82 FR 39551 - Request for Comment on Reconsideration of the Final Determination of the Mid-Term Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Year 2022-2025 Light-Duty Vehicles; Request for Comment on Model Year 2021 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 160 (August 21, 2017)
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 160 (August 21, 2017)
| Page Range | 39551-39553 | |
| FR Document | 2017-17419 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 39551-39553] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-17419] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Parts 523, 531, 533, 536 and 537 [NHTSA-2016-0068] ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 86 [EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0827; FRL-9966-62-OAR] Request for Comment on Reconsideration of the Final Determination of the Mid-Term Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Year 2022-2025 Light-Duty Vehicles; Request for Comment on Model Year 2021 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Request for comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In a March 22, 2017, Federal Register document, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its intention to reconsider the Final Determination of the Mid-term Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions standards for model year 2022-2025 light-duty vehicles and to coordinate its reconsideration with the parallel rulemaking process to be undertaken by the Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) regarding Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for cars and light trucks for the same model years. In this document, EPA is announcing that it is reconsidering whether the light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas standards previously established for model years 2022- 2025 are appropriate under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act and invites stakeholders to submit any comments, data, and information they believe are relevant to the Administrator's reconsideration of the January 2017 Mid-term Evaluation Final Determination and in particular, highlight any new information. As part of a 2012 joint final rulemaking by the EPA and NHTSA, the Mid-term Evaluation process was codified in EPA regulation for greenhouse gas emission standards for model years 2017-2025 light-duty vehicles, which requires EPA to determine no later than April 1, 2018, [[Page 39552]] whether the standards for model years 2022-2025 are appropriate.\1\ In accord with this schedule, as noted in the March 22, 2017, document and this document, EPA intends to make a Final Determination regarding the appropriateness of the model year 2022-2025 standards no later than April 1, 2018. In this document, EPA is also requesting comment on the separate question of whether the light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas standards established for model year 2021 remain appropriate, regardless of the agency's decision on the MTE. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 40 CFR 86.1818-12(h); see also 77 FR 62624 (October 15, 2012). DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 5, 2017. EPA will announce the public hearing date and location for this document in a --------------------------------------------------------------------------- supplemental Federal Register publication. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ- OAR-2015-0827 to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions. Once submitted, your submittal cannot be edited or withdrawn. The EPA may publish any submittals received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically to the docket any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written submittal. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). Contact the EPA contact person listed below if you would like to provide CBI to the agency for consideration. For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Lieske, Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ), Assessment and Standards Division (ASD), Environmental Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor MI 48105; telephone number: (734) 214-4584; email address: [email protected]; fax number: 734-214-4816; and Rebecca Schade, Office of the Chief Counsel, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone: (202) 366-2992. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Public Participation Materials related to the Mid-term Evaluation are available in the public docket noted above and at https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/midterm-evaluation-light-duty-vehicle-ghg-emissions. A. How do I prepare and submit information? Direct your submittals to Docket ID No EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0827. EPA's policy is that all submittals received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the submittal includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information to the docket that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your submittal. If you submit an electronic submittal, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your submittal and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. EPA will also hold a public hearing on this notice. We will announce the public hearing date and location in a supplemental Federal Register notice. B. Submitting CBI Do not submit this information to EPA through www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. C. Tips for Preparing Your Comments When submitting comments, remember to:Identify the action by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number). Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/or data that you used. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and suggest alternatives. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified in the DATES section above. II. Additional Information In a March 22, 2017, Federal Register document, the Environmental Protection Agency announced its intention to reconsider the Final Determination of the Mid-term Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions standards for model year 2022-2025 light-duty vehicles and to coordinate its reconsideration with the parallel rulemaking process to be undertaken by the Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) regarding Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for cars and light trucks for the same model years.\2\ In this document, EPA is announcing that it is reconsidering whether the light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas standards previously established for model years 2022-2025 are appropriate under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act and invites stakeholders to submit any comments, data, and information they believe are relevant to the Administrator's reconsideration of the Final Determination and in particular, highlight any new information. As part of a 2012 joint final rulemaking by the EPA and NHTSA, the Mid-term [[Page 39553]] Evaluation process was codified in EPA regulation for greenhouse gas emission standards for model years 2017-2025 light-duty vehicles, which requires EPA to determine no later than April 1, 2018, whether the standards for model years 2022-2025 are appropriate.\3\ In November 2016, EPA issued a proposed determination for the Mid-Term Evaluation.\4\ On January 12, 2017, the EPA Administrator signed the Final Determination of the Mid-Term Evaluation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ 82 FR 14671. \3\ 77 FR 62624 (October 15, 2012). NHTSA is statutorily required to conduct a de novo rulemaking on MY 2022 to 2025 standards for light-duty vehicles. NHTSA has recently taken the first step in this process by publishing the ``Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Model Year 2022-2025 Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards'' on July 26, 2017. \4\ 81 FR 87927 (Dec. 6, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some stakeholders previously commented that they were preparing studies to inform the Mid-term Evaluation that were not ready for submission during the previous Mid-term Evaluation comment periods. This additional comment period provides an opportunity for commenters to submit to EPA additional studies and other materials as well as to complete the preparation of their comments, or submit additional comments in light of newly available information. There is an existing body of EPA analyses and public comments already in the docket. Please note that the agency is primarily interested in comments relevant to the reconsideration of the Final Determination, rather than the Technical Assessment Report (TAR), which is not being reopened for comment in this document. Additionally, NHTSA has been working closely with stakeholders to develop its forthcoming rulemaking since the March 2017 joint document with EPA, and encourages commenters wishing to inform those efforts to directly participate in NHTSA's rulemaking process. EPA's reconsideration will be conducted in accordance with the regulations EPA established for the Mid-term Evaluation at 40 CFR 86.1818-12(h). These regulations state that in making the required determination as to whether the existing standards are appropriate under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, the Administrator shall consider the information available on the factors relevant to setting greenhouse gas emission standards under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act for model years 2022 through 2025, including but not limited to: The availability and effectiveness of technology, and the appropriate lead time for introduction of technology; The cost on the producers or purchasers of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines; The feasibility and practicability of the standards; The impact of the standards on reduction of emissions, oil conservation, energy security, and fuel savings by consumers; The impact of the standards on the automobile industry; The impacts of the standards on automobile safety; The impact of the greenhouse gas emission standards on the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards and a national harmonized program; and The impact of the standards on other relevant factors.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ 40 CFR 86.1818-12(h)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 40 CFR 86.1818-12(h)(1)(viii), EPA also invites comments on the following other factors relevant to setting greenhouse gas emission standards under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act for model years 2022 through 2025: The impact of the standards on compliance with other air quality standards; The extent to which consumers value fuel savings from greater efficiency of vehicles; The ability for OEMs to incorporate fuel saving technologies, including those with ``negative costs,'' absent the standards; The distributional consequences on households; The appropriate reference fleet; The impact of the standards on advanced fuels technology, including but not limited to the potential for high-octane blends; The availability of realistic technological concepts for improving efficiency in automobiles that consumers demand, as well as any indirect impacts on emissions; The advantages or deficiencies in EPA's past approaches to forecasting and projecting automobile technologies, including but not limited to baseline projections for compliance costs, technology penetration rates, technology performance, etc.; The impact of the standards on consumer behavior, including but not limited to consumer purchasing behavior and consumer automobile usage behavior (e.g. impacts on rebound, fleet turnover, consumer welfare effects, etc.); and Any relevant information in light of newly available information. In addition, EPA seeks comment on the use of alternative methodologies and modeling systems to assess both analytical inputs and the standards, including but not limited to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Argonne National Laboratory's Autonomie full vehicle simulation tool and DOT's CAFE Compliance and Effects Model. In accord with the schedule set forth in its regulations, the EPA intends to make a Final Determination regarding the appropriateness of the model year 2022-2025 greenhouse gas standards, and potentially the model year 2021 greenhouse gas standard, no later than April 1, 2018. In this document, in the interest of harmonization between the GHG and CAFE programs, EPA is also requesting comment on the separate question of whether the light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas standards established for model year 2021 are appropriate. In its July 26, 2017, ``Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Model Year 2022-2025 Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards,'' NHTSA stated that as part of its upcoming CAFE rulemaking, it may evaluate the model year 2021 standards it finalized in 2012 to ensure they remain ``maximum feasible'' (See 82 FR 34742). Please provide comment on the continued appropriateness of the model year 2021 GHG standards based on the application of the factors described above or any other factors that commenters believe are appropriate. Dated: August 10, 2017. Elaine L. Chao, Secretary, Department of Transportation. Dated: August 10, 2017. E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency. [FR Doc. 2017-17419 Filed 8-18-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules 39551
AGL SD E5 Rosebud, SD [New] you wish to make. EPA will generally DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Rosebud Sioux Tribal Airport, SD not consider comments or comment
(Lat. 43°15′31″ N., long. 100°51′34″ W.) contents located outside of the primary National Highway Traffic Safety
That airspace extending upward from 700 submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or Administration
feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile other file sharing system). For
radius of Rosebud Sioux Tribal Airport. additional submission methods, the full 49 CFR Parts 523, 531, 533, 536 and
Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on August 14, EPA public comment policy, 537
2017. information about CBI or multimedia [NHTSA–2016–0068]
Christopher L. Southerland, submissions, and general guidance on
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, making effective comments, please visit ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ATO Central Service Center. http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ AGENCY
[FR Doc. 2017–17509 Filed 8–18–17; 8:45 am] commenting-epa-dockets.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
40 CFR Part 86
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–0827; FRL–9966–62–
Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management OAR]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Section, Air Planning and
AGENCY Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides Request for Comment on
and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Reconsideration of the Final
40 CFR Part 52 Environmental Protection Agency, Determination of the Mid-Term
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas
[EPA–R04–OAR–2017–0387; FRL–9966–33– Emissions Standards for Model Year
Region 4] Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Akers
can be reached via telephone at (404) 2022–2025 Light-Duty Vehicles;
Air Plan Approval; SC: Miscellaneous 562–9089 or via electronic mail at Request for Comment on Model Year
Revisions to Multiple Rules akers.brad@epa.gov. 2021 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Agency (EPA). Final Rules Section of this Federal AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Register, EPA is approving the State’s Safety Administration (NHTSA),
ACTION: Proposed rule.
Department of Transportation (DOT),
implementation plan revision as a direct
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Environmental Protection Agency
final rule without prior proposal
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve (EPA).
because the Agency views this as a
changes to the South Carolina State ACTION: Request for comment.
noncontroversial submittal and
Implementation Plan (SIP) to revise anticipates no adverse comments. A SUMMARY: In a March 22, 2017, Federal
several miscellaneous rules, covering
detailed rationale for the approval is set Register document, the Environmental
definitions, source tests, credible
forth in the direct final rule. If no Protection Agency (EPA) announced its
evidence, open burning, air pollution
adverse comments are received in intention to reconsider the Final
episodes, and fugitive particulate
response to this rule, no further activity Determination of the Mid-term
matter. EPA is proposing to approve
is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions
portions of SIP revisions submitted by
comments, the direct final rule will be standards for model year 2022–2025
the State of South Carolina, through the
withdrawn and all public comments light-duty vehicles and to coordinate its
South Carolina Department of Health
received will be addressed in a reconsideration with the parallel
and Environmental Control on the
subsequent final rule based on this rulemaking process to be undertaken by
following dates: July 18, 2011, June 17,
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a the Department of Transportation’s
2013, April 10, 2014, August 8, 2014,
second comment period on this National Highway Traffic Safety
January 20, 2016, and July 27, 2016.
document. Any parties interested in Administration (NHTSA) regarding
These actions are being proposed
Corporate Average Fuel Economy
pursuant to the Clean Air Act. commenting on this document should
(CAFE) standards for cars and light
DATES: Written comments must be do so at this time.
trucks for the same model years. In this
received on or before September 20, Dated: August 4, 2017. document, EPA is announcing that it is
2017. V. Anne Heard, reconsidering whether the light-duty
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. vehicle greenhouse gas standards
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– [FR Doc. 2017–17236 Filed 8–18–17; 8:45 am]
previously established for model years
OAR–2017–0387 at http:// 2022–2025 are appropriate under
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act and
instructions for submitting comments. invites stakeholders to submit any
Once submitted, comments cannot be comments, data, and information they
edited or removed from Regulations.gov. believe are relevant to the
EPA may publish any comment received Administrator’s reconsideration of the
to its public docket. Do not submit January 2017 Mid-term Evaluation Final
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
electronically any information you Determination and in particular,
consider to be Confidential Business highlight any new information. As part
Information (CBI) or other information of a 2012 joint final rulemaking by the
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. EPA and NHTSA, the Mid-term
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, Evaluation process was codified in EPA
etc.) must be accompanied by a written regulation for greenhouse gas emission
comment. The written comment is standards for model years 2017–2025
considered the official comment and light-duty vehicles, which requires EPA
should include discussion of all points to determine no later than April 1, 2018,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:21 Aug 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM 21AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_39711/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules 39553
Evaluation process was codified in EPA • The availability and effectiveness of In addition, EPA seeks comment on
regulation for greenhouse gas emission technology, and the appropriate lead the use of alternative methodologies and
standards for model years 2017–2025 time for introduction of technology; modeling systems to assess both
light-duty vehicles, which requires EPA • The cost on the producers or analytical inputs and the standards,
to determine no later than April 1, 2018, purchasers of new motor vehicles or including but not limited to the
whether the standards for model years new motor vehicle engines; Department of Energy’s (DOE’s)
2022–2025 are appropriate.3 In • The feasibility and practicability of Argonne National Laboratory’s
November 2016, EPA issued a proposed the standards; Autonomie full vehicle simulation tool
determination for the Mid-Term • The impact of the standards on and DOT’s CAFE Compliance and
Evaluation.4 On January 12, 2017, the reduction of emissions, oil conservation, Effects Model.
EPA Administrator signed the Final energy security, and fuel savings by In accord with the schedule set forth
Determination of the Mid-Term consumers; in its regulations, the EPA intends to
Evaluation. • The impact of the standards on the make a Final Determination regarding
automobile industry; the appropriateness of the model year
Some stakeholders previously • The impacts of the standards on 2022–2025 greenhouse gas standards,
commented that they were preparing automobile safety; and potentially the model year 2021
studies to inform the Mid-term • The impact of the greenhouse gas greenhouse gas standard, no later than
Evaluation that were not ready for emission standards on the Corporate April 1, 2018.
submission during the previous Mid- Average Fuel Economy standards and a In this document, in the interest of
term Evaluation comment periods. This national harmonized program; and harmonization between the GHG and
additional comment period provides an • The impact of the standards on CAFE programs, EPA is also requesting
opportunity for commenters to submit other relevant factors.5 comment on the separate question of
to EPA additional studies and other Pursuant to 40 CFR 86.1818– whether the light-duty vehicle
materials as well as to complete the 12(h)(1)(viii), EPA also invites greenhouse gas standards established for
preparation of their comments, or comments on the following other factors model year 2021 are appropriate. In its
submit additional comments in light of relevant to setting greenhouse gas July 26, 2017, ‘‘Notice of Intent To
newly available information. There is an emission standards under section 202(a) Prepare an Environmental Impact
existing body of EPA analyses and of the Clean Air Act for model years Statement for Model Year 2022–2025
public comments already in the docket. 2022 through 2025: Corporate Average Fuel Economy
Please note that the agency is primarily • The impact of the standards on Standards,’’ NHTSA stated that as part
interested in comments relevant to the compliance with other air quality of its upcoming CAFE rulemaking, it
reconsideration of the Final standards; may evaluate the model year 2021
Determination, rather than the • The extent to which consumers standards it finalized in 2012 to ensure
Technical Assessment Report (TAR), value fuel savings from greater they remain ‘‘maximum feasible’’ (See
which is not being reopened for efficiency of vehicles; 82 FR 34742). Please provide comment
comment in this document. • The ability for OEMs to incorporate on the continued appropriateness of the
Additionally, NHTSA has been working fuel saving technologies, including model year 2021 GHG standards based
closely with stakeholders to develop its those with ‘‘negative costs,’’ absent the on the application of the factors
forthcoming rulemaking since the standards; described above or any other factors that
March 2017 joint document with EPA, • The distributional consequences on commenters believe are appropriate.
and encourages commenters wishing to households;
inform those efforts to directly • The appropriate reference fleet; Dated: August 10, 2017.
participate in NHTSA’s rulemaking • The impact of the standards on Elaine L. Chao,
process. advanced fuels technology, including Secretary, Department of Transportation.
EPA’s reconsideration will be but not limited to the potential for high- Dated: August 10, 2017.
conducted in accordance with the octane blends; E. Scott Pruitt,
regulations EPA established for the Mid- • The availability of realistic Administrator, Environmental Protection
term Evaluation at 40 CFR 86.1818– technological concepts for improving Agency.
12(h). These regulations state that in efficiency in automobiles that [FR Doc. 2017–17419 Filed 8–18–17; 8:45 am]
making the required determination as to consumers demand, as well as any BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
whether the existing standards are indirect impacts on emissions;
• The advantages or deficiencies in
appropriate under section 202(a) of the
EPA’s past approaches to forecasting
Clean Air Act, the Administrator shall DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
and projecting automobile technologies,
consider the information available on HUMAN SERVICES
including but not limited to baseline
the factors relevant to setting
projections for compliance costs, 42 CFR Part 10
greenhouse gas emission standards
technology penetration rates, technology
under section 202(a) of the Clean Air RIN 0906–AB11
performance, etc.;
Act for model years 2022 through 2025,
• The impact of the standards on
including but not limited to: 340B Drug Pricing Program Ceiling
consumer behavior, including but not
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
limited to consumer purchasing Price and Manufacturer Civil Monetary
3 77 FR 62624 (October 15, 2012). NHTSA is
behavior and consumer automobile Penalties Regulation
statutorily required to conduct a de novo
rulemaking on MY 2022 to 2025 standards for light- usage behavior (e.g. impacts on AGENCY: Health Resources and Services
duty vehicles. NHTSA has recently taken the first rebound, fleet turnover, consumer Administration, HHS.
step in this process by publishing the ‘‘Notice of welfare effects, etc.); and ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement for Model Year 2022–2025 Corporate
• Any relevant information in light of further delay of effective date.
Average Fuel Economy Standards’’ on July 26, newly available information.
2017. SUMMARY: The Health Resources and
4 81 FR 87927 (Dec. 6, 2016). 5 40 CFR 86.1818–12(h)(1). Services Administration (HRSA)
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:21 Aug 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM 21AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_39711/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-08-19 00:44:46
Document Modified: 2017-08-19 00:44:46
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Request for comment. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before October 5, 2017. EPA will announce the public hearing date and location for this document in a | |
| Contact | Christopher Lieske, Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ), Assessment and Standards Division (ASD), Environmental Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood Drive, | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 39551 | |
| CFR Citation | 40
CFR
86 49 CFR 523 49 CFR 531 49 CFR 533 49 CFR 536 49 CFR 537 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR