82 FR 34701 - Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory Safety Standards

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 142 (July 26, 2017)

Page Range34701-34706
FR Document2017-15674

This notice is a summary of petitions for modification submitted to the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) by the parties listed below.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 142 (Wednesday, July 26, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34701-34706]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15674]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Mine Safety and Health Administration


Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory 
Safety Standards

AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is a summary of petitions for modification 
submitted to the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) by the 
parties listed below.

DATES: All comments on the petitions must be received by MSHA's Office 
of Standards, Regulations, and Variances on or before August 25, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by ``docket 
number'' on the subject line, by any of the following methods:
    1. Electronic Mail: [email protected]. Include the docket 
number of the petition in the subject line of the message.
    2. Facsimile: 202-693-9441.
    3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery: MSHA, Office of Standards, 
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Suite 4E401, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-5452, Attention: Sheila McConnell, Director, 
Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances. Persons delivering 
documents are required to check in at the receptionist's desk in Suite 
4E401. Individuals may inspect copies of the petitions and comments 
during normal business hours at the address listed above.
    MSHA will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S. Postal 
Service or proof of delivery from another delivery service such as UPS 
or Federal Express on or before the deadline for comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Barron, Office of Standards, 
Regulations, and Variances at 202-693-9447 (Voice), 
[email protected] (Email), or 202-693-9441 (Facsimile). [These are 
not toll-free numbers.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety 
and Health Act of 1977 and Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
part 44 govern the application, processing, and disposition of 
petitions for modification.

I. Background

    Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 
(Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file 
a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard 
to a coal or

[[Page 34702]]

other mine if the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) determines that:
    1. An alternative method of achieving the result of such standard 
exists which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure 
of protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard; or
    2. That the application of such standard to such mine will result 
in a diminution of safety to the miners in such mine.
    In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish 
the requirements and procedures for filing petitions for modification.

II. Petitions for Modification

    Docket Number: M-2017-010-C.
    Petitioner: Peabody Gateway North Mining, LLC, 12968 Illinois State 
Route 13, Coulterville, IL 62237.
    Mine: Gateway North Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 11-03235, located in 
Randolph County, Illinois.
    Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.500(d) (Permissible electric 
equipment).
    Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the 
existing standard to permit the use of nonpermissible electronic 
testing equipment in the last open crosscut. The petitioner states 
that:
    (1) Nonpermissible electronic testing and diagnostic equipment to 
be used includes: Laptop computers, oscilloscopes, vibration analysis 
machines, cable fault detectors, point temperature probes, infrared 
temperature devices, insulation testers (meggers), voltage, current 
resistance, power testers, and electronic tachometers. Other testing 
and diagnostic equipment may be used if approved in advance by the MSHA 
District Manager.
    (2) All nonpermissible testing and diagnostic equipment used in or 
inby the last open crosscut will be examined by a qualified person as 
defined in 30 CFR 75.153, prior to use to ensure the equipment is being 
maintained in a safe operating condition. These examination results 
will be recorded in the weekly examination book and will be made 
available to MSHA and the miners at the mine.
    (3) A qualified person as defined in 30 CFR 75.151 will 
continuously monitor for methane immediately before and during the use 
of nonpermissible electronic testing and diagnostic equipment in or 
inby the last open crosscut.
    (4) Nonpermissible electronic testing and diagnostic equipment will 
not be used if methane is detected in concentrations at or above one 
percent. When one percent or more methane is detected while the 
nonpermissible electronic equipment is being used, the equipment will 
be de-energized immediately and will be withdrawn outby the last open 
crosscut.
    (5) All hand-held methane detectors will be MSHA-approved and 
maintained in permissible and proper operating condition as defined in 
30 CFR 75.320.
    (6) Except for time necessary to troubleshoot under actual mining 
conditions coal production in the section will cease. However, coal may 
remain in or on the equipment to test and diagnose the equipment under 
``load''.
    (7) All electronic testing and diagnostic equipment will be used in 
accordance with the safe use procedures recommended by the 
manufacturer.
    (8) Qualified personnel who use electronic testing and diagnostic 
equipment will be properly trained to recognize the hazards and 
limitations associated with use of the equipment.
    The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will at 
all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection 
afforded by the standard.

    Docket Number: M-2017-011-C.
    Petitioner: Peabody Gateway North Mining, LLC, 12968 Illinois State 
Route 13, Coulterville, IL 62237.
    Mine: Gateway North Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 11-03235, located in 
Randolph County, Illinois.
    Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.507-1(a) (Electric equipment other 
than power-connection points; outby the last open crosscut; return air; 
permissibility requirements).
    Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the 
existing standard to permit the use of nonpermissible electronic 
testing equipment in return air outby the last open crosscut. The 
petitioner states that:
    (1) Nonpermissible electronic testing and diagnostic equipment to 
be used includes: Laptop computers, oscilloscopes, vibration analysis 
machines, cable fault detectors, point temperature probes, infrared 
temperature devices, insulation testers (meggers), voltage, current 
resistance, power testers, and electronic tachometers. Other testing 
and diagnostic equipment may be used if approved in advance by the MSHA 
District Manager.
    (2) All nonpermissible testing and diagnostic equipment used in 
return air outby the last open crosscut will be examined by a qualified 
person as defined in 30 CFR 75.153, prior to use to ensure the 
equipment is being maintained in a safe operating condition. These 
examination results will be recorded in the weekly examination book and 
will be made available to MSHA and the miners at the mine.
    (3) A qualified person as defined in 30 CFR 75.151 will 
continuously monitor for methane immediately before and during the use 
of nonpermissible electronic testing and diagnostic equipment in return 
air outby the last open crosscut.
    (4) Nonpermissible electronic testing and diagnostic equipment will 
not be used if methane is detected in concentrations at or above one 
percent. When one percent or more methane is detected while the 
nonpermissible electronic equipment is being used, the equipment will 
be de-energized immediately and will be withdrawn from the return air 
outby the last open crosscut.
    (5) All hand-held methane detectors will be MSHA approved and 
maintained in permissible and proper operating condition as defined in 
30 CFR 75.320.
    (7) All electronic testing and diagnostic equipment will be used in 
accordance with the safe use procedures recommended by the 
manufacturer.
    (8) Qualified personnel who use electronic testing and diagnostic 
equipment will be properly trained to recognize the hazards and 
limitations associated with use of the equipment.
    The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will at 
all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection 
afforded by the standard.

    Docket Number: M-2017-012-C.
    Petitioner: The Marion County Coal Company, 151 Johnny Cake Road, 
Metz, West Virginia 26585.
    Mine: Marion County Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 46-01433, located in Marion 
County, West Virginia.
    Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1700 (Oil and gas wells).
    Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of 
that part of the existing standard that requires the operator to 
establish and maintain barriers around its surface directional drilled 
(SDD) wells. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative 
method has been successfully used to prepare coal bed methane (CBM) 
wells for safe intersection by using one or more of the following 
methods: (1) Cement Plug, (2) Polymer Gel, (3) Bentonite Gel, (4) 
Active Pressure Management and Water Infusion, and (5) Remedial Work. 
The proposed alternative method will prevent the CBM well methane from 
entering the

[[Page 34703]]

underground mine. The alternative method includes well plugging 
procedures, water infusion and ventilation method, and procedures for 
mining through a CBM well with horizontal laterals. The petitioner 
states that:
    (1) A minimum working barrier of 300 feet in diameter will be 
maintained around all SDD wells until approval to proceed with mining 
has been obtained from the District Manager (DM). The barrier would 
extend around all vertical and horizontal branches drilled in the coal 
seam. The barrier would also extend around all vertical and horizontal 
branches within overlying coal seams subject to caving or subsidence 
from the coal seam being mined when methane leakage through the 
subsidence zone is possible.
    (2) The DM may choose to approve each branch intersection, each 
well, or a group of wells as applicable to the conditions. The DM may 
require a certified review of the proposed methods to prepare the SDD 
wells for intersection by a professional engineer in order to assess 
the applicability of the proposed system(s) to the mine-specific 
conditions.
    a. The petitioner proposes to use the following procedures for 
preparing, plugging, and replugging SDD wells using mandatory 
computations and administrative procedures prior to plugging or 
replugging:
    (1) Probable Error of Location--Directional drilling systems rely 
on sophisticated angular measurement systems and computer models to 
calculate the estimated location of the well bore. This estimated hole 
location is subject to cumulative measurement errors so that the 
distance between actual and estimated location of the well bore 
increases with the depth of the hole. Modern directional drilling 
systems are typically accurate within one or two degrees depending on 
the specific equipment and techniques. The probable error of location 
is defined by a cone described by the average accuracy of angular 
measurement around the length of the hole. For example, a hole that is 
drilled 500 vertical feet and deviated into a coal seam at a depth of 
700 feet would have a probable error of location at a point that is 
4,000 feet from the hole collar (about 2,986 feet horizontally from the 
well collar) of 69.8 feet (4,000 feet x sine (1.0 degree)) if the 
average accuracy of angular measurement was on degree and 139.6 feet if 
the average accuracy of angular measurement was two degrees. In 
addition to the probable error of location, the true hole location is 
also affected by underground survey errors, surface survey errors, and 
random survey errors.
    (2) Minimum Working Barrier Around Well--For purposes of this 
petition, the minimum working barrier around any CBM well or branches 
of a CBM well in the coal seam is 50 feet plus the probable error of 
location. For example, a hole that is drilled 500 vertical feet and 
deviated into a coal seam at a depth of 700 feet using drilling 
equipment that has an average accuracy of angular measurement of one 
degree, the probable error of location at a point that is 4,000 feet 
from the hole collar is 69.8 feet. Therefore, the minimum working 
barrier around this point of the well bore is 120 feet (69.8 feet plus 
50 feet rounded up to the nearest foot). The 50 additional feet is a 
reasonable separation between the probable location of the well and 
mining operations. When mining is within the minimum working barrier 
distance from a CBM well or branch, the mine operator must comply with 
the provisions of this petition. CBM wells must be prepared in advance 
for safe intersection and specific procedures must be followed on the 
mining section in order to protect the miners when mining within this 
minimum working barrier around the well. The DM may require a greater 
minimum working barrier around CBM wells where geologic conditions, 
historical location errors, or other factors warrant a greater barrier.
    (3) Ventilation Plan Requirements--The ventilation plans will 
contain a description of all SDD CBM wells drilled in the area to be 
mined. This description would include the well numbers, the date 
drilled, the diameter, the casing information, the coal seams 
developed, maximum depth of the wells, abandonment pressures, and any 
other information required by the DM. All or part of this information 
may be listed on the mine ventilation map as required in 30 CFR 75.372. 
As required in 30 CFR 75.371, the ventilation plan will include the 
techniques that the mine operator plans to use to prepare the SDD wells 
for safe intersection, the specifications and stops necessary to 
implement these techniques, and the operational precautions that are 
required when mining within the minimum working barrier. The 
ventilation plan will also contain any additional information or 
provisions related to the SDD wells required by the DM.
    (4) Ventilation Map--The mine ventilation map specified in 30 CFR 
75.372 will contain the following information:
    (i) The surface location of all CBM wells in the active mining area 
and any projected mining area as specified in 30 CFR 75.372(b)(14);
    (ii) Identifying information of CBM wells (i.e. API) hole number or 
equivalent;
    (iii) The date that gas production began from the well;
    (iv) The coal seam intersection of all CBM wells;
    (v) The horizontal extents in the coal seam of all CBM wells and 
branches;
    (vi) The outline of the probable error of location of all CBM 
wells; and
    (vii) The date of mine intersection and the distance between 
estimated and actual locations for all intersections of the CBM well 
and branches.
    b. The petitioner proposes the following mandatory procedures for 
plugging or replugging SDD Wells:

--The mine operator will include in the mine ventilation plan one or 
more of the methods listed below to prepare SDD wells for safe 
intersection. The methods approved in the mine ventilation plan must be 
completed on each SDD well before mining encroaches on the minimum 
working barrier around the well or branch of the well in the coal seam 
being mined. If methane leakage through subsidence cracks is a problem 
when retreat mining, the minimum working barrier must be maintained 
around wells and branches in overlying coal seams or the wells and 
branches must be prepared for safe intersection as specified in the 
mine ventilation plan.

    (1) Cement Plug--Cement will be used to fill the entire SDD hole 
system. Squeeze cementing techniques are necessary for SDD plugging due 
to the lack of tubing in the hole. Cement would fill void spaces and 
eliminate methane leakage along the hole. Once the cement has cured, 
the SDD system may be intersected multiple times without further hole 
preparation. Gas cutting occurs if the placement pressure of the cement 
is less than the methane pressure in the coal seam. Under these 
conditions, gas will bubble out of the coal seam and into the unset 
cement creating a pressurized void or series of interconnected 
pressurized voids. Water cutting occurs when formation water and 
standing water in the hole invades or displaces the unset cement. 
Standing water has to be bailed out of the hole or driven into the 
formation with compressed gas to minimize water cutting. The cement 
pressure must be maintained higher than the formation pressure until 
the cement sets to minimize both gas and water cutting. The cementing 
program in the

[[Page 34704]]

ventilation plan must address both gas and water cutting.
    Due to the large volume to be cemented and potential problems with 
cement setting prior to filling the entire SDD system, adequate sized 
pumping units with backup capacity must be used. Various additives such 
as retarders, lightweight extenders, viscosity modifiers, thixotropic 
modifiers, and fly ash may be used in the cement mix. The volume of 
cement pumped would exceed the estimated hole volume to ensure the 
complete filling of all voids.
    The complete cementing program, including hold dewatering, cement, 
additives, pressures, pumping times and equipment must be specified in 
the mine ventilation plan. The material safety data sheets (MSDS) for 
all cements, additives and components and any personal protective 
equipment and techniques to protect workers from the potentially 
harmful effects of the cement and cement components would be included 
in the ventilation plan. Records of cement mixes, cement quantities, 
pump pressures, and flow rates and times would be retained for each 
hole plugged. SDD holes may be plugged with cement years in advance of 
mining. However, the DM will require suitable documentation of the 
cement plugging in order to approve mining within the minimum working 
barrier around CBM wells.
    (2) Polymer Gel--Polymer gels start out as low viscosity, water-
based mixtures of organic polymer that are crosslinked using time-
delayed activators to form a water-insoluble, high-viscosity gel after 
being pumped into the SDD system. Although polymer gel systems never 
solidify, the activated gel should develop sufficient strength to 
resist gas flow. A gel that is suitable for treating SDD wells for mine 
intersection will reliably fill the SDD system and prevent gas-filled 
voids. Any gel chemistry used for plugging SDD wells should be 
resistant to bacterial and chemical degradation and remain stable for 
the duration of mining through a SDD system.
    Water may dilute the gel mixture to the point where it will not set 
to the required strength. Water in the holes would be removed before 
injecting the gel mixture. Water removal can be accomplished by 
conventional bailing and then injecting compressed gas to squeeze the 
water that accumulated in low spots back into the formation. Gas 
pressurization would be continued until the hole is dry. Another 
potential problem with gels is that dissolved salts in the formation 
waters may interfere with the cross-linking reactions. Any proposed gel 
mixtures must be tested with actual formation waters.
    Equipment to mix and pump gels would have adequate capacity to fill 
the hole before the gel sets. Backup units would be available in case 
something breaks while pumping. The volume of gel pumped would exceed 
the estimated hole volume to ensure the complete filling of all voids 
and allow for gel to infiltrate the joints in the coal seam surrounding 
the hole. Gel injection and setting pressures would be specified in the 
mine ventilation plan. To reduce the potential for an inundation of 
gel, the final level of gel would be close to the level of the coal 
seam and the remainder of the hole would remain open to the atmosphere 
until mining in the vicinity of the SDD system is completed. Packers 
may be used for isolate portions of the SDD system.
    The complete polymer gel program, including advance testing of the 
gel with formation water, dewatering systems, gel specifications, gel 
quantities, gel placement, pressures, and pumping equipment must be 
specified in the mine ventilation plan. The MSDS for all gel components 
and any personal protective equipment and techniques to protect workers 
from potentially harmful effects of the gel and gel components would be 
included in the mine ventilation plan. A record of the calculated hold 
volume, gel quantities, gel formulation, pump pressures and flow rates 
and times would be retained for each hole that is treated with gel. 
Other gel chemistries other than organic polymers may be included in 
the mine ventilation plan with appropriate methods, parameters, and 
safety precautions.
    (3) Bentonite Gel--High pressure injection of bentonite gel into 
the SDD system will infiltrate the cleat and butt joints of the coal 
seam near the well bore and effectively seal these conduits against the 
follow of methane. Bentonite gel is a thixotropic fluid that sets when 
it stops moving, and has a significantly lower setting viscosity than 
polymer gel. The polymer gel fills and seals the borehole, the lower 
strength bentonite gel must penetrate the fractures and jointing in the 
coal seam to be effective in reducing formation permeability around the 
hole. The use of bentonite gel is restricted to deleted CBM 
applications that have low abandonment pressures and limited recharge 
potential. In general, these applications will be mature CBM fields 
with long production histories.
    A slug of water would be injected prior the bentonite gel in order 
to minimize moisture loss bridging near the well bore. The volume of 
gel pumped would exceed the estimated hole volume to ensure that the 
gel infiltrates the joints in the coal seam for several feet 
surrounding the hole. Due to the large gel volume and potential 
problems with premature thixotropic setting, adequately sized pumping 
units with back-up capacity are required. Additives to the gel may be 
required to modify viscosity, reduce filtrates, reduce surface tension, 
and promote sealing of the cracks and joints around the hole. To reduce 
the potential for an inundation of bentonite gel, the final level of 
gel would be approximately the elevation of the coal seam and the 
remainder of the hole would remain open to the atmosphere until mining 
in the vicinity of the SDD system is complete. If a water column is 
used to pressurize the gel, it must be bailed down to the coal seam 
elevation prior to intersection.
    The complete bentonite gel program, including formation 
infiltration and permeability reduction data, hole pretreatment, gel 
specifications, and additives, gel quantities flow rates, injection 
pressures and infiltration times, must be specified in the ventilation 
plan. The ventilation plan should list the equipment used to prepare 
and pump the gel. The MSDS for all gel components and any personal 
protective equipment and techniques to protect workers from the 
potentially harmful effects of the gel and additives would be included 
in the ventilation plan. A record of the hole preparation, gel 
quantities, gel formulation, pump pressures, and flow rates and times 
would be retained for each hole that is treated with bentonite gel.
    (4) Active Pressure Management and Water Infusion--Reducing the 
pressure in the hole to less than atmospheric pressure by operating a 
vacuum blower connected to the wellhead may facilitate safe 
intersection of the hole by a coal mine. The negative pressure in the 
hole will limit the quantity of methane released into the higher 
pressure mine atmosphere. If the mine intersection is near the end of a 
horizontal branch of the SDD system, air will flow from the mine into 
the upstream side of the hold and be exhausted through the blower on 
the surface. On the downstream side of the intersection, if the open 
hole length is short, the methane emitted from this side of the hole 
may be diluted to safe levels with ventilation air. Conversely, safely 
intersecting this system near the bottom of the vertical hole may not 
be possible because the methane emissions from the multiple downstream 
branches may be too great to dilute with ventilation air. The methane 
emission rate is directly proportional to the

[[Page 34705]]

length of the open hole. Successful application of vacuum systems may 
be limited by caving of the hole or water collected in dips in the SDD 
system. Another important factor in the success of vacuum systems is 
the methane liberation rate of the coal formation around the well. 
Older, more depleted wells that have lower methane emission rates are 
more amenable to this technique. The remaining methane content and the 
formation permeability should be addressed in the mine ventilation 
plan.
    Packer may be used to reduce methane inflow into the coal mine 
after intersection. All packers on the downstream side of the hole must 
be equipped with a center pipe so that the inby methane pressure may be 
measured or so that water may be injected. Subsequent intersections 
would not take place if pressure in a packer-sealed hole is excessive. 
Alternatively, methane produced by the downstream hole may be piped to 
an in-mine degas system to safely transport the methane out of the mine 
or may be piped to the return air course for dilution. In-mine methane 
piping would be protected as stipulated in ``Piping Methane in 
Underground Coal Mines, MSHA IR 1094, (1978). Protected methane 
diffusion zones may be established in return air courses if needed.
    Detailed sketches and safety precautions for methane collection, 
piping and diffusion systems must be included in the mine ventilation 
plan (30 CFR 75.371(ee)).
    Water infusion prior to intersecting the well will temporarily 
limit methane flow. Water infusion may also help control coal dust 
levels during mining. High water infusion pressures may be obtained 
prior to the initial intersection by the hydraulic head resulting from 
the hole depth or by pumping. Water infusion pressures for subsequent 
intersections are limited by leakage around in-mine packers and 
limitations of the mine water distribution system. If water is infused 
prior to the initial intersection, the water level in the hole must be 
lowered to the coal seam elevation before the intersection.
    The complete pressure management strategy including negative 
pressure application, wellhead equipment, and use of packers, in-mine 
piping, methane dilution, and water infusion must be specified in the 
mine ventilation plan. Procedures for controlling methane in the 
downstream hole must be specified in the mine ventilation plan. The 
remaining methane content and formation permeability would be addressed 
in the mine ventilation plan. The potential for the coal seam to cave 
into the well would be addressed in the mine ventilation plan. 
Dewatering methods would be included in the mine ventilation plan. A 
record of the negative pressures applied to the system, methane 
liberation, use of packers and any water infusion pressures and 
application time would be retained for each intersection.
    (5) Remedial Work--If problems are encountered in preparing the 
holes for safe intersection, remedial measures must be taken to protect 
the miners. For example, if only one-half of the calculated hold volume 
of cement could be placed into a SDD well due to hole blockage, holes 
would be drilled near each branch that will be intersected and squeeze 
cemented using pressures sufficient to fracture into the potentially 
empty SDD holes. The DM will approve remedial work in the mine 
ventilation plan on a case-by-case basis.
    c. The petitioner proposes to use the following mandatory 
procedures after approval has been granted by the DM to mine within the 
minimum working barrier around the well or branch of the well:
    (1) The mine operator, the DM, a representative of the miners, or 
the appropriate State agency may request a conference prior to any 
intersection or after any intersection to discuss issues or concerns. 
Upon receipt of any request, the DM will schedule a conference. The 
party requesting the conference will notify all other parties listed 
above within a reasonable time prior to the conference to provide 
opportunity for participation.
    (2) The mine operator must notify the DM, the State agency, and the 
representative of the miners at least 48 hours prior the intended 
intersection of any CBM well.
    (3) The initial intersection of a well or branch of a well 
typically has higher risk than subsequent intersections. The initial 
intersection typically indicates if the well preparation is sufficient 
to prevent the inundation of methane. For the initial intersection of a 
well or branch the following procedures are mandatory:
    (a) When mining advances within the minimum barrier distance of the 
well or branches of the well, the entries that will intersect the well 
or branches must be posted with a readily visible marking. For 
longwalls, both the head and tailgate entries must be so marked. Marks 
must be advanced to within 100 feet of the working face as mining 
progresses. Marks will be removed after well or branches are 
intersected in each entry or after mining has exited the minimum 
barrier distance of the well.
    (b) Entries that will intersect vertical segments of a well will be 
marked with drivage sights in the last open crosscut when mining is 
within 100 feet of the well. When a vertical segment of a well will be 
intersected by a longwall, drivage sights will be installed on 10-foot 
centers starting 50 feet in advance of the anticipated intersection. 
Drivage sights will be installed in both the headgate and tailgate 
entries of the longwall.
    (c) Firefighting equipment, including fire extinguishers, rock 
dust, and sufficient fire hose to reach the working face area of the 
mine-through (when either the conventional or continuous mining method 
is used), will be available and operable during each well mine-through. 
A fire hose will be located in the last open crosscut of the entry or 
room. A water line to the belt conveyor tailpiece will be maintained 
along with a sufficient amount of fire hose to reach the farthest point 
of penetration on the section. When the longwall mining method is used, 
a hose to the longwall water supply is sufficient. All fire hoses will 
be connected and ready for use, but do not have to be charged with 
water during the cut-through.
    (d) The operator will keep available at the working section a 
sufficient supply of roof support and ventilation materials. In 
addition, emergency plugs, packers, and setting tools to seal both 
sides of the well or branch will be available in the immediate area of 
the cut-through.
    (e) When mining advances within the minimum working barrier 
distance from the well or branch of the well, the operator will service 
all equipment and check for permissibility at least once daily. Daily 
permissibility examinations must continue until the well or branch is 
intersected or until mining exits the minimum working barrier around 
the well or branch.
    (f) When mining advances within the minimum working barrier 
distance from the well or branch of the well, the operator will 
calibrate the methane monitor(s) on the longwall, continuous mining 
machine and loading machine at least once daily. Daily methane monitor 
calibration must continue until the well or branch is intersected or 
until mining exits the minimum working barrier around the well or 
branch.
    (g) When mining is in progress, the operator will perform tests for 
methane with a handheld methane detector at least every 10 minutes from 
the time mining with the continuous mining machine or longwall face is 
within the minimum working barrier around the well or branch. During 
the cutting

[[Page 34706]]

process, no individual will be allowed on the return side until the 
mine-through has been completed and the area has been examined and 
declared safe. The shearer must be idle when any miners are inby the 
tail drum.
    (h) When using continuous or conventional mining methods, the 
working place will be free from accumulations of coal dust and coal 
spillages, and rock dust will be placed on the roof, rib, and floor to 
within 20 feet of the face when mining through the well or branch. On 
longwall sections, rock dust will be applied on the roof, rib, and 
floor up to both the headgate and tailgate pillared area.
    (i) Immediately after the well or branch is intersected, the 
operator will de-energize all equipment, and the certified person will 
thoroughly examine and determine the working place safe before mining 
is resumed.
    (j) After a well or well branch has been intersected and the 
working place determined safe, mining will continue inby the well a 
sufficient distance to permit adequate ventilation around the area of 
the well or branch.
    (k) No open flame will be permitted in the area until adequate 
ventilation has been established around the wellbore or branch. Any 
casing, tubing or stuck tools will be removed using the methods 
approved in the mine ventilation plan.
    (l) No person will be permitted in the working place of the mine-
through operation during active mining except those persons actually 
engaged in the mining operation, including mine management, 
representatives of miners, personnel from MSHA, and personnel from the 
appropriate State agency.
    (m) The mine operator will warn all personnel in the mine of the 
planned intersection of the well or branch prior to their going 
underground if the planned intersection is to occur during their shift. 
This warning will be repeated for all shifts until the well or branch 
has been intersected.
    (n) A certified official will directly supervise the mine-through 
operation and only the certified official in charge will issue 
instructions concerning the mine-through operation.
    (o) All miners will be in known locations and will stay in 
communication with the responsible person, in accordance with the site 
specific approved emergency response plan when active mining occurs 
within the minimum working barrier of the well or branch.
    (p) The responsible person required in 30 CFR 75.1501 is 
responsible for well intersection emergencies. The well intersection 
procedures must be reviewed by the responsible person prior to any 
planned intersection.
    (q) A copy of the approved petition will be maintained at the mine 
and be available to the miners.
    (r) The provisions of the approved petition do not impair the 
authority of representative of MSHA to interrupt or halt the mine-
through operation and to issue a withdrawal order when its deemed 
necessary for the safety of the miners. MSHA may order an interruption 
or cessation of the mine-through operation and/or withdrawal of 
personnel by issuing either a verbal or a written order to that effect 
to a representative of the operator, and will include the basis for the 
order. Operations in the affected area of the mine may not resume until 
a representative of MSHA permits resumption of mine-through operations. 
The miner operator and miners will comply with verbal or written MSHA 
orders immediately. All verbal orders will be committed to in writing 
within a reasonable time as conditions permit.
    (s) For subsequent intersections of branches of a well, appropriate 
procedures to protect the miners will be specified in the mine 
ventilation plan.
    d. The petitioner proposes to use the following mandatory 
procedures after SDD intersections:
    (1) All intersections with SDD wells and branches that are in 
intake air courses will be examined as part of the pre-shift 
examinations required in 30 CFR 75.360.
    (2) All other intersections with SDD wells and branches will be 
examined as part of the weekly examinations required in 30 CFR 75.364.
    Within 30 days after this petition becomes final, the petitioner 
will submit proposed revisions for its approved Part 48 training plan 
to the DM. These proposed revisions will include initial and refresher 
training regarding compliance with the terms and conditions stated in 
the petition. The mine operator will provide all miners involved in the 
mine-through of a well or branch with training regarding the 
requirements of this petition prior to mining within the minimum 
working barrier of the next well or branch intended to be mined 
through.
    Within 30 days after this petition becomes final, the petitioner 
will submit proposed revisions for its approved mine emergency 
evacuation and firefighting program of instruction required in 30 CFR 
75.1502. The mine operator will revise the program to include the 
hazards and evacuation procedures to be used for well intersections. 
All underground miners will be trained in the revised program within 30 
days of the approval of the revised mine emergency evacuation and 
firefighting program of instruction.
    The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will 
always guarantee the miners no less than the same measure of protection 
afforded by the standard.

Sheila McConnell,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2017-15674 Filed 7-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4520-43-P


Current View
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
DatesAll comments on the petitions must be received by MSHA's Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances on or before August 25, 2017.
ContactBarbara Barron, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances at 202-693-9447 (Voice), [email protected] (Email), or 202-693-9441 (Facsimile). [These are not toll-free numbers.]
FR Citation82 FR 34701 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR