82 FR 29424 - Approval of Missouri's Air Quality Implementation Plans; Reporting Emission Data, Emission Fees and Process Information

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 124 (June 29, 2017)

Page Range		29424-29426
FR Document		2017-13547

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve revisions to the Operating Permits Program for the State of Missouri submitted on March 16, 2015. These revisions update the emissions fee for permitted sources as set by Missouri Statute from $40 to $48 per ton of air pollution emitted annually, effective January 1, 2016. EPA is also responding to comments received on the proposed action published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2016. In addition, EPA is making a correction to the previous direct final rule published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2016. EPA inadvertently approved and codified this action under both part 52 (Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans) and part 70 (State Operating Permit Programs). This final rule removes the part 52 approval and codification and makes a clarification to the part 70 approval relating to the state effective date.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 124 (Thursday, June 29, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 124 (Thursday, June 29, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29424-29426]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13547]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 70

[EPA-R07-OAR-2015-0790; FRL 9964-04-Region 7]

Approval of Missouri's Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Reporting Emission Data, Emission Fees and Process Information

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule and correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve revisions to the Operating Permits Program for the
State of Missouri submitted on March 16, 2015. These revisions update
the emissions fee for permitted sources as set by Missouri Statute from
$40 to $48 per ton of air pollution emitted annually, effective January
1, 2016. EPA is also responding to comments received on the proposed
action published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2016. In
addition, EPA is making a correction to the previous direct final rule
published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2016. EPA
inadvertently approved and codified this action under both part 52
(Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans) and part 70 (State
Operating Permit Programs). This final rule removes the part 52
approval and codification and makes a clarification to the part 70
approval relating to the state effective date.

DATES: This final rule is effective on July 31, 2017.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R07-OAR-2015-0790. All documents in the docket are listed on
the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available electronically at
www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional information. For
additional information and general guidance, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Algoe-Eakin, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 913-551-7942, or by email at algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:

I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. EPA's Response to Comments.
III. What action is EPA taking?

I. What is being addressed in this document?

EPA is taking final action to approve the state's Title V revision
to 10 C.S.R. 10-6.110 ``Reporting Emission Data, Emission Fees, and
Process Information'', submitted by the state of Missouri on March 16,
2015. This revision updates the emissions fee for permitted sources as
set by Missouri Statute. Specifically, section (3)(A) revises the
emission fees section, which is approved under the Operating Permits
Program only, and updates the emissions fee for permitted sources as
set by Missouri Statute from $40 to $48 per ton of air pollution
emitted annually, effective January 1, 2016.
In addition, EPA is making a correction to the previous direct
final rule published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2016 (81 FR
2090). In that action, EPA inadvertently approved and codified the
state's submission relating to Missouri rule 10 CSR 6.110(3)(a)
pursuant to 40 CFR part 52 (Approval and Promulgation of Implementation
Plans) and part 70 (State Operating Permit Programs). This action
corrects the error by recodifying table (c) of Sec. 52.1320 back to
its previously approved and codified entry (76 FR 77701, 12/14/11). EPA
is only approving this action pursuant to 40 CFR part 70 per the
state's submission request. Also, the January 15, 2016, direct final
rule approved and added new paragraph (ee) to part 70 appendix A. The
new paragraph (ee) erroneously listed the state effective date of
November 20, 2014. The correct state effective date is March 30, 2015.
This final action revises paragraph (ee) to read as set out in the
regulatory text below.

II. EPA's Response to Comments

The public comment period on EPA's proposed rule (81 FR 2159,
January 15, 2016) opened January 15, 2016, the date of its publication
in the Federal Register, and closed on February 16, 2016. During this
period, EPA received one comment.
Comment: The commenter expressed concern with the intent to
increase fees on pollutant emissions and the subsequent use of those
fees once collected. The commenter understood that the fees were
collected to fund the state's regulatory activities. However, the
commenter questioned how those funds would be used by the state and

[[Page 29425]]

expressed that the EPA ``should insure the first result of spending any
fees be protecting human health and the environment'' and ``unless
strict rules are imposed and regular performance audits conducted in a
transparent and open way, higher fees would be an incentive for
regulators to allow greater pollutant loads with the simple objective
of collecting more fees to support their staff and to increase staff
size.''
EPA Response: CAA section 502(b)(3)(A) 42 U.S.C. 7661a (b)(3)(A)
requires the permitting authority to collect a fee sufficient to cover
all reasonable direct and indirect costs required to develop and
administer the Title V permit program, including enforcement. The CAA
and agency regulation 40 CFR 70.9 require permitting authorities to
submit a fee demonstration with their Title V operating permits
program. EPA has approved Missouri's Title V permit program fee and
determined it meets the requirements of the CAA and EPA guidance
regarding the fee demonstration. The fees also include costs associated
with all aspects of the Title V permit program (reviewing applications,
emissions, ambient monitoring, preparing regulations, modeling).

III. What action is EPA taking?

Upon review and consideration of comments received, EPA is taking
final action to approve the state's Title V revision to 10 C.S.R. 10-
6.110 ``Reporting Emission Data, Emission Fees, and Process
Information'', submitted by the state of Missouri on March 16, 2015.
Based upon review of the state's revision and relevant requirements of
the CAA, EPA believes that this revision meets applicable requirements
and does not adversely impact air quality in Missouri.
EPA is also making a correction which will remove approval of the
state's submission from 40 CFR part 52, specifically Sec. 52.1320(c),
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations and revert to the previously codified
table (76 FR 77701, 12/14/11). This action also revises paragraph (ee)
part 70, appendix A to correct the state effective date.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
Missouri amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. Therefore, these
materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the State
implementation plan, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into
that plan, are fully Federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113
of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's
approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director of the
Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\ EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 7 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
section of this preamble for more information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The action is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that
a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule
does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by August 28, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate

[[Page 29426]]

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.

40 CFR Part 70

Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: June 12, 2017.
Edward H. Chu,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR parts 52
and 70 as set forth below:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, paragraph (c) is amended by revising the entry for
10-6.110 to read as follows:

Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.

* * * * *
(c) * * *

EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective EPA approval Explanation
date date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
Regulations for the State of Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * *
10-6.110....................... Submission of Emission 9/30/10 12/14/11, 76 FR Section (3)(A),
Data, Emission Fees, 77701. Emissions Fees, has
and Process not been approved as
Information. part of the SIP.

* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

PART 70--STATE OPERATING PERMIT PROGRAMS

0
3. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

0
4. Appendix A to part 70 is amended by revising paragraph (ee) under
Missouri to read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs

* * * * *
Missouri
* * * * *
(ee) The Missouri Department of Natural Resources submitted
revisions to Missouri rule 10 CSR 10-6.110, ``Reporting Emission
Data, Emission Fees, and Process Information'' on March 16, 2015.
The state effective date is March 30, 2015. This revision is
effective July 31, 2017.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-13547 Filed 6-28-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

29424 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 124 / Thursday, June 29, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

EPA APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE NEW MEXICO SIP
State
Name of SIP Applicable geographic or submittal/ EPA approval date Explanation
Provisions nonattainment area effective
date

* * * * * * *
City of Albuquerque Clarification City of Albuquerque—Bernalillo 4/21/2016 6/29/2017, [Insert Federal Reg-
Letter on Minor NSR SIP. County. ister citation].
City of Albuquerque Clarification City of Albuquerque-Bernalillo 6/5/2016 6/29/2017, [Insert Federal Reg-
Letter Providing Public Notices of County. ister citation].
Minor NSR to EPA.
City of Albuquerque Letter regard- City of Albuquerque-Bernalillo 9/19/2016 6/29/2017, [Insert Federal Reg-
ing Public Notice for Minor NSR. County. ister citation].
City of Albuquerque Minor NSR City of Albuquerque-Bernalillo 12/20/2016 6/29/2017, [Insert Federal Reg-
Commitment Letter. County. ister citation].

[FR Doc. 2017–13449 Filed 6–28–17; 8:45 am] No. EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0790. All emissions fee for permitted sources as
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P documents in the docket are listed on set by Missouri Statute from $40 to $48
the http://www.regulations.gov Web per ton of air pollution emitted
site. Although listed in the index, some annually, effective January 1, 2016.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION information is not publicly available, In addition, EPA is making a
AGENCY i.e., CBI or other information whose correction to the previous direct final
disclosure is restricted by statute. rule published in the Federal Register
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70 Certain other material, such as on January 15, 2016 (81 FR 2090). In
[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0790; FRL 9964–04- copyrighted material, is not placed on that action, EPA inadvertently approved
Region 7] the Internet and will be publicly and codified the state’s submission
available only in hard copy form. relating to Missouri rule 10 CSR
Approval of Missouri’s Air Quality Publicly available docket materials are 6.110(3)(a) pursuant to 40 CFR part 52
Implementation Plans; Reporting available electronically at (Approval and Promulgation of
Emission Data, Emission Fees and www.regulations.gov or please contact Implementation Plans) and part 70
Process Information the person identified in the FOR FURTHER (State Operating Permit Programs). This
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
AGENCY: Environmental Protection action corrects the error by recodifying
additional information. For additional
Agency (EPA). table (c) of § 52.1320 back to its
information and general guidance,
ACTION: Final rule and correcting previously approved and codified entry
please visit http://www2.epa.gov/
amendment. (76 FR 77701, 12/14/11). EPA is only
dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
approving this action pursuant to 40
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CFR part 70 per the state’s submission
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Amy Algoe-Eakin, Environmental request. Also, the January 15, 2016,
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
Protection Agency, Air Planning and direct final rule approved and added
approve revisions to the Operating
Development Branch, 11201 Renner new paragraph (ee) to part 70 appendix
Permits Program for the State of
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at A. The new paragraph (ee) erroneously
Missouri submitted on March 16, 2015.
913–551–7942, or by email at algoe- listed the state effective date of
These revisions update the emissions
eakin.amy@epa.gov. November 20, 2014. The correct state
fee for permitted sources as set by
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: effective date is March 30, 2015. This
Missouri Statute from $40 to $48 per ton
of air pollution emitted annually, Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ final action revises paragraph (ee) to
effective January 1, 2016. EPA is also or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section read as set out in the regulatory text
responding to comments received on the provides additional information by below.
proposed action published in the addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. EPA’s Response to Comments
Federal Register on January 15, 2016. In
addition, EPA is making a correction to II. EPA’s Response to Comments. The public comment period on EPA’s
the previous direct final rule published III. What action is EPA taking?
proposed rule (81 FR 2159, January 15,
in the Federal Register on January 15, I. What is being addressed in this 2016) opened January 15, 2016, the date
2016. EPA inadvertently approved and document? of its publication in the Federal
codified this action under both part 52 EPA is taking final action to approve Register, and closed on February 16,
(Approval and Promulgation of the state’s Title V revision to 10 C.S.R. 2016. During this period, EPA received
Implementation Plans) and part 70 10–6.110 ‘‘Reporting Emission Data, one comment.
(State Operating Permit Programs). This Emission Fees, and Process Comment: The commenter expressed
final rule removes the part 52 approval Information’’, submitted by the state of concern with the intent to increase fees
and codification and makes a Missouri on March 16, 2015. This on pollutant emissions and the
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES

clarification to the part 70 approval revision updates the emissions fee for subsequent use of those fees once
relating to the state effective date. permitted sources as set by Missouri collected. The commenter understood
DATES: This final rule is effective on July Statute. Specifically, section (3)(A) that the fees were collected to fund the
31, 2017. revises the emission fees section, which state’s regulatory activities. However,
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a is approved under the Operating the commenter questioned how those
docket for this action under Docket ID Permits Program only, and updates the funds would be used by the state and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:04 Jun 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM 29JNR1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 124 / Thursday, June 29, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 29425

expressed that the EPA ‘‘should insure for inclusion in the State • Is not subject to requirements of
the first result of spending any fees be implementation plan, have been Section 12(d) of the National
protecting human health and the incorporated by reference by EPA into Technology Transfer and Advancement
environment’’ and ‘‘unless strict rules that plan, are fully Federally enforceable Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
are imposed and regular performance under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA application of those requirements would
audits conducted in a transparent and as of the effective date of the final be inconsistent with the CAA; and
open way, higher fees would be an rulemaking of EPA’s approval, and will • Does not provide EPA with the
incentive for regulators to allow greater be incorporated by reference by the discretionary authority to address, as
pollutant loads with the simple Director of the Federal Register in the appropriate, disproportionate human
objective of collecting more fees to next update to the SIP compilation.1 health or environmental effects, using
support their staff and to increase staff EPA has made, and will continue to practicable and legally permissible
size.’’ make, these materials generally methods, under Executive Order 12898
EPA Response: CAA section available through www.regulations.gov (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
502(b)(3)(A) 42 U.S.C. 7661a (b)(3)(A) and/or at the EPA Region 7 Office The action is not approved to apply
requires the permitting authority to (please contact the person identified in on any Indian reservation land or in any
collect a fee sufficient to cover all the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
reasonable direct and indirect costs section of this preamble for more has demonstrated that a tribe has
required to develop and administer the information). jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
Title V permit program, including country, the rule does not have tribal
enforcement. The CAA and agency V. Statutory and Executive Order implications and will not impose
regulation 40 CFR 70.9 require Reviews substantial direct costs on tribal
permitting authorities to submit a fee Under the CAA, the Administrator is governments or preempt tribal law as
demonstration with their Title V required to approve a submission that specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
operating permits program. EPA has complies with the provisions of the Act FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
approved Missouri’s Title V permit and applicable Federal regulations. 42 The Congressional Review Act, 5
program fee and determined it meets the U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
requirements of the CAA and EPA in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s Business Regulatory Enforcement
guidance regarding the fee role is to approve state choices, Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
demonstration. The fees also include provided that they meet the criteria of that before a rule may take effect, the
costs associated with all aspects of the the CAA. Accordingly, this action agency promulgating the rule must
Title V permit program (reviewing merely approves state law as meeting submit a rule report, which includes a
applications, emissions, ambient Federal requirements and does not copy of the rule, to each House of the
monitoring, preparing regulations, impose additional requirements beyond Congress and to the Comptroller General
modeling). those imposed by state law. For that of the United States. EPA will submit a
III. What action is EPA taking? reason, this action: report containing this action and other
• Is not a significant regulatory action required information to the U.S. Senate,
Upon review and consideration of the U.S. House of Representatives, and
subject to review by the Office of
comments received, EPA is taking final the Comptroller General of the United
Management and Budget under
action to approve the state’s Title V States prior to publication of the rule in
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
revision to 10 C.S.R. 10–6.110 the Federal Register. A major rule
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
‘‘Reporting Emission Data, Emission cannot take effect until 60 days after it
January 21, 2011);
Fees, and Process Information’’,
• Does not impose an information is published in the Federal Register.
submitted by the state of Missouri on This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
collection burden under the provisions
March 16, 2015. Based upon review of defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
the state’s revision and relevant Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
requirements of the CAA, EPA believes
• Is certified as not having a petitions for judicial review of this
that this revision meets applicable action must be filed in the United States
significant economic impact on a
requirements and does not adversely Court of Appeals for the appropriate
substantial number of small entities
impact air quality in Missouri. circuit by August 28, 2017. Filing a
EPA is also making a correction under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); petition for reconsideration by the
which will remove approval of the
state’s submission from 40 CFR part 52, • Does not contain any unfunded Administrator of this final rule does not
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect the finality of this action for the
specifically § 52.1320(c), EPA-Approved purposes of judicial review nor does it
Missouri Regulations and revert to the affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act extend the time within which a petition
previously codified table (76 FR 77701, for judicial review may be filed, and
12/14/11). This action also revises of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
paragraph (ee) part 70, appendix A to • Does not have Federalism shall not postpone the effectiveness of
implications as specified in Executive such rule or action. This action may not
correct the state effective date. be challenged later in proceedings to
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
IV. Incorporation by Reference 1999); enforce its requirements. (See section
In this rule, EPA is finalizing • Is not an economically significant 307(b)(2).)
regulatory text that includes regulatory action based on health or List of Subjects
incorporation by reference. In safety risks subject to Executive Order
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 40 CFR Part 52
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the • Is not a significant regulatory action Environmental protection, Air
incorporation by reference of the subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Missouri amendments to 40 CFR part 52 28355, May 22, 2001); Incorporation by reference,
set forth below. Therefore, these Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
materials have been approved by EPA 1 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:04 Jun 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM 29JNR1

29426 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 124 / Thursday, June 29, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping Dated: June 12, 2017. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile Edward H. Chu,
■ 2. In § 52.1320, paragraph (c) is
organic compounds. Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the amended by revising the entry for 10–
40 CFR Part 70 preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR parts 52 6.110 to read as follows:
Environmental protection, and 70 as set forth below: § 52.1320 Identification of plan.
Administrative practice and procedure, * * * * *
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental PROMULGATION OF (c) * * *
relations, Operating permits, Reporting IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
and recordkeeping requirements.
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:

EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
State
Missouri EPA approval
Title effective Explanation
citation date
date

Missouri Department of Natural Resources

* * * * * * *

Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of
Missouri

* * * * * * *
10–6.110 .................. Submission of Emission Data, Emission 9/30/10 12/14/11, 76 FR Section (3)(A), Emissions Fees, has not
Fees, and Process Information. 77701. been approved as part of the SIP.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION second 10-year maintenance plan for the
AGENCY 1978 Pb NAAQS submitted September
PART 70—STATE OPERATING PERMIT 15, 2009.
PROGRAMS 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
DATES: This rule is effective on
[EPA–R06–OAR–2009–0750; 9963–47– September 27, 2017 without further
■ 3. The authority citation for part 70 Region 6] notice, unless the EPA receives relevant
continues to read as follows: adverse comment by July 31, 2017. If the
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. Approval and Promulgation of Air EPA receives such comment, the EPA
Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; will publish a timely withdrawal in the
■ 4. Appendix A to part 70 is amended Redesignation of the Collin County Federal Register informing the public
by revising paragraph (ee) under Area to Attainment the 2008 Lead that this rule will not take effect.
Missouri to read as follows: Standard
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
Appendix A to Part 70—Approval AGENCY: Environmental Protection identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06–
Status of State and Local Operating Agency (EPA). OAR–2009–0750, at http://
Permits Programs ACTION: Direct final rule. www.regulations.gov or via email to
todd.robert@epa.gov. Follow the online
* * * * * SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean instructions for submitting comments.
Missouri Air Act (CAA or the Act), the Once submitted, comments cannot be
* * * * * Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
(ee) The Missouri Department of Natural is taking direct final action to determine The EPA may publish any comment
Resources submitted revisions to Missouri the Collin County Lead (Pb) National received to its public docket. Do not
rule 10 CSR 10–6.110, ‘‘Reporting Emission Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) submit electronically any information
Data, Emission Fees, and Process Nonattainment Area (NAA) has attained you consider to be Confidential
Information’’ on March 16, 2015. The state the 2008 Pb NAAQS and to approve a Business Information (CBI) or other
effective date is March 30, 2015. This redesignation request for the area. In information whose disclosure is
revision is effective July 31, 2017. directly approving the redesignation restricted by statute. Multimedia
* * * * * request, EPA is also taking direct final submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
action to approve as revisions to the accompanied by a written comment.
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES

[FR Doc. 2017–13547 Filed 6–28–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) a The written comment is considered the
maintenance plan for the 2008 Pb official comment and should include
NAAQS in the NAA submitted discussion of all points you wish to
November 2, 2016, an attainment make. The EPA will generally not
demonstration for the 2008 Pb NAAQS consider comments or comment
submitted October 10, 2012, and a contents located outside of the primary

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:04 Jun 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM 29JNR1

Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:17:13
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:17:13

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule and correcting amendment.
Dates		This final rule is effective on July 31, 2017.
Contact		Amy Algoe-Eakin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 913-551-7942, or by email at algoe- [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 29424
CFR Citation		40 CFR 52 40 CFR 70
CFR Associated		Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides; Volatile Organic Compounds; Administrative Practice and Procedure and Operating Permits