82_FR_32499 82 FR 32366 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request

82 FR 32366 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 133 (July 13, 2017)

Page Range32366-32368
FR Document2017-14703

This notice announces the intention of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed changes to the currently approved information collection project: ``Developing a Registry of Registries.'' In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, AHRQ invites the public to comment on this proposed information collection. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register on April 28, 2017, and allowed 60 days for public comment. AHRQ did not receive any substantive comments. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 133 (Thursday, July 13, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 133 (Thursday, July 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32366-32368]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14703]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


 Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the intention of the Agency for 
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed changes to the 
currently approved information collection project: ``Developing a 
Registry of Registries.''
    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, AHRQ invites the 
public to comment on this proposed information collection. This 
proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal 
Register on April 28, 2017, and allowed 60 days for public comment. 
AHRQ did not receive any substantive comments. The purpose of this 
notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment.

DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by August 14, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: AHRQ's OMB Desk 
Officer by fax at (202) 395-6974 (attention: AHRQ's desk officer) or by 
email at OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov (attention: AHRQ's desk officer).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports 
Clearance Officer, (301) 427-1477, or by email at 
doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Proposed Revision of a Currently Approved Collection Project: 
``Developing a Registry of Registries.''
    OMB Control Number: 0935-0203.
    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521, AHRQ is extending the comment period for this this proposed 
information collection on the development of a registry of patient 
registries. Patient registries have received significant attention and 
funding in recent years. Similar to controlled studies, patient 
registries represent some burden to patients (e.g., time to complete 
patient reported outcome measures, risk of loss of privacy), who often 
participate voluntarily in hopes of improving knowledge about a disease 
or condition. Patient registries also represent a substantial 
investment of health research resources. Despite these factors, patient 
registries are not required to be registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 
presenting the potential for duplication of efforts and insufficient 
dissemination of findings that are not published in the peer-reviewed 
literature. To fulfill the obligation to patients and to ensure that 
resources are used in the most efficient manner, registries need to be 
listed in a manner similar to that of trials in ClinicalTrials.gov.
    By providing a centralized point of collection for information 
about all patient registries in the United States, the Registry of 
Patient Registries (RoPR) enhances patient registry information, 
extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov, building on AHRQ's efforts to 
describe the quality, appropriateness, and effectiveness of health 
services (and

[[Page 32367]]

patient registries in particular) in a more readily available, central 
location.
    The RoPR database system aims to achieve the following objectives:
    (1) Provide a searchable database of patient registries in the 
United States (to promote collaboration, reduce redundancy, and improve 
transparency);
    (2) Facilitate the use of common data fields and definitions in 
similar health conditions (to improve opportunities for sharing, 
comparing, and linkage);
    (3) Provide a public repository of searchable summary results 
(including results from registries that have not yet been published in 
the peer-reviewed literature);
    (4) Offer a search tool to locate existing data that researchers 
can request for use in new studies; and
    (5) Serve as a recruitment tool for researchers and patients 
interested in participating in patient registries.
    To achieve the objectives of this project, the following data 
collections will be implemented:
    (1) Collect information on registries from users who populate the 
RoPR database system.
    AHRQ is proposing to add a self-registration option to the RoPR 
database so that registry owners do not need a National Library of 
Medicine Protocol Registration System (PRS) account to contribute. The 
current OMB-approved RoPR system requires users to have a PRS account. 
In the current data entry process, registry owners enter most of the 
registry information using the ClinicalTrials.gov PRS. If a user 
defines the ClinicalTrials.gov record as a patient registry, that user 
will have the option of following a link to the RoPR submission page to 
input additional information about the registry. Patient registry data 
entered in the PRS is uploaded to the RoPR system daily and is 
accessible (along with information entered directly into RoPR) to the 
public via the RoPR search function. Under the AHRQ proposal, these 
users could complete a simple registration on the RoPR site, which 
would be less burdensome than the PRS registration process, and then 
enter all registry information directly on RoPR. The rationale behind 
this alternative registration pathway is that many registries are 
created for quality reporting, outcome tracking, and quality 
improvement purposes, rather than for research purposes. Registering in 
ClinicalTrials.gov implies a research purpose, so it is not necessarily 
appropriate for non-research registries to register in 
ClinicalTrials.gov, and many have expressed that they do not wish to do 
so. AHRQ anticipates that more than 75 percent of registries would 
still register through the ClinicalTrials.com. However, the remaining 
registries are extremely important for health policy, and providing 
them with a registration pathway furthers the goal of creating a 
central place where stakeholders can find information on research and 
non-research registries pertinent to a specific clinical topic.
    The new self-registration pathway is being developed by AHRQ 
through its contractor, L&M Policy Research and subcontractor Truven 
Health Analytics, an IBM Company, pursuant to AHRQ's statutory 
authority to conduct and support research on health care and on systems 
for the delivery of such care, including activities with respect to the 
quality, effectiveness, efficiency, appropriateness and value of health 
care services and with respect to database development. 42 U.S.C. 
299a(a)(1) and (8).
    AHRQ, in collaboration with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 
Services (CMS), is also proposing to add three fields to the self-
registration pathway related to the CMS initiative to create a 
Centralized Repository for Public Health Agencies and Clinical Data 
Registry Reporting. The purpose of the repository is to assist eligible 
professionals, eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals in 
finding entities that accept electronic public health data. By adding 
these fields to the existing RoPR database, AHRQ will further the goal 
of creating a central place where stakeholders can find all pertinent 
information on registries.

Method of Collection

    The purpose and the use of the RoPR is to provide a readily 
available public resource strictly for patient registries, following 
the model of ClinicalTrials.gov, allowing for the increased 
availability and efficacy of patient registries. The information being 
collected in the RoPR Record is visible to the public visiting the RoPR 
Web site, and is readily available for public use.
    The RoPR is an ongoing data collection initiative.

Estimated Annual Respondent Burden

    Exhibit 1 shows the estimated annualized burden hours for the 
respondent's time to participate in the RoPR. In 2016, 65 respondents 
manually entered a new RoPR record. It is expected that more than 75% 
of patient registries are research-focused and will continue to use the 
original ClinicalTrials.gov pathway described above. Thus, it is 
estimated that once the self-registration pathway is available, 
approximately 65 respondents will enter RoPR records through the 
ClinicalTrials.gov link annually, and an additional 16 respondents 
(roughly 25% of 65), representing non-research registries, will enter 
RoPR records through the new self-registration pathway.
    Each respondent would to need enter his or her new RoPR record only 
once. The RoPR system sends an automated reminder to any registry owner 
who has not updated his or her RoPR record in the past year. In 2016, 
132 RoPR entries were updated and released. Using the same logic as 
above, it is estimated that an additional 33 entries (25% of 132) might 
be updated annually once the self-registration pathway is available.
    In January 2017, Truven Health Analytics used a sample of existing 
ClinicalTrials.gov registry entries to estimate the time needed to 
enter all additional fields added through the self-registration 
process. The sample included records representing a range of depth and 
complexity. For example, one registry record contained only one primary 
outcome measure. Another record contained three more detailed outcome 
measures (one primary, one secondary, and one other.)
    As a result of the knowledge gained during these processes, it is 
estimated that it will take users 10 minutes, on average, to manually 
enter the additional fields added through the self-registration 
process. Adding this time to the estimated burden of completing the 
original RoPR fields (45 minutes), it is estimated that it will take 
users 55 minutes to complete all fields through the self-registration 
pathway.
    It is estimated that it will take users 5 minutes to review and 
update the fields added through the self-registration pathway. Adding 
this time to the estimated burden of reviewing and updating the 
original RoPR fields (15 minutes), it is estimated that it will take 20 
minutes for a person to review and make updates to an existing RoPR 
record created through the self-registration pathway.

[[Page 32368]]



                                  Exhibit 1--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of
                    Form name                        Number of     responses per    Minutes per    Total burden
                                                    respondents     respondent       response          hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New RoPR Record entered manually through self-                16               1           55/60           14.67
 registration process...........................
New RoPR Record entered through                               65               1           45/60           48.75
 ClinicalTrials.gov pathway.....................
Review/update existing RoPR Record created                    33               1           20/60              11
 through self-registration process..............
Review/update existing RoPR Record created                   132               1           15/60              33
 through ClinicalTrials.gov pathway.............
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................             246  ..............  ..............          107.42
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Exhibit 2 shows the estimated cost burden associated with the 
respondent's time to participate in the RoPR. The total cost burden to 
respondents is estimated at an average of $4,017.51 annually.

                                   Exhibit 2--Estimated Annualized Cost Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                  Average hourly
                    Form name                        Number of     Total burden      wage rate      Total cost
                                                    respondents        hours         [dagger]         burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New RoPR Record entered manually through self-                16           14.67          $37.40         $548.66
 registration process...........................
New RoPR Record entered through                               65           48.75           37.40        1,823.25
 ClinicalTrials.gov pathway.....................
Review/update existing RoPR Record created                    33              11           37.40          411.40
 through self-registration process..............
Review/update existing RoPR Record created                   132              33           37.40        1,234.20
 through ClinicalTrials.gov pathway.............
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................             246          107.42           37.40        4,017.51
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[dagger] Based on the mean wages for Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations, 29-0000. National
  Compensation Survey: Occupational wages in the United States May 2015, ``U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of
  Labor Statistics.'' Available at: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes290000.htm.

Request for Comments

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on AHRQ's 
information collection are requested with regard to any of the 
following: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of AHRQ health care research and 
health care information dissemination functions, including whether the 
information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ's 
estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed 
collection(s) of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, 
and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information upon the 
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology.
    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and included in the Agency's subsequent request for OMB approval of the 
proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of 
public record.

Sharon B. Arnold,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 2017-14703 Filed 7-12-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4160-90-P



                                                32366                                 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2017 / Notices

                                                in this draft FPL is intended to enable                               Council looks forward to hearing from
                                                the Council to most effectively meet                                  the public on this proposal.
                                                these fundamental commitments. The

                                                                                                    APPENDIX A—COUNCIL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITMENTS
                                                                  Topic                                                                                  Commitment                                                                  Page No.

                                                Development of Funded Priority                    Take a holistic approach to restoration ........................................................................................        13, 14
                                                  Lists.                                          Continue to improve Submission Guidelines ...............................................................................                   17
                                                                                                  The Council adopted the watershed/estuary-based approach as a strategic planning principle                                                  22
                                                                                                    for future FPL development.
                                                                                                  Healthy and sustainable ecosystems are essential for thriving and resilient coastal commu-                                                    23
                                                                                                    nities.
                                                                                                  Encourage partnerships and additional public and private financial and technical support to                                                   23
                                                                                                    maximize outcomes and impacts.
                                                                                                  Identify and leverage new sources of funding to support current and future restoration work                                                   25
                                                                                                    by exploring creative conservation funding.
                                                                                                  The Council will refine its processes for considering public input on draft FPLs before final-                                                25
                                                                                                    izing changes to the final FPL.
                                                                                                  Project evaluation and selection will be conducted in the most open manner feasible ..............                                            25
                                                                                                  Will update and improve the process for applying BAS to FPL proposals, including exploring                                                    27
                                                                                                    the use of one or more science review panels.
                                                Collaboration and Coordination                    Sponsor and participate in meetings and workshops in 2017 and into 2018 .............................                                         17
                                                                                                  Facilitate meaningful engagement with range of stakeholders ...................................................                               17
                                                                                                  Maximize outcomes by leveraging funds and expertise ..............................................................                            17
                                                                                                  Coordination and collaboration among members and our restoration partners is critical to the                                                  24
                                                                                                    success of Gulf restoration.
                                                                                                  Coordinate regulatory efforts across Council membership ..........................................................                          26
                                                Science .....................................     Decisions made pursuant to the FPL will be based on the best available science ....................                                  6, 17, 27
                                                                                                  The Council recognizes the importance of measuring outcomes and impacts in order to                                                         27
                                                                                                    achieve tangible results and ensure that funds are invested in a meaningful way.



                                                  Document Availability: Copies of the                                Budget (OMB) approve the proposed                                  for this this proposed information
                                                draft CPS FPL are available at the                                    changes to the currently approved                                  collection on the development of a
                                                following office during regular business                              information collection project:                                    registry of patient registries. Patient
                                                hours: Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration                               ‘‘Developing a Registry of Registries.’’                           registries have received significant
                                                Council, Hale Boggs Federal Building,                                    In accordance with the Paperwork                                attention and funding in recent years.
                                                500 Poydras Street, Suite 1117, New                                   Reduction Act, AHRQ invites the public                             Similar to controlled studies, patient
                                                Orleans, LA 70130. The draft CPS FPL                                  to comment on this proposed                                        registries represent some burden to
                                                can also be viewed and downloaded at                                  information collection. This proposed                              patients (e.g., time to complete patient
                                                www.restorethegulf.gov.                                               information collection was previously                              reported outcome measures, risk of loss
                                                  Legal Authority: The statutory program                              published in the Federal Register on                               of privacy), who often participate
                                                authority for the draft FPL is found at 33                            April 28, 2017, and allowed 60 days for                            voluntarily in hopes of improving
                                                U.S.C. 1321(t)(2).                                                    public comment. AHRQ did not receive                               knowledge about a disease or condition.
                                                                                                                      any substantive comments. The purpose                              Patient registries also represent a
                                                Will D. Spoon,                                                        of this notice is to allow an additional                           substantial investment of health
                                                Program Analyst, Gulf Coast Ecosystem                                 30 days for public comment.
                                                Restoration Council.                                                                                                                     research resources. Despite these
                                                                                                                      DATES: Comments on this notice must be                             factors, patient registries are not
                                                [FR Doc. 2017–14690 Filed 7–12–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                      received by August 14, 2017.                                       required to be registered in
                                                BILLING CODE 6560–58–P
                                                                                                                      ADDRESSES: Written comments should                                 ClinicalTrials.gov, presenting the
                                                                                                                      be submitted to: AHRQ’s OMB Desk                                   potential for duplication of efforts and
                                                                                                                      Officer by fax at (202) 395–6974                                   insufficient dissemination of findings
                                                DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND                                              (attention: AHRQ’s desk officer) or by                             that are not published in the peer-
                                                HUMAN SERVICES                                                        email at OIRA_submission@                                          reviewed literature. To fulfill the
                                                Agency for Healthcare Research and                                    omb.eop.gov (attention: AHRQ’s desk                                obligation to patients and to ensure that
                                                Quality                                                               officer).                                                          resources are used in the most efficient
                                                                                                                      FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                                   manner, registries need to be listed in a
                                                Agency Information Collection                                         Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports                                      manner similar to that of trials in
                                                Activities: Proposed Collection;                                      Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by                           ClinicalTrials.gov.
                                                Comment Request                                                       email at doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.                                By providing a centralized point of
                                                                                                                                                                                         collection for information about all
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                and Quality, HHS.                                                        Proposed Revision of a Currently                                patient registries in the United States,
                                                ACTION: Notice.                                                       Approved Collection Project:                                       the Registry of Patient Registries (RoPR)
                                                                                                                      ‘‘Developing a Registry of Registries.’’                           enhances patient registry information,
                                                SUMMARY:   This notice announces the                                     OMB Control Number: 0935–0203.                                  extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov,
                                                intention of the Agency for Healthcare                                   In accordance with the Paperwork                                building on AHRQ’s efforts to describe
                                                Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request                                Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521,                                the quality, appropriateness, and
                                                that the Office of Management and                                     AHRQ is extending the comment period                               effectiveness of health services (and


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014       17:41 Jul 12, 2017         Jkt 241001   PO 00000      Frm 00051      Fmt 4703     Sfmt 4703     E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM          13JYN1


                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2017 / Notices                                           32367

                                                patient registries in particular) in a more              purpose, so it is not necessarily                     respondent’s time to participate in the
                                                readily available, central location.                     appropriate for non-research registries               RoPR. In 2016, 65 respondents manually
                                                   The RoPR database system aims to                      to register in ClinicalTrials.gov, and                entered a new RoPR record. It is
                                                achieve the following objectives:                        many have expressed that they do not                  expected that more than 75% of patient
                                                   (1) Provide a searchable database of                  wish to do so. AHRQ anticipates that                  registries are research-focused and will
                                                patient registries in the United States (to              more than 75 percent of registries would              continue to use the original
                                                promote collaboration, reduce                            still register through the                            ClinicalTrials.gov pathway described
                                                redundancy, and improve                                  ClinicalTrials.com. However, the                      above. Thus, it is estimated that once
                                                transparency);                                           remaining registries are extremely                    the self-registration pathway is
                                                   (2) Facilitate the use of common data                 important for health policy, and                      available, approximately 65 respondents
                                                fields and definitions in similar health                 providing them with a registration                    will enter RoPR records through the
                                                conditions (to improve opportunities for                 pathway furthers the goal of creating a               ClinicalTrials.gov link annually, and an
                                                sharing, comparing, and linkage);                        central place where stakeholders can                  additional 16 respondents (roughly 25%
                                                   (3) Provide a public repository of                    find information on research and non-                 of 65), representing non-research
                                                searchable summary results (including                    research registries pertinent to a specific           registries, will enter RoPR records
                                                results from registries that have not yet                clinical topic.                                       through the new self-registration
                                                been published in the peer-reviewed                         The new self-registration pathway is               pathway.
                                                literature);                                             being developed by AHRQ through its
                                                                                                                                                                  Each respondent would to need enter
                                                   (4) Offer a search tool to locate                     contractor, L&M Policy Research and
                                                                                                                                                               his or her new RoPR record only once.
                                                existing data that researchers can                       subcontractor Truven Health Analytics,
                                                                                                                                                               The RoPR system sends an automated
                                                request for use in new studies; and                      an IBM Company, pursuant to AHRQ’s
                                                                                                                                                               reminder to any registry owner who has
                                                   (5) Serve as a recruitment tool for                   statutory authority to conduct and
                                                                                                                                                               not updated his or her RoPR record in
                                                researchers and patients interested in                   support research on health care and on
                                                                                                                                                               the past year. In 2016, 132 RoPR entries
                                                participating in patient registries.                     systems for the delivery of such care,
                                                                                                                                                               were updated and released. Using the
                                                   To achieve the objectives of this                     including activities with respect to the
                                                                                                         quality, effectiveness, efficiency,                   same logic as above, it is estimated that
                                                project, the following data collections                                                                        an additional 33 entries (25% of 132)
                                                will be implemented:                                     appropriateness and value of health care
                                                                                                         services and with respect to database                 might be updated annually once the
                                                   (1) Collect information on registries                                                                       self-registration pathway is available.
                                                from users who populate the RoPR                         development. 42 U.S.C. 299a(a)(1) and
                                                                                                         (8).                                                     In January 2017, Truven Health
                                                database system.
                                                                                                            AHRQ, in collaboration with the                    Analytics used a sample of existing
                                                   AHRQ is proposing to add a self-
                                                                                                         Centers for Medicare & Medicaid                       ClinicalTrials.gov registry entries to
                                                registration option to the RoPR database
                                                                                                         Services (CMS), is also proposing to add              estimate the time needed to enter all
                                                so that registry owners do not need a
                                                                                                         three fields to the self-registration                 additional fields added through the self-
                                                National Library of Medicine Protocol
                                                                                                         pathway related to the CMS initiative to              registration process. The sample
                                                Registration System (PRS) account to
                                                                                                         create a Centralized Repository for                   included records representing a range of
                                                contribute. The current OMB-approved
                                                                                                         Public Health Agencies and Clinical                   depth and complexity. For example, one
                                                RoPR system requires users to have a
                                                                                                         Data Registry Reporting. The purpose of               registry record contained only one
                                                PRS account. In the current data entry
                                                                                                         the repository is to assist eligible                  primary outcome measure. Another
                                                process, registry owners enter most of
                                                                                                         professionals, eligible hospitals, and                record contained three more detailed
                                                the registry information using the
                                                                                                         critical access hospitals in finding                  outcome measures (one primary, one
                                                ClinicalTrials.gov PRS. If a user defines
                                                                                                         entities that accept electronic public                secondary, and one other.)
                                                the ClinicalTrials.gov record as a patient
                                                                                                         health data. By adding these fields to                   As a result of the knowledge gained
                                                registry, that user will have the option
                                                                                                         the existing RoPR database, AHRQ will                 during these processes, it is estimated
                                                of following a link to the RoPR
                                                                                                         further the goal of creating a central                that it will take users 10 minutes, on
                                                submission page to input additional
                                                                                                         place where stakeholders can find all                 average, to manually enter the
                                                information about the registry. Patient
                                                                                                         pertinent information on registries.                  additional fields added through the self-
                                                registry data entered in the PRS is
                                                uploaded to the RoPR system daily and                    Method of Collection                                  registration process. Adding this time to
                                                is accessible (along with information                                                                          the estimated burden of completing the
                                                                                                            The purpose and the use of the RoPR
                                                entered directly into RoPR) to the public                                                                      original RoPR fields (45 minutes), it is
                                                                                                         is to provide a readily available public
                                                via the RoPR search function. Under the                                                                        estimated that it will take users 55
                                                                                                         resource strictly for patient registries,
                                                AHRQ proposal, these users could                                                                               minutes to complete all fields through
                                                                                                         following the model of
                                                complete a simple registration on the                                                                          the self-registration pathway.
                                                                                                         ClinicalTrials.gov, allowing for the
                                                RoPR site, which would be less                           increased availability and efficacy of                   It is estimated that it will take users
                                                burdensome than the PRS registration                     patient registries. The information being             5 minutes to review and update the
                                                process, and then enter all registry                     collected in the RoPR Record is visible               fields added through the self-
                                                information directly on RoPR. The                        to the public visiting the RoPR Web site,             registration pathway. Adding this time
                                                rationale behind this alternative                        and is readily available for public use.              to the estimated burden of reviewing
                                                registration pathway is that many                           The RoPR is an ongoing data                        and updating the original RoPR fields
                                                registries are created for quality                       collection initiative.                                (15 minutes), it is estimated that it will
                                                reporting, outcome tracking, and quality                                                                       take 20 minutes for a person to review
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                improvement purposes, rather than for                    Estimated Annual Respondent Burden                    and make updates to an existing RoPR
                                                research purposes. Registering in                          Exhibit 1 shows the estimated                       record created through the self-
                                                ClinicalTrials.gov implies a research                    annualized burden hours for the                       registration pathway.




                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:41 Jul 12, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00052   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM   13JYN1


                                                32368                                     Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2017 / Notices

                                                                                                               EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
                                                                                                                                                                                           Number of
                                                                                                                                                                          Number of                                   Minutes per              Total burden
                                                                                                  Form name                                                                              responses per
                                                                                                                                                                         respondents                                   response                   hours
                                                                                                                                                                                           respondent

                                                New RoPR Record entered manually through self-registration process ........                                                         16                        1                   55/60               14.67
                                                New RoPR Record entered through ClinicalTrials.gov pathway .....................                                                    65                        1                   45/60               48.75
                                                Review/update existing RoPR Record created through self-registration proc-
                                                  ess ................................................................................................................              33                         1                  20/60                      11
                                                Review/update existing RoPR Record created through ClinicalTrials.gov
                                                  pathway ........................................................................................................                132                         1                    15/60                     33

                                                      Total ..........................................................................................................            246    ........................   ........................         107.42



                                                  Exhibit 2 shows the estimated cost                                        time to participate in the RoPR. The                             estimated at an average of $4,017.51
                                                burden associated with the respondent’s                                     total cost burden to respondents is                              annually.

                                                                                                                 EXHIBIT 2—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST BURDEN
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Average
                                                                                                                                                                          Number of       Total burden                                          Total cost
                                                                                                  Form name                                                                                                           hourly wage
                                                                                                                                                                         respondents         hours                                               burden
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         rate †

                                                New RoPR Record entered manually through self-registration process ........                                                         16                  14.67                    $37.40            $548.66
                                                New RoPR Record entered through ClinicalTrials.gov pathway .....................                                                    65                  48.75                     37.40            1,823.25
                                                Review/update existing RoPR Record created through self-registration proc-
                                                  ess ................................................................................................................              33                       11                   37.40              411.40
                                                Review/update existing RoPR Record created through ClinicalTrials.gov
                                                  pathway ........................................................................................................                132                       33                    37.40            1,234.20

                                                      Total ..........................................................................................................            246                 107.42                       37.40           4,017.51
                                                  † Based on the mean wages for Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations, 29–0000. National Compensation Survey: Occupational
                                                wages in the United States May 2015, ‘‘U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.’’ Available at: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/
                                                oes290000.htm.


                                                Request for Comments                                                        comments will become a matter of                                 published and unpublished pertinent
                                                                                                                            public record.                                                   scientific information will improve the
                                                  In accordance with the Paperwork                                                                                                           quality of this review.
                                                Reduction Act, comments on AHRQ’s                                           Sharon B. Arnold,
                                                                                                                                                                                             DATES: Submission Deadline on or
                                                information collection are requested                                        Deputy Director.
                                                                                                                                                                                             before August 14, 2017.
                                                with regard to any of the following: (a)                                    [FR Doc. 2017–14703 Filed 7–12–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                                                             ADDRESSES:
                                                Whether the proposed collection of                                          BILLING CODE 4160–90–P
                                                                                                                                                                                               Email submissions: SEADS@epc-
                                                information is necessary for the proper                                                                                                      src.org.
                                                performance of AHRQ health care                                                                                                                Print submissions:
                                                                                                                            DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                                research and health care information                                                                                                           Mailing Address: Portland VA
                                                                                                                            HUMAN SERVICES
                                                dissemination functions, including                                                                                                           Research Foundation, Scientific
                                                whether the information will have                                           Agency for Healthcare Research and                               Resource Center, ATTN: Scientific
                                                practical utility; (b) the accuracy of                                      Quality                                                          Information Packet Coordinator, P.O.
                                                AHRQ’s estimate of burden (including                                                                                                         Box 69539, Portland, OR 97239.
                                                hours and costs) of the proposed                                            Supplemental Evidence and Data                                     Shipping Address (FedEx, UPS, etc.):
                                                collection(s) of information; (c) ways to                                   Request on Stroke Prevention in Atrial                           Portland VA Research Foundation,
                                                enhance the quality, utility, and clarity                                   Fibrillation Patients: A Systematic                              Scientific Resource Center, ATTN:
                                                of the information to be collected; and                                     Review Update                                                    Scientific Information Packet
                                                (d) ways to minimize the burden of the                                                                                                       Coordinator, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans
                                                                                                                            AGENCY:  Agency for Healthcare Research                          Hospital Road, Mail Code: R&D 71,
                                                collection of information upon the                                          and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.                                         Portland, OR 97239.
                                                respondents, including the use of                                           ACTION: Request for supplemental
                                                automated collection techniques or                                                                                                           FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                                            evidence and data submissions.                                   Ryan McKenna, Telephone: 503–220–
                                                other forms of information technology.
                                                                                                                            SUMMARY:    The Agency for Healthcare                            8262 ext. 51723 or Email: SEADS@epc-
                                                  Comments submitted in response to                                         Research and Quality (AHRQ) is seeking                           src.org.
                                                this notice will be summarized and                                          scientific information submissions from                          SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                included in the Agency’s subsequent                                         the public. Scientific information is                            Agency for Healthcare Research and
                                                request for OMB approval of the                                             being solicited to inform our review of                          Quality has commissioned the
                                                proposed information collection. All                                        Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation                         Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC)
                                                                                                                            Patients: A Systematic Review Update,                            Program to complete a review of the
                                                                                                                            which is currently being conducted by                            evidence for Stroke Prevention in Atrial
                                                                                                                            the AHRQ’s Evidence-based Practice                               Fibrillation Patients: A Systematic
                                                                                                                            Centers (EPC) Program. Access to                                 Review Update. AHRQ is conducting


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014         17:41 Jul 12, 2017        Jkt 241001       PO 00000        Frm 00053       Fmt 4703       Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM       13JYN1



Document Created: 2017-07-13 01:00:44
Document Modified: 2017-07-13 01:00:44
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
DatesComments on this notice must be received by August 14, 2017.
ContactDoris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer, (301) 427-1477, or by email at [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 32366 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR