82 FR 41580 - Amendment of the Commission's Rules To Establish Uniform License Renewal, Discontinuance of Operation, and Geographic Partitioning and Spectrum Disaggregation Rules and Policies for Certain Wireless Radio Services
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 169 (September 1, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 169 (September 1, 2017)
| Page Range | 41580-41583 | |
| FR Document | 2017-18500 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 41580-41583] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-18500] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Parts 1, 22, 24, 27, 30, 74, 80, 90, 95, and 101 [WT Docket No. 10-112; FCC 17-105] Amendment of the Commission's Rules To Establish Uniform License Renewal, Discontinuance of Operation, and Geographic Partitioning and Spectrum Disaggregation Rules and Policies for Certain Wireless Radio Services AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission seeks additional comment on a range of possible actions that may advance the Commission's goal of increasing the number of rural Americans with access to wireless communications services. In order to encourage investment in wireless networks, facilitate access to scarce spectrum resources, and promote the rapid deployment of mobile services to rural Americans, the Commission seeks comment on additional, reasonable construction obligations during renewal terms that are targeted to reach rural areas that lack adequate service. DATES: Interested parties may file comments on or before October 2, 2017, and reply comments on or before October 31, 2017. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by WT Docket No. 10-112, by any of the following methods: [[Page 41581]]Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS): http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and one copy of each filing. Generally if more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. Commenters are only required to file copies in GN Docket No. 13-111. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St. SW., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes and boxes must be disposed of before entering the building. Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to [email protected] or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202- 418-0432 (TTY). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Gentry, [email protected], of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, (202) 418- 2887. For additional information concerning the PRA information collection requirements contained in this document, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418-2918 or send an email to [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) in WT Docket No. 10-112, FCC 17-105, released on August 3, 2017. The complete text of the FNPRM is available for viewing via the Commission's ECFS Web site by entering the docket number, WT Docket No. 10-112. The complete text of the FNPRM is also available for public inspection and copying from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) Monday through Thursday or from 8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. ET on Fridays in the FCC Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 202- 488-5300, fax 202-488-5563. This proceeding shall continue to be treated as a ``permit-but- disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules (47 CFR 1.1200 et seq.). Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1) list all persons attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex parte presentation was made, and (2) summarize all data presented and arguments made during the presentation. If the presentation consisted in whole or in part of the presentation of data or arguments already reflected in the presenter's written comments, memoranda or other filings in the proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules. Synopsis I. Introduction The FNPRM seeks comment on a range of possible actions that may advance the Commission's goal of increasing the number of rural Americans with access to wireless communications services. A core Commission goal is to facilitate access to scarce spectrum resources and ensure that wireless communication networks are widely deployed so that every American, regardless of location, can benefit from a variety of communications offerings made available by Commission licensees. In pursuit of that goal, the Commission has, through various service rulemakings, created flexible-use geographic licenses and established initial term construction obligations tailored to specific bands, many of which were adopted with the stated intent of promoting service in rural areas. Although the Commission's efforts have facilitated the rapid development of a wide variety of wireless services over the past decade, there remains a real and growing digital divide between rural and urban areas in the United States. While the construction obligations associated with geographic licenses are intended to encourage wide deployment of wireless networks, those obligations require licensees to provide service to only portions of the license area, not the entire area. Even the Commission's most aggressive initial term construction obligation, which requires licensees to cover 70 percent of the geographic area of the license, likely leaves significant portions of rural America, where deployment costs may be higher and demand lower, without meaningful mobile coverage. In addition, the Commission's current rules do not require any additional construction after the initial license term--that is, during subsequent renewal terms. Therefore, in order to encourage investment in wireless networks, facilitate access to scarce spectrum resources, and promote the rapid deployment of mobile services to rural Americans, the FNPRM seeks comment on whether additional, reasonable construction obligations during renewal terms that are targeted to reach rural areas that lack adequate service would help achieve the Commission's goals. The FNPRM seeks comment on three methods for applying any such obligations: (1) Applying any new obligations on a prospective basis only to new licenses issued in the future; (2) establishing an ``opt-in'' framework to [[Page 41582]] facilitate additional buildout; or (3) applying any new obligations prospectively to all existing and future licensees of flexible geographic licenses. In the event the Commission adopts construction obligations beyond a licensee's initial term requirements--whether on the opt-in or mandatory basis described above--the FNPRM seeks comment on the obligations that would be most effective to achieve the Commission's goals. Specifically, the FNPRM seeks comment on an additional construction obligation beyond a licensee's initial term construction obligations, under which the licensee would be required to exceed its original construction metric by an additional 10 percent in the next full renewal term, followed by incremental increases of five or 10 percent in subsequent renewal terms. The FNPRM also seeks comment on other, targeted construction obligations that might achieve the Commission's goal of expanded coverage with respect to spectrum bands used to provide service to consumers. In light of the wide variety of flexible geographic licenses and their potential uses, the FNPRM seeks comment on whether to apply any additional renewal term construction obligations to all flexible geographic licenses, or whether certain types of licenses should be excluded. Similarly, the FNPRM seeks comment on whether any additional renewal term obligations should vary depending on the type of license, or the specific band, to which they would apply, and, if so, why those obligations should vary. In the event the Commission adopts additional construction obligations for license renewal terms, the FNPRM seeks comment on various implementation issues. First, the FNPRM seeks comment on requiring licensees to meet the additional construction obligations at the end of the next full renewal license term. As an alternative, the FNPRM seeks comment on requiring licensees to satisfy at least some additional renewal term construction obligations by a certain number of years into their renewal term, e.g., five years into a ten-year renewal term. The FNPRM seeks comment on these and any other considerations concerning the timeframe for implementation that will most effectively facilitate rapid deployment of wireless communications services to rural areas. The FNPRM also seeks comment on possible renewal reporting obligations that could provide insights into the adoption and affordability of services being provided by wireless carriers and that may help achieve our goal of closing the digital divide, particularly in rural areas. In order to create incentives for additional license construction, including investment in rural areas, the FNPRM seeks comment on appropriate penalties should licensees fail to meet those obligations. First, the FNPRM seeks comment on the ``keep-what-you-serve'' penalty for failure whereby a licensee's authorization would terminate automatically for those geographic portions of its license area in which the licensee is not providing service as of the construction deadline, and those unserved areas would be returned to the Commission's inventory for reassignment. Second, the FNPRM seeks comment on a ``use or offer'' penalty whereby a licensee that fails to meet its construction obligation would retain its entire license area, but would be required to negotiate in good faith with any third party seeking to acquire or lease spectrum in the unserved areas of the license. Third, the FNPRM seeks comment on a penalty resulting in total loss of the license or a reduction in license area, including loss of areas that the licensee serves. Finally, the FNPRM seeks comment generally on other penalties, including forfeitures, that could be used as alternatives to, or in combination with, those described above. In the event that the Commission ultimately adopts penalties that result in the return of whole or partial licenses to the Commission's inventory for reassignment, the FNPRM seeks comment on various approaches for relicensing unused spectrum. First, the FNPRM seeks comment on applying a two-phased on-demand relicensing approach, such as the framework established by the Commission in the 700 MHz Second Report and Order, under which interested parties would be allowed to file applications to serve any amount of available unserved area. Under the framework established there, there is a 30-day Phase 1 filing window during which only the failing licensee is barred, followed by a Phase 2 window, which is open to all interested parties, including the failing licensee, and runs until all unserved areas in the market are relicensed. In the alternative, the FNPRM seeks comment on relicensing spectrum for unserved areas through a re-auction framework that would offer all remaining unserved areas in the license together in a single auction. the FNPRM seeks comment on the respective costs and benefits of both approaches to relicensing and any additional or alternative conditions that might serve our rural coverage objectives. Finally, the FNPRM seeks comment on other possible changes to the Commission's rules that might reduce regulatory burdens to improve the renewal process and facilitate the efficient allocation and use of spectrum. The FNPRM seeks comment on whether it may be appropriate to extend the license term, upon renewal, of subject licenses. For example, a 10-year license term could be extended to 15 years, as an alternative to or in combination with any other approach to the timeframe for implementation. In addition, Verizon proposed that the Commission ``adopt a presumption that band-specific service rules or conditions will sunset at renewal, absent an affirmative finding that they are necessary in the public interest.'' The FNPRM seeks comment on what types of rules or conditions should be included under Verizon's proposed sunset presumption, including specific examples, and whether there are categories of regulations that should be excluded from any sunset-at-renewal presumption. II. Procedural Matters Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 603), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the policies and rules proposed in this document. We request written public comment on the IRFA. Comments must be filed in accordance with the same deadlines as comments filed in response to the FNPRM as set forth on the first page of this document, and have a separate and distinct heading designating them as responses to the IRFA. The Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, will send a copy of the FNPRM, including the IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis The FNPRM contains proposed new information collection requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and OMB to comment on the information collection requirements contained in this document, as required by PRA. In addition, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), the Commission seeks specific comment on how it might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business [[Page 41583]] concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' Federal Communications Commission. Katura Jackson, Federal Register Liaison Officer, Office of the Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-18500 Filed 8-31-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
![41580 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules
material comments which VA has commenter, SBA, commented that period, VA is withdrawing the proposed
accepted. ‘‘Section 74.2(b) of the proposed rule.
SBA, Office of Advocacy, objected to regulation would seem to deny an
the proposed rule on various grounds Signing Authority
applicant due process of law . . . [and]
including that it fails to provide an . . . would seem to indicate that if an The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
adequate basis in its Regulatory applicant is formally accused of an designee, approved this document and
Flexibility Act (RFA) certification offense, that person is not eligible for authorized the undersigned to sign and
concerning the proposed rule’s impact Vet Biz Verification.’’ Another submit the document to the Office of the
on small business entities. VA’s RFA commenter stated ‘‘I would . . . Federal Register for publication
language provided that ‘‘VA estimates question if being ‘formally accused’ and electronically as an official document of
the cost to an individual business to be not actually proven guilty of any crime, the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina
less than $100.00 for 70–75 percent of is proper.’’ After considering these and S. Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff,
the businesses seeking verification, and other similar comments, VA seeks to Department of Veterans Affairs,
the average cost to the entire population remove the portion of the proposed rule approved this document on June 23,
of veterans seeking to become verified is prescribing the immediate removal of 2017, for publication.
less than $325.00 on average.’’ In its companies, under certain Approved: June 23, 2017.
comment, SBA stated that ‘‘[o]ne of the circumstances, prior to allowing such
Jeffrey Martin,
most important provisions with the RFA affected company a chance to refute the
requires that the promulgating agency Office Program Manager, Office of Regulation
allegations.
Policy & Management, Office of the Secretary,
give the public some idea of the number Six comments were lodged
Department of Veterans Affairs.
of small entities that any proposed rule complaining that the increase of the
[FR Doc. 2017–18543 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am]
will impact. VA’s proposed certification waiting period following a denial of
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
does not provide any indication of the verification from 6 months to 12 months
number of small businesses that may be does not (i) benefit the Veteran, (ii) is
impacted by the proposed change.’’ unnecessarily long, and (iii) punitive in
After considering this comment, VA nature. One commenter stated that FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
procured a survey to better demonstrate ‘‘extending the waiting period from six COMMISSION
that the proposed rule would not have to 12 months does not allow sufficient
a significant economic impact on a time for ineligible concerns to address 47 CFR Parts 1, 22, 24, 27, 30, 74, 80,
substantial number of small business significant issues’’ any more than the 90, 95, and 101
entities. current rule does. The current rule
SBA also objected to the proposed requires a minimum wait of six [WT Docket No. 10–112; FCC 17–105]
rule to the extent that it failed to months—if issues require more time to
Amendment of the Commission’s
provide statutory or other legal address, the eligible veteran can make
authority following each cited Rules To Establish Uniform License
that determination and simply wait 12
substantive provision. SBA, in its Renewal, Discontinuance of Operation,
months—or 16 months—to reapply.
comment, stated that the proposed rule and Geographic Partitioning and
Second, the extended wait time will not
does not comply with 38 U.S.C. 501 in Spectrum Disaggregation Rules and
incentivize applicants to avail
that the proposed rule does not ‘‘contain Policies for Certain Wireless Radio
themselves of CVE resources. In fact,
citations to the particular section or Services
lengthening the wait period will result
sections of statutory law or other legal in lost momentum and is described in AGENCY: Federal Communications
authority upon which such issuance is the preamble as a form of punishment Commission.
based.’’ After considering the SBA’s for veterans that do not use CVE ACTION: Proposed rule.
comment, VA seeks to withdraw the resources. VA should not take this
proposed rule and to republish at a later approach. Finally, the program will be SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal
date to ensure that each substantive no more efficient in the long run with Communications Commission seeks
revision is followed immediately by a 12 month waiting period. Applications additional comment on a range of
supporting statutory or other legal from concerns that are denied or possible actions that may advance the
authority. cancelled will not decrease, they will Commission’s goal of increasing the
Fourteen comments spoke to potential only be filed in 12 months rather than number of rural Americans with access
violations of due process through the in six.’’ After considering these and to wireless communications services. In
immediate removal of a company other similar comments, VA seeks to order to encourage investment in
without allowing the company an withdraw the portion of the proposed wireless networks, facilitate access to
opportunity to refute the allegations, rule that increases the waiting period scarce spectrum resources, and promote
such as owners accused of criminal from 6 to 12 months, following a denial the rapid deployment of mobile services
offenses. The proposed amendment to of verification. to rural Americans, the Commission
38 CFR 74.2(b) provides that VA understands that in order to seeks comment on additional,
‘‘[i]ndividuals having an ownership or proceed forward without withdrawing reasonable construction obligations
control interest in VetBiz verified the proposed rule and republishing, the during renewal terms that are targeted to
businesses must have good character. proposed modifications to the proposed reach rural areas that lack adequate
Concerns owned or controlled by a rule must be considered a logical
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
service.
person(s) who is formally accused of a outgrowth. Considering the extent of the
crime involving business integrity are revisions as outlined in this publication DATES: Interested parties may file
ineligible for VetBiz VIP Verification. If, and that VA proposes to include comments on or before October 2, 2017,
after verifying a participant’s eligibility additional modifications to the rule, it is and reply comments on or before
the person(s) controlling the participant unlikely that the proposed rule as October 31, 2017.
is found to lack good character, CVE modified would be considered a logical ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
will remove the participant from the VIP outgrowth. Because of the adverse identified by WT Docket No. 10–112, by
database immediately . . .’’ One comments received during the comment any of the following methods:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Aug 31, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01SEP1.SGM 01SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_41749/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Proposed Rules 41583
concerns with fewer than 25 during normal business hours in the the white spaces databases to receive
employees.’’ FCC Reference Center (Room CY–A257), interference protection from unlicensed
Federal Communications Commission. 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC white space devices in the TV bands at
Katura Jackson,
20554. The full text may also be specified locations when these events/
downloaded at: http://transition.fcc.gov/ productions are performed.
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Office of the 3. In providing for this limited
Secretary.
Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2017/
db0714/FCC-17-95A1.pdf. expansion of license eligibility, the
[FR Doc. 2017–18500 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am]
People with Disabilities: To request Commission explained that these
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P materials in accessible formats for particular entities share the need of the
people with disabilities (braille, large other eligible entities for regular and
print, electronic files, audio format), reliable high quality audio services that
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call are free from interference, and often
COMMISSION the Consumer & Governmental Affairs require a large number of wireless
47 CFR Part 74 Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202– microphones to meet their needs. In
418–0432 (tty). particular, the Commission concluded
[GN Docket No. 14–166, ET Docket No. 14– that professional sound companies and
165, GN Docket No. 12–268: FCC 17–95] Synopsis
venues that routinely use 50 or more
1. Background. As an alternative to its wireless microphones at events/
Promoting Spectrum Access for request for reinstatement of a productions generally have the same
Wireless Microphone Operations reservation system for certain needs for interference protection as
AGENCY: Federal Communications unlicensed wireless microphone users, existing part 74 wireless microphone
Commission. wireless microphone manufacturer licensees, particularly given the
Shure requested in its petition for spectrum requirements associated with
ACTION: Proposed rule.
reconsideration of the Commission’s use of a large number of wireless
SUMMARY: In this document, the 2015 Wireless Microphones R&O, 80 FR microphones. The Commission found
Commission proposes to permit 71702, November 17, 2015, that the that these types of professional users
professional theater, music, performing Commission provide a more limited have experience in coordinating
arts, or similar organizations that reservation system that would make wireless microphone uses among
operate wireless microphones on an registration for interference protection themselves at venues or events, even in
unlicensed basis and that meet certain for wireless microphone users in the TV congested markets, and have similar
criteria to obtain a license to operate in bands available in special circumstances needs to existing part 74 wireless
the TV bands (and the 600 MHz service requiring a high degree of reliability for microphone licensees, and concluded
band during the post-auction transition a user that does not typically use 50 or that routine use of 50 microphones was
period), thereby allowing them to more microphones. Shure pointed out a reasonable threshold for identifying
register in the white spaces databases that recent Commission decisions, entities that are more likely to require
for interference protection from including the elimination of two interference protection in order to
unlicensed white space devices at ‘‘reserved’’ TV channels for wireless ensure high quality audio services.
venues where their events/productions microphones in the TV bands following 4. In the 2015 Wireless Microphones
are performed. In addition, the the incentive auction, has resulted in R&O, the Commission adopted various
Commission proposes to permit these unlicensed wireless microphone users revisions in with regard to licensed
same users, based on demonstrated having access to fewer vacant TV wireless microphone operations under
need, also to obtain a license to operate channels that would be free from the part 74 LPAS rules. With respect to
on other bands available for use by interference from white space devices. the TV bands, it revised the rules to
wireless microphone licensees provided 2. Under the Commission’s part 74 provide more opportunities for licensed
that they meet the applicable Low Power Auxiliary Stations (LPAS) wireless microphone users to access
requirements for operating in those rules, licensed operations of wireless spectrum by allowing greater use of
bands. This proposed action promotes microphones are permitted on the TV VHF channels, and by providing for
the Commission’s goal of band frequencies on a secondary, non- closer co-channel operation without the
accommodating wireless microphone exclusive basis, with license eligibility need for coordination where the
users’ needs through access to spectrum restricted to a limited set of specified licensed wireless microphone user
resources following the incentive entities. Prior to 2014, eligibility was determines that the TV signals fell
auction and reconfiguration of the TV restricted to licensees of radio and below a specified threshold (such that
bands. broadcast television stations, broadcast wireless microphone operations would
television network entities, certain cable pose little risk of causing harmful
DATES: Comments are due October 2, television system operators, and motion interference to TV service). The
2017. Reply comments are due October picture and television program Commission also expanded eligibility
16, 2017. producers. In the TV Bands Wireless for licensed use of the 600 MHz duplex
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Microphones Second R&O, 79 FR 40680, gap to all entities eligible to hold part
Murray, Office of Engineering and July 14, 2014, the Commission provided 74 wireless microphone licenses for
Technology, 202–418–0688, for a limited expansion of eligibility using TV band spectrum. In addition,
Paul.Murray@fcc.gov. under part 74, Subpart H, to include outside of the TV bands the Commission
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a professional sound companies and opened up additional portions of the
summary of the Commission’s Further venues that routinely use 50 or more 900 MHz band (portions of the 941–944
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, GN wireless microphones for major events/ MHz and 952–960 MHz bands on each
Docket No. 14–166, ET Docket No. 14– productions where use of such devices side of the 944–952 MHz band), as well
165, GN Docket No 12–268, FCC 17–95, is an integral part of these events/ as portions of the 1435–1525 MHz band
adopted July 13, 2017, and released July productions. When using frequencies in (with special equipment and
14, 2017. The full text of this document the TV bands, these licensed wireless coordination requirements) and the
is available for inspection and copying microphone users may also register with 6875–7125 MHz band, to permit use by
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Aug 31, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01SEP1.SGM 01SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_41749/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2017-09-01 01:50:42
Document Modified: 2017-09-01 01:50:42
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Interested parties may file comments on or before October 2, 2017, and reply comments on or before October 31, 2017. | |
| Contact | Anna Gentry, [email protected], of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, (202) 418- 2887. For additional information concerning the PRA information collection requirements contained in this document, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418-2918 or send an email to [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 41580 | |
| CFR Citation | 47
CFR
1 47 CFR 101 47 CFR 22 47 CFR 24 47 CFR 27 47 CFR 30 47 CFR 74 47 CFR 80 47 CFR 90 47 CFR 95 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR