82 FR 35248 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Definition of Non-Public Arbitrator
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 144 (July 28, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 144 (July 28, 2017)
| Page Range | 35248-35250 | |
| FR Document | 2017-15909 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 144 (Friday, July 28, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 35248-35250] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-15909] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-81196; File No. SR-FINRA-2017-025] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Definition of Non-Public Arbitrator July 24, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on July 10, 2017, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by FINRA. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA Rule 12100 of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes (``Customer Code'') and FINRA Rule 13100 of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes (``Industry Code'' and together, ``Codes''), to define a non- public arbitrator to mean a person who is otherwise qualified to serve as an arbitrator, and is disqualified from service as a public arbitrator under the Codes. The text of the proposed rule change is available on FINRA's Web site at http://www.finra.org, at the principal office of FINRA and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. [[Page 35249]] A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose FINRA classifies arbitrators under the Codes as either ``non- public'' or ``public.'' The Codes define these terms.\3\ The non-public arbitrator definition lists affiliations that might qualify a person to serve as a non-public arbitrator at the forum. Conversely, the public arbitrator definition enumerates criteria that disqualify an applicant from inclusion on the public arbitrator roster. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See FINRA Rules 12100(r) and 13100(r) for the definition of non-public arbitrator and Rules 12100(y) and 13100(x) for the definition of public arbitrator. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In 2015, the SEC approved amendments to the definitions of non- public arbitrator and public arbitrator in the Codes.\4\ Among other things, the amendments provided that persons who worked in the financial industry for any duration during their careers would always be classified as non-public arbitrators and the amendments added new disqualifications to the public arbitrator definition relating to an arbitrator's provision of services to parties in securities arbitration and litigation and to revenues earned from the financial industry by an arbitrator's co-workers. The amendments also broadened the disqualifications based on the activities or affiliations of an arbitrator's family members. The intent of the proposed rule change was to address concerns about arbitrator neutrality raised by forum users.\5\ For example, prior to the 2015 amendments, the Codes, with specified exceptions, permitted former financial industry employees who ended their industry affiliations to qualify as public arbitrators five years after leaving the financial industry. Forum users raised concerns about the neutrality of these individuals, and indicated that they did not believe former industry employees should ever serve as public arbitrators. In response to these concerns, the 2015 amendments eliminated the five-year cooling-off period, thereby classifying all former financial industry employees as non-public arbitrators. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Rel. No. 74383 (February 26, 2015), 80 FR 11695 (March 4, 2015). \5\ Regulatory Notice 15-18 (Definitions of Non-Public and Public Arbitrator) describes the changes made to the arbitrator definitions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under the definitions as revised in 2015, the non-public arbitrator roster is composed of individuals who work, or worked, in the financial industry, or provide services to the financial industry or to parties engaged in securities arbitration and litigation. The public arbitrator roster is composed of individuals who do not have any significant affiliation with the financial industry. These arbitrators have never been employed by the industry, do not provide services to the industry or to parties engaged in securities arbitration and litigation, and do not have immediate family members or co-workers who do so. Eligibility Gap The 2015 amendments to the arbitrator definitions created an eligibility gap whereby certain otherwise qualified arbitrators \6\ could not serve in any capacity. The eligibility gap was created when FINRA narrowed the public arbitrator definition as described above. Over 800 public arbitrators were disqualified from the public arbitrator roster under the revised public arbitrator definition. In addition, more than 100 of these disqualified arbitrators did not meet any of the criteria outlined in the non-public arbitrator definition for service on the non-public arbitrator roster. As a result of this eligibility gap, FINRA removed them from service at the forum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ Unless waived by FINRA at its discretion, arbitrator applicants must have a minimum of five years of paid business and/or professional experience and at least two years of college-level credits. Qualification criteria can be found at http://www.finra.org/arbitration-and-mediation/finra-arbitrators. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In most instances, the basis for removal from the roster was an affiliation relating to an arbitrator's family members or co-workers. For example, a real estate attorney in a large law firm that has a securities practice would be disqualified from service as a public arbitrator if the firm derived $50,000 or more in a calendar year from providing services to securities entities. In addition, employment as a real estate attorney would not qualify the arbitrator to serve as a non-public arbitrator under the current definition. Therefore, the arbitrator falls into the eligibility gap. In addition to losing over 100 public arbitrators, the eligibility gap required FINRA to reject over 140 arbitrator applicants in 2016 who met FINRA's minimum arbitrator qualifications. Proposed Rule Change FINRA is proposing to amend the Codes to allow FINRA to appoint individuals to the non-public arbitrator roster if they meet FINRA's general arbitrator qualification criteria,\7\ but cannot be classified as public arbitrators. FINRA would amend the non-public arbitrator definition to delete the specific criteria for inclusion on the non- public arbitrator roster. Instead, Rules 12100(r) and 13100(r) would provide that the term ``non-public arbitrator'' means a person who is otherwise qualified to serve as an arbitrator, and is disqualified from service as a public arbitrator. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Statutory Basis FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\8\ which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, the proposed rule change would close the eligibility gap, simplify the non-public arbitrator definition, and provide greater choice for parties during the panel selection process. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. A key focus of the 2015 amendments was the elimination of certain individuals from the public arbitrator roster. FINRA's intent was not to prevent these individuals from serving in any capacity. Hundreds of arbitrators or arbitrator applicants who formerly qualified to serve as public arbitrators are now unable to serve as arbitrators in the forum. As a result, the pool of eligible arbitrators has decreased, and FINRA is forced to turn away new candidates who would have been eligible to serve but for the recent amendments. The proposed rule change would permit these previously eligible persons to serve as non-public arbitrators. While not changing the public arbitrator definition as approved by the SEC in 2015, the proposed rule change would expand the pool of candidates eligible to serve as non-public arbitrators. FINRA considered revising the public arbitrator definition to close the eligibility gap, but chose to maintain the recently approved criteria that exclude individuals who have any significant affiliation with the financial industry. Increasing the number of qualified arbitrators benefits all parties who come before the forum because it permits parties to consider additional arbitrators during panel selection and may reduce [[Page 35250]] costs that arise due to an insufficient pool of qualified arbitrators such as the costs associated with arbitrators traveling from other hearing locations. Further, readmitting previously qualified persons increases the pool of experienced arbitrators, which strengthens the forum. The proposal would impose no direct or indirect costs on persons previously eliminated from acting as arbitrators, new candidates for arbitrator, or parties accessing the forum. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-FINRA-2017-025 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2017-025. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of FINRA. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2017-025 and should be submitted on or before August 18, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-15909 Filed 7-27-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![35248 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Notices
instituting proceedings to allow for • Send an email to rule-comments@ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
additional analysis of the Proposed Rule sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– COMMISSION
Changes’ consistency with the Act and FICC–2017–002 on the subject line.
the rules thereunder. Specifically, the [Release No. 34–81196; File No. SR–FINRA–
Commission believes that the Proposed Paper Comments
2017–025]
Rule Changes raise questions as to • Send paper comments in triplicate
whether they are consistent with (i) to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act,48 which Financial Industry Regulatory
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
requires, in part, that clearing agency Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
rules be designed to assure the Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
safeguarding of securities in the custody All submissions should refer to File Definition of Non-Public Arbitrator
or control of the clearing agency and, in Numbers SR–DTC–2017–005, SR–FICC–
general, protect investors and the public July 24, 2017.
2017–009, or SR–NSCC–2017–006. This
interest, and (ii) Rule 17Ad–22(e)(4) file number should be included on the Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
under the Act, which requires, in subject line if email is used. To help the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
general, that each covered clearing Commission process and review your (‘‘Act’’)1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
agency establish, implement, maintain comments more efficiently, please use notice is hereby given that on July 10,
and enforce written policies and only one method. The Commission will 2017, Financial Industry Regulatory
procedures reasonably designed to, post all comments on the Commission’s Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the
among other things, effectively identify, Securities and Exchange Commission
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
measure, monitor, and manage their (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
credit exposures to participants and rule change as described in Items I, II,
submission, all subsequent and III below, which Items have been
those arising from its payment, clearing,
amendments, all written statements prepared by FINRA. The Commission is
and settlement processes.49
with respect to the Proposed Rule publishing this notice to solicit
As discussed above, pursuant to the Changes that are filed with the
Proposed Rule Changes, Clearing comments on the proposed rule change
Commission, and all written from interested persons.
Agencies would adopt the Framework,
communications relating to the
which would procedures for identifying, I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Proposed Rule Change between the
measuring, monitoring, and managing Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Commission and any person, other than
their credit exposures to members. The the Proposed Rule Change
Commission solicits comment on those that may be withheld from the
whether the Proposed Rule Changes are public in accordance with the FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA
consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be Rule 12100 of the Code of Arbitration
the Act 50 and Rule 17Ad–22(e)(4) under available for Web site viewing and Procedure for Customer Disputes
the Act.51 printing in the Commission’s Public (‘‘Customer Code’’) and FINRA Rule
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 13100 of the Code of Arbitration
IV. Request for Written Comments Washington, DC 20549, on official Procedure for Industry Disputes
The Commission requests that business days between the hours of (‘‘Industry Code’’ and together,
interested persons provide written 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such ‘‘Codes’’), to define a non-public
submissions of their views, data, and filings also will be available for arbitrator to mean a person who is
arguments with respect to issues raised inspection and copying at the principal otherwise qualified to serve as an
by the Proposed Rule Changes. In office of the Clearing Agencies and on arbitrator, and is disqualified from
particular, the Commission invites the DTCC’s Web site (http://dtcc.com/legal/ service as a public arbitrator under the
written views of interested persons sec-rule-filings.aspx). All comments Codes.
concerning whether the Proposed Rule received will be posted without change; The text of the proposed rule change
Changes are consistent with Sections the Commission does not edit personal is available on FINRA’s Web site at
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act and Rules 17Ad– identifying information from http://www.finra.org, at the principal
22(e)(4) under the Act, cited above, or submissions. You should submit only office of FINRA and at the
any other provision of the Act, or the information that you wish to make Commission’s Public Reference Room.
rules and regulations thereunder. available publicly. All submissions II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Interested persons are invited to submit should refer to File Numbers SR–DTC– Statement of the Purpose of, and
written data, views, and arguments on 2017–005, SR–FICC–2017–009, or SR– Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
or before August 14, 2017. Any person NSCC–2017–006 and should be Change
who wishes to file a rebuttal to any submitted on or before August 14, 2017.
other person’s submission must file that In its filing with the Commission,
If comments are received, any rebuttal FINRA included statements concerning
rebuttal on or before August 18, 2017.
comments should be submitted on or the purpose of and basis for the
Comments may be submitted by any of
before August 18, 2017. proposed rule change and discussed any
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of comments it received on the proposed
Electronic Comments
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated rule change. The text of these statements
• Use the Commission’s Internet authority.52 may be examined at the places specified
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Eduardo A. Aleman, in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared
rules/sro.shtml); or Assistant Secretary. summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
[FR Doc. 2017–15905 Filed 7–27–17; 8:45 am]
and C below, of the most significant
48 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). aspects of such statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
49 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(4).
50 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
51 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(4). 52 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(57). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Jul 27, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM 28JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_35392/page/1.svg)
![35250 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2017 / Notices
costs that arise due to an insufficient post all comments on the Commission’s 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
pool of qualified arbitrators such as the Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ change to: (i) Amend IEX Rule 11.231 to
costs associated with arbitrators rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the modify the manner in which the
traveling from other hearing locations. submission, all subsequent Exchange opens trading for non-IEX-
Further, readmitting previously amendments, all written statements listed securities beginning at the start of
qualified persons increases the pool of with respect to the proposed rule Regular Market Hours; and (ii) amend
experienced arbitrators, which change that are filed with the IEX Rules 11.190 and 11.220 to specify
strengthens the forum. Commission, and all written the order types eligible to participate in
The proposal would impose no direct communications relating to the the proposed opening process for non-
or indirect costs on persons previously proposed rule change between the IEX listed securities and priority of such
eliminated from acting as arbitrators, Commission and any person, other than orders. The proposed rule change was
new candidates for arbitrator, or parties those that may be withheld from the published for comment in the Federal
accessing the forum. public in accordance with the
Register on April 28, 2017.3 On May 19,
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 2017, IEX filed Amendment No. 1 to the
available for Web site viewing and
Statement on Comments on the proposal. On June 9, 2017, IEX
printing in the Commission’s Public
Proposed Rule Change Received from consented to an extension of time for
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Members, Participants, or Others the Commission to act on the proposal
Washington, DC 20549, on official
Written comments were neither business days between the hours of until July 5, 2017.4 On June 22, 2017,
solicited nor received. 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such IEX filed Amendment No. 2 to the
filing also will be available for proposal, which superseded and
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
inspection and copying at the principal replaced Amendment No. 1 in its
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
office of FINRA. All comments received entirety. On June 29, 2017, IEX filed
Commission Action
will be posted without change; the Amendment No. 3 to the proposal,
Within 45 days of the date of Commission does not edit personal which superseded and replaced
publication of this notice in the Federal identifying information from Amendment No. 2 in its entirety.5 Also
Register or within such longer period (i) submissions. You should submit only on June 29, 2017, pursuant to Section
as the Commission may designate up to information that you wish to make 19(b)(2) of the Act,6 the Commission
90 days of such date if it finds such available publicly. designated a longer period within which
longer period to be appropriate and All submissions should refer to File to approve the proposed rule change,
publishes its reasons for so finding or Number SR–FINRA–2017–025 and disapprove the proposed rule change, or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory should be submitted on or before
organization consents, the Commission institute proceedings to determine
August 18, 2017. whether to approve or disapprove the
will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove For the Commission, by the Division of proposed rule change.7 The Commission
such proposed rule change, or Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated received no comments on the proposed
authority.9 rule change. The Commission is
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change Eduardo A. Aleman, publishing this notice to solicit
should be disapproved. Assistant Secretary. comment on Amendment No. 3 to the
[FR Doc. 2017–15909 Filed 7–27–17; 8:45 am] proposed rule change from interested
IV. Solicitation of Comments
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P persons, and is approving the proposed
Interested persons are invited to rule change, as modified by Amendment
submit written data, views and No. 3, on an accelerated basis.
arguments concerning the foregoing, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
including whether the proposed rule COMMISSION 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
change is consistent with the Act. 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80514
Comments may be submitted by any of [Release No. 34–81195; File No. SR–IEX–
(April 24, 2017), 82 FR 19763 (‘‘Notice’’).
2017–11]
the following methods: 4 See letter from Claudia Crowley, Chief
Regulatory Officer, IEX, to Richard Holley,
Electronic Comments Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Assistant Director, Division of Trading and Markets,
Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of
• Use the Commission’s Internet Commission, dated June 9, 2017.
Filing of Amendment No. 3 and Order 5 Amendment No. 3 revised the proposal to: (i)
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
Granting Accelerated Approval of Provide additional clarity regarding the process for
rules/sro.shtml); or
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by determining the opening match price; (ii) modify
• Send an email to rule-comments@ the definition of ‘‘Cross Tie Breaker’’ to account for
Amendment No. 3, To Modify the
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– the requirement under the National Market System
Manner in Which the Exchange Opens
FINRA–2017–025 on the subject line. Plan to Implement a Tick Size Pilot Program (‘‘Tick
Trading for Non-IEX-Listed Securities Size Pilot’’) that certain securities be traded in
Paper Comments nickel increments; and (iii) correct certain
July 24, 2017.
• Send paper comments in triplicate typographical errors. Amendment No. 3 also revised
I. Introduction the proposal to fix an error in the proposed rule text
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange in Amendment No. 2 and correct additional
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
On April 13, 2017, Investors Exchange typographical errors. Amendment No. 3 is available
Washington, DC 20549–1090. LLC (‘‘IEX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-iex-2017-11/
All submissions should refer to File with the Securities and Exchange iex201711-1831518-154558.pdf.
6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
Number SR–FINRA–2017–025. This file Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81052
number should be included on the to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
(June 29, 2017), 82 FR 31377 (July 6, 2017). The
subject line if email is used. To help the Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule Commission designated July 27, 2017 as the date by
Commission process and review your which the Commission shall approve or disapprove,
comments more efficiently, please use 9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). or institute proceedings to determine whether to
only one method. The Commission will 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). approve or disapprove, the proposed rule change.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Jul 27, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM 28JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_35392/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-07-28 03:10:41
Document Modified: 2017-07-28 03:10:41
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 35248 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR