82 FR 41678 - Michelin North America, Inc., Denial of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 169 (September 1, 2017)
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 169 (September 1, 2017)
| Page Range | 41678-41680 | |
| FR Document | 2017-18628 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 41678-41680] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-18628] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0094; Notice 2] Michelin North America, Inc., Denial of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Denial of petition. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Michelin North America, Inc. (MNA), has determined that certain MNA tires do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New pneumatic tires for motor vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) and motorcycles. MNA filed a noncompliance report dated September 1, 2016. MNA then petitioned NHTSA [[Page 41679]] on September 8, 2016, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. ADDRESSES: For further information on this decision contact Abraham Diaz, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-5310, facsimile (202) 366-3081. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Overview Michelin North America, Inc. (MNA), has determined that certain MNA tires do not fully comply with paragraph S6.5(d) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New pneumatic tires for motor vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) and motorcycles. MNA filed a noncompliance report dated September 1, 2016, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. MNA then petitioned NHTSA on September 8, 2016, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and their implementing regulations at 49 CFR part 556, for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of the petition was published, with a 30-day public comment period, on November 10, 2016 in the Federal Register (81 FR 79093). No comments were received. To view the petition and all supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online search instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2016-0094.'' II. Tires Involved Affected are approximately 184 Michelin Pilot Power 3 size 180/ 55ZR17 M/C (73W) replacement motorcycle tires manufactured between April 17, 2016, and May 7, 2016. III. Noncompliance MNA describes the noncompliance as the inadvertent omission of the markings designating the maximum load and corresponding inflation pressure for that load, as required by paragraph S6.5(d) of FMVSS No. 119. IV. Rule Text Paragraph S6.5(d) of FMVSS No. 119 provides, in pertinent part: S6.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in this paragraph, each tire shall be marked on each sidewall with the information specified in paragraphs (a) through (j) of this section. . . (d) The maximum load rating and corresponding inflation pressure of the tire, shown as follows: (Mark on tires rated for single and dual load): Max load single __kg (__lb) at __kPa (__psi) cold. Max load dual __kg (__lb) at __kPa (__psi) cold. (Mark on tires rated only for single load): Max load __kg (__lb) at __kPa (__psi) cold. . . V. Summary of MNA's Petition MNA described the subject noncompliance and contends that the noncompliance is inconsequential for motor vehicle safety. In support of its petition, MNA submitted the following reasoning: A. Installation--The subject tires provide sidewall markings that include the correct industry standard tire size identified as ``180/ 55ZR17 M/C,'' the service description identified as ``(73W)'' using an ISO load index and speed symbol, and the load range identified as Load Range ``B.'' This properly and precisely identifies the tire for correct installation. B. Inflation Pressure--MNA points out that the correct application pressures for the front and rear positions are identified on the motorcycle vehicle placard as required by 49 CFR part 567 and in the owner's manual, and these sources are referred to specifically in information published by NHTSA, motorcycle manufacturers, and tire manufacturers. The inflation pressures furnished by the motorcycle manufacturer via these two sources are the pressures that provide the load capacity and the motorcycle manufacturer's intended ride and handling characteristics for the specific motorcycle involved. MNA stressed that the sidewall marking omitted from the tires at issue is not the recommended operating inflation pressure and that this fact is well known to motorcycle owners. 1. For example, MNA observes that NHTSA's online ``Motorcycle Safety Tips'' specifically refers to the owner's manual and vehicle placard: ``Look in your motorcycle owner's manual to find the right PSI (pounds per square inch) of air pressure for your tires. Some bike manufacturers also list this information on the bike itself. Common locations include the swing arm, front fork tubes, inside the trunk, and under the seat.'' 2. Additionally, MNA argues that the Motorcycle Industry Council Tire Guide explains, ``Check the air pressure when the tires are cold . . . and adjust it according to your motorcycle owner's manual or the tire information label on the chain guard, frame, or swingarm.'' 3. Similarly, Michelin's Professional Motorcycle Tire Guide 2016 states: ``Use the inflation pressure recommended by the motorcycle manufacturer . . . The proper inflation pressures for your motorcycle tires are shown in your motorcycle owner's manual.'' 4. According to MNA, the applicable pressure is also a function of the maximum speed capability of the motorcycle, another reason that the proper source for tire inflation pressure is the motorcycle vehicle placard or owner's manual rather than the tire sidewall. 5. Michelin's Professional Motorcycle Tire Guide 2016 and the Motorcycle Industry Tire Guide both advise not to exceed the pressure marked on the sidewall when setting a usage pressure. MNA also notes, the recommended pressure on the motorcycle vehicle placard and the motorcycle owner's manual conforming to 49 CFR 571.120 will never exceed the sidewall pressure for a properly fitted tire as described above in section ``A'' (Installation). The tire size, load index, speed symbol, and load range all provide for proper installation. Additionally, MNA states that the sidewall pressure is not a ``maximum'' pressure. It is the pressure corresponding to the maximum load. For example, Michelin's Professional Motorcycle Tire Guide 2016 advises that the pressure regulator be set at 60 psi for mounting motorcycle tires, and the Michelin motorcycle Web site FAQ's explain that up to 60 psi of pressure can be used to seat beads when mounting motorcycle tires and then adjusted to the recommended pressure found on the vehicle placard or owner's manual. The sidewall pressure corresponding to the maximum load on the subject tire is 290 kPa or 42 psi. C. Max Load Information--MNA argues that the maximum load value corresponding to the ISO load index on the tire is published in Michelin's Professional Motorcycle Tire Guide 2016 available online, the Motorcycle Industry Council Tire Guide available online, as well as a number of retail sites. The ISO load index of ``73'' and the designation Load Range ``B'' that are present on the tire provide load description information, and along with the tire size they provide a clear cross reference to the cited publications that offer the load value in pounds if needed. Again, in MNA's view, the tire size and load range provided are sufficient to assure the tire is appropriate for the motorcycle and the corresponding inflation pressure requirements as a function of speed capability are displayed on the vehicle's placard as well as the owner's manual. D. Other Markings--MNA notes that all other markings conform to the applicable regulations. E. Performance--The MNA petition also observes that the subject tire meets all performance requirements of FMVSS No. 119. MNA concluded by expressing the belief that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its petition for exemption from [[Page 41680]] providing notification of the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted. NHTSA's Decision NHTSA's Analysis: NHTSA has reviewed Michelin's petition and has determined that the petitioner has not met the burden of persuasion that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Specifically, failing to mark the maximum load and corresponding inflation pressure for that load in both Metric and English units on the sidewall of the tires puts an enormous burden on end users to ensure that the subject tires will be properly installed, used, and serviced in accordance with the tire's maximum capability. In the FMVSS No. 119 final rule (Nov. 13, 1973; 38 FR 31299), the Agency explained the purpose of labeling the subject tires with maximum load and pressure. The final rule states: The trucking industry questioned the advisability of labeling maximum inflation and load rating on the tire because it appeared to prohibit the adjustment of pressures to road conditions. The purpose of the labeling is to . . . warn the user of the tire's maximum capabilities.'' Furthermore, in the same rulemaking, the Agency provided relief to manufacturers by accepting the commenters' proposal to have the information only required on one side of M/C tires: ``Several manufacturers suggested that labeling appear on only one side of a tire when both sides of the tire, as mounted, will be available for inspection. Accordingly, motorcycle tires must now be labeled on one side wall only, . . . The complete lack of maximum load and corresponding inflation pressure information on the subject Michelin motorcycle tires creates a potential safety hazard to the end users of these tires. NHTSA reiterates that marking tires with the maximum load and corresponding inflation pressure is necessary for achieving the following: (A) Proper installation on the vehicle--in this case a motorcycle, (B) proper inflation pressure even when application pressures for the front and rear positions are identified on the motorcycle vehicle placard or vehicle owner's manual, and (C) proper usage because the tire size, speed symbol, and load index do not adequately or easily convey the maximum load and pressure capability of a tire. Tire size, speed symbol, and load index are indicators that may be useful for technical professionals in the field; however, it is unreasonable to expect a typical end user to identify the maximum load and pressure using only the markings of tire size, speed symbol, and load index. It is far more reasonable to expect the vehicle user to overload a tire without the explicit guidance provided by the required sidewall markings. NHTSA believes it is necessary to label the tire to ensure the end user is adequately informed about the maximum capability of the tire. Failing to provide load and pressure information, both in English and Metric units, presents a safety risk because users are deprived the information needed to properly install, use, and service the tire. NHTSA's Decision: In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA finds that MNA has not met its burden of persuasion that the subject FMVSS No. 119 noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, NHTSA hereby denies MNA's petition and MNA is consequently obligated to provide notification of, and a free remedy for, that noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120. Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8) Jeffrey M. Giuseppe, Acting Associate Administrator, Enforcement. [FR Doc. 2017-18628 Filed 8-31-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
![41678 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices
I. Overview: Jaguar Land Rover North Compliance. The communication No. 135, Light Vehicle Brake Systems,
America, LLC (JLR), on behalf of Jaguar highlighted a concern where the brake S5.4.3(a) with a new filler cap.
Land Rover Limited, has determined reservoir label was not permanently JLR concluded by expressing the
that certain model year (MY) 2012–2018 affixed to the brake fluid reservoir as belief that the subject noncompliance is
Jaguar motor vehicles do not fully required by FMVSS No. 135, Light inconsequential as it relates to motor
comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Vehicle Brake Systems. On June 13, vehicle safety, and that its petition to be
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 135, Light 2017, JLR’s PSCC concluded that the exempted from providing notification of
Vehicle Brake Systems. JLR filed a concern should be progressed to the the noncompliance, as required by 49
noncompliance report dated June 22, Recall Determination Committee (RDC). U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
2017, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, The RDC reviewed all information on noncompliance, as required by 49
Defect and Noncompliance June 15, 2017, and concluded that the U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
Responsibility and Reports. JLR also issue represented a compliance concern NHTSA notes that the statutory
petitioned NHTSA on July 20, 2017, to FMVSS No. 135, Light Vehicle Brake provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and Systems, but that the condition was 30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, for an considered inconsequential and file petitions for a determination of
exemption from the notification and requested that a petition for decision of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. inconsequential noncompliance be filed exempt manufacturers only from the
Chapter 301 on the basis that this with NHTSA. duties found in sections 30118 and
noncompliance is inconsequential as it JLR described the subject 30120, respectively, to notify owners,
relates to motor vehicle safety. noncompliance and stated its belief that purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
This notice of receipt of JLR’s petition the noncompliance is inconsequential noncompliance and to remedy the
is published under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and as it relates to motor vehicle safety. defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
30120 and does not represent any In support of its petition, JLR decision on this petition only applies to
agency decision or other exercise of submitted the following reasoning: the subject vehicles that JLR no longer
judgment concerning the merits of the 1. The installed label will not fall off controlled at the time it determined that
petition. or become displaced during normal the noncompliance existed. However,
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately vehicle use or operation. any decision on this petition does not
126,127 of the following Jaguar motor 2. The installed label provides relieve vehicle distributors and dealers
vehicles, manufactured between mechanical resistance to being removed. of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
February 8, 2012, and June 19, 2017, are 3. There is interference between the sale, or introduction or delivery for
potentially involved: installed label and reservoir filler neck introduction into interstate commerce of
• 2017–2018 Jaguar F-Pace such that a minimum of 2mm the noncompliant vehicles under their
• 2017–2018 Jaguar XE interference exists. control after JLR notified them that the
• 2017–2018 Jaguar XF 4. The installed label is only able to subject noncompliance existed.
• 2014–2018 Jaguar F–TYPE be removed when the brake fluid
reservoir cap is displaced which, based Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
• 2013–2017 Jaguar XJ delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
• 2012–2015 Jaguar XK on routine maintenance schedules, is 501.8)
III. Noncompliance: JLR explains that once every 3 years in service.
5. The filler cap shows clearly the Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
the noncompliance is that the brake
specification of brake fluid required. Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
fluid warning statement label on the
6. The filler cap provides clear [FR Doc. 2017–18627 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am]
subject vehicles is not permanently
symbols including one for caution and
affixed as required by paragraph BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
one referring to handbook instructions.
S5.4.3(a) of FMVSS No. 135.
The owner’s handbook descriptions
Specifically, JLR installed a label that
indicate the proper brake fluid DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
fits over the neck of the brake fluid
specification to be used in the vehicle.
reservoir that can be removed when the 7. The installed cap conforms to the National Highway Traffic Safety
brake fluid reservoir cap is removed. requirements of ISO9128:2006 which is Administration
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S5.4.3(a) of
a requirement of UN–ECE Regulation 13 [Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0094; Notice 2]
FMVSS No. 135 states, in pertinent part:
and 13h. NHTSA has previously granted
S5.4.3 Reservoir labeling. Each vehicle petitions to accept ISO symbols in the Michelin North America, Inc., Denial of
equipped with hydraulic brakes shall have a absence of FMVSS labelling:
brake fluid warning statement that reads as
Petition for Decision of
a. Jaguar Land Rover petition Inconsequential Noncompliance
follows, in letters at least 3.2 mm (1⁄8 inch)
regarding controls and displays
high: ‘‘WARNING: Clean filler cap before AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
removing. Use only ____fluid from a sealed including brake system-related telltales
container.’’ (inserting the recommended type (FR Vol.78, No. 213 Pg. 66101–66103). Safety Administration (NHTSA),
of brake fluid as specified in 49 CFR 571.116, b. Ford petition regarding controls Department of Transportation (DOT).
e.g., ‘‘DOT 3.’’) The lettering shall be. . . and displays including brake system- ACTION: Denial of petition.
. . . related telltales (FR Vol. 78, No. 225 Pg
(a) Permanently affixed, engraved or 69931–69932) SUMMARY: Michelin North America, Inc.
embossed;. . . c. Hyundai petition regarding lower (MNA), has determined that certain
V. Summary of JLR’s Petition: As MNA tires do not fully comply with
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
anchorage identification (FR Vol. 73,
background, in JLR’s noncompliance No. 129 Pg. 38290–38291). Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
report, JLR stated that a Product Safety 8. JLR has not received any customer (FMVSS) No. 119, New pneumatic tires
and Compliance Committee (PSCC) complaints on this issue. for motor vehicles with a GVWR of more
Investigation was opened on June 6, 9. There have been no accidents or than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds)
2017, following communication from a injuries as a result of this issue. and motorcycles. MNA filed a
safety compliance engineer from 10. Vehicle production has been noncompliance report dated September
NHTSA’s Office of Vehicle Safety corrected to fully conform to FMVSS 1, 2016. MNA then petitioned NHTSA
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Aug 31, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_41847/page/1.svg)
![41680 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 169 / Friday, September 1, 2017 / Notices
providing notification of the size, speed symbol, and load index. It is tel.: 202/622–2490, Assistant Director
noncompliance, as required by 49 far more reasonable to expect the for Licensing, tel.: 202/622–2480, Office
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the vehicle user to overload a tire without of Foreign Assets Control, or Chief
noncompliance, as required by 49 the explicit guidance provided by the Counsel (Foreign Assets Control), tel.:
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted. required sidewall markings. NHTSA 202/622–2410, Office of the General
NHTSA’s Decision believes it is necessary to label the tire Counsel, Department of the Treasury
to ensure the end user is adequately (not toll free numbers).
NHTSA’s Analysis: NHTSA has informed about the maximum capability SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
reviewed Michelin’s petition and has of the tire. Failing to provide load and
determined that the petitioner has not pressure information, both in English Electronic Availability
met the burden of persuasion that the and Metric units, presents a safety risk The SDN List and additional
subject noncompliance is because users are deprived the information concerning OFAC sanctions
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. information needed to properly install, programs are available from OFAC’s
Specifically, failing to mark the use, and service the tire. Web site (www.treas.gov/ofac).
maximum load and corresponding NHTSA’s Decision: In consideration
inflation pressure for that load in both Notice of OFAC Actions
of the foregoing, NHTSA finds that
Metric and English units on the sidewall MNA has not met its burden of The following person is removed from
of the tires puts an enormous burden on persuasion that the subject FMVSS No. the SDN List, effective as of August 22,
end users to ensure that the subject tires 119 noncompliance is inconsequential 2017.
will be properly installed, used, and to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly,
serviced in accordance with the tire’s Individual
NHTSA hereby denies MNA’s petition
maximum capability. In the FMVSS No. and MNA is consequently obligated to 1. SCHNEIDER, Daniel Martin (a.k.a.
119 final rule (Nov. 13, 1973; 38 FR provide notification of, and a free SCHNEIDER, Martin Daniel), zum
31299), the Agency explained the Gruehlingsstollen 1A, Friedrichstahl 66299,
remedy for, that noncompliance under Germany; Rosenstrasse 2, Friedrichstahl
purpose of labeling the subject tires 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
with maximum load and pressure. The 66299, Germany; Petrusstrasse 32,
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Herrensohr Dudweiler, Saarbruecken 66125,
final rule states:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and Germany; DOB 09 Sep 1985; POB
The trucking industry questioned the 501.8) Neunkirchen, Germany; citizen Germany;
advisability of labeling maximum inflation Passport 2318047793 (Germany); Federal ID
and load rating on the tire because it Jeffrey M. Giuseppe, Card 2318229333; currently incarcerated at
appeared to prohibit the adjustment of Acting Associate Administrator, Enforcement. Schwalmstadt, Germany (individual) [SDGT].
pressures to road conditions. The purpose of [FR Doc. 2017–18628 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am]
the labeling is to . . . warn the user of the Dated: August 22, 2017.
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P Andrea Gacki,
tire’s maximum capabilities.’’
Furthermore, in the same rulemaking, the Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets
Agency provided relief to manufacturers by Control.
accepting the commenters’ proposal to have DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY [FR Doc. 2017–18080 Filed 8–31–17; 8:45 am]
the information only required on one side of
M/C tires: ‘‘Several manufacturers suggested BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P
Office of Foreign Assets Control
that labeling appear on only one side of a tire
when both sides of the tire, as mounted, will Sanctions Action Pursuant to an
be available for inspection. Accordingly, Executive Order Issued on September DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
motorcycle tires must now be labeled on one
23, 2001, Titled ‘‘Blocking Property and Office of Foreign Assets Control
side wall only, . . .
Prohibiting Transactions With Persons
The complete lack of maximum load Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
and corresponding inflation pressure Support Terrorism’’
information on the subject Michelin AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets
motorcycle tires creates a potential AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.
safety hazard to the end users of these Control, Treasury. ACTION: Notice.
tires. NHTSA reiterates that marking ACTION: Notice.
tires with the maximum load and SUMMARY: The Department of the
corresponding inflation pressure is SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
necessary for achieving the following: Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the name
(A) Proper installation on the vehicle— Control (OFAC) is removing the name of of one person that has been placed on
in this case a motorcycle, (B) proper one individual, whose property and OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals
inflation pressure even when interests in property have been blocked and Blocked Persons List based on
application pressures for the front and pursuant to an executive order issued OFAC’s determination that one or more
rear positions are identified on the on September 23, 2001, titled ‘‘Blocking applicable legal criteria were satisfied.
motorcycle vehicle placard or vehicle Property and Prohibiting Transactions All property and interests in property
owner’s manual, and (C) proper usage With Persons Who Commit, Threaten To subject to U.S. jurisdiction of this
because the tire size, speed symbol, and Commit, or Support Terrorism,’’ from person are blocked, and U.S. persons are
load index do not adequately or easily the list of Specially Designated generally prohibited from engaging in
convey the maximum load and pressure Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN transactions with them.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
capability of a tire. Tire size, speed List). DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
symbol, and load index are indicators DATES: OFAC’s action described in this section for effective date.
that may be useful for technical notice was taken on August 22, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
professionals in the field; however, it is FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Associate Director for Global
unreasonable to expect a typical end Associate Director for Global Targeting, Targeting, tel.: 202–622–2420; Assistant
user to identify the maximum load and tel.: 202/622–2420, Assistant Director Director for Sanctions Compliance &
pressure using only the markings of tire for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, Evaluation, tel.: 202–622–2490;
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Aug 31, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_41847/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-09-01 01:50:54
Document Modified: 2017-09-01 01:50:54
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Denial of petition. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 41678 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR