82_FR_36885 82 FR 36735 - Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

82 FR 36735 - Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 150 (August 7, 2017)

Page Range36735-36736
FR Document2017-16501

The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from India. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. The Department preliminarily determines that Jindal Poly Films Limited of India did, but that SRF Limited did not, make sales of subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the POR. The preliminary results are listed below in the section titled ``Preliminary Results of Review.'' Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 150 (Monday, August 7, 2017) 
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 150 (Monday, August 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36735-36736]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16501]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-824]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: 
Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on 
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from 
India. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2015, through June 30, 
2016. The Department preliminarily determines that Jindal Poly Films 
Limited of India did, but that SRF Limited did not, make sales of 
subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the POR. 
The preliminary results are listed below in the section titled 
``Preliminary Results of Review.'' Interested parties are invited to 
comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable August 7, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith; AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by this order are all gauges of raw, 
pretreated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet and strip, 
whether extruded or coextruded. Excluded are metallized films and other 
finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by 
the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer 
of more than 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of PET film are classifiable 
in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under 
item number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the scope 
of the order is dispositive.

Background

    DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film Inc., and SKC, Inc. 
(the petitioners) requested reviews of Ester Industries Limited 
(Ester), Garware Polyester Ltd. (Garware), Polyplex Corporation Ltd. 
(Polyplex Ltd.), SRF Limited (SRF), Jindal Poly Films Limited of lndia 
(Jindal),\1\ and Vacmet.\2\ Polyplex USA and Flex USA requested reviews 
of SRF, Jindal, Garware, Ester, MTZ Polyesters Ltd. (MTZ), Vacmet India 
Limited, Uflex Ltd. and Polyplex Ltd.\3\ Jindal and SRF each self-
requested.\4\ Based on these timely requests, the Department initiated 
a review of ten companies in this proceeding.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On May 23, 2017, the Department sent Jindal Poly Films Ltd. 
(India) a supplemental questionnaire requesting clarification of its 
name. See Department Letter re: Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India)'s 
Name, dated May 23, 2017. Based on Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India)'s 
response, we have determined that it is the same company as Jindal 
Poly Films of India. See Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India)'s May 25, 
2017 Response. Accordingly, Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India) and 
Jindal Poly Films of India will be referred to as ``Jindal'' for the 
remainder of this notice.
    \2\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) 
Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Request for Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review,'' dated August 1, 2016.
    \3\ See Polyplex USA and Flex USA's Letter, ``Request for 
Administrative Review,'' dated July 29, 2016.
    \4\ See Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India)'s Letter, ``Polyethylene 
Terephthalate (PET) Film from India: Requests for Administrative 
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty 
Order,'' dated July 29, 2016; see also SRF Limited of India's 
Letter, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from India/Request 
for Antidumping Admin Review/SRF Limited,'' dated July 30, 2016; see 
also SRF's Letter, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from 
India/Withdrawal of Request for Antidumping Admin Review/SRF 
Limited,'' dated December 9, 2016.
    \5\ These companies were Ester, Garware, Jindal Poly Films 
Limited of India, Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India), MTZ, Polyplex 
Corporation, SRF, Uflex Ltd., Vacmet, and Vacmet India Limited. See 
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Reviews, 81 FR 62720, (September 12, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 2, 2016, the Department selected Jindal and SRF as 
mandatory respondents.\6\ On December 9, 2016, Jindal and SRF each 
separately withdrew their self-requests for review.\7\ On December 12, 
2016, the petitioners withdrew their requests for Ester, Garware, 
Polyplex and Vacmet.\8\ Also on December 12, 2016, Polyplex USA and 
Flex USA withdrew their requests for SRF, Jindal, Garware, Ester, MTZ, 
Vacmet India Limited, Uflex Ltd., and Polyplex Corporation.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Administrative Review of the Antidumping 
Duty Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from 
India: Selection of Respondents for Individual Examination,'' dated 
November 2, 2016.
    \7\ See Jindal's Letter, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film 
from India: Withdrawal of Requests for Administrative Review of the 
Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order,'' dated 
December 9, 2016; see also SRF's Letter, ``Polyethylene 
Terephthalate (PET) Film from India/Withdrawal of Request for 
Antidumping Admin Review/SRF Limited,'' dated December 9, 2016.
    \8\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) 
Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Withdrawal of Request for 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated December 12, 2016.
    \9\ See Polyplex's Letter, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) 
Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Request for Withdrawal of 
Administrative Review,'' dated December 12, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Partial Rescission of Administrative Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), based on the timely withdrawal of 
the requests for review, we are rescinding this administrative review 
with respect to the following companies named in the Initiation Notice: 
Ester, Garware, MTZ, Polyplex Ltd., Uflex Ltd., Vacmet, and Vacmet 
India Limited.

Methodology

    The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price 
is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is 
calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
    For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of topics 
discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an 
Appendix to this notice.
    The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on 
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov/login.aspx and it is available to all parties in the Central Records 
Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic 
versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in 
content.

Preliminary Results of Review

    As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the 
following weighted-average dumping margins for

[[Page 36736]]

the period July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Initiation Notice also lists the company as Jindal Poly 
Films Ltd. (India). As noted in Decision Memoranda, dated 
concurrently with this notice, the Department has determined that 
Jindal Poly Films Limited of India is the same company as Jindal 
Poly Films Ltd. (India).

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Manufacturer/exporter                       dumping
                                                                margins
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jindal Poly Films Limited of India \10\.....................        2.34
SRF Limited.................................................        0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    The Department will disclose to interested parties the calculations 
performed in connection with these preliminary results within five days 
of the date of publication of this notice.\11\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases briefs no later than 30 
days after the date of publication of this notice.\12\ Rebuttal briefs, 
limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later 
than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\13\ Parties who 
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged 
to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief 
summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\14\ Case and 
rebuttal briefs should be filed using the Department's electronic 
filing system, ACCESS.\15\ In order to be properly filed, ACCESS must 
successfully receive an electronically-filed document in its entirety 
by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
    \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii).
    \13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
    \14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
    \15\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via 
ACCESS, within 30 days after the date of publication of this 
notice.\16\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and 
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of 
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to 
those raised in the respective case briefs. If a request for a hearing 
is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing 
to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
    \17\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department will issue the results of this administrative 
review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in 
any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, unless that time is extended.

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall 
determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1). We will instruct CBP to liquidate entries of merchandise 
produced and/or exported by respondent companies. We intend to issue 
instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the 
results of this review.
    For the individually examined respondents Jindal and SRF, if the 
weighted-average dumping margins are not zero or de minimis (i.e., less 
than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will 
calculate importer-specific (or customer-specific) ad valorem 
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of 
dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total 
entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 
However, where the respondent did not report the entered value for its 
sales, we will calculate importer-specific (or customer-specific) per-
unit duty assessment rates. Where a respondent's weighted-average 
dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific 
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of PET Film from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the company 
under review will be the rate established in the final results of this 
review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 
percent, no cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously reviewed 
or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent 
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a 
prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation, but the 
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for 
the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) 
if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this 
or any previous review, the cash deposit rate will be the all others 
rate for this proceeding, 5.71 percent. These deposit requirements, 
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing 
duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. 
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's 
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or 
countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled 
antidumping duties.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1) 
and 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: July 31, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum

1. Summary
2. Background
3. Partial Rescission
4. Scope of the Order
5. Comparisons to Normal Value
6. Product Comparisons
7. Date of Sale
8. Export Price
9. Normal Value
10. Currency Conversion
11. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2017-16501 Filed 8-4-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 150 / Monday, August 7, 2017 / Notices 36735 Dated: August 1, 2017 convenience and customs purposes. The On December 12, 2016, the petitioners James Maeder, written description of the scope of the withdrew their requests for Ester, Senior Director performing the duties of order is dispositive. Garware, Polyplex and Vacmet.8 Also Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping on December 12, 2016, Polyplex USA and Countervailing Duty Operations. Background and Flex USA withdrew their requests [FR Doc. 2017–16572 Filed 8–4–17; 8:45 am] DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi for SRF, Jindal, Garware, Ester, MTZ, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Polyester Film Inc., and SKC, Inc. (the Vacmet India Limited, Uflex Ltd., and petitioners) requested reviews of Ester Polyplex Corporation.9 Industries Limited (Ester), Garware DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Polyester Ltd. (Garware), Polyplex Partial Rescission of Administrative Corporation Ltd. (Polyplex Ltd.), SRF Review International Trade Administration Limited (SRF), Jindal Poly Films Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Limited of lndia (Jindal),1 and Vacmet.2 based on the timely withdrawal of the [A–533–824] Polyplex USA and Flex USA requested requests for review, we are rescinding Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, reviews of SRF, Jindal, Garware, Ester, this administrative review with respect Sheet, and Strip From India: MTZ Polyesters Ltd. (MTZ), Vacmet to the following companies named in Preliminary Results and Partial India Limited, Uflex Ltd. and Polyplex the Initiation Notice: Ester, Garware, Rescission of Antidumping Duty Ltd.3 Jindal and SRF each self- MTZ, Polyplex Ltd., Uflex Ltd., Vacmet, Administrative Review; 2015–2016 requested.4 Based on these timely and Vacmet India Limited. requests, the Department initiated a AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, review of ten companies in this Methodology International Trade Administration, proceeding.5 The Department is conducting this U.S. Department of Commerce. On November 2, 2016, the Department review in accordance with section SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce selected Jindal and SRF as mandatory respondents.6 On December 9, 2016, 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as (the Department) is conducting an amended (the Act). Export price is administrative review of the Jindal and SRF each separately withdrew their self-requests for review.7 calculated in accordance with section antidumping duty (AD) order on 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, accordance with section 773 of the Act. 1 On May 23, 2017, the Department sent Jindal and strip (PET Film) from India. The Poly Films Ltd. (India) a supplemental For a full description of the period of review (POR) is July 1, 2015, questionnaire requesting clarification of its name. methodology underlying our through June 30, 2016. The Department See Department Letter re: Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India)’s Name, dated May 23, 2017. Based on Jindal conclusions, see the Preliminary preliminarily determines that Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India)’s response, we have Decision Memorandum. A list of topics Poly Films Limited of India did, but that determined that it is the same company as Jindal discussed in the Preliminary Decision SRF Limited did not, make sales of Poly Films of India. See Jindal Poly Films Ltd. Memorandum is attached as an subject merchandise at prices below (India)’s May 25, 2017 Response. Accordingly, Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India) and Jindal Poly Films Appendix to this notice. normal value (NV) during the POR. The preliminary results are listed below in of India will be referred to as ‘‘Jindal’’ for the The Preliminary Decision remainder of this notice. Memorandum is a public document and the section titled ‘‘Preliminary Results 2 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene of Review.’’ Interested parties are Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from is on file electronically via Enforcement invited to comment on these India: Request for Antidumping Duty and Compliance’s Antidumping and preliminary results. Administrative Review,’’ dated August 1, 2016. Countervailing Duty Centralized 3 See Polyplex USA and Flex USA’s Letter, Electronic Service System (ACCESS). DATES: Applicable August 7, 2017. ‘‘Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated July 29, 2016. ACCESS is available to registered users FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 4 See Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India)’s Letter, at https://access.trade.gov/login.aspx Jacqueline Arrowsmith; AD/CVD ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from India: and it is available to all parties in the Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Requests for Administrative Review of the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of Compliance, International Trade Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order,’’ dated July 29, 2016; see also SRF Limited the main Department of Commerce Administration, U.S. Department of of India’s Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) building. In addition, a complete Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Film from India/Request for Antidumping Admin version of the Preliminary Decision NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: Review/SRF Limited,’’ dated July 30, 2016; see also Memorandum can be accessed directly (202) 482–5255. SRF’s Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from India/Withdrawal of Request for on the Internet at http:// SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Antidumping Admin Review/SRF Limited,’’ dated enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed December 9, 2016. Preliminary Decision Memorandum and Scope of the Order 5 These companies were Ester, Garware, Jindal Poly Films Limited of India, Jindal Poly Films Ltd. the electronic versions of the The products covered by this order (India), MTZ, Polyplex Corporation, SRF, Uflex Preliminary Decision Memorandum are are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or Ltd., Vacmet, and Vacmet India Limited. See identical in content. primed polyethylene terephthalate film, Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty sheet and strip, whether extruded or Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 62720, (September Preliminary Results of Review 12, 2016) (Initiation Notice). coextruded. Excluded are metallized 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of As a result of this review, we films and other finished films that have the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene preliminarily determine the following had at least one of their surfaces Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: weighted-average dumping margins for modified by the application of a Selection of Respondents for Individual mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Examination,’’ dated November 2, 2016. performance-enhancing resinous or 7 See Jindal’s Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate 8 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 (PET) Film from India: Withdrawal of Requests for Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from inches thick. Imports of PET film are Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty India: Withdrawal of Request for Antidumping Duty classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Order and Countervailing Duty Order,’’ dated Administrative Review,’’ dated December 12, 2016. December 9, 2016; see also SRF’s Letter, 9 See Polyplex’s Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from India/ Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from under item number 3920.62.00.90. Withdrawal of Request for Antidumping Admin India: Request for Withdrawal of Administrative HTSUS subheadings are provided for Review/SRF Limited,’’ dated December 9, 2016. Review,’’ dated December 12, 2016. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Aug 04, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM 07AUN1

36736 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 150 / Monday, August 7, 2017 / Notices the period July 1, 2015, through June 30, Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, deposit rate will continue to be the 2016. DC 20230.17 company-specific rate published for the The Department will issue the results most recent period; (3) if the exporter is Weighted- of this administrative review, including not a firm covered in this review, a prior average the results of its analysis of the issues review, or the less-than-fair-value Manufacturer/exporter dumping raised in any written briefs, not later margins investigation, but the manufacturer is, (percent) than 120 days after the date of the cash deposit rate will be the rate publication of this notice in the Federal established for the most recent period Jindal Poly Films Limited of Register, pursuant to section for the manufacturer of the India 10 ..................................... 2.34 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, unless that time merchandise; and (4) if neither the SRF Limited ................................ 0.00 is extended. exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm Assessment Rates covered in this or any previous review, Disclosure and Public Comment Upon completion of the the cash deposit rate will be the all The Department will disclose to administrative review, the Department others rate for this proceeding, 5.71 interested parties the calculations shall determine, and U.S. Customs and percent. These deposit requirements, performed in connection with these Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, when imposed, shall remain in effect preliminary results within five days of antidumping duties on all appropriate until further notice. the date of publication of this notice.11 entries in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will instruct CBP to Notification to Interested Parties Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases liquidate entries of merchandise This notice also serves as a briefs no later than 30 days after the produced and/or exported by preliminary reminder to importers of date of publication of this notice.12 respondent companies. We intend to their responsibility under 19 CFR Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised issue instructions to CBP 15 days after 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate in the case briefs, may be filed not later the date of publication of the results of this review. regarding the reimbursement of than five days after the date for filing antidumping duties and/or For the individually examined case briefs.13 Parties who submit case countervailing duties prior to respondents Jindal and SRF, if the briefs or rebuttal briefs in this weighted-average dumping margins are liquidation of the relevant entries proceeding are encouraged to submit not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 during this POR. Failure to comply with with each argument: (1) A statement of percent) in the final results of this this requirement could result in the the issue; (2) a brief summary of the review, we will calculate importer- Secretary’s presumption that argument; and (3) a table of specific (or customer-specific) ad reimbursement of antidumping duties authorities.14 Case and rebuttal briefs valorem assessment rates on the basis of and/or countervailing duties occurred should be filed using the Department’s the ratio of the total amount of dumping and the subsequent assessment of electronic filing system, ACCESS.15 In calculated for the importer’s examined doubled antidumping duties. order to be properly filed, ACCESS must sales and the total entered value of the successfully receive an electronically- We are issuing and publishing these sales in accordance with 19 CFR results in accordance with sections filed document in its entirety by 5:00 351.212(b)(1). However, where the p.m. Eastern Time. 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 respondent did not report the entered CFR 351.213(h)(1) and 351.221(b)(4). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), value for its sales, we will calculate interested parties who wish to request a importer-specific (or customer-specific) Dated: July 31, 2017. hearing must submit a written request to per-unit duty assessment rates. Where a Gary Taverman, the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement respondent’s weighted-average dumping Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Compliance, filed electronically via margin is zero or de minimis, or an and Countervailing Duty Operations, ACCESS, within 30 days after the date importer-specific assessment rate is zero performing the non-exclusive functions and of publication of this notice.16 Requests or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to duties of the Assistant Secretary for should contain: (1) The party’s name, liquidate the appropriate entries Enforcement and Compliance. address, and telephone number; (2) the without regard to antidumping duties. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in number of participants; and (3) a list of Cash Deposit Requirements the Preliminary Decision Memorandum issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those The following cash deposit 1. Summary raised in the respective case briefs. If a requirements will be effective for all 2. Background request for a hearing is made, parties shipments of PET Film from India 3. Partial Rescission will be notified of the time and date for entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 4. Scope of the Order the hearing to be held at the U.S. for consumption on or after the date of 5. Comparisons to Normal Value Department of Commerce, 1401 publication of the final results of this 6. Product Comparisons administrative review, as provided for 7. Date of Sale 10 The Initiation Notice also lists the company as by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 8. Export Price Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India). As noted in Decision The cash deposit rate for the company 9. Normal Value Memoranda, dated concurrently with this notice, under review will be the rate 10. Currency Conversion the Department has determined that Jindal Poly established in the final results of this 11. Recommendation mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Films Limited of India is the same company as review (except, if the rate is zero or de Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India). [FR Doc. 2017–16501 Filed 8–4–17; 8:45 am] 11 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, no BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 12 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). cash deposit will be required); (2) for 13 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). previously reviewed or investigated 14 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). companies not listed above, the cash 15 See 19 CFR 351.303. 16 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 17 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Aug 04, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM 07AUN1


Document Created: 2017-08-05 03:00:12
Document Modified: 2017-08-05 03:00:12
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable August 7, 2017.
ContactJacqueline Arrowsmith; AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5255.
FR Citation82 FR 36735 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR