that permit
The written comment is considered the
governments or preempt tribal law as program.
official comment and should include MDE’s February 22, 2016 SIP
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
discussion of all points you wish to submittal consists of revisions to
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
make. EPA will generally not consider regulations under section 26.11.02
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 comments or comment contents located (Permits, Approvals, and Registration)
outside of the primary submission (i.e. of the Code of Maryland Regulations
Environmental protection, Air on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
pollution control, Carbon monoxide, (COMAR) which EPA has previously
system). For additional submission approved into the Maryland SIP. The
Incorporation by reference, methods, please contact the person
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, purpose of the revisions is to
identified in the FOR FURTHER incorporate amended state statutory
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements 1 into the Maryland SIP.
full EPA public comment policy, The revisions are related to MDE’s
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile information about CBI or multimedia
organic compounds. administrative processes for permit
submissions, and general guidance on issuance and denial. Specifically, the
Dated: June 5, 2017. making effective comments, please visit revisions eliminate the ‘‘contested case’’
Deborah A. Szaro, https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ process and the Office of Administrative
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New commenting-epa-dockets. Hearings’ (OAH) adjudicatory hearing
England. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2017–13059 Filed 6–22–17; 8:45 am] David Talley, (215) 814–2117, or by 1 See S.B. 1065, Acts of 2009; H.B. 554 and H.B.

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P email at talley.david@epa.gov. 95, Acts of 2013.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:12 Jun 22, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM 23JNP1
28616 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 120 / Friday, June 23, 2017 / Proposed Rules

• is certified as not having a ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
significant economic impact on a AGENCY Brian Storey, Sector Policies and
substantial number of small entities Programs Division (D243–04), Office of
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 40 CFR Part 63 Air Quality Planning and Standards,
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); [EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0442; FRL–9964–13– U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
• does not contain any unfunded OAR] Research Triangle Park, North Carolina,
27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
mandate or significantly or uniquely RIN 2060–AT57 1103; fax number: (919) 541–5450; and
affect small governments, as described
National Emission Standards for email address: storey.brian@epa.gov.
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Hazardous Air Pollutants From the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Portland Cement Manufacturing
• does not have federalism I. Why is the EPA issuing this proposed
Industry: Alternative Monitoring
implications as specified in Executive rule?
Method
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999); AGENCY: Environmental Protection This document proposes to take
Agency (EPA). action on amendments to the National
• is not an economically significant
ACTION: Proposed rule. Emission Standards for Hazardous
regulatory action based on health or
Pollutants From the Portland Cement
safety risks subject to Executive Order SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Manufacturing Industry. We have
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Agency (EPA) is proposing to amend the published a direct final rule to amend
• is not a significant regulatory action National Emission Standards for 40 CFR part 63, subpart LLL, by revising
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR Hazardous Air Pollutants From the the testing and monitoring requirements
28355, May 22, 2001); Portland Cement Manufacturing for HCl in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
• is not subject to requirements of Industry. In the ‘‘Rules and section of this issue of the Federal
Section 12(d) of the National Regulations’’ section of this issue of the Register because we view this as a
Technology Transfer and Advancement Federal Register, we are publishing a noncontroversial action and anticipate
direct final rule, without a prior no adverse comment. We have
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
proposed rule, that temporarily revises explained our reasons for this action in
application of those requirements would
the testing and monitoring requirements the preamble to the direct final rule.
be inconsistent with the CAA; and for hydrochloric acid (HCl) due to the If we receive no adverse comment, we
• does not provide EPA with the current unavailability of HCl calibration will not take further action on this
discretionary authority to address, as gases used for quality assurance proposed rule. If we receive adverse
appropriate, disproportionate human purposes. If we receive no adverse comment on a distinct portion of the
health or environmental effects, using comment, we will not take further direct final rule, we will withdraw that
practicable and legally permissible action on this proposed rule. portion of the rule and it will not take
methods, under Executive Order 12898 DATES: Written comments must be effect. In this instance, we would
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). received by July 3, 2017. address all public comments in any
In addition, this proposed rule, ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, subsequent final rule based on this
related to Maryland’s administrative identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– proposed rule.
processes for preconstruction OAR–2016–0442, at http:// If we receive adverse comment on a
permitting, does not have tribal www.regulations.gov. Follow the online distinct provision of the direct final
implications as specified by Executive instructions for submitting comments. rule, we will publish a timely
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, Once submitted, comments cannot be withdrawal in the Federal Register
2000), because the SIP is not approved edited or removed from Regulations.gov. indicating which provisions we are
to apply in Indian country located in the The EPA may publish any comment withdrawing. The provisions that are
received to its public docket. Do not not withdrawn will become effective on
state, and EPA notes that it will not
submit electronically any information the date set out in the direct final rule,
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
you consider to be Confidential notwithstanding adverse comment on
governments or preempt tribal law.
Business Information (CBI) or other any other provision. We do not intend
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 information whose disclosure is to institute a second comment period on
restricted by statute. Multimedia this action. Any parties interested in
Environmental protection, Air submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be commenting must do so at this time.
pollution control, Carbon monoxide, accompanied by a written comment.
Incorporation by reference, The written comment is considered the The regulatory text for this proposal is
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, official comment and should include identical to that for the direct final rule
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate discussion of all points you wish to published in the ‘‘Rules and
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping make. The EPA will generally not Regulations’’ section of this issue of the
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile consider comments or comment Federal Register. For further
contents located outside of the primary supplementary information, the detailed
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS

organic compounds.
submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or rationale for this proposal and the
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. regulatory revisions, see the direct final
other file sharing system). For
Dated: June 2, 2017. additional submission methods, the full rule published in the ‘‘Rules and
Cecil Rodrigues, EPA public comment policy, Regulations’’ section of this issue of the
information about CBI or multimedia Federal Register.
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2017–13189 Filed 6–22–17; 8:45 am] submissions, and general guidance on II. Does this action apply to me?
making effective comments, please visit
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ Categories and entities potentially
commenting-epa-dockets. regulated by this proposed rule include:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:12 Jun 22, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM 23JNP1
Document Created: 2017-06-23 03:37:17
Document Modified: 2017-06-23 03:37:17
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Proposed rule.
Dates		Written comments must be received on or before July 24, 2017.
Contact		David Talley, (215) 814-2117, or by email at [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 28614
CFR Associated		Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds