82 FR 33059 - Narrow Woven Ribbon With Woven Selvedge From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Administrative Review and Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 137 (July 19, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 137 (July 19, 2017)
| Page Range | 33059-33061 | |
| FR Document | 2017-15139 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 19, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 33059-33061] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-15139] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-952] Narrow Woven Ribbon With Woven Selvedge From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Administrative Review and Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge (woven ribbons) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) for the period of review (POR) September 1, 2015 through August 31, 2016. This review covers two PRC companies: Huzhou Kingdom Coating Industry Co., Ltd. (Huzhou Kingdom) and Huzhou Unifull Label Fabric Co., Ltd. (Huzhou Unifull). The Department preliminarily finds that neither Huzhou Unifull nor Huzhou Kingdom established eligibility for a separate rate, as Huzhou Unifull had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR and Huzhou Kingdom failed to participate in the proceeding. Furthermore, the Department is rescinding administrative review with respect to Huzhou BeiHeng Textile Co., Ltd. (Huzhou BeiHeng) and Huzhou Siny Label Material Co., Ltd. (Huzhou Siny). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable July 19, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3147. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On September 17, 2010, the Department published in the Federal Register an amended antidumping duty order on woven ribbons from the PRC.\1\ On September 8, 2016, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the Order.\2\ On September 27, 2016, Avery Dennison Corporation (Avery Dennison) timely requested a review of four companies: Huzhou BeiHeng, Huzhou Siny, Huzhou Kingdom, and Huzhou Unifull.\3\ Additionally, on September 30, 2016, Berwick Offray LLC and its subsidiary Lion Ribbon Company, LLC (the petitioner) timely requested a review \4\ of the producer/exporter Yama Ribbons and Bows Co., Ltd. (Yama Ribbons). However, the Department determined in the underlying investigation that merchandise produced and exported by Yama Ribbons is excluded from the antidumping duty order; as a result, the Department did not initiate an administrative review on Yama Ribbons.\5\ On November 9, 2016, the Department initiated a review of four companies: Huzhou BeiHeng, Huzhou Siny, Huzhou Kingdom, and Huzhou Unifull.\6\ On May 31, 2017, the Department extended the deadline for the preliminary results by a total of 26 days until June 28, 2017.\7\ On June 28, 2017, the Department extended the deadline for the preliminary results by an additional 14 days until July 12, 2017.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 53632 (September 1, 2010), as amended in Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the People's Republic of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 56982 (September 17, 2010) (Order). \2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 62096 (September 8, 2016). \3\ See Letter from Avery Dennison to the Department, Re: ``Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from China: Request for Administrative Review,'' dated September 27, 2016. \4\ See Letter from petitioner to the Department, Re: ``Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from the People's Republic of China/Petitioner's Request for Administrative Review,'' dated September 30, 2016. \5\ See Order, 75 FR 56982. \6\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 78778 (November 9, 2016) (Initiation Notice). \7\ See Memorandum from Aleksandras Nakutis to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary, regarding ``Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated May 31, 2017. \8\ See Memorandum from Aleksandras Nakutis to Gary Taverman, regarding ``Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated June 28, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge. The merchandise subject to the Order is classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030; 5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject merchandise also may enter under HTSUS subheadings 5806.31.00; 5806.32.20; 5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00; 5810.91.00; 5810.99.90; 5903.90.10; 5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80 and under statistical categories 5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080; 5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description in the Order remains dispositive.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, please see ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge from the People's Republic of China,'' from James Maeder, Senior Director performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum''), dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 33060]] Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum. This memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of Review The Department preliminarily finds that both Huzhou Kingdom and Huzhou Unifull have failed to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate and, therefore, they are considered part of the PRC-wide entity. The Department finds that Huzhou Kingdom did not submit a certification of no sales, a separate rate application, or a separate rate certification. With respect to Huzhou Unifull, the Department preliminary finds there are no reviewable entries during the POR and, thus, Huzhou Unifull has failed to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate. Both Avery Dennison and Huzhou Unifull submitted the same CBP Form 7501 to indicate an entry of subject merchandise by Huzhou Unifull. However, after examination, the Department determines that the CBP Form 7501 does not correspond to a sale by Huzhou Unifull and as such, found there are no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Preliminary Decision Memo. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party that requested the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. Huzhou BeiHeng and Huzhou Siny withdrew their respective requests for an administrative review within 90 days of the date of publication of Initiation Notice.\11\ Accordingly, the Department is rescinding this review with respect to Huzhou BeiHeng and Huzhou Siny, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See letter from Avery Dennison to the Department, Re: ``Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from China: Withdrawal from the Administrative Review,'' dated February 7, 2017. \12\ See Appendix. As stated in Change in Practice in NME Reviews, the Department no longer considers the non-market economy (NME) entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013) (Change in Practice in NME Reviews). The PRC-wide entity is not subject to this administrative review because no interested party requested a review of the entity. See Initiation Notice, 81 FR at 78778 (November 9, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure and Public Comment Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results and may submit case briefs and/or written comments, filed electronically using ACCESS, within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, will be due five days after the due date for case briefs, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument a statement of the issue, a summary of the argument not to exceed five pages, and a table of statutes, regulations, and cases cited, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties, who wish to request a hearing, or to participate in a hearing if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, filed electronically using ACCESS. Electronically filed case briefs/written comments and hearing requests must be received successfully in their entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\13\ Hearing requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those issues raised in the respective case briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date of the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230. Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\14\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. For the companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For exports of merchandise exported by Huzhou Kingdom, the cash deposit rate is the PRC-wide rate of 247.26 percent; (2) for exports of merchandise exported by Huzhou Unifull, the cash deposit rate is the PRC-wide rate of 247.26; (3) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters which are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but which have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (4) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that [[Page 33061]] have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 247.26 percent; and (5) for all non- PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: July 12, 2017. Gary Taverman Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Methodology Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Companies That Did Not Establish Eligibility for a Separate Rate Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-15139 Filed 7-18-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2017 / Notices 33059
style,’’ and other similar olives) that have (woven ribbons) from the People’s of the producer/exporter Yama Ribbons
been processed by fermentation only, or by Republic of China (PRC) for the period and Bows Co., Ltd. (Yama Ribbons).
being cured in an alkaline solution for not of review (POR) September 1, 2015 However, the Department determined in
longer than 12 hours and subsequently
fermented; and (2) provisionally prepared
through August 31, 2016. This review the underlying investigation that
olives unsuitable for immediate consumption covers two PRC companies: Huzhou merchandise produced and exported by
(currently classifiable in subheading 0711.20 Kingdom Coating Industry Co., Ltd. Yama Ribbons is excluded from the
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the (Huzhou Kingdom) and Huzhou Unifull antidumping duty order; as a result, the
United States (HTSUS)). Label Fabric Co., Ltd. (Huzhou Unifull). Department did not initiate an
The merchandise subject to this The Department preliminarily finds that administrative review on Yama
investigation is currently classifiable under neither Huzhou Unifull nor Huzhou Ribbons.5 On November 9, 2016, the
subheadings 2005.70.0230, 2005.70.0260, Department initiated a review of four
Kingdom established eligibility for a
2005.70.0430, 2005.70.0460, 2005.70.5030,
separate rate, as Huzhou Unifull had no companies: Huzhou BeiHeng, Huzhou
2005.70.5060, 2005.70.6020, 2005.70.6030,
2005.70.6050, 2005.70.6060, 2005.70.6070, entries of subject merchandise during Siny, Huzhou Kingdom, and Huzhou
2005.70.7000, 2005.70.7510, 2005.70.7515, the POR and Huzhou Kingdom failed to Unifull.6 On May 31, 2017, the
2005.70.7520, and 2005.70.7525 HTSUS. participate in the proceeding. Department extended the deadline for
Subject merchandise may also be imported Furthermore, the Department is the preliminary results by a total of 26
under subheadings 2005.70.0600, rescinding administrative review with days until June 28, 2017.7 On June 28,
2005.70.0800, 2005.70.1200, 2005.70.1600, respect to Huzhou BeiHeng Textile Co., 2017, the Department extended the
2005.70.1800, 2005.70.2300, 2005.70.2510, deadline for the preliminary results by
2005.70.2520, 2005.70.2530, 2005.70.2540, Ltd. (Huzhou BeiHeng) and Huzhou
Siny Label Material Co., Ltd. (Huzhou an additional 14 days until July 12,
2005.70.2550, 2005.70.2560, 2005.70.9100,
2005.70.9300, and 2005.70.9700. Although Siny). Interested parties are invited to 2017.8
HTSUS subheadings are provided for comment on these preliminary results. Scope of the Order
convenience and US Customs purposes, they DATES: Applicable July 19, 2017.
do not define the scope of the investigation; The products covered by the order are
rather, the written description of the subject FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: narrow woven ribbons with woven
merchandise is dispositive. Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD selvedge. The merchandise subject to
[FR Doc. 2017–15142 Filed 7–18–17; 8:45 am] Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & the Order is classifiable under the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Compliance, International Trade Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
Administration, U.S. Department of United States (HTSUS) subheadings
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030;
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject
(202) 482–3147. merchandise also may enter under
International Trade Administration SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: HTSUS subheadings 5806.31.00;
[A–570–952] 5806.32.20; 5806.39.20; 5806.39.30;
Background 5808.90.00; 5810.91.00; 5810.99.90;
Narrow Woven Ribbon With Woven On September 17, 2010, the 5903.90.10; 5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and
Selvedge From the People’s Republic Department published in the Federal 5907.00.80 and under statistical
of China: Preliminary Results of Register an amended antidumping duty categories 5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080;
Administrative Review and Preliminary order on woven ribbons from the PRC.1 5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889.
Partial Rescission of Antidumping On September 8, 2016, the Department Although the HTSUS subheadings are
Duty Administrative Review; 2015– published in the Federal Register a provided for convenience and customs
2016 notice of opportunity to request an purposes, the written product
administrative review of the Order.2 On description in the Order remains
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, dispositive.9
September 27, 2016, Avery Dennison
International Trade Administration,
Corporation (Avery Dennison) timely
Department of Commerce. Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated
requested a review of four companies:
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce September 30, 2016.
Huzhou BeiHeng, Huzhou Siny, Huzhou
(Department) is conducting an 5 See Order, 75 FR 56982.
Kingdom, and Huzhou Unifull.3
administrative review of the 6 See Initiation of Antidumping and
antidumping duty order on narrow Additionally, on September 30, 2016, Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
woven ribbons with woven selvedge Berwick Offray LLC and its subsidiary 78778 (November 9, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
7 See Memorandum from Aleksandras Nakutis to
Lion Ribbon Company, LLC (the
Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary,
‘‘Sicilian-style’’ green olives. Sicilian-style olives
petitioner) timely requested a review 4 regarding ‘‘Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven
are large, firm green olives with a natural bitter and Selvedge from the People’s Republic of China:
1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Narrow
savory flavor. This style of olive is produced in Extension of Preliminary Results of Antidumping
small quantities in the United States using a Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated May 31, 2017.
Sevillano variety of olive and harvested green with and the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping 8 See Memorandum from Aleksandras Nakutis to
a firm texture. Sicilian-style olives are processed Duty Orders, 75 FR 53632 (September 1, 2010), as Gary Taverman, regarding ‘‘Narrow Woven Ribbons
using a brine-cured method, and undergo a full amended in Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven with Woven Selvedge from the People’s Republic of
fermentation in a salt and lactic acid brine for 4 to Selvedge From Taiwan and the People’s Republic China: Extension of Preliminary Results of
9 months. These olives may be sold whole unpitted, of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
pitted, or stuffed. FR 56982 (September 17, 2010) (Order). June 28, 2017.
2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
‘‘Kalamata’’ olives: Kalamata olives are slightly 9 For a complete description of the scope of the
curved in shape, tender in texture, and purple in Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity order, please see ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
color, and have a rich natural tangy and savory To Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 62096 Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
flavor. This style of olive is produced in Greece (September 8, 2016). Administrative Review: Narrow Woven Ribbons
using a Kalamata variety olive. The olives are 3 See Letter from Avery Dennison to the
With Woven Selvedge from the People’s Republic
harvested after they are fully ripened on the tree, Department, Re: ‘‘Narrow Woven Ribbons with of China,’’ from James Maeder, Senior Director
and typically use a brine-cured fermentation Woven Selvedge from China: Request for performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary
method over 4 to 9 months in a salt brine. Administrative Review,’’ dated September 27, 2016. for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Other specialty olives in a full range of colors, 4 See Letter from petitioner to the Department, Re: Operations, to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant
sizes, and origins, typically fermented in a salt ‘‘Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
brine for 3 months or more. from the People’s Republic of China/Petitioner’s Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:49 Jul 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_33196/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2017 / Notices 33061
have not been found to be entitled to a emulsion styrene-butadiene rubber (ESB Scope Comments
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will rubber) from Poland is being, or is likely No interested party commented on the
be the PRC-wide rate of 247.26 percent; to be, sold in the United States at less scope of the investigation as it appeared
and (5) for all non-PRC exporters of than fair value (LTFV). The period of in the Initiation Notice.3 Therefore, the
subject merchandise which have not investigation (POI) is July 1, 2015, scope of this investigation remains
received their own rate, the cash deposit through June 30, 2016. unchanged for this final determination.
rate will be the rate applicable to the
PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non- DATES: July 19, 2017. Verification
PRC exporter. These deposit FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: As provided in section 782(i) of the
requirements, when imposed, shall Stephen Bailey, AD/CVD Operations, Act, in February, March, and April
remain in effect until further notice. Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 2017, the Department conducted
Notification to Importers International Trade Administration, verification of the information reported
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 by the mandatory respondent Synthos
This notice also serves as a Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, Dwory (Synthos), for use in the
preliminary reminder to importers of DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0193. Department’s final determination. The
their responsibility under 19 CFR Department used standard verification
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: procedures, including an examination of
regarding the reimbursement of relevant accounting and production
Background
antidumping duties prior to liquidation records, and original source documents
of the relevant entries during this On February 24, 2017, the Department provided by the respondent.4
review period. Failure to comply with published the Preliminary
this requirement could result in the Analysis of Comments Received
Determination of this antidumping
Department’s presumption that LTFV investigation, as provided by The issues raised in the case brief that
reimbursement of antidumping duties Section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as was submitted by petitioners 5 in this
occurred and the subsequent assessment amended (Act), in which the investigation are addressed in the Issues
of double antidumping duties. Department found that ESB rubber from and Decision Memorandum. A list of
We are issuing and publishing these Poland was sold at LTFV.1 A summary these issues is attached to this notice as
results in accordance with sections of the events that occurred since the Appendix II. Based on our analysis of
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 Department published the Preliminary the comments received and our findings
CFR 351.213. Determination, as well as a full at verification, we made no changes to
Dated: July 12, 2017. discussion of the issues raised by the margin calculation for Synthos.
Gary Taverman interested parties for this final All-Others Rate
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping determination, may be found in the Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act
and Countervailing Duty Operations, Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 The provides that in the final determination
performing the non-exclusive functions and Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
duties of the Assistant Secretary for the Department shall determine an
public document and is on file estimated all-others rate for all exporters
Enforcement and Compliance. electronically via Enforcement and and producers not individually
Appendix Compliance’s Antidumping and examined. This rate shall be an amount
Countervailing Duty Centralized equal to the weighted-average of the
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Results Decision Memorandum Electronic Service System (ACCESS). estimated weighted-average dumping
ACCESS is available to registered users margins established for exporters and
Summary
Background at https://access.trade.gov, and it is producers individually investigated,
Scope of the Order available to all parties in the Central excluding any zero and de minimis
Discussion of the Methodology Records Unit, Room B–8024 of the main margins, and any margins determined
Preliminary Partial Rescission of Department of Commerce building. In entirely under section 776 of the Act.
Antidumping Duty Administrative addition, a complete version of the For the final determination, the
Review Issues and Decision Memorandum can Department calculated an individual
Companies That Did Not Establish Eligibility be accessed directly at http:// estimated weighted-average dumping
for a Separate Rate
Recommendation enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. margin for Synthos, the only
individually examined exporter/
[FR Doc. 2017–15139 Filed 7–18–17; 8:45 am] Scope of the Investigation producer in this investigation. Because
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
The product covered by this the only individually calculated
investigation is ESB rubber from Poland. dumping margin is not zero, de
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE For a complete description of the scope 3 See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from
of this investigation, see Appendix I. Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico and Poland:
International Trade Administration Initiation of Less Than Fair Value Investigations, 81
1 See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from FR 55438 (August 19, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
[A–455–805]
Poland: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of 4 For discussion of our verification findings, see
Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of the following memoranda: Memorandum,
Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional ‘‘Verification of the Sales Response of Synthos
From Poland: Final Affirmative Measures, 82 FR 11531 (February 24, 2017), and Dwory in the Antidumping Investigation of
Determination of Sales at Less Than accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum Emulsion Styrene Butadiene from Poland,’’ dated
Fair Value (collectively, Preliminary Determination). April 12, 2017 and Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision the Cost Response of Synthos Dwory 7 Spolka z
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Memorandum for the Final Affirmative ograniczona odpowiedzialnoscia sp. j. in the
Determination in the Less Than Fair Value Antidumping Duty Investigation of Emulsion
International Trade Administration, Styrene Butadiene Rubber from Poland,’’ dated May
Investigation of Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene
Department of Commerce. Rubber from Poland,’’ dated concurrently with, and 15, 2017.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 5 Lion Elastomers LLC and East West Copolymers
(the Department) determines that Memorandum). (petitioners).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:49 Jul 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_33196/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-07-19 06:17:19
Document Modified: 2017-07-19 06:17:19
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable July 19, 2017. | |
| Contact | Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3147. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 33059 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR