82 FR 41595 - Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 169 (September 1, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 169 (September 1, 2017)
| Page Range | 41595-41598 | |
| FR Document | 2017-18585 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 41595-41598] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-18585] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482- 4735. Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (the Department) conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (APO) to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the review. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department finds that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of a review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to a review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. [[Page 41596]] Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete a Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of a proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that requests a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90- day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or after September 2017, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future. Opportunity To Request a Review: Not later than the last day of September 2017,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in September for the following periods: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Period of review ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antidumping duty proceedings period of review BELARUS: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A-822- 9/1/16-8/31/17 804........................................... BRAZIL: Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, A-351- 3/7/16-8/31/17 843........................................... INDIA: Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, A-533-865. 3/7/16-8/31/17 Lined Paper Products, A-533-843............ 9/1/16-8/31/17 Oil Country Tubular Goods, A-533-857....... 9/1/16-8/31/17 INDONESIA: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A- 9/1/16-8/31/17 560-811....................................... JAPAN: Stainless Steel Wire Rod, A-588-843..... 9/1/16-8/31/17 LATVIA: Stainless Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A- 9/1/16-8/31/17 449-804....................................... MEXICO: Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon 3/1/16-8/31/17 Steel Pipes and Tubes, A-201-847.......... Magnesia Carbon Bricks, A-201-837.......... 9/1/16-8/31/17 MOLDOVA: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A-841- 9/1/16-8/31/17 804........................................... POLAND: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A-455- 9/1/16-8/31/17 803........................................... REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, A-580-881. 3/7/16-8/31/17 Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon 3/1/16-8/31/17 Pipes and Tubes, A-580-880................ Oil Country Tubular Goods, A-580-870....... 9/1/16-8/31/17 Stainless Steel Wire Rod, A-580-829........ 9/1/16-8/31/17 SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Oil Country 9/1/16-8/31/17 Tubular Goods, A-552-817...................... TAIWAN: Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge, A- 9/1/16-8/31/17 583-844................................... Raw Flexible Magnets, A-583-842............ 9/1/16-8/31/17 Stainless Steel Wire Rod, A-583-828........ 9/1/16-8/31/17 THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Freshwater Crawfish Tailmeat, A-570-848.... 9/1/16-8/31/17 Foundry Coke, A-570-862.................... 9/1/16-8/31/17 Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks, A-570- 9/1/16-8/31/17 941....................................... Lined Paper Products, A-570-901............ 9/1/16-8/31/17 Magnesia Carbon Bricks, A-570-954.......... 9/1/16-8/31/17 Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge, A- 9/1/16-8/31/17 570-952................................... New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires, A-570-912 9/1/16-8/31/17 Raw Flexible Magnets, A-570-922............ 9/1/16-8/31/17 Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A-570-860. 9/1/16-8/31/17 TURKEY: Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon 3/1/16-8/27/16 Steel Pipes and Tubes, A-489-824.......... 9/12/16-8/31/17 Oil Country Tubular Goods, A-489-816....... 9/1/16-8/31/17 UKRAINE: Solid Agricultural Grade Ammonium Nitrate, 9/1/16-8/31/17 A-823-810................................. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars, A-823-809. 9/1/16-8/31/17 UNITED KINGDOM: Cold-Rolled Steel Flat 3/7/16-8/31/17 Products, A-412-824........................... Countervailing Duty Proceedings BRAZIL: Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, C-351- 12/22/15-12/31/16 843........................................... [[Page 41597]] INDIA: Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products, C-533-866. 9/16/16-12/31/16 Lined Paper Products, C-533-844............ 1/1/16-12/31/16 Oil Country Tubular Goods, C-533-858....... 1/1/16-12/31/16 REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Cold-Rolled Steel Flat 7/1/16-12/31/16 Products, C-580-882........................... THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks, C-570- 1/1/16-12/31/16 942....................................... Magnesia Carbon Bricks, C-570-955.......... 1/1/16-12/31/16 Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge, C- 1/1/16-12/31/16 570-953................................... New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires, C-570-913 1/1/16-12/31/16 Raw Flexible Magnets, C-570-923............ 1/1/16-12/31/16 TURKEY: Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon 12/28/15-4/25/16 Steel Pipes and Tubes, C-489-825.......... 9/12/16-12/31/16 Oil Country Tubular Goods, C-489-817....... 1/1/16-12/31/16 Suspension Agreements None........................................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which was produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. Note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), the Department clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department no longer considers the non-market economy (NME) entity as an exporter conditionally subject to an antidumping duty administrative reviews.\3\ Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless the Department specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity.\4\ In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, the Department will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entity's entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). \4\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate. All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) on Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS Web site at http://access.trade.gov.\5\ Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received by the last day of September 2017. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of September 2017, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or [[Page 41598]] bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: August 22, 2017. James Maeder, Senior Director perfoming the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2017-18585 Filed 8-31-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices 41595
Commerce, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Contiguous Regions. The Central Region All deadlines for the submission of
M/S 243, Reston, VA 20192. consists of Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, comments or actions by the Department
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, discussed below refer to the number of
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North calendar days from the applicable
Creation Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112–96, Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Utah, starting date.
Title VI, 126 Stat. 256 (codified at 47 Wyoming, and Wisconsin. The Final Respondent Selection
U.S.C. 1401 et seq.)) (the ‘‘Act’’) created PEIS analyzes potential impacts of the
and authorized FirstNet to take all deployment and operation of the In the event the Department limits the
NPSBN on the natural and human number of respondents for individual
actions necessary to ensure the building,
environment in the Central Region, in examination for administrative reviews
deployment, and operation of an
accordance with FirstNet’s initiated pursuant to requests made for
interoperable, nationwide public safety
responsibilities under NEPA. the orders identified below, the
broadband network (‘‘NPSBN’’) based
Now that this PEIS has been Department intends to select
on a single, national network
completed and once a Record of respondents based on U.S. Customs and
architecture. The Act meets a
Decision (ROD) has been signed, the Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S.
longstanding and critical national
proposed FirstNet projects can begin to imports during the period of review. We
infrastructure need, to create a single,
submit the site-specific environmental intend to release the CBP data under
nationwide network that will, for the
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
first time, allow police officers, fire documentation to determine if the
to all parties having an APO within five
fighters, emergency medical service proposed project has been adequately
days of publication of the initiation
professionals, and other public safety evaluated in the PEIS or whether it
notice and to make our decision
entities to effectively communicate with instead warrants a Categorical
regarding respondent selection within
each other across agencies and Exclusion, an Environmental
21 days of publication of the initiation
jurisdictions. The NPSBN is intended to Assessment, or an Environmental
Federal Register notice. Therefore, we
enhance the ability of the public safety Impact Statement.
encourage all parties interested in
community to perform more reliably, Dated: August 28, 2017. commenting on respondent selection to
effectively, and safely; increase Amanda Goebel Pereira, submit their APO applications on the
situational awareness during an NEPA Coordinator, First Responder Network date of publication of the initiation
emergency; and improve the ability of Authority, Om. notice, or as soon thereafter as possible.
the public safety community to [FR Doc. 2017–18534 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am] The Department invites comments
effectively engage in those critical regarding the CBP data and respondent
BILLING CODE 3510–60–P
activities. selection within five days of placement
The National Environmental Policy of the CBP data on the record of the
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4347) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE review.
(‘‘NEPA’’) requires federal agencies to In the event the Department decides
undertake an assessment of International Trade Administration it is necessary to limit individual
environmental effects of their proposed examination of respondents and
actions prior to making a final decision Antidumping or Countervailing Duty conduct respondent selection under
and implementing the action. NEPA Order, Finding, or Suspended section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
requirements apply to any federal Investigation; Opportunity To Request In general, the Department finds that
project, decision, or action that may Administrative Review determinations concerning whether
have a significant impact on the quality particular companies should be
of the human environment. NEPA also AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single
establishes the Council on International Trade Administration, entity for purposes of calculating
Environmental Quality (‘‘CEQ’’), which Department of Commerce. antidumping duty rates) require a
issued regulations implementing the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: substantial amount of detailed
procedural provisions of NEPA (see 40 Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD information and analysis, which often
CFR parts 1500–1508). Among other Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, require follow-up questions and
considerations, CEQ regulations at 40 Enforcement and Compliance, analysis. Accordingly, the Department
CFR 1508.28 recommend the use of International Trade Administration, will not conduct collapsing analyses at
tiering from a ‘‘broader environmental U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 the respondent selection phase of a
impact statement (such as a national Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, review and will not collapse companies
program or policy statements) with DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. at the respondent selection phase unless
subsequent narrower statements or there has been a determination to
Background
environmental analysis (such as collapse certain companies in a
regional or basin wide statements or Each year during the anniversary previous segment of this antidumping
ultimately site-specific statements) month of the publication of an proceeding (i.e., investigation,
incorporating by reference the general antidumping or countervailing duty administrative review, new shipper
discussions and concentrating solely on order, finding, or suspended review or changed circumstances
the issues specific to the statement investigation, an interested party, as review). For any company subject to a
subsequently prepared.’’ defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff review, if the Department determined,
Due to the geographic scope of Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may or continued to treat, that company as
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
FirstNet (all 50 states, the District of request, in accordance with 19 CFR collapsed with others, the Department
Columbia, and five territories) and the 351.213, that the Department of will assume that such companies
diversity of ecosystems potentially Commerce (the Department) conduct an continue to operate in the same manner
traversed by the project, FirstNet has administrative review of that and will collapse them for respondent
elected to prepare five regional PEISs. antidumping or countervailing duty selection purposes. Otherwise, the
The five PEISs are divided into the East, order, finding, or suspended Department will not collapse companies
Central, West, South, and Non- investigation. for purposes of respondent selection.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Aug 31, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_41764/page/1.svg)
![41598 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices
bond for) estimated antidumping or September 17, 2001, the Department Analysis of Comments Received
countervailing duties required on those published an amended final A complete discussion of all issues
entries at the time of entry, or determination of sales at less-than-fair- raised in this sunset review, including
withdrawal from warehouse, for value and the AD Order on foundry coke the likelihood of continuation or
consumption and to continue to collect from the PRC.2 On May 1, 2017, the recurrence of dumping in the event of
the cash deposit previously ordered. Department published the notice of revocation of the AD Order and the
For the first administrative review of initiation of the third sunset review of magnitude of the margins likely to
any order, there will be no assessment the AD Order, pursuant to section 751(c) prevail if the order were revoked, is
of antidumping or countervailing duties of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended provided in the Issues and Decision
on entries of subject merchandise (Act).3 On May 10, 2017, the Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Department received a notice of intent by this notice.7 The appendix to this
for consumption during the relevant to participate from: ABC Coke, Erie notice includes a list of the issues which
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of Coke, and Tonawanda Coke the parties raised and to which the
the order, if such a gap period is (collectively, the petitioners) within the Department responded in the Issues and
applicable to the period of review. deadline specified in 19 CFR Decision Memorandum. The Issues and
This notice is not required by statute 351.218(d)(1)(i).4 ABC Coke, Erie Coke, Decision Memorandum is a public
but is published as a service to the and Tonawanda Coke claimed
international trading community. document and is on file electronically
interested party status under section via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Dated: August 22, 2017. 771(9)(C) of the Act, as producers in the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
James Maeder, United States of a domestic like Centralized Electronic Services System
Senior Director perfoming the duties of product. On May 31, 2017, the (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Department received a complete and registered users at http://
and Countervailing Duty Operations. adequate substantive response from the access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
[FR Doc. 2017–18585 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am] the petitioners within the 30-day Central Records Unit, room B0824 of the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P deadline specified in 19 CFR main Department of Commerce
351.218(d)(3)(i).5 The Department building. In addition, a complete
received no substantive responses from version of the Issues and Decision
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE respondent interested parties. As a Memorandum can be accessed on the
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/
International Trade Administration of the Act and 19 CFR frn/. The signed Issues and Decision
[A–570–862] 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department Memorandum and the electronic
conducted an expedited sunset review version of the Issues and Decision
Foundry Coke Products From the of the AD Order. Memorandum are identical in content.
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Scope of the AD Order Final Results of Sunset Review
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order The product covered under the Pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and
antidumping duty order is coke larger 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
than 100 mm (4 inches) in maximum Department determines that revocation
International Trade Administration,
diameter and at least 50 percent of of the AD Order would be likely to lead
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
which is retained on a 100 mm (4 inch) to continuation or recurrence of
review, the Department of Commerce sieve, of a kind used in foundries. The dumping, and that the magnitude of the
(the Department) finds that revocation foundry coke products subject to the dumping margins likely to prevail
of the antidumping duty order on antidumping duty order were would be weighted-average dumping
foundry coke products (foundry coke) classifiable under subheading margins up to 214.89 percent.
from the People’s Republic of China 2704.00.00.10 (as of Jan 1, 2000) and are
currently classifiable under subheading Notification to Interested Parties
(PRC) would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping 2704.00.00.11 (as of July 1, 2000) of the This notice serves as the only
at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the reminder to parties subject to
Results of Review’’ section of this United States (HTSUS). Although the administrative protective order (APO) of
notice. HTSUS subheadings are provided for their responsibility concerning the
convenience and Customs purposes, our return or destruction of proprietary
DATES: Applicable September 1, 2017. information disclosed under APO in
written description of the scope of the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: order is dispositive.6 accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Courtney Canales, AD/CVD Operations, Timely notification of the return or
Enforcement and Compliance, People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 39487 (July 31, destruction of APO materials, or
International Trade Administration, 2001) (LTFV Investigation Final). conversion to judicial protective order,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 2 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 7 See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy
Duty Order: Foundry Coke Products from The
DC 20230; Telephone: (202) 482–4997. People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 48025,
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the
(September 17, 2001) (AD Order).
3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 82
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant
Background Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
FR 20314 (May 1, 2017). James Maeder, Senior Director performing the
On July 31, 2001, the Department 4 See Petitioners’ May 10, 2017, submission.
duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for
5 See Petitioners’ submission ‘‘Re: Foundry Coke
published its final determination in the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
from China, Third Sunset Review: Substantive ‘‘Expedited Third Sunset Review of the
less-than-fair value investigation of Response to Notice of Initiation of Sunset Review’’ Antidumping Duty Order on Foundry Coke
foundry coke from the PRC.1 On (May 31, 2017). Products from the People’s Republic of China:
6 See Foundry Coke Products from the People’s Issues and Decision Memorandum,’’ dated
1 See Final Determination or Sales at Less Than Republic of China, 77 Federal Register 34,012 (June concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision
Fair Value: Foundry Coke Products from the 8, 2012). Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Aug 31, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_41764/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2017-09-01 01:50:51
Document Modified: 2017-09-01 01:50:51
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482- 4735. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 41595 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR