82 FR 3639 - Air Plan Approval; TN Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 NO2
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 8 (January 12, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 8 (January 12, 2017)
| Page Range | 3639-3641 | |
| FR Document | 2017-00161 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 3639-3641] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-00161] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R04-OAR-2015-0252; FRL-9957-90-Region 4] Air Plan Approval; TN Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action on portions of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission, submitted by the State of Tennessee, through the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), on March 13, 2014, to demonstrate that the State meets the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2 ) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). The CAA requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by EPA, which is commonly referred to as an ``infrastructure'' SIP submission. TDEC certified that the Tennessee SIP contains provisions that ensure the 2010 NO2 NAAQS is implemented, enforced, and maintained in Tennessee. EPA has determined that portions of Tennessee's infrastructure SIP submission, provided to EPA on March 13, 2014, satisfies the certain required infrastructure elements for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS. DATES: This rule will be effective February 13, 2017. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2015-0252. All documents in the docket are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly [[Page 3640]] available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Wong, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Wong can be reached via electronic mail at [email protected] or via telephone at (404) 562-8726. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background and Overview On February 9, 2010 (75 FR 6474), EPA published a new 1-hour primary NAAQS for NO2 at a level of 100 parts per billion (ppb), based on a 3-year average of the 98th percentile of the yearly distribution of 1-hour daily maximum concentrations. Pursuant to section 110(a)(1) of the CAA, states are required to submit SIPs meeting the requirements of section 110(a)(2) within three years after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS or within such shorter period as EPA may prescribe. Section 110(a)(2) requires states to address basic SIP requirements, including emissions inventories, monitoring, and modeling to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. States were required to submit such SIPs for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS to EPA no later than January 22, 2013. In a proposed rulemaking published on July 14, 2016, EPA proposed to approve Tennessee's infrastructure SIP submission for the applicable requirements of the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS, with the exception of the PSD permitting requirements for major sources of sections 110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of D(i), and (J), and the interstate transport provisions of prongs 1, 2, and 4 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i). On March 18, 2015, EPA approved Tennessee's March 13, 2014, infrastructure SIP submission regarding the PSD permitting requirements for major sources of sections 110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of D(i), and (J) for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS. See 80 FR 14019. Therefore, EPA is not taking any action today pertaining to these requirements. With respect to the interstate transport requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2), EPA does not yet have a submission before the Agency for action. Additionally, EPA will address prong 4 element of Tennessee's March 13, 2014, SIP submission for the 2010 1- hour NO2 NAAQS through a separate rulemaking. The details of Tennessee's submission and the rationale for EPA's action are explained in the proposed rulemaking. II. Response to Comment Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due on or before July 28, 2016. EPA received one comment, which is summarized below, on the proposed action. Comment: The Commenter stated that EPA must disapprove element 110(a)(2)(C) unless Tennessee's SIP provides that no new minor source or minor modification of a major source can cause or contribute to a violation of any NAAQS. Response: EPA agrees that section 110(a)(2)(C) and the minor new source regulations at 40 CFR 51.160 through 51.164 require SIPs to includes procedures to prevent the construction of new minor sources and minor modifications of major sources if the new or modified source will interfere with attainment or maintenance of a NAAQS. EPA explained its approach to reviewing the minor source element of 110(a)(2)(C) in its proposed rulemaking for this action: ``EPA evaluates whether the state has an EPA-approved minor new source review program and whether the program addresses the pollutants relevant to that NAAQS. In the context of acting on an infrastructure SIP submission, however, EPA does not think it is necessary to conduct a review of each and every provision of a state's existing minor source program (i.e., already in the existing SIP) for compliance with the requirements of the CAA and EPA's regulations that pertain to such programs.'' See 81 FR 45441 (July 14, 2016). In its 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS infrastructure SIP submission, Tennessee certified that its SIP contains provisions to address the 110(a)(2)(C) requirements regarding new minor sources and modifications, and, as noted in EPA's proposed rulemaking, the following SIP-approved rules address the minor source element of section 110(a)(2)(C): Tennessee Air Pollution Control Regulations 1200- 03-09-.01, Construction Permits, and 1200-03-09-.03, General Provisions. These SIP-approved rules address NAAQS pollutants including NO2. While the Commenter did not specifically object to any aspect of Tennessee's SIP submission with respect section 110(a)(2)(C), EPA notes that Tennessee's SIP addresses this non-interference component for the minor new source/minor modification permitting element. Specifically relevant to this comment, these SIP-approved rules include provisions to prohibit the issuance of construction permits if the source at issue would result in a violation of any air quality standard. See Regulation 1200-03-09-.01(1)(e). III. Final Action With the exception of the preconstruction PSD permitting requirements for major sources of section 110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of (D)(i), and (J), and the interstate transport provisions pertaining to visibility of prong 4 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), EPA is taking final action to approve that Tennessee's March 13, 2014, SIP submission for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS because the submission is consistent with section 110 of the CAA. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described [[Page 3641]] in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 13, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: December 20, 2016. Heather McTeer Toney, Regional Administrator, Region 4. For the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart RR--Tennessee 0 2. Section 52.2220(e) is amended by adding a new entry ``110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour NO 2 NAAQS'' at the end of the table to read as follows: Sec. 52.2220 Identification of plan. * * * * * (e) * * * EPA-Approved Tennessee Non-Regulatory Provisions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of nonregulatory SIP Applicable geographic or State EPA approval provision nonattainment area effective date date Explanation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 110(a)(1) and (2) Tennessee................ 03/13/2014 1/12/2017, With the exception Infrastructure Requirements [Insert of sections: for the 2010 1-hour NO2 citation of 110(a)(2)(C) and (J) NAAQS. publication]. concerning PSD permitting requirements and; 110(a)(2)(D)(i) (prongs 1 through 4) concerning interstate transport requirements. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [FR Doc. 2017-00161 Filed 1-11-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 3639
country, the rule does not have tribal This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as Dated: December 20, 2016.
implications as specified by Executive defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Heather McTeer Toney,
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, Regional Administrator, Region 4.
2000), nor will it impose substantial petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law. Court of Appeals for the appropriate
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
circuit by March 13, 2017. Filing a
The Congressional Review Act, 5 PROMULGATION OF
petition for reconsideration by the
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Administrator of this final rule does not IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Business Regulatory Enforcement affect the finality of this action for the
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides purposes of judicial review nor does it ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
that before a rule may take effect, the extend the time within which a petition continues to read as follows:
agency promulgating the rule must for judicial review may be filed, and Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
submit a rule report, which includes a shall not postpone the effectiveness of
copy of the rule, to each House of the such rule or action. This action may not Subpart B—Alabama
Congress and to the Comptroller General be challenged later in proceedings to
of the United States. EPA will submit a enforce its requirements. See section ■ 2. Section 52.50(e) is amended by
report containing this action and other 307(b)(2). adding a new entry ‘‘110(a)(1) and (2)
required information to the U.S. Senate, Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 1-hour SO2 National Ambient Air
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
Environmental protection, Air Quality Standard’’ at the end of the table
the Comptroller General of the United
pollution control, Incorporation by to read as follows:
States prior to publication of the rule in
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
the Federal Register. A major rule Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and § 52.50 Identification of plan.
cannot take effect until 60 days after it recordkeeping requirements, Volatile * * * * *
is published in the Federal Register. organic compounds. (e) * * *
EPA-APPROVED ALABAMA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Applicable geo- State
Name of nonregulatory graphic or non- submittal date/ EPA approval date Explanation
SIP provision attainment area effective date
* * * * * * *
110(a)(1) and (2) Infra- Alabama ................. 4/23/2013 1/12/2017, [Insert Fed- With the exception of interstate transport require-
structure Requirements eral Register page ci- ments of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 4),
for the 2010 1-hour tation]. and the state board requirements of section
SO2 NAAQS. 110(a)(2)(E)(ii).
■ 3. Section 52.53 is amended by adding ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION enforcement of each NAAQS
paragraph (d) to read as follows: AGENCY promulgated by EPA, which is
commonly referred to as an
§ 52.53 Approval status. 40 CFR Part 52 ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP submission. TDEC
* * * * * certified that the Tennessee SIP contains
[EPA–R04–OAR–2015–0252; FRL–9957–90– provisions that ensure the 2010 NO2
(d) Disapproval. Submittal from the Region 4]
State of Alabama, through the Alabama NAAQS is implemented, enforced, and
Department of Environmental Air Plan Approval; TN Infrastructure maintained in Tennessee. EPA has
Management (ADEM) on April 23, 2013, Requirements for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS determined that portions of Tennessee’s
infrastructure SIP submission, provided
to address the Clean Air Act section AGENCY: Environmental Protection to EPA on March 13, 2014, satisfies the
110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for the 2010 1-hour Agency (EPA). certain required infrastructure elements
sulfur dioxide (SO2) National Ambient for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS.
ACTION: Final rule.
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
concerning state board requirements. SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection DATES:This rule will be effective
EPA is disapproving section Agency (EPA) is taking final action on February 13, 2017.
110(a)(2)(E)(ii) of ADEM’s submittal portions of the State Implementation ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
because the Alabama SIP lacks Plan (SIP) submission, submitted by the docket for this action under Docket
provisions respecting state boards per State of Tennessee, through the Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
section 128 of the CAA for the 2010 1- Tennessee Department of Environment 2015–0252. All documents in the docket
hour SO2 NAAQS. and Conservation (TDEC), on March 13, are listed on the www.regulations.gov
[FR Doc. 2017–00159 Filed 1–11–17; 8:45 am] 2014, to demonstrate that the State Web site. Although listed in the index,
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
meets the infrastructure requirements of some information is not publicly
the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) for the available, i.e., Confidential Business
2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2) national Information or other information whose
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). disclosure is restricted by statute.
The CAA requires that each state adopt Certain other material, such as
and submit a SIP for the copyrighted material, is not placed on
implementation, maintenance and the Internet and will be publicly
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Jan 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JAR1.SGM 12JAR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_3647/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 3641
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act direct costs on tribal governments or enforce its requirements. See section
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); preempt tribal law. 307(b)(2).
• does not have Federalism The Congressional Review Act, 5 List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
implications as specified in Executive U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Business Regulatory Enforcement Environmental protection, Air
1999); Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides pollution control, Incorporation by
that before a rule may take effect, the reference, Intergovernmental relations,
• is not an economically significant
agency promulgating the rule must Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
regulatory action based on health or
submit a rule report, which includes a recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
safety risks subject to Executive Order
copy of the rule, to each House of the organic compounds.
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
Congress and to the Comptroller General Dated: December 20, 2016.
• is not a significant regulatory action
of the United States. EPA will submit a Heather McTeer Toney,
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
report containing this action and other Regional Administrator, Region 4.
28355, May 22, 2001);
required information to the U.S. Senate,
• is not subject to requirements of the U.S. House of Representatives, and For the reasons stated in the
Section 12(d) of the National the Comptroller General of the United preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
Technology Transfer and Advancement States prior to publication of the rule in follows:
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because the Federal Register. A major rule
application of those requirements would cannot take effect until 60 days after it PART 52—APPROVAL AND
be inconsistent with the CAA; and is published in the Federal Register. PROMULGATION OF
• does not provide EPA with the This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
discretionary authority to address, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
appropriate, disproportionate human Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, continues to read as follows:
health or environmental effects, using petitions for judicial review of this
practicable and legally permissible action must be filed in the United States Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
methods, under Executive Order 12898 Court of Appeals for the appropriate
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Subpart RR—Tennessee
circuit by March 13, 2017. Filing a
The SIP is not approved to apply on petition for reconsideration by the ■ 2. Section 52.2220(e) is amended by
any Indian reservation land or in any Administrator of this final rule does not adding a new entry ‘‘110(a)(1) and (2)
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe affect the finality of this action for the Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010
has demonstrated that a tribe has purposes of judicial review nor does it 1-hour NO2 NAAQS’’ at the end of the
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian extend the time within which a petition table to read as follows:
country, the rule does not have tribal for judicial review may be filed, and
implications as specified by Executive shall not postpone the effectiveness of § 52.2220 Identification of plan.
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, such rule or action. This action may not * * * * *
2000), nor will it impose substantial be challenged later in proceedings to (e) * * *
EPA-APPROVED TENNESSEE NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Applicable
Name of nonregulatory geographic or State effective EPA approval date Explanation
SIP provision nonattainment date
area
* * * * * * *
110(a)(1) and (2) Infra- Tennessee ............. 03/13/2014 1/12/2017, [Insert cita- With the exception of sections:
structure Requirements tion of publication]. 110(a)(2)(C) and (J) concerning PSD permitting
for the 2010 1-hour requirements and;
NO2 NAAQS. 110(a)(2)(D)(i) (prongs 1 through 4) concerning
interstate transport requirements.
[FR Doc. 2017–00161 Filed 1–11–17; 8:45 am] ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SUMMARY: EPA is establishing reporting
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P AGENCY and recordkeeping requirements for
certain chemical substances when they
40 CFR Part 704 are manufactured or processed at the
nanoscale as described in this rule.
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0572; FRL–9957–81]
Specifically, EPA is requiring persons
RIN 2070–AJ54 that manufacture (defined by statute to
include import) or process, or intend to
Chemical Substances When manufacture or process these chemical
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Manufactured or Processed as substances to electronically report to
Nanoscale Materials; TSCA Reporting EPA certain information, which
and Recordkeeping Requirements includes insofar as known to or
AGENCY: Environmental Protection reasonably ascertainable by the person
Agency (EPA). making the report, the specific chemical
identity, production volume, methods of
ACTION: Final rule.
manufacture and processing, exposure
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Jan 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JAR1.SGM 12JAR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_3647/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-03-21 14:40:19
Document Modified: 2017-03-21 14:40:19
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule will be effective February 13, 2017. | |
| Contact | Richard Wong, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Wong can be reached via electronic mail at [email protected] or via telephone at (404) 562-8726. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 3639 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR