82 FR 29418 - Air Plan Approval; Georgia: Permit Exemptions and Definitions
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 124 (June 29, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 124 (June 29, 2017)
| Page Range | 29418-29421 | |
| FR Document | 2017-13536 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 124 (Thursday, June 29, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 29418-29421] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-13536] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R04-OAR-2007-0113; FRL-9964-06-Region 4] Air Plan Approval; Georgia: Permit Exemptions and Definitions AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving portions of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Georgia, through the Georgia Department of Natural Resources' Environmental Protection Division (GA EPD), on September 19, 2006, with a clarification submitted on November 6, 2006. This direct final action approves changes to existing minor source permitting exemptions and approves a definition related to minor source permitting exemptions. EPA is approving these portions of this SIP revision because the State has demonstrated that they are consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). DATES: This direct final rule is effective August 28, 2017 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by July 31, 2017. If EPA receives such comment, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04- OAR-2007-0113 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Akers can be reached via telephone at (404) [[Page 29419]] 562-9089 or via electronic mail at akers.brad@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On September 19, 2006, GA EPD submitted SIP revisions to EPA for review and approval into the Georgia SIP. GA EPD submitted a clarification on November 6, 2006, which fixed typographical errors in the original submission. The submission contains changes to a number of Georgia's air quality rules at Rule 391-3-1. EPA is approving the portions of the SIP revisions that modify Rule 391-3-1-.01-- ``Definitions,'' and Rule 391-3-1-.03(6)--``Exemptions.'' The changes requested by Georgia in the SIP revision are discussed below in Section II. EPA is not acting on the changes to the following rule sections proposed by Georgia because the rule sections are not incorporated into the SIP: Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(ppp)--``Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators''; Rule 391-3-1-.02(8)--``New Source Performance Standards''; Rule 391-3-1-.02(9)--``Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants''; Rule 391-3-1-.03(9)--``Permit Fees''; and Rule 391-3- 1-.03(10)--``Title V Operating Permits. EPA is not acting on changes to Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(ooo)--``Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Requirements,'' included in the September 19, 2006, submittal because the changes were withdrawn from EPA consideration by the State in a letter dated January 25, 2016. EPA is not acting on changes to Rule 391-3-1-.02(6)-- ``Specific Monitoring and Reporting Requirements for Particular Sources--Emission Statements,'' at paragraph (a)(4) because a subsequent revision to the rules, submitted on March 5, 2007, was approved on November 27, 2009, and supersedes the September 19, 2006, submittal. See 74 FR 62249. Accordingly, GA EPD withdrew this superseded revision to Rule 391-3-1-.02(6) from EPA consideration in a letter dated December 1, 2016. EPA has previously approved the majority of revisions to Georgia rules originally included in the September 19, 2006, submittal. The following revisions were previously approved on February 9, 2010 (75 FR 6309), as corrected on August 26, 2010 (75 FR 52470): Rule 391-3- 1-.01--``Definitions'' at paragraph (llll), ``Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)'' and at paragraph (nnnn), ``Procedures for Testing and Monitoring Sources of Air Pollutants''; Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(d)--``Fuel Burning Equipment''; Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(tt)--``VOC Emissions From Major Sources''; Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(yy)--``Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides [NOX ] From Major Sources''; Rule 391-3- 1-.02(2)(rrr)--``NOX Emissions from Small Fuel-Burning Equipment''; Rule 391-3-1-.02(4)--``Ambient Air Standards''; Rule 391- 3-1-.02(5)--``Open Burning''; Rule 391-3-1-.03(6)--``Exemptions'' at paragraph (b), ``Combustion Equipment'' and paragraph (j), '' Construction Permit Exemption for Pollution Control Projects''; Rule 391-3-1-.03(11)--``Permit by Rule''; and the repeal of Rule 391-3- 1-.05--``Regulatory Exemptions.'' The revisions to Rule 391-3- 1-.02(2)(zz)--``Gasoline Dispensing Facilities--Stage II,'' were approved on December 1, 2010. See 75 FR 74624. The revisions to Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(mmm)--``NOX Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Engines used to Generate Electricity,'' were approved on August 1, 2015. See 80 FR 52627. EPA previously approved the revisions submitted to Rule 391-3-1-.03(6)--``Exemptions'' at paragraph (i), ``Other [sources]'' on April 9, 2013. See 78 FR 21065. EPA also previously approved the revisions submitted to Rule 391-3- 1-.03(6)--``Exemptions'' at paragraph (j), ``Construction Permit Exemption for Pollution Control Projects'' on February 9, 2010. See 75 FR 6309. Finally, the change submitted to Rule 391-3-1-.03(6)-- ``Exemptions,'' at paragraph (g), subparagraph 5, which revised applicability for an exemption for fuel burning operations at municipal solid waste landfills for NOX , was previously approved, as submitted on March 15, 2005, and therefore, is not before the EPA for consideration in this action. See 70 FR 24310 (May 9, 2005). II. Analysis of Georgia's Submittal A. Rule 391-3-1-.01--``Definitions'' Georgia seeks to add a definition of ``pollution control projects'' to its SIP at Rule 391-3-1-.01(qqqq). This definition lists certain projects, described as ``environmentally beneficial,'' that are exempted from the minor new source review (NSR) construction permit requirements under Rule 391-3-1-.03(6)(j). The exemption does not apply to sources subject to major NSR requirements under either Rule 391-3- 1-.02(7) (``Prevention of Significant Deterioration [PSD] of Air Quality''), or Rule 391-3-1-.03(8) ``Permit Requirements'' under paragraph (c), (Georgia's nonattainment new source review (NNSR)). The exemption for pollution control projects applies to minor sources only, limiting any emissions increases from the exempted projects to below the major source thresholds for all pollutants. EPA previously approved the exemption for pollution control projects for minor sources at Rule 391-3-1-.03(6)(j) on February 9, 2010. See 75 FR 6309. In this action, EPA is approving a definition of ``pollution control projects'' at Rule 391-3-1-.01(qqqq). Because this definition only applies to minor sources, it is not impacted by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decision in New York v. EPA, 413 F.3d 3 (D.C. Cir.), in which the D.C. Circuit vacated an exemption for pollution control projects from the federal NSR regulations for major sources. Georgia's major NSR rules are consistent with federal rules and the D.C. Circuit decision on pollution control projects for major NSR. Section 110(l) of the CAA prevents EPA from approving a SIP revision that would interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (as defined in section 171), or any other applicable requirement of the Act. EPA has determined that the change to Rule 391-3-1-.01(qqqq) will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment or any other applicable requirement of the CAA because the change clarifies a previously approved exemption from the construction permit requirements. B. Rule 391-3-1-.03(6)--``Exemptions'' Georgia is revising existing exemptions from minor NSR permitting by adding language to clarify that these exemptions do not extend to sources that are subject to new source performance standards for stationary sources (NSPS) or national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAPs). Georgia's SIP at Rule 391-3-1-.03(6) currently provides exemptions from permitting requirements, so long as the exemption is not used to avoid any other ``applicable requirement,'' such as NSPS or NESHAPS. Rule 391-3-1.03(6)(g)1. currently exempts sanitary wastewater collection systems other than incineration equipment from obtaining minor source construction permits; Rule 391-3-1-.03(6)(g)2. exempts on site soil or groundwater decontamination units from obtaining these permits. The September 19, 2006, SIP revision changes these provisions to reiterate the condition that only systems and units in (g)1. and (g)2. that ``are not subject to any standard, limitation or other requirement under section 111 or section 112 (excluding section 112(r))'' of the CAA--corresponding to NSPS and NESHAPs, respectively--are [[Page 29420]] exempted. These changes became state effective on July 13, 2006. EPA has determined that these changes will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment or any other applicable requirement of the CAA and therefore satisfy section 110(l) of the CAA, because no substantive changes are made to the existing exemptions, and the clarifying amendments provide greater certainty to sources and the public about applicability of the Rule. III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Rule 391-3- 1-.01(qqqq), ``Definitions,'' effective August 14, 2016,\1\ and Rule 391-3-1-.03(6)(g) ``Permits,'' effective August 9, 2012.\2\ Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the State implementation plan, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\3\ EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through https://www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 4 Office (please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more information). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The effective date of the change to Rule 391-3-1-.01 made in Georgia's September 19, 2006, SIP revision is July 13, 2006. However, for purposes of the state effective date included at 40 CFR 52.570(c), that change to Georgia's rule is captured and superseded by Georgia's update in a November 29, 2016, SIP revision, state effective on August 14, 2016, which EPA previously approved on January 5, 2017. See 82 FR 1207 (January 5, 2017). \2\ The effective date of the change to Rule 391-3-1-.03 made in Georgia's September 19, 2006, SIP revision is July 13, 2006. However, for purposes of the state effective date included at 40 CFR 52.570(c), that change to Georgia's rule is captured and superseded by Georgia's update in a July 26, 2012, SIP revision, which EPA previously approved on April 9, 2013. See 78 FR 21065. \3\ See 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Final Action EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the Georgia SIP at Rules 391-3-1-.01(qqqq) and 391-3-1-.03(6)(g) because they are consistent with the CAA. EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective August 28, 2017 without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by July 31, 2017. If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on August 28, 2017 and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993)) and 13563 (76 FR 3821 (January 21, 2011)); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255 (August 10, 1999)); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885 (April 23, 1997)); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 (February 16, 1994)). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249 (November 9, 2000)), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 28, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial [[Page 29421]] review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: June 14, 2017. V. Anne Heard, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart L--Georgia 0 2. Amend Sec. 52.570(c) by revising the entries for ``391-3-1-.01'' and ``391-3-1-.03'' to read as follows: Sec. 52.570 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * EPA Approved Georgia Regulations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date Explanation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 391-3-1-.01....................... Definitions.......... 8/14/2016 6/29/2017, [Insert Federal Register citation]. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 391-3-1-.03....................... Permits.............. 8/9/2012 6/29/2017, [Insert Federal Register citation]. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * [FR Doc. 2017-13536 Filed 6-28-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![29418 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 124 / Thursday, June 29, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
EPA APPROVED GEORGIA REGULATIONS
State
State citation Title/subject effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
391–3–1–.01 .......................... Definitions ............................................................. 8/14/2016 6/29/2017, [Insert ci-
tation of publication]
* * * * * * *
391–3–1–.02(4) ..................... Ambient Air Standards ......................................... 10/14/2014 7/31/2015, 80 FR EPA approved
45609 changes to Rule
391–3–1–.02(4)
with state effective
date August 1,
2013 on June 29,
2017 [Insert citation
of publication]
* * * * * * *
* * * * * No. 62.5’’ for ‘‘Standard No. 2’’ to read (c) * * *
as follows:
Subpart PP—South Carolina
§ 52.2120 Identification of plan.
■ 3. Section 52.2120(c), is amended by
* * * * *
revising the entry under ‘‘Regulation
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS FOR SOUTH CAROLINA
State Federal Register
State citation Title/subject effective EPA approval date notice
date
* * * * * * *
Standard No. 2 ...................... Ambient Air Quality Standards ............................. 9/23/2016 6/29/2017 [Insert citation of pub-
lication]
* * * * * * *
* * * * * changes to existing minor source whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
[FR Doc. 2017–13543 Filed 6–28–17; 8:45 am] permitting exemptions and approves a Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P definition related to minor source etc.) must be accompanied by a written
permitting exemptions. EPA is comment. The written comment is
approving these portions of this SIP considered the official comment and
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION revision because the State has should include discussion of all points
AGENCY demonstrated that they are consistent you wish to make. EPA will generally
with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). not consider comments or comment
40 CFR Part 52
DATES: This direct final rule is effective contents located outside of the primary
[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0113; FRL–9964–06– August 28, 2017 without further notice, submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
Region 4] unless EPA receives adverse comment other file sharing system). For
by July 31, 2017. If EPA receives such additional submission methods, the full
Air Plan Approval; Georgia: Permit comment, it will publish a timely EPA public comment policy,
Exemptions and Definitions withdrawal of the direct final rule in the information about CBI or multimedia
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Federal Register and inform the public submissions, and general guidance on
Agency (EPA). that the rule will not take effect. making effective comments, please visit
ACTION: Direct final rule. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– commenting-epa-dockets.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection OAR–2007–0113 at https://
Agency (EPA) is approving portions of www.regulations.gov. Follow the online FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.
a State Implementation Plan (SIP) instructions for submitting comments. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management
revision submitted by the State of Once submitted, comments cannot be Section, Air Planning and
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
Georgia, through the Georgia edited or removed from Regulations.gov. Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
Department of Natural Resources’ EPA may publish any comment received and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Division (GA to its public docket. Do not submit Environmental Protection Agency,
EPD), on September 19, 2006, with a electronically any information you Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
clarification submitted on November 6, consider to be Confidential Business Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Akers
2006. This direct final action approves Information (CBI) or other information can be reached via telephone at (404)
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:31 Jun 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM 29JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_29542/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 124 / Thursday, June 29, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 29419
562–9089 or via electronic mail at Nitrogen Oxides [NOX] From Major EPA previously approved the
akers.brad@epa.gov. Sources’’; Rule 391–3–1–.02(2)(rrr)— exemption for pollution control projects
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ‘‘NOX Emissions from Small Fuel- for minor sources at Rule 391–3–1–
Burning Equipment’’; Rule 391–3–1– .03(6)(j) on February 9, 2010. See 75 FR
I. Background 6309. In this action, EPA is approving
.02(4)—‘‘Ambient Air Standards’’; Rule
On September 19, 2006, GA EPD 391–3–1–.02(5)—‘‘Open Burning’’; Rule a definition of ‘‘pollution control
submitted SIP revisions to EPA for 391–3–1–.03(6)—‘‘Exemptions’’ at projects’’ at Rule 391–3–1–.01(qqqq).
review and approval into the Georgia paragraph (b), ‘‘Combustion Equipment’’ Because this definition only applies to
SIP. GA EPD submitted a clarification and paragraph (j), ’’ Construction Permit minor sources, it is not impacted by the
on November 6, 2006, which fixed Exemption for Pollution Control United States Court of Appeals for the
typographical errors in the original Projects’’; Rule 391–3–1–.03(11)— District of Columbia Circuit decision in
submission. The submission contains ‘‘Permit by Rule’’; and the repeal of Rule New York v. EPA, 413 F.3d 3 (D.C. Cir.),
changes to a number of Georgia’s air 391–3–1–.05—‘‘Regulatory in which the D.C. Circuit vacated an
quality rules at Rule 391–3–1. EPA is Exemptions.’’ The revisions to Rule exemption for pollution control projects
approving the portions of the SIP 391–3–1–.02(2)(zz)—‘‘Gasoline from the federal NSR regulations for
revisions that modify Rule 391–3–1– Dispensing Facilities—Stage II,’’ were major sources. Georgia’s major NSR
.01—‘‘Definitions,’’ and Rule 391–3–1– approved on December 1, 2010. See 75 rules are consistent with federal rules
.03(6)—‘‘Exemptions.’’ The changes FR 74624. The revisions to Rule 391–3– and the D.C. Circuit decision on
requested by Georgia in the SIP revision 1–.02(2)(mmm)—‘‘NOX Emissions from pollution control projects for major
are discussed below in Section II. Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary NSR.
EPA is not acting on the changes to
Engines used to Generate Electricity,’’ Section 110(l) of the CAA prevents
the following rule sections proposed by
were approved on August 1, 2015. See EPA from approving a SIP revision that
Georgia because the rule sections are not
80 FR 52627. EPA previously approved would interfere with any applicable
incorporated into the SIP: Rule 391–3–
the revisions submitted to Rule 391–3– requirement concerning attainment and
1–.02(2)(ppp)—‘‘Commercial and
1–.03(6)—‘‘Exemptions’’ at paragraph reasonable further progress (as defined
Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators’’;
(i), ‘‘Other [sources]’’ on April 9, 2013. in section 171), or any other applicable
Rule 391–3–1–.02(8)—‘‘New Source
See 78 FR 21065. EPA also previously requirement of the Act. EPA has
Performance Standards’’; Rule 391–3–1–
approved the revisions submitted to determined that the change to Rule 391–
.02(9)—‘‘Emission Standards for
Rule 391–3–1–.03(6)—‘‘Exemptions’’ at 3–1–.01(qqqq) will not interfere with
Hazardous Air Pollutants’’; Rule 391–3–
1–.03(9)—‘‘Permit Fees’’; and Rule 391– paragraph (j), ‘‘Construction Permit any applicable requirement concerning
3–1–.03(10)—‘‘Title V Operating Exemption for Pollution Control attainment or any other applicable
Permits. EPA is not acting on changes to Projects’’ on February 9, 2010. See 75 requirement of the CAA because the
Rule 391–3–1–.02(2)(ooo)—‘‘Heavy FR 6309. Finally, the change submitted change clarifies a previously approved
Duty Diesel Engine Requirements,’’ to Rule 391–3–1–.03(6)—‘‘Exemptions,’’ exemption from the construction permit
included in the September 19, 2006, at paragraph (g), subparagraph 5, which requirements.
submittal because the changes were revised applicability for an exemption B. Rule 391–3–1–.03(6)—‘‘Exemptions’’
withdrawn from EPA consideration by for fuel burning operations at municipal
the State in a letter dated January 25, solid waste landfills for NOX, was Georgia is revising existing
2016. EPA is not acting on changes to previously approved, as submitted on exemptions from minor NSR permitting
Rule 391–3–1–.02(6)—‘‘Specific March 15, 2005, and therefore, is not by adding language to clarify that these
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements before the EPA for consideration in this exemptions do not extend to sources
for Particular Sources—Emission action. See 70 FR 24310 (May 9, 2005). that are subject to new source
Statements,’’ at paragraph (a)(4) because performance standards for stationary
II. Analysis of Georgia’s Submittal sources (NSPS) or national emission
a subsequent revision to the rules,
submitted on March 5, 2007, was A. Rule 391–3–1–.01—‘‘Definitions’’ standards for hazardous air pollutants
approved on November 27, 2009, and (NESHAPs). Georgia’s SIP at Rule 391–
supersedes the September 19, 2006, Georgia seeks to add a definition of 3–1–.03(6) currently provides
submittal. See 74 FR 62249. ‘‘pollution control projects’’ to its SIP at exemptions from permitting
Accordingly, GA EPD withdrew this Rule 391–3–1–.01(qqqq). This definition requirements, so long as the exemption
superseded revision to Rule 391–3–1– lists certain projects, described as is not used to avoid any other
.02(6) from EPA consideration in a letter ‘‘environmentally beneficial,’’ that are ‘‘applicable requirement,’’ such as NSPS
dated December 1, 2016. exempted from the minor new source or NESHAPS. Rule 391–3–1.03(6)(g)1.
EPA has previously approved the review (NSR) construction permit currently exempts sanitary wastewater
majority of revisions to Georgia rules requirements under Rule 391–3–1– collection systems other than
originally included in the September 19, .03(6)(j). The exemption does not apply incineration equipment from obtaining
2006, submittal. The following revisions to sources subject to major NSR minor source construction permits; Rule
were previously approved on February requirements under either Rule 391–3– 391–3–1–.03(6)(g)2. exempts on site soil
9, 2010 (75 FR 6309), as corrected on 1–.02(7) (‘‘Prevention of Significant or groundwater decontamination units
August 26, 2010 (75 FR 52470): Rule Deterioration [PSD] of Air Quality’’), or from obtaining these permits. The
391–3–1–.01—‘‘Definitions’’ at Rule 391–3–1–.03(8) ‘‘Permit September 19, 2006, SIP revision
paragraph (llll), ‘‘Volatile Organic Requirements’’ under paragraph (c), changes these provisions to reiterate the
Compound (VOC)’’ and at paragraph (Georgia’s nonattainment new source condition that only systems and units in
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
(nnnn), ‘‘Procedures for Testing and review (NNSR)). The exemption for (g)1. and (g)2. that ‘‘are not subject to
Monitoring Sources of Air Pollutants’’; pollution control projects applies to any standard, limitation or other
Rule 391–3–1–.02(2)(d)—‘‘Fuel Burning minor sources only, limiting any requirement under section 111 or
Equipment’’; Rule 391–3–1–.02(2)(tt)— emissions increases from the exempted section 112 (excluding section 112(r))’’
‘‘VOC Emissions From Major Sources’’; projects to below the major source of the CAA—corresponding to NSPS
Rule 391–3–1–.02(2)(yy)—‘‘Emissions of thresholds for all pollutants. and NESHAPs, respectively—are
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:31 Jun 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM 29JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_29542/page/2.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 124 / Thursday, June 29, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 29421
review of this direct final rule, so that Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides, Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule Volatile organic compounds.
and address the comment in the Subpart L—Georgia
Dated: June 14, 2017.
proposed rulemaking. This action may V. Anne Heard,
not be challenged later in proceedings to ■ 2. Amend § 52.570(c) by revising the
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
enforce its requirements. See section entries for ‘‘391–3–1–.01’’ and ‘‘391–3–
307(b)(2). 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 1–.03’’ to read as follows:
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 PART 52—APPROVAL AND § 52.570 Identification of plan.
PROMULGATION OF * * * * *
Environmental protection, Air IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
pollution control, Incorporation by (c) * * *
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
EPA APPROVED GEORGIA REGULATIONS
State
State citation Title/subject EPA approval date Explanation
effective date
391–3–1–.01 ................................ Definitions .................................... 8/14/2016 6/29/2017, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
* * * * * * *
391–3–1–.03 ................................ Permits ......................................... 8/9/2012 6/29/2017, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
* * * * * * *
* * * * * approving the provisions establishing Bernalillo County Minor NSR
[FR Doc. 2017–13536 Filed 6–28–17; 8:45 am] accelerated review and technical permit permitting program submitted on July
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
revisions. 26, 2013, as supplemented on April 21,
DATES: This rule is effective on July 31, 2016; July 5, 2016; September 19, 2016;
2017. and December 20, 2016, that update the
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a regulations to be consistent with federal
AGENCY docket for this action under Docket ID requirements for Minor NSR permitting,
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0615. All remove a provision that refers to
40 CFR Part 52 documents in the docket are listed on obsolete ambient air standards that are
the http://www.regulations.gov Web unique to the Albuquerque/Bernalillo
[EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0615; FRL–9963–41–
Region 6] site. Although listed in the index, some County Air Quality Control Board, and
information is not publicly available, remove the reference to the State of New
Approval and Promulgation of e.g., Confidential Business Information Mexico non-methane hydrocarbon
Implementation Plans; New Mexico; or other information whose disclosure is standard in 20.11.44 NMAC. We also
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County; New proposed to conditionally approve
restricted by statute. Certain other
Source Review (NSR) Preconstruction severable provisions submitted on July
material, such as copyrighted material,
Permitting Program 26, 2013, as supplemented on April 21,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
2016; July 5, 2016; September 19, 2016;
AGENCY: Environmental Protection publicly available only in hard copy
and December 20, 2016, which
Agency (EPA). form. Publicly available docket
establish, and pertain to, the accelerated
materials are available either
ACTION: Final rule. permitting procedures, conflict of
electronically through http://
interest, and technical permit revisions.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
Air Act (CAA or the Act), the the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, II. Final Action
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. We are approving revisions to the City
is approving portions of revisions to the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: of Albuquerque-Bernalillo County
applicable New Source Review (NSR) Aimee Wilson, 214–665–7596, Minor NSR permitting program
State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the wilson.aimee@epa.gov. submitted on July 26, 2013, as
City of Albuquerque-Bernalillo County. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: supplemented on April 21, 2016; July 5,
The EPA is approving the following: Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 2016; September 19, 2016; and
The establishment of a new Minor NSR and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA. December 20, 2016. The revisions were
general construction permitting adopted and submitted in accordance
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
program; changes to the Minor NSR I. Background with the requirements of the CAA and
Public Participation requirements; and The background for this action is the EPA’s regulations regarding SIP
the addition of exemptions from Minor discussed in detail in our March 10, development at 40 CFR part 51.
NSR permitting for inconsequential 2017 proposal (82 FR 13270). In that Additionally, we have determined that
emission sources and activities. document, we proposed to approve the the submitted revisions to the City of
Additionally, the EPA is conditionally revisions to the City of Albuquerque- Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Minor
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:31 Jun 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM 29JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_29542/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:17:44
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:17:44
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This direct final rule is effective August 28, 2017 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by July 31, 2017. If EPA receives such comment, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Akers can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9089 or via electronic mail at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 29418 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR