82 FR 29065 - Supplemental Notice of Technical Conference
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 122 (June 27, 2017)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 122 (June 27, 2017)
| Page Range | 29065-29068 | |
| FR Document | 2017-13391 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 27, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 29065-29068] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-13391] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket Nos. AD17-12-000; PL03-3-000; AD03-7-000; ER17-795-000; ER17- 795-001; RP16-1299-000; RP16-1299-001; RP16-1299-002; ER17-386-001; ER17-386-002] Supplemental Notice of Technical Conference ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Docket Nos. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developments in Natural Gas Index AD17-12-000 Liquidity and Transparency. Price Discovery in Natural Gas and PL03-3-000 Electric Markets. Natural Gas Price Formation............ AD03-7-000 ISO New England Inc.................... ER17-795-000 ER17-795-001 [[Page 29066]] Kinetica Energy Express, LLC........... RP16-1299-000 RP16-1299-001 RP16-1299-002 New York Independent System Operator, ER17-386-001 Inc. ER17-386-002 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Supplemental Notice of Technical Conference As announced in the Notices issued May 10, 2017,\1\ and June 13, 2017,\2\ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) staff will hold a technical conference on Thursday, June 29, 2017 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. to discuss the state of liquidity and transparency in the physical natural gas markets. A revised agenda and list of panel participants for this conference are attached. The conference is free of charge and open to the public. Commission members may participate in the conference. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Developments in Natural Gas Index Liquidity and Transparency, Docket No. AD17-12-000 (May 10, 2017) (Notice of Technical Conference) (https://elibrary.ferc.gov/IDMWS/common/opennat.asp?fileID=14586688). \2\ Developments in Natural Gas Index Liquidity and Transparency, Docket No. AD17-12-000 (June 13, 2017) (Supplemental Notice of Technical Conference) (https://elibrary.ferc.gov/IDMWS/common/opennat.asp?fileID=14613488). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This Supplemental Notice contains the following changes to the previously-issued technical conference agenda: (1) Edward Fortunato, Managing Director of Analytics for Constellation Energy, Exelon Corporation is not participating as a panelist on Panels 1 and 2 of the technical conference and; (2) Gregg Bradley, Supervisor of Market Compliance for the Internal Market Monitor, ISO New England Inc. will be a panelist on Panel 2 of the technical conference. Christopher Hamlen, Regulatory Counsel, ISO-NE, is not participating as a panelist. In addition, please take note that the Commission will accept post technical conference comments up to 30 days after the technical conference. Please file any comments with the Commission by July 31, 2017. If they have not already done so, those who plan to attend the technical conference are strongly encouraged to complete the registration form located at: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/06-29-17-form.asp. The dress code for the conference will be business casual. The technical conference will be transcribed. Transcripts will be available from Ace Reporting Company and may be purchased online at www.acefederal.com, or by phone at (202) 347-3700. In addition, there will be a free webcast of the conference. The webcast will allow persons to listen, but not participate, and will be accessible at www.ferc.gov Calendar of Events. The Capitol Connection provides technical support for the webcast and offers the option of listening to the technical conference via phone-bridge for a fee; visit www.CapitolConnection.org or call (703) 993-3100 with any webcast questions. Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please send an email to [email protected] or call toll free 1-866-208- 3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations. For more information about the technical conference, please contact: Sarah McKinley (Logistics), Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-8368, [email protected]. Eric Primosch (Technical), Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-6483, [email protected]. Omar Bustami (Legal), Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-6214, [email protected]. Dated: June 21, 2017. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27JN17.000 Docket No. AD17-12-000 June 29, 2017 Agenda The purpose of the staff-led Technical Conference on Developments in Natural Gas Index Liquidity and Transparency is to solicit feedback and develop a record regarding index robustness and to discuss what, if anything, the industry and/or the Commission could do to increase transparency and support greater robustness in natural gas price formation. The technical conference will examine: (1) The current state of natural gas index liquidity and voluntary reporting to index developers; (2) the use of natural gas indices over time; and (3) possible actions that the industry and/or the Commission could take to increase transparency and support greater robustness in natural gas price formation. 9:00 a.m.-9:15 a.m. Welcome and Opening Remarks 9:15 a.m.-9:45 a.m. Natural Gas Index Presentation (Commission Staff) Staff will present an overview of natural gas transactions using FERC Form No. 552 data. The presentation will review trends in next-day and next-month transactions, the number of companies that report to index developers, and the volume of fixed-priced transactions that contribute to natural gas indices. Staff will also present an overview of natural gas indices referenced in jurisdictional tariffs. [[Page 29067]] 9:45 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Panel 1: Robustness and Liquidity of Natural Gas Indices Most price indices are supplied as a commercial service by publishers of daily, weekly, or monthly newsletters. Price indices play a pivotal role in natural gas market price formation, and are commonly referenced in physical and financial transactions. This panel will examine the robustness and liquidity of natural gas indices, the degree of industry reliance on index-based contracts rather than fixed-price contracts, the decline in fixed-price reporting to index developers, and whether natural gas indices accurately reflect market conditions. Panelists are encouraged to respond to the following: 1. Describe the current trends in natural gas fixed-price and physical basis trading that you believe positively or negatively impact price formation in the natural gas market, detailing any observable shifts in liquidity. Are there differences in market fundamentals, procedures, or policies which disproportionately impact either overall or regional liquidity? 2. How have the volume and quality of next-day and next-month fixed-price and physical basis transaction reporting changed? In addition, describe any changes in other information used to form natural gas indices. Are there market, regulatory, or other factors that discourage reporting? If so, are there ways to incent reporting? 3. For indices published by index developers and referenced in FERC jurisdictional tariffs, the Commission requires index developers to comply with five standards: (1) Code of conduct and confidentiality; (2) completeness; (3) data verification, error correction, and monitoring; (4) verifiability; and (5) availability and accessibility.\3\ How have index developers' methodologies and practices changed since these standards were developed? Are the standards established in 2003 still relevant and sufficient to allow for healthy and robust natural gas price formation in today's environment? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ Policy Statement on Natural Gas and Electric Price Indices, 104 FERC ] 61,121, at P 33 (2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. Is there a need for additional transparency regarding natural gas index price assessments and the level of liquidity underlying each natural gas index published by index developers? Should common minimum liquidity thresholds be defined? If so, who should define them, and what should be the mechanism for accomplishing this? For example, should index developers provide information about which indices are illiquid? What kind of coordination would be necessary, and what kind of information would be shared, and with whom, when a given natural gas price index is deemed illiquid? PanelistsMark Callahan, Editorial Director of Platts North America, S&P Global J.C. Kneale, Vice President of North American Natural Gas, Power & NGL Markets, InterContinental Exchange Euan Craik, Chief Executive Officer, Argus Media Tom Haywood, Editor of Natural Gas Week, Energy Intelligence Dexter Steis, Executive Publisher, Natural Gas Intelligence Vince Kaminski, Professor in Practice of Energy, Rice University Orlando Alvarez, President and CEO, BP Energy Company 12:00 p.m.-1:00 p.m. Break 1:00 p.m.-3:30 p.m. Panel 2: Role of Natural Gas Indices in Price Formation Natural gas indices are used by industry for a variety of purposes, such as settling bilateral contracts of varying terms, basis swap futures, index swap futures, swing swap futures, and calendar and basis spreads. Natural gas indices also are used in FERC jurisdictional interstate natural gas pipeline and wholesale electric transmission tariffs for various purposes. For example, indices are used in many interstate natural gas pipeline tariffs to settle imbalances or determine penalties. In addition, State Commissions use indices as benchmarks in reviewing the prudence of natural gas purchases by local distribution companies. Finally, some Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators (RTOs/ISOs) rely on natural gas indices to develop reference levels for market power mitigation. Given the prevalence of indices in the natural gas and electric industries, indices must be robust and have the confidence of market participants for such markets to function properly and efficiently. Panelists are encouraged to respond to the following: 1. Describe current industry uses of physical natural gas price indices. Are natural gas price indices sufficiently reflecting the locational value of natural gas to permit decision-making by those with an interest in the value of natural gas such as: End users, producers, marketers, and other buyers and sellers? 2. Are there improvements that should be made to increase the likelihood that natural gas indices will reflect the market value at particular locations? For example, could index publishers provide increased transparency when there are insufficient transactions to formulate an index price? What additional information could signal that market activity is sufficiently robust to create accurate prices? 3. For RTOs/ISOs that rely on natural gas indices to develop reference levels for market power mitigation, do you have concerns about the robustness or liquidity of the natural gas indices used in your tariffs? If so, please explain why. 4. Recognizing that the use of natural gas indices in FERC jurisdictional tariffs is different from their use in commercial transactions, the Commission established liquidity thresholds for indices referenced in jurisdictional tariffs.\4\ Do these thresholds accurately capture minimum liquidity thresholds over an appropriate time period? Should the liquidity of indices referenced in FERC jurisdictional tariffs be reassessed periodically, and if so, who should assess it, and what should be the mechanism for accomplishing this? What kind of coordination would be necessary, and what kind of information should be shared and with whom, should a given index be deemed illiquid? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Price Discovery in Natural Gas and Electric Markets, 109 FERC ] 61,184 at P60 (2004). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Panelists: Paul Greenwood, Vice President of the Americas, Africa, and Asia Pacific New Markets for ExxonMobil, Natural Gas Supply Association Representative Pallas LeeVanSchaik, External Market Monitor, Potomac Economics Guillermo Bautista Alderete, Director of Market Analysis and Forecasting, California ISO Gregg Bradley, Supervisor of Market Compliance for the Internal Market Monitor, ISO New England Inc. George Wayne, Director of Account Services for the Western Pipelines, Kinder Morgan Corey Grindal, Senior Vice President of Gas Supply, Cheniere Energy David Louw, Division Director of Risk Management and Compliance, Macquarie Energy Donnie Sharp, Senior Natural Gas Supply Coordinator for Huntsville Utilities, American Public Gas Association Representative Lee Bennett, Manager, Pricing and Business Analysis for Transcanada, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America Representative Susan Bergles, Assistant General Counsel, American Gas Association [[Page 29068]] 3:30 p.m.-3:45 p.m. Break 3:45 p.m.-5:25 p.m. Panel 3: Options To Increase Transparency and Liquidity of Natural Gas Indices Should action be taken to foster more meaningful, reliable, and transparent price information in natural gas markets? What changes may be necessary to incent voluntary price reporting and improve the accuracy, reliability, and transparency of natural gas price indices? Discuss the degree to which the level of voluntary reporting and other developments within the commercial service model of natural gas index development impact the robustness of natural gas indices. Panelists are encouraged to respond to the following: 1. Is there a need to develop industry wide liquidity thresholds? While the Commission maintains certain liquidity thresholds for indices referenced in jurisdictional tariffs, should standards be developed that would apply to other uses of natural gas indices? If so, how can such standards be developed and by whom? Can this be addressed through voluntary consensus or through other regulatory processes? Are there legal, commercial, or technical impediments to doing so? 2. Should the Commission take steps to provide greater natural gas price transparency and market information, promote index developer competition, and enhance confidence in natural gas price formation through increased transparency and accessibility of natural gas index information? For example, should the Commission consider exercising its authority under section 23(a)(1) through (3) of the Natural Gas Act to require market participants to report price forming transactions to index developers? 3. Is index data sufficiently available and transparent? Does the commercial service model negatively or positively impact price formation? What actions, policies, or trends have impacted price discovery? Is there additional information market participants need to ensure robust natural gas price formation? Who should provide that information? How would that information be shared? Panelists: Greg Leonard, Vice President, Cornerstone Research Orlando Alvarez, President and CEO, BP Energy Company Mark Callahan, Editorial Director for Platts North America, S&P Global J.C. Kneale, Vice President of North American Natural Gas, Power & NGL Markets, InterContinental Exchange Vince Kaminski, Professor in Practice of Energy, Rice University Curtis Moffatt, Deputy General Counsel and Vice President, Kinder Morgan Joe Bowring, President, Monitoring Analytics Corey Grindal, Senior Vice President of Gas Supply, Cheniere Energy Tom Haywood, Editor of Natural Gas Week, Energy Intelligence Drew Fossum, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Tenaska Inc. Joan Dreskin, Vice President and General Counsel, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America 5:25 p.m.-5:30 p.m. Closing Remarks [FR Doc. 2017-13391 Filed 6-26-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 27, 2017 / Notices 29065
blanket authorization, under 18 CFR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Applicants: New York Independent
part 34, of future issuances of securities System Operator, Inc.
and assumptions of liability. Federal Energy Regulatory Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: 205
Commission filing of Rate Schedule 1 revisions for
Any person desiring to intervene or to
Ramapo PARs cost recovery to be
protest should file with the Federal Combined Notice of Filings #2 effective 7/1/2017.
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 Filed Date: 6/21/17.
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, Take notice that the Commission
Accession Number: 20170621–5124.
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 received the following electric corporate Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice filings:
Docket Numbers: ER17–1880–000.
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and Docket Numbers: EC17–132–000. Applicants: Midcontinent
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to Applicants: FPL Energy Wyman IV Independent System Operator, Inc.
intervene or protest must serve a copy LLC, Public Service Company of New Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
of that document on the Applicant. Hampshire. 2017–06–21_SA 900 Termination of
Description: Application for Entergy—Southcoast Wind LGIA to be
Notice is hereby given that the Authorization for Disposition of effective 9/4/2017.
deadline for filing protests with regard Jurisdictional Facilities Under Section Filed Date: 6/21/17.
to the applicant’s request for blanket 203 of the Federal Power Act and Accession Number: 20170621–5147.
authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of Request for Expedited Action of FPL Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.
future issuances of securities and Energy Wyman IV LLC, et. al. The filings are accessible in the
assumptions of liability, is July 11, Filed Date: 6/21/17. Commission’s eLibrary system by
2017. Accession Number: 20170621–5146. clicking on the links or querying the
The Commission encourages Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17. docket number.
electronic submission of protests and Take notice that the Commission Any person desiring to intervene or
interventions in lieu of paper, using the received the following exempt protest in any of the above proceedings
FERC Online links at http:// wholesale generator filings: must file in accordance with Rules 211
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic Docket Numbers: EG17–119–000. and 214 of the Commission’s
service, persons with Internet access Applicants: Buckthorn Wind, LLC. Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
Description: Notice of Self- 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
who will eFile a document and/or be
Certification of Exempt Wholesale time on the specified comment date.
listed as a contact for an intervenor
Generator Status of Buckthorn Wind, Protests may be considered, but
must create and validate an
LLC. intervention is necessary to become a
eRegistration account using the party to the proceeding.
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling Filed Date: 6/21/17.
Accession Number: 20170621–5118. eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
link to log on and submit the information relating to filing
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.
intervention or protests. requirements, interventions, protests,
Docket Numbers: EG17–120–000.
Persons unable to file electronically Applicants: Bearkat Wind Energy I, service, and qualifying facilities filings
should submit an original and 5 copies LLC. can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/
of the intervention or protest to the Description: Bearkat Wind Energy I, docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, LLC’s Notice of Self-Certification of other information, call (866) 208–3676
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC Exempt Wholesale Generator Status. (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
20426. Filed Date: 6/21/17. Dated: June 21, 2017.
The filings in the above-referenced Accession Number: 20170621–5149. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
proceeding are accessible in the Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17. Deputy Secretary.
Commission’s eLibrary system by Take notice that the Commission [FR Doc. 2017–13382 Filed 6–26–17; 8:45 am]
clicking on the appropriate link in the received the following electric rate BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
above list. They are also available for filings:
electronic review in the Commission’s Docket Numbers: ER17–1877–000.
Public Reference Room in Washington, Applicants: Southern California DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
DC. There is an eSubscription link on Edison Company.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: Federal Energy Regulatory
the Web site that enables subscribers to Commission
receive email notification when a Letter Agreement Huntington Beach
document is added to a subscribed Energy Project SA No. 193 to be [Docket Nos. AD17–12–000; PL03–3–000;
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC effective 6/22/2017. AD03–7–000; ER17–795–000; ER17–795–
Filed Date: 6/21/17. 001; RP16–1299–000; RP16–1299–001;
Online service, please email RP16–1299–002; ER17–386–001; ER17–386–
Accession Number: 20170621–5087.
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. or call Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17. 002]
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
Docket Numbers: ER17–1878–000. Supplemental Notice of Technical
(202) 502–8659.
Applicants: Southern California Conference
Dated: June 21, 2017. Edison Company.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: Docket Nos.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Deputy Secretary. Letter Agreement Alamitos Energy
Developments in Natural Gas AD17–12–000
[FR Doc. 2017–13384 Filed 6–26–17; 8:45 am] Center Project SA No. 194 to be effective Index Liquidity and Trans-
6/22/2017. parency.
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
Filed Date: 6/21/17. Price Discovery in Natural Gas PL03–3–000
Accession Number: 20170621–5088. and Electric Markets.
Natural Gas Price Formation ... AD03–7–000
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17. ISO New England Inc ............... ER17–795–000
Docket Numbers: ER17–1879–000. ER17–795–001
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:33 Jun 26, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_29187/page/1.svg)
![29068 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 27, 2017 / Notices
3:30 p.m.–3:45 p.m. Break • Vince Kaminski, Professor in Practice This notice is being sent to the
3:45 p.m.–5:25 p.m. Panel 3: Options of Energy, Rice University Commission’s current environmental
To Increase Transparency and • Curtis Moffatt, Deputy General mailing list for this project. State and
Liquidity of Natural Gas Indices Counsel and Vice President, Kinder local government representatives should
Should action be taken to foster more Morgan notify their constituents of this
meaningful, reliable, and transparent • Joe Bowring, President, Monitoring proposed project and encourage them to
price information in natural gas Analytics comment on their areas of concern.
markets? What changes may be • Corey Grindal, Senior Vice President If you are a landowner receiving this
necessary to incent voluntary price of Gas Supply, Cheniere Energy notice, a pipeline company
reporting and improve the accuracy, • Tom Haywood, Editor of Natural Gas representative may contact you about
reliability, and transparency of natural Week, Energy Intelligence the acquisition of an easement to
gas price indices? Discuss the degree to • Drew Fossum, Senior Vice President construct, operate, and maintain the
which the level of voluntary reporting and General Counsel, Tenaska Inc. proposed facilities. The company would
and other developments within the • Joan Dreskin, Vice President and seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable
commercial service model of natural gas General Counsel, Interstate Natural agreement. However, if the Commission
index development impact the Gas Association of America approves the project, that approval
5:25 p.m.–5:30 p.m. Closing Remarks conveys with it the right of eminent
robustness of natural gas indices.
domain. Therefore, if easement
Panelists are encouraged to respond to [FR Doc. 2017–13391 Filed 6–26–17; 8:45 am] negotiations fail to produce an
the following: BILLING CODE 6717–01–P agreement, the pipeline company could
1. Is there a need to develop industry
initiate condemnation proceedings
wide liquidity thresholds? While the
where compensation would be
Commission maintains certain liquidity DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY determined in accordance with state
thresholds for indices referenced in
Federal Energy Regulatory law.
jurisdictional tariffs, should standards Northwest provided landowners with
be developed that would apply to other Commission
a fact sheet prepared by the FERC
uses of natural gas indices? If so, how entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
[Docket No. CP17–441–000]
can such standards be developed and by Facility On My Land? What Do I Need
whom? Can this be addressed through Northwest Pipeline, LLC; Notice of To Know?’’ This fact sheet addresses a
voluntary consensus or through other Intent To Prepare an Environmental number of typically asked questions,
regulatory processes? Are there legal, Assessment for the Proposed North including the use of eminent domain
commercial, or technical impediments Seattle Lateral Upgrade Project, and how to participate in the
to doing so? Request for Comments on Commission’s proceedings. It is also
2. Should the Commission take steps Environmental Issues, and Notice of available for viewing on the FERC Web
to provide greater natural gas price Public Scoping Session site (www.ferc.gov).
transparency and market information,
promote index developer competition, The staff of the Federal Energy Public Participation
and enhance confidence in natural gas Regulatory Commission (FERC or For your convenience, there are four
price formation through increased Commission) will prepare an methods you can use to submit your
transparency and accessibility of natural environmental assessment (EA) that will comments to the Commission. The
gas index information? For example, discuss the environmental impacts of Commission will provide equal
should the Commission consider the North Seattle Lateral Upgrade consideration to all comments received,
exercising its authority under section Project involving construction and whether filed in written form or
23(a)(1) through (3) of the Natural Gas operation of facilities by Northwest provided verbally. The Commission
Act to require market participants to Pipeline, LLC (Northwest) in encourages electronic filing of
report price forming transactions to Snohomish County, Washington. The comments and has expert staff available
index developers? Commission will use this EA in its to assist you at (202) 502–8258 or
3. Is index data sufficiently available decision-making process to determine FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. Please
and transparent? Does the commercial whether the project is in the public carefully follow these instructions so
service model negatively or positively convenience and necessity. that your comments are properly
impact price formation? What actions, This notice announces the opening of recorded.
policies, or trends have impacted price the scoping process the Commission (1) You can file your comments
discovery? Is there additional will use to gather input from the public electronically using the eComment
information market participants need to and interested agencies on the project. feature on the Commission’s Web site
ensure robust natural gas price You can make a difference by providing (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
formation? Who should provide that us with your specific comments or Documents and Filings. This is an easy
information? How would that concerns about the project. Your method for submitting brief, text-only
information be shared? comments should focus on the potential comments on a project; or
environmental effects, reasonable (2) You can file your comments
Panelists: alternatives, and measures to avoid or electronically by using the eFiling
• Greg Leonard, Vice President, lessen environmental impacts. Your feature on the Commission’s Web site
Cornerstone Research input will help the Commission staff (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
• Orlando Alvarez, President and CEO, determine what issues they need to Documents and Filings. With eFiling,
BP Energy Company evaluate in the EA. To ensure that your you can provide comments in a variety
• Mark Callahan, Editorial Director for comments are timely and properly of formats by attaching them as a file
Platts North America, S&P Global recorded, please send your comments so with your submission. New eFiling
• J.C. Kneale, Vice President of North that the Commission receives them in users must first create an account by
American Natural Gas, Power & NGL Washington, DC on or before July 21, clicking on ‘‘eRegister.’’ If you are filing
Markets, InterContinental Exchange 2017. a comment on a particular project,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:33 Jun 26, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_29187/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:14:30
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:14:30
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 29065 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR