82 FR 28824 - Dioctyl Terephthalate From the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 121 (June 26, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 121 (June 26, 2017)
| Page Range | 28824-28826 | |
| FR Document | 2017-13285 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 121 (Monday, June 26, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 28824-28826] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-13285] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-889] Dioctyl Terephthalate From the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) determines that dioctyl terephthalate (DOTP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. For information on the estimated weighted- average dumping margins of sales at LTFV, see the ``Final Determination'' section of this notice. DATES: Effective June 26, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel LaCivita or Shanah Lee, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4243 or (202) 482-6386, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On February 3, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary Determination of sales at LTFV of DOTP from Korea.\1\ The petitioner in this investigation is Eastman Chemical Company. The mandatory respondents in this investigation are Aekyung Petrochemical Co., Ltd. (AKP) and LG Chem Ltd. (LG Chem). Both AKP and LG Chem participated in this investigation. A complete summary of the events that occurred since publication of the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full [[Page 28825]] discussion of the issues raised by parties for this final determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Dioctyl Terephthalate from the Republic of Korea: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Negative Preliminary Determination of Critical Circumstances, and Postponement of Final Determination, 82 FR 9195 (February 3, 2017) (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in the Less- Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Dioctyl Terephthalate from the Republic of Korea'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). \2\ See the Department's memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Dioctyl Terephthalate From the Republic of Korea,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is available electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Access is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B-8024 of the Department's main building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and electronic version are identical in content. Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is DOTP from Korea. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case briefs and rebuttal briefs submitted by interested parties in this proceeding are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised by parties and responded to by the Department in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached at Appendix II. Verification As provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department verified the sales and cost data reported by AKP and LG Chem for use in our final determination. We used standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant accounting and production records, and original source documents provided by the respondents. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at verification, we made certain changes to the margin calculations for AKP and LG Chem since the Preliminary Determination. These changes are discussed in the ``Margin Calculations'' section of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances On November 15, 2016, the petitioner timely filed a critical circumstances allegation, pursuant to section 733(e)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.206(c)(1), alleging that critical circumstances exist with respect to imports of DOTP from Korea.\3\ We find that critical circumstances do not exist with respect to AKP and LG Chem.\4\ For a complete discussion of this issue, see the ``Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances'' section of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See letter from Petitioner, ``Re: Dioctyl Terephthalate (``DOTP'') From Korea; Critical Circumstances Allegation,'' dated November 15, 2016 (Critical Circumstances Allegation). \4\ See Preliminary Determination, 82 FR at 9195. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All-Others Rate In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, the Department calculated a dumping margin for the individually investigated exporters/producers of the subject merchandise. Consistent with sections 735(c)(1)(B)(i)(II) and 735(c)(5) of the Act, the Department also calculated an estimated ``all-others'' rate for exporters and producers not individually investigated. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the ``all-others'' rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted- average dumping margins established for individually investigated exporters and producers, excluding any margins that are zero or de minimis or any margins determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. We calculated the all-others rate using a weighted average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents using each company's publicly-ranged values for the merchandise under consideration, pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, as referenced in the ``Final Determination'' section below.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See memorandum to the file, ``Dioctyl Terephthalate From the Republic of Korea: Calculation of All-Others' Rate in the Final Determination,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination The Department determines that the weighted-average dumping margins to be: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/producer margins (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Aekyung Petrochemical Co., Ltd............................. 4.08 LG Chem, Ltd............................................... 2.71 All-Others................................................. 3.69 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b), we intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days of any public announcement of this notice. Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue the suspension of liquidation of all appropriate entries of DOTP from Korea, as described in Appendix I of this notice, which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after February 3, 2017, the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination of this investigation in the Federal Register. Further, the Department will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the estimated amount by which the normal value exceeds the U.S. price as shown above. International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we will notify the International Trade Commission (ITC) of the final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV. Because the final determination in this proceeding is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports, or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation of DOTP from Korea no later than 45 days after our final determination. If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of material injury does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all cash deposits will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, the Department will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by the Department, antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation. [[Page 28826]] Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders (APO) This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. This determination and this notice are issued and published pursuant to sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 20, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is dioctyl terephthalate (DOTP), regardless of form. DOTP that has been blended with other products is included within this scope when such blends include constituent parts that have not been chemically reacted with each other to produce a different product. For such blends, only the DOTP component of the mixture is covered by the scope of this investigation. DOTP that is otherwise subject to this investigation is not excluded when commingled with DOTP from sources not subject to this investigation. Commingled refers to the mixing of subject and non- subject DOTP. Only the subject component of such commingled products is covered by the scope of the investigation. DOTP has the general chemical formulation C6 H4 (C8 H17 COO)2 and a chemical name of ``bis (2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate'' and has a Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) registry number of 6422-86-2. Regardless of the label, all DOTP is covered by this investigation. Subject merchandise is currently classified under subheading 2917.39.2000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Subject merchandise may also enter under subheadings 2917.39.7000 or 3812.20.1000 of the HTSUS. While the CAS registry number and HTSUS classification are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Investigation IV. Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances V. Margin Calculations VI. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether the Department's Quarterly Cost Methodology Justifies Comparing Sales on a Quarterly Basis Comment 2: Whether AKP's Reporting Supports the Department's Decision To Rely on Quarterly Costs for the Final Determination Comment 3: Whether To Adjust the Reported Cost of Purchases of Raw Material 2-Ethyl Hexanol (2-EH) Comment 4: The Structure of AKP's Paper Transactions and the Basis for U.S. Price for AKP's Channel 3 and 4 Sales Comment 5: AKP's Affiliate's Financial Statements and Indirect Selling Expenses Calculation Comment 6: Duty Drawback for AKP's U.S. Sales Comment 7: LG Chem's Duty Drawback Adjustment Comment 8: LG Chem's Constructed Export Price (CEP) Offset Comment 9: Reported Currency for LG Chem's Bank Charges Comment 10: LG Chem's General and Administrative Expense (G&A) Ratio Comment 11: LG Chem's Raw Material and Variable Overhead Costs VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-13285 Filed 6-23-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![28824 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 121 / Monday, June 26, 2017 / Notices
Decision Memorandum is provided at SXT, the cash deposit rate will continue V. Recommendation
the Appendix to this notice. to be the all-others rate (i.e., 76.46 [FR Doc. 2017–13287 Filed 6–23–17; 8:45 am]
percent); (2) for subject merchandise
Final Rescission of New Shipper BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
exported by SXT but not manufactured
Review
by SXT, the cash deposit rate will
In the Preliminary Rescission, the continue to be the all-others rate (i.e., DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Department announced its preliminary 76.46 percent); and (3) for subject
intent to rescind this review because merchandise manufactured by SXT but International Trade Administration
SXT’s request for an NSR included an exported by any other party, the cash
inaccurately certified statement that [A–580–889]
deposit rate will be the rate applicable
SXT is not affiliated with any PRC to the exporter. These cash deposit Dioctyl Terephthalate From the
exporter or producer that exported requirements, when imposed, shall Republic of Korea: Final Determination
subject merchandise (i.e., passenger remain in effect until further notice. of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
tires from the PRC) to the United States
Notification to Importers Final Negative Determination of Critical
during the period of time examined in
Circumstances
the original AD investigation (i.e.,
October 1, 2013, through March 31, This notice serves as a final reminder
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
2014) and, as such, SXT had not to importers of their responsibility
International Trade Administration,
satisfied the statutory and regulatory under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
Department of Commerce.
requirements to request an NSR.6 Based certificate regarding the reimbursement SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
on the Department’s complete analysis of antidumping duties prior to (the Department) determines that
of all information and comments on the liquidation of the relevant entries dioctyl terephthalate (DOTP) from the
record of this review, we make no during this POR. Failure to comply with Republic of Korea (Korea) is being, or is
changes to our findings in the this requirement could result in the likely to be, sold in the United States at
Preliminary Rescission. Accordingly, for Department’s presumption that less than fair value (LTFV). The period
the reasons discussed in the Preliminary reimbursement of antidumping duties of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2015,
Rescission and the Issues and Decision occurred and the subsequent assessment through March 31, 2016. For
Memorandum, we have determined to of double antidumping duties. information on the estimated weighted-
rescind this NSR with respect to SXT.7 Administrative Protective Orders average dumping margins of sales at
Assessment LTFV, see the ‘‘Final Determination’’
This notice serves as a reminder to section of this notice.
Because the Department is rescinding parties subject to administrative DATES: Effective June 26, 2017.
this NSR, we have not calculated a protective order (APO) of their
company-specific dumping margin for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
responsibility concerning the return or
SXT. SXT’s entries during the POR will Laurel LaCivita or Shanah Lee, AD/CVD
destruction of proprietary information
be assessed at the cash deposit rate Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
disclosed under APO in accordance
required at the time of entry, which is Compliance, International Trade
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
the ‘‘PRC-wide’’ rate (i.e., 76.46 Administration, U.S. Department of
to govern business proprietary
percent). Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
information in this segment of the
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
Cash Deposit Requirements proceeding. Timely written notification
(202) 482–4243 or (202) 482–6386,
of the return/destruction of APO
Effective upon publication of this respectively.
materials or conversion to judicial
notice of the final rescission of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
protective order is hereby requested.
NSR, the Department will instruct U.S.
Failure to comply with the regulations Background
Customs and Border Protection to
and terms of an APO is a violation
require a cash deposit for entries of On February 3, 2017, the Department
which is subject to sanction.
subject merchandise from SXT. The published the Preliminary
following cash deposit requirements This Department is issuing and Determination of sales at LTFV of DOTP
will be effective upon publication of publishing these results in accordance from Korea.1 The petitioner in this
this rescission for all shipments of with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 771(i)(1) investigation is Eastman Chemical
subject merchandise from SXT entered, of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and 19 Company. The mandatory respondents
or withdrawn from warehouse, for CFR 351.221(b)(5). in this investigation are Aekyung
consumption on or after the publication Dated: June 20, 2017. Petrochemical Co., Ltd. (AKP) and LG
date, as provided for by section Ronald K. Lorentzen, Chem Ltd. (LG Chem). Both AKP and
751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as LG Chem participated in this
amended (the Act): (1) For subject Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance. investigation. A complete summary of
merchandise produced and exported by the events that occurred since
Appendix publication of the Preliminary
6 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5–8;
see also Letter from SXT, ‘‘Certain Passenger List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Determination, as well as a full
Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People’s Decision Memorandum
Republic of China: New Shipper Review Request,’’ 1 See Dioctyl Terephthalate from the Republic of
February 25, 2016, at Exhibit 2 (certifying that
I. Summary Korea: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
‘‘since the investigation was initiated, {SXT} has II. Background Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Negative Preliminary
never been affiliated with any exporter or producer III. Scope of the Order Determination of Critical Circumstances, and
who exported the subject merchandise to the IV. Discussion of the Issues Postponement of Final Determination, 82 FR 9195
United States during the period of investigation Issue 1: Acceptance of Unverified (February 3, 2017) (Preliminary Determination) and
including those not individually examined during accompanying memorandum, ‘‘Decision
the investigation’’).
Submissions as ‘‘Complete and
Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in
7 See Preliminary Rescission, 82 FR at 8824; see Accurate’’ the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Dioctyl
also Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–8; Issue 2: Evidence of Xingyuan Group’s Terephthalate from the Republic of Korea’’
Issues and Decision Memorandum. Exports During the POI (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:04 Jun 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM 26JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_28945/page/1.svg)
![28826 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 121 / Monday, June 26, 2017 / Notices
Notification Regarding Administrative Comment 1: Whether the Department’s Certificate from State and Federal
Protective Orders (APO) Quarterly Cost Methodology Justifies government antitrust actions and from
Comparing Sales on a Quarterly Basis private treble damage antitrust actions
This notice serves as the only Comment 2: Whether AKP’s Reporting for the export conduct specified in the
reminder to parties subject to an APO of Supports the Department’s Decision To
Rely on Quarterly Costs for the Final
Certificate and carried out in
their responsibility concerning the compliance with its terms and
disposition of proprietary information Determination
Comment 3: Whether To Adjust the conditions. The regulations
disclosed under APO in accordance implementing Title III are found at 15
Reported Cost of Purchases of Raw
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely Material 2-Ethyl Hexanol (2–EH) CFR part 325 (2015). OTEA is issuing
notification of the return or destruction Comment 4: The Structure of AKP’s Paper this notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b),
of APO materials or conversion to Transactions and the Basis for U.S. Price which requires the Secretary of
judicial protective order is hereby for AKP’s Channel 3 and 4 Sales Commerce to publish a summary of the
requested. Failure to comply with the Comment 5: AKP’s Affiliate’s Financial certification in the Federal Register.
regulations and the terms of an APO is Statements and Indirect Selling Expenses
Calculation
Under Section 305(a) of the Act and 15
a violation subject to sanction. CFR 325.11(a), any person aggrieved by
Comment 6: Duty Drawback for AKP’s U.S.
This determination and this notice are Sales the Secretary’s determination may,
issued and published pursuant to Comment 7: LG Chem’s Duty Drawback within 30 days of the date of this notice,
sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Adjustment bring an action in any appropriate
Dated: June 20, 2017. Comment 8: LG Chem’s Constructed Export district court of the United States to set
Price (CEP) Offset aside the determination on the ground
Gary Taverman,
Comment 9: Reported Currency for LG that the determination is erroneous.
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Chem’s Bank Charges
and Countervailing Duty Operations. Comment 10: LG Chem’s General and Description of Certified Conduct
Appendix I Administrative Expense (G&A) Ratio
CAEA’s Export Trade Certificate of
Comment 11: LG Chem’s Raw Material and
Scope of the Investigation Variable Overhead Costs Review has been amended to:
The merchandise covered by this VII. Recommendation • Remove California Gold Almonds,
investigation is dioctyl terephthalate (DOTP), [FR Doc. 2017–13285 Filed 6–23–17; 8:45 am]
LLC as a Member
regardless of form. DOTP that has been • Change the name of Member
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
blended with other products is included Paramount Farms, Inc. to Wonderful
within this scope when such blends include Pistachios & Almonds, LLC
constituent parts that have not been CAEA’s Export Trade Certificate of
chemically reacted with each other to DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Review Membership, as amended, is
produce a different product. For such blends,
only the DOTP component of the mixture is International Trade Administration listed below:
covered by the scope of this investigation. [Application No. 99–11A05] Almonds California Pride, Inc.,
DOTP that is otherwise subject to this Caruthers, CA
investigation is not excluded when Export Trade Certificate of Review Baldwin-Minkler Farms, Orland, CA
commingled with DOTP from sources not Blue Diamond Growers, Sacramento, CA
subject to this investigation. Commingled ACTION:Notice of Issuance of an Campos Brothers, Caruthers, CA
refers to the mixing of subject and non- Amended Export Trade Certificate of Chico Nut Company, Chico, CA
subject DOTP. Only the subject component of Review to California Almond Export Del Rio Nut Company, Livingston, CA
such commingled products is covered by the Fair Trade Corner, Inc., Chico, CA
Association, LLC (CAEA), Application
scope of the investigation. Fisher Nut Company, Modesto, CA
DOTP has the general chemical No. 99–11A05.
Hilltop Ranch, Inc., Ballico, CA
formulation C6H4(C8H17COO)2 and a
SUMMARY: The Secretary of Commerce, Hughson Nut, Inc., Hughson, CA
chemical name of ‘‘bis (2-ethylhexyl)
terephthalate’’ and has a Chemical Abstract through the Office of Trade and Mariani Nut Company, Winters, CA
Service (CAS) registry number of 6422–86–2. Economic Analysis (OTEA), issued an Nutco, LLC d.b.a. Spycher Brothers,
Regardless of the label, all DOTP is covered amended Export Trade Certificate of Turlock, CA
by this investigation. Review to CAEA on June 12, 2017. A P–R Farms, Inc., Clovis, CA
Subject merchandise is currently classified previous amended Export Trade Roche Brothers International Family
under subheading 2917.39.2000 of the Certificate of Review was issued to Nut Co., Escalon, CA
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United CAEA on November 24, 2015, and a RPAC, LLC, Los Banos, CA
States (HTSUS). Subject merchandise may notice of its issuance was published in South Valley Almond Company, LLC,
also enter under subheadings 2917.39.7000 Wasco, CA
the Federal Register on December 10,
or 3812.20.1000 of the HTSUS. While the SunnyGem, LLC, Wasco, CA
CAS registry number and HTSUS 2015 (80 FR 76663).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Western Nut Company, Chico, CA
classification are provided for convenience
Wonderful Pistachios & Almonds, LLC,
and customs purposes, the written Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of Trade
description of the scope of this investigation Los Angeles, CA
and Economic Analysis, International
is dispositive. Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131 The effective date of the amended
(this is not a toll-free number) or email certificate is March 13, 2017, the date on
Appendix II which CAEA’s application to amend
at etca@trade.gov.
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and was deemed submitted.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Decision Memorandum
the Export Trading Company Act of Dated: June 21, 2017.
I. Summary 1982 (15 U.S.C. Sections 4001–21) (the Joseph E. Flynn,
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
Act) authorizes the Secretary of Director, Office of Trade and Economic
Commerce to issue Export Trade Analysis, International Trade Administration,
IV. Final Negative Determination of Critical
Certificates of Review. An Export Trade U.S. Department of Commerce.
Circumstances
V. Margin Calculations Certificate of Review protects the holder [FR Doc. 2017–13262 Filed 6–23–17; 8:45 am]
VI. Discussion of the Issues and the members identified in the BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:04 Jun 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM 26JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_28945/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:11:13
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:11:13
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective June 26, 2017. | |
| Contact | Laurel LaCivita or Shanah Lee, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4243 or (202) 482-6386, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 28824 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR