82_FR_40760 82 FR 40596 - Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Unopposed Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation

82 FR 40596 - Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Unopposed Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 164 (August 25, 2017)

Page Range40596-40597
FR Document2017-18044

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 16) granting complainant's unopposed motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to reflect a corporate reorganization of complainant Sony Storage Media and Devices Corporation.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 164 (Friday, August 25, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40596-40597]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18044]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1036]


Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and Components Thereof; Notice 
of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting 
Complainant's Unopposed Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 16) 
granting complainant's unopposed motion for leave to amend the 
complaint and notice of investigation to reflect a corporate 
reorganization of complainant Sony Storage Media and Devices 
Corporation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-
confidential

[[Page 40597]]

documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be 
available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 
5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 
205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 
persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by 
contacting the Commission TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on January 24, 2017, based on a complaint filed by Sony Corporation of 
Tokyo, Japan; Sony Storage Media and Devices Corporation of Tagajo, 
Japan (``SSMD''); Sony DADC US Inc. of Terre Haute, Indiana; and Sony 
Latin America Inc. of Miami, Florida (collectively, ``Sony''), alleging 
a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''). 82 FR 8209-10 (Jan 24, 2017). The 
complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 by reason 
of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,345,779; 
6,896,959; 7,016,137; and 7,115,331 (collectively, ``the patents-in-
suit''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United 
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The 
notice of investigation names as respondents Fujifilm Holdings 
Corporation and Fujifilm Corporation both of Tokyo, Japan; Fujifilm 
Holdings America Corporation of Valhalla, New York; and Fujifilm 
Recording Media U.S.A., Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts (collectively, 
``Fujifilm''). Id. at 8210. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations 
is also named as a party. Id.
    On July 28, 2017, Sony filed a motion for leave to amend the 
complaint and notice of investigation to reflect a corporate 
reorganization of SSMD. Specifically, Sony seeks to replace the entity 
SSMD with two distinct entities: ``Sony Storage Media Solutions'' and 
``Sony Storage Media Manufacturing Corporation.'' Sony submits that the 
reorganization did not affect the ownership of the patents-in-suit. 
Sony stated that its motion is unopposed by Fujifilm or OUII.
    On August 4, 2017, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting Sony's 
motion pursuant to Commission rule 210.14(b)(1). The ID finds that Sony 
has shown good cause to amend the complaint and notice of investigation 
to reflect the corporate reorganization of SSMD. The ID further finds 
no evidence that these amendments would harm the public interest or 
prejudice any party to this investigation.
    No petitions for review were filed and the Commission has 
determined not to review the subject ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: August 22, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-18044 Filed 8-24-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                40596                         Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Notices

                                                SUMMARY:    Notice is hereby given that a                  Scope of Investigation: Having                     Commission if received not later than 20
                                                complaint was filed with the U.S.                       considered the complaint, the U.S.                    days after the date of service by the
                                                International Trade Commission on July                  International Trade Commission, on                    Commission of the complaint and the
                                                19, 2017, under section 337 of the Tariff               August 18, 2017, Ordered that—                        notice of investigation. Extensions of
                                                Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of                      (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of                  time for submitting responses to the
                                                Wirtgen America, Inc. of Antioch,                       section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as             complaint and the notice of
                                                Tennessee. Supplements were filed on                    amended, an investigation be instituted               investigation will not be granted unless
                                                August 11, 2017. The complaint alleges                  to determine whether there is a                       good cause therefor is shown.
                                                violations of section 337 based upon the                violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of                     Failure of a respondent to file a timely
                                                importation into the United States, the                 section 337 in the importation into the               response to each allegation in the
                                                sale for importation, and the sale within               United States, the sale for importation,              complaint and in this notice may be
                                                the United States after importation of                  or the sale within the United States after            deemed to constitute a waiver of the
                                                certain road milling machines and                       importation of certain road milling                   right to appear and contest the
                                                components thereof by reason of                         machines and components thereof by                    allegations of the complaint and this
                                                infringement of one or more of U.S.                     reason of infringement of one or more of              notice, and to authorize the
                                                Patent No. 9,644,340 (‘‘the ’340 patent’’);             claims 1–5, 7–12, and 14–17 of the ’340               administrative law judge and the
                                                U.S. Patent No. 9,624,628 (‘‘the ’628                   patent; claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9–22, and 27–              Commission, without further notice to
                                                patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 9,656,530 (‘‘the             29 of the ’628 patent; claims 1–7, 13–24,             the respondent, to find the facts to be as
                                                ’530 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,530,641               and 26 of the ’530 patent; claims 1, 2,               alleged in the complaint and this notice
                                                (‘‘the ’641 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.              4, 6–8, 11, 12, and 15–17 of the ’641                 and to enter an initial determination
                                                7,828,309 (‘‘the ’309 patent’’). The                    patent; and claims 1–3, 5–24, and 26–                 and a final determination containing
                                                complaint further alleges that an                       36 of the ’309 patent; and whether an                 such findings, and may result in the
                                                industry in the United States exists as                 industry in the United States exists as               issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
                                                required by the applicable Federal                      required by subsection (a)(2) of section              and desist order or both directed against
                                                Statute.                                                337;                                                  the respondent.
                                                   The complainant requests that the                       (2) For the purpose of the                           By order of the Commission.
                                                Commission institute an investigation                   investigation so instituted, the following              Issued: August 21, 2017.
                                                and, after the investigation, issue a                   are hereby named as parties upon which                William R. Bishop,
                                                limited exclusion order and cease and                   this notice of investigation shall be                 Supervisory Hearings and Information
                                                desist orders.                                          served:                                               Officer.
                                                                                                           (a) The complainant is: Wirtgen
                                                ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for                                                                          [FR Doc. 2017–18024 Filed 8–24–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                        America, Inc., 6030 Dana Way, Antioch,
                                                any confidential information contained                                                                        BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                                                                        TN 37013–3116.
                                                therein, is available for inspection
                                                                                                           (b) The respondents are the following
                                                during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
                                                                                                        entities alleged to be in violation of                INTERNATIONAL TRADE
                                                to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
                                                                                                        section 337, and are the parties upon                 COMMISSION
                                                Secretary, U.S. International Trade
                                                                                                        which the complaint is to be served:
                                                Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room                                                                            [Investigation No. 337–TA–1036]
                                                112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone                    Caterpillar Bitelli SpA, Via IV
                                                (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired                           Novembre, 2, 40061 Minerbio BO,                    Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and
                                                individuals are advised that information                   Italy                                              Components Thereof; Notice of
                                                on this matter can be obtained by                       Caterpillar Prodotti Stradali S.r.L., Via             Commission Decision Not To Review
                                                contacting the Commission’s TDD                            IV Novembre, 2, 40061 Minerbio BO,                 an Initial Determination Granting
                                                terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons                        Italy                                              Complainant’s Unopposed Motion To
                                                with mobility impairments who will                      Caterpillar Americas CV, 76 Route de
                                                                                                                                                              Amend the Complaint and Notice of
                                                need special assistance in gaining access                  Frontenex Boite Postale 6000, 1211
                                                                                                                                                              Investigation
                                                to the Commission should contact the                       Geneva, Switzerland
                                                Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–                   Caterpillar Paving Products, Inc., 9401               AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
                                                2000. General information concerning                       85th Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN                 Commission.
                                                the Commission may also be obtained                        55445                                              ACTION: Notice.
                                                by accessing its internet server at                     Caterpillar Inc., 100 NE Adams Street,
                                                                                                           Peoria, IL 61629                                   SUMMARY:    Notice is hereby given that
                                                https://www.usitc.gov. The public                                                                             the U.S. International Trade
                                                record for this investigation may be                       (c) The Office of Unfair Import
                                                                                                        Investigations, U.S. International Trade              Commission has determined not to
                                                viewed on the Commission’s electronic                                                                         review the presiding administrative law
                                                docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.                Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
                                                                                                        401, Washington, DC 20436; and                        judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                                                                              (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 16) granting
                                                                                                           (3) For the investigation so instituted,
                                                Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of                      the Chief Administrative Law Judge,                   complainant’s unopposed motion for
                                                Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.                      U.S. International Trade Commission,                  leave to amend the complaint and
                                                International Trade Commission,                         shall designate the presiding                         notice of investigation to reflect a
                                                telephone (202) 205–2560.                               Administrative Law Judge.                             corporate reorganization of complainant
                                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                 Responses to the complaint and the                 Sony Storage Media and Devices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                   Authority: The authority for                         notice of investigation must be                       Corporation.
                                                institution of this investigation is                    submitted by the named respondents in                 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                contained in section 337 of the Tariff                  accordance with section 210.13 of the                 Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
                                                Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337                 Commission’s Rules of Practice and                    General Counsel, U.S. International
                                                and in section 210.10 of the                            Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to                 Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
                                                Commission’s Rules of Practice and                      19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such                  Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
                                                Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).                        responses will be considered by the                   708–2301. Copies of non-confidential


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:40 Aug 24, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00059   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM   25AUN1


                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2017 / Notices                                             40597

                                                documents filed in connection with this                 210.14(b)(1). The ID finds that Sony has              U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                                investigation are or will be available for              shown good cause to amend the                         ANTITRUST DIVISION
                                                inspection during official business                     complaint and notice of investigation to              450 5th Street NW.
                                                hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the                   reflect the corporate reorganization of               Washington, DC 20530
                                                Office of the Secretary, U.S.                           SSMD. The ID further finds no evidence                Telephone: 202–307–2869
                                                International Trade Commission, 500 E                   that these amendments would harm the                  Facsimile: 202–514–6381
                                                Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,                       public interest or prejudice any party to             Counsel for Plaintiff,
                                                telephone (202) 205–2000. General                       this investigation.                                   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                                information concerning the Commission                     No petitions for review were filed and              United States District Court for the
                                                may also be obtained by accessing its                   the Commission has determined not to                  Central District of California Western
                                                Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.               review the subject ID.                                Division
                                                The public record for this investigation                  The authority for the Commission’s
                                                may be viewed on the Commission’s                       determination is contained in section                 United States of America, Plaintiff, v.
                                                electronic docket (EDIS) at https://                    337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                       DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC, et al.,
                                                                                                        amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part                   Defendants.
                                                edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
                                                persons are advised that information on                 210 of the Commission’s Rules of                      Case No. 2:16–cv–08150–MWF–E
                                                                                                        Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part                   Plaintiff United States’ Response to Public
                                                this matter can be obtained by
                                                                                                        210).                                                   Comment on the Proposed Final Judgment
                                                contacting the Commission TDD                                                                                 Judge: Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald
                                                terminal on (202) 205–1810.                               By order of the Commission.                            Pursuant to the requirements of the
                                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                            Issued: August 22, 2017.                            Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,
                                                Commission instituted this investigation                William R. Bishop,                                    15 U.S.C. § 16(b)–(h) (‘‘APPA’’ or
                                                on January 24, 2017, based on a                         Supervisory Hearings and Information                  ‘‘Tunney Act’’), the United States
                                                complaint filed by Sony Corporation of                  Officer.                                              hereby files the single public comment
                                                Tokyo, Japan; Sony Storage Media and                    [FR Doc. 2017–18044 Filed 8–24–17; 8:45 am]           received concerning the proposed Final
                                                Devices Corporation of Tagajo, Japan                    BILLING CODE 7020–02–P                                Judgment in this case and the United
                                                (‘‘SSMD’’); Sony DADC US Inc. of Terre                                                                        States’ response to the comment. After
                                                Haute, Indiana; and Sony Latin America                                                                        careful consideration of the submitted
                                                Inc. of Miami, Florida (collectively,                   DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE                                 comment, the United States continues to
                                                ‘‘Sony’’), alleging a violation of section                                                                    believe that the proposed Final
                                                337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                       Antitrust Division                                    Judgment provides an effective and
                                                amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section                                                                            appropriate remedy for the antitrust
                                                337’’). 82 FR 8209–10 (Jan 24, 2017).                   United States v. DIRECTV Group                        violations alleged in the Complaint. The
                                                The complaint, as supplemented,                         Holdings, LLC, et al.; Public Comment                 United States will move the Court for
                                                alleges violations of section 337 by                    and Response on Proposed Final                        entry of the proposed Final Judgment
                                                reason of infringement of certain claims                Judgment                                              after the public comment and this
                                                of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,345,779; 6,896,959;                                                                     Response have been published in the
                                                                                                           Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures
                                                7,016,137; and 7,115,331 (collectively,                                                                       Federal Register pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
                                                                                                        and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h),
                                                ‘‘the patents-in-suit’’). The complaint                                                                       § 16(d).
                                                                                                        the United States hereby publishes
                                                further alleges that an industry in the
                                                                                                        below the comment received on the                     I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
                                                United States exists as required by
                                                                                                        proposed Final Judgment in United
                                                subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The                                                                            On November 2, 2016, the United
                                                                                                        States v. DIRECTV Group Holdings,
                                                notice of investigation names as                                                                              States filed a civil antitrust Complaint
                                                                                                        LLC, et al., Case No. 2:16–cv–08150–
                                                respondents Fujifilm Holdings                                                                                 alleging that DIRECTV acted as the
                                                                                                        MWF–E (C.D. Cal.), together with the
                                                Corporation and Fujifilm Corporation                                                                          ringleader of a series of unlawful
                                                                                                        Response of the United States to Public
                                                both of Tokyo, Japan; Fujifilm Holdings                                                                       information exchanges between
                                                                                                        Comment.
                                                America Corporation of Valhalla, New                                                                          DIRECTV and three of its competitors—
                                                                                                           Copies of the comment and the
                                                York; and Fujifilm Recording Media                                                                            Cox Communications, Inc., Charter
                                                                                                        United States’ Response are available for
                                                U.S.A., Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts                                                                        Communications, Inc. and AT&T (prior
                                                                                                        inspection at the Department of Justice
                                                (collectively, ‘‘Fujifilm’’). Id. at 8210.                                                                    to its acquisition of DIRECTV)—during
                                                                                                        Antitrust Division, 450 Fifth Street NW.,
                                                The Office of Unfair Import                                                                                   the companies’ parallel negotiations to
                                                                                                        Suite 1010, Washington, DC 20530
                                                Investigations is also named as a party.                                                                      carry SportsNet LA, which holds the
                                                                                                        (telephone: 202–514–2481), on the
                                                Id.                                                                                                           exclusive rights to telecast almost all
                                                                                                        Department of Justice’s Web site at
                                                   On July 28, 2017, Sony filed a motion                                                                      live Dodgers games in the Los Angeles
                                                                                                        https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-v-
                                                for leave to amend the complaint and                                                                          area. The Complaint alleges that
                                                                                                        directv-group-holdings-llc-and-att-inc,
                                                notice of investigation to reflect a                                                                          DIRECTV unlawfully exchanged
                                                                                                        and at the Office of the Clerk of the
                                                corporate reorganization of SSMD.                                                                             competitively sensitive information
                                                                                                        United States District Court for the
                                                Specifically, Sony seeks to replace the                                                                       with Cox, Charter and AT&T during the
                                                                                                        Central District of California (Western
                                                entity SSMD with two distinct entities:                                                                       companies’ negotiations for the right to
                                                                                                        Division), 312 N. Spring Street, Los
                                                ‘‘Sony Storage Media Solutions’’ and                                                                          telecast SportsNet LA (the ‘‘Dodgers
                                                                                                        Angeles, CA 90012. Copies of any of
                                                ‘‘Sony Storage Media Manufacturing                                                                            Channel’’). In 2015, Defendant AT&T
                                                                                                        these materials may also be obtained
                                                Corporation.’’ Sony submits that the                                                                          acquired DIRECTV, and AT&T was
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                        upon request and payment of a copying
                                                reorganization did not affect the                                                                             included as a defendant in this action as
                                                                                                        fee.
                                                ownership of the patents-in-suit. Sony                                                                        DIRECTV’s successor in interest.
                                                stated that its motion is unopposed by                  Patricia A. Brink,                                       The United States and Defendants
                                                Fujifilm or OUII.                                       Director of Civil Enforcement.                        subsequently reached a settlement and,
                                                   On August 4, 2017, the ALJ issued the                FREDERICK S. YOUNG (DC Bar No.                        on March 23, 2017, the United States
                                                subject ID, granting Sony’s motion                         421285)                                            filed a Stipulation and Order and
                                                pursuant to Commission rule                             frederick.young@usdoj.gov                             proposed Final Judgment (ECF Nos. 31


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:40 Aug 24, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00060   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM   25AUN1



Document Created: 2018-10-24 12:42:34
Document Modified: 2018-10-24 12:42:34
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactMegan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
FR Citation82 FR 40596 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR