82 FR 33045 - Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber From the Republic of Korea: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 137 (July 19, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 137 (July 19, 2017)
| Page Range | 33045-33047 | |
| FR Document | 2017-14950 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 19, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 33045-33047] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-14950] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-890] Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber From the Republic of Korea: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) determines that emulsion styrene-butadiene rubber (ESB rubber) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). DATES: July 19, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carrie Bethea or Kabir Archuletta, AD/ CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1491 or (202) 482-2593, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On February 24, 2017, the Department of Commerce published the Preliminary Determination of this antidumping duty investigation, as provided by section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act), in which the Department found that ESB rubber from Korea was sold at LTFV.\1\ A summary of the events that occurred since the Department published the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by interested parties for this final determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ The Issues and Decision Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures, 82 FR 11536 (February 24, 2017) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (Preliminary Decision Memorandum) (collectively, Preliminary Determination). \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from the Republic of Korea,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is ESB rubber from Korea. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I. Scope Comments No interested party commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice.\3\ Therefore, the scope of this investigation remains unchanged for this final determination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico and Poland: Initiation of Less Than Fair Value Investigations, 81 FR 55438 (August 19, 2016) (Initiation Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Verification As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, in April and June 2017, the Department conducted verification of the information reported by a mandatory respondent, LG Chem, Ltd. (LG Chem), and its U.S. affiliate, LG Chem America, Ltd., for use in the Department's final determination. The Department used standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant accounting and production records and original source documents provided by the respondent.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Memorandum, ``Verification of the Cost Response of LG Chem, Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Emulsion Styrene- Butadiene Rubber from the Republic of South Korea,'' dated April 13, 2017; Memorandum, ``Verification of U.S. Sales of LG Chem America, Inc., in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Emulsion Styrene- Butadiene Rubber from the Republic of Korea,'' dated May 3, 2017; Memorandum, ``Verification of LG Chem, Ltd., in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Emulsion-Styrene Butadiene Rubber from the Republic of Korea,'' dated June 14, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Because Daewoo International Corporation (Daewoo) and Kumho Petrochemical Co, Ltd (Kumho), mandatory respondents in this investigation, did not provide information requested by the Department, and the Department preliminarily determined Daewoo and Kumho to have been uncooperative, the Department did not verify their books and records and facilities. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs that were submitted by parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of these issues is attached to this notice as Appendix II. Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at verification, we made certain changes to the margin calculation for LG Chem, and also the all-others rate. Use of Adverse Facts Available The Department found in the Preliminary Determination that it was appropriate to apply facts available with adverse inferences to Daewoo and Kumho. No interested parties commented on the preliminary application of adverse facts-available dumping margins to Daewoo and Kumho. For the final determination, the Department has not altered its analysis or decision to apply adverse facts-available to Daewoo and Kumho. For a full discussion of the Department's adverse facts available determination, see the Preliminary Determination. All-Others Rate Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that in the final determination the Department shall determine an estimated all-others rate for all exporters [[Page 33046]] and producers not individually examined. This rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. For the final determination, the Department assigned a rate based entirely on facts available to Daewoo and Kumho. Therefore, the only rate that is not zero, de minimis or based entirely on facts otherwise available is the rate calculated for LG Chem. Consequently, the rate calculated for LG Chem is also assigned as the rate for all-other producers and exporters, pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. Final Determination The Department determines that the following estimated weighted- average dumping margins exist: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Estimated weighted- average Exporter/producer dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Daewoo International Corporation........................ ** 44.30 Kumho Petrochemical Co, Ltd............................. ** 44.30 LG Chem, Ltd............................................ 9.66 All-Others.............................................. 9.66 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ** (AFA). Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part In accordance with section 733(e) of the Act, the Department preliminarily found critical circumstances exist with respect to Daewoo and Kumho and do not exist with respect to LG Chem and the non- individually examined companies receiving the ``All-Others'' rate in this investigation. The Department did not receive comments concerning the preliminary affirmative determination of critical circumstances. For the final determination, the Department continues to find that, in accordance with 735(a)(3) of the Act, critical circumstances exist for Daewoo and Kumho. A discussion of the determination can be found in the ``Critical Circumstances'' section of the Issues and Decision Memarandum. Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend liquidation of all appropriate entries of ESB rubber from Korea as described in Appendix I of this notice, which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after, February 24, 2017, the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination of this investigation in the Federal Register. Further, pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(d), the Department will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the estimated weighted- average dumping margin or the estimated all-others rate, as follows: (1) The cash deposit rate for the respondents listed above will be equal to the respondent-specific estimated weighted-average dumping margins determined in this final determination; (2) if the exporter is not a respondent identified above, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be equal to the respondent-specific estimated weighted-average dumping margin established for that producer of the subject merchandise; and (3) the cash deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will be equal to the all-others estimated weighted-average dumping margin. Because of the Department's affirmative determination of critical circumstances for Daewoo and Kumho, in accordance with section 735(a)(3) and (c)(4)(A) of the Act, suspension of liquidation of ESB rubber from Korea, shall continue to apply, for Daewoo and Kumho, to unliquidated entries of merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date which is 90 days before the publication of the Preliminary Determination. Disclosure The Department intends to disclose to interested parties its calculations and analysis performed in this final determination within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, the Department will notify the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its final determination. Because the final determination in this proceeding is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports of ESB rubber from Korea no later than 45 days after the Department's final determination. If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of material injury does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all securities posted will be refunded or canceled. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, the Department will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by the Department, antidumping duties on appropriate imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of the suspension of liquidation. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. This determination and this notice are issued and published pursuant to sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(c). Dated: July 10, 2017. Gary Taverman Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation For purposes of this investigation, the product covered is cold- polymerized emulsion styrene-butadiene rubber (ESB rubber). The scope of the investigation includes, but is not limited to, ESB rubber in primary forms, bales, granules, crumbs, pellets, powders, plates, sheets, strip, etc. ESB rubber consists of non-pigmented rubbers and oil-extended non-pigmented rubbers, both of which contain at least one percent of organic acids from the emulsion polymerization process. ESB rubber is produced and sold in accordance with a generally accepted set of product specifications issued by the International Institute of Synthetic Rubber Producers (IISRP). The scope of the investigation covers grades of ESB rubber included in the IISRP 1500 and 1700 series of synthetic rubbers. The 1500 grades are light in color and are often described as ``Clear'' or ``White Rubber.'' The 1700 grades are oil-extended and thus darker in color, and are often called ``Brown Rubber.'' Specifically excluded from the scope of this investigation are products which are manufactured by blending ESB rubber with [[Page 33047]] other polymers, high styrene resin master batch, carbon black master batch (i.e., IISRP 1600 series and 1800 series) and latex (an intermediate product). The products subject to this investigation are currently classifiable under subheadings 4002.19.0015 and 4002.19.0019 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). ESB rubber is described by Chemical Abstract Services (CAS) Registry No. 9003- 55-8. This CAS number also refers to other types of styrene butadiene rubber. Although the HTSUS subheadings and CAS registry number are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope Comments IV. Scope of the Investigation V. Margin Calculations VI. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: CEP Offset Comment 2: Cost Adjustments Based on Transactions Disregarded Rule Comment 3: Cost Adjustments Based on Verification Findings Comment 4: Sales Expense Adjustments Based on Verification Findings Comment 5: Duty Drawback Adjustment VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-14950 Filed 7-18-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2017 / Notices 33045
classification, while non-interstate SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the information reported by a
limited-access highways are classified mandatory respondent, LG Chem, Ltd.
Background
as S1200. This change will make all (LG Chem), and its U.S. affiliate, LG
limited-access highways S1100. The On February 24, 2017, the Department Chem America, Ltd., for use in the
final description of the Primary Roads of Commerce published the Preliminary Department’s final determination. The
(S1100) classification is: Determination of this antidumping duty Department used standard verification
investigation, as provided by section procedures, including an examination of
Primary roads are limited-access highways
that connect to other roads only at
735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as relevant accounting and production
interchanges and not at at-grade amended (Act), in which the records and original source documents
intersections. This category includes Department found that ESB rubber from provided by the respondent.4
interstate highways, as well as all other Korea was sold at LTFV.1 A summary of Because Daewoo International
highways with limited access (some of which the events that occurred since the Corporation (Daewoo) and Kumho
are toll roads). Limited-access highways with Department published the Preliminary Petrochemical Co, Ltd (Kumho),
only one lane in each direction, as well as Determination, as well as a full
those that are undivided, are also included
mandatory respondents in this
discussion of the issues raised by investigation, did not provide
under S1100. interested parties for this final information requested by the
The final description makes clear that determination, may be found in the Department, and the Department
secondary roads are not limited-access Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 The preliminarily determined Daewoo and
highways. The final description of Issues and Decision Decision Kumho to have been uncooperative, the
Secondary Roads (S1200) is: Memorandum is a public document and Department did not verify their books
Secondary roads are main arteries that are is on file electronically via Enforcement and records and facilities.
not limited access, usually in the U.S. and Compliance’s Antidumping and
highway, state highway, or county highway Countervailing Duty Centralized Analysis of Comments Received
systems. These roads have one or more lanes Electronic Service System (ACCESS). All issues raised in the case and
of traffic in each direction, may or may not ACCESS is available to registered users rebuttal briefs that were submitted by
be divided, and usually have at-grade at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
intersections with many other roads and parties in this investigation are
parties in the Central Records Unit, addressed in the Issues and Decision
driveways. They often have both a local
name and a route number. Room B8024 of the main Department of Memorandum. A list of these issues is
Commerce building. In addition, a attached to this notice as Appendix II.
Dated: July 13, 2017. complete version of the Issues and Based on our analysis of the comments
Ron S. Jarmin, Decision Memorandum can be accessed received and our findings at
Performing the Non-Exclusive Functions and directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ verification, we made certain changes to
Duties of the Director, Bureau of the Census. frn/. the margin calculation for LG Chem,
[FR Doc. 2017–15125 Filed 7–18–17; 8:45 am] and also the all-others rate.
Scope of the Investigation
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
The product covered by this Use of Adverse Facts Available
investigation is ESB rubber from Korea. The Department found in the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE For a complete description of the scope Preliminary Determination that it was
of this investigation, see Appendix I. appropriate to apply facts available with
International Trade Administration
Scope Comments adverse inferences to Daewoo and
[A–580–890]
No interested party commented on the Kumho. No interested parties
scope of the investigation as it appeared commented on the preliminary
Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber application of adverse facts-available
From the Republic of Korea: Final in the Initiation Notice.3 Therefore, the
dumping margins to Daewoo and
Affirmative Determination of Sales at scope of this investigation remains
Kumho. For the final determination, the
Less Than Fair Value, and Final unchanged for this final determination.
Department has not altered its analysis
Affirmative Determination of Critical Verification or decision to apply adverse facts-
Circumstances, in Part available to Daewoo and Kumho. For a
As provided in section 782(i) of the
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Act, in April and June 2017, the full discussion of the Department’s
International Trade Administration, Department conducted verification of adverse facts available determination,
Department of Commerce. see the Preliminary Determination.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 1 See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from
All-Others Rate
(the Department) determines that the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Affirmative
emulsion styrene-butadiene rubber (ESB Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act
Affirmative Determination of Critical provides that in the final determination
rubber) from the Republic of Korea Circumstances, in Part, Postponement of Final
(Korea) is being, or is likely to be, sold Determination, and Extension of Provisional the Department shall determine an
in the United States at less than fair Measures, 82 FR 11536 (February 24, 2017) and estimated all-others rate for all exporters
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum
value (LTFV). (Preliminary Decision Memorandum) (collectively, 4 Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of the Cost
DATES: July 19, 2017. Preliminary Determination). Response of LG Chem, Ltd. in the Antidumping
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Duty Investigation of Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene
Carrie Bethea or Kabir Archuletta, AD/ Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Rubber from the Republic of South Korea,’’ dated
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Emulsion April 13, 2017; Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of U.S.
CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from the Republic of Sales of LG Chem America, Inc., in the
and Compliance, International Trade Korea,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby Antidumping Duty Investigation of Emulsion
Administration, U.S. Department of adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from the Republic of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Memorandum). Korea,’’ dated May 3, 2017; Memorandum,
3 See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from ‘‘Verification of LG Chem, Ltd., in the Antidumping
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico and Poland: Duty Investigation of Emulsion-Styrene Butadiene
(202) 482–1491 or (202) 482–2593, Initiation of Less Than Fair Value Investigations, 81 Rubber from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated June 14,
respectively. FR 55438 (August 19, 2016) (Initiation Notice). 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:49 Jul 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_33182/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2017 / Notices 33047
other polymers, high styrene resin master DATES: Applicable June 5, 2017. Department calculated for Goodman in
batch, carbon black master batch (i.e., IISRP the Final Redetermination.
1600 series and 1800 series) and latex (an FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
intermediate product). Chien-Min Yang, AD/CVD Operations, Timken Notice
The products subject to this investigation Office VII, Enforcement and In its decision in Timken,5 as clarified
are currently classifiable under subheadings Compliance, International Trade by Diamond Sawblades,6 the Court of
4002.19.0015 and 4002.19.0019 of the Administration, U.S. Department of
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
Appeals for the Federal Circuit held
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the
States (HTSUS). ESB rubber is described by NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
Chemical Abstract Services (CAS) Registry Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
(202) 482–5484. the Department must publish a notice of
No. 9003–55–8. This CAS number also refers
to other types of styrene butadiene rubber. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: a court decision that is not ‘‘in
Although the HTSUS subheadings and CAS harmony’’ with a Department
registry number are provided for convenience Background determination and must suspend
and customs purposes, the written liquidation of entries pending a
description of the scope of this investigation
Goodman is a Chinese producer/
exporter of fresh garlic and requested a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s
is dispositive. May 26, 2017, final judgment sustaining
new shipper review on November 27,
Appendix II 2012, and amended that request on the Final Redetermination constitutes a
December 6, 2012.1 On January 2, 2013, final decision of the Court that is not in
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum the Department initiated the requested harmony with the Department’s Final
NSR covering the period November 1, Rescission. This notice is published in
I. Summary fulfillment of the Timken publication
II. Background 2011, through October 31, 2012.
requirements. Accordingly, the
III. Scope Comments On April 21, 2014, the Department
IV. Scope of the Investigation Department will continue the
issued the Final Rescission. In the Final suspension of liquidation of the subject
V. Margin Calculations Rescission, the Department determined
VI. Discussion of the Issues merchandise pending a final and
that Goodman’s sales were not bona fide conclusive court decision.
Comment 1: CEP Offset
Comment 2: Cost Adjustments Based on
and, accordingly, rescinded its new
Transactions Disregarded Rule shipper review.2 Goodman challenged Amended Final Results
Comment 3: Cost Adjustments Based on the Department’s findings in the Final Because there is now a final court
Verification Findings Rescission at the CIT. decision, we are amending the Final
Comment 4: Sales Expense Adjustments On March 22, 2016, the CIT remanded Rescission with respect to the dumping
Based on Verification Findings for the Department to reconsider its margin calculated for Goodman. Based
Comment 5: Duty Drawback Adjustment decision.3 on the Final Redetermination, as
VII. Recommendation
Per the Court’s instructions, the affirmed by the CIT, the revised
[FR Doc. 2017–14950 Filed 7–18–17; 8:45 am]
Department reconsidered its previous dumping margin for Goodman, from
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
analysis and determined, under protest, November 1, 2011, through October 31,
Goodman’s U.S. sales to be bona fide. 2012, is $0.08/kg.
The Department found Goodman to be In the event that the CIT’s ruling is
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
eligible for a new shipper review and not appealed or, if appealed, is upheld
International Trade Administration addressed comments raised in case by a final and conclusive court decision,
briefs and rebuttal briefs during the new the Department will instruct Customs
[A–570–831] and Border Protection (CBP) to assess
shipper review regarding the
preliminarily-calculated rate. In the antidumping duties on unliquidated
Fresh Garlic From the People’s
final remand results filed with the CIT entries of subject merchandise based on
Republic of China: Notice of Court
on August 22, 2016 (Final the revised dumping margin listed
Decision Not in Harmony With Final
Redetermination), the Department made above.
Rescission and Notice of Amended
Final Results changes to the surrogate values and re- Cash Deposit Requirements
calculated Goodman’s individually-
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Since the Final Rescission, the
determined antidumping duty rate to be
International Trade Administration, Department has not established a cash
$0.08 per kilogram.
Department of Commerce. deposit rate for Goodman.7 Therefore,
SUMMARY: On May 26, 2017, the Court
On May 26, 2017, the CIT sustained the Department will issue revised cash
of International Trade (the CIT) the Department’s Final Redetermination deposit instructions to CBP, adjusting
sustained the Department of in full.4 Thus, the CIT affirmed the the cash deposit rate for Goodman to
Commerce’s (the Department) final $0.08/kg dumping margin the $0.08/kg, effective June 5, 2017.
remand results pertaining to the new Notification to Interested Parties
1 See Goodman’s letter, ‘‘Fresh Garlic from the
shipper review of the antidumping duty
People’s Republic of China—Re-filing Request for This notice is issued and published in
order on fresh garlic from the People’s Antidumping New Shipper Review of Shijiazhuang
Republic of China (PRC) for Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.,’’ (December 6, 2012).
accordance with section 516A(e)(1),
Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., 2 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
China: Final Rescission of Antidumping Duty New
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Ltd. (Goodman). The Department is
Shipper Review of Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading 5 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337,
notifying the public that the final Co., Ltd., 79 FR 22,098 (April 21, 2014) (Final 341 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
judgment in this case is not in harmony Rescission), and accompanying Issues and Decision 6 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
with the final rescission of the new Memorandum. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
shipper review and that the Department 3 See Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co. v. (Diamond Sawblades).
has found Goodman eligible for a new United States, 172 F. Supp. 3d 1363, 1368–82 (Ct. 7 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of
Int’l Trade 2016). China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of the
shipper review resulting in an 4 See Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd. v. 18th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
individually-determined dumping United States, CIT Slip Op. 17–63, Consol. Ct. No. 2011–2012, 79 FR 36,721 (June 30, 2014) (Final
margin of $0.08/kg. 14–00101 (May 26, 2017). Results).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:49 Jul 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_33182/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-07-19 06:17:34
Document Modified: 2017-07-19 06:17:34
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | July 19, 2017. | |
| Contact | Carrie Bethea or Kabir Archuletta, AD/ CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1491 or (202) 482-2593, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 33045 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR