82 FR 29762 - Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District and the Town of Mammoth Lakes
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 125 (June 30, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 125 (June 30, 2017)
| Page Range | 29762-29764 | |
| FR Document | 2017-13196 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 125 (Friday, June 30, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 29762-29764] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-13196] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0409; FRL-9955-67-Region 9] Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District and the Town of Mammoth Lakes AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District (GBUAPCD) and the Town of Mammoth Lakes portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern emissions of particulate matter (PM) from wood burning devices and road dust in the Town of Mammoth Lakes. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: This rule is effective on August 29, 2017 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by July 31, 2017. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09- OAR-2016-0409 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief at [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be removed or edited from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-4125, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of these rules? C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules? II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules? B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? C. The EPA's Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules D. Public Comment and Final Action III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this action with the dates that they were adopted by the local agencies and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Table 1--Submitted Rules ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local agency Rule No. Rule title Revised Submitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GBUAPCD............................ 431 Particulate Matter (except 05/05/14 11/06/14 paragraphs M and N). Town of Mammoth Lakes.............. 8.30 Particulate Emissions 06/04/14 11/06/14 Regulations (except paragraphs 8.30.110 and 8.30.120). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On December 11, 2014, the EPA determined that the submittal for GBUAPCD Rule 431 and Town of Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code Chapter 8.30 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, [[Page 29763]] which must be met before formal EPA review. B. Are there other versions of these rules? We approved earlier versions of Rule 431 and Municipal Code Chapter 8.30 into the SIP on October 31, 2007 (72 FR 61526) and June 24, 1996 (61 FR 32341), respectively. The GBUAPCD and Town of Mammoth Lakes adopted revisions to the SIP-approved rules on May 5, 2014 and May 7, 2014 respectively, and CARB submitted them to us on November 6, 2014. C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules? PM, including PM equal to or less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10 ), contributes to effects that are harmful to human health and the environment, including premature mortality, aggravation of respiratory and cardiovascular disease, decreased lung function, visibility impairment, and damage to vegetation and ecosystems. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that control PM emissions. GBUAPCD Rule 431 (except paragraphs M and N) and Town of Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code Chapter 8.30 (except paragraphs 8.30.110 and 8.30.120) were revised to be consistent with each other, and to enable the GBUAPCD to be able to enforce air quality regulations governing residential wood combustion and road dust in the Town of Mammoth Lakes.\1\ The EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information about these rules. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Rule 431 may apply to communities other than the Town of Mammoth Lakes within the Great Basin Unified Air Quality Control District if a community is designated a High Wood Smoke Area according to the procedures set forth in the Rule. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules? SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193). On October 5, 2015 (80 FR 60049), the EPA redesignated the Mammoth Lakes Planning Area to attainment of the 24-hour PM10 National Ambient Air Quality Standard, pursuant to CAA section 107(d)(3)(D), and determined that the area met the requirements of CAA section 107(d)(3)(E). Accordingly, the Mammoth Lakes Planning Area is not subject to the nonattainment area requirement to implement either Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM) or Best Available Control Measures (BACM) for PM10 and PM10 precursors in CAA section 189(b) and (e). Therefore, we are not evaluating GBUAPCD Rule 431 and Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code Chapter 8.30 for compliance with current RACM or BACM requirements with respect to PM10 . Should a GBUAPCD nonattainment area take credit for Rule 431 in the future as part of meeting its CAA Part D requirements, then we will evaluate the rule for current RACM or BACM, as applicable, at that time. Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following: 1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' (57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992 and 57 FR 18070, April 28, 1992). 2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,'' (``the Bluebook,'' U.S. EPA, May 25, 1988; revised January 11, 1990). 3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,'' (``the Little Bluebook'', EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001). 4. ``PM10 Guideline Document,'' (EPA 452/R-93-008, April 1993). B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and guidance regarding enforceability and SIP relaxations. The District is not including for SIP approval Rule 431 paragraphs M and N regarding fees and penalties, and similar provisions in Municipal Code Chapter 8.30, paragraphs 8.30.110 and 8.30.120. These paragraphs could lead to confusion with respect to similar federal requirements. The TSD has more information on our evaluation. C. The EPA's Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules The TSD describes additional rule revisions that we recommend for the next time the local agencies modify the rules. D. Public Comment and Final Action As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all relevant requirements.\2\ We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we receive adverse comments by July 31, 2017, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective without further notice on August 29, 2017. This will incorporate these rules into the federally enforceable SIP. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Upon the effective date of this final action, GBUAPCD Rule 431 (except paragraphs M and N) and Town of Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code Chapter 8.30 (except paragraphs 8.30.110 and 8.30.120) would supersede existing GBUAPD 431 and Town of Mammoth Lakes 8.30, approved at 72 FR 61526 on October 31, 2007 and 61 FR 32341 on June 24, 1996, respectively in the applicable SIP. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the GBUAPCD Rule 431 (except paragraphs M and N) and Town of Mammoth Lakes Chapter 8.30 (except paragraphs 8.30.110 and 8.30.120), described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those [[Page 29764]] imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 29, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: November 14, 2016. Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(228)(i)(A)(1)(iii), (c)(350)(i)(A)(3), and (c)(457)(i)(I) to read as follows: Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan--in part. * * * * * (c) * * * (228) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * (1) * * * (iii) Previously approved on October 2, 1991 in paragraph (c)(228)(i)(A)(1)(ii) of this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph (c)(457)(i)(I)(2) of this section, Town of Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code Chapter 8.30 dated October 2, 1991. * * * * * (350) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * (3) Previously approved on October 31, 2007 in paragraph (c)(350)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph (c)(457)(i)(I)(2) of this section, Rule 431, adopted on December 7, 1990 and revised on December 4, 2006. * * * * * (457) * * * (i) * * * (I) Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District. (1) Rule 431, Particulate Emissions (except paragraphs M and N), revised May 5, 2014. (2) Town of Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code Chapter 8.30, Particulate Emissions Regulations (except paragraphs 8.30.110 and 8.30.120), as adopted in Ordinance Number 14-06, June 4, 2014. * * * * * Editorial note: This document was received for publication by the Office of the Federal Register on June 20, 2017. [FR Doc. 2017-13196 Filed 6-29-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![29762 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 125 / Friday, June 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Unit in
terms of
Symbol Quantity Unit Unit symbol SI base
units
W .................... work ................................................................. kilowatt-hour ............................................... kW·hr ............ 3.6·m2·kg·s¥1.
wC ................... carbon mass fraction ....................................... gram/gram .................................................. g/g ................ 1.
wCH4N2O ......... urea mass fraction ........................................... gram/gram .................................................. g/g ................ 1.
x ..................... amount of substance mole fraction ................. mole per mole ............................................. mol/mol ........ 1.
xb .................... brake energy fraction.
xbl ................... brake energy limit.
§ 1037.550 Powertrain testing. [Corrected]action to approve revisions to the Great consider comments or comment
■ 2. On page 74097, in the third column, Basin Unified Air Pollution Control contents located outside of the primary
TABLE 1 OF § 1037.550— District (GBUAPCD) and the Town of submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
STATISTICAL CRITERIA FOR Mammoth Lakes portion of the other file sharing system). For
VALIDATING DUTY CYCLES should California State Implementation Plan additional submission methods, please
read as follows: (SIP). These revisions concern contact the person identified in the FOR
emissions of particulate matter (PM) FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
TABLE 1 OF § 1037.550—STATISTICAL from wood burning devices and road For the full EPA public comment policy,
CRITERIA FOR VALIDATING DUTY CY- dust in the Town of Mammoth Lakes. information about CBI or multimedia
CLES We are approving local rules that submissions, and general guidance on
regulate these emission sources under making effective comments, please visit
Parameter 1 Speed control the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
DATES: This rule is effective on August commenting-epa-dockets.
Slope, a1 ................... 0.990 ≤ a1 ≤ 1.010. 29, 2017 without further notice, unless
Absolute value of ≤2.0% of maximum FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
the EPA receives adverse comments by Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX,
intercept, |a0|. test speed.
Standard error of esti- ≤2.0% of maximum
July 31, 2017. If we receive such (415) 947–4125, vineyard.christine@
mate, SEE. test speed. comments, we will publish a timely epa.gov.
Coefficient of deter- ≥0.990. withdrawal in the Federal Register to
mination, r2. notify the public that this direct final SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 Determine values for specified parameters
rule will not take effect. Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
as described in 40 CFR 1065.514(e) by com- ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
paring measured and reference values for identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– Table of Contents
fnref,dyno. OAR–2016–0409 at http://
[FR Doc. C1–2016–21203 Filed 6–29–17; 8:45 am] www.regulations.gov, or via email to I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office B. Are there other versions of these rules?
Chief at Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For C. What is the purpose of the submitted
comments submitted at Regulations.gov, rules?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION follow the online instructions for II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
AGENCY submitting comments. Once submitted, A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
comments cannot be removed or edited B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
40 CFR Part 52 from Regulations.gov. For either manner criteria?
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0409; FRL–9955–67– of submission, the EPA may publish any C. The EPA’s Recommendations To Further
Region 9] comment received to its public docket. Improve the Rules
D. Public Comment and Final Action
Do not submit electronically any III. Incorporation by Reference
Approval of California Air Plan information you consider to be
Revisions, Great Basin Unified Air IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
Pollution Control District and the Town or other information whose disclosure is I. The State’s Submittal
of Mammoth Lakes restricted by statute. Multimedia A. What rules did the State submit?
AGENCY: Environmental Protection submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
Agency (EPA). accompanied by a written comment. Table 1 lists the rules addressed by
ACTION: Direct final rule. The written comment is considered the this action with the dates that they were
official comment and should include adopted by the local agencies and
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection discussion of all points you wish to submitted by the California Air
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final make. The EPA will generally not Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Revised Submitted
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
GBUAPCD .............................. 431 Particulate Matter (except paragraphs M and N) .................. 05/05/14 11/06/14
Town of Mammoth Lakes ....... 8.30 Particulate Emissions Regulations (except paragraphs 06/04/14 11/06/14
8.30.110 and 8.30.120).
On December 11, 2014, the EPA GBUAPCD Rule 431 and Town of Chapter 8.30 met the completeness
determined that the submittal for Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Jun 29, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM 30JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_29887/page/1.svg)
![29764 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 125 / Friday, June 30, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
imposed by state law. For that reason, and other required information to the (228) * * *
this action: U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of (i) * * *
• Is not a significant regulatory action Representatives, and the Comptroller (A) * * *
subject to review by the Office of General of the United States prior to (1) * * *
Management and Budget under publication of the rule in the Federal (iii) Previously approved on October
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, Register. A major rule cannot take effect 2, 1991 in paragraph (c)(228)(i)(A)(1)(ii)
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, until 60 days after it is published in the of this section and now deleted with
January 21, 2011); Federal Register. This action is not a replacement in paragraph
• does not impose an information ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. (c)(457)(i)(I)(2) of this section, Town of
collection burden under the provisions 804(2). Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Chapter 8.30 dated October 2, 1991.
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Air Act, petitions for judicial review of * * * * *
• is certified as not having a this action must be filed in the United (350) * * *
significant economic impact on a States Court of Appeals for the (i) * * *
substantial number of small entities appropriate circuit by August 29, 2017. (A) * * *
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Filing a petition for reconsideration by (3) Previously approved on October
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); the Administrator of this final rule does 31, 2007 in paragraph (c)(350)(i)(A)(1) of
• does not contain any unfunded not affect the finality of this action for this section and now deleted with
mandate or significantly or uniquely the purposes of judicial review nor does replacement in paragraph
affect small governments, as described it extend the time within which a (c)(457)(i)(I)(2) of this section, Rule 431,
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act petition for judicial review may be filed, adopted on December 7, 1990 and
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); and shall not postpone the effectiveness revised on December 4, 2006.
• does not have Federalism of such rule or action. Parties with
implications as specified in Executive objections to this direct final rule are * * * * *
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, encouraged to file a comment in (457) * * *
1999); response to the parallel notice of (i) * * *
• is not an economically significant proposed rulemaking for this action (I) Great Basin Unified Air Pollution
regulatory action based on health or published in the Proposed Rules section Control District.
safety risks subject to Executive Order of today’s Federal Register, rather than (1) Rule 431, Particulate Emissions
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); file an immediate petition for judicial (except paragraphs M and N), revised
• is not a significant regulatory action review of this direct final rule, so that May 5, 2014.
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR the EPA can withdraw this direct final (2) Town of Mammoth Lakes
28355, May 22, 2001); rule and address the comment in the Municipal Code Chapter 8.30,
• is not subject to requirements of proposed rulemaking. This action may Particulate Emissions Regulations
Section 12(d) of the National not be challenged later in proceedings to (except paragraphs 8.30.110 and
Technology Transfer and Advancement enforce its requirements (see section 8.30.120), as adopted in Ordinance
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 307(b)(2)). Number 14–06, June 4, 2014.
application of those requirements would * * * * *
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Editorial note: This document was
and Environmental protection, Air received for publication by the Office of the
• does not provide the EPA with the pollution control, Incorporation by Federal Register on June 20, 2017.
discretionary authority to address, as reference, Intergovernmental relations, [FR Doc. 2017–13196 Filed 6–29–17; 8:45 am]
appropriate, disproportionate human Particulate matter, Reporting and BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
health or environmental effects, using recordkeeping requirements.
practicable and legally permissible Dated: November 14, 2016.
methods, under Executive Order 12898 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Alexis Strauss,
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). AGENCY
In addition, the SIP is not approved Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
to apply on any Indian reservation land Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code 40 CFR Part 300
or in any other area where the EPA or of Federal Regulations is amended as
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a follows: [EPA–HQ–SFUND–1990–0011; FRL–9963–
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 95–Region 8]
Indian country, the rule does not have PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF National Oil and Hazardous
tribal implications and will not impose Substances Pollution Contingency
substantial direct costs on tribal IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Plan; National Priorities List: Partial
governments or preempt tribal law as Deletion of the Mystery Bridge Road/
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 U.S. Highway 20 Superfund Site
continues to read as follows:
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. AGENCY: Environmental Protection
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Agency (EPA).
Business Regulatory Enforcement Subpart F—California
ACTION: Direct final rule.
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides ■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
that before a rule may take effect, the adding paragraphs (c)(228)(i)(A)(1)(iii), SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
agency promulgating the rule must (c)(350)(i)(A)(3), and (c)(457)(i)(I) to read Agency (EPA) Region 8 is publishing a
submit a rule report, which includes a as follows: direct final notice of Partial Deletion of
copy of the rule, to each House of the the property currently owned by
Congress and to the Comptroller General § 52.220 Identification of plan—in part. Tallgrass Energy Partners, LP, (formerly
of the United States. The EPA will * * * * * owned by KM Upstream LLC and
submit a report containing this action (c) * * * hereinafter referred to as the former KMI
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Jun 29, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM 30JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_29887/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-06-30 06:01:58
Document Modified: 2017-06-30 06:01:58
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on August 29, 2017 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by July 31, 2017. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-4125, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 29762 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Particulate Matter and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR