82_FR_37176 82 FR 37025 - Air Plan Approvals, Idaho: Logan Utah/Idaho PM2.5

82 FR 37025 - Air Plan Approvals, Idaho: Logan Utah/Idaho PM2.5

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 151 (August 8, 2017)

Page Range37025-37027
FR Document2017-16614

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving revisions to Idaho's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted in 2012 and 2014 to address Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for the Idaho portion of the Logan, Utah-Idaho fine particulate matter (PM<INF>2.5</INF>) nonattainment area (Logan UT-ID area). Based on newly available air quality monitoring data, the EPA is approving Idaho's attainment demonstration and approving Idaho's 2014 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) as early progress budgets. Additionally, the EPA is conditionally approving Reasonable Further Progress (RFP), Quantitative Milestones (QMs), and revised MVEBs for the Idaho portion of the nonattainment area, based on Idaho's commitment to adopt and submit updates to these attainment plan elements within one year of the effective date of this final action.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 151 (Tuesday, August 8, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 8, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37025-37027]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R10-OAR-2015-0067; FRL-9965-67-Region 10]


Air Plan Approvals, Idaho: Logan Utah/Idaho PM2.5 Nonattainment 
Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving 
revisions to Idaho's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted in 2012 
and 2014 to address Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for the Idaho 
portion of the Logan, Utah-Idaho fine particulate matter 
(PM2.5) nonattainment area (Logan UT-ID area). Based on 
newly available air quality monitoring data, the EPA is approving 
Idaho's attainment demonstration and approving Idaho's 2014 Motor 
Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) as early progress budgets. 
Additionally, the EPA is conditionally approving Reasonable Further 
Progress (RFP), Quantitative Milestones (QMs), and revised MVEBs for 
the Idaho portion of the nonattainment area, based on Idaho's 
commitment to adopt and submit updates to these attainment plan 
elements within one year of the effective date of this final action.

DATES: This final rule is effective September 7, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2015-0067. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in 
the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e., 
Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure 
of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and is publicly 
available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials 
are available at http://www.regulations.gov or at EPA Region 10, Office 
of Air and Waste, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. The EPA 
requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional 
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 
4:30, excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt, Air Planning Unit, Office 
of Air and Waste (OAW-150), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 
1200 Sixth Ave., Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101; telephone number: (206) 
553-0256; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review

I. Background Information

    On June 1, 2017, the EPA proposed to approve Idaho's attainment 
demonstration and 2014 MVEBs as early progress budgets (82 FR 25208). 
As part of the same action, the EPA also proposed to conditionally 
approve RFP, QMs, and revised MVEBs for the Idaho portion of the 
nonattainment area. An explanation of the CAA requirements, a detailed 
analysis of the submittals, and the EPA's reasons for proposing 
approval were provided in the notice of proposed rulemaking, and will 
not be restated here. The public comment period for the proposal ended 
July 3, 2017. We received no comments.

II. Final Action

    For the reasons set forth in the proposed rulemaking for this 
action, the EPA is approving the attainment demonstration in Idaho's 
2012 and 2014 revisions to the SIP (Idaho attainment plan) for the 
Idaho portion of the Logan UT-ID area. The EPA is also approving the 
2014 MVEBs as early progress budgets, in that they are consistent with 
making progress toward attainment of the 24-hour 2006 PM2.5 
National Ambient Air Quality Standards by December 31, 2015. Lastly, 
the EPA is conditionally approving RFP, QMs, and revised MVEBs in the 
Idaho attainment

[[Page 37026]]

plan, based on Idaho's April 25, 2017 commitment to adopt and submit 
updated plan elements to meet these requirements. Under a conditional 
approval, the State must adopt and submit the specific revisions it has 
committed to by a date certain but not later than one year of this 
final action.\1\ If the EPA fully approves the submittal of the 
revisions specified in the commitment letter, the conditional nature of 
the approval would be removed and the submittal would become fully 
approved. If the State does not submit these revisions by the date 
specified in the April 25, 2017 commitment letter, or if the EPA finds 
the State's revisions to be incomplete, or EPA disapproves the State's 
revisions, a conditional approval will convert to a disapproval. If any 
of these occur and the EPA's conditional approval converts to a 
disapproval, that will constitute a disapproval of a required plan 
element under part D of title I of the Act, which starts an 18-month 
clock for sanctions, see section 179(a)(2), and the two-year clock for 
a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP), see CAA section 110(c)(1)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In IDEQ's April 25, 2017 commitment letter, IDEQ committed 
to submit revisions by August 1, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or 
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible 
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land in 
Idaho and is also not approved to apply in any other area where the EPA 
or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In 
those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal 
implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 
November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by October 10, 2017. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: July 24, 2017.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart N--Idaho

0
2. In Sec.  52.670, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an 
additional entry at the end of the table for ``Fine Particulate Matter 
Attainment Plan.''
    The addition reads as follows:


Sec.  52.670  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

[[Page 37027]]



                    EPA-Approved Idaho Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Applicable
     Name of SIP provision          geographic or         State       EPA approval date          Comments
                                 nonattainment area  submittal date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Fine Particulate Matter          Franklin County,    12/19/2012; 12/ 8/8/2017, [Insert   Approved: moderate area
 Attainment Plan.                 Logan UT-ID PM2.5         24/2014   Federal Register    attainment
                                  Nonattainment                       citation].          demonstration and 2014
                                  Area.                                                   reasonable further
                                                                                          progress motor vehicle
                                                                                          emissions budgets.
                                                                                          Conditional Approval:
                                                                                          reasonable further
                                                                                          progress, quantitative
                                                                                          milestone, motor
                                                                                          vehicle emission
                                                                                          budget requirements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-16614 Filed 8-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                                       Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                                      37025

                                                                       EPA-APPROVED NEVADA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
                                                                                                            Applicable                                            EPA
                                                                                                          geographic or            State submittal
                                                              Name of SIP provision                                                                             approval                       Explanation
                                                                                                          nonattainment                 date                      date
                                                                                                              area

                                                                                                       Air Quality Implementation Plan for the State of Nevada 1


                                                           *                   *                               *                          *                        *                      *                  *
                                                  Nevada Regional Haze State Implemen-                 State-wide ..............          11/18/09        77 FR 50936 (8/23/     Excluding Appendix A (‘‘Nevada BART
                                                    tation Plan (October 2009), excluding                                                                   12).                   Regulation’’). The Nevada BART reg-
                                                    the BART determination for NOX at                                                                                              ulation, including NAC 445B.029,
                                                    Reid Gardner Generating Station in                                                                                             445B.22095, and 445B.22096, is list-
                                                    sections 5.5.3, 5.6.3 and 7.2, which                                                                                           ed above in 40 CFR 52.1470(c).
                                                    the EPA has disapproved.
                                                  Nevada Regional Haze Plan 5-Year                     State-wide ..............       11/18/2014         [Insert Federal
                                                    Progress Report.                                                                                         Register cita-
                                                                                                                                                             tion], 8/8/2017.

                                                              *                       *                          *                        *                          *                     *                  *
                                                      1 The
                                                          organization of this table generally follows from the organization of the State of Nevada’s original 1972 SIP, which was divided into 12
                                                  sections. Nonattainment and maintenance plans, among other types of plans, are listed under Section 5 (Control Strategy). Lead SIPs and Small
                                                  Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance SIPs are listed after Section 12 followed by nonregulatory or
                                                  quasi-regulatory statutory provisions approved into the SIP. Regulatory statutory provisions are listed in 40 CFR 52.1470(c).


                                                  ■ 3. Section 52.1488 is amended by                          progress budgets. Additionally, the EPA                      98101; telephone number: (206) 553–
                                                  adding paragraph (g) to read as follows:                    is conditionally approving Reasonable                        0256; email address: hunt.jeff@epa.gov.
                                                                                                              Further Progress (RFP), Quantitative                         SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                  § 52.1488       Visibility protection.
                                                                                                              Milestones (QMs), and revised MVEBs
                                                  *     *     *     *    *                                    for the Idaho portion of the                                 Table of Contents
                                                    (g) Approval. On November 18, 2014,                       nonattainment area, based on Idaho’s                         I. Background Information
                                                  the Nevada Division of Environmental                        commitment to adopt and submit                               II. Final Action
                                                  Protection submitted the ‘‘Nevada                           updates to these attainment plan                             III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
                                                  Regional Haze Plan 5-Year Progress                          elements within one year of the effective
                                                  Report’’ (‘‘Progress Report’’). The                                                                                      I. Background Information
                                                                                                              date of this final action.
                                                  Progress Report meets the requirements                                                                                     On June 1, 2017, the EPA proposed to
                                                  of the Regional Haze Rule in 40 CFR                         DATES: This final rule is effective
                                                                                                              September 7, 2017.                                           approve Idaho’s attainment
                                                  51.308.                                                                                                                  demonstration and 2014 MVEBs as early
                                                  [FR Doc. 2017–16491 Filed 8–7–17; 8:45 am]                  ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a                         progress budgets (82 FR 25208). As part
                                                  BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                                                                              docket for this action under Docket ID                       of the same action, the EPA also
                                                                                                              No. EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0067. All                               proposed to conditionally approve RFP,
                                                                                                              documents in the docket are listed on                        QMs, and revised MVEBs for the Idaho
                                                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                                    the http://www.regulations.gov Web                           portion of the nonattainment area. An
                                                  AGENCY                                                      site. Although listed in the index, some                     explanation of the CAA requirements, a
                                                                                                              information may not be publicly                              detailed analysis of the submittals, and
                                                  40 CFR Part 52                                              available, i.e., Confidential Business                       the EPA’s reasons for proposing
                                                  [EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0067; FRL–9965–67–                        Information or other information the                         approval were provided in the notice of
                                                  Region 10]                                                  disclosure of which is restricted by                         proposed rulemaking, and will not be
                                                                                                              statute. Certain other material, such as                     restated here. The public comment
                                                  Air Plan Approvals, Idaho: Logan Utah/                      copyrighted material, is not placed on                       period for the proposal ended July 3,
                                                  Idaho PM2.5 Nonattainment Area                              the Internet and is publicly available                       2017. We received no comments.
                                                                                                              only in hard copy form. Publicly
                                                  AGENCY:  Environmental Protection                                                                                        II. Final Action
                                                                                                              available docket materials are available
                                                  Agency (EPA).
                                                                                                              at http://www.regulations.gov or at EPA                        For the reasons set forth in the
                                                  ACTION: Final rule.                                         Region 10, Office of Air and Waste, 1200                     proposed rulemaking for this action, the
                                                  SUMMARY:   The Environmental Protection                     Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington                            EPA is approving the attainment
                                                  Agency (EPA) is approving revisions to                      98101. The EPA requests that you                             demonstration in Idaho’s 2012 and 2014
                                                  Idaho’s State Implementation Plan (SIP)                     contact the person listed in the FOR                         revisions to the SIP (Idaho attainment
                                                  submitted in 2012 and 2014 to address                       FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to                       plan) for the Idaho portion of the Logan
                                                  Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for                        schedule your inspection. The Regional                       UT–ID area. The EPA is also approving
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES




                                                  the Idaho portion of the Logan, Utah-                       Office’s official hours of business are                      the 2014 MVEBs as early progress
                                                  Idaho fine particulate matter (PM2.5)                       Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,                         budgets, in that they are consistent with
                                                  nonattainment area (Logan UT–ID area).                      excluding Federal holidays.                                  making progress toward attainment of
                                                  Based on newly available air quality                        FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff                        the 24-hour 2006 PM2.5 National
                                                  monitoring data, the EPA is approving                       Hunt, Air Planning Unit, Office of Air                       Ambient Air Quality Standards by
                                                  Idaho’s attainment demonstration and                        and Waste (OAW–150), Environmental                           December 31, 2015. Lastly, the EPA is
                                                  approving Idaho’s 2014 Motor Vehicle                        Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200                           conditionally approving RFP, QMs, and
                                                  Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) as early                          Sixth Ave., Suite 900, Seattle, WA                           revised MVEBs in the Idaho attainment


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014     16:34 Aug 07, 2017   Jkt 241001    PO 00000     Frm 00035     Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700    E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM    08AUR1


                                                  37026             Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

                                                  plan, based on Idaho’s April 25, 2017                      • is certified as not having a                     publication of the rule in the Federal
                                                  commitment to adopt and submit                          significant economic impact on a                      Register. A major rule cannot take effect
                                                  updated plan elements to meet these                     substantial number of small entities                  until 60 days after it is published in the
                                                  requirements. Under a conditional                       under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5               Federal Register. This action is not a
                                                  approval, the State must adopt and                      U.S.C. 601 et seq.);                                  ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
                                                  submit the specific revisions it has                       • does not contain any unfunded                    804(2).
                                                  committed to by a date certain but not                  mandate or significantly or uniquely                     Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
                                                  later than one year of this final action.1              affect small governments, as described                petitions for judicial review of this
                                                  If the EPA fully approves the submittal                 in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                   action must be filed in the United States
                                                  of the revisions specified in the                       of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);                              Court of Appeals for the appropriate
                                                  commitment letter, the conditional                         • does not have Federalism                         circuit by October 10, 2017. Filing a
                                                  nature of the approval would be                         implications as specified in Executive                petition for reconsideration by the
                                                  removed and the submittal would                         Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,                  Administrator of this final rule does not
                                                  become fully approved. If the State does                1999);                                                affect the finality of this action for the
                                                  not submit these revisions by the date                     • is not an economically significant               purposes of judicial review nor does it
                                                  specified in the April 25, 2017                         regulatory action based on health or                  extend the time within which a petition
                                                  commitment letter, or if the EPA finds                  safety risks subject to Executive Order               for judicial review may be filed, and
                                                  the State’s revisions to be incomplete, or              13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);                  shall not postpone the effectiveness of
                                                  EPA disapproves the State’s revisions, a                   • is not a significant regulatory action           such rule or action. This action may not
                                                  conditional approval will convert to a                  subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR               be challenged later in proceedings to
                                                  disapproval. If any of these occur and                  28355, May 22, 2001);                                 enforce its requirements. (See section
                                                  the EPA’s conditional approval converts                    • is not subject to requirements of                307(b)(2)).
                                                  to a disapproval, that will constitute a                Section 12(d) of the National
                                                  disapproval of a required plan element                  Technology Transfer and Advancement                   List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
                                                  under part D of title I of the Act, which               Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because                Environmental protection, Air
                                                  starts an 18-month clock for sanctions,                 this action does not involve technical                pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
                                                  see section 179(a)(2), and the two-year                 standards; and                                        Incorporation by reference,
                                                  clock for a Federal Implementation Plan                    • does not provide the EPA with the                Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
                                                  (FIP), see CAA section 110(c)(1)(B).                    discretionary authority to address, as                Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
                                                  III. Statutory and Executive Orders                     appropriate, disproportionate human                   matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
                                                  Review                                                  health or environmental effects, using                requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
                                                                                                          practicable and legally permissible                   organic compounds.
                                                     Under the CAA, the Administrator is                  methods, under Executive Order 12898
                                                  required to approve a SIP submission                    (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).                       Dated: July 24, 2017.
                                                  that complies with the provisions of the                   The SIP is not approved to apply on                Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
                                                  Act and applicable Federal regulations.                 any Indian reservation land in Idaho                  Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
                                                  42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).                     and is also not approved to apply in any                For the reasons set forth in the
                                                  Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the                 other area where the EPA or an Indian                 preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
                                                  EPA’s role is to approve state choices,                 tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has               follows:
                                                  provided that they meet the criteria of                 jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
                                                  the CAA. Accordingly, this action                       country, the rule does not have tribal                PART 52—APPROVAL AND
                                                  merely approves state law as meeting                    implications as specified by Executive                PROMULGATION OF
                                                  Federal requirements and does not                       Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,                 IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
                                                  impose additional requirements beyond                   2000).
                                                  those imposed by state law. For that                       The Congressional Review Act, 5                    ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
                                                  reason, this action:                                    U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small             continues to read as follows:
                                                     • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory                  Business Regulatory Enforcement
                                                  action’’ subject to review by the Office                                                                          Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
                                                                                                          Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
                                                  of Management and Budget under                          that before a rule may take effect, the               Subpart N—Idaho
                                                  Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
                                                                                                          agency promulgating the rule must
                                                  October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,                                                                         2. In § 52.670, the table in paragraph
                                                                                                          submit a rule report, which includes a                ■
                                                  January 21, 2011);                                                                                            (e) is amended by adding an additional
                                                                                                          copy of the rule, to each House of the
                                                     • does not impose an information
                                                                                                          Congress and to the Comptroller General               entry at the end of the table for ‘‘Fine
                                                  collection burden under the provisions
                                                                                                          of the United States. The EPA will                    Particulate Matter Attainment Plan.’’
                                                  of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
                                                                                                          submit a report containing this action                   The addition reads as follows:
                                                  U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
                                                                                                          and other required information to the
                                                                                                          U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of                        § 52.670    Identification of plan.
                                                    1 InIDEQ’s April 25, 2017 commitment letter,
                                                  IDEQ committed to submit revisions by August 1,         Representatives, and the Comptroller                  *       *    *      *      *
                                                  2018.                                                   General of the United States prior to                     (e) * * *
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:34 Aug 07, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00036   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM   08AUR1


                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                            37027

                                                                      EPA-APPROVED IDAHO NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
                                                                                 Applicable geographic          State submittal
                                                    Name of SIP provision                                                              EPA approval date                          Comments
                                                                                 or nonattainment area               date


                                                            *                      *                   *                           *                     *                     *                    *
                                                  Fine Particulate Matter       Franklin County, Logan             12/19/2012;    8/8/2017, [Insert Fed-       Approved: moderate area attainment dem-
                                                    Attainment Plan.              UT–ID PM2.5 Non-                 12/24/2014        eral Register cita-         onstration and 2014 reasonable further
                                                                                  attainment Area.                                   tion].                      progress motor vehicle emissions budgets.
                                                                                                                                                                 Conditional Approval: reasonable further
                                                                                                                                                                 progress, quantitative milestone, motor vehi-
                                                                                                                                                                 cle emission budget requirements.



                                                  [FR Doc. 2017–16614 Filed 8–7–17; 8:45 am]              & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–                 adopted that might impose information
                                                  BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                  418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (TTY).                 collection burdens on small business
                                                                                                                                                                concerns, and find that the impact on
                                                                                                          Synopsis
                                                                                                                                                                businesses with fewer than 25
                                                  FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS                                     This Report and Order adopts new                   employees will be an overall reduction
                                                  COMMISSION                                              rules to mitigate interference from DBS               in burden.
                                                                                                          feeder-link earth stations to BSS
                                                                                                          consumer earth terminals (ground path                 Congressional Review Act
                                                  47 CFR Part 25
                                                                                                          interference) in the 17.3–17.8 GHz band.                 The Commission will send copies of
                                                  [IB Docket No. 06–123, FCC 17–49]                       We adopt a rule allowing currently-                   this Report and Order to Congress and
                                                                                                          licensed DBS feeder link earth stations               the General Accountability Office
                                                  Establishment of Policies and Service
                                                                                                          to continue operations under the terms                pursuant to the Congressional Review
                                                  Rules for the Broadcasting-Satellite
                                                                                                          of their current licenses, and to expand              Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), and will send
                                                  Service at the 17.3–17.8 GHz and the
                                                                                                          their facilities provided that new                    a copy including the final regulatory
                                                  24.75–25.25 GHz Frequency Bands for
                                                                                                          antennas are constructed within one                   flexibility act analysis to the Chief
                                                  Feeder Links to the Broadcasting-                       kilometer of current antennas and the                 Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
                                                  Satellite Service and for Satellite                     aggregate power-flux density of the                   Business Administration, in accordance
                                                  Services Operating Bi-Directionally                     station at any point does not increase.               with section 603(a) of the Regulatory
                                                  AGENCY:  Federal Communications                            We adopt a methodology for                         Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
                                                  Commission.                                             determining a coordination zone for                   (1981).
                                                  ACTION: Final rule.                                     new DBS feeder-link earth stations, and
                                                                                                          require applicants for new DBS feeder-                Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
                                                  SUMMARY:   The Federal Communications                   link earth stations to coordinate with                  As required by the Regulatory
                                                  Commission adopts technical rules to                    BSS licensees to achieve agreement on                 Flexibility Act (RFA), an Initial
                                                  mitigate ground-path interference                       interference mitigation. We adopt rules               Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
                                                  between the Digital Broadcasting                        specifying the information applicants                 was incorporated in the Further Notice
                                                  Satellite Service (DBS) and the                         for new DBS feeder-link earth stations                of Proposed Rulemaking in the Matter of
                                                  Broadcasting-Satellite Service (BSS) in                 must provide for the purposes of                      Comprehensive Review of Licensing
                                                  the 17.3–17.8 GHz band to protect                       coordination.                                         and Operating Rules for Satellite
                                                  consumers and foster more rapid                                                                               Services. The Commission sought
                                                                                                          Paperwork Reduction Act                               written public comment on the
                                                  deployment of services, greater
                                                  investment, and new innovation.                           This document contains new and                      proposals in the NPRM, including
                                                                                                          modified information collection                       comment on the IRFA. No comments
                                                  DATES: Effective September 7, 2017.
                                                                                                          requirements subject to the Paperwork                 were received on the IRFA. This Final
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public                   Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)
                                                  Sean O’More, 202–418–2453, or if                        Law 104–13. It will be submitted to the               conforms to the RFA.
                                                  concerning the information collections                  Office of Management and Budget
                                                  in this document, Cathy Williams, 202–                  (OMB) for review under section 3507(d)                Need for, and Objectives of, the Rules
                                                  418–2918.                                               of the PRA. OMB, the general public,                     The objective of the Report and Order
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a                    and other Federal agencies will be                    is to adopt processing and service rules
                                                  summary of the Commission’s Third                       invited to comment on the new or                      for the 17/24 GHz Broadcasting-Satellite
                                                  Report and Order, FCC 17–49, adopted                    modified information collection                       Service (BSS) which will address
                                                  April 21, 2017, and released April 25,                  requirements contained in this                        potential interference scenarios which
                                                  2017. The full text of the Report and                   proceeding in a separate Federal                      arise in the reverse band operating
                                                  Order is available at https://                          Register notice.                                      environment. The rules will mitigate
                                                  apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/                    Pursuant to the Small Business                      against ground path interference.
                                                  FCC-17-49A1.pdf. It also are available                  Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public                  Specifically, we adopt criteria to
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES




                                                  for inspection and copying during                       Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4),                facilitate sharing in the 17 GHz bands by
                                                  business hours in the FCC Reference                     we previously sought specific comment                 BSS and Direct Broadcast Satellite
                                                  Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th                on how the Commission might further                   (DBS) services. These new rules will
                                                  Street SW., Room CY–A257,                               reduce the information collection                     introduce a new generation of
                                                  Washington, DC 20554. To request                        burden for small business concerns with               broadband services to the public,
                                                  materials in accessible formats for                     fewer than 25 employees. We received                  providing a mix of local and domestic
                                                  people with disabilities, send an email                 no comments on this issue. We have                    video, audio, data, video-on-demand,
                                                  to FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer                  assessed the effects of the revisions                 and multimedia services to consumers


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:34 Aug 07, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00037   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM   08AUR1



Document Created: 2017-08-08 00:17:42
Document Modified: 2017-08-08 00:17:42
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThis final rule is effective September 7, 2017.
ContactJeff Hunt, Air Planning Unit, Office of Air and Waste (OAW-150), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Ave., Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101; telephone number: (206)
FR Citation82 FR 37025 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR