82 FR 35050 - Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 143 (July 27, 2017)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 143 (July 27, 2017)
| Page Range | 35050-35052 | |
| FR Document | 2017-15839 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 143 (Thursday, July 27, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 35050-35052] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-15839] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA-2017-0018] Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of final disposition. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to exempt ten individuals from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). They are unable to meet the vision requirement in one eye for various reasons. The exemptions will enable these individuals to operate commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce without meeting the prescribed vision requirement in one eye. The Agency has concluded that granting these exemptions will provide a level of safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level of safety maintained without the exemptions for these CMV drivers. DATES: The exemptions were granted June 27, 2017. The exemptions expire on June 27, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical Programs Division, (202) 366-4001, [email protected], FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-113, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions regarding viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Electronic Access You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document Management System (FDMS) at http://www.regulations.gov. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy. II. Background On May 26, 2017, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of exemption applications from certain individuals, and requested comments from the public (82 FR 24430). That notice listed ten applicants' case histories. The ten individuals applied for exemptions from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who operate CMVs in interstate commerce. Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption for a two year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level that would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also allows the Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the two year period. Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated the ten applications on their merits and made a determination to grant exemptions to each of them. III. Vision and Driving Experience of the Applicants The vision requirement in the FMCSRs provides: A person is physically qualified to drive a commercial motor vehicle if that person has distant visual acuity of at least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye without corrective lenses or visual acuity separately corrected to 20/40 (Snellen) or better with corrective lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least 20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or without corrective lenses, field of vision of at least 70[deg] in the horizontal meridian in each eye, and the ability to recognize the colors of traffic signals and devices showing red, green, and amber (49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)). FMCSA recognizes that some drivers do not meet the vision requirement but have adapted their driving to accommodate their limitation and demonstrated their ability to drive safely. The ten exemption applicants listed in this notice are in this category. They are unable to meet the vision requirement in one eye for various reasons, including amblyopia, complete loss of vision, congenital cataract, corneal transplant, macular scar, optic neuropathy, and prosthetic eye. In most cases, their eye conditions were not recently developed. Five of the applicants were either born with their vision impairments or have had them since childhood. The five individuals that sustained their vision conditions as adults have had it for a range of 10 to 47 years. Although each applicant has one eye which does not meet the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), each has at least 20/40 corrected vision in the other eye, and in a doctor's opinion, has sufficient vision to perform all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV. Doctors' opinions are supported by the applicants' possession of valid commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) or non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to knowledge and skills tests designed to evaluate their qualifications to operate a CMV. All of these applicants satisfied the testing requirements for their State of residence. By meeting State licensing requirements, the applicants demonstrated their ability to operate a CMV, with their limited vision, to the satisfaction of the State. While possessing a valid CDL or non-CDL, these ten drivers have been authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate commerce, even though their vision disqualified them from driving in interstate commerce. They have driven CMVs with their limited vision in careers ranging for 5 to 35 years. In the past three years, no drivers were involved in crashes and no drivers were convicted of moving violations in a CMV. The qualifications, experience, and medical condition of each applicant were stated and discussed in detail in the May 26, 2017, notice (82 FR 24430). IV. Basis for Exemption Determination Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than would be achieved without the exemption. Without the exemption, applicants will continue to [[Page 35051]] be restricted to intrastate driving. With the exemption, applicants can drive in interstate commerce. Thus, our analysis focuses on whether an equal or greater level of safety is likely to be achieved by permitting each of these drivers to drive in interstate commerce as opposed to restricting him or her to driving in intrastate commerce. To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA considered the medical reports about the applicants' vision as well as their driving records and experience with the vision deficiency. To qualify for an exemption from the vision requirement, FMCSA requires a person to present verifiable evidence that he/she has driven a commercial vehicle safely with the vision deficiency for the past three years. Recent driving performance is especially important in evaluating future safety, according to several research studies designed to correlate past and future driving performance. Results of these studies support the principle that the best predictor of future performance by a driver is his/her past record of crashes and traffic violations. Copies of the studies may be found at Docket Number FMCSA- 1998-3637. FMCSA believes it can properly apply the principle to monocular drivers, because data from the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) former waiver study program clearly demonstrate the driving performance of experienced monocular drivers in the program is better than that of all CMV drivers collectively (See 61 FR 13338, 13345, March 26, 1996). The fact that experienced monocular drivers demonstrated safe driving records in the waiver program supports a conclusion that other monocular drivers, meeting the same qualifying conditions as those required by the waiver program, are also likely to have adapted to their vision deficiency and will continue to operate safely. The first major research correlating past and future performance was done in England by Greenwood and Yule in 1920. Subsequent studies, building on that model, concluded that crash rates for the same individual exposed to certain risks for two different time periods vary only slightly (See Bates and Neyman, University of California Publications in Statistics, April 1952). Other studies demonstrated theories of predicting crash proneness from crash history coupled with other factors. These factors--such as age, sex, geographic location, mileage driven and conviction history--are used every day by insurance companies and motor vehicle bureaus to predict the probability of an individual experiencing future crashes (See Weber, Donald C., ``Accident Rate Potential: An Application of Multiple Regression Analysis of a Poisson Process,'' Journal of American Statistical Association, June 1971). A 1964 California Driver Record Study prepared by the California Department of Motor Vehicles concluded that the best overall crash predictor for both concurrent and nonconcurrent events is the number of single convictions. This study used three consecutive years of data, comparing the experiences of drivers in the first two years with their experiences in the final year. Applying principles from these studies to the past three year record of the ten applicants, no drivers were involved in crashes and no drivers were convicted of moving violations in a CMV. All the applicants achieved a record of safety while driving with their vision impairment, demonstrating the likelihood that they have adapted their driving skills to accommodate their condition. As the applicants' ample driving histories with their vision deficiencies are good predictors of future performance, FMCSA concludes their ability to drive safely can be projected into the future. We believe that the applicants' intrastate driving experience and history provide an adequate basis for predicting their ability to drive safely in interstate commerce. Intrastate driving, like interstate operations, involves substantial driving on highways on the interstate system and on other roads built to interstate standards. Moreover, driving in congested urban areas exposes the driver to more pedestrian and vehicular traffic than exists on interstate highways. Faster reaction to traffic and traffic signals is generally required because distances between them are more compact. These conditions tax visual capacity and driver response just as intensely as interstate driving conditions. The veteran drivers in this proceeding have operated CMVs safely under those conditions for at least three years, most for much longer. Their experience and driving records lead us to believe that each applicant is capable of operating in interstate commerce as safely as he/she has been performing in intrastate commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds that exempting these applicants from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption. For this reason, the Agency is granting the exemptions for the two year period allowed by 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to the ten applicants listed in the notice of May 26, 2017 (82 FR 24430). We recognize that the vision of an applicant may change and affect his/her ability to operate a CMV as safely as in the past. As a condition of the exemption, therefore, FMCSA will impose requirements on the ten individuals consistent with the grandfathering provisions applied to drivers who participated in the Agency's vision waiver program. Those requirements are found at 49 CFR 391.64(b) and include the following: (1) That each individual be physically examined every year (a) by an ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in the better eye continues to meet the requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and (b) by a medical examiner who attests that the individual is otherwise physically qualified under 49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual provide a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical examiner at the time oaf the annual medical examination; and (3) that each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or keep a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-employed. The driver must have a copy of the certification when driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local enforcement official. V. Discussion of Comments FMCSA received one comment in this proceeding. Simon Batter stated the he has worked with Blaine Dickman for 19 years and has never seen or heard of any issues related to his monocular vision. IV. Conclusion Based upon its evaluation of the ten exemption applications, FMCSA exempts the following drivers from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10): Blaine R. Dickman (NV) Sean J. Dornin (PA) Wade J. Jandreau (ME) Eric C. Johnson (WI) Thomas M. Leonard (PA) James Q. Meeks, Jr. (GA) Al V. Nowviock (IL) Hubert O. Pollard (ND) Daniel L. Troop (MI) Jeffrey Waterbury (NY) In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each exemption will be valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has [[Page 35052]] resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. If the exemption is still effective at the end of the two year period, the person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at that time. Issued on: July 19, 2017. Larry W. Minor, Associate Administrator for Policy. [FR Doc. 2017-15839 Filed 7-26-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
![35050 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 143 / Thursday, July 27, 2017 / Notices
the Agency will use to examine the I. Electronic Access FMCSA recognizes that some drivers
feasibility, costs, and benefits of making You may see all the comments online do not meet the vision requirement but
crash preventability determinations. through the Federal Document have adapted their driving to
The data gathered through the Management System (FDMS) at http:// accommodate their limitation and
demonstration program will allow the www.regulations.gov. demonstrated their ability to drive
Agency to better evaluate the utility of Docket: For access to the docket to safely. The ten exemption applicants
making crash preventability read background documents or listed in this notice are in this category.
determinations. As a result, FMCSA is comments, go to http:// They are unable to meet the vision
moving forward to implement this www.regulations.gov and/or Room requirement in one eye for various
demonstration program. W12–140 on the ground level of the reasons, including amblyopia, complete
Issued under the authority delegated in 49 West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue loss of vision, congenital cataract,
CFR 1.87 on: July 19, 2017. SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. corneal transplant, macular scar, optic
Daphne Y. Jefferson, and 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through neuropathy, and prosthetic eye. In most
Friday, except Federal holidays. cases, their eye conditions were not
Deputy Administrator.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 recently developed. Five of the
[FR Doc. 2017–15833 Filed 7–26–17; 8:45 am] applicants were either born with their
U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
from the public to better inform its vision impairments or have had them
rulemaking process. DOT posts these since childhood.
comments, without edit, including any The five individuals that sustained
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION their vision conditions as adults have
personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as had it for a range of 10 to 47 years.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Although each applicant has one eye
Administration described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can which does not meet the vision
be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy. requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
[Docket No. FMCSA–2017–0018] each has at least 20/40 corrected vision
II. Background in the other eye, and in a doctor’s
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption opinion, has sufficient vision to perform
On May 26, 2017, FMCSA published
Applications; Vision all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV.
a notice of receipt of exemption
applications from certain individuals, Doctors’ opinions are supported by the
AGENCY:Federal Motor Carrier Safety
and requested comments from the applicants’ possession of valid
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
public (82 FR 24430). That notice listed commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) or
ACTION: Notice of final disposition. ten applicants’ case histories. The ten non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before
individuals applied for exemptions from issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its the vision requirement in 49 CFR knowledge and skills tests designed to
decision to exempt ten individuals from 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who operate evaluate their qualifications to operate a
the vision requirement in the Federal CMVs in interstate commerce. CMV.
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, All of these applicants satisfied the
(FMCSRs). They are unable to meet the FMCSA may grant an exemption for a testing requirements for their State of
vision requirement in one eye for two year period if it finds ‘‘such residence. By meeting State licensing
various reasons. The exemptions will exemption would likely achieve a level requirements, the applicants
enable these individuals to operate of safety that is equivalent to or greater demonstrated their ability to operate a
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in than the level that would be achieved CMV, with their limited vision, to the
interstate commerce without meeting absent such exemption.’’ The statute satisfaction of the State.
the prescribed vision requirement in also allows the Agency to renew While possessing a valid CDL or non-
one eye. The Agency has concluded that exemptions at the end of the two year CDL, these ten drivers have been
granting these exemptions will provide period. Accordingly, FMCSA has authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate
a level of safety that is equivalent to or evaluated the ten applications on their commerce, even though their vision
greater than the level of safety merits and made a determination to disqualified them from driving in
maintained without the exemptions for grant exemptions to each of them. interstate commerce. They have driven
these CMV drivers. CMVs with their limited vision in
III. Vision and Driving Experience of
careers ranging for 5 to 35 years. In the
DATES: The exemptions were granted the Applicants
past three years, no drivers were
June 27, 2017. The exemptions expire The vision requirement in the involved in crashes and no drivers were
on June 27, 2019. FMCSRs provides: convicted of moving violations in a
A person is physically qualified to CMV.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
drive a commercial motor vehicle if that The qualifications, experience, and
Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical
person has distant visual acuity of at medical condition of each applicant
Programs Division, (202) 366–4001,
least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye were stated and discussed in detail in
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
without corrective lenses or visual the May 26, 2017, notice (82 FR 24430).
Department of Transportation, 1200
acuity separately corrected to 20/40
New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64– IV. Basis for Exemption Determination
(Snellen) or better with corrective
113, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or FMCSA may grant an exemption from
E.T., Monday through Friday, except
without corrective lenses, field of vision the vision requirement in 49 CFR
Federal holidays. If you have questions
of at least 70° in the horizontal meridian 391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is likely
regarding viewing or submitting
in each eye, and the ability to recognize to achieve an equivalent or greater level
material to the docket, contact Docket
the colors of traffic signals and devices of safety than would be achieved
Services, telephone (202) 366–9826.
showing red, green, and amber (49 CFR without the exemption. Without the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 391.41(b)(10)). exemption, applicants will continue to
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Jul 26, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00128 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM 27JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_35193/page/1.svg)
![35052 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 143 / Thursday, July 27, 2017 / Notices
resulted in a lower level of safety than states that of those railroads, 5 safely by FRA before final action is taken.
was maintained before it was granted; or transport more hazmat than GDLK. Comments received after that date will
(3) continuation of the exemption would GDLK conducts ultrasonic rail and be considered as far as practicable.
not be consistent with the goals and geometry testing twice per year over the Anyone can search the electronic
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. entire railroad. GDLK operates to the form of any written communications
If the exemption is still effective at the north of subject trackage from milepost and comments received into any of our
end of the two year period, the person 33 to milepost 102.3 a mix of TWC and dockets by the name of the individual
may apply to FMCSA for a renewal yard limits (YL). There are two manual submitting the comment (or signing the
under procedures in effect at that time. interlockings on the north section of document, if submitted on behalf of an
Issued on: July 19, 2017. track using TWC as an acceptable association, business, labor union, etc.).
method of operation. TWC is the In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT
Larry W. Minor,
method of operation used by all solicits comments from the public to
Associate Administrator for Policy. dispatched Watco railroads, including better inform its processes. DOT posts
[FR Doc. 2017–15839 Filed 7–26–17; 8:45 am] parts of the GDLK. Watco states that the these comments, without edit, including
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P discontinuance of the TCS section and any personal information the
converting it to TWC maintains the commenter provides, to
consistency of dispatching and www.regulations.gov, as described in
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION standardization of training for the the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
GDLK, and will provide a higher level 14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
Federal Railroad Administration
of safety through simplified operations https://www.transportation.gov/privacy.
[Docket Number FRA–2016–0058] by having one method of controlled See also https://www.regulations.gov/
operation rather than the two it has privacyNotice for the privacy notice of
Notice of Application for Approval of now. Watco further states that this regulations.gov.
Discontinuance or Modification of a consistency and standardization of
Railroad Signal System dispatching and training will enhance Robert C. Lauby,
the safety of GDLK operations. Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety,
Under part 235 of Title 49 of the Code Chief Safety Officer.
of Federal Regulations (CFR) and 49 A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the [FR Doc. 2017–15789 Filed 7–26–17; 8:45 am]
U.S.C. 20502(a), this provides the public
notice that on June 30, 2017, Watco petition, is available for review online at BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
Companies LLC (Watco) petitioned the www.regulatons.gov and in person at the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) U.S. Department of Transportation’s
Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
seeking reconsideration of a decision
regarding the discontinuance or Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Federal Railroad Administration
modification of a signal system. FRA
assigned the petition Docket Number Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m. [Docket Number FRA–2017–0059]
FRA–2016–0058. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays. Petition for Waiver of Compliance
Applicant: Watco Companies LLC,
Interested parties are invited to
Anthony Cox, VP of Engineering, 315 E. Under part 211 of Title 49 of the Code
participate in these proceedings by
3rd St., Pittsburg, KS 66762. of Federal Regulations (CFR), this
submitting written views, data, or
Watco is the owner-operator of the provides the public notice that on June
comments. FRA does not anticipate
Grand Elk Railroad LLC (GDLK), which 27, 2017 the San Bernardino Railroad
scheduling a public hearing in
operates on track that is currently leased Historical Society Inc. (SBRHS)
connection with these proceedings since
from Norfolk Southern Railway petitioned the Federal Railroad
the facts do not appear to warrant a
Company (NS). Watco requests Administration (FRA) for a waiver of
hearing. If any interested parties desire
reconsideration under 49 CFR 235.13(a) compliance from certain provisions of
an opportunity for oral comment, they
of FRA’s denial of its application to the Federal railroad safety regulations
should notify FRA, in writing, before
discontinue and remove the traffic contained at 49 CFR part 230, Steam
the end of the comment period and
control system (TCS) from mile post Locomotive Inspection and
specify the basis for their request.
(MP) 33.00 at Park, in Grand Rapids, MI All communications concerning these Maintenance Standards. FRA assigned
to MP 1.4 at the end of GDLK, in proceedings should identify the the petition docket number FRA–2017–
Elkhart, IN. FRA issued its decision appropriate docket number and may be 0059.
letter denying the application on submitted by any of the following SBRHS maintains and operates No.
November 29, 2016, and issued a second methods: 3751, a 4–8–4 ‘‘Northern’’ type steam
letter to clarify the basis of its decision • Web site: http:// locomotive built by the Baldwin
on January 10, 2017. www.regulations.gov. Follow the online Locomotive Works in 1927 for the
Based on new facts and new evidence, instructions for submitting comments. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad.
Watco is seeking reconsideration of its • Fax: 202–493–2251. SBRHS requests relief from performing
application on behalf of GDLK. Watco • Mail: Docket Operations Facility, the 1472 service day inspection (SDI),
asserts that FRA’s Railroad Safety Board U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 for No. 3751, as it pertains to the
(Board) based its denial on erroneous New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140, inspection of the boiler every 15
information. Watco believes the Washington, DC 20590. calendar years or 1472 service days
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
hazardous materials (hazmat) • Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey under 49 CFR 230.17—One thousand
information provided in the field report Avenue, SE., Room W12–140, four hundred seventy-two (1472) service
considered by the Board was out of date Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. day inspection. SBRHS is requesting an
or incorrect. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, additional 139 calendar days before
Watco owns and operates 20 railroads except Federal Holidays. performing a 1472 SDI. The previous
on 3570 miles of main line that is track Communications received by SDI was performed on August 14, 2002.
warrant controlled (TWC) and Watco September 11, 2017 will be considered Granting relief will allow No. 3751 an
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Jul 26, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00130 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM 27JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_35193/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-07-27 02:07:01
Document Modified: 2017-07-27 02:07:01
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of final disposition. | |
| Dates | The exemptions were granted June 27, 2017. The exemptions expire on June 27, 2019. | |
| Contact | Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical Programs Division, (202) 366-4001, [email protected], FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-113, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions regarding viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 35050 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR