82_FR_3147 82 FR 3140 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

82 FR 3140 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 7 (January 11, 2017)

Page Range3140-3143
FR Document2016-31188

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 787-8 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports indicating that certain wing side-of-body upper stringer fittings have been installed with faying surface mismatch beyond the allowed machining tolerance. This AD requires inspections of certain stringer fittings, replacement if necessary, and replacement of certain fasteners. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3140-3143]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-6428; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-119-AD; 
Amendment 39-18764; AD 2016-26-06]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 
The Boeing Company Model 787-8 airplanes. This AD was prompted by 
reports indicating that certain wing side-of-body upper stringer 
fittings have been installed with faying surface mismatch beyond the 
allowed machining tolerance. This AD requires inspections of certain 
stringer fittings, replacement if necessary, and replacement of certain 
fasteners. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on 
these products.

DATES: This AD is effective February 15, 2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of February 15, 
2017.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, 
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data 
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 
90740; telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. 
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport 
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information 
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It 
is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by 
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-6428.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
6428; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket 
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and 
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allen Rauschendorfer, Aerospace 
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft 
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone: 425-917-6487; fax: 425-917-6590; email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company 
Model 787-8 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on 
May 11, 2016 (81 FR 29206) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by 
reports indicating that certain wing side-of-body upper stringer 
fittings have been installed with faying surface mismatch beyond the 
allowed machining tolerance. The NPRM proposed to require inspection of 
certain stringer fittings for faying surface mismatch common to the 
side-of-body rib chord, replacement if necessary, and replacement of 
the clearance fit fasteners common to the side-of-body fittings and 
upper side-of-body rib chord with tapered sleeve bolts. We are issuing 
this AD to prevent an unacceptable reduction of the fatigue life in the 
upper side-of-body rib chord. Associated fatigue cracks can reduce the 
structural capability of the upper side-of-body t-chord to a point 
where it cannot sustain limit load, which could adversely affect the 
structural integrity of the airplane.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing 
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and 
the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Reference Revised Service Information

    United Airlines (UA) and All Nippon Airways (ANA) asked that we 
revise the NPRM to reference Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB570018-00, Issue 002, because Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-
81205-SB570018-00, Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015, is currently being 
revised by Boeing. UA and ANA added that by including the revised 
service information for accomplishing the specified actions, requests 
for alternative methods of compliance (AMOCs) will be reduced.
    We do not agree because the revised service information is not yet 
released. In an AD, we cannot refer to service information that does 
not exist because doing so violates Office of the Federal Register 
(OFR) regulations for approval of materials incorporated by reference 
in rules. To allow operators to use service information issued after 
publication of an AD, either we must supersede the AD to reference 
specific service information, or operators must request approval to use 
the new service information as an AMOC for the AD under the provisions 
of paragraph (j) of this AD. We consider addressing the unsafe 
condition as soon as possible a necessity. We might consider issuing a 
global AMOC if revised service information is approved. We have not 
changed this AD in this regard.

Request for Clarification of the Reason for the AD

    Boeing asked that we clarify that the proposed AD was prompted by 
reports indicating that the wing side-of-body stringer fittings that 
were installed with a faying surface mismatch beyond allowed tolerances 
were the upper stringer fittings.
    We agree that clarification of the language describing what 
prompted the AD is necessary. We have changed the SUMMARY section of 
this final rule, as well as paragraph (e) of this AD, to

[[Page 3141]]

include ``upper'' before ``stringer fittings.''

Request for Clarification of Certain Language in the Discussion Section

    Boeing asked that we clarify the Discussion section of the NPRM, 
which stated that the faying surface mismatch produces a gouge. Boeing 
requested that we revise this wording to indicate that a gouge produced 
from a faying surface mismatch is a possibility, not a certainty.
    We do not agree that the description in the Discussion section of 
the NPRM is inaccurate, because excessive cutter mismatch will produce 
a gouge in the mating surface eventually. In addition, the Discussion 
section of NPRMs is not fully repeated in final rules. Therefore, we 
have not changed this AD in this regard.

Request for Clarification of Corrective Actions

    Boeing asked that we clarify the description of the corrective 
actions in the ``Related Service Information under 1 CFR part 51'' 
section of the NPRM by distinguishing certain conditions associated 
with the various corrective actions.
    We agree that clarification of the language is necessary. The 
``Related Service Information under 1 CFR part 51'' section in an AD 
simply describes the various actions in the service information; it 
does not describe the detailed requirements with specific corrective 
actions for specific inspection findings. Therefore, we have changed 
that section in this final rule to simply list the different actions 
provided in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB570018-00, Issue 
001, dated July 1, 2015.

Request for Clarification of Certain Language in FAA's Determination 
Section

    Boeing asked that the word ``other'' be removed from the ``FAA's 
Determination'' section of the NPRM, which specifies that the unsafe 
condition ``is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same 
type design.'' Boeing stated that the unsafe condition resulted from a 
quality escapement applicable to specific line numbers, and therefore 
is not likely to develop in other products of the same type design 
(i.e., the entire 787-8 fleet).
    We do not agree to remove the word ``other'' from the specified 
sentence. In 14 CFR 39.5, which defines the reason for issuing ADs, it 
states that an AD addresses ``a product'' when the unsafe condition is 
likely to exist or develop in ``other products'' of the same type 
design. The product addressed by an AD refers to the airplane(s) 
associated with the incident or specific findings that prompted the AD. 
In this case, the ``other products'' extends to Model 787-8 airplanes 
that are identified in paragraph (c) of this AD--that is, airplanes 
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB570018-00, 
Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015--not the entire fleet. We have not 
changed this AD in this regard.

Request for Clarification of Compliance Time

    Boeing asked that we change the compliance time wording in 
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD for clarification by referring to 
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB570018-00, Issue 001, dated 
July 1, 2015, instead of specifying the actual compliance time.
    We do not agree with the request. Paragraph (g) of the proposed AD 
(which is retained in this final rule) provides the compliance time 
(before the accumulation of 18,000 total flight cycles, or within 13 
years after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first) 
because the Accomplishment Instructions of the service information do 
not provide a compliance time for the inspection. We have not changed 
this AD regarding this issue.

Request for Clarification of Type of Inspections and Applicable 
Corrective Actions

    Boeing asked that we clarify the description of the inspections 
specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of the proposed AD 
as follows: (1) Do a detailed inspection for a machine mismatch 
condition of the stringer 1 fitting faying surface; (2) Do a detailed 
inspection of the faying surface of the aluminum T-chord common to 
stringer 1 fitting for fretting damage; and (3) Do an eddy current 
inspection for cracking of the fastener holes common to stringer 
fittings 1 and 5 through 11. Boeing stated that this will more closely 
match the information and sequence of the inspections specified in the 
referenced service information.
    We agree with the commenter's request to clarify the inspection 
language specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD, 
for the reasons provided. We have clarified those paragraphs 
accordingly.
    Boeing asked that we revise paragraph (h) of the proposed AD to 
clarify the corrective actions. The commenter defined four corrective 
actions (which are also defined in the service information).
    We agree with the commenter's request in part. We do not agree to 
clarify the corrective actions because the actions described by the 
commenter are for the inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD, 
and are clearly specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB570018-00, Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015. Those corrective actions 
are identified in paragraph (g) of this AD as, simply, ``corrective 
actions,'' and are further defined by reference to Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin B787-81205-SB570018-00, Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015. 
However, we do agree to change the title of paragraph (h) of this AD to 
specify ``Modification, Inspection, and Repair'' to encompass the 
requirements specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.

Request for Clarification of RC Steps

    To ensure that all provisions within the RC steps for contacting 
Boeing are captured, Boeing requested that we revise paragraph (i) of 
the proposed AD to refer to repair of the ``applicable condition'' 
instead of just ``cracking.''
    We do not agree with the commenter's request. Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin B787-81205-SB570018-00, Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015, 
specifies contacting Boeing if there is a crack; corrective actions for 
other discrepancies are provided within the service information.
    Boeing also asked that we add the following exception in paragraph 
(i) of the proposed AD:

    Additionally, where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB570018-00, Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015, specifies a compliance 
time ``after the original issue date of this service bulletin,'' 
this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time 
after the effective date of this AD.

    We do not agree to include the compliance time exception. As 
explained previously, the compliance times in this AD are defined using 
specific times instead of referring to the service information. 
Therefore, there are no exceptions to the service information regarding 
the compliance times in this AD. We have not changed this AD regarding 
this issue.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, 
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting 
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial 
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the 
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and

[[Page 3142]]

     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was 
already proposed in the NPRM.
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the 
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB570018-00, 
Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015. The service information describes 
procedures for inspection of the left and right hand side stringer 1 
fittings for faying surface mismatch common to the side-of-body rib 
chord, replacement of the stringer 1 fitting, and removal and 
replacement of the clearance fit fasteners common to the side-of-body 
fittings and upper side-of-body rib chord with tapered sleeve bolts 
from stringer 5 to stringer 11. This service information is reasonably 
available because the interested parties have access to it through 
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the 
ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 5 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                             Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                 Action                                             Labor cost                              Parts cost        product        operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections and modification...........  144 work-hours x $85 per hour = $12,240........................        $100,079        $112,319        $561,595
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary corrective 
action for fretting damage or cutter mismatch based on the results of 
the inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft 
that might need these corrective actions:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                     Cost per
              Action                                 Labor cost                     Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair for fretting damage or      9 work-hours x $85 per hour = $765...........              $0            $765
 cutter mismatch.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that enables us to provide cost 
estimates for the crack repair specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

2016-26-06 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18764; Docket No. FAA-
2016-6428; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-119-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective February 15, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 787-8 airplanes, 
certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin B787-81205-SB570018-00, Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports indicating that certain wing 
side-of-body upper stringer fittings have been installed with faying 
surface mismatch beyond the allowed machining tolerance. We are 
issuing this AD to prevent an unacceptable reduction of the fatigue 
life in the upper side-of-body rib chord. Associated fatigue cracks 
can reduce the structural capability of the upper side-of-body t-
chord to a point where it cannot sustain limit load, which could

[[Page 3143]]

adversely affect the structural integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Inspection and Corrective Actions

    Before the accumulation of 18,000 total flight cycles, or within 
13 years after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs 
first, do the inspections specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), 
and (g)(3) of this AD, and all applicable corrective actions, in 
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert 
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB570018-00, Issue 001, dated July 1, 
2015, except as required by paragraph (i) of this AD. Do all 
applicable corrective actions before further flight.
    (1) Do a detailed inspection for a machine mismatch condition of 
the stringer 1 fitting faying surface.
    (2) Do a detailed inspection of the faying surface of the 
aluminum T-chord common to the stringer 1 fitting for fretting 
damage.
    (3) Do an eddy current inspection for cracking of the fastener 
holes common to stringer fitting 1 and stringer fittings 5 through 
11.

(h) Modification, Inspection, and Repair

    Concurrently with accomplishment of the requirements of 
paragraph (g) of this AD: Modify the stringer fitting fasteners, and 
do an eddy current inspection for cracking of the fastener holes, in 
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert 
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB570018-00, Issue 001, dated July 1, 
2015. If any crack is found, before further flight, repair using a 
method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in 
paragraph (j) of this AD.

(i) Exception to Service Information Specifications

    Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB570018-00, 
Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015, specifies to contact Boeing for 
repair of cracking: Before further flight, repair the cracking using 
a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in 
paragraph (j) of this AD.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local 
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending 
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 
attention of the person identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. 
Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding 
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD 
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the 
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the 
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must 
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must 
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) Except as required by paragraph (i) of this AD: For service 
information that contains steps that are labeled as Required for 
Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (j)(4)(i) and 
(j)(4)(ii) apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step 
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply 
with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps, 
including substeps and identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted 
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection 
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC 
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done 
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy 
condition.

(k) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Allen 
Rauschendorfer, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, 
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 
Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6487; fax: 425-917-6590; 
email: [email protected].

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed 
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do 
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB570018-00, Issue 
001, dated July 1, 2015.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services 
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740; 
telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport 
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated 
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration 
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at 
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 15, 2016.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-31188 Filed 1-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P



                                              3140             Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

                                                 (ii) Reserved.                                       Boeing Commercial Airplanes,                           issuing this AD to prevent an
                                                 (3) For Boeing service information                   Attention: Contractual & Data Services                 unacceptable reduction of the fatigue
                                              identified in this AD, contact Boeing                   (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC                     life in the upper side-of-body rib chord.
                                              Commercial Airplanes, Attention:                        110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;                        Associated fatigue cracks can reduce the
                                              Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 2600
                                              Westminster Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal
                                                                                                      telephone 562–797–1717; Internet                       structural capability of the upper side-
                                              Beach, CA 90740–5600; telephone: 562–797–               https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You                     of-body t-chord to a point where it
                                              1717; Internet: https://                                may view this referenced service                       cannot sustain limit load, which could
                                              www.myboeingfleet.com.                                  information at the FAA, Transport                      adversely affect the structural integrity
                                                 (4) You may view this service information            Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue                 of the airplane.
                                              at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,             SW., Renton, WA. For information on
                                              1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For                                                                          Comments
                                                                                                      the availability of this material at the
                                              information on the availability of this                 FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also                       We gave the public the opportunity to
                                              material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.                 available on the Internet at http://                   participate in developing this AD. The
                                                 (5) You may view this service information
                                              that is incorporated by reference at the
                                                                                                      www.regulations.gov by searching for                   following presents the comments
                                              National Archives and Records                           and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–                      received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
                                              Administration (NARA). For information on               6428.                                                  response to each comment.
                                              the availability of this material at NARA, call         Examining the AD Docket                                Request To Reference Revised Service
                                              202–741–6030, or go to: http://
                                              www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-                You may examine the AD docket on                     Information
                                              locations.html.                                         the Internet at http://                                   United Airlines (UA) and All Nippon
                                                Issued in Renton, Washington, on                      www.regulations.gov by searching for                   Airways (ANA) asked that we revise the
                                              December 15, 2016.                                      and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–                      NPRM to reference Boeing Alert Service
                                              Victor Wicklund,                                        6428; or in person at the Docket                       Bulletin B787–81205–SB570018–00,
                                              Acting Manager, Transport Airplane                      Management Facility between 9 a.m.                     Issue 002, because Boeing Alert Service
                                              Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.            and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,                     Bulletin B787–81205–SB570018–00,
                                              [FR Doc. 2016–31187 Filed 1–10–17; 8:45 am]             except Federal holidays. The AD docket                 Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015, is
                                              BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
                                                                                                      contains this AD, the regulatory                       currently being revised by Boeing. UA
                                                                                                      evaluation, any comments received, and                 and ANA added that by including the
                                                                                                      other information. The address for the                 revised service information for
                                              DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION                            Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is                 accomplishing the specified actions,
                                                                                                      Docket Management Facility, U.S.                       requests for alternative methods of
                                              Federal Aviation Administration                         Department of Transportation, Docket                   compliance (AMOCs) will be reduced.
                                                                                                      Operations, M–30, West Building                           We do not agree because the revised
                                              14 CFR Part 39                                          Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200                       service information is not yet released.
                                                                                                      New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,                     In an AD, we cannot refer to service
                                              [Docket No. FAA–2016–6428; Directorate
                                              Identifier 2015–NM–119–AD; Amendment                    DC 20590.                                              information that does not exist because
                                              39–18764; AD 2016–26–06]                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                       doing so violates Office of the Federal
                                                                                                      Allen Rauschendorfer, Aerospace                        Register (OFR) regulations for approval
                                              RIN 2120–AA64
                                                                                                      Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S,                   of materials incorporated by reference in
                                              Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing                    FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification                    rules. To allow operators to use service
                                              Company Airplanes                                       Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,                    information issued after publication of
                                                                                                      Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–                     an AD, either we must supersede the AD
                                              AGENCY:  Federal Aviation                               917–6487; fax: 425–917–6590; email:                    to reference specific service
                                              Administration (FAA), DOT.                              allen.rauschendorfer@faa.gov.                          information, or operators must request
                                              ACTION: Final rule.                                     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                             approval to use the new service
                                                                                                                                                             information as an AMOC for the AD
                                              SUMMARY:   We are adopting a new                        Discussion                                             under the provisions of paragraph (j) of
                                              airworthiness directive (AD) for certain                   We issued a notice of proposed                      this AD. We consider addressing the
                                              The Boeing Company Model 787–8                          rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR                      unsafe condition as soon as possible a
                                              airplanes. This AD was prompted by                      part 39 by adding an AD that would                     necessity. We might consider issuing a
                                              reports indicating that certain wing                    apply to certain The Boeing Company                    global AMOC if revised service
                                              side-of-body upper stringer fittings have               Model 787–8 airplanes. The NPRM                        information is approved. We have not
                                              been installed with faying surface                      published in the Federal Register on                   changed this AD in this regard.
                                              mismatch beyond the allowed                             May 11, 2016 (81 FR 29206) (‘‘the
                                              machining tolerance. This AD requires                                                                          Request for Clarification of the Reason
                                                                                                      NPRM’’). The NPRM was prompted by                      for the AD
                                              inspections of certain stringer fittings,               reports indicating that certain wing
                                              replacement if necessary, and                           side-of-body upper stringer fittings have                 Boeing asked that we clarify that the
                                              replacement of certain fasteners. We are                been installed with faying surface                     proposed AD was prompted by reports
                                              issuing this AD to address the unsafe                   mismatch beyond the allowed                            indicating that the wing side-of-body
                                              condition on these products.                            machining tolerance. The NPRM                          stringer fittings that were installed with
                                              DATES: This AD is effective February 15,                proposed to require inspection of                      a faying surface mismatch beyond
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              2017.                                                   certain stringer fittings for faying surface           allowed tolerances were the upper
                                                 The Director of the Federal Register                 mismatch common to the side-of-body                    stringer fittings.
                                              approved the incorporation by reference                 rib chord, replacement if necessary, and                  We agree that clarification of the
                                              of a certain publication listed in this AD              replacement of the clearance fit                       language describing what prompted the
                                              as of February 15, 2017.                                fasteners common to the side-of-body                   AD is necessary. We have changed the
                                              ADDRESSES: For service information                      fittings and upper side-of-body rib                    SUMMARY section of this final rule, as
                                              identified in this final rule, contact                  chord with tapered sleeve bolts. We are                well as paragraph (e) of this AD, to


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:58 Jan 10, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00010   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM   11JAR1


                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                               3141

                                              include ‘‘upper’’ before ‘‘stringer                     design. The product addressed by an AD                    We agree with the commenter’s
                                              fittings.’’                                             refers to the airplane(s) associated with              request in part. We do not agree to
                                                                                                      the incident or specific findings that                 clarify the corrective actions because the
                                              Request for Clarification of Certain
                                                                                                      prompted the AD. In this case, the                     actions described by the commenter are
                                              Language in the Discussion Section
                                                                                                      ‘‘other products’’ extends to Model 787–               for the inspections required by
                                                 Boeing asked that we clarify the                     8 airplanes that are identified in                     paragraph (g) of this AD, and are clearly
                                              Discussion section of the NPRM, which                   paragraph (c) of this AD—that is,                      specified in Boeing Alert Service
                                              stated that the faying surface mismatch                 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert                   Bulletin B787–81205–SB570018–00,
                                              produces a gouge. Boeing requested that                 Service Bulletin B787–81205–                           Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015. Those
                                              we revise this wording to indicate that                 SB570018–00, Issue 001, dated July 1,                  corrective actions are identified in
                                              a gouge produced from a faying surface                  2015—not the entire fleet. We have not                 paragraph (g) of this AD as, simply,
                                              mismatch is a possibility, not a                        changed this AD in this regard.                        ‘‘corrective actions,’’ and are further
                                              certainty.                                                                                                     defined by reference to Boeing Alert
                                                 We do not agree that the description                 Request for Clarification of Compliance
                                                                                                                                                             Service Bulletin B787–81205–
                                              in the Discussion section of the NPRM                   Time
                                                                                                                                                             SB570018–00, Issue 001, dated July 1,
                                              is inaccurate, because excessive cutter                    Boeing asked that we change the                     2015. However, we do agree to change
                                              mismatch will produce a gouge in the                    compliance time wording in paragraph                   the title of paragraph (h) of this AD to
                                              mating surface eventually. In addition,                 (g) of the proposed AD for clarification               specify ‘‘Modification, Inspection, and
                                              the Discussion section of NPRMs is not                  by referring to Boeing Alert Service                   Repair’’ to encompass the requirements
                                              fully repeated in final rules. Therefore,               Bulletin B787–81205–SB570018–00,                       specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
                                              we have not changed this AD in this                     Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015, instead of
                                              regard.                                                                                                        Request for Clarification of RC Steps
                                                                                                      specifying the actual compliance time.
                                              Request for Clarification of Corrective                    We do not agree with the request.                     To ensure that all provisions within
                                              Actions                                                 Paragraph (g) of the proposed AD                       the RC steps for contacting Boeing are
                                                                                                      (which is retained in this final rule)                 captured, Boeing requested that we
                                                 Boeing asked that we clarify the                                                                            revise paragraph (i) of the proposed AD
                                                                                                      provides the compliance time (before
                                              description of the corrective actions in                                                                       to refer to repair of the ‘‘applicable
                                                                                                      the accumulation of 18,000 total flight
                                              the ‘‘Related Service Information under                                                                        condition’’ instead of just ‘‘cracking.’’
                                                                                                      cycles, or within 13 years after the
                                              1 CFR part 51’’ section of the NPRM by                                                                           We do not agree with the commenter’s
                                                                                                      effective date of this AD, whichever
                                              distinguishing certain conditions                                                                              request. Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
                                                                                                      occurs first) because the
                                              associated with the various corrective                                                                         B787–81205–SB570018–00, Issue 001,
                                                                                                      Accomplishment Instructions of the
                                              actions.                                                                                                       dated July 1, 2015, specifies contacting
                                                 We agree that clarification of the                   service information do not provide a
                                                                                                      compliance time for the inspection. We                 Boeing if there is a crack; corrective
                                              language is necessary. The ‘‘Related
                                                                                                      have not changed this AD regarding this                actions for other discrepancies are
                                              Service Information under 1 CFR part
                                                                                                      issue.                                                 provided within the service
                                              51’’ section in an AD simply describes
                                                                                                                                                             information.
                                              the various actions in the service                      Request for Clarification of Type of
                                              information; it does not describe the                                                                            Boeing also asked that we add the
                                                                                                      Inspections and Applicable Corrective
                                              detailed requirements with specific                                                                            following exception in paragraph (i) of
                                                                                                      Actions
                                              corrective actions for specific inspection                                                                     the proposed AD:
                                              findings. Therefore, we have changed                       Boeing asked that we clarify the                      Additionally, where Boeing Alert Service
                                              that section in this final rule to simply               description of the inspections specified               Bulletin B787–81205–SB570018–00, Issue
                                              list the different actions provided in                  in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of            001, dated July 1, 2015, specifies a
                                              Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–                     the proposed AD as follows: (1) Do a                   compliance time ‘‘after the original issue date
                                                                                                      detailed inspection for a machine                      of this service bulletin,’’ this AD requires
                                              81205–SB570018–00, Issue 001, dated                                                                            compliance within the specified compliance
                                              July 1, 2015.                                           mismatch condition of the stringer 1
                                                                                                      fitting faying surface; (2) Do a detailed              time after the effective date of this AD.
                                              Request for Clarification of Certain                    inspection of the faying surface of the                  We do not agree to include the
                                              Language in FAA’s Determination                         aluminum T-chord common to stringer                    compliance time exception. As
                                              Section                                                 1 fitting for fretting damage; and (3) Do              explained previously, the compliance
                                                 Boeing asked that the word ‘‘other’’ be              an eddy current inspection for cracking                times in this AD are defined using
                                              removed from the ‘‘FAA’s                                of the fastener holes common to stringer               specific times instead of referring to the
                                              Determination’’ section of the NPRM,                    fittings 1 and 5 through 11. Boeing                    service information. Therefore, there are
                                              which specifies that the unsafe                         stated that this will more closely match               no exceptions to the service information
                                              condition ‘‘is likely to exist or develop               the information and sequence of the                    regarding the compliance times in this
                                              in other products of the same type                      inspections specified in the referenced                AD. We have not changed this AD
                                              design.’’ Boeing stated that the unsafe                 service information.                                   regarding this issue.
                                              condition resulted from a quality                          We agree with the commenter’s
                                                                                                      request to clarify the inspection                      Conclusion
                                              escapement applicable to specific line
                                              numbers, and therefore is not likely to                 language specified in paragraphs (g)(1),                 We reviewed the relevant data,
                                              develop in other products of the same                   (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD, for the                 considered the comments received, and
                                              type design (i.e., the entire 787–8 fleet).             reasons provided. We have clarified                    determined that air safety and the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                                 We do not agree to remove the word                   those paragraphs accordingly.                          public interest require adopting this AD
                                              ‘‘other’’ from the specified sentence. In                  Boeing asked that we revise paragraph               with the changes described previously
                                              14 CFR 39.5, which defines the reason                   (h) of the proposed AD to clarify the                  and minor editorial changes. We have
                                              for issuing ADs, it states that an AD                   corrective actions. The commenter                      determined that these minor changes:
                                              addresses ‘‘a product’’ when the unsafe                 defined four corrective actions (which                   • Are consistent with the intent that
                                              condition is likely to exist or develop in              are also defined in the service                        was proposed in the NPRM for
                                              ‘‘other products’’ of the same type                     information).                                          correcting the unsafe condition; and


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:58 Jan 10, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00011   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM   11JAR1


                                              3142              Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

                                                • Do not add any additional burden                        Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015. The                      information is reasonably available
                                              upon the public than was already                            service information describes                           because the interested parties have
                                              proposed in the NPRM.                                       procedures for inspection of the left and               access to it through their normal course
                                                We also determined that these                             right hand side stringer 1 fittings for                 of business or by the means identified
                                              changes will not increase the economic                      faying surface mismatch common to the                   in the ADDRESSES section.
                                              burden on any operator or increase the                      side-of-body rib chord, replacement of
                                              scope of this AD.                                           the stringer 1 fitting, and removal and                 Costs of Compliance
                                                                                                          replacement of the clearance fit
                                              Related Service Information Under 1                                                                                   We estimate that this AD affects 5
                                                                                                          fasteners common to the side-of-body
                                              CFR Part 51                                                                                                         airplanes of U.S. registry.
                                                                                                          fittings and upper side-of-body rib
                                                We reviewed Boeing Alert Service                          chord with tapered sleeve bolts from                      We estimate the following costs to
                                              Bulletin B787–81205–SB570018–00,                            stringer 5 to stringer 11. This service                 comply with this AD:

                                                                                                                         ESTIMATED COSTS
                                                                                                                                                                                       Cost per         Cost on U.S.
                                                                      Action                                                  Labor cost                         Parts cost            product           operators

                                              Inspections and modification ...........................   144 work-hours × $85 per hour = $12,240 ...                  $100,079           $112,319           $561,595



                                                 We estimate the following costs to do                    based on the results of the inspection.                 number of aircraft that might need these
                                              any necessary corrective action for                         We have no way of determining the                       corrective actions:
                                              fretting damage or cutter mismatch

                                                                                                                      ON-CONDITION COSTS
                                                                                                                                                                                                          Cost per
                                                                                        Action                                                          Labor cost                    Parts cost          product

                                              Repair for fretting damage or cutter mismatch ..............................................   9 work-hours × $85 per hour =                         $0           $765
                                                                                                                                               $765.



                                                We have received no definitive data                       distribution of power and                               § 39.13     [Amended]
                                              that enables us to provide cost estimates                   responsibilities among the various
                                              for the crack repair specified in this AD.                  levels of government.                                   ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
                                                                                                                                                                  the following new airworthiness
                                              Authority for This Rulemaking                                 For the reasons discussed above, I
                                                                                                                                                                  directive (AD):
                                                                                                          certify that this AD:
                                                 Title 49 of the United States Code                         (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory                 2016–26–06 The Boeing Company:
                                              specifies the FAA’s authority to issue                      action’’ under Executive Order 12866,                       Amendment 39–18764; Docket No.
                                              rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,                                                                                   FAA–2016–6428; Directorate Identifier
                                                                                                            (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under                   2015–NM–119–AD.
                                              section 106, describes the authority of
                                                                                                          DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
                                              the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:                                                                                (a) Effective Date
                                                                                                          (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
                                              Aviation Programs, describes in more
                                              detail the scope of the Agency’s                              (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation                   This AD is effective February 15, 2017.
                                              authority.                                                  in Alaska, and                                          (b) Affected ADs
                                                 We are issuing this rulemaking under                       (4) Will not have a significant
                                                                                                                                                                      None.
                                              the authority described in Subtitle VII,                    economic impact, positive or negative,
                                              Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:                         on a substantial number of small entities               (c) Applicability
                                              ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that                        under the criteria of the Regulatory                       This AD applies to The Boeing Company
                                              section, Congress charges the FAA with                      Flexibility Act.                                        Model 787–8 airplanes, certificated in any
                                              promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in                                                                          category, as identified in Boeing Alert
                                                                                                          List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39                      Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB570018–00,
                                              air commerce by prescribing regulations
                                                                                                            Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation                Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015.
                                              for practices, methods, and procedures
                                              the Administrator finds necessary for                       safety, Incorporation by reference,                     (d) Subject
                                              safety in air commerce. This regulation                     Safety.                                                  Air Transport Association (ATA) of
                                              is within the scope of that authority                       Adoption of the Amendment                               America Code 57, Wings.
                                              because it addresses an unsafe condition
                                                                                                            Accordingly, under the authority                      (e) Unsafe Condition
                                              that is likely to exist or develop on
                                              products identified in this rulemaking                      delegated to me by the Administrator,                      This AD was prompted by reports
                                              action.                                                     the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as                        indicating that certain wing side-of-body
                                                                                                          follows:                                                upper stringer fittings have been installed
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              Regulatory Findings                                                                                                 with faying surface mismatch beyond the
                                                                                                          PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS                                   allowed machining tolerance. We are issuing
                                                This AD will not have federalism
                                                                                                          DIRECTIVES                                              this AD to prevent an unacceptable reduction
                                              implications under Executive Order                                                                                  of the fatigue life in the upper side-of-body
                                              13132. This AD will not have a                                                                                      rib chord. Associated fatigue cracks can
                                              substantial direct effect on the States, on                 ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
                                                                                                                                                                  reduce the structural capability of the upper
                                              the relationship between the national                       continues to read as follows:                           side-of-body t-chord to a point where it
                                              government and the States, or on the                            Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.          cannot sustain limit load, which could



                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014    15:58 Jan 10, 2017    Jkt 241001   PO 00000     Frm 00012    Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM   11JAR1


                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                                3143

                                              adversely affect the structural integrity of the           (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable               Issued in Renton, Washington, on
                                              airplane.                                               level of safety may be used for any repair,            December 15, 2016.
                                                                                                      modification, or alteration required by this           Victor Wicklund,
                                              (f) Compliance
                                                                                                      AD if it is approved by the Boeing                     Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
                                                Comply with this AD within the                        Commercial Airplanes Organization                      Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
                                              compliance times specified, unless already              Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
                                              done.                                                                                                          [FR Doc. 2016–31188 Filed 1–10–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                      been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
                                                                                                      ACO, to make those findings. To be                     BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
                                              (g) Inspection and Corrective Actions
                                                                                                      approved, the repair method, modification
                                                 Before the accumulation of 18,000 total              deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
                                              flight cycles, or within 13 years after the             the certification basis of the airplane, and the       DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
                                              effective date of this AD, whichever occurs             approval must specifically refer to this AD.
                                              first, do the inspections specified in                     (4) Except as required by paragraph (i) of          Federal Aviation Administration
                                              paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD,       this AD: For service information that
                                              and all applicable corrective actions, in               contains steps that are labeled as Required            14 CFR Part 39
                                              accordance with the Accomplishment                      for Compliance (RC), the provisions of
                                              Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin           paragraphs (j)(4)(i) and (j)(4)(ii) apply.
                                              B787–81205–SB570018–00, Issue 001, dated                                                                       [Docket No. FAA–2016–9113; Directorate
                                                                                                         (i) The steps labeled as RC, including              Identifier 2016–NM–042–AD; Amendment
                                              July 1, 2015, except as required by paragraph           substeps under an RC step and any figures
                                              (i) of this AD. Do all applicable corrective                                                                   39–18772; AD 2017–01–05]
                                                                                                      identified in an RC step, must be done to
                                              actions before further flight.                          comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
                                                 (1) Do a detailed inspection for a machine           for any deviations to RC steps, including              RIN 2120–AA64
                                              mismatch condition of the stringer 1 fitting            substeps and identified figures.
                                              faying surface.                                            (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be                 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
                                                 (2) Do a detailed inspection of the faying           deviated from using accepted methods in                Defense and Space S.A. (Formerly
                                              surface of the aluminum T-chord common to               accordance with the operator’s maintenance             Known as Construcciones
                                              the stringer 1 fitting for fretting damage.             or inspection program without obtaining
                                                 (3) Do an eddy current inspection for
                                                                                                                                                             Aeronauticas, S.A.) Airplanes
                                                                                                      approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
                                              cracking of the fastener holes common to                including substeps and identified figures, can         AGENCY:  Federal Aviation
                                              stringer fitting 1 and stringer fittings 5              still be done as specified, and the airplane           Administration (FAA), Department of
                                              through 11.                                             can be put back in an airworthy condition.             Transportation (DOT).
                                              (h) Modification, Inspection, and Repair                (k) Related Information                                ACTION: Final rule.
                                                 Concurrently with accomplishment of the                For more information about this AD,
                                              requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD:                                                                      SUMMARY:   We are adopting a new
                                                                                                      contact Allen Rauschendorfer, Aerospace
                                              Modify the stringer fitting fasteners, and do                                                                  airworthiness directive (AD) for all
                                                                                                      Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S,
                                              an eddy current inspection for cracking of the                                                                 Airbus Defense and Space S.A. Model
                                                                                                      FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
                                              fastener holes, in accordance with the                                                                         CN–235, CN–235–100, CN 235–200, and
                                                                                                      (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
                                              Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
                                              Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB570018–00,
                                                                                                      98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6487; fax: 425–             CN–235–300 airplanes. This AD was
                                                                                                      917–6590; email: allen.rauschendorfer@                 prompted by reports of cracks in certain
                                              Issue 001, dated July 1, 2015. If any crack is
                                                                                                      faa.gov.                                               areas of the rear fuselage. This AD
                                              found, before further flight, repair using a
                                              method approved in accordance with the                  (l) Material Incorporated by Reference                 requires repetitive borescope and
                                              procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this              (1) The Director of the Federal Register            detailed visual inspections of the rear
                                              AD.                                                     approved the incorporation by reference                fuselage lateral beam and its external
                                              (i) Exception to Service Information                    (IBR) of the service information listed in this        area, and repair if necessary. We are
                                              Specifications                                          paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR              issuing this AD to address the unsafe
                                                 Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–            part 51.                                               condition on these products.
                                              81205–SB570018–00, Issue 001, dated July 1,                (2) You must use this service information           DATES: This AD is effective February 15,
                                                                                                      as applicable to do the actions required by
                                              2015, specifies to contact Boeing for repair of                                                                2017.
                                              cracking: Before further flight, repair the             this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
                                                                                                         (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–                The Director of the Federal Register
                                              cracking using a method approved in                                                                            approved the incorporation by reference
                                              accordance with the procedures specified in             81205–SB570018–00, Issue 001, dated July 1,
                                                                                                      2015.                                                  of a certain publications listed in this
                                              paragraph (j) of this AD.
                                                                                                         (ii) Reserved.                                      AD as of February 15, 2017.
                                              (j) Alternative Methods of Compliance                      (3) For service information identified in           ADDRESSES: For service information
                                              (AMOCs)                                                 this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
                                                                                                                                                             identified in this final rule, contact
                                                 (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft                    Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
                                                                                                      Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
                                                                                                                                                             Airbus Defence and Space, Services/
                                              Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
                                                                                                      MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;                     Engineering Support, Avenida de
                                              authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
                                              requested using the procedures found in 14              telephone 562–797–1717; Internet https://              Aragón 404, 28022 Madrid, Spain;
                                              CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,             www.myboeingfleet.com.                                 telephone +34 91 585 55 84; fax +34 91
                                              send your request to your principal inspector              (4) You may view this service information           585 31 27; email
                                              or local Flight Standards District Office, as           at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,            MTA.TechnicalService@Airbus.com.
                                              appropriate. If sending information directly            1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For                  You may view this referenced service
                                              to the manager of the ACO, send it to the               information on the availability of this                information at the FAA, Transport
                                              attention of the person identified in                   material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.                Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. Information may               (5) You may view this service information           SW., Renton, WA. For information on
                                              be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-                  that is incorporated by reference at the
                                                                                                      National Archives and Records
                                                                                                                                                             the availability of this material at the
                                              Requests@faa.gov.
                                                 (2) Before using any approved AMOC,                  Administration (NARA). For information on              FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also
                                              notify your appropriate principal inspector,            the availability of this material at NARA, call        available on the Internet at http://
                                              or lacking a principal inspector, the manager           202–741–6030, or go to: http://                        www.regulations.gov by searching for
                                              of the local flight standards district office/          www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-             and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
                                              certificate holding district office.                    locations.html.                                        9113.


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:58 Jan 10, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00013   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM   11JAR1



Document Created: 2018-02-01 14:59:10
Document Modified: 2018-02-01 14:59:10
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThis AD is effective February 15, 2017.
ContactAllen Rauschendorfer, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057- 3356; phone: 425-917-6487; fax: 425-917-6590; email: [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 3140 
RIN Number2120-AA64
CFR AssociatedAir Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR