82 FR 31555 - Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 129 (July 7, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 129 (July 7, 2017)
| Page Range | 31555-31557 | |
| FR Document | 2017-14281 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 129 (Friday, July 7, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 31555-31557] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-14281] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-583-853] Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 7, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic products (solar products) from Taiwan. The period of review (POR) is July 31, 2014, through January 31, 2016. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made certain changes to the margin calculations with respect to Sino-American Silicon Products Inc. and Solartech Energy Corp., and, therefore, the final results differ from the preliminary results. We made no changes to the preliminary results with respect to Motech Industries, Inc. The final weighted-average dumping margins are listed below in the section ``Final Results of Review.'' DATES: Effective July 7, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magd Zalok or Thomas Martin, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4162 or (202) 482-3936, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 7, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review.\1\ For the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ These final results cover 12 companies.\3\ The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2016, 82 FR 12802 (March 7, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2014-2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from Taiwan,'' dated February 28, 2017 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2014-2016 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from Taiwan,'' dated concurrently with this notice and incorporated herein by reference (Issues and Decision Memorandum). \3\ The Preliminary Results covered 14 companies. See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 12803. Subsequently, the Department collapsed Sino-American Silicon Products Inc. (SAS) and Solartech Energy Corp. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3-4. In these final results, the Department has determined that SAS should also be collapsed with Sunrise Global Solar Energy. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 3. Thus, these final results cover two mandatory respondents, and 10 companies not individually examined. See Final Results of Review section below, for a list of all of the companies. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, and modules, laminates and/or panels consisting of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not partially or fully assembled into other products, including building integrated materials. Merchandise covered by this order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 8501.61.0000, 8507.20.8030, 8507.20.8040, 8507.20.8060, 8507.20.8090, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030 and 8501.31.8000. These HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope is dispositive.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted with this notice. A list of the issues which parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, can be found in the Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision [[Page 31556]] Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, and for the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we made revisions to our preliminary calculations of the weighted-average dumping margins for Sino-American Silicon Products Inc. (SAS) and Solartech Energy Corp. (Solartech) (hereinafter, SAS- Solartech).5 6 For Motech Industries, Inc. (Motech), the Department made no changes to the Preliminary Results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at comments 4, 7, 10 and 11. \6\ See Memorandum to The File Through Robert Bolling, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, From Magd Zalok, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4: 2014-2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from Taiwan, Final Results Analysis for the SAS-Solartech Entity (Analysis Memorandum for the Final Results), dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rate for Non-Examined Companies The statute and the Department's regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for examination when the Department limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, the Department looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual review in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all- others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .'' In this review, we calculated weighted-average dumping margins for SAS-Solartech and Motech that are not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. With two respondents, we normally calculate (A) a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents; (B) a simple average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents; and (C) a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents using each company's publicly-ranged values for the merchandise under consideration. We compare (B) and (C) to (A) and select the rate closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for all other companies.\7\ Accordingly, we have applied a rate of 4.10 percent to the non-selected companies, as set forth in the chart below.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). \8\ See Memorandum from Thomas Martin to the File, ``Calculation of the Rate for Non-Selected Respondents,'' dated dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of Review The Department determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period July 31, 2014, through January 31, 2016: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Manufacturer/exporter margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sino-American Silicon Products Inc./Solartech Energy 3.56 Corp................................................... Motech Industries, Inc.................................. 4.20 AU Optronics Corporation................................ 4.10 EEPV CORP............................................... 4.10 E-TON Solar Tech. Co., Ltd.............................. 4.10 Gintech Energy Corporation.............................. 4.10 Inventec Energy Corporation............................. 4.10 Inventec Solar Energy Corporation....................... 4.10 Kyocera Mexicana S.A. de C.V............................ 4.10 Sunengine Corporation Ltd............................... 4.10 TSEC Corporation........................................ 4.10 Win Win Precision Technology Co., Ltd................... 4.10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure The Department intends to disclose the calculations performed for these final results of review within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review in the Federal Register. Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, we calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to each importer (or customer).\9\ Where the Department calculated a weighted-average dumping margin by dividing the total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to that party by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions, the Department will direct CBP to assess importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit rates.\10\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is greater than de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), the Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation.\11\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \10\ Id. \11\ Id. \12\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the methodology described in the ``Rates for Non-Examined Companies'' section, above. Consistent with the Department's assessment practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by SAS-Solartech, Motech, or the non-examined companies for which the producer did not know that its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the companies listed in these final results will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margins established in the [[Page 31557]] final results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment in which the company was reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 19.50 percent,\14\ the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 76966 (December 23, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: June 29, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Issues A. SAS-Solartech-Specific Issues Comment 1: Whether Products Shipped to the United States are Third-Country Sales Comment 2: Whether To Exclude Priced Sample Sales Comment 3: Whether To Assign SAS-Solartech's Rate to Sunrise Global Solar Energy Comment 4: Whether To Revise the MFRH/U Fields To Reflect the Collapsed Entity Comment 5: Whether To Revise the Draft Cash Deposit and Assessment Instructions Comment 6: Differential Pricing Comment 7: Cost of Manufacturing for Grade 4 Non-Prime Products Comment 8: Scrap Offset for Two Resold CONNUMs Comment 9: Year-End Adjustment for Items Relating to Profit Comment 10: Loss in Inventory Devaluation Comment 11: Other CPA Adjustment Comment 12: Scrap Offset Comment 13: Rental Expenses Comment 14: Fixed Overhead Costs Comment 15: G&A and Financial Expenses B. Motech-Specific Issues Comment 16: Whether To Apply Partial AFA to Motech's Reported Per-Unit Costs Comment 17: Whether To Deny Motech's Offset for Silver Paste Scrap Comment 18: Whether To Include Fire Losses in Motech's General and Administrative (``G&A'') Expenses Comment 19: Whether To Exclude Motech's Reported ``Indirect'' U.S. Sales for One Customer III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Margin Calculations VI. Discussion of the Issues VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-14281 Filed 7-6-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2017 / Notices 31555
Kodak would be able to choose the duty DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE results cover 12 companies.3 The
rate during customs entry procedures Department conducted this review in
that apply to: Flexographic finished International Trade Administration accordance with section 751(a) of the
plates; aluminum finished printing [A–583–853] Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
plates; thermo imaging layer; direct Scope of the Order
imaging recording film sheets; and, Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products From Taiwan: Final Results The merchandise covered by this
direct imaging record film rolls (duty
of Antidumping Duty Administrative order is crystalline silicon photovoltaic
rates range from free to 3.7%). Customs
Review; 2014–2016 cells, and modules, laminates and/or
duties also could possibly be deferred or panels consisting of crystalline silicon
reduced on foreign-status production AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, photovoltaic cells, whether or not
equipment. International Trade Administration, partially or fully assembled into other
The materials/components sourced Department of Commerce. products, including building integrated
from abroad include: Aging inhibitor; SUMMARY: On March 7, 2017, the materials. Merchandise covered by this
stabilizer; photopolymerization Department of Commerce (the order is currently classified in the
initiator; resins for coating; Department) published the preliminary Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
ethanaminium; inhibitor; coating results of the administrative review of United States (HTSUS) under
solvent; light stabilizer for coating; 3H- the antidumping duty order on certain subheadings 8501.61.0000,
Indolium; photoinitiators; coatings for crystalline silicon photovoltaic products 8507.20.8030, 8507.20.8040,
plates; aluminum finished printing (solar products) from Taiwan. The 8507.20.8060, 8507.20.8090,
plates; flexographic finished plates; mat period of review (POR) is July 31, 2014, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030 and
film sheets; butadiene polymers; through January 31, 2016. Based on our 8501.31.8000. These HTSUS
analysis of the comments received, we subheadings are provided for
thermoplastic elastomers; plate
have made certain changes to the convenience and customs purposes; the
manufacturing chemicals; intermediates
margin calculations with respect to written description of the scope is
for production of printing plates; co-
Sino-American Silicon Products Inc. dispositive.4
polymers; monomers; propenoic acid;
naphthalenesulfonic acid; urethane and Solartech Energy Corp., and, Analysis of Comments Received
therefore, the final results differ from
acrylate polymers; phonolic resin All issues raised in the case and
the preliminary results. We made no
solutions; foam interleave sheets; rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this
changes to the preliminary results with
aluminum coils of aluminum not review are addressed in the Issues and
respect to Motech Industries, Inc. The
alloyed; aluminum coils of aluminum final weighted-average dumping Decision Memorandum, which is hereby
alloys; aluminum coils of a thickness margins are listed below in the section adopted with this notice. A list of the
not exceeding 0.15mm: of a thickness ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’ issues which parties raised, and to
exceeding 0.01mm; and, aluminum coils which we responded in the Issues and
DATES: Effective July 7, 2017.
of a thickness exceeding 0.15mm but Decision Memorandum, can be found in
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the Appendix to this notice. The Issues
not exceeding 0.2mm (duty rates range
Magd Zalok or Thomas Martin, AD/CVD and Decision Memorandum is a public
from free to 6.5%).
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and document and is on file electronically
Public comment is invited from Compliance, International Trade via Enforcement and Compliance’s
interested parties. Submissions shall be Administration, Department of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
addressed to the Board’s Executive Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Centralized Electronic Service System
Secretary at the address below. The NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
closing period for their receipt is August (202) 482–4162 or (202) 482–3936, registered users at https://
16, 2017. respectively. access.trade.gov and is available to all
A copy of the notification will be SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: parties in the Central Records Unit,
available for public inspection at the room B8024 of the main Department of
Background Commerce building. In addition, a
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room On March 7, 2017, the Department complete version of the Issues and
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, published the Preliminary Results of Decision Memorandum can be accessed
1401 Constitution Avenue NW., this administrative review.1 For the directly on the Internet at http://
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the events that occurred since the enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s Preliminary Results, see the Issues and The signed Issues and Decision
Web site, which is accessible via Decision Memorandum.2 These final
concurrently with this notice and incorporated
www.trade.gov/ftz. 1 Certain
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic herein by reference (Issues and Decision
For further information, contact Products From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Memorandum).
Christopher Wedderburn at Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 3 The Preliminary Results covered 14 companies.
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 12803.
Chris.Wedderburn@trade.gov or (202) Administrative Review; 2014–2016, 82 FR 12802 Subsequently, the Department collapsed Sino-
482–1963. (March 7, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and American Silicon Products Inc. (SAS) and Solartech
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
accompanying Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Energy Corp. See Preliminary Decision
Dated: July 3, 2017. Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Memorandum at 3–4. In these final results, the
Elizabeth Whiteman, 2014–2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Department has determined that SAS should also be
Review of Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic collapsed with Sunrise Global Solar Energy. See
Acting Executive Secretary. Products from Taiwan,’’ dated February 28, 2017 Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 3.
[FR Doc. 2017–14279 Filed 7–6–17; 8:45 am] (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). Thus, these final results cover two mandatory
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision respondents, and 10 companies not individually
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2014– examined. See Final Results of Review section
2016 Administrative Review of the Antidumping below, for a list of all of the companies.
Duty Order on Certain Crystalline Silicon 4 For a complete description of the scope of the
Photovoltaic Products from Taiwan,’’ dated order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:56 Jul 06, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_31684/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2017 / Notices 31557
final results of this review; (2) for Dated: June 29, 2017. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
merchandise exported by producers or Ronald K. Lorentzen, (the Department) aligned the 2015–2016
exporters not covered in this review but Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement new shipper review of the antidumping
covered in a prior segment of this and Compliance. duty order on honey from the People’s
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will Republic of China (PRC) with the 2015–
Appendix
continue to be the company-specific rate 2016 administrative review of the same
published for the most recently List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and order covering the same period of
Decision Memorandum review (POR), and is therefore
completed segment in which the
company was reviewed; (3) if the I. Summary conducting the reviews concurrently.
II. List of Issues The POR for the administrative review
exporter is not a firm covered in this A. SAS-Solartech-Specific Issues
review or the original less-than-fair- and the new shipper review is
Comment 1: Whether Products Shipped to December 1, 2015, through November
value (LTFV) investigation, but the the United States are Third-Country 30, 2016. As discussed below, the
producer is, the cash deposit rate will be Sales
Comment 2: Whether To Exclude Priced
Department is preliminarily rescinding
the rate established for the most recently
Sample Sales the new shipper with respect to Jiangsu
completed segment of this proceeding Runchen Agricultural/Sideline
Comment 3: Whether To Assign SAS-
for the producer of the subject Foodstuff Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Runchen)
Solartech’s Rate to Sunrise Global Solar
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit Energy and has preliminarily found that
rate for all other producers or exporters Comment 4: Whether To Revise the MFRH/ Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co., Ltd.
will continue to be 19.50 percent,14 the U Fields To Reflect the Collapsed Entity (Sunbeauty) is not eligible to receive a
all-others rate established in the LTFV Comment 5: Whether To Revise the Draft separate rate.
investigation. These cash deposit Cash Deposit and Assessment
DATES: Effective July 7, 2017.
requirements, when imposed, shall Instructions
Comment 6: Differential Pricing FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
remain in effect until further notice. Comment 7: Cost of Manufacturing for Carrie Bethea, AD/CVD Operations,
Notification to Importers Grade 4 Non-Prime Products Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
Comment 8: Scrap Offset for Two Resold International Trade Administration,
This notice serves as a final reminder CONNUMs U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
to importers of their responsibility Comment 9: Year-End Adjustment for Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
Items Relating to Profit
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1491.
Comment 10: Loss in Inventory
certificate regarding the reimbursement Devaluation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of antidumping duties prior to Comment 11: Other CPA Adjustment Background
liquidation of the relevant entries Comment 12: Scrap Offset
during this POR. Failure to comply with Comment 13: Rental Expenses On December 1, 2016, the Department
this requirement could result in the Comment 14: Fixed Overhead Costs published a notice of opportunity to
Comment 15: G&A and Financial Expenses request an AR of the antidumping duty
Department’s presumption that
B. Motech-Specific Issues order on honey from the PRC for the
reimbursement of antidumping duties Comment 16: Whether To Apply Partial
occurred and the subsequent assessment POR.1 On December 28, 2016,
AFA to Motech’s Reported Per-Unit Sunbeauty requested that the
of double antidumping duties. Costs
Comment 17: Whether To Deny Motech’s
Department conduct an administrative
Notification to Interested Parties Offset for Silver Paste Scrap review of the sales of subject
Regarding Administrative Protective Comment 18: Whether To Include Fire merchandise exported by Sunbeauty
Order Losses in Motech’s General and during the POR.2 On January 3, 2017,
Administrative (‘‘G&A’’) Expenses the American Honey Producers
This notice also serves as the only Comment 19: Whether To Exclude Association and Sioux Honey Producers
reminder to parties subject to Motech’s Reported ‘‘Indirect’’ U.S. Sales Association (collectively, the
administrative protective order (APO) of for One Customer petitioners) requested that the
their responsibility concerning the III. Background Department conduct an administrative
IV. Scope of the Order
disposition of proprietary information V. Margin Calculations
review.3 On February 13, 2017, based on
disclosed under APO in accordance VI. Discussion of the Issues the timely requests for administrative
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which VII. Recommendation review, the Department initiated an
continues to govern business [FR Doc. 2017–14281 Filed 7–6–17; 8:45 am]
administrative review of two exporters/
proprietary information in this segment producers, Shayang Xianghe and
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
of the proceeding. Timely written Sunbeauty.4 On February 28, 2017, the
notification of the return or destruction
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
of APO materials or conversion to DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
judicial protective order is hereby to Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 86694
requested. Failure to comply with the International Trade Administration (December 1, 2016).
2 See Letter to the Secretary from Sunbeauty re:
regulations and the terms of an APO is [A–570–863] Request for Administrative Review; 2015–2016,
a sanctionable violation. dated December 28, 2016.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
We are issuing and publishing this Honey From the People’s Republic of 3 See Letter to the Secretary from Petitioners re:
notice in accordance with sections China: Preliminary Rescission of the Request for Administrative Review; 2015–2016,
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 New Shipper Review and Preliminary dated January 3, 2017.
4 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Results of the Administrative Review;
CFR 351.213(h). Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
2015–2016 10457, 10460 (February 13, 2017) (AR Initiation
Notice); see also Letter to the Secretary from
14 See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Petitioners re: Petitioners’ Withdrawal of Request
Products: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than International Trade Administration, for Administrative Review of Jiangsu Runchen
Fair Value, 79 FR 76966 (December 23, 2014). Department of Commerce. Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:56 Jul 06, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_31684/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-07-07 02:20:16
Document Modified: 2017-07-07 02:20:16
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective July 7, 2017. | |
| Contact | Magd Zalok or Thomas Martin, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4162 or (202) 482-3936, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 31555 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR