82 FR 41901 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and Biscayne Bay, Miami, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 170 (September 5, 2017)

Page Range		41901-41903
FR Document		2017-18711

The Coast Guard proposes modifying the operating schedule that governs the Venetian Causeway Bridge (West) across the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway mile 1088.6, Miami, FL and the operating schedule that governs the Venetian Causeway Bridge (East) across Biscayne Bay, Miami, FL. This action will extend the twice an hour opening schedule of the Venetian Causeway Bridges (East and West) across Miami Beach Channel and Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Miami, FL between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., to include weekends and Federal holidays. This action is intended to reduce vehicular traffic caused by these bridges opening on demand on weekends

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 170 (Tuesday, September 5, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 5, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41901-41903]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18711]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 82 , No. 170 / Tuesday, September 5, 2017 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 41901]]



DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0068]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 
and Biscayne Bay, Miami, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes modifying the operating schedule that 
governs the Venetian Causeway Bridge (West) across the Atlantic 
Intracoastal Waterway mile 1088.6, Miami, FL and the operating schedule 
that governs the Venetian Causeway Bridge (East) across Biscayne Bay, 
Miami, FL. This action will extend the twice an hour opening schedule 
of the Venetian Causeway Bridges (East and West) across Miami Beach 
Channel and Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Miami, FL between 7 a.m. 
and 7 p.m., to include weekends and Federal holidays. This action is 
intended to reduce vehicular traffic caused by these bridges opening on 
demand on weekends

DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or 
before: October 5, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0068 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion 
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on 
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed 
rule, call or email Mr. Eddie Lawrence of the Coast Guard Bridge 
Branch; telephone 305-415-6946, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
AICW Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
FDOT Florida Department of Transportation

II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis

    The Venetian Causeway Bridges (East and West) currently open on 
signal, except that between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., Monday through Friday 
except Federal holidays these bridges open twice an hour, pursuant to 
33 CFR 117.269 and 33 CFR 117.261. Miami-Dade County, the bridge owner, 
and the Cities of Miami and Miami Beach have requested a change to the 
current operating schedule for both bridges to allow for scheduled 
openings twice an hour to include weekends as there has been an 
increase in both vehicle traffic and vessel traffic during these times. 
Bridge logs indicate these bridges open up to four times an hour or 
more during peak travel times, which results in frequent vehicular 
traffic disruptions.
    The Venetian Causeway Bridge (East) across Miami Beach Channel, 
Miami, FL has a vertical clearance of 5 feet at MHW in the closed to 
navigation position and a horizontal clearance of 57 feet between 
fenders.
    The Venetian Causeway Bridge (West) across the Atlantic 
Intracoastal Waterway mile 1088.6, Miami, FL has a vertical clearance 
of 12 feet at MHW in the closed to navigation position and a horizontal 
clearance of 90 feet between fenders.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR 117.261. Under this 
proposed regulation, the draw of the Venetian Causeway Bridge (West), 
at Miami, Florida would open twice an hour, once on the hour and once 
on the half-hour, between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.
    The Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR 117.269. Under this 
proposed regulation, the draw of the Venetian Causeway Bridge (East) 
would open twice an hour, once on the hour and once on the half-hour, 
between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.
    This change will still allow vessels to pass through the bridge 
while taking into account the reasonable needs of other modes of 
transportation. Emergency vessels and tugs with tows can still request 
openings at any time.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below, we summarize our 
analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss 
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the continued 
ability for vessels to transit the bridge during the twice-an-hour 
opening schedule. Vessels in distress, Public vessels of the United 
States and tugs with tows must be passed at any time.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A 
above, this proposed rule would not have a

[[Page 41902]]

significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any 
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this 
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have 
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category 
of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply promulgates 
the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. Normally such 
actions are categorically excluded from further review, under figure 2-
1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
    A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration and a 
Memorandum for the Record are not required for this proposed rule. We 
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a 
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. In Sec.  117.261, revise paragraph (nn) to read as follows:


Sec.  117.261  Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from St. Marys River to 
Key Largo.

* * * * *
    (nn) Venetian Causeway Bridge (West). The draw of the Venetian 
Causeway Bridge (West) mile 1088.6, at Miami, Florida will open on 
signal, except that from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily, including Federal 
holidays, the draw need only open on the hour and half hour.
* * * * *
0
3. Revise Sec.  117.269 to read as follows:


Sec.  117.269  Biscayne Bay.

    The draw of the Venetian Causeway bridge (East), at Miami, Florida 
will open on signal, except that from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily, including 
Federal holidays, the draw need only open on the hour and half hour.


[[Page 41903]]


    Dated: August 22, 2017.
Peter J. Brown,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 2017-18711 Filed 9-1-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

41901

Proposed Rules Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 170

Tuesday, September 5, 2017

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER I. Table of Abbreviations This change will still allow vessels to
contains notices to the public of the proposed
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
pass through the bridge while taking
issuance of rules and regulations. The into account the reasonable needs of
DHS Department of Homeland Security
purpose of these notices is to give interested other modes of transportation.
FR Federal Register
persons an opportunity to participate in the Emergency vessels and tugs with tows
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
Pub. L. Public Law can still request openings at any time.
rules.
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code IV. Regulatory Analyses
AICW Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway We developed this proposed rule after
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND FDOT Florida Department of considering numerous statutes and
SECURITY Transportation Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Coast Guard II. Background, Purpose and Legal Below, we summarize our analyses
Basis based on these statutes and Executive
33 CFR Part 117 Orders and we discuss First
The Venetian Causeway Bridges (East Amendment rights of protestors.
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0068] and West) currently open on signal,
except that between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., A. Regulatory Planning and Review
RIN 1625–AA09
Monday through Friday except Federal Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; holidays these bridges open twice an direct agencies to assess the costs and
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and hour, pursuant to 33 CFR 117.269 and benefits of available regulatory
Biscayne Bay, Miami, FL 33 CFR 117.261. Miami-Dade County, alternatives and, if regulation is
the bridge owner, and the Cities of necessary, to select regulatory
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. Miami and Miami Beach have requested approaches that maximize net benefits.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. a change to the current operating Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
schedule for both bridges to allow for to control regulatory costs through a
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes scheduled openings twice an hour to budgeting process. This NPRM has not
modifying the operating schedule that include weekends as there has been an been designated a ‘‘significant
governs the Venetian Causeway Bridge increase in both vehicle traffic and regulatory action,’’ under Executive
(West) across the Atlantic Intracoastal vessel traffic during these times. Bridge Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
Waterway mile 1088.6, Miami, FL and logs indicate these bridges open up to has not been reviewed by the Office of
the operating schedule that governs the four times an hour or more during peak Management and Budget (OMB) and
Venetian Causeway Bridge (East) across travel times, which results in frequent pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
Biscayne Bay, Miami, FL. This action vehicular traffic disruptions. from the requirements of Executive
will extend the twice an hour opening Order 13771.
schedule of the Venetian Causeway The Venetian Causeway Bridge (East)
across Miami Beach Channel, Miami, FL This regulatory action determination
Bridges (East and West) across Miami is based on the continued ability for
Beach Channel and Atlantic Intracoastal has a vertical clearance of 5 feet at
MHW in the closed to navigation vessels to transit the bridge during the
Waterway, Miami, FL between 7 a.m. twice-an-hour opening schedule.
and 7 p.m., to include weekends and position and a horizontal clearance of
57 feet between fenders. Vessels in distress, Public vessels of the
Federal holidays. This action is United States and tugs with tows must
intended to reduce vehicular traffic The Venetian Causeway Bridge (West)
be passed at any time.
caused by these bridges opening on across the Atlantic Intracoastal
demand on weekends Waterway mile 1088.6, Miami, FL has a B. Impact on Small Entities
vertical clearance of 12 feet at MHW in The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
DATES: Comments and related material
the closed to navigation position and a (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
must reach the Coast Guard on or
horizontal clearance of 90 feet between requires federal agencies to consider the
before: October 5, 2017.
fenders. potential impact of regulations on small
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG– III. Discussion of Proposed Rule entities during rulemaking. The term
2017–0068 using Federal eRulemaking ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
The Coast Guard proposes to amend businesses, not-for-profit organizations
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. 33 CFR 117.261. Under this proposed
See the ‘‘Public Participation and that are independently owned and
regulation, the draw of the Venetian operated and are not dominant in their
Request for Comments’’ portion of the Causeway Bridge (West), at Miami,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section fields, and governmental jurisdictions
Florida would open twice an hour, once with populations of less than 50,000.
below for instructions on submitting on the hour and once on the half-hour, The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS

comments. between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If The Coast Guard proposes to amend have a significant economic impact on
you have questions on this proposed 33 CFR 117.269. Under this proposed a substantial number of small entities.
rule, call or email Mr. Eddie Lawrence regulation, the draw of the Venetian While some owners or operators of
of the Coast Guard Bridge Branch; Causeway Bridge (East) would open vessels intending to transit the bridge
telephone 305–415–6946, email twice an hour, once on the hour and may be small entities, for the reasons
Eddie.H.Lawrence@uscg.mil. once on the half-hour, between the stated in section IV.A above, this
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. proposed rule would not have a

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Sep 01, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM 05SEP1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules 41903

Dated: August 22, 2017. responses to certain state designation received to our public docket. Do not
Peter J. Brown, recommendations for the 2010 Sulfur submit electronically any information
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Dioxide (SO2) Primary National you consider to be Confidential
Seventh Coast Guard District. Ambient Air Quality Standard Business Information (CBI) or other
[FR Doc. 2017–18711 Filed 9–1–17; 8:45 am] (NAAQS). These responses include our information whose disclosure is
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P intended designations for the affected restricted by statute. Multimedia
areas. The EPA invites the public to submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
review and provide input on our accompanied by a written comment.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION intended designations during the The written comment is considered the
AGENCY comment period specified in the DATES official comment and should include
section. The EPA sent our responses discussion of all points you wish to
40 CFR Part 81 directly to the states on or about August make. The EPA will generally not
22, 2017. The EPA intends to make final consider comments or comment
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2017–0003; FRL–9967–11–
OAR]
designation determinations for the areas contents located outside of the primary
of the country addressed by these submission (i.e., on the Web, Cloud, or
EPA Responses to Certain State responses no later than December 31, other file sharing system). For
Designation Recommendations for the 2017. additional submission methods, the full
2010 Sulfur Dioxide Primary National DATES: Comments must be received on EPA public comment policy,
Ambient Air Quality Standard: or before October 5, 2017. Please refer information about CBI or multimedia
Notification of Availability and Public to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for submissions, and general guidance on
Comment Period additional information on the comment making effective comments, please visit
period. https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
AGENCY: Environmental Protection commenting-epa-dockets.
Agency (EPA). ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
ACTION: Notification of availability and identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– The public may inspect the
public comment period. OAR–2017–0003, at http:// recommendations from the states and
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online territories, our recent letters notifying
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that instructions for submitting comments. the affected states, territories, and tribes
the Environmental Protection Agency Once submitted, comments cannot be of our intended designations, and area-
(EPA) has posted on our public edited or removed from regulations.gov. specific technical support information
electronic docket and Internet Web site The EPA may publish any comment at the following locations:

Regional offices States

Dave Conroy, Chief, Air Programs Branch, EPA New England, 1 Con- Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island,
gress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02114–2023, (617) 918–1661. and Vermont.
Richard Ruvo, Chief, Air Programs Branch, EPA Region II, 290 Broad- New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.
way, 25th Floor, New York, NY 10007–1866, (212) 637–4014.
Cynthia H. Stahl, Acting Associate Director, Office of Air Program Plan- Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and
ning, EPA Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103– West Virginia.
2187, (215) 814–2180.
R. Scott Davis, Chief, Air Planning Branch, EPA Region IV, Sam Nunn Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina,
Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 12th Floor, Atlanta, South Carolina, and Tennessee.
GA 30303, (404) 562–9127.
John Mooney, Chief, Air Programs Branch, EPA Region V, 77 West Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Jackson Street, Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 886–6043.
Alan Shar, Acting Chief, Air Planning Section, EPA Region VI, 1445 Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Ross Avenue, Dallas, TX 75202, (214) 665–6691.
Mike Jay, Chief, Air Programs Branch, EPA Region VII, 11201 Renner Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.
Blvd., Lenexa, KS 66129, (913) 551–7460.
Monica Morales, Air Program Director, EPA Region VIII, 1595 Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.
Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202–1129, (303) 312–6936.
Doris Lo, Air Planning Office, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Nevada, Northern
San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 972–3959. Mariana Islands, Navajo Nation, and the Hopi Tribe.
Debra Suzuki, Manager, State and Tribal Air Programs, EPA Region X, Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics, Mail Code OAQ–107, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, (206) 553–0985.

The information can also be reviewed Standards, Air Quality Policy Division, Region II—Ken Fradkin, telephone
online at https://www.epa.gov/sulfur- C539–01, Research Triangle Park, NC (212) 637–3702, email at
dioxide-designations and also in the 27709, telephone (919) 541–0253, email fradkin.kenneth@epa.gov.
public docket for these SO2 designations at etchells.elizabeth@epa.gov. The Region III—Ruth Knapp, telephone
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS

at https://www.regulations.gov under following EPA contacts can answer (215) 814–2191, email at knapp.ruth@
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2017– questions regarding areas in a particular epa.gov.
0003. EPA Regional office: Region IV—Twunjala Bradley,
telephone (404) 562–9352, email at
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For U.S. EPA Regional Office Contacts bradley.twunjala@epa.gov.
general questions concerning this Region I—Leiran Biton, telephone Region V—John Summerhays,
action, please contact Liz Etchells, U.S. (617) 918–1267, email at biton.leiran@ telephone (312) 886–6067, email at
EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and epa.gov. summerhays.john@epa.gov.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Sep 01, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM 05SEP1

Document Created: 2017-09-02 03:25:17
Document Modified: 2017-09-02 03:25:17

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or before: October 5, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions on this proposed rule, call or email Mr. Eddie Lawrence of the Coast Guard Bridge Branch; telephone 305-415-6946, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 41901
RIN Number		1625-AA09

82 FR 41901 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and Biscayne Bay, Miami, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 170 (September 5, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard