82 FR 29734 - Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Formula Grant Program
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 125 (June 30, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 125 (June 30, 2017)
| Page Range | 29734-29735 | |
| FR Document | 2017-12984 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 125 (Friday, June 30, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 29734-29735] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-12984] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 28 CFR Part 31 [Docket No. OJP (OJJDP) 1737] RIN 1121-AA83 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Formula Grant Program AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs. ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (``OJJDP'') of the Office of Justice Programs (``OJP'') published in the Federal Register on January 17, 2017, a partial Final Rule amending the formula grant program (``Formula Grant Program'') regulation. This technical correction corrects inaccurate citations to sections of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (the ``Act'') in the partial Final Rule. DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective June 30, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Thompson, Senior Advisor, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, at 202-307-5911. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The OJJDP Formula Grant Program is authorized by the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (``JJDPA''), which authorizes OJJDP to provide an annual grant to each State to improve its juvenile justice system and to support juvenile delinquency prevention programs. The partial Final Rule that OJJDP published on January 17, and which took effect on March 21, 2017, amends the implementing regulations for the Formula Grant Program found at 28 CFR part 31. In particular, Sec. 31.303(f)(5) amends States' reporting requirements in several aspects. This technical correction simply corrects inaccurate references to sections of the Act cited in the partial Final Rule. How This Document Complies With the Federal Administrative Requirements for Rulemaking A. Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563 This technical correction has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' section 1(b), The Principles of Regulation, and Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' section 1, General Principles of Regulation. This technical correction is limited to amending the citations to sections of the Act and, therefore, is not a ``regulation'' or ``rule'' as defined by that Executive Order. B. Executive Order 13132 This technical correction to the partial Final Rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' OJP has determined that this technical correction does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. C. Executive Order 12988 This technical correction to the partial Final Rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil Justice Reform.'' D. Administrative Procedures Act This technical correction simply corrects citations to sections of the Act in the partial Final Rule published on January 17, 2017 and, accordingly, OJP finds it unnecessary to publish this technical correction for public notice and comment. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b). Similarly, because delaying the effective date of this technical correction would serve no purpose, OJP also finds good cause to make this rule technical correction effective upon publication. See 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). E. Regulatory Flexibility Act OJP, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), has reviewed this technical correction and, by approving it, certifies that it will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because it simply makes a technical correction to the partial Final Rule published on January 17, 2017. Further, a Regulatory Flexibility analysis is not required for this technical correction because OJP was not required to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking for this matter. See 5 U.S.C. 604. F. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 This technical correction is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 804. This technical correction will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets. G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 This technical correction was not preceded by a published notice of proposed rulemaking; will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year; will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments; and does not contain significant intergovernmental mandates. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1535. H. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 This technical correction does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521. List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 31 Authority and Issuance. PART 31--OJJDP GRANT PROGRAMS 0 1. The authority citation for 28 CFR part 31 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 5611(b); 42 U.S.C. 5631-5633. Subpart A--Formula Grants Sec. 31.303 [Amended] 0 2. In Sec. 31.303(f)(5), remove the words ``42 U.S.C. 5633(a)(12), (13), and (14)'' and add in their place ``42 U.S.C. 5633(a)(11), (12), and (13)''. [[Page 29735]] Dated: June 12, 2017. Alan R. Hanson, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs. [FR Doc. 2017-12984 Filed 6-29-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
![29734 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 125 / Friday, June 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *.’’ How This Document Complies With the January 17, 2017. Further, a Regulatory
Martin V. Franks,
Federal Administrative Requirements Flexibility analysis is not required for
for Rulemaking this technical correction because OJP
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
was not required to publish a general
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief A. Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Counsel (Procedure and Administration). notice of proposed rulemaking for this
Order 13563
[FR Doc. 2017–13631 Filed 6–29–17; 8:45 am]
matter. See 5 U.S.C. 604.
This technical correction has been
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P drafted and reviewed in accordance F. Small Business Regulatory
with Executive Order 12866, Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’
This technical correction is not a
section 1(b), The Principles of
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE major rule as defined by section 251 of
Regulation, and Executive Order 13563,
the Small Business Regulatory
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
28 CFR Part 31 Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5
Review,’’ section 1, General Principles
of Regulation. This technical correction U.S.C. 804. This technical correction
[Docket No. OJP (OJJDP) 1737] is limited to amending the citations to will not result in an annual effect on the
sections of the Act and, therefore, is not economy of $100 million or more; a
RIN 1121–AA83 a ‘‘regulation’’ or ‘‘rule’’ as defined by major increase in costs or prices; or
that Executive Order. significant adverse effects on
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency competition, employment, investment,
Prevention Act Formula Grant Program B. Executive Order 13132 productivity, innovation, or on the
This technical correction to the partial ability of United States-based
AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs. Final Rule will not have substantial enterprises to compete with foreign-
direct effects on the States, on the based enterprises in domestic and
Final rule; correcting
ACTION:
export markets.
amendments. relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
distribution of power and 1995
SUMMARY: The Office of Juvenile Justice
responsibilities among the various
and Delinquency Prevention (‘‘OJJDP’’)
levels of government. Therefore, in This technical correction was not
of the Office of Justice Programs (‘‘OJP’’)
accordance with section 6 of Executive preceded by a published notice of
published in the Federal Register on
Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’ OJP has proposed rulemaking; will not result in
January 17, 2017, a partial Final Rule
determined that this technical the expenditure by State, local, and
amending the formula grant program
correction does not have sufficient tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
(‘‘Formula Grant Program’’) regulation.
federalism implications to warrant the by the private sector, of $100 million or
This technical correction corrects
preparation of a federalism summary more in any one year; will not
inaccurate citations to sections of the
impact statement. significantly or uniquely affect small
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention Act (the ‘‘Act’’) in the partial C. Executive Order 12988 governments; and does not contain
Final Rule. significant intergovernmental mandates.
This technical correction to the partial Therefore, no actions were deemed
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is Final Rule meets the applicable necessary under the provisions of the
effective June 30, 2017. standards set forth in sections 3(a) and Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1535.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Justice Reform.’’
Gregory Thompson, Senior Advisor, H. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Office of Juvenile Justice and D. Administrative Procedures Act
Delinquency Prevention, at 202–307– This technical correction simply This technical correction does not
5911. corrects citations to sections of the Act impose any new reporting or
in the partial Final Rule published on recordkeeping requirements under the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
January 17, 2017 and, accordingly, OJP
Background finds it unnecessary to publish this 3501–3521.
technical correction for public notice
The OJJDP Formula Grant Program is List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 31
and comment. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
authorized by the Juvenile Justice and Similarly, because delaying the effective Authority and Issuance.
Delinquency Prevention Act (‘‘JJDPA’’), date of this technical correction would
which authorizes OJJDP to provide an serve no purpose, OJP also finds good PART 31—OJJDP GRANT PROGRAMS
annual grant to each State to improve its cause to make this rule technical
juvenile justice system and to support correction effective upon publication. ■ 1. The authority citation for 28 CFR
juvenile delinquency prevention See 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). part 31 continues to read as follows:
programs. The partial Final Rule that
OJJDP published on January 17, and E. Regulatory Flexibility Act Authority: 42 U.S.C. 5611(b); 42 U.S.C.
which took effect on March 21, 2017, OJP, in accordance with the 5631–5633.
amends the implementing regulations Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
Subpart A—Formula Grants
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
for the Formula Grant Program found at 605(b), has reviewed this technical
28 CFR part 31. In particular, correction and, by approving it, certifies § 31.303 [Amended]
§ 31.303(f)(5) amends States’ reporting that it will not have a significant
requirements in several aspects. This economic impact on a substantial ■ 2. In § 31.303(f)(5), remove the words
technical correction simply corrects number of small entities because it ‘‘42 U.S.C. 5633(a)(12), (13), and (14)’’
inaccurate references to sections of the simply makes a technical correction to and add in their place ‘‘42 U.S.C.
Act cited in the partial Final Rule. the partial Final Rule published on 5633(a)(11), (12), and (13)’’.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Jun 29, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM 30JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_29859/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 125 / Friday, June 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 29735
Dated: June 12, 2017. DHS Department of Homeland Security based on a number of these statutes and
Alan R. Hanson, FR Federal Register Executive orders and we discuss First
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Amendment rights of protestors.
Acting Assistant Attorney General, Office of
§ Section
Justice Programs.
U.S.C. United States Code A. Regulatory Planning and Review
[FR Doc. 2017–12984 Filed 6–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P II. Background, Purpose, and Legal E.O.s 12866 (‘‘Regulatory Planning
Basis and Review’’) and 13563 (‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review’’)
On March 30, 2017 the Coast Guard direct agencies to assess the costs and
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND published an NPRM in the Federal benefits of available regulatory
SECURITY Register (82 FR 15660) entitled ‘‘Special alternatives and, if regulation is
Local Regulation; Washburn Board necessary, to select regulatory
Coast Guard Across the Bay, Lake Superior; approaches that maximize net benefits
Chequamegon Bay, WI.’’ The NPRM including potential economic,
33 CFR Part 100 proposed to establish a no-wake zone environmental, public health and safety
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0169] within Chequamegon Bay on an annual effects, distributive impacts, and equity.
basis during the Washburn Board E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance
RIN 1625–AA08
Across the Bay paddle craft event, and of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
Special Local Regulation; Washburn invited comments on our proposed reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
Board Across the Bay, Lake Superior; regulatory action related to this paddle and of promoting flexibility. Executive
Chequamegon Bay, WI craft event. The aforementioned NPRM Order 13771 (‘‘Reducing Regulation and
was open for comment for 30 days in Controlling Regulatory Costs’’), directs
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. which no comments were received. agencies to reduce regulation and
ACTION: Final rule. III. Discussion of Comments, Changes, control regulatory costs and provides
and the Rule that ‘‘for every one new regulation
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will issued, at least two prior regulations be
establish a permanent special local As noted above, we received no identified for elimination, and that the
regulation on Lake Superior within comments on our NPRM published on cost of planned regulations be prudently
Chequamegon Bay for the annual March 30, 2017. There are no changes managed and controlled through a
Washburn Board Across the Bay racing in the regulatory text of this rule from budgeting process.’’
event. This annual event historically the proposed rule in the NPRM. This The Office of Management and Budget
occurs within the last 2 weeks of July rule will create a permanent special (OMB) has not designated this rule a
and lasts for 1 day. This action is local regulation in Chequamegon Bay significant regulatory action under
necessary to safeguard the participants for the annual Washburn Board Across section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
and spectators on the water in a portion the Bay racing event that historically Accordingly, the Office of Management
of Chequamegon Bay between takes place in the third or fourth week and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed it.
Washburn, WI and Ashland, WI. This of July. The no-wake zone will be As this rule is not a significant
regulation would functionally restrict enforced on all vessels entering into 100 regulatory action, this rule is exempt
all vessel speeds while within a yards of either side of an imaginary line from the requirements of Executive
designated no-wake zone, unless beginning in Washburn, WI at position Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
otherwise specifically authorized by the 46°36′52″ N., 090°54′24″ W.; thence titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
Captain of the Port (COTP) Duluth or a southwest to position 46°38′44″ N., Section 2 of the Executive Order of
designated representative. The area 090°54′50″ W.; thence southeast to January 30, 2017 titled ‘Reducing
forming the subject of this permanent position 46°37′02″ N., 090°50′20″ W.; Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
special local regulation is described and ending southwest at position Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
below. 46°36′12″ N., 090°51′51″ W. All vessels This regulatory action determination
DATES: This rule is effective July 31, transiting through the no-wake zone is based on the size, location, duration,
2017. will be required to travel at an and time-of-year of the Special Local
appropriate rate of speed that does not Regulation. Vessel traffic will be able to
ADDRESSES: To view documents create a wake except as may be safely transit through the no-wake zone
mentioned in this preamble as being permitted by the COTP or a designated which will be 200 yards wide and will
available in the docket, go to http:// representative. The precise times and impact only a small designated area of
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2017– date of enforcement for this special local Lake Superior in Chequamegon Bay
0169 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click regulation will be determined annually. between Washburn, WI and Ashland,
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket The COTP, Duluth, will use all WI during a time of year when
Folder on the line associated with this appropriate means to notify the public commercial vessel traffic is normally
rule. when the special local regulation in this low. Moreover, the Coast Guard will
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If rule will be enforced. Such means may issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
you have questions about this include publication in the Federal VHF–FM marine channel 16.
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Register a Notice of Enforcement,
Junior Grade John Mack, Waterways Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and Local B. Impact on Small Entities
management, MSU Duluth, Coast Guard; Notice to Mariners. The regulatory text The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
telephone 218–725–3818, email appears at the end of this document. 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
John.V.Mack@uscg.mil. requires Federal agencies to consider
IV. Regulatory Analyses the potential impact of regulations on
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
We developed this rule after small entities during rulemaking. The
I. Table of Abbreviations considering numerous statutes and term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
COTP Captain of the Port, Duluth Executive orders related to rulemaking. businesses, not-for-profit organizations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations Below we summarize our analyses that are independently owned and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Jun 29, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM 30JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_29859/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2017-06-30 06:01:35
Document Modified: 2017-06-30 06:01:35
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule; correcting amendments. | |
| Dates | Effective Date: This rule is effective June 30, 2017. | |
| Contact | Gregory Thompson, Senior Advisor, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, at 202-307-5911. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 29734 | |
| RIN Number | 1121-AA83 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR