82_FR_33184 82 FR 33047 - Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Rescission and Notice of Amended Final Results

82 FR 33047 - Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Rescission and Notice of Amended Final Results

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 137 (July 19, 2017)

Page Range33047-33048
FR Document2017-15140

On May 26, 2017, the Court of International Trade (the CIT) sustained the Department of Commerce's (the Department) final remand results pertaining to the new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China (PRC) for Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd. (Goodman). The Department is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the final rescission of the new shipper review and that the Department has found Goodman eligible for a new shipper review resulting in an individually-determined dumping margin of $0.08/kg.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 137 (Wednesday, July 19, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33047-33048]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-831]


Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court 
Decision Not in Harmony With Final Rescission and Notice of Amended 
Final Results

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 26, 2017, the Court of International Trade (the CIT) 
sustained the Department of Commerce's (the Department) final remand 
results pertaining to the new shipper review of the antidumping duty 
order on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China (PRC) for 
Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd. (Goodman). The Department is 
notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in 
harmony with the final rescission of the new shipper review and that 
the Department has found Goodman eligible for a new shipper review 
resulting in an individually-determined dumping margin of $0.08/kg.

DATES: Applicable June 5, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chien-Min Yang, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5484.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Goodman is a Chinese producer/exporter of fresh garlic and 
requested a new shipper review on November 27, 2012, and amended that 
request on December 6, 2012.\1\ On January 2, 2013, the Department 
initiated the requested NSR covering the period November 1, 2011, 
through October 31, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Goodman's letter, ``Fresh Garlic from the People's 
Republic of China--Re-filing Request for Antidumping New Shipper 
Review of Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.,'' (December 6, 
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On April 21, 2014, the Department issued the Final Rescission. In 
the Final Rescission, the Department determined that Goodman's sales 
were not bona fide and, accordingly, rescinded its new shipper 
review.\2\ Goodman challenged the Department's findings in the Final 
Rescission at the CIT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Rescission of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Shijiazhuang 
Goodman Trading Co., Ltd., 79 FR 22,098 (April 21, 2014) (Final 
Rescission), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 22, 2016, the CIT remanded for the Department to 
reconsider its decision.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co. v. United States, 172 
F. Supp. 3d 1363, 1368-82 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Per the Court's instructions, the Department reconsidered its 
previous analysis and determined, under protest, Goodman's U.S. sales 
to be bona fide. The Department found Goodman to be eligible for a new 
shipper review and addressed comments raised in case briefs and 
rebuttal briefs during the new shipper review regarding the 
preliminarily-calculated rate. In the final remand results filed with 
the CIT on August 22, 2016 (Final Redetermination), the Department made 
changes to the surrogate values and re-calculated Goodman's 
individually-determined antidumping duty rate to be $0.08 per kilogram.
    On May 26, 2017, the CIT sustained the Department's Final 
Redetermination in full.\4\ Thus, the CIT affirmed the $0.08/kg dumping 
margin the Department calculated for Goodman in the Final 
Redetermination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd. v. United States, 
CIT Slip Op. 17-63, Consol. Ct. No. 14-00101 (May 26, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\5\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\6\ 
the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to 
section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the 
Department must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ``in 
harmony'' with a Department determination and must suspend liquidation 
of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's May 26, 
2017, final judgment sustaining the Final Redetermination constitutes a 
final decision of the Court that is not in harmony with the 
Department's Final Rescission. This notice is published in fulfillment 
of the Timken publication requirements. Accordingly, the Department 
will continue the suspension of liquidation of the subject merchandise 
pending a final and conclusive court decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341 (Fed. 
Cir. 1990) (Timken).
    \6\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 
F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results

    Because there is now a final court decision, we are amending the 
Final Rescission with respect to the dumping margin calculated for 
Goodman. Based on the Final Redetermination, as affirmed by the CIT, 
the revised dumping margin for Goodman, from November 1, 2011, through 
October 31, 2012, is $0.08/kg.
    In the event that the CIT's ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, 
is upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, the Department will 
instruct Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping 
duties on unliquidated entries of subject merchandise based on the 
revised dumping margin listed above.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    Since the Final Rescission, the Department has not established a 
cash deposit rate for Goodman.\7\ Therefore, the Department will issue 
revised cash deposit instructions to CBP, adjusting the cash deposit 
rate for Goodman to $0.08/kg, effective June 5, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results and Partial Rescission of the 18th Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 79 FR 36,721 (June 30, 2014) 
(Final Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 
516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.


[[Page 33048]]


    Dated: July 13, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-15140 Filed 7-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2017 / Notices                                                    33047

                                                    other polymers, high styrene resin master                DATES:   Applicable June 5, 2017.                     Department calculated for Goodman in
                                                    batch, carbon black master batch (i.e., IISRP                                                                  the Final Redetermination.
                                                    1600 series and 1800 series) and latex (an               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                    intermediate product).                                   Chien-Min Yang, AD/CVD Operations,                    Timken Notice
                                                       The products subject to this investigation            Office VII, Enforcement and                              In its decision in Timken,5 as clarified
                                                    are currently classifiable under subheadings             Compliance, International Trade                       by Diamond Sawblades,6 the Court of
                                                    4002.19.0015 and 4002.19.0019 of the                     Administration, U.S. Department of
                                                    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
                                                                                                                                                                   Appeals for the Federal Circuit held
                                                                                                             Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue                    that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the
                                                    States (HTSUS). ESB rubber is described by               NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
                                                    Chemical Abstract Services (CAS) Registry                                                                      Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
                                                                                                             (202) 482–5484.                                       the Department must publish a notice of
                                                    No. 9003–55–8. This CAS number also refers
                                                    to other types of styrene butadiene rubber.              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            a court decision that is not ‘‘in
                                                    Although the HTSUS subheadings and CAS                                                                         harmony’’ with a Department
                                                    registry number are provided for convenience             Background                                            determination and must suspend
                                                    and customs purposes, the written                                                                              liquidation of entries pending a
                                                    description of the scope of this investigation
                                                                                                                Goodman is a Chinese producer/
                                                                                                             exporter of fresh garlic and requested a              ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s
                                                    is dispositive.                                                                                                May 26, 2017, final judgment sustaining
                                                                                                             new shipper review on November 27,
                                                    Appendix II                                              2012, and amended that request on                     the Final Redetermination constitutes a
                                                                                                             December 6, 2012.1 On January 2, 2013,                final decision of the Court that is not in
                                                    List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
                                                    Decision Memorandum                                      the Department initiated the requested                harmony with the Department’s Final
                                                                                                             NSR covering the period November 1,                   Rescission. This notice is published in
                                                    I. Summary                                                                                                     fulfillment of the Timken publication
                                                    II. Background                                           2011, through October 31, 2012.
                                                                                                                                                                   requirements. Accordingly, the
                                                    III. Scope Comments                                         On April 21, 2014, the Department
                                                    IV. Scope of the Investigation                                                                                 Department will continue the
                                                                                                             issued the Final Rescission. In the Final             suspension of liquidation of the subject
                                                    V. Margin Calculations                                   Rescission, the Department determined
                                                    VI. Discussion of the Issues                                                                                   merchandise pending a final and
                                                                                                             that Goodman’s sales were not bona fide               conclusive court decision.
                                                       Comment 1: CEP Offset
                                                       Comment 2: Cost Adjustments Based on
                                                                                                             and, accordingly, rescinded its new
                                                          Transactions Disregarded Rule                      shipper review.2 Goodman challenged                   Amended Final Results
                                                       Comment 3: Cost Adjustments Based on                  the Department’s findings in the Final                   Because there is now a final court
                                                          Verification Findings                              Rescission at the CIT.                                decision, we are amending the Final
                                                       Comment 4: Sales Expense Adjustments                     On March 22, 2016, the CIT remanded                Rescission with respect to the dumping
                                                          Based on Verification Findings                     for the Department to reconsider its                  margin calculated for Goodman. Based
                                                       Comment 5: Duty Drawback Adjustment                   decision.3                                            on the Final Redetermination, as
                                                    VII. Recommendation
                                                                                                                Per the Court’s instructions, the                  affirmed by the CIT, the revised
                                                    [FR Doc. 2017–14950 Filed 7–18–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                             Department reconsidered its previous                  dumping margin for Goodman, from
                                                    BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                                                                             analysis and determined, under protest,               November 1, 2011, through October 31,
                                                                                                             Goodman’s U.S. sales to be bona fide.                 2012, is $0.08/kg.
                                                                                                             The Department found Goodman to be                       In the event that the CIT’s ruling is
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                                                                                             eligible for a new shipper review and                 not appealed or, if appealed, is upheld
                                                    International Trade Administration                       addressed comments raised in case                     by a final and conclusive court decision,
                                                                                                             briefs and rebuttal briefs during the new             the Department will instruct Customs
                                                    [A–570–831]                                                                                                    and Border Protection (CBP) to assess
                                                                                                             shipper review regarding the
                                                                                                             preliminarily-calculated rate. In the                 antidumping duties on unliquidated
                                                    Fresh Garlic From the People’s
                                                                                                             final remand results filed with the CIT               entries of subject merchandise based on
                                                    Republic of China: Notice of Court
                                                                                                             on August 22, 2016 (Final                             the revised dumping margin listed
                                                    Decision Not in Harmony With Final
                                                                                                             Redetermination), the Department made                 above.
                                                    Rescission and Notice of Amended
                                                    Final Results                                            changes to the surrogate values and re-               Cash Deposit Requirements
                                                                                                             calculated Goodman’s individually-
                                                    AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,                                                                             Since the Final Rescission, the
                                                                                                             determined antidumping duty rate to be
                                                    International Trade Administration,                                                                            Department has not established a cash
                                                                                                             $0.08 per kilogram.
                                                    Department of Commerce.                                                                                        deposit rate for Goodman.7 Therefore,
                                                    SUMMARY: On May 26, 2017, the Court
                                                                                                                On May 26, 2017, the CIT sustained                 the Department will issue revised cash
                                                    of International Trade (the CIT)                         the Department’s Final Redetermination                deposit instructions to CBP, adjusting
                                                    sustained the Department of                              in full.4 Thus, the CIT affirmed the                  the cash deposit rate for Goodman to
                                                    Commerce’s (the Department) final                        $0.08/kg dumping margin the                           $0.08/kg, effective June 5, 2017.
                                                    remand results pertaining to the new                                                                           Notification to Interested Parties
                                                                                                               1 See Goodman’s letter, ‘‘Fresh Garlic from the
                                                    shipper review of the antidumping duty
                                                                                                             People’s Republic of China—Re-filing Request for        This notice is issued and published in
                                                    order on fresh garlic from the People’s                  Antidumping New Shipper Review of Shijiazhuang
                                                    Republic of China (PRC) for                              Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.,’’ (December 6, 2012).
                                                                                                                                                                   accordance with section 516A(e)(1),
                                                    Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co.,                          2 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of    751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
                                                                                                             China: Final Rescission of Antidumping Duty New
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES




                                                    Ltd. (Goodman). The Department is
                                                                                                             Shipper Review of Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading          5 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337,
                                                    notifying the public that the final                      Co., Ltd., 79 FR 22,098 (April 21, 2014) (Final       341 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
                                                    judgment in this case is not in harmony                  Rescission), and accompanying Issues and Decision       6 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
                                                    with the final rescission of the new                     Memorandum.                                           United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
                                                    shipper review and that the Department                     3 See Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co. v.           (Diamond Sawblades).
                                                    has found Goodman eligible for a new                     United States, 172 F. Supp. 3d 1363, 1368–82 (Ct.       7 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of
                                                                                                             Int’l Trade 2016).                                    China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of the
                                                    shipper review resulting in an                             4 See Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd. v.     18th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
                                                    individually-determined dumping                          United States, CIT Slip Op. 17–63, Consol. Ct. No.    2011–2012, 79 FR 36,721 (June 30, 2014) (Final
                                                    margin of $0.08/kg.                                      14–00101 (May 26, 2017).                              Results).



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:49 Jul 18, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00008   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM   19JYN1


                                                    33048                        Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2017 / Notices

                                                      Dated: July 13, 2017.                                  Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 The                    addressed in the Issues and Decision
                                                    Gary Taverman,                                           Issues and Decision Memorandum is a                     Memorandum. A list of these issues is
                                                    Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping               public document and is on file                          attached to this notice as Appendix II.
                                                    and Countervailing Duty Operations,                      electronically via Enforcement and                      Based on our analysis of the comments
                                                    performing the non-exclusive functions and               Compliance’s Antidumping and                            received and our findings at
                                                    duties of the Assistant Secretary for                    Countervailing Duty Centralized                         verifications, we made certain changes
                                                    Enforcement and Compliance.                              Electronic Service System (ACCESS).                     to the margin calculation for
                                                    [FR Doc. 2017–15140 Filed 7–18–17; 8:45 am]              ACCESS is available to registered users                 ARLANXEO Brasil, and also the all-
                                                    BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                   at https://access.trade.gov, and to all                 others rate.
                                                                                                             parties in the Central Records Unit,
                                                                                                             Room B8024 of the main Department of                    All-Others Rate
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                   Commerce building. In addition, a                         Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act
                                                                                                             complete version of the Issues and                      provides that in the final determination
                                                    International Trade Administration                       Decision Memorandum can be accessed                     the Department shall determine an
                                                                                                             directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/               estimated all-others rate for all exporters
                                                    [A–351–849]                                              frn/.                                                   and producers not individually
                                                    Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber                        Scope of the Investigation                              examined. This rate shall be an amount
                                                    From Brazil: Final Affirmative                                                                                   equal to the weighted average of the
                                                                                                               The product covered by this                           estimated weighted-average dumping
                                                    Determination of Sales at Less Than                      investigation is ESB rubber from Brazil.
                                                    Fair Value and Final Negative                                                                                    margins established for exporters and
                                                                                                             For a complete description of the scope                 producers individually investigated,
                                                    Determination of Critical                                of this investigation, see Appendix I.
                                                    Circumstances                                                                                                    excluding any zero and de minimis
                                                                                                             Scope Comments                                          margins, and any margins determined
                                                    AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,                                                                             entirely under section 776 of the Act.
                                                                                                               No interested party commented on the
                                                    International Trade Administration,                                                                              For the final determination, the
                                                                                                             scope of the investigation as it appeared
                                                    Department of Commerce.                                                                                          Department calculated an individual
                                                                                                             in the Initiation Notice.3 Therefore, we
                                                    SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce                                                                              estimated weighted-average dumping
                                                                                                             did not modify the scope language of
                                                    (Department) determines that emulsion                                                                            margin for ARLANXEO Brasil, the only
                                                                                                             this investigation remains unchanged
                                                    styrene-butadiene rubber (ESB rubber)                                                                            individually examined exporter/
                                                                                                             for this final determination.
                                                    from Brazil is being, or is likely to be,                                                                        producer in this investigation. Because
                                                    sold in the United States at less than fair              Verification                                            the only individually calculated
                                                    value (LTFV). The period of                                As provided in section 782(i) of the                  dumping margin is not zero, de
                                                    investigation (POI) is July 1, 2015,                     Act, in February and March 2017, the                    minimis, or based entirely on facts
                                                    through June 30, 2016.                                   Department conducted verification of                    otherwise available, the estimated
                                                    DATES: July 19, 2017.                                    the information reported by the                         weighted-average dumping margin
                                                                                                             mandatory respondent ARLANXEO                           calculated for ARLANXEO Brasil is the
                                                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                                                                                 margin assigned to all-other producers
                                                    Drew Jackson, AD/CVD Operations,                         Brasil S.A. (ARLANXEO Brasil) and its
                                                                                                             U.S. affiliate, ARLANXEO U.S.A. LLC,                    and exporters, pursuant to section
                                                    Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,                                                                           735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
                                                    International Trade Administration,                      for use in the Department’s final
                                                    U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401                        determination.4 The Department used                     Final Determination
                                                    Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,                     standard verification procedures,
                                                                                                             including an examination of relevant                      The Department determines that the
                                                    DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4406.                                                                             following estimated weighted-average
                                                                                                             accounting and production records and
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                                                                       dumping margins exist:
                                                                                                             original source documents provided by
                                                    Background                                               the respondent.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Estimated
                                                      On February 24, 2017, the Department                   Analysis of Comments Received                                                                             weighted-
                                                    published the Preliminary                                                                                                                                           average
                                                                                                               All issues raised in the case and                               Exporter/producer                       dumping
                                                    Determination of this antidumping duty                   rebuttal briefs that were submitted by                                                                     margins
                                                    LTFV investigation, as provided by                       parties in this investigation are                                                                         (percent)
                                                    section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                    amended (Act), in which the                                 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
                                                                                                                                                                     ARLANXEO Brasil S.A. ..............                   19.61
                                                    Department found that ESB rubber from                    Memorandum for the Final Determination in the
                                                                                                                                                                     All-Others ....................................       19.61
                                                    Brazil sold at LTFV.1 A summary of the                   Less Than Fair Value Investigation of Emulsion
                                                    events that have occurred since the                      Styrene-Butadiene Rubber From Brazil,’’ dated           Final Negative Determination of
                                                                                                             concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this          Critical Circumstances
                                                    Department published the Preliminary                     notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
                                                    Determination, as well as a full                            3 See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from
                                                                                                                                                                        On January 25, 2017, the petitioners 5
                                                    discussion of the issues raised by                       Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico and Poland:       filed a timely critical circumstances
                                                    interested parties for this final                        Initiation of Less Than Fair Value Investigations, 81
                                                                                                             FR 55438 (August 19, 2016) (Initiation Notice).         allegation, pursuant to section 733(e)(1)
                                                    determination, may be found in the                                                                               of the Act and 19 CFR 351.206(c)(1),
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of the

                                                                                                             Constructed Export Price Sales Questionnaire            alleging that critical circumstances exist
                                                      1 See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from           Responses of ARLANXEO U.S.A. LLC,’’ dated April         with respect to imports of ESB rubber
                                                    Brazil: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of         13, 2017; Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of the Home
                                                    Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Negative                  Market and Constructed Export Price Sales
                                                                                                                                                                     from Brazil.6 On February 24, 2017, the
                                                    Determination of Critical Circumstances,                 Questionnaire Responses of ARLANXEO Brasil
                                                                                                                                                                       5 Lion Elastomers LLC and East West Copolymers
                                                    Postponement of Final Determination, and                 S.A.,’’ dated April 21, 2017; and Memorandum,
                                                    Extension of Provisional Measures, 82 FR 11538           ‘‘Verification of the Cost Response of ARLANXEO         (collectively, the petitioners).
                                                    (February 24, 2017), and accompanying Preliminary        Brasil S.A. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation         6 See Letter to the Honorable Penny Pritzker,

                                                    Decision Memorandum (collectively, Preliminary           of Certain Emulsion Styrene Butadiene Rubber from       Secretary of Commerce, from the Petitioners,
                                                    Determination).                                          Brazil,’’ dated May 15, 2017.                           concerning, ‘‘Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:49 Jul 18, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00009   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM     19JYN1



Document Created: 2017-07-19 06:17:49
Document Modified: 2017-07-19 06:17:49
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable June 5, 2017.
ContactChien-Min Yang, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5484.
FR Citation82 FR 33047 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR