82 FR 32301 - Approval and Promulgation of Plans for Designated Facilities; New Jersey; Delegation of Authority
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 133 (July 13, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 133 (July 13, 2017)
| Page Range | 32301-32303 | |
| FR Document | 2017-14744 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 133 (Thursday, July 13, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 32301-32303] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-14744] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 62 [EPA-R02-OAR-2017-0132, FRL-9962-42-Region 2] Approval and Promulgation of Plans for Designated Facilities; New Jersey; Delegation of Authority AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a request from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) for delegation of authority to implement and enforce the Federal plan for Sewage Sludge Incineration (SSI) units. On April 29, 2016 the EPA promulgated the Federal plan for SSI units to fulfill the requirements of sections 111(d)/129 of the Clean Air Act. The Federal plan addresses the implementation and enforcement of the emission guidelines applicable to existing SSI units located in areas not covered by an approved and currently effective state plan. The Federal plan imposes emission limits and other control requirements for existing affected SSI facilities which will reduce designated pollutants. On January 24, 2017, the NJDEP signed a Memorandum of Agreement which is intended to be the mechanism for the transfer of authority between the EPA and the NJDEP and defines the policies, responsibilities and procedures pursuant to the Federal plan for existing SSI units. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 14, 2017. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA- R02-OAR-2017-0132 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony (Ted) Gardella, Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866, at (212) [[Page 32302]] 637-3892, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section is arranged as follows: Table of Contents I. What action is the EPA proposing? II. Why is the EPA proposing this action? III. What was submitted by the NJDEP and how did the EPA respond? IV. What are the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements? V. What guidance did the EPA use to evaluate the NJDEP's delegation request? VI. What is the EPA's conclusion? VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What action is the EPA proposing? The EPA is proposing to approve the NJDEP's request for delegation of authority to implement and enforce a Federal plan and to adhere to the terms and conditions prescribed in the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed between the EPA and the NJDEP, as further explained below. The NJDEP requested delegation of authority of the Federal plan for existing applicable Sewage Sludge Incineration (SSI) units constructed on or before October 14, 2010. See 40 CFR part 62, subpart LLL. The Federal plan was promulgated by the EPA to implement emission guidelines (see 40 CFR part 60, subpart MMMM) pursuant to sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The purpose of this delegation is to acknowledge the NJDEP's ability to implement a program and to transfer primary implementation and enforcement responsibility from the EPA to the NJDEP for existing applicable sources of SSI units. While the NJDEP is delegated the authority to implement and enforce the SSI Federal plan, nothing in the delegation agreement shall prohibit the EPA from enforcing the SSI Federal plan. II. Why is the EPA proposing this action? The EPA is proposing this action to:Give the public the opportunity to submit comments on the EPA's proposed action, as discussed in the ADDRESSES section of this Notice; Fulfill a goal of the CAA to place state governments in positions of leadership for air pollution prevention and control; and Allow the NJDEP to implement and enforce a Federal plan promulgated by the EPA that implements emission guidelines pursuant to sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA. III. What was submitted by the NJDEP and how did the EPA respond? On October 12, 2016, the NJDEP submitted to the EPA a request for delegation of authority from the EPA to implement and enforce the Federal plan for existing SSI units. The EPA prepared the MOA that defines the policies, responsibilities, and procedures by which the Federal plan will be administered by both the NJDEP and the EPA, pursuant to 40 CFR part 62, subpart LLL for SSI units. The MOA is the mechanism for the transfer of responsibility from the EPA to the NJDEP. Both the EPA and the NJDEP signed the MOA in which the State agrees to the terms and conditions of the MOA and accepts responsibility to implement and enforce the policies, responsibilities and procedures of the SSI Federal plan. The transfer of authority to the NJDEP became effective upon signature by the NJDEP on January 24, 2017. IV. What are the CAA requirements? Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA require states to submit plans to control certain pollutants (designated pollutants) at existing solid waste combustor facilities and municipal solid waste landfills (designated facilities) whenever standards of performance have been established under section 111(b) for new sources of the same type and the EPA has established emission guidelines (EG) for such existing sources. A designated pollutant is any pollutant for which no air quality criteria has been issued or which is not included on a list published under section 108(a) (national ambient air quality standards) or section 112 (hazardous air pollutants) of the CAA, but emissions of which would be subject to a standard of performance for new stationary sources under section 111(b). In addition, section 129 of the CAA also requires the EPA to promulgate EG for solid waste incineration units that emit specific air pollutants or a mixture of air pollutants. These pollutants include organics (dioxins and dibenzofurans), carbon monoxide, metals (cadmium, lead and mercury), acid gases (hydrogen chloride, sulfur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen), particulate matter and opacity (as appropriate). On March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15372), the EPA promulgated NSPS and EG for SSI units, 40 CFR part 60, subparts LLLL and MMMM, respectively. The designated facility to which the EG applies is existing SSI units, as stipulated in subpart MMMM, that commenced construction on or before October 14, 2010. See 40 CFR 60.5060 for details. Pursuant to section 129 of the CAA, state plan requirements must be ``at least as protective'' as the EG and become federally enforceable upon approval by the EPA. The procedures for adoption and submittal of state plans are codified in 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. For states that fail to submit a plan, the EPA is required to develop and implement a Federal plan within two years following promulgation of the EG. The EPA implementation and enforcement of the Federal plan is viewed as an interim measure until states assume their role as the preferred implementers of the EG requirements stipulated in the Federal plan. Accordingly, the EPA encourages states to develop their own plan, or request delegation of the Federal plan, as the NJDEP has done. V. What guidance did the EPA use to evaluate the NJDEP's delegation request? The EPA evaluated the NJDEP's request for delegation of the SSI Federal plan pursuant to the provisions of the SSI Federal plan and the EPA's Delegation Manual.\1\ Section 62.15865 of the SSI Federal plan establishes that a state may meet its CAA section 111(d)/129 obligations by submitting an acceptable written request for delegation of the Federal plan that includes the following requirements: (1) A demonstration of adequate resources and legal authority to administer and enforce the Federal plan; (2) an inventory of affected SSI units, an inventory of emissions from affected SSI units, and provisions for state progress reports (see items under Sec. 60.5015(a)(1), (2) and (7) from the SSI EG); (3) certification that the hearing on the state delegation request, similar to the hearing for a state plan submittal, was held, a list of witnesses and their organizational affiliations, if any, appearing at the hearing, and a brief written summary of each presentation or written submission; and (4) a commitment to enter into a MOA with the Regional Administrator that sets forth the terms, conditions and effective date of the delegation and that serves as the mechanism for the transfer of authority. Under the EPA's Delegation Manual, item 7-139, the Regional Administrator is authorized to delegate implementation and enforcement of [[Page 32303]] sections 111(d)/129 Federal plans to state environmental agencies. The requirements and limitations of a delegation agreement are defined in item 7-139. The Regional Administrator may consider delegating authority to implement and enforce Federal plans to a state provided the following conditions are met: (1) The state does not already have an EPA approved State plan; and (2) items (1) and (4) as described above from section 62.15865 of the SSI Federal plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Section 7-139 of the EPA's Delegation Manual is entitled ``Implementation and Enforcement of 111(d)(2) and 111(d)/129(b)(3) Federal Plans'' and the reader may refer to it in the docket for this proposed rule at www.regulations.gov (see Docket ID Number EPA- R02-OAR-2017-0132. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NJDEP has met all of the EPA's delegation requirements as described above. The reader may view the NJDEP's letter to the EPA requesting delegation and the MOA signed by both parties at www.regulations.gov, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-R02-OAR-2017-0132. VI. What is the EPA's conclusion? The EPA has evaluated the NJDEP's submittal for consistency with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. The NJDEP has met all the requirements of the EPA's guidance for obtaining delegation of authority to implement and enforce the SSI Federal plan. The NJDEP entered into a MOA with the EPA and it became effective on January 24, 2017. Accordingly, the EPA proposes to approve the NJDEP's request dated October 12, 2016 for delegation of authority of the Federal plan for existing SSI units. The EPA will continue to retain certain specific authorities reserved to the EPA in the SSI Federal plan and as indicated in the MOA (e.g., authority to approve major alternatives to test methods or monitoring, etc.). VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a State plan submission that complies with the provisions of CAA sections 111(d) and 129(b)(2) and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7411(d) and 7429(b)(2); 40 CFR 62.02(a). Thus, in reviewing State plan submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed rulemaking action, pertaining to the NJDEP's section 111(d)/(129) request for delegation of authority to implement and enforce the Federal plan for existing SSI units, does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the NJDEP's section 111(d)/129 delegation request is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and the EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Administrative practice and procedure, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, waste treatment and disposal. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: April 28, 2017. Walter Mugdan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 2. [FR Doc. 2017-14744 Filed 7-12-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules 32301
BART,38 our proposed approval in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act ACTION: Proposed rule.
addressing BART for all other BART- of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
eligible EGUs 39 and this proposal to • Does not have Federalism SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
address SO2 and PM BART for the implications as specified in Executive Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
Nelson facility, we will have fulfilled all Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, request from the New Jersey Department
outstanding obligations with respect to 1999); of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) for
the Louisiana regional haze program for • Is not an economically significant delegation of authority to implement
the first planning period. regulatory action based on health or and enforce the Federal plan for Sewage
The EPA has made the preliminary safety risks subject to Executive Order Sludge Incineration (SSI) units. On
determination that the June 2017 SIP 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); April 29, 2016 the EPA promulgated the
revision requested by the State to be • Is not a significant regulatory action Federal plan for SSI units to fulfill the
parallel processed is in accordance with subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR requirements of sections 111(d)/129 of
the CAA and consistent with the CAA 28355, May 22, 2001); the Clean Air Act. The Federal plan
• Is not subject to requirements of addresses the implementation and
and the EPA’s policy and guidance.
section 12(d) of the National enforcement of the emission guidelines
Therefore, the EPA is proposing action
Technology Transfer and Advancement applicable to existing SSI units located
on the June 2017 SIP revision in parallel
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because in areas not covered by an approved and
with the State’s rulemaking process.
this action does not involve technical currently effective state plan. The
After the State completes its rulemaking
standards; and Federal plan imposes emission limits
process, adopts its final regulations, and • Does not provide EPA with the
submits these final adopted regulations and other control requirements for
discretionary authority to address, as
as a revision to the Louisiana SIP, the existing affected SSI facilities which
appropriate, disproportionate human
EPA will prepare a final action. If will reduce designated pollutants.
health or environmental effects, using
changes are made to the State’s practicable and legally permissible On January 24, 2017, the NJDEP
proposed rule after the EPA’s notice of methods, under Executive Order 12898 signed a Memorandum of Agreement
proposed rulemaking, such changes (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). which is intended to be the mechanism
must be acknowledged in the EPA’s In addition, the SIP is not approved for the transfer of authority between the
final rulemaking action. If the changes to apply on any Indian reservation land EPA and the NJDEP and defines the
are significant, then the EPA may be or in any other area where EPA or an policies, responsibilities and procedures
obligated to withdraw our initial Indian tribe has demonstrated that a pursuant to the Federal plan for existing
proposed action and re-propose. tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of SSI units.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Indian country, the proposed rule does DATES: Written comments must be
Reviews not have tribal implications and will not received on or before August 14, 2017.
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
Under the CAA, the Administrator is ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
governments or preempt tribal law as
required to approve a SIP submission identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
that complies with the provisions of the R02–OAR–2017–0132 at http://
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Act and applicable Federal regulations. www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 instructions for submitting comments.
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the Environmental protection, Air Once submitted, comments cannot be
EPA’s role is to approve state choices, pollution control, Incorporation by edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
provided that they meet the criteria of reference, Intergovernmental relations, The EPA may publish any comment
the CAA. Accordingly, this action Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate received to its public docket. Do not
merely proposes to approve state law as matter, Reporting and recordkeeping submit electronically any information
meeting Federal requirements and does requirements, Sulfur dioxides, you consider to be Confidential
not impose additional requirements Visibility, Interstate transport of Business Information (CBI) or other
beyond those imposed by state law. For pollution, Regional haze, Best available information whose disclosure is
that reason, this action: control technology. restricted by statute. Multimedia
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
action’’ subject to review by the Office accompanied by a written comment.
of Management and Budget under Dated: June 23, 2017. The written comment is considered the
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, Samuel Coleman, official comment and should include
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. discussion of all points you wish to
January 21, 2011); [FR Doc. 2017–14693 Filed 7–12–17; 8:45 am] make. The EPA will generally not
• Does not impose an information BILLING CODE 6560–50–P consider comments or comment
collection burden under the provisions contents located outside of the primary
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION other file sharing system). For
• Is certified as not having a AGENCY additional submission methods, the full
significant economic impact on a EPA public comment policy,
40 CFR Part 62 information about CBI or multimedia
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 [EPA–R02–OAR–2017–0132, FRL–9962–42– submissions, and general guidance on
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Region 2] making effective comments, please visit
• Does not contain any unfunded http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
Approval and Promulgation of Plans commenting-epa-dockets.
mandate or significantly or uniquely
for Designated Facilities; New Jersey;
affect small governments, as described FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Delegation of Authority
Anthony (Ted) Gardella, Environmental
38 81 FR 74750 (October 27, 2016). AGENCY: Environmental Protection Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New
39 82 FR 22936 (May 19, 2017). Agency. York, New York 10007–1866, at (212)
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:37 Jul 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM 13JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_32434/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules 32303
sections 111(d)/129 Federal plans to of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
state environmental agencies. The U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); AGENCY
requirements and limitations of a • is certified as not having a
delegation agreement are defined in significant economic impact on a 40 CFR Part 271
item 7–139. The Regional Administrator substantial number of small entities [EPA–R06–RCRA–2016–0344; FRL–9962–
may consider delegating authority to under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 38–Region 6 ]
implement and enforce Federal plans to U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
a state provided the following Oklahoma: Final Authorization of State
conditions are met: (1) The state does • does not contain any unfunded Hazardous Waste Management
not already have an EPA approved State mandate or significantly or uniquely Program Revisions
plan; and (2) items (1) and (4) as affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act AGENCY: Environmental Protection
described above from section 62.15865
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Agency (EPA).
of the SSI Federal plan.
• does not have Federalism ACTION: Proposed rule.
NJDEP has met all of the EPA’s
delegation requirements as described implications as specified in Executive SUMMARY: The State of Oklahoma has
above. The reader may view the NJDEP’s Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, applied to Environmental Protection
letter to the EPA requesting delegation 1999); Agency (EPA) for Final authorization of
and the MOA signed by both parties at • is not an economically significant the changes to its hazardous waste
www.regulations.gov, identified by regulatory action based on health or program under the Resource
Docket ID Number EPA–R02–OAR– safety risks subject to Executive Order Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
2017–0132. 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); EPA proposes to grant Final
VI. What is the EPA’s conclusion? • is not a significant regulatory action authorization to the State of Oklahoma.
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section
The EPA has evaluated the NJDEP’s of this Federal Register, EPA is
28355, May 22, 2001);
submittal for consistency with the CAA, authorizing the changes by an
EPA regulations, and EPA policy. The • is not subject to requirements of immediate final rule. EPA did not make
NJDEP has met all the requirements of Section 12(d) of the National a proposal prior to the direct final rule
the EPA’s guidance for obtaining Technology Transfer and Advancement because we believe this action is not
delegation of authority to implement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because controversial and do not expect
and enforce the SSI Federal plan. The application of those requirements would comments that oppose it. We have
NJDEP entered into a MOA with the be inconsistent with the CAA; and explained the reasons for this
EPA and it became effective on January • does not provide the EPA with the authorization in the preamble to the
24, 2017. Accordingly, the EPA discretionary authority to address, as direct final rule. Unless we get written
proposes to approve the NJDEP’s request appropriate, disproportionate human comments which oppose this
dated October 12, 2016 for delegation of health or environmental effects, using authorization during the comment
authority of the Federal plan for existing practicable and legally permissible period, the direct final rule will become
SSI units. The EPA will continue to methods, under Executive Order 12898 effective 60 days after publication and
retain certain specific authorities (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). we will not take further action on this
reserved to the EPA in the SSI Federal proposal. If we receive comments that
plan and as indicated in the MOA (e.g., In addition, this proposed rulemaking
oppose this action, we will withdraw
authority to approve major alternatives action, pertaining to the NJDEP’s section
the direct final rule and it will not take
to test methods or monitoring, etc.). 111(d)/(129) request for delegation of
effect. We will then respond to public
authority to implement and enforce the
VII. Statutory and Executive Order comments in a later final rule based on
Federal plan for existing SSI units, does
Reviews this proposal. You may not have another
not have tribal implications as specified
opportunity for comment. If you want to
Under the CAA, the Administrator is by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
comment on this action, you must do so
required to approve a State plan November 9, 2000), because the NJDEP’s
at this time.
submission that complies with the section 111(d)/129 delegation request is
not approved to apply in Indian country DATES: Send your written comments by
provisions of CAA sections 111(d) and August 14, 2017.
129(b)(2) and applicable Federal located in the state, and the EPA notes
that it will not impose substantial direct ADDRESSES: Submit any comments
regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7411(d) and
costs on tribal governments or preempt identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06–
7429(b)(2); 40 CFR 62.02(a). Thus, in
tribal law. RCRA–2016–0344 by one of the
reviewing State plan submissions, the
following methods:
EPA’s role is to approve state choices, List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
provided that they meet the criteria of www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
the CAA. Accordingly, this action Environmental protection, Air instructions for submitting comments.
merely proposes to approve state law as pollution control, Administrative 2. Email: patterson.alima@epa.gov.
meeting Federal requirements and does practice and procedure, 3. Mail: Alima Patterson, Regional
not impose additional requirements Intergovernmental relations, Reporting Authorization Coordinator, Permit
beyond those imposed by state law. For and recordkeeping requirements, waste
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section (6MM–RP), Multimedia
that reason, this proposed action: treatment and disposal. Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas Texas
action’’ subject to review by the Office 75202–2733.
Dated: April 28, 2017.
of Management and Budget under 4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Walter Mugdan, your comments to Alima Patterson,
October 4, 1993); Acting Regional Administrator, Region 2. Regional Authorization Coordinator,
• does not impose an information [FR Doc. 2017–14744 Filed 7–12–17; 8:45 am] Permit Section (6MM–RP), Multimedia
collection burden under the provisions BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:37 Jul 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM 13JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_32434/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-07-13 01:00:46
Document Modified: 2017-07-13 01:00:46
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before August 14, 2017. | |
| Contact | Anthony (Ted) Gardella, Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866, at (212) 637-3892, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 32301 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Intergovernmental Relations; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Waste Treatment and Disposal |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR