82 FR 31739 - Air Plan Approval; North Carolina Miscellaneous Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 130 (July 10, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 130 (July 10, 2017)
| Page Range | 31739-31741 | |
| FR Document | 2017-14397 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 130 (Monday, July 10, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 31739-31741] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-14397] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0362; FRL-9964-66-Region 4] Air Plan Approval; North Carolina Miscellaneous Rules AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve several changes to the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of North Carolina, through the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), on December 14, 2004 and March 1, 2016. The March 1, 2016, submission adds a new rule to the ``Exclusionary Rules'' of the North Carolina SIP, and the portion of the December 14, 2004, submission EPA is proposing to approve adds two new rules under a new section called ``Permit Exemptions.'' This action is being taken pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 9, 2017. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04- OAR-2016-0362 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Lakeman, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404) 562-9043. Mr. Lakeman can also be reached via electronic mail at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Analysis of the State Submittals On December 14, 2004 and March 1, 2016, the State of North Carolina, through NCDEQ, submitted revisions to the North Carolina SIP. EPA is proposing to approve the March 1, 2016, submission which adds a new rule--15A NCAC 02Q .0809 Concrete Batch Plants and a portion of the December 14, 2004, submission which adds two new rules--15A NCAC 02Q .0901, Purpose and Scope and .0902 Portable Crushers. EPA has preliminarily determined that these changes to the North Carolina SIP are approvable pursuant to section 110 of the CAA. The changes that are the subject of this proposed rulemaking are described in further detail below. A. March 1, 2016, SIP Submission The March 1, 2016, submission adds a new exclusionary rule for concrete batch plants (15A NCAC 02Q .0809 Concrete Batch Plants) that excludes from Title V permitting requirements such facilities that operate below a specified annual production rate. The production rate that qualifies concrete batch plants for this permit exclusion is 1,210,000 cubic yards of wet concrete per year, which, based on an emission factor, corresponds to an emission rate below the major source threshold. Subject facilities are required to submit an annual registration to the appropriate regional office and report the quantity of wet concrete produced in the previous calendar year and maintain records of annual production for the previous three calendar years. This annual certification that the facility's production rate is below the specified level ensures continued protection of the NAAQS, specifically particulate matter, which is of particular relevance because concrete batch plants emit particulate matter, including particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 10 micrometers (PM10 ) and less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5 ). These excluded sources must also make prompt reports if they exceed the annual production rate limit, submitted within one week of the date on which the limit was exceeded. The rule excludes from Title V permitting requirements all concrete batch plants in the state that produce [[Page 31740]] less than 1.2 million cubic yards of wet concrete per calendar year and that are equipped with fabric filters or other functionally equivalent control devices to abate emissions of particulate matter, PM10 and PM2.5 , from storage silos and weigh hoppers that receive materials from cement and mineral admixture silos. The annual production limit of 1.2 million cubic yards of wet concrete is designed to limit particulate matter emissions from plants equipped with fabric filters to less than the Title V permitting thresholds and is based on standard emission factors in use at the time of rule adoption.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ North Carolina cites EPA's AP-42 (U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources, AP- 42. Fifth Edition) in its response to comments from the December 14, 2004, submittal included as an attachment to the March 1, 2016, submittal. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. December 14, 2004, SIP Submission The portion of the December 14, 2004, SIP submission that EPA is proposing to approve adds a new section (Section .0900 Permit Exemptions), which includes the following two new regulations: a. 15A NCAC 02Q .0901 Purpose and Scope is a new exclusionary rule which provides for exclusions from construction and operating permits for certain types of sources and activities. Sources subject to Title V permitting requirements are not eligible for exclusion under this rule. Sources eligible for permit exclusions under this rule may still apply for and receive construction and operating permits. At the time of this submittal, only one source category would be eligible for exclusion from permitting under Section .0900, if approved as proposed: Portable Crushers. The rule excludes from general construction and operating permitting requirements all specific listed sources that, due to the temporary, portable, and/or low-emitting nature of their operations, typically do not meet the applicability requirements for air permits, so long as they meet the requirements for the exclusion. These source- specific exclusions contain provisions that limit the sources' potential emissions, such as constraints on operating hours and fuel consumption. The exclusions' use of operational or production-based limits instead of potential-emissions limits would streamline sources' analyses of whether or not they are required to obtain a permit. b. 15A NCAC 02Q .0902 Portable Crushers, is an exclusionary rule which provides for exclusions from construction and operating permits for portable crusher operations that meet the following criteria: [cir] No more than 300,000 tons of material crushed per any 12- month period; [cir] No more than 17,000 gallons of diesel fuel burned during any 12 months (for both diesel generators and diesel engines used to drive crushers); [cir] No more than 12 months of operation at a particular site; [cir] Continuous use of water spray to control emissions from the crushers. Portable crushers operating at quarries with air permits are not eligible for this permit exclusion. The rule excludes from general construction and operating permitting requirements portable/temporary crushing operations, providing the eligibility criteria listed above are met. The eligibility criteria are designed to ensure that these portable crushing operations do not operate for more than 12 months at a site. Records of production and fuel consumption must be maintained, and all equipment at each site must be labeled with unique identification numbers. The eligibility criteria are also based on corresponding emission rates and are thus designed to ensure that potential emissions of particulate matter (including PM10 and PM2.5 ), sulfur dioxide, and oxides of nitrogen from these sources are below relevant permit applicability thresholds. Therefore, the revision will not interfere with attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS pursuant to CAA section 110(l). Crushing operations eligible for this permitting exclusion must still comply with all applicable air quality standards, such as Rule .0510 Particulates from Sand, Gravel, or Crushed Stone Operations, .0516 Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Combustion Sources, and .0521 Control of Visible Emissions, and any New Source Performance Standard, among other state and federal air quality standards. II. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference 15A NCAC 02Q .0809 entitled ``Concrete Batch Plants'' effective April 1, 2004, a new exclusionary rule for concrete batch that excludes from Title V permitting requirements such facilities that operate below a specified annual production rate; 15A NCAC 02Q .0901 entitled ``Purpose and Scope'' effective January 1, 2005, a new exclusionary rule which provides for exclusions from construction and operating permits for certain types of sources and activities; and 15A NCAC 02Q .0902 entitled ``Portable Crushers'' effective January 1, 2005, an exclusionary rule which provides for exclusions from construction and operating permits for portable crusher operations. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through https://www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 4 office (please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more information). III. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve North Carolina's March 1, 2016, submission and a portion of the December 14, 2004, submission. The changes pertain to the addition of two new rules under a new section ``Permit Exemptions'' and adds a new rule to the ``Exclusionary Rules'' of the North Carolina SIP. These rule adoptions do not contravene federal permitting requirements or existing EPA policy, nor will they impact the NAAQS or interfere with any other applicable requirement of the Act. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(l). IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, these proposed action:Are not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); do not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); are certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); [[Page 31741]] do not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); are not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); are not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: June 26, 2017. V. Anne Heard, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 2017-14397 Filed 7-7-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 130 / Monday, July 10, 2017 / Proposed Rules 31739
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); AGENCY Environmental Protection Agency,
• is certified as not having a Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
40 CFR Part 52 Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities [EPA–R04–OAR–2016–0362; FRL–9964–66– telephone number is (404) 562–9043.
Region 4] Mr. Lakeman can also be reached via
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
electronic mail at lakeman.sean@
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina epa.gov.
• does not contain any unfunded Miscellaneous Rules SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described AGENCY: Environmental Protection I. Analysis of the State Submittals
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Agency (EPA).
On December 14, 2004 and March 1,
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); ACTION: Proposed rule.
2016, the State of North Carolina,
• does not have Federalism SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection through NCDEQ, submitted revisions to
implications as specified in Executive Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve the North Carolina SIP. EPA is
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, several changes to the North Carolina proposing to approve the March 1, 2016,
1999); State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission which adds a new rule—
15A NCAC 02Q .0809 Concrete Batch
• is not an economically significant submitted by the State of North
Carolina, through the North Carolina Plants and a portion of the December 14,
regulatory action based on health or
Department of Environmental Quality 2004, submission which adds two new
safety risks subject to Executive Order
(NCDEQ), on December 14, 2004 and rules—15A NCAC 02Q .0901, Purpose
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); and Scope and .0902 Portable Crushers.
March 1, 2016. The March 1, 2016,
• is not a significant regulatory action submission adds a new rule to the EPA has preliminarily determined that
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR ‘‘Exclusionary Rules’’ of the North these changes to the North Carolina SIP
28355, May 22, 2001); Carolina SIP, and the portion of the are approvable pursuant to section 110
• is not subject to requirements of December 14, 2004, submission EPA is of the CAA. The changes that are the
Section 12(d) of the National proposing to approve adds two new subject of this proposed rulemaking are
Technology Transfer and Advancement rules under a new section called described in further detail below.
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because ‘‘Permit Exemptions.’’ This action is A. March 1, 2016, SIP Submission
application of those requirements would being taken pursuant to the Clean Air
Act (CAA or Act). The March 1, 2016, submission adds
be inconsistent with the CAA; and a new exclusionary rule for concrete
• does not provide EPA with the DATES: Comments must be received on
batch plants (15A NCAC 02Q .0809
discretionary authority to address, as or before August 9, 2017. Concrete Batch Plants) that excludes
appropriate, disproportionate human ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, from Title V permitting requirements
health or environmental effects, using identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– such facilities that operate below a
practicable and legally permissible OAR–2016–0362 at https:// specified annual production rate. The
methods, under Executive Order 12898 www.regulations.gov. Follow the online production rate that qualifies concrete
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). instructions for submitting comments. batch plants for this permit exclusion is
Once submitted, comments cannot be 1,210,000 cubic yards of wet concrete
The SIP is not approved to apply on edited or removed from Regulations.gov. per year, which, based on an emission
any Indian reservation land or in any EPA may publish any comment received factor, corresponds to an emission rate
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe to its public docket. Do not submit below the major source threshold.
has demonstrated that a tribe has electronically any information you Subject facilities are required to submit
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian consider to be Confidential Business an annual registration to the appropriate
country, the rule does not have tribal Information (CBI) or other information regional office and report the quantity of
implications as specified by Executive whose disclosure is restricted by statute. wet concrete produced in the previous
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, Multimedia submissions (audio, video, calendar year and maintain records of
2000), nor will it impose substantial etc.) must be accompanied by a written annual production for the previous
direct costs on tribal governments or comment. The written comment is three calendar years. This annual
preempt tribal law. considered the official comment and certification that the facility’s
should include discussion of all points production rate is below the specified
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 you wish to make. EPA will generally level ensures continued protection of
Environmental protection, Air not consider comments or comment the NAAQS, specifically particulate
pollution control, Incorporation by contents located outside of the primary matter, which is of particular relevance
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or because concrete batch plants emit
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
other file sharing system). For particulate matter, including particulate
Nitrogen dioxide, Sulfur dioxide,
additional submission methods, the full matter with an aerodynamic diameter
Reporting, Volatile organic compounds, EPA public comment policy,
and Recordkeeping requirements. less than 10 micrometers (PM10) and
information about CBI or multimedia less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5). These
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. submissions, and general guidance on excluded sources must also make
Dated: June 26, 2017. making effective comments, please visit prompt reports if they exceed the
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ annual production rate limit, submitted
V. Anne Heard,
commenting-epa-dockets. within one week of the date on which
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the limit was exceeded.
[FR Doc. 2017–14399 Filed 7–7–17; 8:45 am]
Sean Lakeman, Air Regulatory The rule excludes from Title V
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Management Section, Air Planning and permitting requirements all concrete
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides batch plants in the state that produce
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:08 Jul 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM 10JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_31869/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 130 / Monday, July 10, 2017 / Proposed Rules 31741
• do not have Federalism Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on regulation of construction and
implications as specified in Executive October 4, 2016. EPA is proposing to modification of stationary sources,
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, approve the state’s Prevention of including a permit program as required
1999); Significant Deterioration (PSD) rules by part C of subsection I of the CAA—
• are not an economically significant which incorporate the Federal PSD rules Prevention of Significant Deterioration
regulatory action based on health or by reference. of Air Quality. Specific plan
safety risks subject to Executive Order DATES: Comments must be received on requirements for an approvable PSD SIP
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); or before August 9, 2017. are provided in sections 160–169 of the
• are not a significant regulatory ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, CAA and the implementing regulations
action subject to Executive Order 13211 identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– at 40 CFR 51.166. The Federal PSD
(66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); OAR–2016–0603 at http:// program is codified at 40 CFR 52.21.
• are not subject to requirements of www.regulations.gov, or via email to Minnesota does not have an approved
Section 12(d) of the National damico.genevieve@epa.gov. For PSD SIP at this time and has issued PSD
Technology Transfer and Advancement comments submitted at Regulations.gov, permits pursuant to a delegation of the
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because follow the online instructions for Federal PSD rules at 40 CFR 52.21.
application of those requirements would submitting comments. Once submitted,
be inconsistent with the CAA; and On October 4, 2016, MPCA submitted
comments cannot be edited or removed a request to revise the Minnesota SIP to
• do not provide EPA with the from Regulations.gov. For either manner
discretionary authority to address, as include Minn. R. 7007.3000, which
of submission, EPA may publish any incorporates 40 CFR 52.21 by reference.
appropriate, disproportionate human comment received to its public docket.
health or environmental effects, using MPCA provided further clarification
Do not submit electronically any with respect to program implementation
practicable and legally permissible information you consider to be
methods, under Executive Order 12898 in a letter dated June 1, 2017. MPCA
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). will not implement 40 CFR 52.21(g), (s),
or other information whose disclosure is
The SIP is not approved to apply on (t) and (u). The provisions at 40 CFR
restricted by statute. Multimedia
any Indian reservation land or in any 52.21(g), (s), (t) and (u) have no
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe corresponding requirements in 40 CFR
accompanied by a written comment.
has demonstrated that a tribe has 51.166. 40 CFR 52.21(g) contains
The written comment is considered the
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian procedures by which states may request
official comment and should include
country, the rule does not have tribal EPA redesignate areas to different air
discussion of all points you wish to
implications as specified by Executive quality classifications. The authority to
make. EPA will generally not consider
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, comments or comment contents located redesignate air quality classifications is
2000), nor will it impose substantial outside of the primary submission (i.e., an authority of the EPA Administrator.
direct costs on tribal governments or on the web, cloud, or other file sharing The June 1, 2017, letter clarifies that
preempt tribal law. system). For additional submission MPCA does not intend to implement
methods, please contact the person this paragraph and that the authority to
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 implement the paragraph remains with
identified in the FOR FURTHER
Environmental protection, Air INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
the EPA Administrator. 40 CFR 52.21(s)
pollution control, Incorporation by full EPA public comment policy, requires a Federal action associated
reference, Ozone, Particulate matter, information about CBI or multimedia with a PSD project to be coordinated
Reporting and recordkeeping submissions, and general guidance on with an associated Federal
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile making effective comments, please visit environmental impact statement. Once a
organic compounds. http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ PSD program has been approved into
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. commenting-epa-dockets. the SIP, PSD permits will be issued
under state authority and will no longer
Dated: June 26, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
be considered Federal actions. 40 CFR
V. Anne Heard, Rachel Rineheart, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air 52.21(t) describes the process to resolve
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. disputes over a redesignation or a
[FR Doc. 2017–14397 Filed 7–7–17; 8:45 am]
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, permit. This is an authority of the EPA
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Administrator. The June 1, 2017, letter
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–7017, clarifies that MPCA does not intend to
rineheart.rachel@epa.gov. implement this paragraph and that the
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION authority to implement the paragraph
AGENCY SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
remains with the EPA Administrator. 40
Throughout this document whenever
CFR 52.21(u) authorizes the
40 CFR Part 52 ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
Administrator to delegate the PSD
[EPA–R05–OAR–2016–0603; FRL–9964–62–
EPA. This supplementary information
program. The June 1, 2017, letter
Region 5] section is arranged as follows:
clarifies that MPCA does not intend to
I. Review of State Submittal implement this paragraph and that the
Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; II. Effects of Moving From Delegation to SIP authority to implement the paragraph
Prevention of Significant Deterioration Approved Program
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with PROPOSALS
III. What action is EPA taking?
remains with the EPA Administrator.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection IV. Incorporation by Reference Finally, as described in the June 1, 2017,
Agency (EPA). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews clarification letter, the requirements in
ACTION: Proposed rule. Minn. R. 7007.0700(B) for the
I. Review of State Submittal completeness review and Minn. R.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Section 110(a)(2)(C) of the Clean Air 7007.0850, subp. 2 for public notice
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a Act (CAA) requires that each SIP requirements, which have already been
revision to the Minnesota State include a program to provide for the approved into the SIP, will supersede
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:08 Jul 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM 10JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_31869/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-07-08 00:55:40
Document Modified: 2017-07-08 00:55:40
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before August 9, 2017. | |
| Contact | Sean Lakeman, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404) 562-9043. Mr. Lakeman can also be reached via electronic mail at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 31739 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR