82 FR 33014 - Air Plan Approval; ME; Consumer Products Alternative Control Plan
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 137 (July 19, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 137 (July 19, 2017)
| Page Range | 33014-33016 | |
| FR Document | 2017-15048 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 19, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 33014-33016] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-15048] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0023; A-1-FRL-9965-10-Region 1] Air Plan Approval; ME; Consumer Products Alternative Control Plan AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (Maine DEP). The SIP revision consists of an Alternative Control Plan (ACP) for the control of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from Reckitt Benckiser's Air Wick Air Freshener Single Phase Aerosol Spray, issued pursuant to Maine's consumer products rule. This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective September 18, 2017, unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 18, 2017. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01- OAR-2017-0023 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David L. Mackintosh, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail Code OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912, tel. 617-918-1584, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. Table of Contents I. Background and Purpose II. Description and Evaluation of the State's Submittal III. Final Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background and Purpose Maine's Chapter 152, ``Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer Products'' (Chapter 152) became effective in the State of Maine on September 1, 2004 and was approved by EPA into the Maine SIP on October 24, 2005 (70 FR 61382). Maine subsequently amended this rule. The current amended version of the rule became effective in the State of Maine on December 15, 2007 and was approved by EPA into the Maine SIP on May 22, 2012 (77 FR 30216). Chapter 152 contains VOC content limits for the manufacture and sale of various consumer products in the state of Maine. Chapter 152 also provides for state and EPA approval of ACPs by allowing the responsible party the option of voluntarily applying for such agreements. On March 30, 2012, the Maine DEP received an ACP application from Reckitt Benckiser LLC (Reckitt) for Reckitt's Air Wick Air Freshener Single-Phase Aerosol Spray pursuant to Chapter 152. The Maine DEP approved the Reckitt ACP effective April 23, 2013 and on the same day sent EPA the ACP for approval into the Maine SIP. II. Description and Evaluation of the State's Submittal Reckitt manufactures Air Wick Air Freshener Single-Phase Aerosol Spray (Product), which is offered for retail sale and wholesale distribution in the State of Maine. The Product contains 4.6% VOCs by weight. The Chapter 152 regulatory content limit for single-phase aerosol air freshener is 30% VOCs by weight. Reckitt's ACP generates VOC credits, expressed in pounds of VOCs, based on the difference between the Product VOC content and regulatory VOC limit for each unit sold in the State of Maine. Credits generated are subject to the conditions in the ACP Approval. Reckitt shall monitor Maine sales of the Product and each calendar quarter shall provide to the Maine DEP accurate records and documentation as a basis for compliance reporting. Only sales in the State of Maine that are substantiated by accurate documentation shall be used in the calculation of VOC emissions and emission reductions (surplus reductions). The resulting surplus reduction credits shall be discounted by 5% prior to the issuance [[Page 33015]] of the surplus emission reduction certificates by the Maine DEP. Reckitt must maintain a minimum of three years of detailed transactional data, traceable to invoice levels. Maine DEP shall issue surplus reduction certificates which establish and quantify to the nearest pound of VOC reduced, surplus reductions achieved by Reckitt operating under the ACP. Surplus reduction certificates shall not constitute instruments, securities, or any other form of property. The issuance, use and trading of all surplus reductions shall be subject to the conditions within the ACP. Any surplus reductions issued by Maine DEP may be used by Reckitt until the reductions expire, are traded to another responsible party operating under a SIP-approved ACP, or until the ACP is canceled. A valid surplus reduction shall be in effect starting five days after the date of issuance by the Maine DEP, for a continuous period of one year at the end of which period the surplus reduction shall then expire. Surplus reductions cannot be applied retroactively to any compliance period prior to the compliance period in which the reductions were generated. While valid, surplus reductions certificates can only be used in the State of Maine to: (1) Adjust either the Consumer Product ACP emissions of either Reckitt or another ACP responsible party to which the reductions were traded, provided the surplus reductions are not to be used by any ACP responsible party to lower its ACP emissions when its ACP emissions are equal to or less than the ACP limit during the applicable compliance period; or (2) be traded for the purpose of reconciling another approved Consumer Product ACP responsible party's shortfalls. EPA has reviewed the ACP and has determined that it is approvable. Reckitt must still, at a minimum, comply with the VOC content limits in Maine's SIP-approved Chapter 152. However, to the extent that the company documents, as outlined in the ACP, the sales of Product in Maine with a VOC content below these limits, the Maine DEP will issue VOC emission reduction credits that may be used in the future. Since to date, this is the first and only Consumer Product ACP submitted by the State of Maine for SIP approval, reduction certificates generated may only be held for future use until they expire (i.e., for one year). Certificates generated may only be used after a second Consumer Product ACP is submitted by Maine, and approved by EPA, into the Maine SIP. Thus, this SIP revision meets the anti-back sliding requirements of Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act. III. Final Action EPA is approving, and incorporating into the Maine SIP, an ACP for Reckitt Benckiser's Air Wick Air Freshener Single Phase Aerosol Spray. The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should relevant adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective September 18, 2017 without further notice unless the Agency receives relevant adverse comments by August 18, 2017. If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposed rule. All parties interested in commenting on the proposed rule should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on September 18, 2017 and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the alternative control plan issued by the Maine DEP to Reckitt described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov, and/or at the EPA Region 1 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have [[Page 33016]] tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. Section 804, however, exempts from section 801 the following types of rules: Rules of particular applicability; rules relating to agency management or personnel; and rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because this is a rule of particular applicability, EPA is not required to submit a rule report regarding this action under section 801. Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 18, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: July 5, 2017. Deborah A. Szaro, Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England. Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart U--Maine 0 2. In Sec. 52.1020(d), the table is amended by adding an entry for ``Reckitt Benckiser's Air Wick Air Freshener Single Phase Aerosol Spray'' at the end of the table to read as follows: Sec. 52.1020 Identification of plan. * * * * * (d) * * * EPA-Approved Maine Source Specific Requirements ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State effective EPA approval date Name of source Permit number date \2\ Explanations ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * Reckitt Benckiser's Air Wick Alternative 4/23/2013 7/19/2017 [Insert Issued pursuant to Air Freshener Single Phase Control Plan. Federal Register Chapter 152 Control Aerosol Spray. citation]. of Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer Products. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision. [FR Doc. 2017-15048 Filed 7-18-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![33014 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED MAINE REGULATIONS
State effective EPA approval date EPA ap-
State citation Title/subject Explanations
date proval date and citation 1
* * * * * * *
Chapter 119 ................... Motor Vehicle Fuel 7/15/2015 7/19/2017 [Insert Federal Requires the sale of federal RFG year round
Volatility Limit. Register citation]. and removes the 7.8 RVP requirement during
the period of May 1 through September 15 in
7 southern counties.
* * * * * * *
1 In
order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this col-
umn for the particular provision.
* * * * * Do not submit electronically any 61382). Maine subsequently amended
[FR Doc. 2017–15049 Filed 7–18–17; 8:45 am] information you consider to be this rule. The current amended version
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Confidential Business Information (CBI) of the rule became effective in the State
or other information whose disclosure is of Maine on December 15, 2007 and was
restricted by statute. Multimedia approved by EPA into the Maine SIP on
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be May 22, 2012 (77 FR 30216). Chapter
AGENCY accompanied by a written comment. 152 contains VOC content limits for the
The written comment is considered the manufacture and sale of various
40 CFR Part 52 official comment and should include consumer products in the state of
[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0023; A–1–FRL– discussion of all points you wish to Maine. Chapter 152 also provides for
9965–10–Region 1] make. The EPA will generally not state and EPA approval of ACPs by
consider comments or comment allowing the responsible party the
Air Plan Approval; ME; Consumer contents located outside of the primary option of voluntarily applying for such
Products Alternative Control Plan submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or agreements.
other file sharing system). For On March 30, 2012, the Maine DEP
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
additional submission methods, please received an ACP application from
Agency (EPA).
contact the person identified in the ‘‘FOR Reckitt Benckiser LLC (Reckitt) for
ACTION: Direct final rule. Reckitt’s Air Wick Air Freshener Single-
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT’’ section.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection For the full EPA public comment policy, Phase Aerosol Spray pursuant to
Agency (EPA) is approving a State information about CBI or multimedia Chapter 152. The Maine DEP approved
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submissions, and general guidance on the Reckitt ACP effective April 23, 2013
submitted by the Maine Department of making effective comments, please visit and on the same day sent EPA the ACP
Environmental Protection (Maine DEP). http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ for approval into the Maine SIP.
The SIP revision consists of an commenting-epa-dockets. II. Description and Evaluation of the
Alternative Control Plan (ACP) for the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: State’s Submittal
control of volatile organic compound David L. Mackintosh, Air Quality Reckitt manufactures Air Wick Air
(VOC) emissions from Reckitt Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Freshener Single-Phase Aerosol Spray
Benckiser’s Air Wick Air Freshener Protection Agency, EPA New England (Product), which is offered for retail sale
Single Phase Aerosol Spray, issued Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square— and wholesale distribution in the State
pursuant to Maine’s consumer products Suite 100, (Mail Code OEP05–2), of Maine. The Product contains 4.6%
rule. This action is being taken in Boston, MA 02109–3912, tel. 617–918– VOCs by weight. The Chapter 152
accordance with the Clean Air Act. 1584, email Mackintosh.David@epa.gov. regulatory content limit for single-phase
DATES: This direct final rule will be SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: aerosol air freshener is 30% VOCs by
effective September 18, 2017, unless Throughout this document whenever weight. Reckitt’s ACP generates VOC
EPA receives adverse comments by ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean credits, expressed in pounds of VOCs,
August 18, 2017. If adverse comments EPA. based on the difference between the
are received, EPA will publish a timely Product VOC content and regulatory
Table of Contents
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the VOC limit for each unit sold in the State
Federal Register informing the public I. Background and Purpose of Maine. Credits generated are subject
that the rule will not take effect. II. Description and Evaluation of the State’s to the conditions in the ACP Approval.
Submittal
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, Reckitt shall monitor Maine sales of the
III. Final Action
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– IV. Incorporation by Reference Product and each calendar quarter shall
OAR–2017–0023 at http:// V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews provide to the Maine DEP accurate
www.regulations.gov, or via email to records and documentation as a basis
Mackintosh.David@epa.gov. For I. Background and Purpose for compliance reporting. Only sales in
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
comments submitted at Regulations.gov, Maine’s Chapter 152, ‘‘Control of the State of Maine that are substantiated
follow the online instructions for Emissions of Volatile Organic by accurate documentation shall be
submitting comments. Once submitted, Compounds from Consumer Products’’ used in the calculation of VOC
comments cannot be edited or removed (Chapter 152) became effective in the emissions and emission reductions
from Regulations.gov. For either manner State of Maine on September 1, 2004 (surplus reductions). The resulting
of submission, the EPA may publish any and was approved by EPA into the surplus reduction credits shall be
comment received to its public docket. Maine SIP on October 24, 2005 (70 FR discounted by 5% prior to the issuance
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 Jul 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19JYR1.SGM 19JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_33151/page/1.svg)
![33016 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
tribal implications and will not impose States Court of Appeals for the requirements, Volatile organic
substantial direct costs on tribal appropriate circuit by September 18, compounds.
governments or preempt tribal law as 2017. Filing a petition for Dated: July 5, 2017.
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 reconsideration by the Administrator of Deborah A. Szaro,
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). this final rule does not affect the finality
The Congressional Review Act, 5 Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
of this action for the purposes of judicial
England.
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small review nor does it extend the time
Business Regulatory Enforcement within which a petition for judicial Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides review may be filed, and shall not Code of Federal Regulations is amended
that before a rule may take effect, the postpone the effectiveness of such rule as follows:
agency promulgating the rule must or action. Parties with objections to this
submit a rule report, which includes a direct final rule are encouraged to file a PART 52—APPROVAL AND
copy of the rule, to each House of the comment in response to the parallel PROMULGATION OF
Congress and to the Comptroller General notice of proposed rulemaking for this IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
of the United States. Section 804, action published in the proposed rules
however, exempts from section 801 the section of this Federal Register, rather ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
following types of rules: Rules of than file an immediate petition for continues to read as follows:
particular applicability; rules relating to judicial review of this direct final rule, Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
agency management or personnel; and so that EPA can withdraw this direct
rules of agency organization, procedure, final rule and address the comment in Subpart U—Maine
or practice that do not substantially the proposed rulemaking. This action
affect the rights or obligations of non- may not be challenged later in ■ 2. In § 52.1020(d), the table is
agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because proceedings to enforce its requirements. amended by adding an entry for
this is a rule of particular applicability, (See section 307(b)(2).) ‘‘Reckitt Benckiser’s Air Wick Air
EPA is not required to submit a rule Freshener Single Phase Aerosol Spray’’
report regarding this action under List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 at the end of the table to read as follows:
section 801. Environmental protection, Air
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean pollution control, Incorporation by § 52.1020 Identification of plan.
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of reference, Intergovernmental relations, * * * * *
this action must be filed in the United Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping (d) * * *
EPA-APPROVED MAINE SOURCE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
State effective EPA approval
Name of source Permit number Explanations
date date 2
* * * * * * *
Reckitt Benckiser’s Air Wick Air Fresh- Alternative Control 4/23/2013 7/19/2017 [Insert Issued pursuant to Chapter 152 Con-
ener Single Phase Aerosol Spray. Plan. Federal Reg- trol of Volatile Organic Compounds
ister citation]. from Consumer Products.
2 In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this col-
umn for the particular provision.
[FR Doc. 2017–15048 Filed 7–18–17; 8:45 am] updates, corrections and minor edits. restricted by statute. Multimedia
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P EPA does not anticipate any adverse submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
comments. accompanied by a written comment.
DATES: This rule is effective on The written comment is considered the
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION official comment and should include
September 18, 2017 without further
AGENCY discussion of all points you wish to
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by August 18, 2017. If EPA make. The EPA will generally not
48 CFR Parts 1501, 1504, 1509, 1515, consider comments or comment
1516, 1517, 1519, 1535, 1552 and 1553 receives adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the contents located outside of the primary
[EPA–HQ–OARM–2017–0126; FRL 9960–62– Federal Register informing the public submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
OARM] that the rule will not take effect. other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
Administrative Amendments to EPA public comment policy,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– information about CBI or multimedia
Environmental Protection Agency
OARM–2017–0126, at https:// submissions, and general guidance on
Acquisition Regulation
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online making effective comments, please visit
AGENCY: Environmental Protection instructions for submitting comments.
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
Agency (EPA). Once submitted, comments cannot be
commenting-epa-dockets.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
ACTION: Direct final rule. edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection received to its public docket. Do not Julianne Odend’hal, Office of
Agency (EPA) is issuing a final rule to submit electronically any information Acquisition Management (Mail Code
amend the Environmental Protection you consider to be Confidential 3802R), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Acquisition Regulation Business Information (CBI) or other Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
(EPAAR) to make administrative information whose disclosure is NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:03 Jul 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19JYR1.SGM 19JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_33151/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-07-19 06:17:27
Document Modified: 2017-07-19 06:17:27
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This direct final rule will be effective September 18, 2017, unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 18, 2017. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | David L. Mackintosh, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail Code OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912, tel. 617-918-1584, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 33014 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR